Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 272 views

    Choa vs. Choa

    Uploaded by

    Nestor Calizar Jr.
    Alfonso Choa filed for annulment of his marriage to Leni Choa, claiming psychological incapacity. Leni objected to the evidence presented. The appellate court dismissed the objection, finding Alfonso's claims that Leni had filed lawsuits against him and was immature provided sufficient evidence. However, the court ultimately ruled against annulling the marriage, finding the evidence from an expert doctor and Alfonso only showed incompatibility between the spouses, not incurable psychological incapacity as defined by law.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Choa vs. Choa

    Uploaded by

    Nestor Calizar Jr.
    272 views1 page
    Alfonso Choa filed for annulment of his marriage to Leni Choa, claiming psychological incapacity. Leni objected to the evidence presented. The appellate court dismissed the objection, finding Alfonso's claims that Leni had filed lawsuits against him and was immature provided sufficient evidence. However, the court ultimately ruled against annulling the marriage, finding the evidence from an expert doctor and Alfonso only showed incompatibility between the spouses, not incurable psychological incapacity as defined by law.

    Original Description:

    persons and family relations case digest issue on psychological incapacity 392 Scra 641

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Alfonso Choa filed for annulment of his marriage to Leni Choa, claiming psychological incapacity. Leni objected to the evidence presented. The appellate court dismissed the objection, finding Alfonso's claims that Leni had filed lawsuits against him and was immature provided sufficient evidence. However, the court ultimately ruled against annulling the marriage, finding the evidence from an expert doctor and Alfonso only showed incompatibility between the spouses, not incurable psychological incapacity as defined by law.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    272 views1 page

    Choa vs. Choa

    Uploaded by

    Nestor Calizar Jr.
    Alfonso Choa filed for annulment of his marriage to Leni Choa, claiming psychological incapacity. Leni objected to the evidence presented. The appellate court dismissed the objection, finding Alfonso's claims that Leni had filed lawsuits against him and was immature provided sufficient evidence. However, the court ultimately ruled against annulling the marriage, finding the evidence from an expert doctor and Alfonso only showed incompatibility between the spouses, not incurable psychological incapacity as defined by law.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Choa vs.

    Choa

    FACTS:

    Respondent Alfonso Choa filed a complaint for the annulment of his marriage to
    petitioner Leni Choa on the grounds of psychological incapacity. Petitioner filed a
    demurer of evidence (an objection or exception by one of the parties in an action at
    law to the effect that the evidence which the adversary produced is insufficient in
    point of law to make out a case and sustain the issue). The demurrer of evidence
    was dismissed by the appellate court which upheld that the claims of Alfonso Choa
    that hers wife had filed several lawsuits against him indicating psychological
    incapacity and that his wife was immature, carefree and had no intentions of
    procreative sexuality- as sufficient evidence.

    ISSUE:

    Whether or not Alfonso Choa presented quantum evidence for the declaration of
    nullity of his marriage with Leni on the ground of psychological incapacity.

    HELD:

    Psychological incapacity must be characterized by gravity, juridical antecedence,
    and incurability. The testimony of the expert doctor and the respondent only
    showed that the two couldnt get along with each other. The spouses had an
    incompatibility or defect that could possibly be treated or alleviated through
    psychotherapy.

    You might also like