Molecular Dynamics: An in Silico Analysis of JD and Its Mutant
Molecular Dynamics: An in Silico Analysis of JD and Its Mutant
Molecular Dynamics: An in Silico Analysis of JD and Its Mutant
RMSD
Jd Wild Type
Jd D35N
RMSD
Jd Wild Type
JdD35N
>The stability of the proteins were also tested using constant velocity pulling.
>The graph hints that more force is needed to pull JdD35N
>Average force value is consistent with this observation
(Jd: 543.841 piconewtons JdD35N: 799.40 piconewtons)
Conclusion
>in silico analysis suggests that Jd D35N is structurally
more rigid than Jd wild type
>This is in stark contrast to published studies, which found
that JdD35N is less rigid than the Jd wild type (Bascos, 2009). A
revision of the parameters in the molecular dynamics
simulation script is recommended.
Reference
Landry SJ, Bascos NA (2009) Protein flexural
dysfunction: Loss of structural rigidity in a Hsp40
J-domain mutant correlates with loss of Hsp70
activation. The FASEB Journal