The document summarizes a case brought before the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) regarding nationality decrees issued in Tunisia and Morocco. The decrees automatically granted French nationality to people born in those territories to parents who were born there. The British government protested and wanted the PCIJ to rule on the matter. However, the PCIJ issued an advisory opinion stating that nationality is a domestic matter outside its jurisdiction. As a result, the disputing governments agreed those in Tunisia born to British parents could renounce French citizenship, but future generations would not have that option.
The document summarizes a case brought before the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) regarding nationality decrees issued in Tunisia and Morocco. The decrees automatically granted French nationality to people born in those territories to parents who were born there. The British government protested and wanted the PCIJ to rule on the matter. However, the PCIJ issued an advisory opinion stating that nationality is a domestic matter outside its jurisdiction. As a result, the disputing governments agreed those in Tunisia born to British parents could renounce French citizenship, but future generations would not have that option.
The document summarizes a case brought before the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) regarding nationality decrees issued in Tunisia and Morocco. The decrees automatically granted French nationality to people born in those territories to parents who were born there. The British government protested and wanted the PCIJ to rule on the matter. However, the PCIJ issued an advisory opinion stating that nationality is a domestic matter outside its jurisdiction. As a result, the disputing governments agreed those in Tunisia born to British parents could renounce French citizenship, but future generations would not have that option.
The document summarizes a case brought before the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) regarding nationality decrees issued in Tunisia and Morocco. The decrees automatically granted French nationality to people born in those territories to parents who were born there. The British government protested and wanted the PCIJ to rule on the matter. However, the PCIJ issued an advisory opinion stating that nationality is a domestic matter outside its jurisdiction. As a result, the disputing governments agreed those in Tunisia born to British parents could renounce French citizenship, but future generations would not have that option.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
Nationality and Statelessness
NATIONALITY DECREES IN TUNIS AND MOROCCO
PCIJ, February 7, 1923 FACTS On November 8th, 1921, a Decree was promulgated by the Bey of Tunis, the first article of which enacts as follows: With the exception of citizens, subjects or nationals of the Protecting Power (other than our own subjects), every person born in the territory of our Kingdom of parents one of whom was also born there, is a Tunisian, subject to the provisions of conventions or treaties binding the Tunisian Government. On the same date, the President of the French Republic issued a Decree of which the first article was as follows: Every person born in the Regency of Tunis of parents of whom one, justiciable as a foreigner in the French Courts of the Protectorate, was also born there, is French. Similar legislation was introduced at the same time in Morocco (French Zone). The British Government protested the decree made by the French Government and suggested that the matter should be presented to the Permanent Court of International Justice. The French Government declined stating that nationality is not a matter that is cognizable by the court. The British Government still submitted the matter to the PCIJ. ISSUE Whether or not the PCIJ has jurisdiction over cases of nationality HELD The PCIJ promulgated an advisory opinion stating that nationality is a matter that is purely domestic and not within the jurisdiction of international courts. Matters involving nationality depend on the development of international relations regarding the subject matter. The PCIJ did not decide the case based on its merits and merely made an advisory opinion stating that the matter should be resolved solely by the disputing governments. The advisory opinion of the PCIJ led to the exchange of notes between the two governments wherein it was agreed that all those that were born in Tunisia to British Parents in the first generation shall be given the option to denounce French citizenship and every generation thereafter shall not be given the same option. The decree effecting Morocco was not delved into as the Decree was not questioned by the British Government.