Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 49 views

    Measurement Systems Analysis: Repeatability & Reproducibility

    Uploaded by

    pandaprasad
    This document contains the results of a measurement systems analysis to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of a gaging process. Three appraisers each took ten measurements over multiple trials. The analysis calculated the percentage of variation due to the equipment, appraisers, and parts being measured. It was found that equipment variation accounted for 18.7% of total variation, appraiser variation was 16.99%, and part variation was 96.76%. The total variation of the measurement system was determined to be 0.9348266.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Measurement Systems Analysis: Repeatability & Reproducibility

    Uploaded by

    pandaprasad
    49 views3 pages
    This document contains the results of a measurement systems analysis to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of a gaging process. Three appraisers each took ten measurements over multiple trials. The analysis calculated the percentage of variation due to the equipment, appraisers, and parts being measured. It was found that equipment variation accounted for 18.7% of total variation, appraiser variation was 16.99%, and part variation was 96.76%. The total variation of the measurement system was determined to be 0.9348266.

    Original Description:

    r and r

    Original Title

    randr

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains the results of a measurement systems analysis to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of a gaging process. Three appraisers each took ten measurements over multiple trials. The analysis calculated the percentage of variation due to the equipment, appraisers, and parts being measured. It was found that equipment variation accounted for 18.7% of total variation, appraiser variation was 16.99%, and part variation was 96.76%. The total variation of the measurement system was determined to be 0.9348266.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    49 views3 pages

    Measurement Systems Analysis: Repeatability & Reproducibility

    Uploaded by

    pandaprasad
    This document contains the results of a measurement systems analysis to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of a gaging process. Three appraisers each took ten measurements over multiple trials. The analysis calculated the percentage of variation due to the equipment, appraisers, and parts being measured. It was found that equipment variation accounted for 18.7% of total variation, appraiser variation was 16.99%, and part variation was 96.76%. The total variation of the measurement system was determined to be 0.9348266.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 3

    MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS ANALYSIS

    REPEATABILITY & REPRODUCIBILITY


    GAGE NAME

    DATE

    CHARACTERISTIC

    GAGE TYPE

    SPECIFICATION

    GAGE NUMBER

    TEST NUMBER

    APPRAISER A NAME

    APPRAISER B NAME

    SAMPLE SIZE

    10

    Appraiser/
    Trial #
    A

    1
    1
    2

    AVG'S
    Range
    B
    1
    2
    AVG'S
    Range
    C
    1
    2
    AVG'S
    Range
    Part
    Average

    APPRAISERS

    TRIALS

    APPRAISER C NAME

    10

    0.65
    0.6

    1
    1

    0.85
    0.8

    0.85
    0.95

    0.55
    0.45

    1
    1

    0.95
    0.95

    0.85
    0.8

    1
    1

    0.625
    0.050

    1.000
    0.000

    0.825
    0.050

    0.900
    0.100

    0.500
    0.100

    1.000
    0.000

    0.950
    0.000

    0.825
    0.050

    1.000
    0.000

    0.55
    0.55

    1.05
    0.95

    0.8
    0.75

    0.8
    0.75

    0.4
    0.4

    1
    1.05

    0.95
    0.9

    0.75
    0.7

    1
    0.95

    0.550
    0.000

    1.000
    0.100

    0.775
    0.050

    0.775
    0.050

    0.400
    0.000

    1.025
    0.050

    0.925
    0.050

    0.725
    0.050

    0.975
    0.050

    0.5
    0.55

    1.05
    1

    0.8
    0.8

    0.8
    0.8

    0.45
    0.5

    1
    1.05

    0.95
    0.95

    0.8
    0.8

    1.05
    1.05

    0.525
    0.050

    1.025
    0.050

    0.800
    0.000

    0.800
    0.000

    0.475
    0.050

    1.025
    0.050

    0.950
    0.000

    0.800
    0.000

    1.050
    0.000

    0.5667

    1.0083

    0.8000

    0.8250

    0.4583

    1.0167

    0.9417

    0.7833

    1.0083

    AVG
    0.6
    0.7

    0.830
    0.825

    0.650 Xa
    0.100 Ra
    0.55
    0.5

    0.828
    0.045
    0.785
    0.750

    0.525 Xb
    0.050 Rb
    0.85
    0.8

    0.768
    0.045
    0.825
    0.830

    0.825 Xc
    0.050 Rc
    X
    0.6667 Rp

    0.828
    0.025
    0.808
    0.558

    RANGE VARIATION
    Ra
    Rb
    Rc
    SUM
    Rdoublebar

    0.045
    0.045
    0.025

    D4

    # Trials
    2
    3

    3.267
    2.575

    (D4)
    Rdoublebar x
    =
    0.0383
    3.267 =
    Note: LCL is zero with < 8 trials

    UCLR
    0.125

    0.115
    0.0383

    A2

    # Trials
    2
    3

    1.880
    1.023

    Xbar +
    ( Rbar x
    0.8075 0.0383
    Xbar ( Rbar x
    0.8075

    Max. X

    0.828

    Min. X

    0.768

    X Diff

    0.060

    printed 10/26/2015

    Tolerence =

    292155886.xls

    0.0383

    A2)
    A2)

    =
    1.88 =
    =
    1.88 =

    UCLX
    0.880
    LCLX
    0.735
    # Trials - n

    10

    # Appr. - r

    Page 1 of 3

    GAGE TYPE

    DATE

    TEST NUMBER

    APPRAISER A NAME
    APPRAISER B NAME
    APPRAISER C NAME

    MEASUREMENT UNIT ANALYSIS

    % TOTAL VARIATION (TV)

    REPEATABILITY - EQUIPMENT VARIATION (EV)


    EV = R1 X K1
    EV =
    0.1748

    % EV
    % EV

    K1 (2 trials)=

    =
    =

    100 (EV/TV)
    18.70%

    4.56
    Percent of Tolerance: 100(EV/Tol) =

    #VALUE!

    REPRODUCIBILITY - APPRAISER VARIATION (AV)


    AV = SQ. ROOT ((X DIFF X K2)SQUARED - (EV SQUARED/NR))
    AV = 0.1588254
    K2 (3 appraisers)=
    2.70

    % AV
    % AV

    =
    =

    100(AV/TV)
    16.99%

    Percent of Tolerance: 100(AV/Tol) =


    REPEATABILITY & REPRODUCIBILITY (R&R)

    % R&R
    % R&R

    R&R = SQ. ROOT (EV SQUARED + AV SQUARED)


    R&R =
    0.236179

    % PV
    % PV
    PARTS
    10

    100(R&R/TV)
    25.26%

    Percent of Tolerance: 100(R&R/Tol) =

    PART VARIATION (PV)


    PV = Rp x K3
    PV =
    0.9045

    =
    =

    K3
    1.62

    =
    =

    #VALUE!

    #VALUE!

    100(PV/TV)
    96.76%

    Percent of Tolerance: 100(PV/Tol) =

    #VALUE!

    TOTAL VARIATION (TV)


    TV = SQ. ROOT(R&R SQUARED + PV SQUARED)
    TV = 0.9348266

    Range Chart
    0.140
    0.120

    Range

    0.100
    0.080
    0.060
    0.040
    printed
    10/26/2015
    0.020

    292155886.xls

    Page 2 of 3

    0.000
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Ra

    0.060
    0.040
    0.020
    0.000
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    A

    Trial Number
    B
    C

    UCL

    Mean

    Averages Chart
    Note: You must manually adjust the scale to fit the data.
    1.200
    1.000

    Average

    0.800
    0.600
    0.400
    0.200
    0.000
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
    A
    UCL

    printed 10/26/2015

    Trial Number
    B
    Mean

    292155886.xls

    C
    LCL

    Page 3 of 3

    You might also like