Behaviorist Learning Theory
Behaviorist Learning Theory
Behaviorist Learning Theory
BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
Principles of learning should apply equally to different behaviors and to different species of
animals, otherwise known as equipotentiality.
Learning can be studied most objectively when the focus of study is on stimuli and responses.
The most useful theories tend to be parsimonious ones (Ormrod, 2008, p. 33-35). This refers to
behaviorists belief that all behaviors should be explained by as few learning principles as
possible. This is very similar to Occams Razor otherwise known as thePrinciple of Parsimony or
Law of Simplicity, which posits that all things being equal, the simplest explanation is probably
more likely unless or until new evidence suggests a more complex theory (Carroll, 2010).
Discovered early classical conditioning while studying the digestive process, salivation and reflexes in the
autonomic nervous system of dogs.
Classical Conditioning
Figure 1. This illustration shows the steps of classical conditioning.
1. Food= salivation
2. Food + Stimulus = salivation (conditioned stimulus)
3. Bell alone produces salivation (conditioned response) (Standridge, 2002, p. 1).
.
John B. Watson (1878-1958)
Through observations of Pavlovs experiments, Watson believed that human behavior resulted from
specific stimuli that elicited certain responses (Standridge, 2002, p. 1).
.
The Stimulus-Response Model.
Three key assumptions:
1. Observable behavior, rather than internal thought processes are the focus of study. In particular,
learning is manifested by a change in behaviour.
2. The environment shapes ones behaviour; what one learns is determined by the elements in the
environment, not by the individual learner.
3. The principles of contiguity (how close in time two events must be for a bond to be formed) and
reinforcement (any means of increasing the likelihood that an event will be repeated) are central
to explaining the learning process (Smith, 1999, p. 1).
.
Operant Conditioning
Figure 2. This illustration illustrates operant conditioning. The mouse pushes the lever and receives a
food reward. Therefore, he will push the lever repeatedly in order to get the treat.
Skinners model was based on the premise that satisfying responses are conditioned, while unsatisfying
ones are not. Operant conditioning is the rewarding of part of a desired behavior or a random act that
approaches it (Standridge, 2002, p. 1).
.
3. Reinforcement is the cardinal motivator. Positive reinforcers like rewards and successes are preferable
to negative events like punishments and failures.
4. Learning is helped when objectives are clear (Smith, 1999, p. 1)
.
How Does Learning Occur?
Objectivistic meaning the world is real, external to the learner (Ertmer & Newby, 1993, p. 62).
Knowledge exists externally and is acquired by the passive learner.
Learning is the direct result of external stimuli producing a specific response (Ertmer & Newby, 1993;
Standridge, 2002).
Black box-observable behavior main focus (Davis, Edmunds & Kelly-Bateman, 2008, p.1)
.
Spontaneous Recovery the recurrence of a previously conditioned behavior after the behavior has been
extinguished. (Ormrod, 2008).
.
Other factors include generalization, stimulus discrimination, higher-order conditioning and sensory
preconditioning (Ormrod, 2008).
.
.
Extrinsic reinforcers may be material, social or activity
Intrinsic reinforcers are internal positive feelings within the learner as a result of the behavior
(2) Negative reinforcement for example, passing all quizzes with an A means not taking the
chapter test.
.
Punishment is the presentation of a stimulus that decreases the probability or frequency of a
response/behavior (Standridge, 2002, p. 1). For example, Zero Tolerance policies. If a student fights in
school they are automatically suspended.
(1) May take many forms: verbal reprimands, restitution and overcorrection, positive practice
overcorrection, time-out, in-house suspension, response cost (withdrawal of previously earned reinforce)
(Ormrod, 2008, p. 62-63).
.
Extinction is the removal of a previously reinforced stimulus to decreases the frequency or probability of
a response/behavior (Standridge, 2002, p. 1).
(1) For example, a toddler throws a tantrum in the grocery store. The mother usually gives the child a
lollipop to stop. Child is reinforced to continue tantrums in the grocery store. Mother stops giving the
child a lollipop. The child stops having tantrums.
.
When stimuli and responses are similar in the two situations, maximal positive transfer will occur.
(2)
When stimuli are different and responses are similar, some positive transfer will occur.
(3) When stimuli are similar and responses are different, negative transfer will occur (Ormrod, 2008,
p. 396).
Examples:
(1) My cats, Kendall and Pandora have learned that the can opener sound means they are going to
eat. They have transferred this information to mean anytime the can opener is used it means they are
going to eat.
(2) In relation to an earlier example of the child who has a tantrum in the grocery store and receives a
lollipop. The child begins to generalize that by having tantrums in public places the mother will give the
child a lollipop.
Stimulus, response (Davis, et al., 2008, p. 1).
.
What Types of Learning are Best Explained by this Model?
Task-based learning (Davis, et al., 2008, p. 1).
Mastery learning involving fact recollections (math facts or sight words), generalizations, associations, or
chaining skills (Ertmer & Newby, 1993; Ormrod, 2008).
According to Ormrod, there are subsets of learners who most benefit from the rigid structural paradigm of
behaviorism such as: learners who have previously experienced failure in an academic setting; learners
with special need due to developmental delays, learning disabilities, socioemotional issues and/or
behavioral issues, as well as for learners for whom nothing else has worked for them (Ormrod, 2008).
It is also paramount to realize the possibilities of creating a Behavioristic learning condition, unwittingly,
in the classroom. Care should be taken not to reinforce inappropriate behaviors by accident.
.
References
Carroll, R. (2010). Occams razor. Retrieved December 16, 2010, fromhttp://skepdic.com/occam.html
Davis, C., Edmunds, E., & Kelly-Bateman, V. (2008). Connectivism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging
perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved from Retrieved
fromhttp://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Connectivism
Deubel, P. (2003, March). An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional
multimedia design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1), 63-90. Retrieved
December 7, 2010 from http://www.ct4me.net/ multimedia_design.htm
Driscoll, M. (2002). How people learn (and what technology might have to do with it). Retrieved
from http://www.ericdigests.org/ 2003-3/learn.htm
Emerging theories and online learning environments for adults. (2002). In Theories of Educational
Technology. Retrieved November 24l, 2010, fromhttps://sites.google.com/a/boisestate.edu/edtechtheories/
Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical
features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 59-71.
Retrieved from http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com
Jenkins, J. (2006). Constructivism. Encyclopedia of educational leadership and administration. Retrieved
from Retrieved November 6, 2010, from http://www.sage-ereference.com/edleadership/Article_n121.html
Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R. (2009). The Horizon Report (2009 ed.). Retrieved
fromhttp://net.educause.edu/ir/library/ pdf/CSD5612.pdf
Learning (n.d.). Retrieved from LEARNING. (n.d.). Dictionary.com Unabridged. Retrieved December
06, 2010, from Dictionary.com website:http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/LEARNING
Ormrod, J. (2008). Human Learning (5th ed.). New Jersey, NY: Pearson Education, Inc.
Ormrod, J., Schunk, D., & Gredler, M. (2008). Overview. In Learning theories and instruction (Laureate
custom edition) (pp. 1-26). New Jersey, NY: Pearson.
Ormrod, J., Schunk, D., & Gredler, M. (2009). Cognitive information processing theory. InLearning
theories and instruction (Laureate custom edition) (pp. 48-97). New York: Pearson.
Ormrod, J., Schunk, D., & Gredler, M. (2009). Cognitive learning processes. In Learning theories and
instruction (Laureate custom edition) (pp. 98-145). New York: Pearson.
Ormrod, J., Schunk, D., & Gredler, M. (2009). Constructivist theory. In Learning theories and instruction
(Laureate custom edition) (pp. 182-222). New York: Pearson.
Siemens, G. (2005, Jan). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of
Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Retrieved
fromhttp://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
Smith, M. (1999). The behaviourist orientation to learning. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education.
Retrieved December 6, 2010, from http://www.infed.org/biblio/learning-behavourist.htm
Welcome to Word
M. (1999). The cognitive orientation to learning. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education.
5 tipsSmith,
for
simpler
way
to work
Retrieved a
December
6, 2010, from
http://www.infed.org/biblio/learning-cognitive
Smith, M. (1999). The social/situational orientation to learning. The Encyclopedia of Informal Education.
Retrieved December 6, 2010, from http://www.infed.org/biblio/learning-social.htm
Social learning theory: Bandura. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.learning-theories.com/social-learningtheory-bandura.html
Standridge, M. (2002). Behaviorism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and
technolog. Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/
Learn More
Keep going. There are lots more new features and ways to work in Office. Check out our Getting
started with Word 2013 page online to dive right in.