Pone 0062827
Pone 0062827
Pone 0062827
Abstract
Objective: Asthma is a complex pulmonary inflammatory disease characterized by the hyper-responsiveness, remodeling
and inflammation of airways. Formaldehyde is a common indoor air pollutant that can cause asthma in people experiencing
long-term exposure. The irritant effect and adjuvant effect are the two possible pathways of formaldehyde promoted
asthma.
Methodology/Principal Findings: To explore the neural mechanisms and adjuvant effect of formaldehyde, 48 Balb/c mice
in six experimental groups were exposed to (a) vehicle control; (b) ovalbumin; (c) formaldehyde (3.0 mg/m3); (d)
ovalbumin+formaldehyde (3.0 mg/m3); (e) ovalbumin+formaldehyde (3.0 mg/m3)+HC-030031 (transient receptor potential
ankyrin 1 antagonist); (f) ovalbumin+formaldehyde (3.0 mg/m3)+ capsazepine (transient receptor potential vanilloid 1
antagonist). Experiments were conducted after 4 weeks of combined exposure and 1-week challenge with aerosolized
ovalbumin. Airway hyper-responsiveness, pulmonary tissue damage, eosinophil infiltration, and increased levels of
interleukin-4, interleukin-6, interleukin-1b, immunoglobulin E, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide in lung
tissues were found in the ovalbumin+formaldehyde (3.0 mg/m3) group compared with the values seen in ovalbumin -only
immunized mice. Except for interleukin-1b levels, other changes in the levels of biomarker could be inhibited by HC-030031
and capsazepine.
Conclusions/Significance: Formaldehyde might be a key risk factor for the rise in asthma cases. Transient receptor potential
ion channels and neuropeptides have important roles in formaldehyde promoted-asthma.
Citation: Wu Y, You H, Ma P, Li L, Yuan Y, et al. (2013) Role of Transient Receptor Potential Ion Channels and Evoked Levels of Neuropeptides in a FormaldehydeInduced Model of Asthma in Balb/c Mice. PLoS ONE 8(5): e62827. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062827
Editor: Pranela Rameshwar, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, United States of America
Received December 21, 2012; Accepted March 26, 2013; Published May 9, 2013
Copyright: 2013 Wu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted
use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51136002 and 51076079), the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of
Respiratory Disease of China (2007DA780154F0906), and the China Key Technologies R&D Program (No. 2012BAJ02B03). The funders had no role in study design,
data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
* E-mail: yangxu@mail.ccnu.edu.cn (XY); klai@163.com (KL)
Introduction
Over recent decades, asthma has become an increasingly
prevalent disease. It now represents a serious public-health
problem worldwide, with an estimated 300 million people of all
ages affected (especially children) [1]. Asthma is a common
chronic disease of the airways characterized by enhanced airway
hyper-responsiveness (AHR), reversible airway remodeling and
chronic airway inflammation, which can lead to recurrent episodes
of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness and cough [2]. Asthma
is considered to be primarily an atopic disease [3]. At the cellular
level, allergens are internalized by antigen-presenting cells. CD4
TH2 cells are then activated, resulting in the release of TH2associated cytokines. This action leads to the synthesis of
immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibody. This is followed by the
degranulation of mast cells and infiltration of the airway mucosa
with eosinophils, which induces tissue remodeling and AHR [4,5].
PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org
of airway smooth muscle tone and the transport of fluid across the
bronchial epithelium [11].The largest portion of mammalian
airway-innervating sensory nerve fibers originates from vagal
ganglia, and a smaller number of airway sensory nerves originate
from dorsal root ganglia. The cell bodies of vagal sensory fibers are
located in the jugular and nodose ganglia with projections
peripherally to the airways and centrally to the solitary tract
nucleus in the brain stem [12].Some airway-specific neurons
within the vagal sensory ganglia have relatively larger cell body
diameters give rise to faster conducting myelinated A-fibers, while
others with small diameter cell bodies that give rise to
unmyelinated C-fibers [13]. The bronchial C-fibers are present
within the airway mucosa, and the pulmonary C-fibers are located
in the lung parenchyma. C-fibers can be activated by inflammatory mediators or exogenous chemical irritants, and releases
various neuropeptides, in particular SP and CGRP [14]. The
terminals of nerve fibers and the receptors for these neuropeptides
are localized in the vessel walls, bronchial smooth muscles, the
epithelial area and around mucus glands, so local stimulation of
sensory neurons projecting to these targets and the subsequent
neuropeptide release can lead to the features of inflammation such
as hyperemia, edema, mucus hypersecretion and contraction of
bronchial smooth muscle [15].
Neuropeptides have been described having a neuronal origin,
but there is increasing evidence that these peptides may be
synthesized and released from immune cells such as macrophages,
lymphocytes and monocytes [1619].Inflammatory cytokines may
increase the expression of neuropeptide genes in inflammatory
cells, so that inflammatory cell become a major source of the
neuropeptide at the inflammatory site [20].
Transient receptor potential (TRP) channels are a group of ion
channels located mostly on the plasma membrane of sensory nerve
cells and other cell types. They are distributed widely within the
respiratory tract. Here they act as a mechanistic link between
exposure to noxious irritants and inflammation to heightened
sensitivity to airway reflexes, pathological remodeling and airflow
limitation, as well as being associated with allergic asthma and
irritant-induced asthma [21]. TRP channels can be opened by a
wide range of exogenous chemical-irritant stimuli to elicit acute
pain and neurogenic inflammation through the peripheral release
of neuropeptides [22,23]. The two important pro-inflammatory
TRP ion channels are TRPV1 (capsaicin receptor) and TRPA1
(activated by mustard oil and garlic) [2426] because almost all
major neuronal inflammatory pathways converge on TRPV1 and
TRPA1 to increase the excitability of C-fibers during airway
inflammation [27], and they are also present on non-neuronal cells
[21,28].
Ascertaining the risk factors for the increase in the prevalence of
asthma is important. Formaldehyde (FA) is used in many products,
including resins, plywood, tobacco, particle board and tissue
fixatives [29,30]. Because of its wide use and varied sources,
individuals are exposed to gaseous FA in occupational and
domestic environments. Acute and chronic exposure to FA has
been associated with various toxic effects, including irritation,
oxidative stress, nasopharyngeal cancer and respiratory disorders
[3133]. Several epidemiological studies have demonstrated that
FA exposure can induce or exacerbate asthma [3437]. Unlike
typical allergens, FA-specific IgE is rarely detected [38,39], which
suggests that FA may be involved in asthma via a non-IgEmediated mechanism. Two possible pathways for FA-induced
asthma have been proposed: the irritant effect and the adjuvant
effect [40]. Some animal studies have shown that FA alone can up
regulate the levels of IgE and interleukin (IL)-4 and increase the
eosinophil count [4143], suggesting that FA alone may cause
PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org
Animals
Male Balb/c mice (56 weeks; 2261.5 g) were purchased from
the Hubei Province Experimental Animal Center (Wuhan, China)
and housed in standard environmental conditions (12-h lightdark
cycle, 5070% humidity and 2025uC). Food and water were
provided ad libitum. Mice were quarantined for $7 days before
study initiation. Eight mice in each group were used so as to
minimize the number of experimental animals needed while
ensuring the validity of statistical power.
Preparation of Gaseous FA
Gaseous FA was prepared from 10% formalin. The solution was
administered to mice through a vapor generator and automated
mouthnose only inhalation exposure chamber HOPE-MED
8052 (Hope-Med, Tianjin, China) capable of emitting gaseous
2
Experimental Protocol
Mice were divided randomly into six experimental groups of 8
animals. They were exposed to or not exposed to gaseous FA for 4
weeks (days 1 to 28) at 6 h/day and 5 days/week in the inhalation
exposure chamber. They were sensitized with OVA+Al(OH)3
(80 mg OVA and 1.3 mg gelatinous Al (OH)3 in 200 mL saline
each time or saline (200 mL) saline each time) by subcutaneous
injection on days 10, 18 and 25 followed by aerosol challenge in
1% OVA (30 min/day) or saline from days 29 to 35 using an
Ultrasonic Nebulizer (402AI, Yuyue, Beijing, China). For therapeutic intervention with a TRP channel antagonist, mice were preadministered (i.p.) with 150 mL of 8 mg/kg HC-030031 (suspended in 0.5% methylcellulose) or 1.6 mg/kg CPZ (TRPV1 dissolved
in 2.5% EtOH) or vehicle 30 min before FA exposure starting
each day from days 1 to 28.
Dedicated groups of mice (for each of the regimens described
above) were employed to prevent inaccuracies upon measurements
of lung cytokines/pulmonary architecture due to the influence of
the MCH used in AHR assessments. One set of 48 mice was
treated for 35 days according to the regimen(s) stated above and
then used for AHR tests and collection of bronchoalveolar lavage
fluid (BALF) samples. A second set of 48 mice was treated as
described above and then used directly for ELISA, histopathologic
and immunohistochemical analyses. The detailed protocol of this
study is shown in Fig. 1.
Measurement of AHR
AHR as an indicator of lung function was tested 24 h after the
final exposure to aerosol using an AniRes 2005 Lung Function
system (Bestlab 2.0, Beijing, China) according to manufacturer
instructions. Anesthesia was induced by intraperitoneal injection of
95 mg/kg pentobarbital sodium. A connection was made by a
computer-controlled ventilator via a cannula that had been
implanted surgically in the trachea. The respiratory rate and the
time ratio of expiration/inspiration were pre-set at 90/min and
1.5:1, respectively. An injector needle was inserted into the jugular
vein through which 0.025, 0.05, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg body weight
MCH was injected successively at 5-min intervals. After each
injection, airway resistance and lung compliance (Cdyn) in
response to increasing concentrations of MCH were recorded by
the system. Airway resistance is defined as the pressure driving
respiration divided by flow. Lung compliance refers to the
distensibility of the lung and is defined as the alteration in volume
of the lung produced by a change in pressure across the lung [51].
Airway responsiveness was assessed by indexes of expiratory
resistance (Re), inspiratory resistance (Ri), and the peak value of
Cdyn. The relative area (R-area, RL) was defined as the area
under the peak curve of Re or Ri and beyond the baseline level.
Immunohistochemical Assay
Sections of lung tissues were quenched of endogenous peroxides
with 3% H2O2. They were boiled in sodium citrate (0.01 mol/L,
pH 6.0) for antigen retrieval to unmask antigen epitopes,
permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 10 min, and blocked
with 5% BSA in PBSfor 30 min at room temperature. Sections
were incubated with diluted primary antibodies (rabbit anti-SP
antibody or rabbit anti-CGRP antibody, 1:200 dilution) overnight
at 4uC. Slides were washed with PBS, incubated with secondary
antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG; 1:200 dilutions) for 30 min at 37uC
and detected with a rabbit IgG peroxidase conjugated streptavi-
Figure 1. Study protocol. (A) Exposure, immunization and antagonist schedule. Groups: (a) vehicle control, (b) OVA, (c) FA, (d) FA+OVA, (e)
FA+OVA+HC-030031 and (f) FA+OVA+CPZ; (B) experimental design.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062827.g001
Statistical Analyses
All data are the mean 6 standard error of the mean (except the
data for substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide measured
by EILSA which are the mean 6 standard deviation of the mean).
Statistical graphs were generated using Origin 8.0 Software
(OriginLab, Berkeley, CA, USA). One-way ANOVA combined
with Fishers protected t-test was used to determine the significance
of differences between groups. p,0.05 was considered significant.
Data analyses were carried out using SPSS ver13 (SPSS, Chicago,
IL, USA).
Results
Effect of TRP Channel Antagonists on AHR
Figure 2 shows the results of measurements of airway
responsiveness. The R-area of the respiratory resistance (RL,
including Re and Ri) and peak values of Cdyn have been adopted
as sensitive indices. Three parameters of lung function (Ri, Re and
Cdyn) were recorded after each injection of MCH (0.025, 0.05, 0.1
and 0.2 mg/kg). In all groups, the expiratory and inspiratory
resistance increased with increasing MCH levels (p,0.01),
whereas Cdyn decreased (p,0.01). OVA-sensitized groups exhibited a greater airway response to MCH compared with the vehicle
control group (p,0.01) and FA exposure significantly enhanced
the degree of airway reactivity in OVA-sensitized mice (p,0.01).
Treatment with the TRPA1 antagonist HC-030031 and TRPV1
antagonist CPZ dramatically reduced Ri, Re and restored Cdyn in
FA+OVA-treated mice in response to MCH, respectively
(p,0.01).
Figure 2. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) measurements. With different doses of MCH: (A) R-area of Re. (B) R-area of Ri; (C) the peak value
of Cdyn. Animal groups (in all panels): n = 3 mice per group.*: p,0.05, **: p,0.01, compared with vehicle control; #: p,0.05, ##: p,0.01, compared
with OVA-immunized group; +: p,0.05, ++: p,0.01, compared with FA+OVA group.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062827.g002
Figure 3. Leukocyte infiltration in the airways in different experimental groups. (A) eosinophil counts in BALF. (B) Total cell counts in BALF.
(C) Lymphocyte counts in BALF. (D) Neutrophil counts in BALF. Animal groups(in all panels): veh:n = 7,OVA:n = 6,FA:n = 7,FA+OVA:n = 6,FA+OVA+HC030031:n = 6,FA+OVA+CPZ:n = 6.*: p,0.05, **: p,0.01, compared with vehicle control; ##: p,0.01, compared with OVA-immunized group. ++:
p,0.01, compared with FA+OVA group.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062827.g003
Figure 4 Serum IgE level. (A) Total IgE.Animal groups: veh: n = 8,OVA:n = 7,FA:n = 7,FA+OVA:n = 7,FA+OVA+HC- 030031:n = 7,FA+OVA+CPZ:n = 7.(B)
OVA-IgE.Animal groups: veh: n = 7,OVA:n = 8,FA:n = 7,FA+OVA:n = 7,FA +OVA+HC-030031:n = 7,FA+OVA+CPZ:n = 7.(C) OVA-IgG1.Animal groups:
veh:n = 8,OVA:n = 7,FA:n = 7,FA+. OVA:n = 7.FA+OVA+HC-030031:n = 7,FA+OVA+CPZ:n = 7.**: p,0.01, compared with vehicle control; ##: p,0.01,
compared with OVA-immunized group. ++: p,0.01, compared with FA+OVA group.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062827.g004
Discussion
Here we reported that the TRPA1 channel antagonist HC030031 and TRPV1 channel antagonist CPZ reduced FA
PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org
Figure 5. Cytokine levels in lung tissue. (A) IL-4 levels. Animal groups: veh: n = 6,OVA:n = 7,FA:n = 8, FA+OVA:n = 7, FA+OVA+HC030031:n = 6,FA+OVA+CPZ:n = 6. (B) IFN-c levels. Animal groups: veh: n = 8,OVA:n = 8,FA:n = 8; FA+OVA:n = 7, FA+OVA+HC-030031:n = 6,FA+OVA+CPZ:n = 6. (C) IL-1b levels. Animal groups:veh: n = 7,OVA: n = 7;FA:n = 8;FA+OVA:n = 8,FA+OVA+HC-030031:n = 6,FA+OVA+CPZ:n = 6. **: p,0.01,
compared with vehicle control; ##: p,0.01, compared with OVA-immunized group. ++: p,0.01, compared with FA+OVA group.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062827.g005
secretion of mucus, subepithelial fibrosis, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and deposition of the extracellular matrix in the
subepithelial layer. In the present study, we used three types of
staining methods to reveal changes in pulmonary histology. H&E
staining is a classical and typical staining research method for
airway remodeling. It can be used to examine the magnitude of
airway inflammation, but staining of collagen and goblet cells of
the lung sections cannot be done based on H&E staining. Hence,
we used PAS methods to examine mucus secretion and goblet
cells, and using MT methods to examine peribronchial collagen
deposition to describe airway remodeling.
The FA exposure group showed increased AHR compared with
the control group and caused slight, but statistically significant,
histological changes in the airways of mice. However, these
changes were not obviously different compared with those seen in
the OVA group. However, upon co-exposure with OVA, AHR
and airway remodeling was exacerbated.
The main pathological feature of asthma is allergic airway
inflammation, and an imbalance of Th1/Th2 immune responses is
a pathological basis of asthma and other atopic diseases [55]. IFNc represents the Th1 immune response and is associated with
8
Figure 6. Neuropeptide levels in lung tissue. (A) Substance P. Animal groups: veh: n = 6,OVA:n = 6, FA+OVA:n = 6, FA+OVA:n = 6, FA+OVA+HC030031:n = 6,FA+OVA+CPZ:n = 6. (B) CGRP. Animal groups: veh: n = 7,OVA:n = 8, FA+OVA:n = 7, FA+OVA:n = 8, FA+OVA+HC-030031:n = 7,FA+OVA+CPZ:n = 7.*: p,0.05, **: p,0.01, compared with vehicle control; ##: p,0.01, compared with OVA-immunized group. ++: p,0.01, compared with
FA+OVA group.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062827.g006
Figure 7. Immunohistochemical analyses. Representative images of the expression of (A) Substance P and (B) CGRP as determined by
immunohistochemical staining (brown color stain) (red arrow). Panel: (a) negative control group, (b) OVA group, (c) FA group, (d) FA+OVA group, (e)
FA+OVA+HC-030031 group, and (f) FA+OVA+CPZ group; Magnification =620. Analyses of (C) Substance P and (D) CGRP expression levels according
to average optical density. Animal groups (in all panels): n = 4 mice per group.*: p,0.05, **: p,0.01, compared with vehicle control; #: p,0.05, ##:
p,0.01, compared with OVA-immunized group. +: p,0.05, ++: p,0.01, compared with FA+OVA group.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062827.g007
Figure 8. Representative histological images of airway remodeling of lung tissue. (A) H&E staining: showing infiltration of inflammatory
cells (red arrow) and hypertrophy of structural cells (blue arrow). N: normal conditions; S: slight changes; M: moderate changes; V: severe changes. (B)
Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining: showing mucous cells (pale pink color stain) (red arrow). (C) Massons trichrome (MT) staining showing
subepithelial collagen deposition (blue color stain) (red arrow). Panel: (a) vehicle control group, (b) OVA group, (c) FA group, (d) FA+OVA group, (e)
FA+OVA+HC-030031 group and (f) FA+OVA+CPZ group. Magnification =620.Animal groups (in all panels): n = 4 mice per group.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062827.g008
10
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Professors Yinping Zhang and Jan Sundell of Tsinghua
University, China, for their excellent suggestions and comments on this
work. We gratefully acknowledge Liwen Bianji for editing the article.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: X. Yang KL YW. Performed the
experiments: YW H. You PM LL YY JL X. Ye XL RC. Analyzed the data:
X. Yang YW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: X. Yang H.
Yao. Wrote the paper: YW X. Yang.
References
1. Bateman ED, Hurd SS, Barnes PJ, Bousquet J, Drazen JM, et al. (2008) Global
strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary.
Eur Respir J 31: 143178.
2. Hamid Q, Tulic M (2009) Immunobiology of asthma. Annu Rev Physi 71: 489
507.
3. Yates AB, Richard D (2005) Atopy and Asthma. Encyclopedia of life science.
Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons. 19.
4. Locksley RM (2010) Asthma and allergic inflammation. Cell 140: 777783.
5. Han B, Guo J, Abrahaley T, Qin L, Wang L, et al. (2011) Adverse effect of
nano-silicon dioxide on lung function of rats with or without ovalbumin
immunization. PLoS ONE 6: e17236.
6. Dakhama A, Park JW, Taube C, El Gazzar M, Kodama T, et al. (2005)
Alteration of airway neuropeptide expression and development of airway
hyperresponsiveness following respiratory syncytial virus infection. Am J Physiol
Lung Cell Mol Physiol 288: L761L770.
7. Ramalho R, Almeida J, Beltrao M, Pirraco A, Costa R, et al. (2013) Substance P
antagonist improves both obesity and asthma in a mouse model. Allergy 68: 48
54.
8. Richardson JD, Vasko MR (2002) Cellular Mechanisms of Neurogenic
Inflammation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 302: 839845.
9. Geppetti P, Nassini R, Materazzi S, Benemei S (2008) The concept of
neurogenic inflammation. BJU Int 101 suppl: 26.
10. Grant J (2012) Tachykinins stimulate a subset of mouse taste cells. PLoS ONE 7:
e31697.
11. Belvisi MG (2002) Overview of the innervation of the lung. Curr Opin
Pharmacol 2: 211215.
12. Undem BJ, Michael JC (2002) The Role of Nerves in Asthma. Curr Allergy
Asthm R 2: 159165.
13. Barnes PJ (2001) Neurogenic Inflammation in the Airways. Resp Physiol 125:
145154.
14. Lee LY, Pisarri TE (2001) Afferent properties and reflex functions of
bronchopulmonary C-fibers. Respir Physiol 125: 4765.
15. Giovanna P, Dario O, Alfredo C (2009) The Airway Neurogenic Inflammation:
Clinical and Pharmacological Implications. Inflammation & Allergy Drug Ta 8:
176181.
16. Ho WZ, Lai JP, Zhu XH, Uvaydova M, Douglas SD (1997) Human monocytes
and macrophages express substance P and neurokinin-1 receptor.J Immunol
159: 56545660.
17. Germonpre PR, Bullock GR, Lambrecht BN, Van DVV, Luyten WH, et al.
(1999) Presence of substance P and neurokinin 1 receptors in human sputum
macrophages and U-937 cells. Eur Respir J 14: 776782.
18. Joos GF, Germonpre PR, Pauwels RA (2000) Role of Tachykinins in Asthma.
Allergy 55: 321337.
19. Singer K, Morris DL, Oatmen KE, Wang T, DelProposto J, et al. (2013)
Neuropeptide y is produced by adipose tissue macrophages and regulates
obesity-induced inflammation. PLoS ONE 8: e57929.
20. Capuron L, Miller AH (2011) Immune System to Brain Signaling: Neuropsychopharmacological Implications. Pharmacol Ther 130: 226238.
21. McAlexander MA, Thomas TC (2011) The Role of Transient Receptor
Potential Channels in Respiratory Symptoms and Pathophysiology. Adv Exp
Med Biol 704: 969986.
22. Nilius B, Owsianik G, Voets T, Peters J (2007) Transient receptor potential
cation channels in disease. Physiol Rev 87: 165217.
23. Nassini R, Pedretti P, Moretto N, Fusi C, Carnini C, et al. (2012) Transient
receptor potential ankyrin 1 channel localized to non-neuronal airway cells
promotes non-neurogenic inflammation. PLoS ONE 7: e42454.
11
46. Qiao Y, Li B, Yang G, Yao H, Yang J, et al (2009) Irritant and adjuvant effects
of gaseous formaldehyde on the ovalbumin-induced hyperresponsiveness and
inflammation in a rat model. Inhal Toxicol 21: 12001207.
47. McNamara CR, Mandel BJ, Bautista DM, Siemens J, Deranian KL, et al. (2007)
TRPA1 mediates formalin-induced pain. Proc Nati Acad Sci U S A. 104:
1352513530.
48. Tong Z, Luo W, Wang Y, Yang F, Han Y, et al (2010) Tumor tissue-derived
formaldehyde and acidic microenvironment synergistically induce bone cancer
pain. PLoS ONE 5: e10234.
49. Han Y, Li Y, Xiao X, Liu J, Meng XL, et al. (2012) Formaldehyde up-regulates
TRPV1 through MAPK and PI3K signaling pathways in a rat model of bone
cancer pain. Neurosci Bull 28: 165172.
50. Tang X, Yang B, Duong A, Smith MT, Li L, et al. (2009) Formaldehyde in
China: Production, Consumption, Exposure Levels, and Health Effects. Environ
Int 35: 12101224.
51. Drazen JM, Finn PW, De Sanctis GT (1999) Mouse models of airway
responsiveness: physiological basis of observed outcomes and analysis of selected
examples using these outcome indicators. Annu Rev Physiol 61: 593625.
52. Apgar JM, Juarranz A, Espada J, Villanueva A, Canete M, et al. (1998)
Fluorescence microscopy of rat embryo sections stained with haematoxylin
eosin and Massons trichrome method. J Microsc 191: 2027.
53. Bangle R, Alford WC (1954). The chemical basis of the periodic acid-Schiff
reaction of collagen fibers with reference to periodate consumption by collagen
and by insulin. J Histochem Cytochem 2: 6276.
54. Carlsten C, Melen E (2012) Air pollution, genetics, and allergy: an update. Curr
Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 12: 455461.
55. Busse WM, Lemanske RF (2001) Asthma. N Engl J Med 344: 350362.
56. Fahy JV (2009) Eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation in asthma: insights
from clinical studies. Proc Am Thorac Soc 6: 256259.
57. Sousa AR, Lane SJ, Nakhosteen JA, Lee TH, Poston RN (1996) Expression of
interleukin-1b (IL-1b) and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) on
asthmatic bronchial epithelium. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154: 10611066.
58. Nambu A, Susumu N (2010) IL-1 and Allergy. Allergol Int 59: 125135.
59. Larson SD, Plopper CG, Baker G, Tarkington BK, Decile KC, et al. (2004)
Proximal airway mucous cells of ovalbumin-sensitized and -challenged Brown
Norway rats accumulate the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 287: L286L295.
60. Vries A, Engels F, Henricks PA, Mcgregor GP, Braun A, et al (2006) Airway
hyper-responsiveness in allergic asthma in guinea-pigs is mediated by nerve
growth factor via the induction of substance P: a potential role for trkA. Clin Exp
Allergy 36: 11921200.
61. OConnor TM, OConnell J, OBrien DI, Goode T, Bredin CP, et al. (2004)
The Role of Substance P in Inflammatory Disease. J Cell Physiolo 201: 167180.
62. Tracey KJ (2009) Reflex Control of Immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 419428.
63. Mostafa GA (2009) Neurogenic inflammation and allergy. Egypt J Pediatr
Allergy Immunol 7: 4558.
64. Biro T, Maurer M, Modarres S, Lewin NE, Brodie C, et al. (1998)
Characterization of functional vanilloid receptors expressed by mast cell. Blood
91: 13321340.
65. Zhang D, Spielmann A, Wang L, Ding D, Huang F, et al. (2012) Mast-Cell
Degranulation Induced by Physical Stimuli Involves the Activation of TransientReceptor-Potential Channel TRPV2. Physiol Res 61: 113124.
66. Bautista DM, Pellegrino M, Tsunozaki M (2013) TRPA1: A Gatekeeper for
Inflammation. Annu Rev Physiol 75: 181201.
67. Caceres AI, Brackmann M, Elia MD, Bessac BF, Camino DD, et al.(2009) A
Sensory Neuronal Ion Channel Essential for Airway Inflammation and
Hyperreactivity in Asthma. Proc Nati Acad Sci U S A 106: 90999104.
12