Hypoglikemia

S C I E N T I F I C
S T A T E M E N T
Hypoglycemia and Diabetes: A Report

of a Workgroup of the American
Diabetes Association and The Endocrine
Society
ELIZABETH R. SEAQUIST, MD1
JOHN ANDERSON, MD2
BELINDA CHILDS, ARNP, MN, BC-ADM, CDE3
PHILIP CRYER, MD4
SAMUEL DAGOGO-JACK, MD, MBBS, MSC5
LISA FISH, MD6

SIMON R. HELLER, MD7
HENRY RODRIGUEZ, MD8
JAMES ROSENZWEIG, MD9
ROBERT VIGERSKY, MD10
OBJECTIVEdTo review the evidence about the impact of hypoglycemia on patients with
diabetes that has become available since the past reviews of this subject by the American Diabetes
Association and The Endocrine Society and to provide guidance about how this new information
should be incorporated into clinical practice.
PARTICIPANTSdFive members of the American Diabetes Association and ve members of
The Endocrine Society with expertise in different aspects of hypoglycemia were invited by the Chair,
who is a member of both, to participate in a planning conference call and a 2-day meeting that was
also attended by staff from both organizations. Subsequent communications took place via e-mail
and phone calls. The writing group consisted of those invitees who participated in the writing of the
manuscript. The workgroup meeting was supported by educational grants to the American Diabetes
Association from Lilly USA, LLC and Novo Nordisk and sponsorship to the American Diabetes
Association from Sano. The sponsors had no input into the development of or content of the report.
EVIDENCEdThe writing group considered data from recent clinical trials and other studies to
update the prior workgroup report. Unpublished data were not used. Expert opinion was used to
develop some conclusions.
CONSENSUS PROCESSdConsensus was achieved by group discussion during conference calls and face-to-face meetings, as well as by iterative revisions of the written document. The
document was reviewed and approved by the American Diabetes Associations Professional
Practice Committee in October 2012 and approved by the Executive Committee of the Board
of Directors in November 2012 and was reviewed and approved by The Endocrine Societys
Clinical Affairs Core Committee in October 2012 and by Council in November 2012.
CONCLUSIONSdThe workgroup reconrmed the previous denitions of hypoglycemia in
diabetes, reviewed the implications of hypoglycemia on both short- and long-term outcomes,
considered the implications of hypoglycemia on treatment outcomes, presented strategies to
prevent hypoglycemia, and identied knowledge gaps that should be addressed by future research. In addition, tools for patients to report hypoglycemia at each visit and for clinicians to
document counseling are provided.
Diabetes Care 36:13841395, 2013
n 2005, the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia

released a report entitled Dening and
Reporting Hypoglycemia in Diabetes (1).
In that report, recommendations were
primarily made to advise the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) on how
hypoglycemia should be used as an end
point in studies of new treatments for diabetes. In 2009, The Endocrine Society
released a clinical practice guideline entitled Evaluation and Management of
Adult Hypoglycemic Disorders, which
summarized how clinicians should manage hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes (2). Since then, new evidence has
become available that links hypoglycemia
with adverse outcomes in older patients
with type 2 diabetes (36) and in children
with type 1 diabetes (7,8). To provide
guidance about how this new information
should be incorporated into clinical practice, the American Diabetes Association
and The Endocrine Society assembled a
new Workgroup on Hypoglycemia in
April 2012 to address the following questions:
1. How should hypoglycemia in diabetes
be dened and reported?
2. What are the implications of hypoglycemia on both short- and long-term
outcomes in people with diabetes?
3. What are the implications of hypoglycemia on treatment targets for patients with diabetes?
c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
From the 1Department of Medicine, University of

Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; 2The Frist
Clinic, Nashville, Tennessee; 3Mid-America Diabetes Associates, Wichita, Kansas; the 4Division
of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,
Washington University School of Medicine, Saint
Louis, Missouri; the 5Division of Endocrinology,
Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Tennessee
Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee,
6
Diabetes, Metabolism and Endocrinology/
Internal Medicine, Park Nicollet Clinic, Saint
Louis Park, Minnesota; the 7Academic Unit of
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, School
of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University
1384
DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, MAY 2013
of Shefeld, Shefeld, U.K.; the 8Diabetes Center,

University of South Florida College of Medicine,
Tampa, Florida; 9Diabetes Services, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine,
Boston, Massachusetts; and the 10Diabetes Institute, Walter Reed National Military Medical
Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Corresponding author: Elizabeth R. Seaquist, seaqu001@
umn.edu.
DOI: 10.2337/dc12-2480
This report was reviewed and approved by the
American Diabetes Associations Professional
Practice Committee in October 2012 and approved by the Executive Committee of the Board
of Directors in November 2012 and was reviewed

and approved by The Endocrine Societys Clinical
Affairs Core Committee in October 2012 and by
Council in November 2012.
This article has been copublished in the Journal of
Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
A slide set summarizing this article is available online.
2013 by the American Diabetes Association and
The Endocrine Society. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use
is educational and not for prot, and the work
is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
care.diabetesjournals.org
Seaquist and Associates

4. What strategies are known to prevent
hypoglycemia, and what are the clinical recommendations for those at risk
for hypoglycemia?
5. What are the current knowledge gaps
in our understanding of hypoglycemia, and what research is necessary to
ll these gaps?
How should hypoglycemia in
diabetes be dened and
reported?dHypoglycemia puts patients at risk for injury and death. Consequently the workgroup denes iatrogenic
hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes as
all episodes of an abnormally low plasma
glucose concentration that expose the
individual to potential harm. A single
threshold value for plasma glucose concentration that denes hypoglycemia in diabetes cannot be assigned because glycemic
thresholds for symptoms of hypoglycemia
(among other responses) shift to lower
plasma glucose concentrations after recent
antecedent hypoglycemia (912) and to
higher plasma glucose concentrations in patients with poorly controlled diabetes and
infrequent hypoglycemia (13).
Nonetheless, an alert value can be
dened that draws the attention of both
patients and caregivers to the potential
harm associated with hypoglycemia. The
workgroup (1) suggests that patients at
risk for hypoglycemia (i.e., those treated
with a sulfonylurea, glinide, or insulin)
should be alert to the possibility of developing hypoglycemia at a self-monitored
plasma glucosedor continuous glucose
monitoring subcutaneous glucosed
concentration of #70 mg/dL (#3.9
mmol/L). This alert value is data driven
and pragmatic (14). Given the limited
accuracy of the monitoring devices, it approximates the lower limit of the normal
postabsorptive plasma glucose concentration (15), the glycemic thresholds for activation of glucose counterregulatory
systems in nondiabetic individuals (15),
and the upper limit of plasma glucose level
reported to reduce counterregulatory responses to subsequent hypoglycemia
(11). Because it is higher than the glycemic
threshold for symptoms in both nondiabetic individuals and those with wellcontrolled diabetes (9,13,14), it generally
allows time to prevent a clinical hypoglycemic episode and provides some margin for
the limited accuracy of monitoring devices
at low-glucose levels. People with diabetes
need not always self-treat at an estimated
glucose concentration of #70 mg/dL
(#3.9 mmol/L). Options other than
carbohydrate ingestion include repeating

the test in the short term, changing behavior
(e.g., avoiding driving or elective exercise until the glucose level is higher), and adjusting
the treatment regimen. Although this alert
value has been debated (9,13,14), a plasma concentration of #70 mg/dL (#3.9
mmol/L) can be used as a cut-off value in
the classication of hypoglycemia in diabetes.
Consistent with past recommendations (1), the workgroup suggests the following classication of hypoglycemia in
diabetes:
1) Severe hypoglycemia. Severe hypoglycemia is an event requiring assistance
of another person to actively administer
carbohydrates, glucagon, or take other
corrective actions. Plasma glucose concentrations may not be available during
an event, but neurological recovery following the return of plasma glucose to
normal is considered sufcient evidence
that the event was induced by a low
plasma glucose concentration.
2) Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia is an event during which typical
symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration #70 mg/dL (#3.9 mmol/L).
3) Asymptomatic hypoglycemia. Asymptomatic hypoglycemia is an event not
accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma
glucose concentration #70 mg/dL (#3.9
mmol/L).
4) Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia. Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia
is an event during which symptoms typical
of hypoglycemia are not accompanied by a
plasma glucose determination but that was
presumably caused by a plasma glucose
concentration #70 mg/dL (#3.9 mmol/L).
5) Pseudo-hypoglycemia. Pseudohypoglycemia is an event during which
the person with diabetes reports any of
the typical symptoms of hypoglycemia
with a measured plasma glucose concentration .70 mg/dL (.3.9 mmol/L) but approaching that level.
The challenge of measuring glucose
accurately
Currently, two technologies are available to
measure glucose in outpatients: capillary
measurement with point-of-care (POC)
glucose meters (self-monitored blood glucose [SMBG]) and interstitial measurement with continuous glucose monitors
(CGMs), both retrospective and real time.
The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and FDA standards
require that POC meters analytical accuracy be within 20% of the actual value in
95% of samples with glucose levels $75
mg/dL and 615 mg/dL for samples
with glucose ,75 mg/dL. Despite this relatively large permissible variation, Freckmann et al. (16) found that only 15 of 27
meters on the market in Europe several
years ago met the current analytical standards of 615 mg/dL in the hypoglycemia
range, 2 of 27 met 610 mg/dL, and none
were capable of measuring 65 mg/dL.
The need for accurate meters in the
,75 mg/dL range is essential in insulintreated patients, whether they are outpatients or inpatients, but it is less important
in those outpatients who are on medications that rarely cause hypoglycemia. In
critical care units, where the accuracy of
POC meters is particularly crucial, their
performance may be compromised by
medications (vasopressors, acetaminophen), treatments (oxygen), and clinical
states (hypotension, anemia) (17). Karon
et al. (18) translated these measurement
errors into potential insulin-dosing errors
using simulation modeling and found
that if there were a total measurement
error of 20%, 1- and 2-step errors in insulin dose would occur 45% and 6% of
the time, respectively, in a tight glycemic
control protocol. Such imprecision may
affect the safe implementation of insulin
infusion protocols in critical care units
and may account in part for the high hypoglycemia rates in most trials of inpatient intensive glycemic control.
Retrospective and real-time CGMs
represent an evolving technology that
has made considerable progress in overall
(point 1 rate) accuracy. However, the accuracy of CGMs in the hypoglycemic
range is poor as demonstrated by error
grid analysis (19,20). With existing realtime CGMs, accuracy can be achieved
in only 6073% of samples in the range
of 4080 mg/dL (21,22). Because the accuracy of CGMs, like POC meters, is negatively affected by multiple factors in
hospitalized patients and they are calibrated with POC meters affected by those
same factors, CGMs are not recommended
for glycemic management in hospitalized
patients at this time (17).
What are the implications
of hypoglycemia on both
short- and long-term
outcomes in people with
diabetes?dIatrogenic hypoglycemia
is more frequent in patients with profound
endogenous insulin deciencydtype
1385
Scientic Statement
1 diabetes and advanced type 2 diabetesdand its incidence increases with the
duration of diabetes (23). It is caused by
treatment with a sulfonylurea, glinide, or
insulin and occurs about two to three
times more frequently in type 1 diabetes
than in type 2 diabetes (23,24). Event rates
for severe hypoglycemia for patients with
type 1 diabetes range from 115 (24) to 320
(23) per 100 patient-years. Severe hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes
has been shown to occur at rates of 35 (24)
to 70 (23) per 100 patient-years. However,
because type 2 diabetes is much more
prevalent than type 1 diabetes, most episodes of hypoglycemia, including severe
hypoglycemia, occur in people with type
2 diabetes (25).
There is no doubt that hypoglycemia
can be fatal (26). In addition to case reports of hypoglycemic deaths in patients
with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, four recent reports of mortality rates in series of
patients indicate that 4% (27), 6% (28),
7% (29), and 10% (30) of deaths of patients with type 1 diabetes were caused by
hypoglycemia. A temporal relationship
between extremely low subcutaneous
glucose concentrations and death in a
patient with type 1 diabetes who was
wearing a CGM device and was found
dead in bed has been reported (31). Although profound and prolonged hypoglycemia can cause brain death, most
episodes of fatal hypoglycemia are probably the result of other mechanisms, such
as ventricular arrhythmias (26). In this
section, we will consider the effects of
hypoglycemia on the development of hypoglycemia unawareness and how iatrogenic hypoglycemia may affect outcomes
in specic patient groups.
Hypoglycemia unawareness and
hypoglycemia-associated autonomic
failure
Acute hypoglycemia in patients with diabetes can lead to confusion, loss of
consciousness, seizures, and even death,
but how a particular patient responds to a
drop in glucose appears to depend on
how frequently that patient experiences
hypoglycemia. Recurrent hypoglycemia
has been shown to reduce the glucose level
that precipitates the counterregulatory
response necessary to restore euglycemia
during a subsequent episode of hypoglycemia (1012). As a result, patients with
frequent hypoglycemia do not experience
the symptoms from the adrenergic response to a fall in glucose until the blood
glucose reaches lower and lower levels. For
1386
some individuals, the level that triggers the

response is below the glucose level associated with neuroglycopenia. The rst sign of
hypoglycemia in these patients is confusion, and they often must rely on the assistance of others to recognize and treat low
blood glucose. Such individuals are said to
have developed hypoglycemia unawareness. Defective glucose counterregulation
(the result of loss of a decrease in insulin
production and an increase in glucagon release along with an attenuated increase in
epinephrine) and hypoglycemia unawareness (the result of an attenuated increase in
sympathoadrenal activity) are the components of hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure (HAAF) in patients with
diabetes. HAAF is a form of functional sympathoadrenal failure that is most often
caused by recent antecedent iatrogenic
hypoglycemia (25) and is at least partly reversible by scrupulous avoidance of hypoglycemia (3234). Indeed, HAAF has been
shown to be maintained by recurrent iatrogenic hypoglycemia (33,34). The development of HAAF is associated with a 25-fold
(35) or greater (36) increased risk of severe
hypoglycemia during intensive glycemic
therapy. It is important to distinguish
HAAF from classical autonomic neuropathy, which may occur as one form of
diabetic neuropathy. Impaired sympathoadrenal activation is generally conned to
the response to hypoglycemia, and autonomic activities in organs such as the heart,
gastrointestinal tract, and bladder appear to
be unaffected.
Clinically, HAAF can be viewed as
both adaptive and maladaptive. On the
one hand, patients with hypoglycemia
unawareness and type 1 diabetes appear
to perform better on tests of cognitive
function during hypoglycemia than do
patients who are able to detect hypoglycemia normally (37). In addition, the time
necessary for full cognitive recovery after
restoration of euglycemia appears to be
faster in patients who have hypoglycemia
unawareness than in patients with normal
detection of hypoglycemia (37). The
HAAF habituation of the sympathoadrenal response to recurrent hypoglycemic
stress in humans (38) may be analogous
to the phenomenon of habituation of the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical
response to recurrent restraint stress in
rats (39). Rats subjected to recurrent
moderate hypoglycemia had less brain
cell death (40) and less mortality (41)
during or following marked hypoglycemia than those not subjected to recurrent
hypoglycemia.
On the other hand, HAAF is clearly

maladaptive since defective glucose counterregulation and hypoglycemia unawareness substantially increase the risk
of severe hypoglycemia with its morbidity
and potential mortality (26). A particularly low plasma glucose concentration might trigger a robust, potentially
fatal sympathoadrenal discharge. Lifethreatening episodes of hypoglycemia
need not be frequent to be devastating.
Impact of hypoglycemia on children
with diabetes
Hypoglycemia is a common problem in
children with type 1 diabetes because of
the challenges presented by insulin dosing,
variable eating patterns, erratic activity, and
the limited ability of small children to
detect hypoglycemia. The infant, young
child, and even the adolescent typically
exhibit unpredictable feedingdnot eating all the anticipated food at a meal
and snacking unpredictably between
mealsdand have prolonged periods of
fasting overnight that increase the risk of
hypoglycemia. Selecting the correct prandial dose of insulin is therefore often difcult. Very low insulin requirements for
basal and mealtime dosing in the infant
and young child frequently require use
of miniscule basal rates in pump therapy
and one-half unit dosing increments with
injections. Management rarely requires
the use of diluted insulin, e.g., 10 units
per mL. Infants and toddlers may not recognize the symptoms of hypoglycemia
and lack the ability to effectively communicate their distress. Caregivers must be
particularly aware that changes in behavior such as a loss of temper may be a sign of
hypoglycemia.
Puberty is associated with insulin
resistance, while at the same time the
normal developmental stages of adolescence may lead to inattention to diabetes
and increased risk for hypoglycemia. As
children grow, they often have widely
uctuating levels of activity during the
day, which puts them at risk for hypoglycemia. Minimizing the impact of hypoglycemia on children with diabetes
requires the education and engagement
of parents, patients, and other caregivers
in the management of the disease (42,43).
The youngest patients are most vulnerable to the adverse consequences of
hypoglycemia. Ongoing maturation of
the central nervous system puts these
children at greater risk for cognitive deficits as a consequence of hypoglycemia
(44). Recent studies have examined the

impact of hypoglycemia on cognitive
function and cerebral structure in children and found that those who experience this complication before the age of
5 years seem to be more affected than
those who do not have hypoglycemia until later (7). The long-term impact of hypoglycemia on cognition before the age of
5 years is unknown.
Impact of hypoglycemia on adults
with type 1 diabetes
Landmark data on the impact of hypoglycemia on adults with type 1 diabetes
come from the Diabetes Control and
Complications Trial (DCCT) and its
follow-up study, where cognition has been
systematically measured over time. In this
cohort, performance on a comprehensive
battery of neurocognitive tests at 18 years
of follow-up was the same in participants
with and without a history of severe
hypoglycemia (28). Despite such reassuring ndings, recent investigation with
advanced imaging techniques has demonstrated that adults with type 1 diabetes appear to call upon a greater volume of the
brain to perform a working memory task
during hypoglycemia (45). These ndings
suggest that adults with type 1 diabetes
must recruit more regions to preserve
cognitive function during hypoglycemia
than adults without the disease. More
work will be necessary to understand
the signicance of these observations on
the long-term cognitive ability of adults
with type 1 diabetes.
Impact of hypoglycemia on patients
with type 2 diabetes
There is growing evidence that patients
with type 2 diabetes might be particularly
vulnerable to adverse events associated
with hypoglycemia. Over the last decade,
three large trials examined the effect of
glucose lowering on cardiovascular
events in patients with type 2 diabetes:
ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes), ADVANCE (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease:
Preterax and Diamicron MR Controlled
Evaluation), and VADT (Veterans Affairs
Diabetes Trial). Between them, a total of
24,000 patients with high cardiovascular
risk were randomly assigned to either intensive glycemic control or standard therapy (35). In each, subjects who were
randomly assigned to the intensive arm
experienced more episodes of hypoglycemia than did those who were randomly
assigned to the standard treatment arm.
In the ACCORD trial, subjects who were
randomly assigned to the intensive arm

also experienced a 20% increase in mortality, and the glycemic control study was
stopped early due to this nding. A relationship between mortality and randomization to intensive glucose control was not
observed in ADVANCE or VADT, although VADT was underpowered to explore this relationship. A number of
explanations have been offered to explain
the ndings of ACCORD, including
chance, greater weight gain, and specic
medication effects, but perhaps the most
convincing candidate was hypoglycemia,
which was threefold higher in the intensive arm of ACCORD (4).
In the opinion of the blinded adjudication committee assigned to investigate
mortality in ACCORD, hypoglycemia was
judged to have a denite role in only one
death, a probable role in three deaths,
and a possible role in 38 deaths (46),
which represents a role in less than 10%
of the deaths recorded in the study population while the glycemic intervention
was active. The investigators thus suggest
that hypoglycemia at the time of death
was probably not responsible for the increased mortality rate in the intensive arm
of ACCORD. Since glycemia was not measured at the time of death in any of the
ACCORD subjects, we may never know.
However, the potential lethal mechanisms
that might be provoked by hypoglycemia
could cause mortality downstream of the
hypoglycemic event, increasing the difculty in establishing cause and effect.
All three trials clearly demonstrated
that an episode of severe hypoglycemia
was associated with an increased risk of
subsequent mortality. In ACCORD, those
who had one or more severe hypoglycemic episodes had higher rates of death
than those without such episodes across
both study arms (hazard ratio 1.41 [95%
CI 1.031.93]) (46). One-third of all
deaths were due to cardiovascular disease, and hypoglycemia was associated
with higher cardiovascular mortality. In
VADT, a recent severe hypoglycemic
event was the strongest independent
predictor of death at 90 days (3). In
ADVANCE, where rates of hypoglycemia
were low, a similar pattern was found
(47). Of course, in post hoc analyses a
causal relationship cannot be established
with certainty. It is possible that the association between hypoglycemia and death
may be merely an indicator for vulnerability for death from any cause.
The relationship between hypoglycemia and subsequent cognitive function in
patients with type 2 diabetes has also been

investigated. In a large population study,
hypoglycemic episodes that required hospitalization or a visit to the emergency
department between 1980 and 2002 were
associated with approximately double the
risk of incident dementia after 2003 (6).
However, since the study population did
not undergo detailed tests of cognitive
function prior to 2003, it is possible that
those with incident dementia actually
had mild cognitive dysfunction prior to
experiencing the episode(s) of severe
hypoglycemia. The possibility that mild
cognitive dysfunction might increase the
risk of experiencing severe hypoglycemia
has been supported by analyses from the
ACCORD study (48). In the ACCORD
MIND (Memory IN Diabetes) study, in
which cognitive function was assessed longitudinally, no difference was noted in the
rate at which cognitive performance declined over time in subjects randomly assigned to the intensive versus the standard
glucose arms despite the fact that they experienced three times as much hypoglycemia
(49). Future investigation will need to address this question because the existing data
are somewhat contradictory.
Impact of hypoglycemia on the
elderly
Patients in the older age-groups are
especially vulnerable to hypoglycemia.
Epidemiological studies show that hypoglycemia is the most frequent metabolic
complication experienced by older adults
in the U.S. (50). Although severe hypoglycemia is common in older individuals with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes,
patients with type 2 diabetes tend to
have longer hospital stays and greater
medical costs. The most signicant predictors of this condition are advanced
age, recent hospitalization, and polypharmacy, as shown in a study of Tennessee
Medicare patients (51). Age-related declines in renal function and hepatic enzyme activity may interfere with the
metabolism of sulfonylureas and insulin,
thereby potentiating their hypoglycemic
effects. The vulnerability of the elderly to
severe hypoglycemia may be partially related to a progressive age-related decrease
in b-adrenergic receptor function (52).
Age-related impairment in counterregulatory hormone responses has been described in elderly patients with diabetes,
especially with respect to glucagon and
growth hormone (53). Symptoms of neuroglycopenia are more prevalent (54).
With the prolonged duration of type 2
1387
Scientic Statement
diabetes as is often seen in the elderly patient, the glucagon response to hypoglycemia is virtually absent (55). The
intensication of glycemic control in the
elderly patient is associated with an increased reduction in the plasma glucose
thresholds for epinephrine release and for
the appearance of hypoglycemia (56). As a
result, changes in the level of glycemic control have a marked impact on the risk of
developing hypoglycemia in the elderly.
Older adults with diabetes have a
disproportionately high number of clinical complications and comorbidities, all
of which can be exacerbated by and
sometimes contribute to episodes of hypoglycemia. Older adults with diabetes
are at much higher risk for the geriatric
syndrome, which includes falls, incontinence, frailty, cognitive impairment, and
depressive symptoms (57). The cognitive
and executive dysfunction associated
with the geriatric syndrome interferes
with the patients ability to perform selfcare activities appropriately and follow
the treatment regimen (58).
To minimize the risk of hypoglycemia
in the elderly, careful education regarding
the symptoms and treatment of hypoglycemia, with regular reinforcement, is extremely important because of the
recognized gaps in the knowledge base
of these individuals (59). In addition, it is
important to assess the elderly for functional status as part of the overall clinical
assessment in order to properly apply
individualized glycemic control goals.
Arbitrary short-acting insulin sliding
scales, which are used much too often in
long-term care facilities (60), should be
avoided, and glyburide should be discontinued in favor of shorter-acting insulin
secretagogues or medications that do
not cause hypoglycemia. The recently
published 2012 Beers list of prohibited
medications in long-term care facilities
specically lists insulin sliding scales
and glyburide as treatment modalities
that should be avoided (61). Complex
regimens requiring multiple decision
points should be simplied, especially
for patients with decreased functional status. In addition, caregivers and staff in
long-term care facilities need to be educated on the causes and risks of hypoglycemia and the proper surveillance and
treatment of this condition.
Impact of hypoglycemia on
hospitalized patients
Persons with diabetes are three times
more likely to be hospitalized than those
1388
without diabetes, and approximately 25%

of hospitalized patients (including people
without a history of diabetes) have hyperglycemia (6265). Inpatient hyperglycemia has been associated with prolonged
hospital length of stay and with numerous
adverse outcomes including mortality
(64,6668). The understandable zeal to
minimize the adverse consequences of inpatient hyperglycemia, together with the
demonstration that intensive glycemic
control improved outcomes in surgical
intensive care unit (ICU) patients (69),
led to widespread adoption of aggressive
glucose management among ICU patients. However, subsequent studies
showed that such aggressive lowering of
glycemia in the ICU is not uniformly benecial, markedly increases the risk of severe
hypoglycemia, and may be associated with
increased mortality (7074).
The true incidence and prevalence of
hypoglycemia among hospitalized patients with diabetes are not known precisely. In a retrospective study of 31,970
patients admitted to the general wards of
an academic medical center in 2007, a
total of 3,349 patients (10.5%) had at
least one episode of hypoglycemia (#70
mg/dL) (75). In another review of 5,365
inpatients admitted to ICUs, 102 (1.9%)
had at least one episode of severe hypoglycemia (,40 mg/dL) (76). The risk factors for inpatient hypoglycemia include
older age, presence of comorbidities, diabetes, increasing number of antidiabetic
agents, tight glycemic control, septic
shock, renal insufciency, mechanical ventilation, and severity of illness (75,76).
With regard to impact, a retrospective
analysis of 4,368 admissions involving
2,582 diabetic patients admitted to the
general ward indicated that severe hypoglycemia (#50 mg/dL) was associated
with increased length of stay and greater
odds of inpatient death and death within 1
year of hospital discharge (77).
Impact of hypoglycemia during
pregnancy
Maintaining blood glucose control in pregnancy as close to that of healthy pregnant
women is important in minimizing the
negative effects on the mother and the fetus
(78). This is true for women with pregestational type 1 or type 2 diabetes, as well for
those with gestational diabetes mellitus.
Normal blood glucose levels during pregnancy are 20% lower than in nonpregnant
women (79), making the denition and detection of hypoglycemia more challenging.
For women with type 1 diabetes, severe
hypoglycemia occurs 35 times more frequently in the rst trimester and at a lower
rate in the third trimester when compared
with the incidence in the year preceding the
pregnancy (80). Risk factors for severe hypoglycemia in pregnancy include a history
of severe hypoglycemia in the preceding
year, impaired hypoglycemia awareness,
long duration of diabetes, low HbA 1c
in early pregnancy, uctuating plasma
glucose levels, and excessive use of supplementary insulin between meals. Surprisingly, nausea and vomiting during
pregnancy did not appear to add signicant
risk. When pregnant and nonpregnant
women are compared with CGM, mild hypoglycemia (dened by the authors as
blood glucose ,60 mg/dL) is more common in all pregnant women, but equally
so regardless of whether or not they have
diabetes, either pregestational or gestational (81). Hypoglycemia is generally
without risk for the fetus as long as the
mother avoids injury during the episode.
For women with preexisting diabetes, insulin requirements rise throughout the
pregnancy and then drop precipitously at
the time of delivery of the placenta, requiring an abrupt reduction in insulin dosing to
avoid postdelivery hypoglycemia. Breastfeeding may also be a risk factor for hypoglycemia in women with insulin-treated
diabetes (82).
Impact of hypoglycemia on quality of
life and activities of daily living
Hypoglycemia and the fear of hypoglycemia have a signicant impact on qualityof-life measures in patients with both type
1 and type 2 diabetes (83). Nocturnal hypoglycemia in particular may impact
ones sense of well-being on the following
day because of its impact on sleep quantity and quality (84). Patients with recurrent hypoglycemia have been found to
have chronic mood disorders including
depression and anxiety (85,86), although
it is hard to establish cause and effect between hypoglycemia and mood changes.
Interpersonal relationships may suffer
as a result of hypoglycemia in patients
with diabetes. In-depth interviews of a
small group of otherwise healthy young
adults with type 1 diabetes revealed the
presence of interpersonal conict including fears of dependency and loss of control. These adults also reported difculty
talking about issues related to hypoglycemia with signicant others (87). This difculty may carry over to their work life,
where hypoglycemia has been linked to
reduced productivity (88). Hypoglycemia

also impairs ones ability to drive a car
(8991), and many jurisdictions require
documentation that severe hypoglycemia
is not occurring before persons with diabetes are permitted to have a license to
operate a motor vehicle (92). However,
impaired awareness of hypoglycemia
has not consistently been associated
with an increased risk of car collisions
(9295).
What are the implications of
hypoglycemia on treatment
targets for patients with
diabetes?dThe glycemic target established for any given patient should
depend on the patients age, life expectancy, comorbidities, preferences, and
an assessment of how hypoglycemia
might impact his or her life. This
patient-centered approach requires that
clinicians spend time developing an individualized treatment plan with each patient. For very young children, the risks of
severe hypoglycemia on brain development may require a strategy that attempts
to avoid hypoglycemia at all costs. For
healthy adults with diabetes, a reasonable
glycemic goal might be the lowest HbA1c
that does not cause severe hypoglycemia,
preserves awareness of hypoglycemia,
and results in an acceptable number of
documented episodes of symptomatic
hypoglycemia. With current therapies,
a strategy that completely avoids hypoglycemia may not be possible in patients with
type 1 diabetes who strive to minimize
their risks of developing the microvascular
complications of the disease. However,
glycemic goals might reasonably be relaxed in patients with long-standing type
1 diabetes and advanced complications or
in those who are free of complications but
have a limited life expectancy because of
another disease process. In such patients,
the glycemic goal could be to achieve glucose levels sufciently low to prevent
symptoms of hyperglycemia.
For patients with type 2 diabetes, the
risk of hypoglycemia depends on the
medications used (96). Early in the course
of the disease, most patients are treated
with lifestyle changes and metformin, neither of which causes hypoglycemia.
Therefore, an HbA1c of ,7% is appropriate for many patients with recent-onset
type 2 diabetes. As the disease progresses,
it is likely that medications that increase
the risk of hypoglycemia will be added.
This, plus the presence of complications
or comorbidities that limit life expectancy, means that glycemic goals may
need to be less aggressive. While the benets of achieving an HbA1c of ,7% may
continue to be advocated for patients with
type 2 diabetes at risk for microvascular
complications and with sufcient life expectancy, less aggressive targets may be
appropriate in those with known cardiovascular disease, extensive comorbidities,
or limited life expectancy.
Older individuals with gait imbalance
and frailty may experience a life-changing
injury if they fall during a hypoglycemia
episode, so avoiding hypoglycemia is
paramount in such patients. Patients
with cognitive dysfunction may have
difculty adhering to a complicated treatment strategy designed to achieve a low
HbA1c (48). Such patients will benet
from a simplication of the treatment
strategy with a goal to prevent hypoglycemia as much as possible. Furthermore,
the benets of aggressive glycemic therapy in those affected are unclear.
What strategies are known
to prevent hypoglycemia,
and what are the clinical
recommendations for those
at risk for hypoglycemia?d
Recurrent hypoglycemia increases the
risk of severe hypoglycemia and the development of hypoglycemia unawareness
and HAAF. Effective approaches known
to decrease the risk of iatrogenic hypoglycemia include patient education,
dietary and exercise modications, medication adjustment, careful glucose monitoring by the patient, and conscientious
surveillance by the clinician.
Patient education
There is limited research related to the
inuence of self-management education
on the incidence or prevention of hypoglycemia. However, there is clear evidence that diabetes education improves
patient outcomes (9799). As part of the
educational plan, the individual with diabetes and his or her domestic companions need to recognize the symptoms of
hypoglycemia and be able to treat a hypoglycemic episode properly with oral carbohydrates or glucagon. Hypoglycemia,
including its risk factors and remediation, should be discussed routinely
with patients receiving treatment with
insulin or sulfonylurea/glinide drugs, especially those with a history of recurrent
hypoglycemia or impaired awareness of
hypoglycemia. In addition, patients
must understand how their medications
work so they can minimize the risk of
hypoglycemia. Care should be taken to

educate patients on the typical pharmacokinetics of these medications. When
evaluating a patients report of hypoglycemia, it is important to adopt interviewing approaches that guide the patient
to a correct identication of the precipitating factors of the episodes of hypoglycemia. Such a heuristic review of
likely factors (skipped or inadequate
meal, unusual exertion, alcohol ingestion, insulin dosage mishaps, etc.)
in the period prior to the event can
deepen the patients appreciation of the
behavioral factors that predispose to
hypoglycemia.
There is convincing evidence that
formal training programs that teach patients to replace insulin physiologically
by giving background and mealtime/
correction doses of insulin can reduce
the risk of severe hypoglycemia. The Insulin Treatment and Training programs
developed by M
uhlhauser and Berger
(100) have reported improved glycemic
control comparable with DCCT while reducing the rates of severe hypoglycemia
(101,102). These programs have been
successfully delivered in other settings
(103,104) with comparable reductions
in hypoglycemic risk (105). Patients
with frequent hypoglycemia may also
benet from enrollment in a blood glucose awareness training program. In
such a program, patients and their relatives are trained to recognize subtle cues
and early neuroglycopenic indicators of
evolving hypoglycemia and respond to
them before the occurrence of disabling
hypoglycemia (106,107).
Dietary intervention
Patients with diabetes need to recognize
which foods contain carbohydrates and
understand how the carbohydrates in
their diet affect blood glucose. To avoid
hypoglycemia, patients on long-acting
secretagogues and xed insulin regimens
must be encouraged to follow a predictable meal plan. Patients on more exible
insulin regimens must know that prandial
insulin injections should be coupled to
meal times. Dissociated meal and insulin
injection patterns lead to wide uctuations
in plasma glucose levels. Patients on
any hypoglycemia-inducing medication
should also be instructed to carry carbohydrates with them at all times to treat
hypoglycemia.
The best bedtime snack to prevent
overnight hypoglycemia in patients with
type 1 diabetes has been investigated
1389
Scientic Statement
without clear consensus (108112).
These conicting reports suggest that
the administration of bedtime snacks
may need to be individualized and be
part of a comprehensive strategy (balanced diet, patient education, optimized
drug regimens, and physical activity
counseling) for the prevention of nocturnal hypoglycemia.
Exercise management
Physical activity increases glucose utilization, which increases the risk of hypoglycemia. The risk factors for exertional
hypoglycemia include prolonged exercise duration, unaccustomed exercise
intensity, and inadequate energy supply
in relation to ambient insulinemia
(113,114). Postexertional hypoglycemia
can be prevented or minimized by careful
glucose monitoring before and after exercise and taking appropriate preemptive
actions. Preexercise snacks should be ingested if blood glucose values indicate
falling glucose levels. Patients with diabetes should carry readily absorbable carbohydrates when embarking on exercise,
including sporadic house or yard work.
Because of the kinetics of rapid-acting
and intermediate-acting insulin, it may
be prudent to empirically adjust insulin
doses on the days of planned exercise, especially in patients with well-controlled
diabetes with a history of exercise-related
hypoglycemia.
Medication adjustment
Hypoglycemic episodes that are not readily explained by conventional factors
(skipped or irregular meals, unaccustomed exercise, alcohol ingestion, etc.)
may be due to excessive doses of drugs
used to treat diabetes. A thorough review
of blood glucose patterns may suggest
vulnerable periods of the day that mandate adjustments to the current antidiabetes regimen. Such adjustments may
include substitution of rapid-acting insulin (lispro, aspart, glulisine) for regular
insulin, or basal insulin glargine or detemir for NPH, to decrease the risk of
hypoglycemia. Continuous subcutaneous
insulin infusion offers great exibility
for adjusting the doses and administration pattern of insulin to counteract
iatrogenic hypoglycemia (115). For patients with type 2 diabetes, sulfonylureas
are the oral agents that pose the greatest
risk for iatrogenic hypoglycemia and
substitution with other classes of oral
agents or even glucagon-like peptide 1
analogs should be considered in the
1390
event of troublesome hypoglycemia

(96). Interestingly, successful transplantation of whole pancreata or isolated
pancreatic islet cells in patients with
type 1 diabetes (116118) results in
marked improvements in glycemic
control and near abolition of iatrogenic
hypoglycemia.
Patients who develop hypoglycemia
unawareness do so because of frequent
and recurrent hypoglycemia. To avoid
such frequent hypoglycemia, adjustments in the treatment regimen that
scrupulously avoid hypoglycemia are
necessary (Table 1). In published studies,
this has required frequent (almost daily)
contact between clinician and patient,
and adjustments to caloric intake and insulin regimen based on blood glucose
values (10,119,120). With this approach, restoration of autonomic symptoms of hypoglycemia occurred within 2
weeks, and complete reversal of hypoglycemia unawareness was achieved by 3
months. In some but not all reports, the
recovery of symptoms is accompanied by
the improvement in epinephrine secretion (32,33,120,121). The return of hypoglycemic symptom awareness was
associated with a modest increase (;0.5%)
in HbA lc values (33), but others have

reported no loss of glycemic control
(32,34).
Glucose monitoring
Glucose monitoring is essential in managing patients at risk for hypoglycemia.
Patients treated with insulin, sulfonylureas, or glinides should check their blood
glucose whenever they develop the symptoms of hypoglycemia in order to conrm
that they must ingest carbohydrates to
treat the symptoms and collect information that can be used by the clinician to
adjust the therapeutic regimen to avoid
future hypoglycemia. Patients on basalbolus insulin therapy should check their
blood glucose before each meal and gure
this value into the calculation of the dose
of rapid-acting insulin to take at that time.
Such care in dosing will likely reduce the
risk of hypoglycemia.
Recent technological developments
have provided patients with new tools
for glucose monitoring. Real-time CGM,
by virtue of its ability to display the
direction and rate of change, provides
helpful information to the wearer leading
to proactive measures to avoid hypoglycemia, e.g., when to think about having a
Table 1dApproach to restore recognition of hypoglycemia in patients with HAAF

Monitoring and goal setting
Encourage SMBG before meals, at bedtime, and during suggestive symptoms
Encourage SMBG between 2 A.M. and 5 A.M. at least three times weekly
Set targets for preprandial blood glucose levels at 100150 mg/dL
Patient education
Educate patients on hypoglycemic symptoms and the role of recurrent hypoglycemia in the
etiology of hypoglycemia unawareness
Reassure patients that hypoglycemia unawareness is reversible through avoidance of
hypoglycemia
Train patients to recognize and respond promptly to early neuroglycopenic symptoms
Dietary intervention
Ensure adequate caloric intake
Recommend interprandial and bedtime snacks
Ensure access to readily absorbable carbohydrates at all times
Consider moderate amounts of xanthine beverages, if tolerated
Exercise counseling
Encourage SMBG before, during, and after exercise
Advise preexercise caloric intake if blood glucose is ,140 mg/dL
Advise consumption of additional calories during and after exercise if blood glucose is ,140
mg/dL
Medication adjustment
Adjust insulin regimen to achieve and maintain target glucose levels
Use rapid-acting insulin analogs (lispro, aspart, glulisine) to decrease the risk of interprandial
hypoglycemia
Use basal insulin analogs (glargine, detemir) to decrease the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia
Consider a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump, as appropriate
Consider a CGM device
Adapted from reference 125.

snack or suspending insulin delivery on a
pump. The CGMs audible and/or vibratory alarms may be particularly helpful in
avoiding severe hypoglycemia at night
and restoring hypoglycemic awareness.
With the low-glucose alarms set at 108
mg/dL, 4 weeks of real-time CGM use restored the epinephrine response and improved adrenergic symptoms during a
hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic clamp
in a small group of adolescents with
type 1 diabetes and hypoglycemic unawareness (122).
The articial pancreas, which couples a
CGM to an insulin pump through sophisticated predictive algorithms, holds out the
promise of completely eliminating hypoglycemia. Several internationally collaborative groups are working on various
approaches to the articial pancreas. The
rst step in this direction is the low-glucose
suspend pump that is available in Europe
and currently in clinical trials in the U.S.
This device shuts off insulin delivery for up
to 2 h once the interstitial glucose concentration reaches a preset threshold and
reduces the duration of nocturnal hypoglycemia (123).
Clinical surveillance
Clinicians and educators must assess the
risk of hypoglycemia at every visit with
patients treated with insulin and insulin
secretagogues. An efcient way to begin
this assessment might be to have the
patient complete the questionnaire
shown in Table 2 while in the waiting
room. Review of the completed questionnaire will help the clinician learn
how often the patient is experiencing
symptomatic and asymptomatic hypoglycemia, ensure the patient is aware of
how to appropriately treat hypoglycemia, and remind both parties of the risks
associated with driving while hypoglycemic. To ensure that hypoglycemia
has been adequately addressed during
a visit, providers may want to use
the Hypoglycemia Provider Checklist
(Table 3).
A careful review of the glucose log
collected by the patient should also be
done at each visit. The date, approximate time, and circumstances surrounding recent episodes of hypoglycemia
should be noted, together with information regarding the awareness of
the warning symptoms of hypoglycemia.
A reliable history of impaired autonomic
responses (tremulousness, sweating, palpitations, and hunger) during hypoglycemia may be the most practical
Table 2dHypoglycemia Patient Questionnaire

Name _____________________________________________________________________
First
Middle
Last
Todays date __________
1. To what extent can you tell by your symptoms that your blood glucose is LOW?
____ Never ____ Rarely ____ Sometimes ____ Often ____ Always
2. In a typical week, how many times will your blood glucose go below 70 mg/dL?
______ a week
3. When your blood glucose goes below 70 mg/dL, what is the usual reason for this?
__________________________________________________________________________
4. How many times have you had a severe hypoglycemic episode (where you needed someones
help and were unable to treat yourself)?
Since the last visit ____ times
In the last year ____ times
5. How many times have you had a moderate hypoglycemic episode (where you could not think
clearly, properly control your body, had to stop what you were doing, but you were still able to
treat yourself)?
In the last year ______ times
6. How often do you carry a snack or glucose tablets (or gel) with you to treat low blood glucose?
Check one of the following:
Never ___ Rarely ___ Sometimes___ Often___ Almost always___
7. How LOW does your blood glucose need to go before you think you should treat it?
Less than ____mg/dL
8. What and how much food or drink do you usually treat low blood glucose with?
__________________________________________________________________________
9. Do you check your blood glucose before driving? Check one of the following:
Yes, always___ Yes, sometimes ___ No___
10. How LOW does your blood glucose need to go before you think you should not drive?
____mg/dL
11. How many times have you had your blood glucose below 70 mg/dL while driving?
In the last year ______ times
12. If you take insulin, do you have a glucagon emergency kit?
Yes___/ No ___
13. Does a spouse, relative, or other person close to you know how to administer glucagon?
Yes___/ No ___
approach to making the diagnosis of

hypoglycemia unawareness. If symptoms
are absent or if frequent episodes of
recurrent hypoglycemia occur within
hours to days of each other, it is likely
that the patient has HAAF. Other historical clues such as experiencing more
than one episode of severe hypoglycemia
that required the assistance of another
over the preceding year or a family re-
port that they are recognizing more

frequent episodes of hypoglycemia may
also provide clues that the patient has
developed hypoglycemia unawareness.
A self-reported history of impaired or
absent perception of autonomic symptoms during hypoglycemia correlates
strongly with laboratory conrmation of hypoglycemia unawareness
(33,121,124,125).
1391
Scientic Statement
Table 3dHypoglycemia Provider Checklist
Name _____________________________________________________________________
First
Middle
Last
Todays date __________
1. __ Reviewed the Hypoglycemia Patient Questionnaire
2. __ Questioned the patient about circumstances surrounding severe or moderate hypoglycemia
3. __ Discussed strategies to avoid hypoglycemia with the patient
4. __ Made medication changes where clinically appropriate
5. __ Recommended carrying snack and/or glucose tablets where appropriate and provided
instructions for how to use them (take 15 g glucose, wait 15 min, and remeasure blood glucose;
repeat if hypoglycemia persists). A 1-page patient handout on treating hypoglycemia is
available at http://clinical.diabetesjournals.org/content/30/1/38
6. __ Prescribed glucagon if appropriate
What are the current

knowledge gaps in our
understanding of
hypoglycemia, and what
research is necessary to ll
these gaps?dSince the publication
of the previous report from the Workgroup on Hypoglycemia in 2005 (1),
much has been learned about the impact
of hypoglycemia on patient outcomes.
However, hypoglycemia continues to
cause considerable morbidity and even
mortality in patients with diabetes. If patients are to benet from the reduction in
microvascular complications that follows
from achieving near-normal levels of glycemia, additional research will be necessary to prevent them from experiencing
hypoglycemia and HAAF. First, new surveillance methods that provide consistent
ways of reporting hypoglycemia must be
developed so that the impact of any intervention to prevent and treat hypoglycemia can be fully assessed. Greater
attention must be focused on understanding which patients are most at risk for
hypoglycemia and on developing new educational strategies that effectively reduce
the number of episodes experienced by
at-risk patients. New therapies that do
not cause hypoglycemia, including an articial pancreas, need to be developed for
both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The technologies used to monitor blood glucose
must become more accurate, more reliable, easier to use, and less expensive.
The mechanisms that render patients unable to increase glucagon secretion in response to hypoglycemia and that are
responsible for the development of
HAAF must be identied so strategies
can be developed to ensure that patients
always experience early warning signs
of impending neuroglycopenia. The impact of hypoglycemia on short-term
1392
outcomes such as mortality and longterm outcomes such as cognitive dysfunction need to be better dened, and
the mechanisms for these associations
need to be understood. Focused research in these priority areas will address
our knowledge gaps about hypoglycemia
and ultimately reduce the impact of iatrogenic hypoglycemia on patients with
diabetes.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
AcknowledgmentsdThe workgroup meeting was supported by educational grants to the
American Diabetes Association from Lilly
USA, LLC and Novo Nordisk and sponsorship
to the American Diabetes Association from
Sano. The sponsors had no input into the
development of or content of the report. No
other potential conicts of interest relevant to
this article were reported.
The workgroup members thank Stephanie
Kutler and Meredith Dyer of The Endocrine
Society and Sue Kirkman, MD, of the American
Diabetes Association for staff support.
References
1. American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia. Dening and
reporting hypoglycemia in diabetes: a report from the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia.
Diabetes Care 2005;28:12451249
2. Cryer PE, Axelrod L, Grossman AB, et al.;
Endocrine Society. Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders:
an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice
Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;
94:709728
3. Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T,
et al.; VADT Investigators. Glucose
control and vascular complications in
veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl
J Med 2009;360:129139
4. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP,
et al.; Action to Control Cardiovascular
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Risk in Diabetes Study Group. Effects of

intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2545
2559
Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J, et al.;
ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2
diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2560
2572
Whitmer RA, Karter AJ, Yaffe K, Quesenberry
CP, Jr, Selby JV. Hypoglycemic episodes
and risk of dementia in older patients
with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2009;
301:15651572
Perantie DC, Lim A, Wu J, et al. Effects of
prior hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia
on cognition in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Diabetes 2008;9:
8795
Perantie DC, Koller JM, Weaver PM,
et al. Prospectively determined impact of
type 1 diabetes on brain volume during
development. Diabetes 2011;60:3006
3014
Amiel SA, Sherwin RS, Simonson DC,
Tamborlane WV. Effect of intensive insulin therapy on glycemic thresholds for
counterregulatory hormone release. Diabetes 1988;37:901907
Dagogo-Jack SE, Craft S, Cryer PE.
Hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Recent antecedent hypoglycemia
reduces autonomic responses to, symptoms of, and defense against subsequent
hypoglycemia. J Clin Invest 1993;91:819
828
Davis SN, Shavers C, Mosqueda-Garcia
R, Costa F. Effects of differing antecedent
hypoglycemia on subsequent counterregulation in normal humans. Diabetes
1997;46:13281335
Heller SR, Cryer PE. Reduced neuroendocrine and symptomatic responses to
subsequent hypoglycemia after 1 episode of hypoglycemia in nondiabetic
humans. Diabetes 1991;40:223226
Boyle PJ, Schwartz NS, Shah SD, Clutter
WE, Cryer PE. Plasma glucose concentrations at the onset of hypoglycemic symptoms in patients with poorly
controlled diabetes and in nondiabetics. N Engl J Med 1988;318:1487
1492
Cryer PE. Preventing hypoglycaemia:
what is the appropriate glucose alert
value? Diabetologia 2009;52:3537
Cryer P. The prevention and correction of
hypoglycemia. In Handbook of Physiology:
Section 7, The Endocrine System, Volume II,
The Endocrine Pancreas and Regulation of
Metabolism. Jefferson LS, Cherring AD,
Eds. New York, Oxford University Press,
2001, p. 10571092
Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N,
et al. System accuracy evaluation of
27 blood glucose monitoring systems
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:221231

Klonoff DC, Buckingham B, Christiansen
JS, et al.; Endocrine Society. Continuous
glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society
Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011;96:29682979
Karon BS, Boyd JC, Klee GG. Glucose
meter performance criteria for tight glycemic control estimated by simulation
modeling. Clin Chem 2010;56:1091
1097
Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick
LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring
of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 1987;10:
622628
Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg
BH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical signicance of inaccuracies
in the measurement of blood glucose.
DexCom Seven Plus Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Users Guide
[article online], 2012. Available from
http://dexcom.com/sites/dexcom.com/
les/seven-plus/docs/SEVEN_Plus_Users_
Guide.pdf and http://dexcom.com/sites/
dexcom.com/les/LBL-011119_Rev_07_
Users_Guide,_G4_US.pdf. Accessed 9
April 2012
Medtronic Guardian Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring System User
Guide [article online], 2012. Available
from
http://www.medtronicdiabetes.
com/support/download-library/userguides. Accessed 29 April 2012
Heller SR, Choudhary P, Davies C, et al.;
UK Hypoglycaemia Study Group. Risk
of hypoglycaemia in types 1 and 2 diabetes: effects of treatment modalities
and their duration. Diabetologia 2007;
50:11401147
Donnelly LA, Morris AD, Frier BM, et al.;
DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. Frequency
and predictors of hypoglycaemia in
Type 1 and insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes: a population-based study. Diabet
Med 2005;22:749755
Cryer PE. The barrier of hypoglycemia in
diabetes. Diabetes 2008;57:31693176
Cryer PE. Death during intensive glycemic therapy of diabetes: mechanisms
and implications. Am J Med 2011;124:
993996
Patterson CC, Dahlquist G, Harjutsalo V,
et al. Early mortality in EURODIAB
population-based cohorts of type 1 diabetes diagnosed in childhood since
1989. Diabetologia 2007;50:24392442
Jacobson AM, Musen G, Ryan CM, et al.;
Diabetes Control and Complications
Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study Research Group. Long-term effect of
diabetes and its treatment on cognitive
function. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1842
1852
29. Feltbower RG, Bodansky HJ, Patterson

CC, et al. Acute complications and drug
misuse are important causes of death for
children and young adults with type 1
diabetes: results from the Yorkshire
Register of Diabetes in Children and
Young Adults. Diabetes Care 2008;31:
922926
30. Skrivarhaug T, Bangstad HJ, Stene LC,
Sandvik L, Hanssen KF, Joner G. Longterm mortality in a nationwide cohort of
childhood-onset type 1 diabetic patients
in Norway. Diabetologia 2006;49:298
305
31. Tanenberg RJ, Newton CA, Drake AJ.
Conrmation of hypoglycemia in the
dead-in-bed syndrome, as captured
by a retrospective continuous glucose
monitoring system. Endocr Pract 2010;
16:244248
32. Cranston I, Lomas J, Maran A, Macdonald
I, Amiel SA. Restoration of hypoglycaemia
awareness in patients with long-duration
insulin-dependent diabetes. Lancet 1994;
344:283287
33. Dagogo-Jack S, Rattarasarn C, Cryer PE.
Reversal of hypoglycemia unawareness,
but not defective glucose counterregulation, in IDDM. Diabetes 1994;43:
14261434
34. Fanelli C, Pampanelli S, Epifano L, et al.
Long-term recovery from unawareness,
decient counterregulation and lack
of cognitive dysfunction during hypoglycaemia, following institution of rational, intensive insulin therapy in IDDM.
Diabetologia 1994;37:12651276
35. White NH, Skor DA, Cryer PE, Levandoski
LA, Bier DM, Santiago JV. Identication
of type I diabetic patients at increased
risk for hypoglycemia during intensive
therapy. N Engl J Med 1983;308:485
491
36. Bolli GB, De Feo P, De Cosmo S, et al. A
reliable and reproducible test for adequate glucose counterregulation in type I
diabetes mellitus. Diabetes 1984;33:
732737
37. Zammitt NN, Warren RE, Deary IJ, Frier
BM. Delayed recovery of cognitive
function following hypoglycemia in
adults with type 1 diabetes: effect of
impaired awareness of hypoglycemia.
Diabetes 2008;57:732736
38. Arbelaez AM, Powers WJ, Videen TO,
Price JL, Cryer PE. Attenuation of
counterregulatory responses to recurrent hypoglycemia by active thalamic
inhibition: a mechanism for hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure. Diabetes 2008;57:470475
39. Jaferi A, Nowak N, Bhatnagar S. Negative
feedback functions in chronically stressed
rats: role of the posterior paraventricular
thalamus. Physiol Behav 2003;78:365
373
40. Puente EC, Silverstein J, Bree AJ, et al.
Recurrent moderate hypoglycemia
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
ameliorates brain damage and cognitive

dysfunction induced by severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes 2010;59:10551062
Reno CM, Tanoli T, Puente EC, et al.
Deaths due to severe hypoglycemia
are exacerbated by diabetes and ameliorated by hypoglycemic pre-conditioning
(Abstract). Diabetes 2011;60(Suppl. 1):
A81
Clarke W, Jones T, Rewers A, Dunger D,
Klingensmith GJ. Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children
and adolescents with diabetes. Pediatr
Diabetes 2009;10(Suppl . 12):134145
Silverstein J, Klingensmith G, Copeland
K, et al.; American Diabetes Association.
Care of children and adolescents with
type 1 diabetes: a statement of the
American Diabetes Association. Diabetes
Care 2005;28:186212
Hannonen R, Tupola S, Ahonen T,
Riikonen R. Neurocognitive functioning
in children with type-1 diabetes with and
without episodes of severe hypoglycaemia. Dev Med Child Neurol 2003;
45:262268
Bolo NR, Musen G, Jacobson AM, et al.
Brain activation during working memory
is altered in patients with type 1 diabetes
during hypoglycemia. Diabetes 2011;60:
32563264
Bonds DE, Miller ME, Bergenstal RM, et al.
The association between symptomatic,
severe hypoglycaemia and mortality in
type 2 diabetes: retrospective epidemiological analysis of the ACCORD study.
BMJ 2010;340:b4909
Zoungas S, Patel A, Chalmers J, et al.;
ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Severe
hypoglycemia and risks of vascular
events and death. N Engl J Med 2010;
363:14101418
Punthakee Z, Miller ME, Launer LJ, et al.;
ACCORD Group of Investigators;
ACCORD-MIND Investigators. Poor cognitive function and risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: post
hoc epidemiologic analysis of the
ACCORD trial. Diabetes Care 2012;35:
787793
Launer LJ, Miller ME, Williamson JD,
et al.; ACCORD MIND Investigators.
Effects of intensive glucose lowering on
brain structure and function in people
with type 2 diabetes (ACCORD MIND):
a randomised open-label substudy.
Lancet Neurol 2011;10:969977
Bertoni AG, Krop JS, Anderson GF,
Brancati FL. Diabetes-related morbidity
and mortality in a national sample of U.S.
elders. Diabetes Care 2002;25:471475
Shorr RI, Ray WA, Daugherty JR, Grifn
MR. Incidence and risk factors for serious hypoglycemia in older persons using
insulin or sulfonylureas. Arch Intern
Med 1997;157:16811686
Heinsimer JA, Lefkowitz RJ. The impact
of aging on adrenergic receptor function:
1393
Scientic Statement
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
1394
clinical and biochemical aspects. J Am

Geriatr Soc 1985;33:184188
Meneilly GS, Cheung E, Tuokko H.
Counterregulatory hormone responses
to hypoglycemia in the elderly patient
with diabetes. Diabetes 1994;43:403
410
Sinclair AJ, Paolisso G, Castro M, BourdelMarchasson I, Gadsby R, Rodriguez
Maas L; European Diabetes Working
Party for Older People. European Diabetes
Working Party for Older People 2011
clinical guidelines for type 2 diabetes
mellitus. Executive summary. Diabetes
Metab 2011;37(Suppl. 3):S27S38
Segel SA, Paramore DS, Cryer PE.
Hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in advanced type 2 diabetes. Diabetes
2002;51:724733
Burge MR, Sobhy TA, Qualls CR,
Schade DS. Effect of short-term glucose
control on glycemic thresholds for epinephrine and hypoglycemic symptoms.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:
54715478
Bruce DG, Casey GP, Grange V, et al.
Cognitive impairment, physical disability and depressive symptoms in older
diabetic patients: the Fremantle Cognition in Diabetes Study. Diabetes Res Clin
Pract 2003;61:5967
Sinclair AJ, Conroy SP, Bayer AJ. Impact
of diabetes on physical function in older
people. Diabetes Care 2008;31:233235
Strachan MWJ, Deary IJ, Ewing FME,
Frier BM. Is type II diabetes associated
with an increased risk of cognitive dysfunction? A critical review of published
studies. Diabetes Care 1997;20:438445
Pandya N, Thompson S, Sambamoorthi
U. The prevalence and persistence of
sliding scale insulin use among newly
admitted elderly nursing home residents
with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Dir
Assoc 2008;9:663669
American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers
Criteria Update Expert Panel. American
Geriatrics Society updated Beers Criteria
for potentially inappropriate medication
use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012;
60:616631
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in
2007. Diabetes Care 2008;31:596615
Aubert RE, Geiss L, Ballard DJ,
Cocanougher B, Herman W. DiabetesRelated Hospitalization and Hospital Utilization. Bethesda, MD, National Institutes
of Health, 1995
Clement S, Braithwaite SS, Magee MF,
et al.; American Diabetes Association
Diabetes in Hospitals Writing Committee. Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals. Diabetes Care
2004;27:553591
Umpierrez GE, Isaacs SD, Bazargan N,
You X, Thaler LM, Kitabchi AE. Hyperglycemia: an independent marker of
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
in-hospital mortality in patients with

undiagnosed diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 2002;87:978982
Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Walther T, et al.
Impact of diabetes mellitus on cardiac
surgery outcome. Thorac Cardiovasc
Surg 2003;51:1116
Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Pathak
P, Gerstein HC. Stress hyperglycemia
and prognosis of stroke in nondiabetic
and diabetic patients: a systematic overview. Stroke 2001;32:24262432
McCowen KC, Malhotra A, Bistrian BR.
Stress-induced hyperglycemia. Crit Care
Clin 2001;17:107124
van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers
F, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in
critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001;
345:13591367
Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, et al.;
German Competence Network Sepsis
(SepNet). Intensive insulin therapy and
pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:125139
Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, et al.;
NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose
control in critically ill patients. N Engl J
Med 2009;360:12831297
Griesdale DE, de Souza RJ, van Dam RM,
et al. Intensive insulin therapy and
mortality among critically ill patients:
a meta-analysis including NICE-SUGAR
study data. CMAJ 2009;180:821827
Van den Berghe G, Wilmer A, Hermans
G, et al. Intensive insulin therapy in the
medical ICU. N Engl J Med 2006;354:
449461
Wiener RS, Wiener DC, Larson RJ.
Benets and risks of tight glucose control
in critically ill adults: a meta-analysis.
JAMA 2008;300:933944
Boucai L, Southern WN, Zonszein J.
Hypoglycemia-associated mortality is not
drug-associated but linked to comorbidities. Am J Med 2011;124:10281035
Krinsley JS, Grover A. Severe hypoglycemia in critically ill patients: risk factors
and outcomes. Crit Care Med 2007;35:
22622267
Turchin A, Matheny ME, Shubina M,
Scanlon JV, Greenwood B, Pendergrass
ML. Hypoglycemia and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes hospitalized in the general ward. Diabetes
Care 2009;32:11531157
Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, et al.;
HAPO Study Cooperative Research
Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse
pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med
2008;358:19912002
Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Rosenn
B, Hod M, Langer O. Diurnal glycemic
prole in obese and normal weight nondiabetic pregnant women. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2004;191:949953
Ringholm L, Pedersen-Bjergaard U,
Thorsteinsson B, Damm P, Mathiesen
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
ER. Hypoglycaemia during pregnancy in

women with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet
Med 2012;29:558566
Mazze R, Yogev Y, Langer O. Measuring
glucose exposure and variability using
continuous glucose monitoring in normal and abnormal glucose metabolism in
pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
2012;25:11711175
Riviello C, Mello G, Jovanovic LG.
Breastfeeding and the basal insulin requirement in type 1 diabetic women.
Endocr Pract 2009;15:187193
Barendse S, Singh H, Frier BM, Speight J.
The impact of hypoglycaemia on quality
of life and related patient-reported outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a narrative review. Diabet Med 2012;29:293302
King P, Kong MF, Parkin H, Macdonald
IA, Tattersall RB. Well-being, cerebral
function, and physical fatigue after nocturnal hypoglycemia in IDDM. Diabetes
Care 1998;21:341345
Gold AE, Deary IJ, Frier BM. Hypoglycaemia and non-cognitive aspects
of psychological function in insulindependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus
(IDDM). Diabet Med 1997;14:111118
Strachan MW, Deary IJ, Ewing FM, Frier
BM. Recovery of cognitive function and
mood after severe hypoglycemia in
adults with insulin-treated diabetes. Diabetes Care 2000;23:305312
Ritholz MD, Jacobson AM. Living with
hypoglycemia. J Gen Intern Med 1998;
13:799804
Davis RE, Morrissey M, Peters JR,
Wittrup-Jensen K, Kennedy-Martin T,
Currie CJ. Impact of hypoglycaemia on
quality of life and productivity in type 1
and type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin
2005;21:14771483
Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick L, Clarke W.
Driving decrements in type I diabetes
during moderate hypoglycemia. Diabetes 1993;42:239243
Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick LA, Kovatchev
BP, Julian DM, Clarke WL. Progressive
hypoglycemias impact on driving simulation performance: occurrence, awareness and correction. Diabetes Care 2000;
23:163170
Quillian WC, Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick
LA, Driesen NR, Clarke WL. Reliability
of driving performance during moderate hypoglycemia in adults with
IDDM. Diabetes Care 1994;17:1367
1368
The DCCT Research Group. Epidemiology of severe hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.
Am J Med 1991;90:450459
Cox DJ, Kovatchev B, Vandecar K, GonderFrederick L, Ritterband L, Clarke W.
Hypoglycemia preceding fatal car collisions. Diabetes Care 2006;29:467468
Eadington DW, Frier BM. Type 1 diabetes and driving experience: an eight-year
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
cohort study. Diabet Med 1989;6:137

141
Lave LB, Songer TJ, LaPorte RE. Should
persons with diabetes be licensed to
drive trucks?dRisk management. Risk
Anal 1993;13:327334
Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB,
et al. Management of hyperglycemia in
type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the
American Diabetes Association (ADA)
and the European Association for the
Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care
2012;35:13641379
Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE,
Williams RD. Group based training for
self-management strategies in people
with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2005;2:CD003417
Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM.
Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH,
Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes:
a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic
control. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1159
1171
M
uhlhauser I, Berger M. Patient educationd
evaluation of a complex intervention. Diabetologia 2002;45:17231733
Bott S, Bott U, Berger M, M
uhlhauser I.
Intensied insulin therapy and the risk
of severe hypoglycaemia. Diabetologia
1997;40:926932
Smann A, M
uhlhauser I, Bender R,
Kloos Ch, M
uller UA. Glycaemic control
and severe hypoglycaemia following
training in exible, intensive insulin
therapy to enable dietary freedom in
people with type 1 diabetes: a prospective implementation study. Diabetologia 2005;48:19651970
DAFNE Study Group. Training in
exible, intensive insulin management
to enable dietary freedom in people
with type 1 diabetes: dose adjustment
for normal eating (DAFNE) randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002;325:
746
McIntyre HD, Knight BA, Harvey DM,
Noud MN, Hagger VL, Gilshenan KS.
Dose adjustment for normal eating
(DAFNE)dan audit of outcomes in
Australia. Med J Aust 2010;192:637
640
Hopkins D, Lawrence I, Mansell P, et al.
Improved biomedical and psychological
outcomes 1 year after structured education
106.
107.
108.
109.
110.
111.
112.
113.
114.
115.
in exible insulin therapy for people with

type 1 diabetes: the U.K. DAFNE experience. Diabetes Care 2012;35:1638
1642
Cox DJ, Gonder-Frederick L, Ritterband
L, Clarke W, Kovatchev BP. Prediction of
severe hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care
2007;30:13701373
Fritsche A, Stefan N, Hring H, Gerich J,
Stumvoll M. Avoidance of hypoglycemia
restores hypoglycemia awareness by increasing beta-adrenergic sensitivity in
type 1 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 2001;
134:729736
Gray RO, Butler PC, Beers TR, Kryshak
EJ, Rizza RA. Comparison of the ability
of bread versus bread plus meat to treat
and prevent subsequent hypoglycemia
in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1996;81:15081511
Kalergis M, Schiffrin A, Gougeon R,
Jones PJ, Yale JF. Impact of bedtime
snack composition on prevention of
nocturnal hypoglycemia in adults with
type 1 diabetes undergoing intensive
insulin management using lispro insulin
before meals: a randomized, placebocontrolled, crossover trial. Diabetes Care
2003;26:915
Kaufman FR, Halvorson M, Kaufman
ND. A randomized, blinded trial of uncooked cornstarch to diminish nocturnal hypoglycemia at diabetes camp.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1995;30:205
209
Raju B, Arbelaez AM, Breckenridge SM,
Cryer PE. Nocturnal hypoglycemia in
type 1 diabetes: an assessment of preventive bedtime treatments. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91:20872092
Ververs MT, Rouw C, Smit GP. Complex carbohydrates in the prevention of
nocturnal hypoglycaemia in diabetic
children. Eur J Clin Nutr 1993;47:268
273
Chipkin SR, Klugh SA, Chasan-Taber L.
Exercise and diabetes. Cardiol Clin
2001;19:489505
Zinman B, Ruderman N, Campaigne BN,
Devlin JT, Schneider SH; American
Diabetes Association. Physical activity/
exercise and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes
Care 2003;26(Suppl. 1):S73S77
Linkeschova R, Raoul M, Bott U, Berger
M, Spraul M. Less severe hypoglycaemia,
better metabolic control, and improved
quality of life in Type 1 diabetes mellitus
with continuous subcutaneous insulin
infusion (CSII) therapy; an observational
study of 100 consecutive patients followed
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
122.
123.
124.
125.
for a mean of 2 years. Diabet Med 2002;

19:746751
Leito CB, Tharavanij T, Cure P, et al.
Restoration of hypoglycemia awareness
after islet transplantation. Diabetes Care
2008;31:21132115
Meyer C, Hering BJ, Grossmann R, et al.
Improved glucose counterregulation
and autonomic symptoms after intraportal islet transplants alone in patients
with long-standing type I diabetes mellitus. Transplantation 1998;66:233
240
Paty BW, Lanz K, Kendall DM, Sutherland
DE, Robertson RP. Restored hypoglycemic counterregulation is stable in successful pancreas transplant recipients for
up to 19 years after transplantation. Transplantation 2001;72:11031107
Amiel SA, Tamborlane WV, Simonson
DC, Sherwin RS. Defective glucose
counterregulation after strict glycemic
control of insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1376
1383
Fanelli CG, Epifano L, Rambotti AM,
et al. Meticulous prevention of hypoglycemia normalizes the glycemic
thresholds and magnitude of most of
neuroendocrine responses to, symptoms
of, and cognitive function during hypoglycemia in intensively treated patients
with short-term IDDM. Diabetes 1993;
42:16831689
Dagogo-Jack S, Fanelli CG, Cryer PE.
Durable reversal of hypoglycemia unawareness in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes
Care 1999;22:866867
Ly TT, Hewitt J, Davey RJ, Lim EM, Davis
EA, Jones TW. Improving epinephrine
responses in hypoglycemia unawareness
with real-time continuous glucose
monitoring in adolescents with type 1
diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:5052
Choudhary P, Shin J, Wang Y, et al. Insulin pump therapy with automated
insulin suspension in response to hypoglycemia: reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia in those at greatest risk.
Smith CB, Choudhary P, Pernet A,
Hopkins D, Amiel SA. Hypoglycemia
unawareness is associated with reduced
adherence to therapeutic decisions in
patients with type 1 diabetes: evidence
from a clinical audit. Diabetes Care 2009;
32:11961198
Dagogo-Jack S. Hypoglycemia in type 1
diabetes mellitus: pathophysiology and
prevention. Treat Endocrinol 2004;3:
91103
1395

Hypoglikemia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hypoglikemia

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Hypoglikemia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

S C I E N T I F I C

Hypoglycemia and Diabetes: A Report

LISA FISH, MD6

n 2005, the American Diabetes Association Workgroup on Hypoglycemia

From the 1Department of Medicine, University of

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, MAY 2013

of Shefeld, Shefeld, U.K.; the 8Diabetes Center,

of Directors in November 2012 and was reviewed

Seaquist and Associates

carbohydrate ingestion include repeating

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, MAY 2013

some individuals, the level that triggers the

On the other hand, HAAF is clearly

Seaquist and Associates

randomly assigned to the intensive arm

patients with type 2 diabetes has also been

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, MAY 2013

without diabetes, and approximately 25%

Seaquist and Associates

hypoglycemia. Care should be taken to

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, MAY 2013

event of troublesome hypoglycemia

in HbA lc values (33), but others have

Table 1dApproach to restore recognition of hypoglycemia in patients with HAAF

Seaquist and Associates

Table 2dHypoglycemia Patient Questionnaire

approach to making the diagnosis of

port that they are recognizing more

What are the current

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, MAY 2013

Risk in Diabetes Study Group. Effects of

Seaquist and Associates

according to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther 2010;12:221231

29. Feltbower RG, Bodansky HJ, Patterson

ameliorates brain damage and cognitive

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, MAY 2013

clinical and biochemical aspects. J Am

in-hospital mortality in patients with

ER. Hypoglycaemia during pregnancy in

Seaquist and Associates

cohort study. Diabet Med 1989;6:137

in exible insulin therapy for people with

for a mean of 2 years. Diabet Med 2002;

DIABETES CARE, VOLUME 36, MAY 2013

You might also like