Customer Satisfaction Survey at Café Coffee Day: Navin
Customer Satisfaction Survey at Café Coffee Day: Navin
Customer Satisfaction Survey at Café Coffee Day: Navin
Harshal
Saatvik
Rahul
Sandeep
Abhishek
A PROJECT ON BUSINESS
RESEARCH METHODS
Abhishek BV
Roll No. 55
Harshal Chichghare Roll No.73
Rahul Gollamudi Roll No.75
Navin Babu E S Roll No.81
S Saatvik
Roll No.96
Sandeep RajBhushan Roll No.97
Group 3 Section B
Agenda
INTRODUCTION
COMPANY BACKGROUND
LIVE BUSINESS PROBLEM
APPROACH
MANAGEMENT DECISION PROBLEM
RESEARCH PROBLEM
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
RESEARCH SUB-OBJECTIVES
HYPOTHESES
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
QUESTIONNAIRE
DATA ANALYSIS
INTERPRETATION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
COMPANY BACKGROUND
Business: Cafes
Revenues: Rs 510 crore (approx.)
Presence: 918 outlets in 139 cities (excluding four in Vienna and two in
Karachi)
Plans: 2,000 stores in India in four years; 100 abroad in three years
Business: Grab & Go kiosks selling coffee, beverages, quick eats. Spotted
at malls, corporate premises, airports, railway stations
Presence: 999 outlets Plans: 1,200 by end of fiscal 2011
COMPANY BACKGROUND
MANAGEMENT DECISION
PROBLEM
To determine an improved
marketing strategy for Coffee
Day based on customer
feedback.
RESEARCH PROBLEM
Measure customer satisfaction using
a survey based on marketing mix
components, on the Coffee line of
Coffee Day Xpress.
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Product/Service:
Analysis of customer perception of the variety and
quality of coffee beverages on offer at the outlets
Measurement of the satisfaction of customers with
attitude of the staff
Price:
Determining the willingness of the customers to pay
the prices as per the rate card
RESEARCH
Place/Distribution:
OBJECTIVES
Research Sub-objectives:
HYPOTHESES
HYPOTHESIS 1:
H0 (Null Hypothesis): The current level of satisfaction is below
average
H1 (alternate Hypothesis): The customers of Coffee Day Xpress are
satisfied with the current offerings in coffee.
HYPOTHESIS 2:
H0 (Null Hypothesis): Satisfaction is not affected by the marketing
mix components.
H1 (Alternate Hypothesis): Satisfaction is a function of the
marketing mix components.
HYPOTHESIS 3:
H0( (Null Hypothesis): The customer perceive the brands to be
inferior/similar to competing brands.
H1 (Alternate Hypothesis): The customers perceive the brand to be
better than competing brands.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Sources of data:
Primary Questionnaires
Secondary Websites and newspaper/magazine articles
Sampling Design
Sample Size: 103
Sampling type: Convenience/Judgment Sampling
Research Design
Descriptive Research: To determine the current customer
satisfaction level and the areas for improvement
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Questionnaire
Product/Service:
Analysis of customer perception of the variety and
quality of coffee beverages on offer at the outlets
From the survey results, we see that the average rating that the customers
have given to
Variety = 2.54/5.00
Quality = 2.75/5.00
Here, 3/5 signifies a neutral opinion.
Therefore, the results show quite a significant level of dissatisfaction
amongst customers.
Also, we try to determine the weightage that the customers have given
these two factors.
From the results, we see that the average weightage (out of 100) given to
these 2 factors are:
Variety = 16.24
Quality = 19.30
Both these values are above the neutral value of 14.29 which is obtained
by assigning equal weightage to all 7 factors under consideration.
Price:
Determining the willingness of the
customers to pay the prices as per the rate
card
Place/Distribution:
Verify the availability of products as and when demanded at
the outlets.
Analysis of customer perception of convenience of outlets
location
Promotion:
Quantification of customers attitude towards promotional
schemes and incentives
The survey shows that the customers have assigned only
a lowly 8.37% weightage to promotion as a deciding
factor.
However, the price factor for CCD was given a good rating
of 3.35/5.00
FACTOR ANALYSIS
Factor analysis
Factor Analysis
Factor Analysis
This shows that there are four
underlying factors affecting customer
satisfaction:
Factor 1: Variety, Quality, Flavor,
Attitude, Taste and Service or
PRODUCT/SERVICE
Factor 2: Convenience, Availability
or PLACE
Factor3: New Product, Promotion,
Advertising or PROMOTION
Factor 4: PRICE
Applying One tailed t-test on the sample with a test value of 3.18, we can
conclude that customer satisfaction is slightly below average level.
Hence there is significant scope for CCD to improve upon the same.
We will try to explain the same with a comparative analysis
COMPARATIVE STUDY
COMPARATIVE STUDY
MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION
MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION
MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION
MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION
Multivariate regression to determine the model for
Customer Satisfaction based on the various marketing mix
parameters gives the following results:
The model is explained significantly by factors 1,2, 3
which pertain to PRODUCT/SERVICE, PLACE AND PRICE.
Factor 4 is insignificant
There is medium degree of association between the
variables, as shown by the value of R and R^2
CONCLUSION
We see that Barista has scored significantly better than
CCD in terms of non-coffee beverages and ambience
This shows that CCD should concentrate on the non-coffee
beverages like hot and cold tea, fruit beverages and icecream based beverages where Barista is currently preferred
by customers.
Coffee Days average ratings of the variable are quite low,
which signifies a scope for improvement.
CCD scores low on factors of Variety, Quality, Attitude,
Promotions and Convenience, despite the apparent
superiority to Barista.
REFERENCES
Caf Coffee Day executives at Community Center, East of
Kailash: Mr.Asif Ansari, Marketing Manager, Caf Coffee Day
Caf Coffee Day website: www.cafecoffeeday.com
Marketing Research 6th edition, by Malhotra and Dash
Search Engines www.google.com and similar sites
THANK YOU