Activity 40 Data Table

Activity 40 Parts Per Million
Name:
Cup
Color
Concentration
(Parts Per_____)
1 part per 10
Concentration
(%)
10%
1 part per 100
1%
Black Red
2
Regular mixed
with a hint of red
black
3
Orange Red
1 part per 1000
0.1%
Transparent Red
1 par per 10000
0.01%
Barely any red,

mostly liquid water
1 part per 100000
0.0001%
Water
1 part per
1000000
0.00001%
Water
1 part per
10000000
0.000001%
Water
1 part per
100000000
0.0000001%
Water
1 part
per1000000000
0.00000001%
Answer Analysis Questions C-55 to C-56 (1-8) below:
1. Cup one is less diluted than cup two, since cup one has been diluted
with water that completely made the solution have only ten percent
of the red dye, but with the addition of nine drops to the original ten
percent of the dye, cup ones parts would be divided by ten for the
addition of the nine drops that stand for ten out of one hundred; this
would make the ten drops of red dye divide into one like on the
graph above, as the parts have to become bigger to fit the number
of the ninety parts of water that are being dropped in, which would
make the drops of the original solution lower, which would cause the
original value of ten percent to count for one as this would provide
more room for the ninety percent to fit in, and plus, I know that cup
two is more diluted, since the red dye value is less than the red dye
value of cup one or the concentration of cup two is less than the
amount of concentration found in cup one, and because of that, cup
one has more red dye than cup two, which indeed also proves that
cup two is more diluted, since it also contains ninety nine percent of
water while cup one has only ninety percent.
2. The concentration for cup two is one part per one hundred, since
one tenth times 1/10 will equal one out of one hundred, which is the
answer in this instance, and in addition to that, it is proven by the
fact that the graph indeed also says that cup two has one out of one
hundred parts in its solution, and as a result, the concentration of
cup two is definitely one out of one hundred, since cup two took one
tenth out of the previous solution and added to itself, which is the
total of one out of hundred or in fraction form as written 1/100.
3. The answer is cup six or the cup where the solution finally becomes
clear and looks like the red dye has completely faded away, as we
keep on taking one tenths out of the previous solution, starting with
taking one tenth out of the solution with ten percent dye, which
would get one percent or one out of one hundred, and the process
would continue on from there until cup six when it becomes one part
per million, as shown on the graph, as in the lab we had to keep on
taking one tenth of the original solution to get the answer for this
solution, and because of that result, it went into a process of one
tenth multiplying the parts per million of the original cup, so when it
was one out of one hundred thousand, the lab required us to take
one tenth out again to get one part per million, as one tenth times
one out of one hundred thousand will equal one out of a million,
which is the answer of cup six, since it demonstrated the same
procedure like I said before where the concentration is being
multiplied by one tenth to get the next answer, and when going to
cup six, that is when it reached a point of one part per million.
4. Like I said before, cup six was the cup where the solution became
more clear than ever as you cannot see any red dye that once was
there in the solution of ten percent concentration in the cup where
the dye is considered one part out of a million, and this is because
the rest of the cups onwards become clear, while also this one
begins the new change of the cups color as it goes from a small
placement of red in cup five to nothing at all in cup six, and this is
because cup six has a concentration of one part per million, which is
a small amount, and since the dye is only one part out of 999,999
other parts, it cannot be visible as it would be covered up by the

water, as this part of the concentration is small and cannot be seen,
but it there as you took some of the liquid, which surely had visible
red into the other cup, meaning that it has to be there, since you got
that source of the solution from the other source proven to have the
red dye, and because of that, cup six is the first seen to not have
color at all.
5. Yes, I know that there is color in cup eight, since when we took color
from the cups before cup six, they had color in it that was visible,
and since the lab required us to take the mixed solution, meaning
the solution would be mixed perfectly with dye and water together,
there should be some in cup eight, as cup eights original source of
water came from cup seven, cup six, and onwards from the left side,
as the source has been shown to have dye from cup five, so if then
the lab required us to take some of cup five, which has the due, and
put it into cup six and continue on, then there should be dye in
there, since the dye was definitely transferred from cup five all the
way to cup eight as the dropper had to take some of the dye from
cup five and put it into cup six, which would take some of the dye
and put it into cup number seven then to cup eight, and because of
that while the process early in the stage shows that we had taken
some of the dye and transferred it into the other, where it was
obviously seen, then cup eight should have it, since its source came
from cup five, which surely had dye and would likely have been
taken to spread onwards as the process has shown early on, and the
reason why it is not visible is because it is hard to see at the parts
one hundred million I too much for the single part of dye to be seen
as the water will make the concentration smaller.
6. For an experiment to back up this one, I would use a slice of pie as
an correlation to the dye while using the whipped cream as the
water, as I would have one tenth of the pie like in the original as cup
one had ten percent of the solution, and then I would add a specific
amount of whip cream to fit the nine drops of water, so then I would
cut that one tenth of a pie by one tenth to act as cup two as you
take one tenth away from the concentration, and then, I would as
the same amount of whip cream; I would repeat the process until I
would reach the ninth portion of the pie, now a sliver, as they would
all be filled with the same amount of whip cream; this process would
work as it shows the exact same way the dyes worked as I took one
tenth of the concentration or red dye to add it to the second area,
where then I add the same amount of whip cream, like the project
when I had to add the same nine drops; this would help demonstrate
the rule the cup eight, despite it lacking any visible substance,
having the red dye, as this pie demonstrates how the concentration,
this case a pie, will be cut by one tenth to a smaller portion where
the one tenth part would be moved to the second area; then it would
be cut by one tenth and afterwards, the second and first area would
be covered in whip cream; the use of this experiment is to show that

the whip cream will be masking the substance, as when it reaches
the eight area, there will be no visible substance to see as it is
covered in whip cream, but you would know it was there as the
person cut it and saw the one tenth part of the original portion of
the concentration go into the next area, so they would know that the
concentration was there, since they cut it and put it there, but the
whip cream caused it to be covered, which is exactly how cup eight
worked as both experiments show that the dye is there, since it took
its source from one tenths of the other cup, which surely had dye as
it was visible, but in both those cups, the whip cream or water was
too much and covered it.
7. For a scientist, I suggest they use parts per million in subjects like
testing the water supply, as many things can be hidden in the water,
making is not visible like many things like the red dye in cup eight,
so using a term like this can report how much of the contaminant is
in the affected water, and this is important, since you can report
figures of numbers by using parts per million, as it helps suggest
safety regulations in the water, while supporting how to solve it; the
answer would be diluting it more, and in fact, the government uses
parts per millions to view how many parts of the contaminants re
affecting the water, as even a one out of one thousand can pose a
threat, and this helps give a better quantity as man cannot calculate
the total volume of the affected water system, but by taking a scoop
of water and testing it for parts per million, it helps give a sense of
how much the contaminant is there and how to fix it, while this way
is often better as like the water in the red dye, it shows a ratio of
how much water the single piece of contaminant is affecting, so this
can help the government take action, use precautions, and more,
which all came from this idea of telling parts per million when
coming to water safety.
8. No, I would not follow this advice, since many contaminants or
things like red food dye that are hidden and can be a lethal threat,
can hide at one part per a million or even higher to one part per
anything, and because of that, it gives off a sense a danger, as some
contaminants work even diluted out large amounts like one part per
ten million of so, so even when the contaminants are hidden, they
can cause an issue as they impose a threat still even if you drink it,
and the water covers up the smell and sight of the water, meaning
that it is hard to tell whether it is safe of not, since there is
concentrations of lower than one percent that can still pose a threat
like mercury, which can cover up itself in the water, but it can still do
the same damage, and because it takes lots of diluting like getting
something to one part per billion to stop it, it is not safe to drink
water that presumably looks clean and smells clean as it can still
pose a threat, and also, from previous information, the government
has tried to regulate these harmful contaminants to large parts per
something to avoid any serious issues, so because of that it can hide

at parts per million, a place where many contaminants can be hidden
but still cause a problem, I would rather suggest throwing the water
away or filtering it if anything.

Activity 40 Data Table

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Activity 40 Data Table

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Activity 40 Data Table

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Activity 40 Parts Per Million

1 part per 100

1 part per 1000

1 par per 10000

Barely any red,

1 part per 100000

Answer Analysis Questions C-55 to C-56 (1-8) below:

other parts, it cannot be visible as it would be covered up by the

be covered in whip cream; the use of this experiment is to show that

something to avoid any serious issues, so because of that it can hide

You might also like