Oyenuga 249568417 Fundamentals of RCC Design
Oyenuga 249568417 Fundamentals of RCC Design
Oyenuga 249568417 Fundamentals of RCC Design
By
ENGR. VICTOR O. OYENUGA
(HND, BSc(Hons), MSc, DIC, PGD(Comp. Sc.), FNSE, FNIStructE, FNICE, MNIOB
Managing Director: Vasons Concept Consultants Ltd (Consulting Engineers and Town Planners)
ABSTRACT
Structural design is an art and the artist must be convinced of the implications of the final product. The objective of
this paper is to highlight the basic load and design fundamentals that must be observed for the economic and safe
design of the structure. Various load forms are highlighted and practical examples given. Wind load and its
application on the structure are briefly discussed.
Ability to trace the load path up to foundation level is discussed. The various design philosophies are enunciated. To
assist in the design, values of some important parameters are given in tabular form.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Structural and Civil Engineers deal with forces of nature, which can only be predicted to a reasonable extent. For
example, a dam was designed for a 50year rain and one month after its completion a 100year rain fell causing a total
damage to the dam structure. Who is to be blamed? Thus, no engineer could say with all certainly that he has got a
perfect solution to any design problem.
However, as a result of intensive research, experimental and observational data, a level of confidence has been
achieved in virtually all aspects of civil/structural engineering to such a level that a near certainty can be achieved.
The objective of this paper is to discuss the various loads and load forms that must be thoroughly looked into as well as
their application in the design of building structures. In most cases, poor load estimation as well as poor load tracing
lead to collapse of building structures aside poor materials and workmanship. In addition, some basic design
fundamentals are discussed.
Structural loads must be properly assessed and successfully transferred to the founding member. The receiving soil
must also be of such composition and texture so as to receive the imposed load without undue stress. It is a common
believe that all buildings on poor marshy soil be founded on raft foundation. It should be clearly stated here that raft
foundation is NOT a solution to all foundation problems. For example, a soil with 20kN/m 2 bearing capacity imposed
with 50kN/m2 building on raft foundation will definitely sink, the foundation type notwithstanding The building may,
however, not crack, that is, it may tilt in one direction because of the structural rigidity of the foundation and the
superstructure frame. Such a building in question may require short pile footings. On the other extreme, building a
bungalow on raft foundation may be highly uneconomical since simple wide strip foundation may have been very
suitable. The summary of the foregoing is that soil tests and their correct interpretation are necessary even for the most
simple structure especially where the soil structure is very doubtful.
As a guide the structural form and possible foundation type is shown in Table 1.
guidance only and the designer is advised to seek tests information.
Table 1: Suggested Appropriate Foundation Type for Building
Bungalow
2-storey
Type of Buildings
3-5 storey
Medium Rise
High Rise
Strip
Strip
Pad
Pad
Pile
Strip
Wide Strip
Pad
Pile
Pile
Wide Strip
Wide Strip
Raft
Pile
Pile
Raft
Raft
Short Pile
Pile
Pilr
Soil Type
2
Depending on the load type, soil investigation can be limited to penetrometer tests only for relatively good soil and
light loads. For heavier loads a combination of both penetrometer tests and borehole tests are required. The structural
engineer should convince the client of the paramount importance of soil tests and the fact that money to be expended
on the operation is much less than 0.01% of the cost of the structure.
750mm and 900mm are reasonable but may consume over 30% of the total reinforcements for the slab. A span of
1200mm or more may be difficult to manage in terms of deflection. Buildings tend to be disfigured when large span
cantilevers are used. Double cantilever leads to building instability and must be avoided as much as possible.
In most construction sites, it is amazing to notice that all the corners of bungalows and two storey buildings have their
corners blocks replaced with columns. These columns are rarely linked with beams, at most with mass concrete along
the line of external lintels. Some even go to the extent of lining corners of septic tanks and soak-away pits with
reinforced concrete beam and columns. Concrete beam and columns are vertical load bearing members while loads
exerted by septic tank and soak-away pit soil are purely horizontal. The construction of reinforced concrete columns at
corners of non-framed buildings may be counter productive.
Materials
Concrete
- dense (normal)
- light weight
Block
-225mm hollow
- 150mm hollow
Wall finishes-both sides
Screeding
- 37mm thick
Terrazzo Paving
Roofing felt and screed
Asbestos rooting sheet etc.
Amanitas and nails
Basic Weight
24.0
7.0 18.0
2.87
2.15
0.60
0.80
0.022
2.00
0.40
0.30
Unit
kN/m3
-dittokN/m2
-dittokN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
kN/m2
The dead weight must be assessed as much as possible. However, an ultimate partial factor of safety of 1.4 is often
applied. The application of dead load in design of structure is discussed in this paper.
These are transient loads to be carried by the structure and because of their nature are more difficult to determine
precisely. Hence, a more generous partial factor of safety of 1.6 is used. B.S. 6399: Part 1: 1984, deals with the
design loading for buildings. Some values from this Code are as stated in Table 3.
Table 3: Imposed Load for Slabs
S/N
1.
2.
3.
Description
Dwelling units
Class rooms
Place of assembly
4.
Offices
5.
6.
7.
8.
Library
Motor Rooms
Car Park Light
Pedestrian foot path
Values kN/m2
1.5
3.0
4.0
5.0
2.5
5.0
5.0
7.5
2.5
4.0
Wk
Wk
Wk
Wk
Wk
Wk
Wk
Wk
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
(0.83 x 36)2 x
(0.95 x 36)2 x
(0.99 x 36)2 x
(1.01 x 36)2 x
(1.05 x 36)2 x
(1.08 x 36)2 x
(1.10 x 36)2 x
(1.12 x 36)2 x
0.613
0.613
0.613
0.613
0.613
0.613
0.613
0.613
= 547N/m2
= 717
= 779
= 810
= 876
= 927
= 961
= 997
Note: The values of S2 are taken from Table 13 of Reinforced Concrete Designers Handbook by C. E. Reynolds and
J. C. Steedman, 10th Edition. Thus the higher the level of consideration of the forces, the higher the pressure. The
building should be broken down to storeys corresponding to the heights above for purpose of application of these loads.
In this case we have:
Grd to 2nd floor slab
2nd to 3 floor slab
= 0.55kN/m2
= 0.72kN/m2
5
rd
3 to 5 floor slab
5th to 7 floor slab
7th to 10th floor slab
10th to 14th floor slab
14th to 17th floor slab
17th to roof level
= 0.78kN/m
= 0.81kN/m2
= 0.99kN/m2
= 0.93kN/m2
= 0.96kN/m2
=1.00kN/m2
Each is multiplied by the projected width of the building to obtain the force per m run. These in
turn can be calculated as point loads and applied at the floor level as illustrated in Figure 1.
5th
Figure 1:
7.8kN/m.
2850
22.23kN
2850
21.38kN
4th
3rd
7.2kN/m
2850
6.6kN/m
Please note:
2nd
19.67kN
2850
1st
Wind
-
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.2
Under the working load, the deformation of the structure must not impair the appearance, durability and/or
performance of the structure and
The structure must be economical, that is, the factor of safety should not be too large to the extent that the
cost of the structure becomes prohibitive with no additional major advantage except for robustness.
These requirements call for good assessment of the intending loads, right choice of materials and sound workmanship.
To ensure these, the various components forming the reinforced concrete and the concrete itself must pass the various
tests as detailed in the controlling code of practice.
6
The determination of the size of the structural member and the amount of reinforcement required to enable it
withstand the forces or other effects to which it will be subjected is the object of design or detailed design. Detailed
design is, however, only one of the two main parts of structural design, the other being the primary design. This is the
initial planning or arranging of the members so that the external forces or loads on the structure are transmitted to the
foundation in the most economical manner consistent with the purpose of the structure. This is borne out of
experience, from a study of existing structures and from comparison of alternative designs.
4.2 Shearing Force and Moment Envelopes - Slab and Beam Design
Most designers assume uniform loading of full dead and live loads on the structure. The implication of this is to
produce maximum bending moments and shearing forces at the supports. Alternate loading of maximum and
minimum loads on the other hand will produce higher span moments especially at the end support. This could be
beneficial.
Section 3.2.1.2.2 of B.S.8110:Part 1: 1997 states that it will be sufficient to consider two loading cases as follows:
a) All spans loaded with 1.4Gk + 1.6Q and
b) The spans loaded alternatively with (1.4Gk + 1.6Qk) and 1.0Gk
Where:
Hence, if Gk = 5.8 and Q = 1.5 we have the following loading regime on the slab in Figure 2.
1.4Gk + 1.6Q
= 1.4(5.80) + 1.6(1.5)
= 10.52kN/m2
1.0Gk
= 1.0 x 5.80
= 5.80kN/m2
Figure 2:
10.52kN/m
6000
5000
6000
10.52kN/m
10.52kN/m
5.80kN/m
5000
6000
6000
These should be analyzed and the maximum results picked for the purposes of design. The single case loading can be
used with moment re-distribution.
Top
1.0
4.5
6.0
Next to Top
1.0
2.0
2.3
Lower
1.0
1.4
1.8
Soil/geotechnical investigations must be carried out prior to any foundation and where possible, the building could
be broken down into several sections and different types of foundations used. This is illustrated in the example shown
as Figure 3.
In this figure, a proposed Church building at Ikate, Surulere, Lagos, the congregation area is lightly loaded and the side
columns could be supported on single pad, while the rear columns could be joined together on a continuous reinforced
concrete footing. In real life, the soil permissible bearing capacity is 45kN/m 2.
In view of the heavy loading towards the front (Ground floor, First floor and Second floor), a raft foundation would be
the most suitable. Efforts should be made to ensure that the resulting bearing pressure under each type of foundation is
the same. The foundations could be linked up with ground beams.
Altar
6000
Congregational
6000
Sitting
6000
6000
3600
5400
4200
4200
Altar
5400
4200
Entrance
Porch
5.0 CONCLUSION
To conclude, here is a quotation from Man on the Job leaflets, published by Cement and Concrete Association, United
Kingdom, titled IT DEPENDS ON YOU. It says:
A good concrete job is only good, strong, long-lasting, good-looking and economical to build, if every man on the
job shares in making it so.
A good concrete building or road or bridge does not only depend on a good designer or a clever engineer: it depends
on good materials, accurate batching, the right amount of water and thorough mixing: it depends on well-placed
reinforcement, well-made formwork, careful compacting: it depends on good finish. No stage is unimportant. One
mans carelessness can let down the whole job: every mans care can make it a job to be proud of.
SO IT REALLY DOES DEPEND ON YOU
Good structural design must be backed up by good construction materials, good workmanship, and good supervision.
Structures are to be designed to provide safe accommodation and not a coffin for mass burial.
References:
1.
Simplified Reinforced Concrete Design, by Victor O. Oyenuga, 2nd Edition, Asros Ltd., Lagos, 2005.
2.
Design and Construction of Foundations, by Victor O. Oyenuga, Asros Ltd., Lagos, 2004.
3.
4.