ST Alphonsus Liguori Guide For Confessors
ST Alphonsus Liguori Guide For Confessors
ST Alphonsus Liguori Guide For Confessors
Q
_
c a
_
r
vo l u nt ar y o ccas i o n i s o ne which can e a s i l y be avoi*-*- ^ ^ ^ ^ s can-
o ccas i o n i s o ne which canno t be avo i de d wi t ho u t gr<*
4
^ o ccas i o n
da l . The ne xt di v i s i o n i s i n t o p r o xi mat e and r e mo t *- ^
e n n e i r u n s
i s r e mo t e when i t o nl y r a r e l y p r o vo ke s a man t o *** . ^
i f c t h e
_
i nt o i t al mo s t e ve r ywhe r e . I t i s p r o xi mat e p2A a t * p r o xi mat e
e r a l i t y o f men wi l l f a l l i n t o s i n i n mo s t cas e s . ** some bu t i s
p2A acciden& ( i . e . , r e l a t i v e ) i f i t i s no t p r o xi mat ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
p r o xi mat e f o r o t h e r s , be cau s e t he y f r e qu e nt l y f a l l
i v
^
e y
p r u de nt l y
an o ccas i o n o r be cau s e , kno wing t h e i r own we akne s s , ^ ^
a s i o n i s n o t
f e ar t h a t t he y wi l l f a l l . Some au t ho r s ho l d t ha t **
i n f c Q g i f t
^
p r o xi mat e u nl e s s a man al mo s t al ways o r ve r y o f t e n ** *
e
o ccas i o n i s
B u t t he common and t r u e o p i ni o n t e ache s t h a t a p r o xi
o ne i n which a man f r e qu e nt l y f a l l s i nt o s i n.
v. *i o ccas i o n i s
Ho we ve r i t s ho u l d be no t e d t h a t e ve n t ho u gh *>
l
i&f some go o d and
s o me t ime s p r o xi mat e f o r mo s t me n, i t can be r e mo t e . , -
l o n s
which
p r u de nt i ndi vi du a l p e r s o n. And o n t he o t he r hand, <* ' ^. knows
ar e commonly r e mo t e , may be p r o xi mat e f o r s omeone e l - '
r e
_
a r
^
t o
f r o m p a s t e xp e r i e nce o r f r o m a s i nf u l be nt (e s p e ci a ~
1 a r s
^
n I n a
i mp u r i t y) t h a t he i s we ak and i nc l i ne d t o war d a P*
1
'**" p r o ximat e o c-
cas e l i k e t h i s , a p e r s o n i s o bl i ge d t o avo id no t onk, *
t u a
^i
v p r o x
_
cas i o ns b u t e ve n r e mo t e o ccas i o ns (which f o r him ar e
i mat e ) .
AecASions o f s i n .
He r e by way o f e xamp l e a r e a few p r o ximat e o^
,_
n Q
t hi s wi f e .
1. ) A man who co habi t s wi t h a woman who i s
*. x, and l yi ng when
2. ) One who f r e qu e nt l y f a l l s i nt o bl as p he my *
e ngage d i n game s .
fight or falls
3.) One who often gets drunk or gets into *
vern
into some impurity when in a particular
house.
i I
f ,
'-.
1
'V.
VOLUNTARY PROXIMATE OCCASIONS OF SIM
i e*s
t he o ccas i o n-
Thi s t yp e o f o ccas i o n canno t be abs o l ve d u ni * ^ ^ ^
i r s t no t - c rift o f +-ho o o o a c i ' o n OT at - l e a s t DXOm*
ary first gets rid of the occasion or at least px
57.
it (which we will treat in the next paragraph) . Similarly a person
cannot be absolved if every time he visits a certain house ** even
if only once a year ^^ he commits sin there; fox such visiting is al->
ready a proximate occasion for him. Neither can he be absolved whose
presence in a proximate occasion of sin gives grave scandal to others-
even though he himself does not fall. Some theologians add that abso-
lution must also be denied to a man who will not avoid an external oc-
casion of sin to which is joined some bad habit or serious temptation
or violent passion, even though up to now he has not sinned in this
occasion. The mere danger of falling is enough to oblige him to re-
move the occasion. Thus for instance, they say that if a maid is
tempted by the man of the house she works for and she knows she will
easily fall, she is obliged to quit her job if that can easily be
done. It would be rash for her to think she is safe in such a situ-
ation. (1)
Generally speaking, young men and women who are beginning to
"keep company" should not be indiscriminately accused of grave sin.
Still I think that it is only with difficulty that they free them-
selves from a proximate occasion of grave sin. This is quite clear
from experience: out of a hundred young people you will scarcely
find two or three who have not fallen into mortal sin in this oc-
casion. If it is not so at first, it will soon become so. At first,
they see each other because of their mutual attraction, then the at-
traction becomes passion, and passion then fixes itself in the heart,
becomes an obsession in the mind, and leads them into countless sins.
For this reason, Pico of Mirandola, bishop of Albano, issued
an edict warning confessors in his diocese that such young people
were not to be absolved if after three warnings from others
they did not discontinue their company-keeping, especially if there
were dates at night alone (with the clear danger of kissing and
petting), or if this was done against the command of their parents,
or with a companion whose speech was provocative. (2)
As a general rule, when confessors are dealing with the dan-
ger of formal sin and especially with sins of impurity, they must be
as strict with the penitent as is necessary to safeguard his eternal
salvation. A confessor whose "kindness" prompts him to allow them
to remain or to put themselves in an occasion, is actually being very
unkind. St. Thomas of Villanova calls a confessor who condescends to
such a thing zealous without real zeal. (3) This kind of charity is
against charity. Penitents often try to make the confessor think
that removing the occasion will bring great scandal. But let the con-
fessor stand his ground and pay no attention to such fears. There
will be far more scandal if they see a person come out of confession
58.
and go back to the same occasions of sin. Either they will know
nothing of the penitent's sins and will suspect nothing when he
gives up the occasion; or they will know of them, and by avoiding
the occasion, the penitent will regain his good name rather than
lose it.
Many moralists hold that occasionaries can be absolved once
or twice before removing the occasion of sin, even if it is volun-
tary, provided of course that there is a firm resolve and a promise
to remove it.
But here we have to make a distinction that Saint Charles
Borromeo made, between occasions that are continuous and those that
are interrupted. A continuous occasion is, for example, when a man
keeps a mistress in his home, or when a maid gives in every time
she is tempted by the man of the house. An example of an interrupted
occasion is the man who blasphemes in a game, or gets drunk or gets
into a fight when he is in a tavern. (4)
Keeping this distinction in mind, St. Charles teaches and
rightly that a penitent who is in an interrupted occasion of sin
can be absolved two or three times once he resolves to avoid the
occasion. If, after this, he has not avoided the occasion and
falls back into sin, he cannot be absolved until he first gets rid
of the occasion.
But for those in continuous occasions of sin, St. Charles
teaches that absolution must be denied until they have removed the
occasion. We have shown that this opinion is absolutely to be held
in our Moral Theology. (5) The reason is this: this penitent is
indisposed for absolution if he does not first remove the occasion
of sin, because he places himself in the proximate danger of break-
ing his resolve and consequently of remaining in the same occasion
of sin. Let us explain more clearly. A man certainly sins gravely
if he is in a voluntary proximate occasion of sin and will not re-
move it. Now this matter of removing an occasion is a very diffi-
cult one; it demands doing a great deal of violence to oneself. And
this becomes all the more difficult if he has already been absolved.
The threat of being refused absolution is gone and he will try to
convince himself that he will resist the temptation rather than re-
move the occasion of sin. Consequently he remains in the occasion
and is certain to fall back into sin. Daily experience proves that
most penitents who have been absolved by some careless confessor
make no attempt to avoid the occasion and immediately fall into an
even worse state. For this reason, we hold that a penitent sins
gravely if he seeks absolution before removing the occasion of sin
and the confessor who absolves him sins even more gravely.
'-.
; 1
I
; 5
i
59.
While this is the ordinary procedure in handling continuous
occasions of sin, theologians-make some exceptions, allowing the
confessor to absolve before the occasion has been removed. Namely:
1.) The first case is the penitent who shows extraordinary
signs of sorrow and the confessor makes the prudent
judgment that there is no longer a proximate danger of
breaking the resolution to remove the occasion. The ex-
traordinary signs are then indications that a strong
grace will help the penitent to be firm in removing the
occasion. Still, when absolution can be deferred with-
out much difficulty, I would like to see it deferred
until the occasion has been effectively removed.
2.) Another exception is the case in which the penitent can-
not return, or at least cannot return for quite a time.
He can then be absolved if he is judged to be well dis-
posed and promises to remove the occasion immediately.
The danger of breaking the promise is considered remote
in relation to the inconvenience that the penitent would
undergo in having to leave without absolution or in hav-
ing to seek absolution from another priest or in remain-
ing for a long time without the graces of this sacrament.
Since there is a certain moral necessity for receiving
absolution, the penitent has the right to be absolved
immediately, even before he removes the occasion. In
this case the fact that he cannot remove the occasion
before absolution is on a par with a necessary occasion;
This exception does not hold however if the penitent
has been warned previously by another confessor to re-
move the occasion, and has not done so. He is then con-
sidered a recidive and cannot be absolved until he shows
extraordinary signs of sorrow, as we will see in the next
chapter.
NECESSARY PROXIMATE OCCASIONS OF SIN
So much for voluntary occasions of sin. When speaking of nec-
essary occasions, we must distinguish between physically necesaary
and morally necessary. An occasion is physically necessary when a
person is in prison, or when he is in danger of death and there is
no time or no way for him to break with his mistress. An occasion
is morally necessary when it cannot be removed without scandal or
60.
grave harm to one's life, reputation or fortune. When the occasion
is necessary, the penitent can be validly absolved even with these
occasions still present, for in this case he is not obliged to re-
move it. He must however promise to use the means necessary to
change it from proximate to remote. These means are:
1.) in the case of impurity in particular to avoid the com-
pany of the accomplice, even, if possible, the mere
sight of her;
2.) to frequent the sacraments;
3.) to pray frequently, renewing each day his promise not
to sin again and to avoid the occasion as far as pos-
sible.
It is a good practice to make this renewal each morning before a
crucifix.
The reason for this procedure with necessary occasions is
that the occasion in itself is not sin strictly speaking, nor does
it compel a person to sin. Consequently, an occasion of sin can
easily co-exist with a true sorrow and the resolve of not sinning.
We must still hold that everyone is under obligation to avoid prox-
imate occasions of sin, but. we must understand this of voluntary
occasions of those which the penitent himself has freely chosen.
For when the occasion is morally necessary, the danger is rendered
remote by use of suitable remedies, and Gkxl will surely not with-
hold His grace from one who sincerely resolves not to offend Him.
The scriptures do not say that he will perish who is in danger, but
rather, he who loves the danger; whereas one who does not want to
be in danger can hardly be said to love it. Commenting on this,
St. Basil said: "One who places himself in danger or allows him-
self to remain in it because of some urgent cause or necessity -
when he would not wish to at another time - is said not to love the
danger, but to suffer it against his will. God then will pour out
more grace upon him lest he perish in the danger." (6)
The moralists all agree that it is permissible to absolve
those who will not give up some position, duty, or habitation
which is an occasion of sin for them without doing themselves sen
rious harm --..-as long as there is always a true purpose of amending
and of using the means to amend. Examples of this are: doctors
who are in an occasion of sin when tending to women, or priests
when hearing their confessions w for if either of them drop these
duties they could not live according to their state.
61.
Still all agree that it is a good idea in cases like these to
defer absolution at least to make the penitent more conscientious in
using the means given him to render the occasion remote. I go fur-
ther and say that the confessor not only can but even should defer
absolution when he can easily do this, especially in matters of im-
purity. The confessor is obliged as doctor of souls to prescribe
suitable remedies, and in my opinion, the best remedy of all for
one who remains in a proximate occasion of sin is to defer absolu-
tion, since experience proves that many, once they have received
absolution, fail to use the means prescribed and fall into sin
again. But when absolution is deferred, they will be more careful
to use the means and to resist temptations, because of the fear
that they will be deprived of absolution again next time they go to
confession.
Some will perhaps consider me too strict in this matter. But
this has always been my practice and it will continue to be with re-
gard to those in proximate occasion of sin, even though they be nec-
essary occasions, and even though there are extraordinary signs of
sorrow as long as I judge there is no special reason for absolve
ing them immediately. This procedure is, I feel, much more advan-
tageous for the penitent's eternal salvation. If all confessors
would do this, think how many sins would be avoided and how many
souls would be saved!
CONCLUSION
I repeat what I said above: when the confessor is trying to
free a penitent from formal sin, he must use the more benign opinion
in so far as prudence dictates. But if the benign opinion renders
the danger of formal sin more proximate (as is the case with prox-
imate occasions of sin), it is useful and sometimes necessary to
use the stricter opinion. For in this case the stricter opinion
is definitely more advantageous for the salvation of their souls.
If a person who remains in a necessary occasion of sin piles
up, even with the help of the remedies, a record of similar sins
and there seems to be small hope of improvement, he should be denied
absolution as long as the occasion of sin lasts. I believe this is
based on the Gospel command: if your eye scandalizes you, pluck it
out . (Mk. 9/46) This excludes the case in which the penitent shows
extraordinary signs of sorrow, for they can always can be taken as a
safe hope of improvement.
62.
1. Omitted here a.reference to engaged couples. As Ford^Kelly
pointed out CContemporary Moral Theology, 1) Alphonsus' po-^
sition seems "almost unbelievably stern" but the editor is
not so reluctant as they to "explain it as pertaining to
another time and another social milieu." Because of that it
;
.
has been omitted.
2. No reference was given for the quote from Pico.
3. Thomas of Villanova, cone. fer. sexta p. dom IV Quad num 12.
4. Sh. Charles, Acta Eccl. Mediol., part 4.
5. MT, Lib VI, n. 454.
6. St . B as i l , C o ns t i t u t i o ne s mo na s t i c , ch 5. '
-
(
i aJi-V.xjUJTng'n
63.
CHAPTER FIVE
HaM
u ar it s
I\CldLlVS
HABITUARIES
Habituaries are those who have contracted a habit of sin which
they have not yet confessed. Theologians teach that they can be ab-
solved the first time they confess the bad habit, or once they have
rejected it provided they have true sorrow for it and the firm re-
solve of employing the means that will bring about correction.
However, if the habit is deeply ingrained, the confessor can
defer absolution to see how faithful the penitent will be in carry-
ing out the prescribed means and to impress upon the penitent the
seriousness of his bad habit.
m
It should be noted here that in regard to external sins, five
falls a month can constitute a bad habit, provided there is some in-
terval between each of the falls. In the matter of fornication, sod^
omy, and bestiality, a considerably smaller number is enough to es-
tablish a habit. For example, a person who fornicates once a month
over tne space of a year can well be called an habituary.
RECIDIVES
Recidives are those who have gone to confession and then re-
lapsed into the same, or almost the same, sinful habit, with no im-
provement .
According to the common opinion, recidives cannot be absolved
if they manifest nothing more than ordinary sorrow; that is, if they
merely confess their sins and say they are sorry and do not intend
to sin again. The reason for this is that a habit of sin relapsed
into with no sign of improvement gives grounds to the suspicion that
the penitent's supposed sorrow and purpose of amendment are not sin-
cere. Consequently absolution should be delayed for a time, until
there is a good sign of improvement.
In regard to this point there has been regrettable harm done
to souls. So often bad confessors injudiciously absolve scores of
recidives, with the result that the recidives themselves see how
quickly they are absolved and begin to lose their horror for sin and
spend their lives sunk in the mire of sin.
Some theologians allow absolution to recidives who give only
ordinary signs of sorrow - up to the third or fourth relapse. But
I could never bring myself to agree with this opinion. An habituary
who falls back into sin without any correction even after one con-
fession is a true recidive, and there is a founded suspicion that '
he is not properly disposed.
RECIDIVES W VENIAL SIN
Before going on, it should be noted that this rule holds even
for recidives in venial sin. While it is commonly held that those
who commit venial sin can be absolved more easily (because their oc->-
casions are more frequent), still there is a fear that confessions
*
65.
of this kind are sacrilegious or at least invalid, because the common
opinion teaches that it is a grave sin and a sacrilege to receive ab~
solution for venial sins without true sorrow and purpose of amendment.
It is not enough to be sorry for the astounding number of venial sins,
while lacking sorrow for any sin in itself.
The confessor must be careful not to absolve these penitents
injudiciously. Even if they are in good faith, he cannot be excused
from sacrilege, for he would be imparting absolution to penitents
who cannot be considered to have the dispositions necessary for ab-
solution. Therefore, if he does not want to commit a sin himself,
the confessor should take care either to dispose the penitent to be
sorry for some particular venial sin which he hates very much, or to
ask him to confess some serious sin of his past life. (He can con-
fess this in general without giving the number.) In this way the
confessor will have certain matter for absolution. Otherwise he
would be obliged to delay absolution for some time.
MLAV Of ABSOLUTION
I said "for some time", because it is not necessary to delay
absolution for months or even years as the rigorists' demand, whether
it be to recidives in venial sin or to recidives in mortal sin. Or-
dinarily a delay of eight or ten days will be enough, if the sin
proceeds from weakness. Reputable theologians teach that a month's
delay is excessive and dangerous, because, after this long a stretch,
it is hard to get a recidive to return. (1)
Benedict XIV favors this opinion. In speaking of confessors
who delay absolution when that is proper, he says: "Let the con-
fessor urge them to return as quickly as possible, so that they may
be given the benefits of sacramental absolution." (2) Notice the
words "as quickly as possible" and "that they may be given". I
hold that absolution can be delayed for fifteen or twenty days at
most.
But this rule does not apply to the "Easter Lambs". Exper-
ience tells us to give them a longer delay, because there is suf-
ficient reason to suspect that they are keeping out of sin in or-
der to avoid the censure (3) rather than with the sincere intention
of changing their lives.
66.
Ano t he r e xce p t io n mu s t be made f o r t ho s e who succumbed t o an e x-
t e r nal p r o ximat e o ccas io n of s i n. Most of t he s e s ho u l d be t e s t e d f o r
a gr e at e r t i me , be cau s e , as we no t e d in t he l a s t chap t e r , an o ccas io n
i s a more di f f i c u l t f o r ce t o r e s i s t . However e ve n he r e a mo nt h' s de -
l ay wi l l be l o ng e no u gh, bu t t he co nf e s s o r mu s t on no acco u nt t e l l
t he p e ni t e nt no t t o r e t u r n t i l l t he month i s o u t . This would f r i ght e n
him o f f . The be t t e r t hi ng i s t o have t he p e ni t e nt r e t u r n af t e r one o r
two we e ks , and t he n ne at l y p u t abs o l u t io n o f f t i l l t he end of t he
mo nt h.
EXTRAORVIUARy SIGNS Of SORROW
As we have s ai d, o r dinar y s igns o f s o r r o w and p u r p o s e of amend-
ment ar e no t s u f f i ci e nt t o j u s t i f y abs o l u t io n o f r e ci di ve s . The com-
mon o p inio n demands e xt r ao r dinar y s i gns , and s ays t hat t he s e s u f f i ce .
The r e as o n f o r t h i s : a s o l i d and we l l -gr o u nde d e xt r ao r di nar y s ign
wi l l remove t he s u s p icio n t hat t he p e ni t e nt i s indis p o s e d - a s u s -
p icio n t hat was p r e s e nt owing t o t he p r e vio u s r e l ap s e .
The B is ho p s o f Belgium s p o ke r i ght l y when t he y s ai d: "In t he
co nve r s io n of a s i nne r , God do e s no t r e gar d t he amount o f t ime as
much as he r e gar ds t he amount o f s o r r o w. " Hence t he y f o r bade co nf e s -
s o r s t o demand t hat r e ci di ve s u nde r go a l e ngt hy p r o bat io n as t he o r -
dinar y co ndit io n f o r abs o l u t i o n. The bis ho p s act e d co r r e ct l y, f o r a
p r o bat io n p e r io d by i t s e l f i s no t a s ign of co nve r s io n. C o nve r s io n
comes by di vi ne gr ace and t hat do e s no t demand t ime bu t o f t e n wor ks
i ns t ant ane o u s l y. Thus a change o f he ar t can be e f f e ct i ve l y de t e r -
mined by o t he r s i gns even wit ho u t a t ime of p r o bat i o n.
Ot he r s igns of t he p e ni t e nt ' s act u al di s p o s i t i o n ar e some-
t ime s e ve n be t t e r t han a p r o bat io n p e r io d f o r manif e s t ing hi s co n-
ve r s i o n. The s e s igns di r e ct l y t e s t i f y t o t he p e ni t e nt ' s di s p o s i -
t i o n, whil e t he p r o bat io n t e s t i f i e s o nl y i ndi r e ct l y. I t f r e qu e nt l y
hap p e ns , in f act , t hat a p e r s o n wi l l abs t ai n from s i n f o r a l o ng
t ime wit ho u t be ing dis p o s e d f o r abs o l u t i o n.
Hence o ne au t ho r s ays : "If t he r e l ap s e comes from a p e r s o n' s
own we akne s s wit ho u t any o t he r e xt r i ns i c vo l u nt ar y cau s e , i t i s a l -
mo s t r as h t o s ay t hat he i s al ways i ndi s p o s e d. " In ano t he r p l ace
t hi s t he o l o gian s ays t hat i f a r e ci di ve s i ns be cau s e o f t he co mp u l -
s io n o f a bad habi t , he s ho u l d be abs o l ve d as l o ng as he manif e s t s
a f ir m r e s o l ve t o u s e t he means f o r hi s co r r e ct i o n. He adds : "In
o u r o p inio n, o t he r p r o ce du r e s ar e t o o r i go r o u s , and co nf e s s o r s who
employ them ar e s e t t i ng as ide t he t r u e s p i r i t of t he Church and of
67.
Christ. The sacrament of penance is not only one of judgment, but al-
so one of healing and salvation." (5)
The moralists list several things that are considered extraor-
dinary signs of sorrow:
1.) An over-powering sorrow poured out in tears (provided they
flow from compunction for their sins) or a heartfelt ex-
pression of sorrow, which is sometimes a more sure sign
than tears.
2.) A lessening in the number of sins - provided the penitent
was in the same occasions and temptations. Or: the peni-
tent managed to remain in the state of grace for a consid-
erable time after his last confession, say for twenty or
twenty-five days when he ordinarily fell several times a
week. Or: he fell only after a vigorous fight. Or: he
had stayed clear of mortal sin for some time before com-
ing to confession.
3.) Applying oneself diligently to the task of improvement is
an extraordinary sign. For example, the penitent consci-
entiously avoided the occasions of sin, used the means
prescribed by the confessor, or he used fasting, prayer,
and good works in order to uproot the vice.
4.) Another extraordinary sign: he asks the confessor for a
remedy or for a new way of improving himself. Similarly:
he promises to use the means which the confessor suggests,
especially if this is the first time that he has received
that suggestion. However I question whether he can com-
pletely be trusted if he makes this promise without any
other extraordinary signs of sorrow. Penitents often
promise things quickly in order to get absolution - and
then have difficulty in keeping their promise.
5.) A spontaneous confession. It is not spontaneous if the
penitent comes only to fulfill his Easter Duty, or to keep
with a custom of going to confession at certain times, for
instance at Christmas. It is not spontaneous if he is
forced into it by his parents, his teacher, or his em-
ployer. A confession is spontaneous only if he comes en-
tirely on his own, led by some divine light, and with no
other purpose but to receive divine grace. It is very
clear if, in order to make his confession, he made a long
trip, deprived himself of considerable gain, suffered
68.
some grave inconvenience, or triumphed over a serious in-
ternal or external repulsion.
6.) If he comes because of some extraordinary impulse. For in-
stance, a sermon he heard, the death of a friend, fear of .
some imminent calamity, such as an earthquake or a plague.
7.) If he confesses sins he has previously confessed out of
shame.
*
8.) If after the confessor's counseling he shows signs of a
new realization of the evil of sin and of the danger to
his own salvation.
Some writers give other signs. For instance, if the penitent ac-
cepts a big penance willingly, if he claims he repented of his sin as
soon as he had committed it, or if he protests that he would rather die
than sin again. I am not so sure that these signs are sufficient in
themselves. I would rather say that they serve to strengthen other
sufficient signs.
MORAL CERT1TUVE OF THE PENITENT'S V1SP0S1T10NS
Whenever there is one of these signs, from which the confessor
can prudently judge the penitent's change of heart, absolution can be
given. The confessor needs moral certainty concerning the penitent's
dispositions in order to absolve. In some sacraments, where the mat-
ter is physical, physical certainty is required. But this is not the
case with the sacrament of penance. The matter of confession is mor-
al, that is, the actions of the penitent, and consequently moral cer-
titude is enough.
Actually it is enough for the confessor to have a prudent prob-
ability as to the penitent's dispositions with no prudent suspicion of
the opposite. If more were required it would be difficult to absolve
any sinner, for all the signs a penitent could give us would never es-
tablish anything more than a kind of probability in regard to his dis-
positions.
The author of \YU>&W.TJLOYU. pth. Li novzZLi Con{,A&osvl says: "To
impart absolution, nothing more is required than a prudent and prob-
able judgment as to the penitent's dispositions. Therefore, if the
circumstances do not give rise to a doubt about the penitent's dispo-
sitions, the confessor should let things rest and not trouble himself
or the penitent by trying to establish a certainty that is impossible.'
(6)
69,
Here let it be noted: recidives in blasphemy can more easily
be absolved than those in sins of hate, theft, or lust, for these
latter habits are rooted more fiercely and involve a more impelling
inclination to the sin.
PERMISSIBLE TO VElky ABSOLUTION FOR A DISPOSED PENITENT
We have established the fact that the confessor can absolve
habituaries and recidives who prove that they are disposed for the
sacrament by some extraordinary sign of sorrow. We did not, how-
ever, say that the confessor must absolve him. It is up to the con-
fessor to delay absolution if he feels that a delay is expedient.
The penitent does admittedly have a right to absolution once he has
confessed his sins, still he does not have a right to be absolved
immediately. The confessor, in his office of doctor, can and some-
times must delay absolution when he judges it necessary for the
spiritual progress of his penitent.
But is it ordinarily a good idea to use this delaying tactic
without the penitent's consent? Certainly it would not be a good
idea if it would do the penitent more harm than good, or if it would
cause him to suffer some dishonor and perhaps the danger of losing
his reputation.
Allowing for this exception, some hold that delay of absolu-
tion is the better practice when dealing with this type of recidive.
On the other hand, others more commonly hold that it should be done
only rarely. This opinion is held by the celebrated missionary,
Father Leonard of Port Maurice. But I feel that it is better to say
that no general rule can be made; rather the confessor must judge
each case according to its own circumstances. He should pray for
God's guidance and then proceed to judge according to his lights. (7)
My thinking on the matter is this. If the penitent has re-
lapsed from his own weakness (as in the case of anger, hatred, blas-
phemy, self-abuse, and doZtcZatio motLO&a) , I hold - and this is the
most common opinion of theologians - that it is hardly ever a good
idea to delay absolution, if the penitent is disposed. We should
trust that the grace of the sacrament will do more toward his prog-
ress than a delay of absolution.
But the picture is different with a person who has relapsed
because of some occasion of sin, even if it is a necessary one. The
reason is this: an occasion of sin arouses a more vivid craving for
70.
the sin, and the presence of one's accomplice has a more violent ef-
fect -upon the senses and upon one' s affection for sin than does a
habit of sin. Because of this, the penitent who is caught in some
occasion has to do violence to himself, not only in order to over-
come the temptation, but even in order to get himself away from the
company and presence of his accomplice. He must do this in order to
render a proximate occasion remote.
Delay of absolution is especially necessary if the occasion is
voluntary and should be entirely avoided. To absolve in such a case
would run the risk of putting the penitent in danger of breaking his
promise to remove the occasion, as we have already mentioned.
With the habit of sin, the danger of breaking one's resolve
is ordinarily more remote. On one hand, there is no external ob-
ject strongly impelling him to sin. On the other, the retention of
the bad habit is not voluntary - while the failure to remove the oc-
casion in the other case is voluntary. Because of this, God gives
greater help to the habituary, when he needs it, and we can conse-
quently expect more progress from the sacrament than from a delay of
the sacrament. The grace of God will be stronger and more effica-
cious in order to help the penitent uproot his bad habit.
In support of this opinion, Salmanticenses asks: "Why do we
hope for more grace from a delay of absolution, which deprives the
sinner of grace - than from absolution itself, which gives him grace
and makes him a friend of God?" (8) Cardinal Toledo, speaking of
the sin of self-abuse, feels that no remedy is more efficacious in
counteracting this habit than a frequent reception of the sacrament
of penance. This sacrament, he says, is the greatest restraining
influence they can employ; a person who neglects it will need a
miracle to rid himself of this habit. (9)
In the life of St. Philip Neri, we learn that the means he
used for curing recidives in this kind of habit was nothing else but
frequent confession. The Roman Ritual confirms this opinion in its
treatise on Penance: "For those who easily relapse into sin, it is
profitable to suggest frequent confession and, if useful, communion."
(10) In saying "those who easily relapse", it is unquestionably
speaking of those who have not yet uprooted their bad habit.
Some theologians seem as though they want to save souls through
nothing but rigorism and say that recidives are worse off if they are
absolved before progress has been made. But I would like them to tell
me if all these recidives really leave stronger and if they all im^
prove, when they are sent out without absolution and without the grace
www
71.
of the sacrament. How many times during the missions have I run a-
cross poor penitents who had been dismissed without absolution only
to give up their struggle against vice and sink into despair, not
returning to confession for several years.
But once again, a person must follow the lights given him by
God. In this matter of absolving recidives, those who are over-le-
nient are just as wrong as those who are too rigorous. In fact, they
even do more harm and are the cause of many being lost, because their
number is greater and the majority of habltuaries come to them for
confession. Still the rigorists do their share of damage, and I think
that a confessor should feel guilty not only if he absolves a person
who was indisposed, but also if he dismisses a penitent who was dis-
posed without absolving him.
I will conclude this section by making three statements. First:
I do not deny that sometimes a delay of absolution is profitable to a
disposed recidive. Secondly: it will always be possible to frighten
this kind of recidive by acting as if one cannot absolve him. Thirdly:
ordinarily speaking, for recidives who have relapsed because of their
own weakness and are now manifesting the fact that they are disposed
for absolution by some extraordinary sign, the benefit of absolution
will far outshine that of delaying absolution.
If only confessors would absolve just the recidives who give ex-
traordinary signs of sorrow. It is a sad fact that so many absolve all
recidives without distinction - without looking for an extraordinary
sign, without warning them, without even offering them a suggestion for
making progress. As a result, this wholesale harm to souls continues,
thanks to this practice and not to the practice of delaying absolution
for those who are disposed.
SEMINARIANS WITH A HABIT OF SIN
All that we have said up to now about habituaries and recidives
does not apply - ordinarily speaking - to seminarians who have a habit
of sin, especially that of impurity. There are special norms for them.
-
A lay person who is an habituary can be absolved as often as he .,
is disposed to receive the Sacrament of Penance. But the seminarian-
habituary is different, because he is headed toward Sacred Orders. It
is not enough for him to be disposed toward the sacrament of Penance;
he must also be disposed for Orders - otherwise he is disposed for
neither one. The reason is this: a person who has barely escaped from
72.
the state of sin is not fit to ascend the altar. If there is not pos-
itive proof of the progress demanded by the greatness of the state to
which he aspires, he sins gravely by willing to receive Sacred Orders,
even if he is presently in the state of grace.
For this reason, the confessor cannot absolve him unless he
promises not to receive Orders - to which he cannot ascend until he
has proven himself fit by a probation period of several months. This
has been treated at length in my Moral Theology and it is the common
opinion of theologians. (11) They teach that in order to receive
Sacred Orders, common goodness (that is, mere immunity from mortal
sin) is not enough, but a special degree of goodness is required,
namely, that by which the ordinand is free from any habit of sin.
St. Thomas teaches this when he says: "Sacred Orders demand
sanctity Hence the burden of Orders should be laid on walls that.
have already been seasoned with holiness.. .that is, those that have
drawn off the dampness of vice." (12) The reason for this is that, if
the ordinand does not have this special sanctity, he is not fit to be
set over the people to exercise the great ministry of the altar. As
St. Thomas adds: "Those who are set over the people by dignity of
their Orders should also be superior to them by virtue of their sanc-
tity." (13) And in another place he says the same thing even more
forcefully: "Through Sacred Orders men are deputed for the solemn
ministry which serves Christ Himself in the Sacrament of the altar. To
fit them for this, they need greater interior holiness than is required
even for the religious state." (14)
An exception to this must be made in favor of the seminarian
who would receive so extraordinary a compunction from God that he would
be freed of his former weakness. As the Angelic Doctor says: "Some-
times God converts the heart of man by such a strong grace that he im-
mediately and perfectly reaches spiritual sanctity." (15) Still, con-
versions like this are rare, especially in those about to be ordained.
The fact that a seminarian would seek out some religious monastery in
order to make a retreat makes little difference, for many do this -
not on their own - but because they are forced into it.
When a seminarian actually has received a great grace of this
kind from God (Whose mercy is awesome) , the confessor can absolve him.
I am referring to a grace which would change him so much that, even
though he still felt his sinful tendencies, he would feel at the same
time a tremendous repugnance for sin. He would realize that his bodily
craving was so notably diminished that with the help of grace he could
now resist temptations with ease. Furthermore, he would be fully de-
termined not only to avoid sin and the occasions of sin in the future,
73.
but he would even resolve to use every worthwhile means to lead a
priestly life- He would begin immediately to strengthen his con-
version by repeated prayers for perseverance - with such confidence
in God that the confessor could be morally certain of a profound
change in his life. The confessor can surely absolve this penitent,
even if he wants to be ordained immediately after confession.
Nevertheless, even if this kind of compunction is present, the
confessor should still do all he can to persuade him to postpone his
ordination. With such a postponement, the ordinand can effectively
uproot the bad habit and put his resolution into practice. If it
turns out that the ordinand will not postpone the ordination, the
confessor, in his role of doctor, can for the penitent's greater good
delay absolution, and thus force him to put off his ordination.
This course of action should be taken only if there is no danger
of infamy by such a delay. For if there is this danger, the penitent
has a right to be absolved right away.
Outside of this case, the confessor must be strict when it comes
to absolving ordinands who are habituaries. Afterwards they ordinarily
turn out for the worse and bring down upon the people and the Church a
great deal of harm.
1. Juenin, Commentarius de Sacramentis, diss 6, qu 77, ch 4, art 7 ;
Giordanini, Instruzione, part 1, ch 9, n. 215; Jorio, Instruzione,
ch 1, #4.
2. Benedict XIV, Apostolica, #22 (June, 1749)
3. Referring to an excommunication which existed in various dio-
ceses against those who did not fulfill the Easter Duty.
(Moriones, Spanish Edition, pg 217)
4. Bishops of Belgium cited in Croix, Theol Mor., Lib. VI, part 2,
n 1823.
74.
5. Giordanini, Instruzione, part 1, ch 15, n. 355 and ch 9, n. 213.
5. ibid, part 1, ch 15, n. 350.
7. St. Leonard of Port Maurice, Doscorso mistico e morale, n. 10.
8. Salmanticenses, tr VI, ch 5, n. 68.
9. Toledo, Instructio Sacerdotum, lib 5, ch 13, n. 6.
10. Ritual, Ordo Administr. Poenit. n. 19.
11. MT, Lib VI, n. 63, 68.
12. ST. Ilallae, qu 189, a. 1.
13. Supp. qu 35, a. 1.
14. Ilallae, qu. 184, a. 8.
15. Ilia, qu 86, a. 5.
I '
75.
CHAPTER SIX
Ce usurps
KtS Ervaii
5 r\ ra.iioY \ s,
liTipEclimririls
PENITENTS WITH RESERVEV CENSURES
If a p e r s o n comes t o co nf e s s io n who has co nt r act e d a ce ns u r e
o r a r e s e r ve d cas e , i t woul d be an act of char i t y f o r t he co nf e s s o r
wit ho u t f acu l t i e s t o t ake i t upon hims e l f t o go t o t he bi s ho p . The
bis ho p can hims e l f abs o l ve , o r de l e gat e someone t o abs o l ve ce ns u r e s
s imp l y r e s e r ve d t o t he Holy Se e . Or e l s e t he co nf e s s o r s ho u l d wr i t e
di r e ct l y t o t he Sacr e d Pe ni t e nt i ar y, i f t he abs o l u t i o n has t o come
from t he Holy Se e . The method of wr i t i ng t o t he Sacr e d Pe ni t e nt i ar y
wi l l be i ndi cat e d l at e r on i n t hi s chap t e r .
What we wi l l no t e he r e i s t hat , i f anyone i s i gno r ant of a
common law ce ns u r e , he do e s no t incu r i t ; no r does he i ncu r t he r e s -
e r vat i o n, be cau s e cas e s r e s e r ve d t o t he Pope ar e f o r t he most p ar t
r e s e r ve d AatLonz COMuAcLt. I t i s di f f e r e nt wit h e p i s co p al cas e s . Fo r
when t he cas e i s r e s e r ve d AaXtone. -6at , a p e r s o n i ncu r s i t e ve n i f he
i s i gno r ant o f t he ce ns u r e . Fu r t he r mo r e , no ce ns u r e i s i ncu r r e d by
o ne who i s i nvi nci bl y igno r ant of i t . (1)
We should mention too, that in the time of a jubilee a sac-
rilegious confession does not take away the reservation, as is
clear from the statement of Pope Benedict XXV. (2) I hold the same
thing if the confession was invalid.
But outside jubilee time, if someone makes an invalid con-
fession to a confessor who has faculties to absolve reserved cases,
it is the common and more probable opinion that he leaves absolved
from the reservation. It is more common and sufficiently probable
that the person who makes a sacrilegious confession is freed from
his reservation, as long as he did not culpably keep back the re-
served sin.
PENITENTS WITH AN OBLIGATION TO VENOUHCE
The confessor should keep in mind that he has a grave duty
to impose upon the penitent the obligation of denouncing to super-
iors anyone who is seriously guilty of heresy.or blasphemy, which
is accompanied by intellectual error and pertinacity. There is no
such obligation in the case of ignorance, carelessness, or slip of
the tongue, for then it would be enough if the penitent merely
called the error to the person's attention.
In addition to this, the confessor should insist that women
and children denounce priests who solicit them ad tuJvpi.0. or engage
in suggestive conversations with them in the confessional. In my
Moral Theology I treat this matter more at length. (3)
Regarding this obligation, the confessor should keep in mind
these practical points:
1.) He should not be too quick to impose on the penitent
the obligation of denouncing when it is a case of so-
licitation. In doubt as to whether there was solici-
tation or not, the obligation should not be imposed.
However, in these two doubtful cases, there is basis
enough for moral certainty:
a.) when the words or actions of themselves implied
solicitation and the penitent is in doubt only as re-
gards the intention of the solicitor; or b.) when there
was strong - though not certain - indication of solici-
tation , with no indication to the contrary.
I
I
I
77.
2.) Secondly the confessor should not be too quick to take
upon himself the obligation of denouncing. He could do
this in some rare instance out of charity; for instance,
when the penitent would have grave difficulty in ap-
proaching the superior.
3.) Finally the confessor should never omit imposing this
obligation of denouncing on a penitent who has been so-
licited, even though he foresees that it will not be
carried out. This obligation has been placed upon the
confessor by the Pope himself. Consequently, if the
penitent will not fulfill the obligation, the confessor
should postpone absolution. The same treatment should
be employed, if the confessor suspects that the peni-
tent will have difficulty in fulfilling the obligation.
On the other hand, it is a good idea to absolve the pen-
itent if he seriously intends to denounce as soon as he
can, even though at present he is impeded from doing so.
These denunciations should be made at least within a
month. (4)
/
PEN1TEHTS WITH MARRIAGE IMPEDIMENTS
I. When the penitent has an impediment and the marriage has
has not yet been entered into, we must make several distinctions:
A. IN NORMAL CASES
The confessor who learns of a public impediment in the con-
fessional should send the penitent to the pastor.
If the impediment is occult, the confessor himself should
offer to obtain the dispensation. In doing this bear in mind that
the local ordinary can dispense:
1.) when there is some doubt of fact regarding the impedi-
ment, if it is a case in which the Pope is accustomed
to dispense;
2.) when recourse to the Holy See is difficult and there is
danger of grave harm in delay, as long as the case is
one in which the Pope is accustomed to dispense;
78.
3.) when it is an impediment of minor degree, by virtue of
the quinquennial faculties.
If, despite these faculties, the Ordinary cannot dispense,
the confessor should have recourse to the Sacred Penitentiary.
8. IN VANGER OF VEATH OR IN CASE OF URGENCY
Ihe confessor should have recourse to the ordinary of the
place when there is danger of death (which is wider than "in aAti.-
cato moKtUs") or when it is an urgent case. This urgent case is
defined: when the impediment is discovered just when everything is
prepared for the wedding which cannot be postponed until the dis-
pensation arrives from the Holy See without probable danger of
grave harm.
In the event that this recourse to the ordinary is impossi-
ble without some really grave difficulty or without the danger of
violating the seal, the confessor himself can dispense. His power
in this case must be exercised in the act of sacramental confession
and is good only for the internal forum. It extends to every sin-
gle impediment of church law, even though they be multiple, except
these two: the impediment which proceeds from priesthood, and the
impediment that proceeds from affinity in the direct line of a con-
summated marriage.
But take note. If this is only a case of some urgency, then
he can dispense only occult impediments. If this is a case of dan-
ger of death, he can also dispense public impediments and even from
the form prescribed for marriage.
II. When the penitent has already contracted an invalid
marriage.
A. SAN AT JO IN RAVJCE. If the marriage has to be revalidated
by a Aancutio in hjxdi.ce. and only in the internal forum, the confessor
himself should write directly to the Sacred Penitentiary, since the
6anai.o is given exclusively by the Holy See.
8. SIMPLE CONY ALIO AT JON. If it is to be revalidated by a
simple convalidation, the directions we just gave concerning dis-
pensations apply. Consequently in cases where the confessor him-
self can dispense from marriage impediments, he can also revali-
date the marriage.
79.
1
The co nf e s s o r s ho u l d remember t hat f o r t hi s co nval i dat i o n,
two t hi ngs ar e ne ce s s ar y, i . e . , t he r e mo val of t he imp e dime nt - i f
t he r e i s o ne - and t he r e ne wal of co ns e nt . The p ar t y who knows o f
t he imp e dime nt i s o bl ige d t o t e l l t he o t he r of t he i nval i di t y o f
t he i r mar r i age . This i s de du ce d from t he u s u al f o r mu l a empl oyed
by t he Sacr e d Pe n i t e n t i a r y : "ut dlcXa mvJLLoAJL dt nuLUXcutZ ptviohLt,
COYU> ZiULU ceXtLo/UVtCL, <Lt(L. "
St r i c t l y s p e aking t he n, i t i s no t enough t o s ay: "If yo u
had no t o nce mar r ie d me , woul d you mar r y me now? Te l l me you wo u l d. "
Or : "Fo r my p e ace o f mind, l e t ' s r e ne w o u r f o r me r co nt r act . " Fo r
co ns e nt s l i ke t hi s de p e nd upon t he p r i o r co ns e nt which was nu l l .
Ne it he r i s i nt e r co u r s e s u f f i ci e nt , as some s ay, e ve n when i t i s do ne
wit h mar i t al i nt e nt .
I t i s a l l r i ght t o s ay ho we ve r : "Our mar r iage was i nval i d
be cau s e o f a ce r t ai n cir cu ms t ance (t he r e i s no o bl i gat i o n t o mani-
f e s t t he p r e ci s e imp e dime nt ), l e t ' s r enew o u r co ns e nt . " Or : "When
I mar r ie d yo u , I did no t have t r u e co ns e nt " (f o r no_ co ns e nt i s no t
t r u e co ns e nt ). Or : "I do u bt t he val i di t y of o u r mar r i age , s o l e t
u s co nt r act i t o ve r agai n. " In t he s e cas e s t he new co ns e nt do e s
no t depend upon t he o l d o ne .
Ho we ve r , when i t i s p r u de nt l y f e ar e d t hat t he abo ve -me nt io ne d
ways would br i ng t he cr ime i nt o t he o p e n wit h t he co ns e qu e nt dange r
o f qu ar r e l i ng, inf amy, o r s candal and o n t he o t he r hand t he o ne who
i s aware o f t he imp e dime nt co u l d no t be e xcu s e d from r e nde r ing t he
de bt - t he n, o nce t he di s p e ns at i o n has be e n gr ant e d, i t wi l l be
enough i f he u s e any o f t he ways give n above o r i f he al o ne r e ne ws
hi s co ns e nt . In s u ch a s i t u at i o n he can f o l l o w t he o p inio n which
s ays t hat hi s co ns e nt t o ge t he r wit h t he co ns e nt t he o t he r p ar t y
once gave i s enough t o co nval idat e t he mar r iage , f o r t he y s ay t hat
t he o t he r ' s co ns e nt vi r t u al l y r e mains i n t he co nt inu e d u s e o f mar -
r i age o r i n t he co nt inu e d co habi t at i o n.
HOVELS TOR WRITING TO THE SACREV PENITENTIARY
Fi r s t o f a l l , some ge ne r al no r ms . Remember t hat r e co u r s e t o
t hi s t r i bu nal i s had o nl y i n mat t e r s of t he i nt e r nal f o r u m, whe t he r
s acr ame nt al o r e xt r a-s acr ame nt al .
The addr e s s i s : Emmo. D. C ar di nal i Po e ni t e nt i ar i o Mai o r i ,
Pal azzo de i C o nve r t e ndi, Via de l l a C o nci l i azi o ne , Roma ( I t a l i a ) .
The he ading o f t he l e t t e r i s : Emmo. D. C ar dinal i Po e ni t e nt i ar i o
Maio r i, Emine nt is s ime Domine:
80 .
Then t he cas e i s s e t f o r t h, o mi t t i ng t he names and s u r name s
of t he p ar t i e s i nvo l ve d, and s u bs t i t u t i ng t he l e t t e r N. o r made-up
name s , Fabi u s , Ti t i u s , Li vi a
In e xp l ai ni ng t he cas e , t he bar e f act wit h cl ar i t y o f c i r -
cu ms t ance s i s t he f i r s t t hi ng i ndi cat e d. Then t he r e as o ns ar e
give n, and at t he e nd t he p e t i t i o n i s e xp r e s s e d.
The l e t t e r co ncl u de s wit h a f o r mu l a s o me t hing l i ke t h i s :
"Sacnam Emineniiae VeAtnae Punpunam deoAcuZon," o r "Qua pan. eAt
nevenentia me pno{iteon." Then: "EmZnentlae VeAtnae humZZZZmum
lamuZum."
Then give t he p l ace , day, mo nt h, and ye ar i n which t he r e -
qu e s t i s be i ng made . Fi nal l y t he s i gnat u r e o f t he p e t i t i o ne r . At
t he bo t t o m of t he wr i t t e n t e xt ar e no t e d t he name and addr e s s o f
t he p e r s o n t o whom t he r e s p o ns e s ho u l d be s e nt .
1.) Fo r mu l a o f r e co u r s e t o t he Sacr e d Pe ni t e nt i ar y.
Emmo. V. CandinaZZ PoenitentZanZo WaZonZ
EmZnentiAAZme Vornine:
TitZuA in excommunicaiionem incidit Sanctae Sedi AZmpZZciten
neAenvatam ob deZictum de quo in can. 2342, #1. AbAoZutuA in ca&u
uAgenti ad nonmam can. 2254 pen me ad S. PoenitentZaniam necunnit,
panatiA huiuA mandotiA Atone.
Qua pan eAt nevenentia me pno^iteon EminentZae \leAtnae
devotiAAimum.
Chicago, 29 Jul. 1951
John Voe, AacendoA.
JndZcationeA ad neAponAionem ZnAcnZbendam: U.S. Rev. John
Voe, 1472 WeZZZngton St., Chicago, JZZ.
2. ) Fo r mu l a o f r e co u r s e i n cas e s o f canon 2254.
Emmo. V. CandinaZZ PoenitenZanZo MaionZ
EminentiAAime PnincepA:
CaZuA AacendoA compZZcem Auum [veZ duoA, tneA, etc., compZZ-
ceA AUOA) in peccato tunpi AemeZ [out biA, ten, etc.] abAoZvit [veZ
81.
abAolvexe Aimulavit; out etiam: complicem Auum in peccato tuxpi,
qui peccatum complicitatiA, a quo nondum {,uexat abAolutuA, ipAO
Titio ad hoc tarn inducente, non eAt con^eAAuA).
Nunc poenitentia ductuA ad me. venit petenA abAolutionem
admiAAi cximiniA , quern ego vexAantem in COAU uxgenti abAolvi ad
noxmam can. 2254, #1.
Hoc Eminentiae VeAtxae xenuntio, Aimul Aigni{icanA Titium
libenti anirno Eminentiae VeAtxae mandatLh obedixe pa/uxtum eAAe.
Sacxam Eminentiae VeAtxae Puxpuxam deoAculox.
Chicago
H.H., AacexdoA.
Vignctux Ema. V. xeAponAum Aic mittexe: U.S. Rev. N.N.,
1742 Wellington St., Chicago, 111.
3.) Formula for requesting a dispensation from an occult
matrimonial impediment.
Emmo. V. Caxdinali Poenitcntiaxio IKaioxi
EmZnenZiAAime ac PevexendlAAlme Vominc:
CaiuA et Caia matximonium inixc cupiunt; vexum ligantux
Zmpedimento occulto, contxacto ex adultexio et pxomiAAione Aibi
invicem ^acta ^utuxi matxlmonii duxantc matximonio, quo altex-
utxa [vel utxaque) paXA pxiuA ligabatux.
Cum autem AZ diApenAatio CZA negaxetuA, pxobabile pexi-
culum adAit ne matximonium dumtaxat civile celebxatuxi Aint.
Humilitex xogatux Eminentia VeAtxa ut Aupex cximiniA
impedimenta, quod occultum eAt, eiA benigne pxovidexe dignetux.
Et VeuA, etc. (Conclude as before.)
4.) Formula for convalidating a marriage which is invalid
because of an occult impediment.
Emmo. V. Caxdinali, etc.
RU^UA contxaxit matximonium cum Plavia, cum qua adultexium
conAummavexat, mutuo {,idem Aibi danteA de matximonio intex Ae ine-
undo; quod ut celexiuA conAequexetux RufiuA, inAcia Plavia, iAtiuA
conjugi occulto moxtem pxocuxavit.
Cum impedimentum Ait omnino occultum et Aepaxatio liexi non
poAAlt abAque gxavi Acandalo et abAque pexiculo incontinentiae, ab
Eminentia VeAtxa diApenAationem Aibi neceAAaxiam humilitex e4ilagitat.
Et VeuA, etc.
-
8 2 .
5. ) Formula r e qu e s t ing a banatlo In Kadlec f o r t he in-
t e r nal forum.
Emmo. V. CoKdlnail, eta.
Sacendob Toannu Voe, United Statu, Emmae. VutKae haze
neveKenteK exponit:
W.W.W. ct U.N.N. matKimonium contnaxeKunt die 19 jut. anni
1951 -In eeetula paKoeelatl b. Uicnaelib, oppidl N., Vloeuib . V. . .
in United Statu, conam baeeKdote N.
At matKimonium hoe nullum evabit quia bacendob el abbibtenb
necUbania detegatlone caKebat; qui de
L
eetub mipeK eognitub {ult
quamvlb adhue oeeultub manet.
Cum putatl eonjugu iam pet tKU annob vitam matKimoniatem
bona {ide agant, et pKolem habeant, magna dotoKe a^ieeKentuK bi
matrimonii nuilitab elbdem bignifiicaKetuK, ut matKimonium in ^oKma
oKdinania eonvaildaKent; et idem baeeKdotl abblbtenti pKobKobum.
Quane oKatoK ab Emma. \lutKa bupplex pobtutat ut dignetuK
pKaedletum matKimonium banana in Kadiee.
Eminentiae VutKae PuKpuKam KeveKenteK deobeutoK
6.) Formula requesting a dispensation from a vow of per-
petual chastity.
Emmo. V. CoKdinatl, etc.
!
I
Titlub, cum eutitatib peKpetuae voto bit obbtKietub, et
cum In gKavl veKbetuK penieuto ineontinentlae, bupplieiteK oKat
Eminentlam VutKam, ut dignetuK oKatohi a pnae
L
ato voto dibpen-
batlonem indulgene, quo matKimonium contKaheKe pobbit.
Et Veub, etc.
7. ) For mul a r e qu e s t i ng a dis p e ns at io n from an i r r e gu l ar i t y
ar i s i ng from an o ccu l t de l i ct .
Emmo V. Candlnali, etc.
Titlub, bacehdob, In iKKegutaKitatem ineidit ob pKocunatum
aboKtum electa beeuta.
Cum ipbi bit peKieulum infiamiae bl a eetebKando abbtineat,
humliiteK ab Emlnentia \lutaa huiub iKKeguioAitatib dibpenbationem
expobeit.
SacKom Eminentiae VebtKae PunpuKam...
v
83.
d.) Whenever the confessor prudently judges that the
faculty to absolve cannot be asked from the le-
gitimate superior without serious inconvenience
to the penitent, or without danger of violating
the sacramental seal.
e.) If the penitent confesses outside the diocese where
the sin is reserved (provided the sin is not also
reserved in the diocese in which the confession is
heard), even though he left his own diocese for the
purpose of obtaining absolution. (6)
i
When the confessor has been commissioned to execute the dis-
pensation, he can use the following formula as an extension of the >
sacramental absolution: "Et in&apeA, aiictoAltate apoAtotica nuJit
conceA&a, dL&pento tecum t>apeA tmpeaUmento [cnJmiyiu>, pAoventente
ex. adattehA.0 cum contagtdtcio), at matAtmontum cum W.W. AUAAUA con-
tAokeAe poA&ki, Aenovato contenta; et pAolem, &l quam 6at>cipte&
(vet 6a6cept6ti) legitAmam decloAo. In nomine VQAAAA, etc."
FACULTIES FOR ABSOLVING RESERVED CASES
A. IN NOMAL CIRCUMSTANCES
When a penitent with a reserved censure comes to him, the
confessor should exhort him to go to confession to a priest who
has faculties to absolve from censures - or if he prefers, the
penitent can write (even via the confessor) to the competent su-
perior. But the following points should be taken into consider-
ation.
1.) The reservation of sins AOJtione &ai, both papal and
episcopal, ceases completely in these five cases:
a.) When the sick who cannot leave their house confess.
(The sickness may even be light - as long as it
keeps the patient at home.)
b.) When the penitents confess with a view to marriage,
either to be contracted or validated.
c.) When the legitimate superior has refused the fac-
ulty to absolve, when asked in an individual case.
84 .
2. ) In do u bt f u l cas e s , e i t he r do u bt o f law o r do u bt o f f act ,
t he r e s e r vat i o n do e s no t ho l d. Doubt of l aw: whe t he r o r no t t he
l aw o f r e s e r vat i o n e xt e nds t o t he p e ni t e nt ' s p ar t i cu l ar cas e . Doubt
o f f act : whe t he r he co mmit t e d i t , whe t he r i t i s gr ave o r no t , whe t h-
er" o r no t t he cir cu ms t ance s r e qu i r e d f o r t he r e s e r vat i o n ar e p r e s e nt .
This i s ce r t ai n f o r r e s e r ve d LaJtaJL 6ZnZYVU-Q.z ce ns u r e s and i s wit h
p r o babi l i t y ap p l i e d al s o t o s i ns r e s e r ve d tvztlOYlZ &UA. (c. 2245)
3. ) The co nf e s s o r s ho u l d al s o che ck t o s e e i f t he p e ni t e nt
was igno r ant of t he ce ns u r e o r of t he r e s e r vat i o n, f o r as we no t e d
abo ve , t hi s e xe mp t s t he p e ni t e nt from t he p e nal t y and from t he r e s -
e r vat i o n.
4. ) If t he co nf e s s o r , unawar e (even cu l p abl y) o f t he r e s e r -
vat i o n, abs o l ve s t he p e ni t e nt from t he ce ns u r e and from t he s i n, t he
abs o l u t io n o f t he ce ns u r e i s val i d, p r o vide d t hat i t i s no t oh hominz
o r r e s e r ve d ApzcicutUA-uno modo t o t he Holy Se e . (c. 2247 #3)
5. ) Mis s io nar ie s a t t he t ime of t he Mis s io n (and ap p ar e nt l y
a t t he t ime of t he r e t r e a t t o o ) can abs o l ve p e ni t e nt s from s i ns r e -
s e r ve d by t he bi s ho p , e ve n HOJtiOYlZ ZZYU>UJUIZ. (c. 899)
6. ) At t he t ime o f a j u bi l e e o r ho l y ye ar , t he B u l l s which
p r o mu l gat e i t u s u al l y co nce de t o co nf e s s o r s t he f acu l t i e s t o abs o l ve
from al mo s t a l l r e s e r ve d ce ns u r e s and s i ns , e ve n from t ho s e t ake n
i nt o ^0H.um conhzyitioALun, e xce p t t ho s e r e s e r ve d i>pzzJJjJLu,himo modo t o
t he Holy Se e .
B . W VANGER OE VEATH
A dange r o f de at h i s p r e s e nt when i t i s p r u de nt l y f e ar e d t hat
de at h can r e s u l t from any cau s e ; whe t he r i nt r i ns i c o r e xt r i ns i c . Ex-
amp l e s ar e : gr ave i l l n e s s , a di f f i cu l t chi l dbi r t h, a dange r o u s
j o u r ne y, and e ve n mo bi l i zat i o n o f t he army wit h t he i nt e nt o f war ,
as t he Sacr e d Pe ni t e nt i ar y de cl ar e d on March 12 and May 29, 1915.
In t hi s cas e , " al l p r i e s t s (even he r e t i c s , s chi s mat i cs , e x-
co mmu nicat e s and de gr ade d), al t ho u gh no t ap p r o ve d f o r co nf e s s i o ns ,
val i dl y and l i c i t l y abs o l ve any p e ni t e nt s (e ve n r e l i gi o u s women)
from any s i ns o r ce ns u r e s , no mat t e r how r e s e r ve d o r how no t o r i o u s
(even t ho s e r e s e r ve d 6pZzhaLi6&Ajno modo) , e ve n t ho u gh t he r e i s an
ap p r o ve d p r i e s t p r e s e nt . " (c. 882) The abs o l u t i o n from ce ns u r e s
howe ve r has i t s e f f e ct o nl y i n t he i nt e r nal f o r u m.
:
85.
I
The s o l e e xce p t io n t o t hi s f acu l t y i s t he abs o l u t io n of o ne ' s
own acco mp l ice i n a s i n of imp u r it y: whil e i t i s al ways val i d i n t he ;
dange r of de at h, i t i s no t l i c i t on t he co nf e s s o r ' s p ar t , o u t s i de |
t he cas e o f ne ce s s i t y, (c. 884)
The o ne abs o l ve d in t hi s cas e i s o bl ige d t o have r e co u r s e .
If he was abs o l ve d from an ah homiyUL ce ns u r e , he mu s t have r e -
co u r s e - o nce he has co nval e s ce d - t o t he one who i nf l i ct e d t he
ce ns u r e , o r t o hi s s u p e r i o r , s u cce s s o r , o r de l e gat e . If he was ab-
s o l ve d from a ce ns u r e 4pe.cXaXc6.6tmo modo r e s e r ve d, o r from an e x-
communicat ion i ncu r r e d by a p r i e s t who at t e mp t s e ve n a ci vi l mar -
r i age and canno t s e p ar at e from t he woman, he must have r e co u r s e t o
t he Sacr e d Pe ni t e nt i ar y o r t o t he o r dinar y o r one wit h de l e gat e d
f acu l t i e s . He mu s t s u bmit hims e l f t o them u nde r p ain o f r e - i ncu r -
r i ng t he same ce ns u r e t o e xe cu t e what e ve r t he y impos e on him. (c.
2252)
C o nce r ning t hi s r e co u r s e , no t e f ive t hi ngs :
1.) The p hr as e "once he has co nval e s ce d" means o nce t he
cau s e which p u t him in dange r of de at h has di s ap -
p e ar e d.
2. ) He mu s t have r e co u r s e wi t hi n a mo nt h' s t ime .
3. ) The co de do e s no t command t he co nf e s s o r t o admonish
t he p e ni t e nt r e gar ding hi s o bl i gat i o n of having r e -
co u r s e ; s t i l l he s ho u l d do s o , i f t he r e i s hope t hat
i t wi l l be p r o f i t abl e .
4. ) In p r a c t i c e , t hi s admo nit io n can be o mit t e d i f t he
p e ni t e nt i s ne ar de at h, o r be yo nd hope of r e co ve r y.
5. ) The r e co u r s e can be made p e r s o nal l y o r by t e l e p ho ne
o r t e l e gr ap h.
C . IN l/ERV URGENT CASES
j
A very urgent case occurs when the censure cannot be ex- 1
ternally observed without danger of grave scandal or of infamy,
or when it is hard for the penitent to remain in mortal sin dur-
ing the time necessary to reach the competent superior.
I n t h i s cas e any co nf e s s o r
t o he ar t he p e n i t e n t ' s co nf e s s i cr '
ce ns u r e s i n t he i n t e r n a l f o r u m, r.c
(c. 2254 #1)
,
;
g, o ne who has f a c u l t i e s
"^jfcsoive tcutat &zyvtQjvtLa.z.
' ,'.wr how t he y ar e r e s e r ve d.
- S-J.
C o nce r ning t h i s f acu l t y, nbt *
1. ) Al t ho u gh t he cano n che f
:
tloJL ce ns u r e s which h
s V
*
2 . )
4 . )
5. )
j c*
^v^ f o l l o wing t hi ngs :
^ s p e ak o f {VWuLaJL AZYVten-
"
:
^5cy be e n i n f l i c t e d by s e n-
*ha o p i ni o n o f Re g a t i l l o t he
t he s e t o o . (7) t e nce o r p r e c e p t , s t i - -
co nf e s s o r can abs o l ve
vjve r e co u r s e , u nde r p ai n o f
The p e r s o n abs o l ve d mu? _
a
ao nt h' s t i me t o t he
r e - i n c u r r i n g t he ce ns o r *-
co mp e t e nt s u p e r i o r .
t his o bl i gat i o n o f havi ng
3. ) The co nf e s s o r mu s t iniyo* . . . ^ g p e ni t e nt r e f u s e s t o
he canno t be abs o l ve d.
r e co u r s e o n t he p e ni t e t .
f e s s o r s ho u l d have r^"."
V
*V* - ^c, r e co u r s e t he n i s mo r -
d i f f i c u l t f o r t he co n**' . ^. f e s s o r can gi ve abs o l u t i o n
a l l y i mp o s s i bl e , and . J l . gi ca o f havi ng r e c o u r s e . He
wi t ho u t imp o s ing t he *~_ ^^At i s r e qu i r e d by l aw (s u ch
s ho u l d me r e l y have h i *
v%
* h
a
s candal , and car r y
as r e p a i r t he i nj u r y ^ impose o n him a f i t t i n g p e n-
o u t s u i t a b l e r e me di e s . . ^ ce ns u r e . Thi s p e nance
ance and s a t i s f a c t i o n
v
^,- ^
t
i
s n o
t d
o n
e i n a r e a -
s ho u l d be s o imp o s e d t n ^
t h e c o n
f
e s s o r #
t he p e n-
s o nabl e amo u nt o f t i n** ;>e nal t y.
i t e n t wi l l agai n i ncu t W>
^,*e wit h a f i c t i t i o u s name ,
Thi s r e co u r s e s ho u l d be
v ;
>f
e
s s o r , as was s a i d b e -
by l e t t e r o r t hr o u gh t he
f o r e .
fcht co nf e s s o r canno t abs o l ve i n
The o nl y ce ns u r e which
s c c a B r a n
i c a t i o n i nc u r r e d by
ve r y u r ge nt cas e s i s W co nt r act e ve n a c i v i l mar -
t he p r i e s t who p r e s u me * ^
i s
i mp o s s i bl e f o r t he
i f f o r s o me r e **
04
r i a ge t hough t he y ar e f i r ml y r e -
co u p l e t o s e p a r a t e , e w . br o t he r and s i s t e r wi t ho u t
s o l ve d t o l i ve t o ge t he r
l o s s o f c h a s t i t y .
87.
1. As can be seen this chapter has been brought into line with
present code legislation - according to the Spanish Moriones
edition of the ?/iaxM>.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Benedict XIV, encycl. Inter praeteritos, Dec. 3, 1749.
MT VI, n. 675ff.
Section on denouncing is taken from the original Pnaxti -
except the last two paragraphs were omitted in the Spanish
"pon no titan ya hoy en vtgon".
C. 1044, 1045.
C. 900 and 2247 #2 - English wording taken from A. Browne.
Institutiones Juris Canonici II, n. 979.
"A
CHAPTER VN
S
f
cm I Sl Ui
ions
THE CONFESSOR WITH CHJLVREM
With children the confessor should make it a point to be kind
and very gentle. His first duty is to find out if they know the
truths of their Faith. If they do not, he should instruct them pa-
tiently, at least with regard to those truths necessary for salva-
tion. He should do this right then and there if time allows; other-
wise he should refer them to someone else.
As to the confession itself, he should first let them confess
the sins they remember. Once this is done he might think it neces-
sary to ask the following questions, as a way of helping them examine
their consciences:
aSa&Hi Hifr
:
f'-^'^""'-"-
,
-
l!
89.
I
.
1.) Did you keep back any sins that you were afraid to tell? j
.
2.) Did you speak without respect about saints or holy days?
Did you swear to something that was not true?
3.) Did you miss Mass on Sunday or on a Holy Day? Did you
talk during Mass? Did you work on Sunday?
4.) Were you disobedient to your parents, or disrespectful
to them by making fun of them, by slapping them, by
talking back to them, or by wishing evil on them. (Re-
call here what was said in chapter two under the fourth
commandment about how children should be made to beg
forgiveness from their parents.)
5.) Did you commit any sins of impurity? On this point
the confessor should be careful in his questioning.
He should begin in fairly general terms and not go
straight to the point. First, did they use bad words?
Did they tell dirty jokes with other boys and girls?
Then he may ask if they committed any impure actions.
Often it is good, even if the child says no, to probe
a little further....How many times....Did you say
five times? He may also ask if they sleep with any-
one , and if they play with themselves when they are
in bed.
He may ask girls if they have a "crush" on some young
man, and if there have been any bad thoughts involved
in this. From the answers he gets, he can go on to
further questions. But he should never ask a boy or
girl if he or she reached an orgasm. It is better to ^s
go without material integrity, than tell them about
something they do not know and just arouse their
curiosity. (1)
6.) Did you steal anything, or damage anything that be-
longed to another?
7.) Did you tell the secret sins of someone else?
8.) As to the precepts of the church: did you fulfill the
law regarding confession and Easter Duty? Did you eat
meat on abstinence days?
90.
When it comes to absolving children, once again a good deal
of care is reuqired.
If you are fairly sure that they have sufficient use of rea-
son, they should be absolved if they are properly disposed. You can
judge their use of reason by various indications; for instance, how
distinctly they confess their sins and how adequately they answer
your questions, how aware they are of the consequence of sin - that
it offends God and merits Hell for them. If they are recidives in
mortal sin, they should be treated as adults: that is, if they do
not show extraordinary signs of sorrow, absolution should be put
off.
If you doubt whether the child has perfect use of reason, he
should be absolved conditionally when he is in danger of death or
when he needs absolution in order to make his Easter Duty. Signs
that he has not reached the use of reason are: he doesn't remain
composed in the confessional but looks around, fiddles with his
hands, and brings up things not connected with confession. He
should be absolved conditionally too if he confesses something
doubtfully mortal. Conditional absolution is all right when there
is a just cause for it and here the possibility of freeing this
child from a doubtful state of sin is certainly a just cause. Even
if the child is recidive, he should be so absolved. Absolution
should be delayed for those who have the perfect use of reason, as
a way of having them return properly disposed. But this hope is
not to be found in children who lack the use of reason.
/
Many moralists teach (with probability) that a doubtfully
disposed child like this can be absolved conditionally even if he
confesses only venial sin - at least after a space of two or three
months. This is so that he will not go for a long time without
the grace of the sacrament, or perhaps even without sanctifying
grace, if he has forgotten to confess some mortal sin.
The confessor should see to it that these youngsters make
the act of sorrow necessary to receive absolution. For instance,
he could put it to them in the guise of a little talk: "Do you
love God Who is so great and so good - the God Who created you and
died for you? You have hurt this God and now He wants to forgive
you. Make an act of hope that He will forgive you out of love for..
Jesus Who died for you. But do you know that your sins deserve
Hell? Say with me: My God, I do not ever want to offend You again,
etc."
91.
I
The penance imposed on children should be as light as pos- j
sible. The confessor should insist that they say it as soon as
possible. Otherwise they will forget about it or skip it. He
should try especially to instill into children a devotion to the
Mother of God, urging them to say the rosary every day and to say
the three Hail Mary's morning and night with this ejaculation: "My
Mother, keep me from mortal sin."
With regard to a child's vocation, a confessor must never
decide it for him. He may prudently determine which state in life
he thinks God wants the child to embrace, and then try to persuade
him to embrace that state - but that is all.
If he is dealing with someone who wants to enter religion,
the confessor's first obligation is to examine the order which he
wants to enter, for if it is a lax order, it would be better (or-
dinarily) to remain in the world. Once he joins such an order he
will begin to act like the others, and the hopes he had will be
lost sight of. Unfortunately this has happened to many.
But if the child wants to enter a fervent order, the confes-
sor should test the vocation by making the following inquiries: as
to impediments that will bar him from entering, as to health, as to
parents who may need his help. Most important of all he should
evaluate the child's reasons for wanting to enter. Is it a good
one - such as, to unite himself to God, to make reparation for his
former life, to avoid the dangers of the world? Or is the prin-
cipal motive a worldly one - such as, to lead an easier life, to
be free of his family's hard lot, or to please his parents who are
forcing him into it? If his motive is a bad one, the confessor
must see to it that he does not enter religion, for there is no
real vocation. And entering religion without a vocation would have
a disastrous outcome. If, on the other hand, the motive is good
and there is no impediment, neither the confessor nor anyone else
should deter him from following his vocation. St. Thomas even says
that to do so would be a grave sin. However sometimes it is a
prudent thing for the confessor to delay the entrance, in order to
make sure this is a firm and lasting resolution. This is especially
true if he knows that the youngster is flighty. It is also true
if the decision was made at the time of a mission or a retreat, for
in a burst of fervor the child could very well make a resolution
which lacked solid foundation.
If it is a boy who wants to become a diocesan priest, the
confessor should not be quick to agree without a long and thorough
t e s t o f t he young man's u p r ight mo t ive s , of hi s kno wl e dge , o r cap a-
b i l i t i e s . Dio ce s an p r i e s t s have t he s ame , and e ve n gr e at e r o bl i ga-
t i o ns t han r e l i gi o u s have , and ye t t he y must l i ve s u r r o u nde d by t he
dange r s o f t he wo r l d. C o ns e qu e nt l y, t o be a good dio ce s an p r i e s t ,
he must be car e f u l t o l e ad an e xe mp l ar y l i f e - cu t o f f from t he
wo r l d' s p l e as u r e s and from s i nf u l men and give n t o p r aye r and f r e -
qu e nt ing o f t he s acr ame nt s . But qcuA Zi fvcc z cuxdabmu& zum?
Wit ho u t t hi s t he dio ce s an p r i e s t wi l l p l ace hims e l f i n a s t at e of
al mo s t ce r t ai n damnat io n, e s p e ci al l y i f he t ake s on t hi s l i f e in
o r de r t o s at i s f y t he ambit io ns of hi s p ar e nt s . (We me nt io ne d be -
f o r e - in chap t e r two - how s e r io u s a s i n p ar e nt s commit by f o r cing
t he i r chi l dr e n t o e nt e r t he r e l i gi o u s l i f e o r t he p r i e s t ho o d agai ns t
t he i r own cho i ce . )
As t o gi r l s who want t o co ns e cr at e t he i r vi r gi ni t y t o J e s u s
C hr i s t , t he co nf e s s o r s ho u l d no t p e r mit them t o make a p e r p e t u al
vow o f chas t i t y u nl e s s he i s s u r e t hat t he y l e ad a vi r t u o u s l i f e ,
ar e we l l acqu aint e d wit h as ce t i cal p r i nci p l e s , and e s p e ci al l y give
t ime t o p r aye r . At f i r s t , he s ho u l d al l o w them t o make a vow of
chas t i t y o nl y f o r a t i me , s ay from o ne f e as t t o ano t he r .
Fi nal l y, two t hi ngs s ho u l d be r e cal l e d wit h r e gar d t o t ho s e
who want t o o r mu s t ge t mar r ie d. (I s ay "mu s t " in r e f e r e nce t o
i nco nt i ne nt p e r s o ns who wi l l u s e no o t he r means of r e s t r ai ni ng
t he ms e l ve s bu t mar r iage . ) Fi r s t of a l l , p ar e nt s s i n who wit ho u t
j u s t cau s e s t and in t he way of a s u i t abl e mar r iage f o r t he i r c hi l -
dr e n. Se co ndl y, chi l dr e n s i n (and co ns e qu e nt l y t he co nf e s s o r mu s t
f o r bid i t ) when t he y wis h t o e nt e r a mar r iage which br i ngs shame
on t he i r f amil y. I t i s wrong t o o f o r them t o wis h t o co nt r act a
mar r iage which t he i r p ar e nt s ar e agai ns t (even t ho u gh i t i s no t
s hame f u l bu t wi l l p r o ve a s candal t o them) u nl e s s t he chi l dr e n
have an e xcu s ing cau s e . This mat t e r I have cl ar i f i e d i n my Moral
The o l o gy. (2)
THE CONFESSOR ANV THE SCRUPULOUS
Many au t ho r s give r u l e s f o r de al i ng wit h t he s cr u p u l o u s p e n-
i t e nt s . Bu t ce r t ai nl y t he gr e at e s t remedy af t e r t hat of p r aye r i s
o be die nce t o t he i r di r e ct o r . Fat he r Se gne r i cal l s t hi s t he o nl y
r e me dy, in f act . From t hi s flow two imp o r t ant r u l e s .
1.) The co nf e s s o r must co nvince t he s cr u p u l o u s p e r s o n t hat
i t i s al ways s af e be f o r e God t o obey hi s s p i r i t u a l d i -
r e ct o r whe r e t he r e i s no s u r e s i n. In do ing t h i s , he
93.
is not obeying man, but God Himself who says: He who
hears you, hears Me. This is the teaching of St. Ber-
nard, St. Antoninus, St. Francis de Sales, St. Philip
Neri, St. Teresa, St. John of the Cross, St. Ignatius
Loyola, Blessed Dennis the Carthusian, Blessed Humbert,
Venerable Master Avila, Gerson, and countless others.
2.) The penitent must be convinced that the only anxiety he
should have is in not obeying. Scrupulosity exposes
them to the danger of losing not only their peace of
mind, their devotion and progress in virtue, but even
their sanity and above all their soul. Scrupulosity
can grow to such proportions that they are driven to
despair, and end up (as frequently happens) taking
their own life or letting down all barriers against sin.
The confessor must try to get it across to the scrupulous
person that God does not weigh every least detail of our lives. He
wants us during life to be uncertain about our salvation for our
own good. We try/ as best we can not to offend Him, and then leave
the rest to His Mercy. We admit that we cannot save ourselves
without the help of His Grace and so we pray for it with perse-
verance, confidence, and peace of mind. St. Francis de Sales once
said: "It is a good idea for us to close our eyes in the darkness
and difficulties of life and walk through them under God's loving
care. We should be at peace if our spiritual director tells us we
are doing well and let it go at that. The obedient man will never
be lost." (3) St. Philip Neri assures the scrupulous penitent that
he will never have to give God an account of his actions if he obeys
his confessor. (4) St. John of the Cross calls it a mark of pride
and lack of faith for a person not to trust the advice of his con-
fessor. (5)
Because of all this, the confessor should speak very often
to the scrupulous penitent of the confidence he should have in
Jesus Christ Who died for our salvation, and in His most holy
Mother whose great power is at the mercy of those who come to her
for help. The confessor should try to' get him to be convinced of
the certainty of his salvation whenever he runs to Jesus and Mary
who are ready to hear every prayer addressed to them.
The confessor should forbid them to read books which in-
crease their anxiety and to mix with other scrupulous persons. If
one of them is troubled with terrible guilt-feelings, he may even
forbid him to attend sermons on terrifying subjects. He may even
forbid him to examine his conscience in regard to the things that
trouble him irrationally.
.' vfMniiv.iiWiltm^V
94.
If the scruple is nothing more than the fear of giving into
bad thoughts (as for instance, against faith or purity or charity)
the confessor should not hesitate to disregard it.and assure the
penitent that these thoughts are trials and that there is not con-
sent or sin.
In this matter, the confessor should use the rule: when a
person has a tender conscience, he should be presumed not to have
committed the sin unless he is extremely certain that he has. As
Father Alvarez says, such a terrible thing cannot happen to one
who hates sin without its being clearly recognized. Consequently,
it is sometimes good to forbid the penitent to accuse himself of
such thoughts again, unless he is sure and can testify under oath
that he consented to them.
The confessor should take note that the scrupulous are not
to be guided by particular rules but by very general ones. Par-
ticular rules will never help him reach the point where he can
guide himself. He will always doubt whether or not it applies to
this case. For the present circumstances will always seem a bit
different from what the confessor had in mind.
The anxiety may be concerning past confessions - whether or
not he sufficiently explained all the sins or circumstances, or
whether he was sorry. If it comes to the confessor's attention
that the penitent has made a general confession once before or for
a notable time has constantly repeated certain things of the past,
he should forbid him ever to think about these again. He should
also tell him never again to confess his past sins unless he is
ready to swear that they were certainly mortal sins and that they
were certainly never confessed. When confession brings with it
such inconvenience and danger, the scrupulous penitent is not
bound to preserve material integrity - at least when there is any
doubt about it - even if he forgets to mention a mortal sin. The
authors teach that the anxiety that troubles him is more than
enough to excuse from integrity.
The confessor should make sure that the penitent obeys him
with exactness. If he does not obey, he should be reprimanded,
deprived of Holy Communion and treated severely. The ordinary
thing, of course, is to treat the scrupulous with kindness, but
when it comes to obedience, severity has to be used. If they lose
hold of this one life raft, they will sink into insanity or into
a life of sin.
ful.
Some scrupulous persons fear that everything they do is sin-
In counseling one like this, the confessor should command him
95.
to act without restraint and overcome his anxiety. He should tell
him that his first obligation is to conquer his scruples, whenever
what he is doing is not clearly sinful. This is what the moralists
along with Father Segneri teach. (6) Some object that this is tell-
ing him to act in a state of doubt because the scruple is not set-
tled, but their objection is invalid. It is almost impossible to
expect the scrupulous to do such a thing. Their fear is not a true
dictate of conscience (a formed conscience as Gerson calls it) , nor
is it a true practical doubt. It does not destroy the judgment
previously made and virtually enduring, even though now, under the
pressure of the anxiety, it is not adverted to. This judgment went
like this: I do not sin by doing what I am not certain is_ sin. In
acting, then, he does not go against this judgment but against his
groundless fear. For this reason, the confessor may command the
scrupulous to conquer their anxiety and disregard it by freely do-
ing whatever it tells them not to do. And he may assure the peni-
tent that he need never confess such a thing.
THE CONEESSOR ANV THE VEVOUT /
Those who are devout and go to Communion frequently should
ordinarily be urged to receive the Sacrament of Penance once a
week.
If such a penitent were to confess only imperfections and
nothing was clearly a venial sin, he can be absolved conditionally,
according to Bonacina. However I think this should not be allowed
except on very rare occasions when they cannot - or cannot easily -
mention something from their past life which would be certain mat-
ter. It is my opinion too that if the penitent does not present
certain matter, the confessor is not obliged to go to the trouble
of questioning him in order to absolve. And if he has inquired ^
and found nothing, he is not obliged to give absolution, even con-
ditionally. This, I repeat, happens when the penitent confesses
faults which are only doubtfully venial sins.
It is different when the penitent confesses things that are
certainly venial sins, even though of common or daily occurrence - ,.
such as impatience, intemperance, distractions in prayer, and so
forth. In order to absolve this penitent, the confessor must check
to see if he occasionally puts forth effort to conquer the bad hab-
it. If he does, the confessor can make the judgment that his faults
flow from human weakness rather than from a lack of sorrow or re-
solve. If, on the other hand, he falls back into these faults
i
96.
frequently and without resisting them, he can be treated as a re-
cidive as we mentioned in chapter five.
The confessor should never forbid his penitents, especially
women, to go to another confessor. If he discovers that they have
gone to another, he must show no sign of being displeased. In fact,
it would be a good idea for him to tell them occasionally to con-
fess to someone else. One exception to this comes to mind - a per-
son who is very scrupulous should not be told to go to another
priest if the confessor prudently fears that another confessor who
did not know the situation would cause the penitent to lose his
peace of mind. The confessor finally should' never manifest a de-
sire to direct a particular individual.
He should never speak unnecessarily about the mistakes of
other confessors. He should sincerely try to excuse them from the
mistakes they make.
The confessor should not undertake the direction of a person
who wants to leave his present director unless there is an urgent
reason for it. So, St. Philip Neri, St. Francis de Sales, St.
Charles Borromeo, and others. (8) This kind of thing is the cause
of all kinds of disturbance, dissipation, and even of scandal.
Just because a penitent dislikes his present confessor is not rea-
son enough to change. Neither is a lack of confidence in him suf-
ficient, for, as St. Teresa says, this is often a temptation of
the devil. (9) St. Francis de Sales says on this point: "The con-
fessor should not be changed without a grave reason." (10) This
is the general rule - but it is not necessary to hold this abso-
lutely, if some legitimate cause (less than grave) for changing is
present.
Lack of holiness is, as St. Teresa says, a just reason for
changing confessors. "If the confessor seems inclined to vanity,
he may be changed, for if he is vain, he will make others vain."
(11) The confessor's lack of knowledge can also be a just cause
for changing, but there should be some clear proof of this. Fi-
nally she points out that it is never wrong - and in fact it is
very advantageous - to consult other directors about problems at
times.
The confessor should be careful to show no partiality for
one penitent. Some priests become involved with a particular pen-
itent, and they end up devoting all their time, attention, and
zeal to her. We do not deny, surely, that some penitents need more
help than others. But help is one thing - involvement or attachment
I 97.
Brfhich takes time and attention away from others is quite another.
It would be a good idea for the confessor to set aside a particu-
I
lar day or time which will not inconvenience his other penitents
for the one who needs extra help.
I
In hearing the confessions of devout persons, the confes-
sor should never talk too loudly even if he is not talking about
sins. If he were to do this, others would be afraid to confess
I
their sins for fear that the confessor would speak just as loudly
to them. (12)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>.$. He should not let devout young women go about visiting
churches in such a way that they stay in church enough to cause
anxiety to their parents. He should urge them rather to prepare
themselves for married life by helping with the housework.
In regard to the way a confessor should guard against famil-
iarity with his penitents, see what we have to say in the next
chapter. And for more details on how to direct devout souls, see
the whole ninth chapter.
THE CONFESSOR AMP PEAF-MUTES
If a penitent is deaf - and as ordinarily happens - mute al-
so, the confessor should take him to a private room for confession,
in order to allow him the freedom to express his sins and his sor-
row in signs, as best he can. It might be a good idea before hear-
ing his,, confession to ask the man's friends if he has any vices and
how-to go about communicating with him. Then in the confessional,
as soon as he recognizes some particular sin and some sign of sor-
row , the confessor should give him absolution. But I would say:
always absolve conditionally unless there is moral certainty about
his dispositions.
-.vi
As to a person who cannot speak, in our opinion he is bound
to express his confession in writing if he knows how to write. When
a person is bound to a certain end, he is bound also to the ordin-
ary means of attaining that end. Note I said "ordinary". Writing
would not be an ordinary means if it would entail a serious incon-
venience to the mute person, or if there existed the danger that
his sins might become known.
98.
If a deaf person or one who is hard of hearing should come
to confession and the confessor does not realize he or she is deaf
until he begins to question him in the course of the confession,
it is a doubtful procedure to tell him in a loud voice to come
back at some other time or place. This case often comes up during
the missions and is sometimes a source of great worry to the mis-
sionary.
I think the thing should be handled like this. If the con-
fessor knows from the beginning that the person is, deaf, then he
can tell him to come back at another time. But if he notices this
only after the confession is under way - from the way the penitent
answers questions - the confessor must not then tell him to return
in a voice so loud that those near the confessional would hear.
This would surely give them the idea that the penitent had con-
fessed some serious or doubtfully serious sin. Consequently, in
this case, once he has some indication of the required dispositions
he may absolve him absolutely - even if he confessed a mortal sin.
If the dispositions are not apparent, then he should absolve con-
ditionally. Lest he break the seal, he need not try to get more
certainty as to the dispositions nor tell him to return. Finally,
he should impose a light penance, because the loud voice he must
use to give the penance will be overheard by others.
THE CONFESSOR ANV THE WING
In hearing the confessions of the dying, the confessor should
not be too demanding as to the number and circumstances of the sins,
especially if a priest has already arrived with Viaticum or if the
doctor insists that Viaticum be given quickly. It is better at a
time like this to worry about the dispositions of the penitent than
about the integrity of the confession. It would be enough if he
merely told the sick man to repeat the confession when he feels
better. The penance should be very light: it makes no difference
whether the confessor imposes a proportionate one to be said after
convalescence or whether he tells the man to come back after con-
valescence.
For someone who ordinarily cannot be without an attendant -
for example a wounded person or a woman in labor - it is enough if
they accuse themselves of sinfulness in general or mention in par-
ticular only some venial fault, always of course with the intention
of confessing integrally upon recovery.
I
9 9 .
The co nf e s s o r s ho u l d no t e t hat , i f t he dying man i s bo u nd t o
i r e s t i t u t i o n and i s abl e t o do i t a t t he t ime , he s ho u l d be
>ld t o make i t r i ght away. I t i s no t s u f f i ci e nt f o r him me r e l y t o
e t hi s t as k t o hi s h e i r s . If he r e f u s e s t o make t he r e s t i t u -
, abs o l u t i o n s ho u l d be de nie d him.
t
l f t he word Viat icu m wo u l d de s t r o y t he dying man' s p e ace o f
, i t i s p e r mi s s i bl e f o r t he p as t o r t o give him t he Eu char i s t -
3t wit h t he wo r ds : Ac.CX.pe., tyuvtMl, \J-ioJticiM - bu t wit h t he r e gu l ar
}nu l a f o r communion: CoipuA VotniiU, YlOA&u., e t c.
If i n t he co nf e s s o r ' s j u dgme nt t he dying man i s a t t he p o i nt
hAr e he s ho u l d r e ce i ve Ext r e me Unct io n and ye t he r e f u s e s , t he
iHmendous e f f e ct s of t he s acr ame nt s ho u l d be made cl e ar t o him. I t
i ve s , f o r i ns t ance , s t r e ngt h t o r e s i s t t he de v i l ' s t e mp t at i o ns i n
bas e l a s t moments o f l i f e . I t f r e e s from ve ni al s i n, and e ve n
Mm mo r t al s i n i f he has f o r go t t e n t o co nf e s s one and i t i s s t i l l
n hi s s o u l . I t e ve n give s bo di l y he al t h i f t hi s i s e xp e di e nt f o r
ha s o u l ' s we l f ar e . But t hi s he al t h wi l l no t be give n i f t he dying
\m wai t s u nt i l r e co ve r y i s imp o s s ibl e wi t ho u t a mi r acl e . The s ac-
rament f o l l o ws t he o r di nar y co u r s e of t hi ngs by r e i nf o r ci ng t he
u r al means o f r e co ve r y.
I
If in spite of all this, the sick man still refuses to be
t
inted, many authors teach - and with great probability - that
commits mortal sin. It would be a sin against charity to him-
f, since he further deprives himself of something he needs so
ch to strengthen himself.
nu c
I
THE CONFESSOR ANP THE COHVEMHEV CRIMINAL
Wit h condemned cr i mi nal s t he co nf e s s o r mu s t empl oy t he
at e s t . ' char i t y and p at i e nce .
When he f i r s t v i s i t s t he man, t he co nf e s s o r s ho u l d t r y t o
Mt acr o s s t o him t he ide a t hat de at h i s act u al l y a gi f t from God
TOo want s hi m. t o be s ave d. He s ho u l d t e l l him t hat a l l o f u s have
t o l e ave t he wo r l d s oon anyway in o r de r t o e nt e r an e t e r ni t y which
U r
" "
Even though you admit t hat you are unworthy of s u r ah!
W
r t
,
Y
- ~
ct ^Lo d
t U1
""**
t 0
^
M y
U
- ^ ^2n fe^n/ry
96
'
r and^wanT^o t h^Il s e s T y ^ " *< ~ - ^ - o r
help him
n
m4e
th
: S l ^ v ^ ^ ^ t T ^ L <? ^ "
t o come t o you and t o have you wSoome HL Th !? """a " ' "
a
"
t e d
is r e al l y the pledge of future g!or Tr ^ i J a is it h T " *
can you be af r aid' Reirnoo K
Q
,- ,
l t h y o u
'
h o w
di s c' This is ^hy X ^ J S ^ T S S Z e n t ^ t * ^ ^
My Lord, my l o ve , I embrace You. I St ar t You r T I' ^
H i m s
hope t o love You forever. I am sorry" Sat T h ^
U
'
M d X
ever time is l e f t me now on eartd^ T a T f i J l v T , " **
W h a t
"
i t in loving You." ' ^
f l r m l y d e t
^ n e d t o spend
"My J e s u s , wil l ingl y do I offer
m
n
f o
, .
Pleases You t o take i t . Your Will be done r K *
V 1 C t l m
'
i f l f c
trz 5 2 srra - S S r^S ? -
s han
e
no t ahandon you - t he r l f o r e TSd, wt ^ ^ J ^
EXTREME UNCTION
Due t o the f act t hat Extreme Unction is the l as t Sacrament,
St . Thomas cal l s i t the crown of the s p ir it u al l i f e . (11) By i t
man is made ready and is disposed to e nt e r his heavenly home. For
t iiis r eason, t his sacrament should be conferred while the sick man
w
"-V
184
is still mentally alert - so that it may be a greater benefit to
him. Although it cannot be conferred unless there is a grave dan-
ger of death (at least a probable danger) - still it should not be
put off until the very last moment. The Roman Catechism says that
priests sin gravely if the confer Extreme Unction when there is no
longer any hope of life and when the sick person has already lost
consciousness. (12)
The priest should try to convince the sick man that Extreme
Unction is not only good for his soul, but even for the health of
his body, as Trent says: Where it is beneficial for the soul, it
sometimes obtains health for the body. (13) However, this cure
will not take place when it is naturally speaking impossible to re-,
cover one's health. John Heroldus speaks of one dead man to whom
it was revealed that, if he had received Extreme Unction earlier,
he would have been cured of his sickness immediately, but because
it was postponed he had died and been condemned to the fire of pur-
gatory for a hundred years.
Extreme Unction takes away the remnants of sin and as a con-
sequence any hidden mortal sins, as St. Thomas teaches. (14) Con-
sequently, the patient should be told that, as the five senses are
being anointed, he should be sorry for the sins committed through
each of them and should - together with those in the room - answer
"Amen".
Extreme Unction gives special help with which to crush the
power and the temptations of the devil in one's last agony. For
this reason, it is very probable that a person commits a grave sin
in refusing to receive this sacrament.
As to administering this sacrament. It is only speculativel
probable that it is enough to administer the Sacrament with one dro
of oil, not spreading it over the parts. In practice, however, thi
cannot be done for it would not be a true anointing.
The anointing of the five senses, according to the more com-
mon opinion, is necessary for the sacrament. Therefore, only in
time of plague or in an imminent danger of death can a person use
just one anointing on one sense, preferably on the head. He should
do this with the abbreviated formula: ?2A JJ>am Aanctam unctLonW
InduZgtat tibl VonUnuA qcUdqiUd d2ZlquJj>L. Amen. (15) if the pa-
tient recovers, the anointing should be repeated on all five senses
with the prescribed prayers.
185.
I t i s no t ne ce s s ar y f o r t he v a l i d i t y o f t he s acr ame nt t o gi ve
a t wo - f o l d ano i nt i ng t o t he t wo - f o l d p a r t s . I t i s e no u gh f o r l i c e i t y
t o ano i nt o nl y o ne e ye , o ne hand, e t c . , when t he r e i s dange r o f i n -
f e ct i o n o r s o me t hing p r e ve nt i ng t he p e r s o n f r o m be i ng mo ve d. Ano i nt -
ing o f t he f e e t , acco r di ng t o t he common o p i ni o n, i s no t ne ce s s ar y
f o r t he s acr ame nt , bu t t he C hu r ch' s cu s t o m r e gar di ng t h i s s ho u l d be
r e ve r e d. Al s o , i t i s no t ne ce s s ar y f o r t he v a l i d i t y o f t he s a c r a -
me nt t o mai nt ai n t he r i g h t o r de r i n ano i nt i ng t he p a r t s . S t i l l o ne
co mmit s a gr ave s i n by no t o bs e r vi ng t h i s o r de r .
Ext r e me Unct io n can p r o p e r l y be gi ve n t o chi l dr e n who have
t he u s e o f r e as o n, e ve n i f t he y have no t ye t r e ce i ve d Communion.
When i n do u bt abo u t t he u s e o f r e as o n, t he Sacr ame nt can be admin-
i s t e r e d c o ndi t i o na l l y. Thi s ho we ve r canno t be do ne f o r t ho s e who
c e r t a i nl y do no t have t he u s e o f r e as o n.
Ext r e me Unct i o n can be gi ve n t o t he i ns ane and t o t he d e l i r -
i o u s , who have o nce had t he u s e o f r e as o n, have give n some s i gn o f
t h e i r p r o p e r d i s p o s i t i o n s , and have as ke d f o r i t - o r ve r y l i k e l y
wo u l d have as ke d - o r gi ve n some s i gn o f c o n t r i t i o n - as l o ng as
dange r o f i r r e ve r e nc e i s r e mo t e . I t can c e r t a i nl y be gi ve n i f t he y
have a l u ci d i n t e r v a l . I n do u bt as t o whe t he r t he p e r s o n e ve r had
t he u s e o f r e as o n, i t can be gi ve n c o ndi t i o na l l y . The same ho l ds
, f o r t ho s e who ar e dr u nk and i n dange r o f de at h, u nl e s s i t i s c l e a r
. t h a t t he y we r e i n mo r t al s i n when t he y l o s t co ns ci o u s ne s s . I t s ho u l d
be de ni e d abs o l u t e l y t o t ho s e who ar e i mp e ni t e nt , t o t ho s e who di e
j . i n e vi de nt s i n , and t o t he e xco mmu nicat e d as t he Roman Ri t u al war ns .
e
(16) I t can be gi ve n t o women i f t he y ar e i n dange r o f de at h f r o m
c h i l db i r t h .
In cas e o f n e c e s s i t y , t he p r e s c r i be d p r aye r s which ar e no t
p a r t o f t he f o r m can be o mi t t e d. The s e s h a l l be s ai d af t e r war ds i f
_ t he r e i s any t i me . I n s u ch a cas e t he s acr ame nt can be gi ve n wi t h-
v
o u t candl e s , and a l s o p r o babl y wi t ho u t s u r p l i c e and s t o l e .
s
;
f
Extreme Unction cannot be repeated in the same sickness un-
less the patient has probably recovered since the last anointing
and has now fallen into another critical condition, as Trent
teaches.
The priest should be careful in moving the sick person into
2
t
position for anointing. However, if he is careful in moving him
and the person happens to die, the priest does not incur an irreg-
.', ularity. An irregularity cannot be incurred except by a crime and
there is certainly no crime here when he is doing something incul-
pably and out of charity.
, -
9
186.'
Finally, pastors can licitly keep the holy oils in their
homes at night, whenever they foresee the probable danger of be-
ing called to give Extreme Unction and the oils not being handy.
SUGGESTIONS TOR THE AGONY ANV MOMENT OF PE A T H
I
I
I
I
I
When t he s ick man r e ache s hi s ago ny, t he p r i e s t s ho u l d he l p I
him as much as he can. He s ho u l d r e p e at e dl y s p r i nkl e t he man wit h I
ho l y wat e r , e s p e ci al l y i f he i s t r o u bl e d wit h di abo l i cal t e mp t at io ns
and s ay: "Ex-SuAgat VZLLi zt dlAAlpzntuA Intmlcl ZA.U6."
He s ho u l d s t r e ngt he n him wit h t he s ign o f t he cr o s s and bl e s s
him wit h t he words: "So.nzcU.cat tz Vzu6 PatOA qui tz cAzavll; bznz-M
dlcat tz &lllu6 qui tz Kzdzmit; bznzdlcat tz SplhlXiu Sanctum."
1
He s ho u l d give him a p i ct u r e t o ho l d and t o ki s s - a p i ct u r
of J e s u s and Mary.
He s ho u l d make s u r e t he p e r s o n gains a l l t he indu l ge nce s he I
can, and e s p e ci al l y s ho u l d he be s u r e t o imp ar t t o him t he bl e s s i ndj
at t he moment of de at h o f B e ne dict XIV wit h i t s p l e nar y indu l ge nce .
The p o p e gave t o bis ho p s and t o t ho s e t he y woul d de l e gat e , t he f ac- *
u l t y o f imp ar t ing a p l e nar y indu l ge nce t o t he s i ck who as k f o r i t , I
af t e r t he y have r e ce ive d Pe nance , Eu char i s t , and Ext r eme Unct io n -
o r , i f t he y ar e u nco ns cio u s , af t e r t he y have give n some s ign o f s o
row. However, i t i s no t t o be give n t o t he e xco mmu nicat e d, t o t he I
imp e nit e nt , o r t o t ho s e who die in e vide nt mo r t al s i n. (18)
Re p e at e dl y t he p r i e s t s ho u l d s u gge s t t ho u ght s of co mp u nct io
co nf o r mit y, hope i n C hr i s t ' s Pas s io n and in Mar y' s i nt e r ce s s i o n, an
de s i r e o f s e e ing God. The p r i e s t however s ho u l d be car e f u l t o p au
t o give t he man t ime t o t hink abo u t i t and t o r e s t .
He s ho u l d make s u r e t hat t he p e ni t e nt s ays t he names o f J e s
and Mary o ve r and o ve r ,
no t p r o no u nce t hem.
He s ho u l d s ay them in hi s he ar t i f he can
I
nc
1
I
)OCi
When he reaches his agony, the priest should have those ne;
by say the Litany of the Blessed Virgin for him. It is also a gooc
idea to have the bell tolled so that others will realize that some-
one is dying and pray for him; this can have a good effect even on I
those who are not sick. It should be mentioned that, in general,
when a person has lost consciousness, prayers do far more good than
words.
I
I
187.
When death draws near, the priest should recite the custom-
ary prayers that are found in the Ritual in a reverent tone and
kneeling beside the bed.
Even though it is allowed to touch the person's hands, feet,
etc., to see if they have grown cold or whether they have lost their
feeling-power, still he should be careful not to do it so often as
to disturb him. Nor should one try to move a person in agony, for
that can hasten death.
As long as the sick person is in sure possession of his
senses, it is a good idea, after disposing him, to give him absolu-
tion frequently, in order to be more sure about his being in the
state of grace, in case the previous confessions were invalid, or
at least to increase his store of grace and lessen the punishments
of purgatory. If he should happen to fall into mortal sin at this
time, be careful not to frighten him, but urge him to call on the
names Of Jesus and Mary. If he is tempted again, strengthen him
with all kindness, get him to make an act of contrition, and immed-
iately absolve him. Once he loses consciousness and shows no signs
of sorrow or desire for absolution, it would not be right to absolve
him many times within the same day, for even to absolve condition-
ally you need an urgent and weighty reason. Consequently the right
thing would be to let a notable space of time intervene. However,
in this the priest's procedure should depend on the man's conscience
as he knew it. If the man had the habit of bad thoughts, if he is
dying from an injury, if he has been involved in some deep hatred
or an illicit love affair, if his sickness has been extremely pain-
ful and he has not accepted it willingly - for any of these reasons
he could be absolved more often. It is all right to let only three
or four hours intervene. It can be done even more frequently if he
is about to die. It is a good idea to ask the sick person, while
he can understand you, to give some set sign, when he wants absolu-
tion or when the priest wants to give it. Such as to close his eyes
or open them, lift his hand, bend his head, and so forth.
Lastly, when it appears that he has died, the priest should
be careful not to give the signal of death immediately, nor close
his eyes or mouth immediately or cover his face with a piece of
cloth. For if he were not yet dead, this would hasten his death.
However, when it is evident that the soul has gone into eternity,
the priest should ask everyone to pray for him and kneeling he
should say the prayer "SuhvdYlLtz" which is found in the Ritual or
in the back of the breviary.
188,
:
.THE MOMENT OF VEATH
The priest should encourage the sick man to make affections
of faith, hope, love, sorrow for sin - as were previously given.
When he is just about to die, the priest should suggest the follow-
ing: "Into your hands, Lord, 1 commend my life. My Jesus, I give
you my soul which you have redeemed with your blood. (Note that
the priest's voice should be strong and he should not stop making
these acts.) Lord Jesus Christ, receive my soul. My God, help me,
let me come to love you forever. My Jesus, my love, I love you, I
am sorry for my sins. 0 never let me offend You. Mary help me -
pray to Jesus for me Jesus, Jesus, Jesus, Jesus and Mary I give
you my heart and my soul.
The priest should be able to recognize the signs of death so
that he will be prepared to help the dying person. There are three
main ones which always occur:
1.) weak and unsteady pulse,
2.) labored breathing, and
3.) sunken and glassy eyes, or more opened than usual, or
too shining.
Some proximate signs of death are: the nose growing more
pointed and becoming white at its tip, the nostrils puffing up like
little bags, trembling hands, bluish fingernails, face turning yel-
low, blue, or different, the breath giving off a bad odor, a rigid
body, a cold or sweating forehead, too much heat in the area of the
heart, coldness in the hands and feet.
Still more proximate signs of death are: intermittent or
faulty breathing, lack of pulse, drawing together of and grating
of the teeth, gasping for breath, a certain soft gurgling or sigh-
ing, abundance of tears, a rigidity of the mouth, eyes, and of the
whole body.
r
Some p e o p l e may di e wit h o nl y a few o f t he s e s igns and wit h
a good p u l s e and e ve n whil e s p e aking - e s p e ci al l y, t ho s e s u f f e r i ng
from dr o p s y, f e ve r , o r wound, as t hma, p l e u r i s y, vo mit ing of bl o o d,
qu ins y, and r he u mat is m.
Pe o p l e ar e cl o s e t o de at h from p l e u r i s y when t he y have di f -
f i cu l t y in br e at hi ng, be gin f i ght i ng f o r br e at h, and t he i r l i p s be -
come bl u e . Those wounded in t he he ad o f t e n die s u dde nl y. Tho s e wit h
I
189
dr o p s y, when t h e i r p u l s e s t o p s and t he y have t o f i ght f o r b r e a t h
and foam at t he mo u t h. Tho s e who s u f f e r a f e ve r u s u al l y di e a t
t he be gi nni ng o f an a t t a c k , whi l e t he co nvu l s i o ns ar e v i o l e nt .
In some s i ckne s s t he p a t i e n t ' s br e at hi ng i s s o weak and
t h e i r h e a r t s o qu i e t t h a t t he y s e e m t o be de ad whe n t he y r e a l l y
ar e no t . The mo r e c e r t a i n s i gns o f de at h a r e : co l dne s s i n a l l
t he ar e as o f t he bo dy, e ve n ne ar t he h e a r t ; t he bo dy be co me s a
de ad we i ght ; t he n o s t r i l s f a i l t o r e s p o nd t o s ha r p , s t i mu l a t i ng
o do r s ; a mi r r o r he l d cl o s e t o t he mo u t h i s no t a l l t h a t cl o u de d,
and s i mi l a r t h i ng s .
Las t l y, s o me t ime s t he s i gns f a i l and t he p e r s o n di e s s u d-
de nl y wi t ho u t any o f t he m. The r e f o r e , as l o ng as t he p e r s o n i s
i n h i s ago ny, t he p r i e s t s ho u l d ne ve r l e ave him.
THE CHRISTIAN ACTS
One ve r y i mp o r t ant p r a c t i c e when a p e r s o n i s ne ar de at h -
o ne t o which ar e j o i ne d many i ndu l ge nce s - i s t o have him r e c i t e
t he C hr i s t i an act s o f Fa i t h , Ho p e , and C har i t y. (19)
Act o f Fa i t h. My Go d, i n f a l l i b l e t r u t h , be cau s e You have
r e ve al e d t o t he C hu r ch e ve r yt hi ng I am s u p p o s e d t o b e l i e v e , I b e -
l i e ve e ve r yt hi ng t h a t t he C hu r ch p r o p o s e s f o r me t o b e l i e v e . I
be l i e ve t h a t You ar e my Go d, t he C r e at o r o f a l l t h i ng s . I be l i e ve
t h a t yo u r e war d t he j u s t f o r a l l e t e r n i t y i n p a r a d i s e , and p u ni s h
s i nne r s i n h e l l . I b e l i e v e i n t he mys t e r y o f t he Mo s t Ho l y Tr i n i t y ,
t ha t i s , I be l i e ve t h a t yo u ar e t hr e e p e r s o ns , t he Fat he r , t he So n,
and t he Hol y Sp i r i t - b u t o nl y o ne God. I be l i e ve t h a t t he s e co nd
p e r s o n, t ha t i s , t he Son o f God, be came man i n t he womb o f Mary who
was al ways a Vi r gi n, and di e d f o r u s s i nne r s . The n He r o s e f r o m
t he de ad and now s i t s a t t he r i g h t hand o f t he Fa t he r . And f r o m
t he r e he s h a l l come t o j u dge t he l i v i ng and t he de ad. I b e l i e v e i n
t he s e ve n s acr ame nt s and e s p e c i a l l y i n B ap t i s m, Pe nance , Eu c h a r i s t ,
and Ext r e me Unct i o n. I be l i e ve t h a t a l l men mu s t r i s e agai n wi t h
t h e i r bo di e s . I b e l i e v e , f i n a l l y , a l l t h a t t he Ho l y Roman C at ho l i c
C hu r ch be l i e ve s - i n i t al o ne i s t he t r u e f a i t h .
Act of Ho p e . My Go d, t r u s t i ng i n yo u r p r o mi s e s , and be cau s e
yo u ar e f a i t h f u l , p o we r f u l , and me r c i f u l , I ho p e t hr o u gh t he me r i t s
o f J e s u s C hr i s t , f o r t he p ar do n o f my s i n s , f i na l p e r s e ve r ance , and
t he gl o r y o f p a r a di s e .
f
I
190.
I
1
:.
I
m
!
Act of Love. My God, because You ar e inf init e l y good and
* * o l inf init e l o ve , I love You with al l my he ar t more than
W O r
! h a I r e p e nt with my whole he ar t of al l my s ins , and
ever yt hing e l s e , i p
o f f e n d e
d your inf init e goodness. I
I de t e s t them, because I have offended y
b e s e e c h
^ ^
firmly resolve with the help ^ ^
o f f e n d Y o u a g a i n
. ^ a
i^sr^^^-^^^^-
iife
-
d at my
de at h.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Rit u al , de vis it at io ne e t cur a infirmorum.
Ennar r at io in Ps . 101, Migne 37/1301.
Migne, 184/529.
St . B r igid, Re ve l at io ns I I , ch 23; St . Cat he r ine , Dialogue, ch
139.
About t hr e e s cr ip t u r e t e xt s have been omitted in t his chap t e r
t he new cr i t i cal e dit io n has them saying something dif f e r e nt
t han what St . Alphonsus used them f o r , e . g. , Eccl 9/1, Ezech
18/21,22.
I
1
--- Bi
191.
6. Conclave animae fidelium, p 2, ch 13, n 18.
7. Migne, PL, 32/870.
8. This section brought into line with present code;
taken from the Spanish (Moriones) edition.
9. St. Augustine, de conjugiis adulterinis, Migne, PL, 40/470;
two paragraphs omitted (with Spanish) as out-of-date.
10. St. Cyril, in Joan. Migne, PL, 73/586;
St. Gregory, Oratio 18, Migne PGL, 35/1018.
11. ST, III, q 84, a 1; I II, q 102, a 5.
12. p II, ch 6, n 9.
13. Sess 14, de Extreme Unctione, ch 2.
14. Supp. q 30, a 1.
15. Taken from t he Sp anis h - s l i ght l y adap t e d in ke e p ing wit h
p r e s e nt l e gi s l at i o n - c 947; Al p ho ns u s incl u de s "e t suam
p iis s imam mis e r ico r diam" in t he s ho r t form and Gaude no t e s
t hat t hi s was dr o p p e d in 1906.
16. de vi s i t at i o ne e t cu r a inf ir mo r u m, n 3.
17. Se s s 14, de e xt r e ma u nct i o ne , ch 3.
18. These no t e s on t he B l e s s ing were moved up from t he ve r y end
of t he bo o k. This chap t e r -e nding has be e n l i mi t e d t o t he
e s s e nt i al s - I have on my desk f o u r di f f e r e nt e di t i o ns of
t he ?KaxJJ> and e ach o f them e nds i t di f f e r e nt l y - some wit h
l o ng l i s t s of p r aye r s , some wit h t he new f o r mu l a f o r t he
B l e s s ing, one br i e f l y wit h no p r aye r s o r B l e s s ing f o r mu l a.
C o ns e qu e nt l y, I u s e d my e di t o r ' s p r i vi l e ge and dr o p p e d t he
p r aye r s .