Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Lecture13 14

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Lecture March, 27, 2012.

1. When we take a sample of n independent observations X1 , . . . , Xn from


P
a N (m, 2 ) population, the sample variance S 2 = n1 ni=1 (Xi X)2 can
be shown to verify:
nS 2
2n1 .
2

Using this fact (and remembering that a 2n distribution has mean n


and variance 2n),
(a) Obtain an unbiased estimator
2 of 2 .
(b) Compute its variance.
(c) Compute the Cramer-Rao lower bound for the variance of unbiased
estimators of 2 .
(d) Is
2 efficient?
2. Write the expression of the Cramer-Rao lower bound for the variance
of unbiased estimators of a parameter based on n observations, under
regularity conditions. Then answer the following questions:
(a) If an unbiased estimator attains the Cramer-Rao lower bound, can
we assert that its variance decreases to zero as n ? At which
rate?
(b) Is such an estimator consistent?
3. Let X be distributed in (0, ) with density fX (x) = 3x2 /3 . Consider
the estimator = 43 X. Is it unbiased? What is its variance? Can we
use the Cramer-Rao lower bound to check its efficiency?
4. According to a well known model (the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium),
the offspring of a generation in which two characters have frequencies p
and q = 1 p are distributed in three classes, with probabilities p2 , 2pq
and q 2 . If we have a sample in which those three classes have absolute
frequencies 158, 475 and 362, write the equation giving the MLE of p.
5. X is distributed as binary, with parameter p. We know that

1
3

(a) What is the MLE of p based on one single observation?


(b) Is it unbiased?
(c) What is its mean squared error if the true p is 0.5?
1

p 23 .

(d) Is the MLE optimal? (Hint: Consider the rather silly estimator p = 0.5, irrespective of what is the value of the single
observation. This simple example is meant to show that the MLE
need not be very good if the sample is small.)
6. A plausible estimator of m in a N (m, 2 ) distribution would be the
sample median, since we know in that distribution the mean m and the
median take the same value. It can be shown that, asymptotically, the
sample median M e verifies:

n(M e m) N (0, 2 = (0.5/fX (m))2


What is the efficiency of M e?
You may find similar and additional problems in many books, such as [?],
[?], [?], [?] and [?] (the last, at a higher level than this course).

You might also like