Assignment 1
Assignment 1
Assignment 1
Name
Student ID:
Assignment #1
Please note:
Please put a copy of your Assignment including all workings, in Professor Wallers assignment
drop box located in the Civil Engineering Building on level 1, opposite of room 114 (Tea Room).
His box is labelled with his name Waller.
Let
Part A) Assume that and are continuous variables (not restricted to integer values). Write out the
mathematical formulation of the model that represents the problem formed by the shaded solution
space and the objective function
.
Part B) Solve this problem using AMPL. What is the optimal solution and the value of the objective
function?
Part C) Now assume that and are integer variables. Solve this problem using AMPL. What is the
optimal solution and the value of the objective function? How does the solution change from your
answer in part B and why?
The monthly transportation cost ($100/km) between a waste processing site and a suburb centre can
be determined by finding the shortest path between these points using the lines of the grid (i.e.
Manhattan or Taxi Cab distance). For example, the shortest distance between site 5 and suburb 5 is 30
km. The monthly rent for a waste processing site is proportional to its total distance to each suburb
centre, and land price is more expensive closer to a suburb. The monthly rents for each site are given
in following table:
Site 2
Site 3
Site 4
Site 5
$1000
$1200
$1800
$1300
$1400
Part A) Prepare the data file for the corresponding Uncapacitated Facility Location Problem (UFLP),
and submit a screen shot of the obtained .dat file.
Part B) To find the best waste management strategy, solve the problem in AMPL. You can use the
model introduced in the workshop on the UFLP. Which site(s) should be opened and which suburb(s)
are assigned to each open site? What is the value of the objective function?
For the remaining of Problem 2: Now assume that each waste processing site has a limited monthly
capacity given in the table below:
Capacity for each waste processing site (in tons)
Site 1
Site 2
Site 3
Site 4
Site 5
80
60
40
50
70
And assume that the waste demand, i.e. the monthly amount of waste produced, is estimated to 50
tons for each suburb.
Part C) Assume that a waste processing site may supply more than one suburb. Prepare the data file
and solve the corresponding Capacitated Facility Location Problem (CFLP) in AMPL. How does the
solution change relative to the UFLP solution in Part B?
Part D) Waste production is forecasted to increase by 10% for each suburb in the near future. The
council of Ummagumma plans to increase the capacity of one of its waste management site in order to
absorb this upcoming excess of waste. Three projects are under consideration:
a) Project 1: Add a capacity of 30 tons to Site 1
b) Project 2: Add a capacity of 20 tons to Site 2 and 10 tons for Site 4
c) Project 3: Add a capacity of 6 tons to each waste processing site
If the three projects have the same cost, which project is the least costly for Ummagumma? Report the
optimal solution and objective value for each project, and explain and justify your answer.
Part E) Instead of all projects being of equal costs, Project 1 cost $500, Project 2 cost $1000 and
Project 3 cost $800. Given these new project costs, would your project selection change (from your
answer in Part D)? Why or why not?
City 1
8
9
14
City 2
6
12
9
City 3
10
13
16
City 4
9
7
5
Part A) Write a mathematical formulation for this problem. Clearly identify the objective function,
constraints, and decision variables.
Part B) Solve the problem using AMPL. Include a screen shot of your data file, model file, and
solution.
Part C) The Power company seeks to reduce operations costs, and is currently debating between three
alternative options to do so:
a) Project 1: The power company can rebuild Plant 1, and in doing so double its capacity. The
annual cost of Project 1 is $75 million.
b) Project 2: The power company can invest in a new technology that will improve transmission
efficiency, and decrease the cost of transmission by 5% for all power station-city pairs. The
annual cost of Project 2 is $40 million.
c) Project 3: The power company can invest in a State-wide sustainability incentive program
which will reduce total power demand in each city by 5%. The annual cost of Project 3 is $25
million.
The company can choose only one project. Which project is best? Report the optimal solution and
objective value for each project, and explain and justify you answer.