Isothermal Batch Reactor
Isothermal Batch Reactor
Isothermal Batch Reactor
INTRODUCTION
Batch reactors are utilized broadly as a part of industry at all scales. Batch reactors are tanks,
ordinarily gave unsettling and a technique for warmth exchange. This sort of reactor is
essentially utilized for moderately moderate responses of a few hours length of time, subsequent
to the downtime for filling and exhausting vast hardware can be critical. Agitation is utilized to
keep up homogeneity and to enhance heat exchange. Batch reactor is specifically designed for a
detailed study of this process. In this experiment, the change of sodium hydroxide, NaOH
concentration and conductivity is observed. By using the integral method of analysis, the
reaction is found to be second order reaction. The experimental activation energy is determined
as well if the experiment is conducted in different temperatures. The reaction chosen is the
saponification of ethyl acetate by sodium hydroxide. Saponification is a process that produces
soap. Technically it involves base that is NaOH to form sodium salt of a carboxylate.
CH 3COOC 2H5 NaOH CH 3COONa C2H5OH EtAc NaOH NaAc EtOH
Ethyl acetate sodium hydroxide
Time [min]
5
10
15
20
25
o
Table 2: Conversion rate and rate reaction constant at temperature of 45 C
Time (min)
(min)
XA
[1-XA]
5
10
15
20
25
5
10
15
20
25
0.566
0.401
0.393
0.418
0.426
0.188
0.359
0.368
0.339
0.329
XA/ [1-XA]
2.8351
1.1169
1.0679
1.2330
1.2948
K
(L/mol.min)
44.1095
15.6982
10.3163
8.0837
6.5686
T (K)
1/T (K)
lnK
318
3.144710-03
207.14
5.333
vs XA/[1-XA]
3
2.5
2
XA/ [1-XA]2
1.5
1
0.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
(min)
o
Figure 1: Changes in conversion factor according to reaction time at temperature 45 C
In this experiment, the solution ethyl acetate is not conductive whereas sodium hydroxide is
highly conductive. From this relation, the decrease in conductivity that occurs as the reaction
proceeds also indicates a decrease in sodium hydroxide concentration.
5
Since sodium hydroxide is being consumed over time, its concentration declines with time as per
Table 1. By using the integral method, can conclude that the overall reaction rate is second order.
However, the experiment shows inaccurate results in Figure 1. Moreover, the calculated reaction
rate constant and activation energy did not equal for the used temperatures. This is mainly due to
lack of precision in recording the conductivity. From the results obtained from Figure 1, which
settles that increasing the reaction temperature results in an increase in the reaction rate constant.
REFERENCES
1. Kenneth A. ConnorsChemical Kinetics, the study of reaction rates in solution, 1991,
VCH Publishers
2. Levenspiel, O. (1999). Chemical Reaction Engineering (3rd Edition). John Wiley.
3.
APPENDICES
Sample Calculations
CA0 = NNaOH (mole/L)
CA0 = 0.1 mole/L
HCIO =
V HCl N HCl
(moles)
1000
HCIO =
0.02 0.1
=2 106 moles
1000
HCIR = HCIO-
V 1 N1
(mole)
1000
6
HCIR = (2 10 ) -
(0.0295)(0.0825)
=4.3375 107 mole
1000
CA =
HCIR
mole
1000(
)
V SAMP
L
CA =
4.3375 107
mole
1000=0.043375
0.01
L
C A C
XA =
XA =
K=
CA
0.10.043375
=0.5663
0.1
C A C
L
(
)
t C A C A mole min
0
K=
0.10.043375
L
=2.611
5 0.1 0.043375
mole min
1
L
(
)
Kt = S 1 C A mole min ;
0
1
L
=207.14
0.04828 0.1
mole min
10