Welding Research: Failure Investigation of Eddystone Main Steam Piping
Welding Research: Failure Investigation of Eddystone Main Steam Piping
Welding Research: Failure Investigation of Eddystone Main Steam Piping
Readers are advised that all papers published in the Welding Journal's Research Supplement undergo
Peer Review before publication for: 1) originality of the contribution; 2) technical value to the welding
community; 3) prior publication of the material being reviewed; 4) proper credit to others working in the
same area; and 5) justification of the conclusions based on the results.
The names of the more than 160 individuals serving on the AWS Peer Review Panel are published
periodically. All are experts in their respective technical areas, and all are volunteers in the program.
Introduction
The discovery in March 1983 of extenI F. DELONG is senior metallurgical engineer, I.sive cracking in the main steam lines at
E. BYNUM is supervisor, elevated temperature Philadelphia Electric's Eddystone Unit No.
testing, and F. V. ELLIS is principal research
1 power plant led to a forced outage of
engineer with Philadelphia Electric Co., Phila- the plant and the present failure investidelphia, Pa. M. H. RAFIEE is supervisor, metal- gation. This investigation was conducted
lography. CE Metallurgical & Materials Lab,
by Philadelphia Electric Co. (PECO), ComChattanooga, Tenn. W. F. SIDDALL is managbustion Engineering, Inc., and Mitsubishi
er, engineering development, CE Fossil Power
Systems, Windsor, Conn. T. DAIKOKU is man- Heavy Industries, Ltd.
ager, research laboratories, and H. HANEDA is Eddystone Unit No. 1 commenced
manager, boiler development, for Mitsubishi
commercial operation on February 5,
Heavy Industries, Tokyo, lapan.
1960. The plant was designed for turbine
Wt. %
C
Mn
P
S
Si
Ni
Cr
Mo
V
Cb/Ta
Ti
Co
Cu
Al
B
N2
0.035
1.72
0.014
0.020
0.36
12.62
17.10
2.30
0.03
<0.01
<0.01
0.12
0.10
<0.01
<0.001
0.033
a n d indicated a d e q u a t e remaining c r e e p
r u p t u r e life. H e n c e , the unit w a s p e r m i t t e d t o o p e r a t e at n o r m a l conditions. It
w a s w i t h c o m p l e t e surprise that a
t h r o u g h wall leak in t h e m a i n steam
piping system w a s d i s c o v e r e d subseq u e n t t o these tests. T h e failure w a s in a
vertical section o f o n e of the steam lines
a n d w a s n o t w e l d related. T h e safety
p r o b l e m m a n d a t e d that the unit b e
repaired immediately; t h e n e e d t o insure
that t h e p r o b l e m w o u l d n o t recur
All l a b o r a t o r y specimens
reported
here w e r e taken f r o m an 11 ft (3.35 m)
section of t h e 4B steam line containing
the leak p o s i t i o n . The chemical c o m p o s i t i o n of t h e piping is g i v e n in Table 1.
Specimens w e r e also sent b y PECO t o
Failure Analysis Associates (Ref. 2), U n i versity of Pennsylvania (Ref. 3), Sumitom o M e t a l (Ref. 4), General Electric C o .
(Ref. 5), Central Electricity Research Labor a t o r y (Ref. 6), O a k Ridge National Labor a t o r y (Ref. 7), a n d Ishikawajima-Harima
Heavy Industries. Standard light optical
Vh
<
(
Fig. 5 Damage adjacent to main crack consisting of cavities and single grain facet (sgf)
cracks (Unetched)
and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
techniques were used to examine sections of the failed pipe. In addition to the
metallographic
examination,
tensile,
creep, Charpy, and compact tension
tests were performed.
Metallographic Examination
The longitudinal cracking on the outside of the failed pipe is shown in Fig. 1, A
crack nearly through the wall and the
surface appearance of the cracking are
shown in Fig. 2. Figure 3 shows a transverse ring which has three major
cracks.
The damage in all specimens examined
up and form the sgf cracks, which precede the major cracks and subsequent
failure. Figure 7 shows the oriented cavities detected on the outside using a
tangential section rather than the more
common transverse sections. The combination of O D crack initiation and detection of oriented cavitation on tangential
sections led to the use of plastic replica
techniques for field inspection of the
main steam line at the plant.
Examination at higher magnification
revealed that the microstructure of the
failed pipe consists of matrix precipitates
(probably M23Q) and large sigma phase
particles in the grain boundaries.
Although decohesion at the sigmaaustenite interface is cited as a potential
failure mode for this sigma phase morphology, the cavitation found during this
investigation occurs primarily in the ligament region between the sigma phase
particles, as shown in Fig. 8.
It is possible to produce grain boundary fracture in the highly damaged micro-
A?i
I4SEC
air<iNT
tv/ci
o e" "
u.
"
1L
A. J
1it
COAX
f/g. 9 Grain boundary cavities and small par- Fig. 10 EDAX showing high sulfur content of small grain boundary particles
ticles on cavity walls
structure even at room temperature and
relatively slow loading rates. Figure 9
shows multiple cavities on a grain boundary facet produced by room temperature
impact loading of a thin slice taken from
the O D of the failed pipe. The structure
consists of cavity walls (the ridges) and
small particles on the base of the cavities.
The largest particle in the center of the
photograph was analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDAX) and shown
to contain sulfur (Fig. 10the molybdenum peak occurs at nearly the same
energy as sulfur, but is a double, while
the observed peak is symmetrical). At
high magnification, the cavities have the
faceted appearance shown in Fig. 11.
Similar observations have been made by
other investigators (Refs. 2-5). At
present, the interpretation of the source
and role of sulfur in the failure is controversial. Definitive answers to these questions are not provided by this study.
However, based on the work of Yoshihara, Kurahashi and Nii (Ref. 11), it is clear
that (for iron) native sulfur will segregate
at free surfaces (or grain boundaries)
given sufficient aging time.
100X Glyceregia
500X Glyceregia
Fig. 12 Transverse view of fracture face showing cavities with small particles on grain boundary facets
1500X Unetched
I-
z
UJ
Property
DE-1
Specimen Code
DE-2
DE-3
DE-4
44.1
60.0
42.9
47.3
44.1
66.3
Q.
42.8
83.6
10.0
UJ
Q
o
<
Specimen
Location
Test Temperature
( = F)
Absorbed Energy
(ft-lb)
Shear
OD
1/4t
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
77
535
535
535
535
1150
1150
1150
1150
3
4
6
23
4
6
8
24
4
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
99
0
0
0
100
3/4t
ID
OD
1/4t
3/4t
ID
OD
1/4t
3/4t
ID
OD
1/4t
3/4t
ID
9
10
38
5
7
10
36
(%)
>
o
LU
Lateral Expansion
(mils)
I-
UJ
1
3
18
1
4
>
5
21
2
10
15
39
6
7
11
41
Q.
I
UJ
o
rr
<
UJ
</>
UJ
UJ
S
a.
O
-J
steam line w h i c h c o n t a i n e d
several
cracks. T h e specimens w e r e p o s i t i o n e d
so their f r a c t u r e planes a n d t h e crack
planes h a d similar orientations.
Fracture Testing
In o r d e r t o assess the susceptibility of
cracks t o p r o p a g a t e rapidly in the steam
lines, several f r a c t u r e toughness tests
w e r e c o n d u c t e d . C h a r p y i m p a c t specimens a n d 1 in. (25.4 m m ) thick c o m p a c t
tension specimens w e r e cut f r o m the
T h e c o m p a c t tension specimens w e r e
p r e p a r e d a n d tested in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h
UJ
>
X
o
<
UJ
(A
UJ
UJ
S
o.
O
_i
u
>
a
rr
<
UJ
(A
UJ
tr
>
y
' < *.
s
^ ,
yTiT
.i'
' A
H
Z
I >C *
oa.
I
UJ
>
<>
<
UJ
Ui
Fig. 14 Collage of creep specimen from 2B steam line. Specimen fractured at 750C (1382F) and 47 MPa (6.8 ksi)
Specimen
Code
PBB
PBD
PBF
PBE
Test
Temperature
Fracture'3'
Toughness-KQ
(F)
(ksi \/1n7)
76
77
76
270
41.2
38.3
35.8
35.6
(a)
Field Metallography
Technique Development
Field metallography of the steam pipes
was initiated with metallographic examination of the spool piece shown in Fig. 2.
A number of specimens were removed
from this section and metallographicaliy
prepared for microscopic examination, as
described earlier. Der, et al. (Ref. 8) had
developed a repeated polish/etch procedure for the detection of cavities in low
alloy steels. For the TP316 piping, the
specimen remote from the fracture was
experimented with using a repeated polishing/etching technique. After a number
of trials, a suitable combination was
Wt-%
+I
Sodium, as Na
Potassium, as K+1
Lithium, as Li +1
Chloride, as Cl~
Sulfur, as S0 4 " 2
0.032
0.019
0.000
0.014
0.000
Fig. 76 Comparison of microstructure revealed by OD plastic replication and metallographic mount of boat sample for the superheater outlet header.
Left replicating technique; center direct viewing; right transverse view
strated in Fig. 16 for one location. The
other locations from which the boat samples were taken exhibited the same similarity.
Metallography Conclusions
From the tests conducted and the data
collected, it was determined that the
microstructure observed at the surface of
the components was a representative
structure and not merely a surface phenomenon. The material upstream of the
boiler stop valve showed creep damage
when sigma phase was present, and the
material downstream of the boiler stop
valve showed no creep damage, even in
pipe sections which had a blocky sigma
microstructure.
Failure Scenario
At this point in the failure investigation,
we had established the following facts
and observations:
1. Cracking started from the pipe O D
and propagated axially along the pipe
and radially through the wall thickness.
2. Cracks were intergranular.
3. Creep voids had opened in grain
boundaries.
4. No cracks or creep voids were
detected downstream of the boiler stop
valves.
5. Ductility tests showed the outer
two-thirds of the pipe wall to have low
ductility.
6. The pipe showed no evidence of
creep swelling.
7. Chemical analysis of the 316 stainless steel material indicated compliance
with the original requirements of the
specification.
Facts one, t w o and three taken together would indicate the classic case of
creep rupture of a pressurized cylinder
under internal pressure. In order to
accept this failure scenario, one would
have to conclude that: one, the material
2.0
2,42
2.83
3.25
3.67
4.03
4.50
RADIUS(inches)
Fig. 17- Thermal gradient main steam pipe 500F in 5 minutes down-shock transient
CO
LU
cc
tto
Conclusion
Q.
oo
I
to
LU
CC
Results
Figure 17 is a plot of the maximum
temperature gradient induced in the pipe
due to the assumed thermal shock loading. This gradient was approximately
390F (217C). Figure 18 shows the elastic-plastic peak hoop stress distribution
which results from this gradient. A stress
of +28 ksi (193 MPa) was calculated at
the inner bore and - 1 9 . 8 ksi (-136.5
MPa) at the outer diameter. This loading
condition resulted in a plastic strain field
being induced in the cylinder. We calculate 0.15% plastic-strain at the inner bore
and 0.08% at the outer diameter.
Upon removal of the thermal gradient,
the vessel was cooled to room temperature and the pressure removed. Figure 19
plots the room temperature residual
co
Q-
o
o
X
Fig. 19 Main steam pipe residual stress field 100"F, 14.7 psi
BEFORE CREEP
For the Eddystone TP-316 piping, residual stress measurements were first made
in the laboratory on a cylindrical section
from the 4B main steam line. The results
of these measurements, shown in Table
6, indicated ID compressive and O D
tensile hoop stresses were present. From
these results, the decision was made to
Summary
Table 6Laboratory and Field Residual Stress Measurement Results on Philadelphia Electric, Eddystone Unit 1 Headers and Steam Lines
Location
Component
Identification
Max Principal
Stress ksi
Min. Principal
Stress ksi
0 Direction
degrees*3'
Laboratory
Measurements
Pipe ID
Pipe O D
4B Steam Line
4B Steam Line
-8.1
3.1
-14.0
-3.6
166.5
95.2
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Floor
Basement
lA Outlet
4B Outlet
1B Steam
3B Steam
2A Steam
2B Steam
1A Steam
13.7
0.9
17.0
11.5
21.2
30.3
12.5
3.8
-6.6
13.0
8.8
13.6
20.2
-5.2
160.4
14.3
10.1
92.7
170.9
4.0
0.0
(a)
11
11
4
4
1
1
Header
Header
Line
Line
Line
Line
Line
Direction of maximum principal residual stress measured clockwise f r o m rosette gage element l. Element I is axially oriented in all cases.
References
1. Caughey, R. H. and Benz, |r., W. G.
October 1960. Material selection and tabulation, main steam piping for Eddystone No. 1,
1200F and 5000 psi service. ASME, journal of
Engineering tor Power, pp. 293-314.