Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessmentplanessay
Assessmentplanessay
Active responding strategies will be used as a formative assessment technique. PowerPoint will be
utilized during review time to assess the knowledge of student's before assessments and quizzes. The
students will be using dry-erase markers to write the correct answer on their desks, using Qwizdom
technology to participate in review and holding up cards to show their individual responses.
Assessment after instruction will be utilized daily. The students will be given an exit card daily
to complete after instruction. The data gained through exit cards will be used to pull tier 2 remediation
groups and provide one-on-one remediation. The most important assessment after instruction involves
a cumulative post-assessment. This post-assessment will include questions based on all three learning
goals. The post-assessment will be taken on the iPad using assessment creation software that mirrors
the questions students will see on the state assessments.
Appropriateness of Assessments
The pre-assessment and post-assessment all authentically and appropriately measure student
learning. These assessments are directly tied to the learning goals and the state standards. One of the
most helpful features of the OnTrac system that was used to create these assessments is that the
questions are approved by the state board of education and are drawn directly from the standards. Some
of the questions on the assessments have even been used on previous state assessments. Students have
had multiple exposures to content area covered on the assessment. Students have had the opportunity to
have hands-on experiences with measurement and have completed worksheets and quizzes with
questions similar to what is being assessed.
Assessment Adaptations
One adaptation that I made on the pre-assessment and post-assessment was allowing more time
for testing. Four of the students in this class regularly take significantly longer to complete
assessments. In order to accommodate these students, they were given extra time on the assessment.
This allowed the student to feel comfortable instead of feeling rushed and allowed the students time to
process the information in the question before answering.
Another adaptation that was made daily was grouping students heterogeneously and grouping a
lower level student with a higher level student. This adaptation was made during my formative
assessments during instruction during questioning and cooperative learning activities. There are four
groups of desks arranged in an L shape. In each group, the students are arranged so that there is a
high level student, a low level student and several students who are on grade level. If a student did not
know the answer to a question, I would provide them the opportunity to discuss it with their team or
with their shoulder partner. This gave the student the opportunity to discuss with their team and figure
out the answer and be able to answer in front of their classmates. Cooperative learning was utilized
many times throughout the unit and heterogeneous grouping was the key to making these experiences
a success. Students would always work in teams and I always ensured that there was at least one high
level student at each table who was seated nearby the lower level student. This helped me ensure that
the students who were unsure of how to complete the activity would receive the assistance they needed
from another student.
Assessment Alignment
The learning goals, learning objectives and assessments were completely standard based. The
learning goals were taken from the state standards on the measurement unit. I deconstructed some
standards to create specific learning goals that were clear and concise. The assessments are also
standards based. The questions on the assessment were created by the state board of education and
align directly with the standards that were taught during measurement. The main areas that were
assessed on the pre-assessment and post-assessment were used to create my learning goals. The
learning goals that were used for this unit are simply the learning goals further broken down into
measurable objectives. The state standards served as the guide while creating my unit, which ensured
cards are a short slip of paper that usually consist of 2-4 questions that reflect the content that was
learned that day. These exit cards are to be completed independently and are not graded during class
time. This gives the teacher an opportunity to see if students understood what was taught enough to
complete similar problems independently. Students that do not answer the exit card correctly are pulled
for one-on-one remediation. This is a very effective form of formative assessment because it gives the
opportunity for individual remediation.
Another formative assessment that will be used in my unit is Qwizdom. Qwizdom is an
interactive device that allows students to respond actively and individually (Qwizdom, n.d.). The
Qwizdom technology is linked up to Power Point. In the Power Point, the students are shown a
question and/or an image and are asked a multiple choice question. The students are then given a
Qwizdom device and sync up to the Power Point. Whenever the activity starts, the students must
choose the correct answer on their Qwizdom device and it is sent electronically to the teacher's
computer. The results are shown in bar graph style directly on the Power Point whenever the teacher
makes it available for the students to view. Qwizdom is a very effective tool for keeping students
actively engaged while assessing their knowledge of the material. The data from the Qwizdom will
allow me to gauge whether students understand the material and are able to answer questions that will
be similar to the assessment they will take at the end of the unit.