CFAP FAFR Study Text
CFAP FAFR Study Text
ICAP
Advanced accounting and
financial reporting
Notice
Emile Woolf International has made every effort to ensure that at the time of writing the
contents of this study text are accurate, but neither Emile Woolf International nor its directors
or employees shall be under any liability whatsoever for any inaccurate or misleading
information this work could contain.
ii
C
Contents
Page
Chapter
1
Regulatory framework
25
53
81
103
117
149
173
195
10
213
11
235
12
292
13
323
14
349
15
395
16
457
iii
Page
17
475
18
493
19
535
20
577
21
589
22
607
23
Complex groups
625
24
Disposal of subsidiaries
659
25
687
26
Foreign currency
697
27
729
28
771
29
811
30
853
31
879
32
891
33
933
34
949
35
963
36
977
Index
995
iv
S
Syllabus objective
and learning outcomes
CERTIFIED FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING PROFESSIONAL
ADVANCED ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL REPORTING
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning Outcome
On the successful completion of this paper candidates will be able to:
1
evaluate and analyse financial data in order to arrive at firm decisions on the
accounting treatment and reporting of the same.
exercise professional judgment and act in an ethical manner (that is in the best
interest of society and the profession).
Grid
Weighting
30-35
50- 60
10-15
Total
Contents
A
100
Chapter
2, 3, 25
20
20
22
33
10, 22
23
18, 19, 22
32
32
32
Financial reporting
30
15
18, 19, 21
31
29
vi
Contents
B
Chapter
17
16
2, 16
29
12 IAS 2: Inventories
29
13
11
14
24
17
26
12
16
29
17
vii
Contents
B
Chapter
11
12
12
33
29
14
16
17
17
21
29
11
13
11
29
viii
Contents
B
Chapter
Ethics
35
35
31
Banks
31
Mutual funds
31
Insurance companies
31
31
34
ix
CHAPTER
Regulatory framework
Contents
1 Regulatory framework for accounting in Pakistan
2 Companies Ordinance 1984: Fourth Schedule
3 Companies Ordinance 1984: Fifth Schedule
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
Section 234
Section 234 requires that every balance sheet (statement of financial position)
must give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company as at the end
of its financial year, and every profit and loss account or income and expenditure
account of a company must give a true and fair view of the profit and loss of the
company for the financial year.
All items of expenditure must be recognised in the profit or loss account unless it
may be fairly charged over several years. In such cases the whole amount must
be stated with the reasons why only part is charged against the income of the
financial year.
Other requirements
Assets and liabilities must be classified under headings appropriate to the
company's business.
The period reported on in the accounts is called the financial year.
1.3 Companies Ordinance 1984: Introduction to the fourth and fifth schedules
The Companies Ordinance 1984 contains a series of appendices called
schedules which set out detailed requirements in certain areas.
The fourth schedule to the Companies Ordinance 1984
This schedule sets out the detailed requirements that must be complied with in
respect of the balance sheet and profit and loss account of a listed company. It
also applies to private and non-listed public companies that are a subsidiary of a
listed company.
The schedule specifies that listed companies must follow International Financial
Reporting Standards as notified for this purpose in the Official Gazette.
The fifth schedule to the Companies Ordinance 1984
This schedule applies to the balance sheets and profit and loss accounts of all
other companies.
This schedule defines and applies to public interest companies, medium sized
companies and small sized companies. These categories determine which
accounting standards are followed. The three categories are defined in the next
section.
The requirements of the fifth schedule that apply to other companies are more
complicated. The fifth schedule identifies different classes of companies and then
specifies the standards which must be applied by each class. The classes are as
follows:
Public interest companies which are non-listed companies which are either
x
Medium sized companies which are non-listed companies which are not:
x
Small sized companies which are non-listed companies (other than a nonlisted public company) which have:
x
Criteria
All other companies including foreign companies which do not fall into any of the
above categories must follow Full IFRS as approved and notified by SECP.
The SECP may upon application made to it, grant an exemption to any company
or class of company from compliance with all or any of the requirements of the
standards.
The SECP encourages medium sized companies and small sized companies to
follow IFRS as approved and notified by SECP.
Specific rules apply to companies formed under section 42 of the Companies
Ordinance (associations not for profit) and section 43 of the Companies
Ordinance (companies limited by guarantee). This guidance is not in the syllabus
but IFRS as approved and notified by SECP would apply to many of these
companies.
Any entity that has filed, or is in the process of filing, its financial statements
with the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan.
Any entity in this category must apply IFRS as approved as applicable and
notified in the official gazette by the Securities and Exchange Commission of
Pakistan.
For clarity:
A listed company must follow the fourth schedule and apply IFRS (as
specified and notified by the SECP).
Unlisted public interest companies and large sized companies must follow
the fifth schedule and apply IFRS (as specified and notified by the
SECP).
If there is a conflict between IFRS and any SECP guidance or decision the SECP
view must be applied.
Tier 2: Medium Sized Companies
Any company in this category must apply the IFRS for SMEs as adopted in
Pakistan by council of ICAP and follow the requirements of the fifth schedule.
Tier 3: Small Sized Companies
Any company in this category must apply the Revised Accounting and
Financial Reporting Standards for Small-Sized Entities (a single document
drafted and issued by ICAP) and follow the requirements of the fifth schedule.
The AFRS is not examinable.
Accounting standards
IASs
IFRSs
Interpretations
SICs
IFRICs
Note that many IASs and SICs have been replaced or amended by the IASB
since 2001.
International accounting standards cannot be applied in any country without the
approval of the national regulators in that country. All jurisdictions have some
kind of formal approval process which is followed before IFRS can be applied in
that jurisdiction.
Adoption process for IFRS in Pakistan
The previous sections refer to the approval of IFRS by the SECP and notification
of that approval in the Official Gazette
Adoption of an IFRS involves the following steps:
The ASC refers the matter to the Professional Standards and Technical
Advisory Committee (PSTAC) of ICAP. This committee determines how
the adoption and implementation of the standard can be facilitated. It
considers issues like how long any transition period should be and whether
adoption of the standard would requires changes in regulations.
If the PSTAC identifies the need for changes to regulations it refers the
matter to the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP)
(and/or the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP) for matters affecting banks and
other financial institutions). This process is managed by the Coordination
Committees of ICAP and SECP (SBP).
After the satisfactory resolution of issues the PSTAC and the Council
reconsider the matter of adoption.
Current assets
Share capital and reserves
Non-current liabilities
Current liabilities
Other disclosures
These requirements must be followed in addition to those in IFRS.
vehicles;
office equipment;
intangible:
x
goodwill;
brand names;
computer software;
other investments.
The investments must be shown under the heading long term investments,
indicating separately:
at cost;
held to maturity investments, which are not due to mature within next
twelve months; and
available for sale investments which are not intended to be sold within the
next 12 months.
This section introduces several terms which require further explanation. They are
covered in more detail in certain international accounting. However, the
Companies Ordinance 1984 is in your syllabus and refers to these. Therefore,
they will be explained briefly.
Related parties
A related party is an entity or person with the ability to control the company or
exercise significant influence over the company in making financial and operating
decisions or an entity over which the company has ability to control or exercise
significant influence.
IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures includes a list of related parties and specifies
disclosures.
The equity method
The equity method is a method of accounting where an investment is initially
recognised at cost and the carrying amount is increased or decreased to
recognise the investors share of the profit or loss of the investee after the date of
acquisition.
IAS 28: Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures specifies the use of the
equity method in accounting for associates and joint ventures.
Held to maturity investments
This is a type of asset defined in IAS 39: Financial Instruments: Recognition and
Measurement.
Held to maturity investments are financial assets with fixed or determinable
payments and fixed maturity that an entity has the positive intention and ability to
hold to maturity.
They are measured at amortised cost. The amortised cost of a financial asset is
the amount invested initially plus interest recognised at the effective rate less any
cash received in respect of the asset.
IAS 39 is not in your syllabus.
2013
Rs.
2012
Rs.
237,900
158,750
2013
2012
Rs.
Rs.
197,026
167,952
98,736
28,734
295,762
196,686
(57,862)
(37,936)
237,900
158,750
Loans to employees are interest free loans for the purpose of cars. They
are repayable within 3 years and are secured on the vehicles. The
maximum amount of the loans during the year was Rs. 201,345 (2012:
174,321).
The loan to supplier is an unsecured loan given to the TZ Electric Company
to fund the development of electrical supply infrastructure at our Lahore
depot. The loan is repayable in equal instalments over. Mark-up is charged
at 2% per annum.
10
stores, spare parts and loose tools distinguishing each from the other
where practicable;
the aggregate amount due from related parties with the names of
those related parties.
loans and advances due for repayment within a period of twelve months
from the reporting date showing separately:
x
the aggregate amount due from related parties with the names of
those related parties;
trade deposits and short term prepayments and current account balances
with statutory authorities;
interest accrued;
the aggregate amount due from related parties with the names of
those related parties;
tax refunds due from the Government, showing separately different types of
tax;
Any provision made for a fall in value of any current asset is shown as a
deduction from the gross amount of that asset.
11
Definition
Executive: An employee, other than the chief executive and directors, whose basic
salary exceeds five hundred thousand rupees in a financial year.
2013
Rs.
547,132
2012
Rs.
523,890
2013
2012
Rs.
Rs.
Raw materials
139,950
153,856
Work in progress
178,434
163,433
Finished goods
179,100
162,121
51,962
48,261
549,446
(2,314)
527,671
(3,781)
547,132
523,890
2013
Rs.
493,657
2012
Rs.
472,010
2013
2012
Rs.
Rs.
19,247
15,652
474,410
456,358
10,192
8,763
503,849
480,773
(10,192)
(8,763)
493,657
472,010
The considered good unsecured trade debts include Rs. 47, 438 (2012
Rs. 26,342) from X Limited, a related party.
12
Definition
Capital reserve: A reserve not regarded free for distribution by way of dividend.
(Includes capital redemption reserve, capital repurchase reserve account, share
premium account, profit prior to incorporation).
Revenue reserve: A reserve that is normally regarded as available for distribution.
Authorised share
capital (Ordinary
shares of Rs. 10
each)
Issued subscribed
and paid-up capital
(Ordinary shares of
Rs. 10 each)
Fully paid in cash
Fully paid for
consideration other
than cash
Bonus issue
2013
2012
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
41,800
38,000
2013
2012
2013
2012
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Number of
shares
Number
of shares
50,000
50,000
5,000,000
5,000,000
35,000
35,000
3,500,000
3,500,000
3,000
3,000
300,000
300,000
3,800
nil
380,000
nil
41,800
38,000
4,180,000
3,800,000
13
debentures;
deferred liabilities.
Long term loans must be classified as secured and unsecured, and the following
must be shown separately under each class:
loans from banking companies and other financial institutions, other than
those as specified below;
other loans.
creditors;
murabaha;
accrued liabilities;
advance payments;
others;
provision for taxation, showing separately income tax and other taxes.
14
2013
Rs.
316,715
2012
Rs.
268,803
2013
2012
Rs.
Rs.
Trade creditors
Accrued liabilities
275,102
13,610
228,869
14,599
Advance payments
23,457
22,222
4,546
3,113
316,715
268,803
Others
The turnover (sales) showing the gross sales figure with trade discount and
sales tax as a deduction.
Expenses, classified according to their function under the following subheads (along with additional information on their nature):
x
cost of sales;
distribution cost;
administrative expenses;
finance cost.
15
Other information:
x
If a donation is made and any director or his spouse has interest in the
donee, the company must disclose the names of such directors, their
interest in the donee and the names and address of all donees.
Illustration: Turnover
A disclosure note might look like this.
Profit and loss account (exxtract)
Turnover
2013
Rs.
578,554
2012
Rs.
533,991
2013
2012
Rs.
Rs.
673,669
611,670
Sales tax
(83,839)
(74,566)
Trade discounts
(11,276)
(3,113)
578,554
533,991
Less:
16
fees;
managerial remuneration;
other perquisites and benefits in cash or in kind stating their nature and,
where practicable, their approximate money values; and
the amounts, if material, by which any items shown above are affected by
any change in an accounting policy.
Chief
executive
Rs.000
1,650
Executive
directors
Rs.000
5,478
Executives
Rs.000
11,225
2,000
33,675
6,000
323,280
12,000
Retirement benefits
2,000
4,800
37,900
Housing
8,666
Transport
2,345
6,734
26,778
27,886
56,687
399,958
Fees
Managerial remuneration
Bonus
Number of persons
48
the sale price and the mode of disposal (e.g. by tender or negotiation); and
17
The general nature of any credit facilities available to the company under
any contract (other than trade credit) and not used as at the date of the
balance sheet.
Where any property or asset, acquired with the funds of the company, is not held
in the name of the company, or is not in the possession and control of the
company, this fact must be disclosed together with a description and value of the
property or asset and the person in whose name and possession or control it is.
Note: In the exam, you may be required to make any or all of these disclosures
therefore their knowledge and presentation is expected at this level.
18
Sundry requirements
Fixed assets (non-current assets)
Non-current liabilities
Current liabilities
Contingencies and commitments
Other disclosures
any change in an accounting policy that has a material effect in the current
year or may have a material effect in the subsequent year together with
reasons for the change and the financial effect of the change, if material.
vehicles;
office equipment
19
intangible:
x
goodwill;
brand names;
computer software;
other investments.
A company that is not a small sized company must also disclose investments
under the heading long term investments, indicating separately:
held to maturity investments, which are not due to mature within next
twelve months; and
available for sale investments which are not intended to be sold within the
next 12 months.
market value of listed securities and book value of unlisted securities as per
their latest available financial statements.
Any provision made for bad or doubtful loans and advances is shown as a
deduction under each sub-heading above.
Information on terms and conditions, securities obtained and any other material
information must be disclosed.
stores, spare parts and loose tools distinguishing each from the other
where practicable;
20
the aggregate amount due from related parties with the names of
those related parties (does not apply to small sized companies).
loans and advances due for repayment within a period of twelve months
from the reporting date showing separately:
x
the aggregate amount due from related parties with the names of
those related parties (does not apply to small sized companies);
trade deposits and short term prepayments and current account balances
with statutory authorities;
interest accrued;
the aggregate amount due from related parties with the names of
those related parties (does not apply to small sized companies);
tax refunds due from the Government, showing separately different types of
tax;
Any provision made for a fall in value of any current asset is shown as a
deduction from the gross amount of that asset.
21
debentures;
deferred liabilities.
Long term loans must be classified as secured and unsecured, and the following
must be shown separately under each class:
loans from banking companies and other financial institutions, other than
those as specified below;
other loans.
creditors;
murabaha;
accrued liabilities;
advance payments;
others;
provision for taxation, showing separately income tax and other taxes.
22
The turnover (sales) showing the gross sales figure with trade discount and
sales tax as a deduction.
Expenses, classified according to their function under the following subheads (along with additional information on their nature):
cost of sales;
distribution cost;
administrative expenses;
finance cost.
Other information:
x
23
fees;
managerial remuneration;
other perquisites and benefits in cash or in kind stating their nature and,
where practicable, their approximate money values; and
the amounts, if material, by which any items shown above are affected by
any change in an accounting policy.
The general nature of any credit facilities available to the company under
any contract (other than trade credit) and not used as at the date of the
balance sheet.
Where any property or asset, acquired with the funds of the company, is not held
in the name of the company, or is not in the possession and control of the
company, this fact must be disclosed together with a description and value of the
property or asset and the person in whose name and possession or control it is.
If any loan or advance has been granted on terms softer than those generally
prevalent in trade or any relief allowed in matters of interest, repayment, security
or documentation, details with reasons for this must be disclosed along with the
nature of interest of the company or its directors or other officers.
Note: In the exam, you may be required to make any or all of these disclosures
therefore their knowledge and presentation is expected at this level.
24
CHAPTER
Contents
1
Accounting concepts
Fair presentation
25
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 9
26
27
The IASB has been working closely with FASB (the US standard setter) on a
wide range of projects with the aim of converging IFRS and US GAAP. One of
the projects has had the aim of producing a conceptual framework common to
each GAAP.
The new conceptual framework is being developed on a chapter by chapter
basis. Each chapter is being released as an exposure draft and then, subject to
comments received, released as the final version. To date, two chapters have
been finalised and these replace the sections on The objective of financial
statements and Qualitative characteristics of financial statements from the
original document.
To avoid confusion the IASB has published a new document called The
conceptual framework for financial reporting which includes the new chapters
and those retained from the original framework.
The new document is made up of the following sections:
The original document was known as The Framework. This text will describe the
new document as The Conceptual Framework. Note that the changes are not
fundamental in terms of their impact on IFRS.
28
29
Introduction
Underlying assumption
2.1 Introduction
Financial reports are based on estimates, judgements and models rather than
exact depictions. The Conceptual Framework establishes the concepts that
underlie those estimates, judgements and models.
The Conceptual Framework deals with:
The Conceptual Framework sets out the concepts that underlie the preparation
and presentation of financial statements for external users. Its purpose is:
to assist the IASB in the development of future IFRSs and in its review of
existing IFRSs;
to provide those who are interested in the work of the IASB with information
about its approach to the formulation of IFRSs.
30
General purpose financial reports cannot provide all the information needed
and users also need to consider pertinent information from other sources.
Individual primary users have different information needs. The aim of IFRSs
is to provide information that will meet the needs of the maximum number
of primary users.
Other users
Regulators and members of the public other than investors, lenders and
other creditors may also find general purpose financial reports useful but
these reports are not primarily directed to these groups.
31
In order to make these decisions the users need information to help them
assess the prospects for future net cash inflows to an entity.
In order to assess an entitys prospects for future net cash inflows, users
need information about:
x
Information provided
General purpose financial statements provide information about:
to assess a reporting entitys liquidity and solvency and its needs for
additional financing;
32
33
Introduction
Relevance
Faithful representation
3.1 Introduction
This is covered by chapter 3 of The IASB Conceptual Framework.
Information must have certain characteristics in order for it to be useful for
decision making. The IASB Conceptual Framework describes:
relevance; and
faithful representation
comparability;
verifiability
timeliness; and
understandability
34
3.2 Relevance
Information must be relevant to the decision-making needs of users. Information
is relevant if it can be used for predictive and/or confirmatory purposes.
It has predictive value if it helps users to predict what might happen in the
future.
free from error where there are no errors or omissions in the description
of the phenomenon, and the process used to produce the reported
information has been selected and applied with no errors in the process.
35
Timeliness
This means having information available to decision-makers in time to be capable
of influencing their decisions.
Understandability
Information is made understandable by classifying, characterising and presenting
it in a clear and concise manner.
Financial reports are prepared for users who have a reasonable knowledge of
business and economic activities and who review and analyse the information
diligently.
36
Assets
Liabilities
Equity
Income
Expenses
4.1 Assets
An asset is defined as:
from which future economic benefits are expected to flow to the entity.
37
4.2 Liabilities
A liability is defined as:
Present obligation
A liability is an obligation that already exists. An obligation may be legally
enforceable as a result of a binding contract or a statutory requirement, such as a
legal obligation to pay a supplier for goods purchased.
Obligations may also arise from normal business practice, or a desire to maintain
good customer relations or the desire to act in a fair way. For example, an entity
might undertake to rectify faulty goods for customers, even if these are now
outside their warranty period. This undertaking creates an obligation, even
though it is not legally enforceable by the customers of the entity.
Past transactions or events
A liability arises out of a past transaction or event. For example, a trade payable
arises out of the past purchase of goods or services, and an obligation to repay a
bank loan arises out of past borrowing.
Future outflow of economic resources
The settlement of a liability should result in an outflow of resources that embody
economic benefits. This usually involves the payment of cash or transfer of other
assets. A liability is measured by the value of these resources that will be paid or
transferred.
Some liabilities can be measured only with a substantial amount of estimation.
These may be called provisions.
4.3 Equity
Equity is the residual interest in an entity after the value of all its liabilities has
been deducted from the value of all its assets. It is a balance sheet value of the
entitys net assets. It does not represent in any way the market value of the
equity.
Equity may be sub-classified in the statement of financial position, into share
capital, retained profits and other reserves that represent capital maintenance
adjustments.
4.4 Income
Income is defined as increases in economic benefits during the accounting period
in the form of inflows or enhancements of assets or decreases of liabilities that
result in increases in equity, other than those relating to contributions from equity
participants.
38
Gains represent other items that meet the definition of income. Gains may
be recognised in the statements of profit or loss or in the statement of other
comprehensive income. For example:
x
4.5 Expenses
Expenses are decreases in economic benefits during the accounting period in the
form of outflows or depletions of assets or incurrences of liabilities that result in
decreases in equity, other than those relating to distributions to equity
participants.
Expenses include:
39
Reliability of measurement
The IASB Framework states that an element (asset, liability, equity, income or
expense) should be recognised in the statement of financial position or in profit and
loss (the statement of profit or loss) when it:
Items that fail to meet the criteria for recognition should not be included in the financial
statements. However, some if these items may have to be disclosed as additional
details in a note to the financial statements.
The criteria for recognition are as follows:
It must be probable that the future economic benefit associated with the item will
flow either into or out of the entity.
The item should have a cost or value that can be measured reliably.
40
When economic benefits arise over several accounting periods, and the
association with income can only be decided in broad terms, expenses
should be recognised in profit and loss (the statement of profit or loss) of
each accounting period on the basis of systematic and rational
allocation procedures. For example, depreciation charges for a noncurrent asset are allocated between accounting periods on a systematic
and rational basis, by means of an appropriate depreciation policy and
depreciation method.
41
42
ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS
Section overview
Consistency of presentation
Offsetting
In addition to the accounting concepts in the IASB Framework, some other accounting
concepts are used in financial reporting. These concepts, together with the underlying
assumptions of going concern and accruals, are explained in IAS 1 Presentation of
financial statements.
6.3 Offsetting
IAS 1 states that:
Similarly incomes and expenses should not be offset against each other.
43
Fair value
Historical cost. Assets are measured at the amount of cash paid, or at the
fair value of the consideration given to acquire them. Liabilities are
measured at:
x
Present value. Assets might be measured at the value of the future net
cash inflows that the item is expected to generate, discounted to a present
value. Similarly, a liability might be measured at the discounted present
value of the expected cash outflows that will be made to settle the liability.
Historical cost is the most commonly used measurement basis. However, the
other bases of measurement are often used to modify historical cost. For
example, inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Deferred income is measured at present value. Some non-current assets may be
valued at current value.
The Framework does not favour one measurement base over the others.
44
After its initial recognition at acquisition, a non-current asset may be revalued to its fair value.
Fair value is often approximately the same as current value, but sometimes fair
value and current value can be very different.
Problems with the use of fair value
Fair value is easy to understand and less complicated to apply than value to the
business/current value. Arguably, it is also more reliable than value to the
business, because market value is more easily verified than (for example)
economic value. However, it has some serious disadvantages:
There may not be an active market for some kinds of asset. Where there is
no active market, estimates have to be used and these may not be reliable.
It anticipates sales and profits which may never happen (the entity may
have no plans to sell the asset).
Market values can move up and down quite rapidly. This may distort trends
in the financial statements and make it difficult for users to assess an
entitys performance over time.
A notable example of this problem occurred during 2007 and 2008 with the
collapse of the market for certain types of asset-backed securities (mortgagerelated securities known as CDOs). Many banks, particularly in the US and
Europe, announced huge losses, largely due to the requirement to write down
their investments in these financial instruments to fair value, even though fair
value was difficult to assess.
Despite these problems, it looks increasingly likely that the IASB will require
greater use of fair value in future.
45
= Liabilities
+ Equity
or
Assets
A
Liabilities
Equity
Net assets
Like any other equation, changes on one side of the accounting equation are
matched by changes in the other side. Therefore, Profit or loss for a period can
be calculated from the difference between the opening and closing net assets
after adjusting for any distributions during the period.
Formula: Profit
Change in equity = Closing equity Opening equity
Increase in equity = Profit + capital introduced distributions
Profit = Increase in equity capital introduced + distributions
This shows that the value ascribed to opening equity is crucial in the
measurement of profit.
Financial capital maintenance
With the financial concept of capital maintenance, a profit is not earned during
a period unless the financial value of equity at the end of the period exceeds the
financial value of equity at the beginning of the period (after adjusting for equity
capital raised or distributed).
Historical cost accounting is based on the concept of money financial capital
maintenance. Under this concept, an entity makes a profit when its closing
equity exceeds its opening equity measured as the number of units of currency at
the start of the period. Note that this is a separate issue from asset valuation.
Assets could be revalued during the period but this would have no effect on the
opening capital position.
An alternative view of financial capital maintenance is used in constant
purchasing power accounting. This system is based on the concept of real
financial capital maintenance. Under this concept, an entity makes a profit
when its closing equity exceeds opening equity remeasured to maintain its
purchasing power.
46
This requires the opening equity to be uplifted by the general inflation rate. This is
achieved by a simple double entry.
Illustration: Adjustment to maintain opening equity
Debit
Statement of profit or loss
Credit
Inflation reserve
47
Financial
(real terms)
Physical
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
14,000
14,000
14,000
(10,000)
(10,000)
(10,000)
Inflation adjustment
(inflation rate applied to
opening equity):
5% u Rs.10,000
(500)
10% u Rs.10,000
(1,000)
4,000
Statement of financial
position
Rs.
Net assets
3,500
Rs.
3,000
Rs.
14,000
14,000
14,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
500
1,000
10,000
10,500
11,000
4,000
3,500
3,000
14,000
14,000
14,000
Equity:
Opening equity
Before adjustment
Inflation reserve (see
above)
After adjustment
Retained profit (profit for the
year)
48
49
FAIR PRESENTATION
Section overview
8.1 What is meant by fair presentation (or a true and fair view)?
Financial statements are often described as showing a true and fair view or
presenting fairly the financial position and performance of an entity, and
changes in its financial position. In some countries (for example, the UK) this is
the central requirement of financial reporting.
Under international GAAP (specifically IAS 1) financial statements are required
to present fairly the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the
entity.
The Framework does not deal directly with this issue. However, it does state that
if an entity complies with international accounting standards, and if its financial
information has the desirable qualitative characteristics of information, then its
financial statements should convey what is generally understood as a true and
fair view of such information.
IAS 1 states that: Fair presentation requires the faithful representation of the
effects of transactions, other events and conditions in accordance with the
definitions and recognition criteria for assets, liabilities, income and expenses set
out in the IASB Framework.
The use of the term faithful representation means more than that the amounts in
the financial statements should be materially correct. It implies that information
should present clearly the transactions and other events that it is intended to
represent. To provide a faithful representation, financial information must account
for transactions and other events in a way that reflects their substance and
economic reality (in other words, their true commercial impact) rather than their
legal form. If there is a difference between economic substance and legal form,
the financial information should represent the economic substance.
Faithful representation also implies that the amounts in the financial statements
should be classified and presented, and disclosures made in such a way that
important information is not obscured and users are not misled.
50
An entity should not claim to comply with IFRSs unless it complies with all
the requirements of every applicable Standard.
that management has concluded that the financial statements present fairly
the entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows;
the title of the standard or Interpretation from which the entity has departed,
the nature of the departure, including the treatment that the standard or
Interpretation would require, the reason why that treatment would be
misleading, and the treatment adopted; and
for each period presented, the financial impact of the departure on each
item in the financial statements that would have been reported in complying
with the requirement.
51
52
CHAPTER
Presentation of
financial statements
Contents
1 IAS 1: Presentation of financial statements
2 ED/2014/1: Disclosure initiative
3 IAS 34: Interim financial reporting
4 IAS 24: Related party disclosures
5 IFRS 8: Operating segments
6 IAS 10: Events after the reporting period
53
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
A7
A 10
B (a) 24
54
55
IAS 1 allows an entity to present the two sections in a single statement or in two
separate statements.
IAS 1 provides a list of items that, as a minimum, must be shown on the face of
the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
Additional line items should be presented on the face of the statement of
comprehensive income when it is relevant to an understanding of the entitys
financial performance.
Information to be shown on the face of the statement of comprehensive income (or
the statement of profit or loss, if separate) or in the notes
The following information may be shown either on the face of the statement of
comprehensive income or in a note to the financial statements:
56
Credit
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
57
payments of dividends;
Transactions with owners in their capacity as owners are not gains or losses so
are not shown in the statement of comprehensive income but they do affect
equity. The SOCIE highlights such transactions.
Which policies?
Management must disclose those policies that would assist users in
understanding how transactions, other events and conditions are reflected in the
reported financial performance and financial position.
If an IFRS allows a choice of policy, disclosure of the policy selected is especially
useful.
Some standards specifically require disclosure of particular accounting policies.
For example, IAS 16 requires disclosure of the measurement bases used for
classes of property, plant and equipment.
58
useful lives.
Capital disclosures
An entity must disclose information to enable users to evaluate its objectives,
policies and processes for managing capital.
An entity must disclose the following:
59
Introduction
Materiality
Notes
2.1 Introduction
The objective of this project is to make narrow-focus amendments to IAS 1
Presentation of Financial Statements to address some of the concerns expressed
about existing presentation and disclosure requirements, and to ensure that
entities are able to use judgement when preparing financial statements
The proposed amendments relate to:
2.2 Materiality
The proposed amendments clarify the materiality requirements in IAS 1 and
include an emphasis on the potentially detrimental effect of overwhelming useful
information with immaterial information.
60
IAS 1 requires that an entity should present additional line items, headings and
subtotals in the statement of financial position when such presentation is relevant
to an understanding of the entitys financial position. There is a similar
requirement for the statement of profit or loss.
The ED proposes to add a requirement that when an entity presents subtotals in
accordance with these paragraphs, those subtotals must:
2.4 Notes
IAS 1 contains a requirement that notes must be presented in a systematic
manner.
The ED clarifies that entities have flexibility as to the order in which they present
the notes, but also emphasise that understandability and comparability should be
considered by an entity when deciding that order. The ED proposes to provide
additional guidance which allows the entity to consider:
61
Scope of IAS 34
Form and content of interim financial statements
In the statement that presents the components of profit or loss an entity should
present the basic and diluted EPS for the period.
An entity could provide a full set of financial statements or additional selected
information if it wishes to do so. If it chooses to produce a full set of financial
statements for its interim accounts, the entity must comply with IAS 1.
The interim statements are designed to provide an update on the performance
and position of the entity. It should focus on new activities, events, and
circumstances that have occurred since the previous annual financial statements
were issued. They should not duplicate information that has already been
reported in the past.
62
a statement of financial position at the end of the current interim period and
a comparative balance sheet at the end of the previous financial year.
statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income for the current
interim period and cumulatively for the current financial year to date.
a statement of changes in equity for the current financial year to date, with
a comparative statement for the comparable year-to-date period in the
previous year.
a statement of cash flows cumulatively for the current financial year to date,
with a comparative statement for the comparable year-to-date period in the
previous year.
31st
December
2014
30th June
2015
30th June
2014
-
6 months ending
3 months ending
Note: the profit and loss statement will have four columns.
63
Tax expense
1st
Quarter
2nd
Quarter
3rd
Quarter
4th
Quarter
Annual
total
2,500
2,500
2,500
2,500
10,000
Rs. 10,000 of tax is expected to be payable for the full year on Rs.
40,000 of pre-tax income.
64
Tax expense
1st
Quarter
2nd
Quarter
3rd
Quarter
4th
Quarter
Annual
total
3,000
(1,000)
(1,000)
(1,000)
nil
65
Definitions
Disclosure requirements
There are parties that could enforce transactions on the entity that are not
on an arms length basis.
For example, in a group of companies, an entity might sell goods to its parent or
fellow-subsidiaries on more favourable terms than it would sell to other
customers.
In this situation, the financial performance or financial position reported by the
financial statements would be misleading. In each situation there is a special
relationship between the parties to the business transactions. This is referred to
as a related party relationship.
66
4.3 Definitions
IAS 24 provides a lengthy definition of a related party and also a definition of a
related party transaction.
Related party
Definition: Related party
A related party is a person or entity that is related to the entity that is preparing its
financial statements (the reporting entity).
a)
b)
iii)
ii)
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
The entity and the reporting entity are members of the same group
(which means that each parent, subsidiary and fellow subsidiary is
related to the others).
One entity is an associate or joint venture of the other entity (or an
associate or joint venture of a member of a group of which the other
entity is a member).
Both entities are joint ventures of the same third party.
One entity is a joint venture of a third entity and the other entity is an
associate of the third entity.
The entity is a post-employment benefit plan for the benefit of
employees of either the reporting entity or an entity related to the
reporting entity. If the reporting entity is itself such a plan, the
sponsoring employers are also related to the reporting entity.
The entity is controlled or jointly controlled by a person identified in
(a).
A person identified in (a)(i) has significant influence over the entity or
is a member of the key management personnel of the entity (or of a
parent of the entity).
The entity, or any member of a group of which it is a part, provides
key management personnel services to the reporting entity of to the
parent of the reporting entity.
A parent entity is related to its subsidiary entities (because it controls them) and
its associated entities (because it exerts significant influence over them). Fellow
subsidiaries are also related parties, because they are under the common control
of the parent.
In considering each possible related party relationship the entity must look to the
substance of the arrangement, and not merely its legal form. Although two
entities that have the same individual on their board of directors would not meet
any of the above conditions for a related party, a related party relationship would
nevertheless exist if influence can be shown.
67
Some examples are given by IAS 24 of likely exemptions, where a related party
relationship would usually not exist. However, the substance of the relationship
should always be considered in each case.
Examples of entities that are usually not related parties are:
Two venturers that simply share joint control over a joint venture
Trade unions
Public utilities
Leases
Provision of guarantees
68
W Plc holds a controlling interest in X Ltd and Y Ltd. Z Ltd is a wholly owned
subsidiary of X Ltd.
(b)
Mr Z holds 75% of the voting capital of A Ltd and 40% of the voting capital
of B Ltd.
(c)
H and W (who are husband and wife) are the directors and majority
shareholders of Q Ltd. The company makes purchases from P Ltd, a
company jointly controlled by W and their daughter, D. D is a director of P
Ltd but holds no share in Q Ltd.
Answer
(a)
W Plc
W PLC is related to both X Ltd and Y Ltd (both subsidiaries) because of its
controlling interest.
X Ltd and Y Ltd are related because they are under the common control of
W PLC.
Z Ltd is related to X Ltd because of its subsidiary status.
Z Ltd is also related to W PLC as he is indirectly controlled by W PLC
through W PLCs holding of X Ltd.
(b)
Mr Z
Mr Z is related to A Ltd because of the subsidiary status of A Ltd.
As an associate of Mr Z, B Ltd is also a related party
A Ltd and B Ltd are not related. Although they are both owned by Mr Z,
there is no common control because Mr Z only has a 40% stake in B Ltd.
(c)
Q Ltd
H and W are both related to Q Ltd, because they are key management of
the entity
D could be considered to be close family to H and W, but this is only true if
it can be shown that she is influenced by them in business dealings (and
there is insufficient information in this example to ascertain whether this is
true).
P Ltd is related to Q Ltd as it is jointly controlled by a member of the key
management of Q Ltd. Therefore any business dealings between the two
entities will need to be disclosed.
Where transactions have taken place between the related parties, irrespective of
whether a price was charged, the following should be disclosed:
69
the amount
The above disclosures should be given separately for each of the following
categories of related party:
The parent
Subsidiaries
Associates
Post-employment benefits
Termination benefits
Share-based payments.
Associates
Joint ventures
Sales to
related
parties
Purchases
from related
parties
Amounts
owed by
related
parties
Amounts
owed to
related
parties
Rs. m
57
Rs. m
48
14
Rs. m
12
Rs. m
17
-
Non-trading transactions
Associates
Joint ventures
Loans to
related parties
Rs.m
33
70
Loans from
related parties
Rs.m
11
-
Introduction
Operating segments
5.1 Introduction
Many companies operate in several different industries (or product markets) or
diversify their operations across several geographical locations. A consequence
of diversification is that companies are exposed to different rates of profitability,
different growth prospects and different amounts of risk for each separate
segment of their operations.
Objective of IFRS 8
IFRS 8 requires quoted companies to disclose information about their different
operating segments, in order to allow users of the financial statements to gain a
better understanding of the companys financial position and performance.
Users are able to use the information about the main segments of the companys
operations to carry out ratio analysis, identify trends and make predictions about
the future. Without segment information, good performance in some segments
may hide very poor performance in another segment, and the user of the
financial statements will not see the true position of the company.
Scope of IFRS 8
Segment reporting is required for any entity whose debt or equity is quoted on a
public securities market (stock market) and also entities that are in the process of
becoming quoted. If an entity includes some segment information in the annual
report that doesnt comply with IFRS 8, it cannot call it segmental information.
that engages in business activities from which it earns revenues and incurs
expenses
71
Aggregation of segments
Two or more operating segments may be aggregated into a single operating
segment if they have similar economic characteristics, and the segments are
similar in each of the following respects:
The methods used to distribute their products or provide their services, and
Quantitative thresholds
An entity must report separately information about an operating segment that
meets any of the following quantitative thresholds:
Its reported profit is 10% or more of the greater of the combined profit of all
segments that did not report a loss and the combined reporting loss of all
segments that reported a loss
Its assets are 10% or more of the combined assets of all operating
segments
Reportable segments
An entity must report separately information about each operating segment that:
If the total external revenue reported by operating segments constitutes less than
75% of the entitys total revenue, then additional operating segments must be
identified as reporting segments, even if they do not meet the criteria, until 75%
of revenue is included in reportable segments.
72
Example:
The following information relates to a quoted company with five divisions of
operation:
Division 1
Division 2
Division 3
Division 4
Division 5
Profit
Loss
Rs.m
10
25
Rs.m
Rs.m
Rs.m
Rs.m
Rs.m
40
35
40
110
40
Answer
Since Profit figure is higher, we will take 10% of that amount.
Division 1
Division 2
Division 3
Division 4
Division 5
Profit
Loss
Rs.m
10
25
Rs.m
40
35
40
110
Reportable
segment (results >
Rs. 11m
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
40
110
11
Note: Division 3 is reportable as the loss of Rs. 40m is greater than Rs.
11m (ignoring the sign).
73
Example:
The following information relates to Oakwood, a quoted company with five
divisions of operation:
Wood
sales
Rs.m
Revenue from
external
customers
Inter segment
revenue
Reported profit
Total assets
Furniture
sales
Rs.m
Veneer
sales
Rs.m
Waste
sales
Rs.m
Other
sales
Rs.m
Total
Rs.m
220
256
62
55
57
650
38
48
54
4,900
45
4,100
12
200
9
400
10
600
130
10,200
Which of the business divisions are reportable segments under IFRS 8 Operating
segments?
Answer
IFRS 8 states that a segment is reportable if it meets any of the following criteria:
1.
its internal and external revenue is more than 10% of the total entity internal
and external revenue.
2.
its reported profit is 10% or more of the greater of the combined profit of all
segments that did not report a loss.
3.
its assets are 10% or more of the combined assets of all operating
segments.
From the table above, only the Wood and Furniture department sales have more
than 10% of revenue, assets and profit and meet the requirements for an
operating segment. The other three divisions do not meet the criteria: none of
them pass the 10% test for assets, profit or revenue.
Additionally IFRS 8 states that if total external revenue reported by operating
segments constitutes less than 75% of the entitys revenue then additional
operating segments must be identified as reporting segments, until 75% of
revenue is included in reportable segments
The total external revenue of Wood and Furniture is Rs.476m and the total entity
revenue is Rs.650m, which means that the revenue covered by reporting these
two segments is only 73%. This does not meet the criteria so we must add
another operating segment to be able to report on 75% of revenue. It doesnt
matter that any of the other entities do not meet the original segment criteria.
In this case, we can add on any of the other segments to achieve the 75% target.
If we add in Veneer sales, this gives total sales of Rs.538m, which is 83% of the
sales revenue of Rs.650m. This is satisfactory for the segmental report.
74
Disclosure
IFRS 8 states that an entity must disclose information so that users of the
financial statements can evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business
activities in which it engages and the economic environments in which it
operates.
The information that is to be disclosed is:
Information about the following items if they are specified and included in
the measure of segment profit that is reported to the chief operating
decision maker:
interest revenue
interest expense
Reconciliation of the total of the assets of the other material items to the
entitys corresponding items.
Also, the factors used to identify the entitys reportable segments, including the
basis of organisation, (i.e. whether the entity is organised around different
products and services or geographical area), and the types of products and
service from which the reportable segments derive their income must all be
disclosed.
75
Measurement
IFRS 8 requires that the amount of each segment item reported shall be the
measure reported to the chief operating decision maker for the purposes of
making decisions about allocating resources to the segment and assessing its
performance. This is based on the internal structure of how division of the entity
report their results to the chief operating decision maker. Any adjustments and
eliminations made in preparing an entitys financial statements shall be included
in determining segment results only if they are included in the measure of the
segments results used by the chief operating decision maker.
The minimum amount the entity must disclose is:
Revenue from external customers for each product and service or each
group of similar products and services.
If revenue from any customer is more than 10% of total revenue then it
must be disclosed along with the total of revenues from these customers
and the identity of the segment reporting the revenue.
76
Purpose of IAS 10
Accounting for adjusting events after the reporting period
Dividends
to specify when a company should adjust its financial statements for events
that occur after the end of the reporting period, but before the financial
statements are authorised for issue, and
to specify the disclosures that should be given about events that have
occurred after the end of the reporting period but before the financial
statements were authorised for issue.
IAS 10 also includes a requirement that the financial statements should disclose
when the statements were authorised for issue, and who gave the authorisation.
IAS 10 sets out the following key definitions.
Definitions
Events after the reporting period: Those events, favourable and unfavourable that
occur between the end of the reporting period and the date the financial
statements are authorised for issue.
Adjusting events: Events that provide evidence of conditions that already existed as
at the end of the reporting period.
Non-adjusting events: Events that have occurred due to conditions arising after the
end of the reporting period.
The settlement of a court case after the end of the reporting period,
confirming that the company had a present obligation as at the end of the
reporting period as a consequence of the case.
The receipt of information after the reporting period indicating that an asset
was impaired as at the end of the reporting period.
The discovery of fraud or errors showing that the financial statements are
incorrect.
77
A fall in value of an asset after the end of the reporting period, such as a
large fall in the market value of some investments owned by the company,
between the end of the reporting period and the date the financial
statements are authorised for issue.
The destruction of a major plant by a fire after the end of the reporting
period.
6.4 Dividends
IAS 10 also contains specific provisions about proposed dividends and the going
concern presumption on which financial statements are normally based.
If equity dividends are declared after the reporting period, they should not be
recognised, because they did not exist as an obligation at the end of the reporting
period.
Dividends proposed after the reporting period (but before the financial statements
are approved) should be disclosed in a note to the financial statements, in
accordance with IAS 1.
78
An event leading to a crucial non-current asset falling out of use. This might
cause difficulties in supplying customers and fulfilling contracts.
79
80
CHAPTER
81
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
82
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Section overview
Introduction to IAS 8
Accounting policies
Judgements- IAS8
errors.
83
reflect the economic substance of transactions and other events, and not
merely the legal form;
the requirements and guidance in IFRS dealing with similar and related
issues;
84
The same accounting policies must be applied within each period and from one
period to the next unless a change in accounting policy meets one of the
following criteria. A change in accounting policy is permitted only if the change is:
required by IFRS; or
85
86
(i)
(ii)
(b)
Change due
to IFRS
87
Voluntary
change
9
Disclosure:
Change due
to IFRS
Voluntary
change
Impracticability arguments
88
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
Section overview
Accounting estimates
Changes in accounting estimates
Disclosures
bad debts;
inventory obsolescence;
89
in profit or loss for the period in which the change is made, if the change
affects that period only, or
in profit or loss for the period of change and future periods, if the change
affects both.
90
2.3 Disclosures
The following information must be disclosed:
The fact that the effect in future periods is not disclosed because estimating
it is impracticable (if this is the case).
Answer
Disclosure: Profit after tax
Profit before tax is stated after taking the following into account:
Depreciation
Original Estimate
2016
100,000
change in estimate
50,000
150,000
2015
100,000
100,000
Change in estimate
The estimated economic useful life of the plant and machinery was
changed from 5 years to 4 years. The increase / (decrease) in profits
caused by the change is as follows:
2016
Current years profits:
Future profits:
(50,000)
50,000
91
Answer (continued)
Working
Rs.
500,000
(200,000)
300,000
31st
December 2016
2 years
150,000
150,000
Practice question
92
ERRORS
Section overview
Errors
The correction of prior period errors
3.1 Errors
Errors might happen in preparing financial statements. If they are discovered
quickly, they are corrected before the finalised financial statements are
published. When this happens, the correction of the error is of no significance for
the purpose of financial reporting.
A problem arises, however, when an error is discovered that relates to a prior
accounting period. For example, in preparing the financial statements for Year 3,
an error may be discovered affecting the financial statements for Year 2, or even
Year 1.
Definition: Prior period errors
Prior period errors are omissions from, and misstatements in, the entity's financial
statements for one or more prior periods arising from a failure to use, or misuse of,
reliable information that:
(a)
was available when financial statements for those periods were authorised
for issue; and
(b)
could reasonably be expected to have been obtained and taken into account
in the preparation and presentation of those financial statements.
93
Share
premium
Retained
earnings
Total
Rs.000
Rs.000
Rs.000
Rs.000
500
50
90
640
150
150
500
50
240
790
(100)
(100)
385
385
525
1,075
Balance at 31/12/13
Profit for the year
Balance at 31/12/14
2015
Dividends
Profit for the year
Balance at 31/12/15
500
50
KTC has now discovered an error in its inventory valuation. Inventory was
overstated by Rs. 70,000 at 31 December 2015 and by Rs. 60,000 at 31
December 2014. The rate of tax on profits was 30% in both 2014 and 2015.
The error in 2015 is corrected against the current year profit.
The error in 2014 is corrected against the prior year profit. (Note that the 2014
closing inventory is the opening inventory in 2015 so the 2014 adjustment will
impact both periods statements comprehensive income.
Profit adjustments:
2015
2014
Rs.000
Rs.000
385
150
(70)
(60)
60
Tax at 30%
Adjusted profit
(10)
(60)
18
(7)
(42)
378
108
94
Share
capital
Share
premium
Retained
earnings
Total
Rs.000
Rs.000
Rs.000
Rs.000
Balance at 31/12/13
500
50
90
640
108
108
500
50
198
748
(100)
(100)
378
378
476
1,026
500
50
for each period presented in the financial statements, and to the extent
practicable, the amount of the correction for each financial statement item
and the change to basic and fully diluted earnings per share;
the amount of the correction at the beginning of the earliest prior period in
the statements (typically, the start of the previous year);
IAS 8 therefore requires that a note to the financial statements should disclose
details of the prior year error, and the effect that the correction has had on line
items in the prior year.
95
(60)
Decrease in tax
18
(Decrease) in profit
(42)
Rs.000
(60)
18
(Decrease) in equity
(42)
Practice questions
96
Required:
Correct this error and draft the relevant disclosures for the year ended 31st
December 2016.
Practice question
2015
2014
600,000
650,000
300,000
85,000
25,000
Deferred tax
100,000
120,000
90,000
250,000
80,000
70,000
Assets
Plant
Equity and liabilities
Retained earnings
Draft statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31 December 2016
(extracts)
Retained
earnings
Rs.
Balance: 1 January 2015
(24,600)
49,600
25,000
60,000
85,000
Rs.
80,000
Taxation
40,000
30,400
60,000
49,600
During the year it was discovered that the purchase of plant on 1 January 2013
had been written off as a repair expense, (cost: Rs. 120,000). This error affected
the tax calculations and forms submitted.
The company writes off depreciation at 25% pa straight-line (not reduced for part
of the year). The wear and tear allowed by the tax authorities is the same. The tax
rate has been 30% for the past 8 years.
Required:
Correct this error and draft the relevant disclosures for the year ended
31st December 2016.
97
2016
2015
Original Estimate
100,000
100,000
change in estimate
(30,000)
70,000
100,000
Change in estimate
The estimated residual value of the plant and machinery was changed from nil
to Rs. 90,000.
The increase / (decrease) in profits caused by the change is as follows:
2016
Current years profits:
30,000
Future profits:
60,000
The total effect on profit is an increase in profit of Rs 90 000 (Rs 30 000 in the
current year and Rs 60 000 in future years).
The reason for the net increase in profit owing to the change in estimate is
that the residual value was changed. The residual value increased from Rs 0
to Rs 90 000.
This means that instead of expensing the whole cost of Rs 500 000 as
depreciation over the life of the asset, only Rs 410 000 will now be expensed
as depreciation.
Working
Rs.
500,000
31st
(200,000)
December 2015
300,000
(90,000)
Depreciable amount
210,000
3 years
31st
December 2016
98
70,000
230,000
Solutions
Retained earnings
2016
2015
As previously reported
205,000
42,000
Correction of Errors
(70,000)
135,000
42,000
155,000
93,000
290,000
135,000
2015
(restated)
2016
200,000
245,000
Correction of error
200,000
(100,000)
(45,000)
(82,000)
30,000
145,000
(45,000)
155,000
93,000
Debit
Credit
70,000
30,000
Accumulated depreciation
(52,000)
100,000
Correction of error
During year 2015, depreciation was incorrectly recorded as Rs 70,000
instead of Rs 170,000.
Effect on statement of comprehensive income
2015
Increase in expenses
Depreciation
100,000
(30,000)
70,000
99
Solution (continued)
2015
2014
Decrease in assets
Machines
(100,000)
(30,000)
(70,000)
(100,000)
2015
2014
As previously stated
400,000
500,000
300,000
Adjustment
(100,000)
(100,000)
Restated
300,000
400,000
300,000
As previously stated
360,000
205,000
42,000
Adjustment
(70,000)
(70,000)
Restated
290,000
135,000
42,000
As previously stated
100,000
120,000
100,000
Adjustment
(30,000)
(30,000)
Restated
70,000
90,000
100,000
Retained earnings
Deferred taxation
100
Solution
Retained earnings
2016
2015
As previously reported
25,000
(24,600)
Correction of error
21,000
42,000
46,000
17,400
39,000
28,600
85,000
46,000
2016
2015
(restated)
100,000
80,000
Correction of error
(30,000)
(30,000)
70,000
50,000
(40,000)
9,000
(30,400)
9,000
(31,000)
(21,400)
39,000
28,600
Debit
Plant
Credit
120,000
Accumulated depreciation
90,000
Retained earnings
21,000
Tax payable
9,000
Debit
Depreciation
Credit
30,000
Accumulated depreciation
30,000
2016
Increase in expenses
Depreciation
30,000
(9,000)
21,000
101
Solution (continued)
2015
2014
Increase in assets
Plant (W1)
30,000
60,000
9,000
18,000
21,000
42,000
30,000
60,000
2016
2015
2014
As previously stated
600,000
650,000
300,000
Adjustment (W1)
600,000
30,000
60,000
680,000
360,000
85,000
25,000
(24,600)
21,000
42,000
85,000
46,000
17,400
As previously stated
Adjustment (W2)
250,000
80,000
9,000
70,000
18,000
Restated
250,000
89,000
88,000
Restated
Retained earnings
As previously stated
Adjustment (W2)
Restated
Current taxation
Workings: adjustments
W1: Adjustment to property, plant and equipment by year-e
end
Adjustment add back incorrectly
expensed asset
Adjustment subsequent
depreciation on asset
2015
2014
2013
120,000
120,000
120,000
(90,000)
(60,000)
(30,000
30,000
60,000
90,000
30,000
60,000
90,000
Tax at 30%
(9,000)
(18,000)
(27,000)
21,000
42,000
63,000
102
CHAPTER
103
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
104
Introduction
Core principle and the five step model
1.1 Introduction
The IASB issued IFRS 15: Revenue from contracts with customers in May 2014.
IFRS 15 is the end product of a major joint project between the IASB and the US
Financial Accounting Standards Board and replaces IAS 18, IAS 11, IFRIC 13,
IFRIC 15, IFRIC 18 and SIC 31.
IFRS 15 will have an impact on all entities that enter into contracts with
customers with few exceptions. Entities will need to reassess their revenue
recognition policies and may need to revise them. The timing and amount of
revenue recognised may not change for simple contracts for a single deliverable
but will change for more complex arrangements involving more than one
deliverable.
This standard is effective for annual accounting periods beginning on or after 1
January 2017 but earlier application is allowed.
Summary
IFRS 15:
Applying this core principle involves following a five step model as follows:
Definitions
Revenue is income arising in the course of an entitys ordinary activities..
A customer is a party that has contracted with an entity to obtain goods or
services that are an output of the entitys ordinary activities.
105
the entity can identify the payment terms for the goods and services to be
transferred; and
the contract has commercial substance (i.e. the risk, timing or amount of
the entitys future cash flows is expected to change as a result of the
contract); and
If a customer contract does not meet these criteria, revenue is recognised only
when either:
the contract has been terminated and the consideration received is nonrefundable.
A contract does not exist if each party has an enforceable right to terminate a
wholly unperformed contract without compensating the other party.
Combination of contracts
An entity must combine two or more contracts entered into at or near the same
time with the same customer (or related parties of the customer) and treat them
as a single contract if one or more of the following conditions are present:
106
the goods or services promised in the contracts (or some goods or services
promised in the contracts) are a single performance obligation
Contract modifications
A contract modification is any change in the scope and/or price of a contract
approved by both parties for example changes in design, quantity, timing or
method of performance).
If a scope change is approved but the corresponding price change is not yet
determined, these requirements are applied when the entity has an expectation
that the price modification will be approved.
This requirement interacts with the guidance on determining the transaction
price.
A contract modification must be accounted for as a separate contract when:
b.
a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and
that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer.
At the inception of a contract the entity must assess the goods or services
promised in a contract with a customer and must identify as a performance
obligation each promise to transfer to the customer either:
a series of distinct goods or services that are substantially the same and
that have the same pattern of transfer to the customer (described by
reference to promises satisfied over time, and progress to completion
assessment)
the customer can benefit from the good or service either on its own or
together with other resources that are readily available to the customer; and
107
An aside
When (or as) a performance obligation is satisfied, an entity will recognise as
revenue the amount of the transaction price (excluding estimates of variable
consideration that are constrained) allocated to that performance obligation (step
5))
There are two issues to address:
The amount of the transaction price, including any constraints (step 3))
108
The transaction price is not adjusted for effects of the customers credit risk, but
is adjusted if the entity (e.g. based on its customary business practices) has
created a valid expectation that it will enforce its rights for only a portion of the
contract price.
An entity must consider the effects of all the following factors when determining
the transaction price:
variable consideration;
non-cash consideration;
residual approach.
A transfer occurs when the customer obtains control of the good or service.
The customer has physical possession (exceptions for bill and hold,
consignment sales and repos)
109
The benefits of an asset are the potential cash flows that can be obtained
directly or indirectly from the asset in many ways.
110
Contract costs
Presentation
10,000
15,000
25,000
50,000
Analysis
The commission to sales employees is incremental to obtaining the contract and
should be capitalised as a contract asset.
The external legal fees and the travelling cost are not incremental to obtaining
the contract because they have been incurred regardless of whether X Plc
obtained the contract or not.
An entity may recognise the incremental costs of obtaining a contract as an
expense when incurred if the amortisation period of the asset that the entity
otherwise would have recognised is one year or less.
Costs to fulfil a contract
Costs incurred in fulfilling a contract might be within the scope of another
standard (for example, IAS 2: Inventories, IAS 16: Property, Plant and Equipment
or IAS 38: Intangible Assets). If this is not the case, the costs are recognised as
an asset only if they meet all of the following criteria:
111
the costs generate or enhance resources of the entity that will be used in
satisfying (or in continuing to satisfy) performance obligations in the future;
and
costs that are explicitly chargeable to the customer under the contract; and
other costs that are incurred only because an entity entered into the
contract (e.g. payments to subcontractors).
the costs that relate directly to providing those goods or services and that
have not been recognised as expenses.
112
10,000
18,000
28,000
Analysis
Costs must be recognised in the P&L on the same basis as that used to recognise
revenue.
X Limited recognises revenue on a time basis, therefore 1/5 of the total expected
cost should be recognised = Rs. 5,600 per annum.
10,000
18,000
28,000
Analysis
Costs must be recognised in the P&L on the same basis as that used to recognise
revenue.
X Limited recognises revenue on a time basis. The asset relates to the services
transferred to the customer during the contract term of five years and X Limited
anticipates that the contract will be renewed for two subsequent one-year
periods.
Therefore 1/7 of the total expected cost should be recognised = Rs. 4,000 per
annum.
113
10,000
18,000
28,000
Analysis
Costs must be recognised in the P&L on the same basis as that used to recognise
revenue.
Therefore 60% of the total expected cost should be recognised (Rs. 16,800) at
the end of year 1.
3.2 Presentation
This section explains how contracts are presented in the statement of financial
position. In order to do this it explains the double entries that might result from
the recognition of revenue. The double entries depend on circumstance.
An unconditional right to consideration is presented as a receivable.
The accounting treatment to record the transfer of goods for cash or for an
unconditional promise to be paid consideration is straightforward.
Illustration: Possible double entries on recognition of revenue
Debit
X
X
Cash
Receivable
Revenue
Credit
114
The following entries would be required to reflect the progress of the contract).
Contract progress
28 February: X Limited transfers Product A to Y Limited.
At 28 February
Dr (Rs.)
Receivables
Cr (Rs.)
400
Revenue
400
600
Revenue
600
115
At 28 February
Dr (R
Rs.))
Contract asset
Revenue
400
Cr (R
Rs.))
400
Dr (R
Rs.))
Receivable
1,000
Cr (R
Rs.))
Contract asset
400
Revenue
600
Contract liabilities
A contract might require payment in advance or allow the supplier a right to an
amount of consideration that is unconditional (i.e. a receivable), before it
transfers a good or service to the customer.
In these cases, the supplier presents the contract as a contract liability when the
payment is made or the payment is due (whichever is earlier).
The contract liability is a suppliers obligation to transfer goods or services to a
customer for which it has received consideration (an amount of consideration is
due) from the customer.
Example:: Double entry Recognition of a contract liability
1 January 20X8
X Limited enters into a contract to transfer Products A and B to Y Limited in
exchange for Rs. 1,000.
X Limited can invoice this full amount on 31 January.
Product A is to be delivered on 28 February.
Product B is to be delivered on 31 March.
The promises to transfer Products A and B are identified as separate performance
obligations. Rs.400 is allocated to Product A and Rs.600 to Product B.
Revenue is recognised when control of each product transfers to Y Limited.
The following entries would be required to reflect the progress of the contract
Contract progress
The following accounting entries would be necessary:
At 31 January
Dr (R
Rs.)
Receivable
1,000
Contract liability
28 February: X Limited transfers Product A to Y Limited
At 28 February
Dr (Rs.)
Contract liability
400
Revenue
31 March:: X Limited transfers Product B to Y Limited
31 March
Dr (Rs.)
Contract liability
600
Revenue
116
Cr (R
Rs.)
1,000
Cr (Rs.)
400
Cr (Rs.)
600
CHAPTER
117
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 33
B (a) 48
118
Introduction
Bearer plants
Initial measurement
Elements of cost
Exchange of assets
Subsequent expenditure
1.1 Introduction
Rules on accounting for property, plant and equipment are contained in IAS 16:
Property, plant and equipment.
Scope
IAS 16 does not apply to property, plant and equipment classified as held for sale
in accordance with IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued
operations.
Furthermore, IAS 16 does not apply to:
Definition
Definition: Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are tangible items that:
are held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental
(a)
to others, or for administrative purposes; and
(b)
are expected to be used during more than one period.
Items such as spare parts, stand-by equipment and servicing equipment are
recognised as property, plant and equipment when they meet the above
definition. If this is not the case they are recognised as inventory.
Initial recognition
The cost of an item of property, plant and equipment must be recognised as an
asset if, and only if:
it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow
to the entity; and
119
may be necessary in order that a company obtain the future economic benefits
from its other assets so they do qualify for recognition.
Illustration:
A chemical manufacturer may install new chemical handling processes to comply
with environmental requirements for the production and storage of dangerous
chemicals.
This would be recognised as an asset because without them the company cannot
make and sell chemicals.
120
1
= Rs.4,716,981
(1 0.06)
Debit
Credit
4,716,981
Liability
4,716,981
Rs.4,716,981 @ 6%
Debit
= 283,019
Credit
283,019
Liability
283,019
Rs.
4,716,981
283,019
5,000,000
Cash/bank
(5,000,000)
its purchase price after any trade discount has been deducted, plus any
import taxes or non-refundable sales tax; plus
the directly attributable costs of bringing the asset to the location and
condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended
by management. These directly attributable costs may include:
x
121
When the entity has an obligation to dismantle and remove the asset at the
end of its life, its initial cost should also include an estimate of the costs of
dismantling and removing the asset and restoring the site where it is
located. This will be explained in more detail in chapter 13 which covers
IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets.
The recognition of costs ceases when the asset is ready for use. This is when it
is in the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the
manner intended by management.
Cost of self-constructed assets
The cost of a self-constructed asset is determined using the same principles as
for an acquired asset.
A company might make similar assets for sale in the normal course of business.
The cost of an asset for the company to use itself would normally be the same as
the cost of an asset for sale as measured according to IAS 2: Inventories.
IAS23: Borrowing costs, deals with whether interest costs on borrowing to
finance the construction of a non-current asset should be included in the cost of
the asset. This is covered in the next chapter.
Bearer plants are accounted for in the same way as self-constructed assets
(where constructed is taken to mean cultivated).
Not part of cost
Only those costs necessary to bring an asset to a condition and location where it
is capable of operating in the manner intended by management are recognised.
IAS 16 provides the following list of costs that are not costs of an item of
property, plant and equipment:
the fair value of neither the asset received nor the asset given up is reliably
measurable.
If the acquired item is not measured at fair value it is measured at the carrying
amount of the asset given up.
122
Fair value
The fair value of the asset given up is used to measure the cost of the asset
received unless the fair value of the asset received is more clearly evident.
Fair value may be determinable with reference to comparable market
transactions.
If there are no comparable market transactions fair value is reliably measurable if:
Commercial substance
An exchange transaction has commercial substance if:
the configuration (risk, timing and amount) of the cash flows of the asset
received differs from the configuration of the cash flows of the asset
transferred; or
either of the above differences are significant relative to the fair value of the
assets exchanged.
Definition
Entity-specific value is the present value of the cash flows an entity expects to
arise from the continuing use of an asset and from its disposal at the end of its
useful life or expects to incur when settling a liability.
The configuration (risk, timing and amount) of the cash flows of a sugar
processing line differs from that of an unused plot of land.
b)
Currently the land is not generating a return. This means that the entityspecific value of the portion of the entity's operations affected by the
transaction will change as a result of the exchange.
X Limited must recognise the new asset at Rs. 1,400,000 (the fair value of the
asset given up to pay for the asset).
X Limited would recognise a profit on disposal of the land in the amount of Rs.
400,000 (1,400,000 1,00,000)
123
Debit
Credit
Rs.
Rs.
1,400,000
1,000,000
Land
Statement of profit or loss
400.000
is for a replacement part (provided that the part that it replaces is treated as
an item that has been disposed of).
124
DEPRECIATION
Section overview
Depreciation method
Cost model - Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost less any
accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.
The above choice must be applied consistently. A business cannot carry one
item of property, plant & equipment at cost and revalue a similar item. However, a
business can use different models for different classes of property, plant &
equipment. For example, companies might use the cost model for plant and
equipment but use the revaluation model for property.
Depreciation is an important component of both models. You should be familiar
with the measurement and recognition of depreciation from your previous
studies. This section provides a reminder of the key concepts.
2.2 Depreciation
Depreciation is an expense that matches the cost of a non-current asset to the
benefit earned from its ownership. It is calculated so that a business recognises
the full cost associated with a non-current asset over the entire period that the
asset is used.
Definitions
Depreciation is the systematic allocation of the depreciable amount of an asset
over its useful life.
Depreciable amount is the cost of an asset, or other amount substituted for cost,
less its residual value.
The residual value of an asset is the estimated amount that an entity would
currently obtain from disposal of the asset, after deducting the estimated costs of
disposal, if the asset were already of the age and in the condition expected at the
end of its useful life.
125
Definitions (continued)
Useful life is:
(a)
(b)
Carrying amount is the amount at which an asset is recognised after deducting any
accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Net book value
(NBV) is a term that is often used instead of carrying amount.
Parts of an asset
Each part of an asset that has a cost that is significant in relation to the total cost
of the item must be depreciated separately. This means that the cost of an asset
might be split into several different assets and each depreciated separately.
Illustration: Cost
A company has purchased a new Gulf Stream jet for Rs. 5,500 million.
The company has identified the following cost components and useful lives in
respect of this jet.
Useful lives
Rs. million
Engines
2,000
3 years
Airframe
1,500
10 years
Fuselage
1,500
20 years
500
5 years
Fittings
5,500
Depreciation is charged as an expense in the statement of comprehensive
income each year over the life of the asset unless it relates to an asset being
used to construct another asset. In this case the depreciation is capitalised as
part of the cost of that other asset in accordance with the relevant standard (For
example: IAS 2: Inventories; IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment; IAS 38;
Intangible assets).
126
2.4 Reviews of the remaining useful life and expected residual value
Review of useful life
IAS 16 requires useful lives and residual values to be reviewed at each year-end.
Any change is a change in accounting estimate. The carrying amount (cost minus
accumulated depreciation) of the asset at the date of change is written off over
the (revised) remaining useful life of the asset.
Residual value
The residual value of an item of property, plant and equipment must be reviewed
at least at each financial year end and if expectations differ from previous
estimates the depreciation rate for the current and future periods is adjusted.
A change in the assets residual value is accounted for prospectively as an
adjustment to future depreciation.
127
For example, a companys policy might be to value all its motor vehicles at cost,
but to apply the revaluation model to all its land and buildings.
Revaluation model Issues
The following accounting issues have to be addressed when using the
revaluation model:
Issue
1
What happens to the other side of the entry when the carrying amount of
an asset is changed as a result of a revaluation adjustment?
An asset value may increase or decrease.
What happens in each case?
128
129
Debit
30
Land
Revaluation surplus
Credit
30
Debit
30
Credit
30
CO 1984
IFRS
130
130
30
Revaluation surplus
30
Credit
10
130
130
110
95
116
Debit
30
Credit
30
31 December 2016
Debit
Credit
Revaluation surplus
20
Land (110 130)
20
The fall in value reverses a previously recognised surplus. It is recognised in
revaluation surplus to the extent that it is covered by the surplus.
31 December 2017
Debit
Credit
Revaluation surplus
10
Statement of profit or loss
5
Land (95 110)
15
The fall in value in part reverses a previously recognised surplus. It is recognised
in Revaluation surplus to the extent that it is covered by the surplus. This
reduces the revaluation surplus to zero.
Any amount not covered by the surplus is recognised as an expense in the
statement of profit or loss.
31 December 2018
Debit
Credit
Land (116 95)
21
Statement of profit or loss
5
Revaluation surplus
16
A rise in value that reverses a previously recognised expense is recognised
in the statement of profit or loss to the extent that it reverses the expense.
Any amount above this is recognised in equity.
131
Revaluation
surplus
Statement of
profit or loss
At start
Double entry
100
30
30Cr
31/12/15
5
130
b/f
130
Adjustment
(20)
20Dr
31/12/16
6
110
b/f
Adjustment
110
(15)
10Dr
5Dr
31/12/17
7
95
b/f
Adjustment
95
21
16Cr
5Cr
31/12/18
8
116
Rs.
100
Valuation as at:
31 December 2015
31 December 2016
31 December 2017
130
110
95
31 December 2018
116
Debit
30
30
31 December 2016
Other comprehensive income
Debit
20
Credit
Credit
20
132
Debit
10
Credit
15
Debit
21
Credit
5
16
Land
Other
comprehensive
income
At start
Double entry
100
30
30Cr
31/12/15
5
130
b/f
130
Adjustment
(20)
20Dr
31/12/16
6
110
b/f
Adjustment
110
(15)
10Dr
5Dr
31/12/17
7
95
b/f
Adjustment
95
21
16Cr
5Cr
31/12/18
8
116
Statement of
profit or loss
All later examples will follow only Companies Ordinance 1984. This will also be
the case in the exam where the Companies Ordinance will also be followed.
133
After
Cost
25
u 26/20
32.5
Accumulated depreciation
(5)
u 26/20
(6.5)
Carrying amount
20
u 26/20
26
Journals
Rs. m
Asset
7.5
Accumulated depreciation
1.5
Revaluation surplus
Rs. m
134
Example: Method 2
A building owned by a company is carried at Rs. 20 million (Cost of Rs. 25 million
less accumulated depreciation of Rs. 5 million. The companys policy is to apply
the revaluation model to all of its land and buildings.
A current valuation of this building is now Rs. 26 million.
Step 1
Rs. m
Accumulated depreciation
Rs. m
Asset
Step 2
Asset (Rs. 26 Rs. 20m)
Revaluation surplus
Accumulated depreciation
Revaluation surplus
Before
After
Cost
25
(5)
26
Accumulated depreciation
(5)
Carrying amount
20
26
Example:
An office building was purchased four years ago for Rs.3 million.
The building has been depreciated by Rs. 100,000.
It is now re-valued to Rs.4 million. Show the book-keeping entries to record the
revaluation.
135
Answer
Building account
Opening balance b/f
Revaluation account
Opening balance b/f
Rs.
3,000,000 Accumulated
depreciation
1,100,000 Closing balance c/f
4,100,000
4,000,000
Rs.
100,000
4,000,000
4,100,000
Rs.
100,000 Opening balance b/f
Rs.
100,000
Revaluation surplus
Rs.
Revaluation account
Rs.
1,100,000
(b)
(c)
Answer
Original annual depreciation (for Years 1 3) = Rs.(100,000 10,000)/6 years = Rs.15,000.
Rs.
Cost
Less: Accumulated depreciation at the time
of revaluation (= 3 years x Rs.15,000)
Carrying amount at the time of the
revaluation
Revalued amount of the asset
(45,000)
55,000
120,000
100,000
136
65,000
Revalued amount
Less: depreciation charge in Year 4
Carrying amount at the end of Year 4
85,000
IAS 16 allows (but does not require) the transfer of a revaluation surplus to
retained earnings when the asset to which it relates is derecognised
(realised).
This might happen over several years as the asset is depreciated or at a point in
time when the asset is sold.
Revalued assets being depreciated
Revaluation of an asset causes an increase in the annual depreciation charge.
The difference is known as excess depreciation (or incremental depreciation):
Excess depreciation is the difference between:
Each year a business might make a transfer from the revaluation surplus to the
retained profits equal to the amount of the excess depreciation.
Illustration:
Debit
Revaluation surplus
Credit
Retained earnings
137
Example:
An asset was purchased two years ago at the beginning of Year 1 for Rs. 600,000.
It had an expected life of 10 years and nil residual value.
Annual depreciation is Rs. 60,000 (Rs. 600,000/10 years) in the first two years.
At the end of Year 2 the carrying value of the asset was Rs. 480,000.
After two years it is re-valued to Rs. 640,000.
Double entry: Revaluation
Debit
40
Credit
120
Revaluation surplus
160
Each year the business is allowed to make a transfer between the revaluation
surplus and retained profits:
Double entry: Transfer
Debit
20
Credit
20
80
60
20
138
by sale, or
Disposal can occur at any time, and need not be at the end of the assets
expected useful life.
There is a gain or loss on disposal of the asset, as follows:
Illustration: Gain or loss on disposal
Rs.
X
(X)
Asset at cost
(X)
(X)
139
Accounting policies
A reconciliation between the opening and closing values for gross carrying
amounts and accumulated depreciation, showing:
x
Impairment losses;
The following is an example of how a simple table for tangible non-current assets
may be presented in a note to the financial statements.
Illustration:
Property
Plant and
equipment
Cost
Rs.m
Rs.m
7,200
2,100
9,300
Additions
920
340
1,260
Disposals
(260)
(170)
(430)
Total
Rs.m
7,860
2,270
10,130
800
1,100
1,900
Depreciation expense
120
250
370
Accumulated depreciation
140
Accumulated depreciation on
disposals
(55)
865
1,220
2,085
6,400
1,000
7,400
6,995
1,050
8,045
(130)
(185)
Carrying amount
141
Core inventories
The issue
Decommissioning costs are recognised as part of the initial cost of PPE if an
obligation has been recognised for these costs. This will be the case when the
costs satisfy the IAS 37 recognition criteria.
The provision is measured in accordance with IAS 37 rules. IAS 37 requires that
provisions are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted to reflect the best
estimate of the expected outcome.
The carrying amount of a provision might need to change in order to reflect:
discount rate.
IFRIC 1 gives guidance on the location of the other side of the entry when a
provision is adjusted.
Consensus: Unwinding of a discount
A movement on a provision due to the unwinding of a discount is a finance cost
and must be recognised in the statement of profit or loss. Capitalisation in
accordance with the rules in IAS 23 is not permitted.
142
40 Years
Rs.2,000,000
Discount rate
5%
1 January 2015
Amount recognised for the provision
Asset
Provision
Credit
284,091
Rs.
10,000,000
284,091
10,284,091
143
Debit
Rs.257,102
Provision
Credit
Rs.257,102
Rs.14,205
Provision
Rs.14,205
The company must review the provision in accordance with IAS 37.
The provision was reviewed in accordance with IAS 37 and the following revised
estimates made:
Useful life (from this date)
41 years
Decommission cost at end of useful life
Rs.2,200,000
Discount rate
6%
14,205
(96,514)
201,782
144
298,296
Credit
Rs.96,514
Asset
Rs.96,514
2,000,000
284,091
2,284,091
Provision
Rs.
P&L
Rs.
1 January 2015
Cash
Decommissioning cost
10,000,000
284,091
(284,091)
10,284,091
31st December 2015
Depreciation
Unwinding of the discount
Change due to review of
provision
(257,102)
(14,205)
(96,514)
96,514
9,930,475
201,782
257,102
14,205
145
6.2 IFRIC 20: Stripping costs in the production phase of a surface mine
Background
A company involved in surface mining operations may find it necessary to
remove mine waste materials (overburden) to gain access to mineral ore
deposits. This waste removal activity is known as stripping.
The interpretation describes the period before production begins as the
development phase of the mine. Stripping costs incurred in the development
phase are usually capitalised as part of the depreciable cost of building,
developing and constructing the mine. Those capitalised costs are depreciated or
amortised on a systematic basis, usually by using the units of production method,
once production begins.
Once production begins, a mining company may continue to remove overburden
and to incur stripping costs. The material removed in the production phase will
not necessarily be all waste but will often be a combination of ore and waste.
Therefore, there might be two benefits accruing to the company from the
stripping activity:
IFRIC 20 applies to waste removal costs that are incurred in surface mining
activity during the production phase of the mine. It explains how to account for
these two benefits and how to measure them both initially and subsequently.
Issues
IFRIC 20 addresses the following issues:
it is probable that the future economic benefit (improved access to the ore
body) associated with the stripping activity will flow to the company
the company can identify the component of the ore body for which access
has been improved; and
the costs relating to the stripping activity associated with that component
can be measured reliably.
The stripping activity asset must be accounted for as part of an existing asset
either as an addition to, or as an enhancement of, that asset. Therefore, the
nature of this existing asset will determine whether the stripping activity asset is
classified as tangible or intangible.
146
147
The question is whether core inventory held in an entitys own facilities are
accounted for as inventories or as property, plant and equipment.
Analysis
Arguments supporting the rational for classification as inventory:
Core inventories do not meet the definition of PP&E in IAS 16 because they
are not expected to be used during more than one period.
Core inventories are not held for sale or consumption; instead their
intended use is to ensure that a production facility is operating. Even
though core inventories are ordinarily interchangeable with other
inventories, the characteristics and intended use of a particular part of the
inventories remain the same at each individual reporting date. Thus these
core inventories need to be accounted for separately.
IAS 16 (paragraph 16b) states that the cost of an item of property, plant
and equipment comprises any costs directly attributable to bringing the
asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of
operating in the manner intended by management.
Conclusion
The classification of core inventories should be based on their primary intended
use rather than on their physical form.
Core inventories as described above are primarily held for making a production
facility operational. Thus, they would normally be classified as an element of the
cost of property, plant and equipment.
148
CHAPTER
Non-current assets:
sundry standards
Contents
1 IAS 23: Borrowing costs
2 IAS 20: Accounting for government grants and
disclosure of government assistance
3 IAS 40: Investment property
149
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 23
B (a) 31
B (a) 51
150
Introduction
Period of capitalisation
Disclosures
1.1 Introduction
A company might incur significant interest costs if it has to raise a loan to finance
the purchase or construction of an asset. IAS 23: Borrowing costs defines
borrowing costs and sets guidance on the circumstances under which they are to
be capitalised as part of the cost of qualifying assets.
Definition: Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs are interest and other costs that an entity incurs in connection with
the borrowing of funds.
inventories;
intangible assets.
assets that are ready for their intended use or sale when acquired.
151
9,000,000
Interest capitalised:
Actual interest cost
1,250,000
(780,000)
470,000
9,470,000
152
The capitalisation rate is the weighted average of the borrowing costs applicable
to the borrowings that are outstanding during the period except for borrowings
made specifically for the purpose of obtaining a qualifying asset.
The amount of borrowing costs capitalised cannot exceed the amount of
borrowing costs it incurred during a period.
Example: General borrowings: Capitalisation rate
Sahiwal Construction has three sources of borrowing:
Average loan in the
year (Rs.)
7 year loan
8,000,000
800,000
10 year loan
10,000,000
900,000
5,000,000
900,000
Bank overdraft
The 7 year loan has been specifically raised to fund the building of a
qualifying asset.
A suitable capitalisation rate for other projects is found as follows:
Average loan in the
year (Rs.)
10 year loan
Bank overdraft
10,000,000
900,000
5,000,000
900,000
15,000,000
1,800,000
153
The capitalisation rate is applied from the time expenditure on the asset is
incurred.
Example: General borrowings: Capitalisation rate
Continuing the example above, Sahiwal Construction has incurred the following
expenditure on a project funded from general borrowings for year ended 31
December 2016.
Date incurred:
Amount (R
Rs.)
31st March
1,000,000
31st July
1,200,000
30th October
800,000
1,000,000
90,000
1,200,000
60,000
800,000
16,000
3,166,000
Suspension of capitalisation
Capitalisation of borrowing costs should be suspended if development of the
asset is suspended for an extended period of time.
Cessation of capitalisation
Capitalisation of borrowing costs should cease when the asset is substantially
complete. The costs that have already been capitalised remain as a part of the
assets cost, but no additional borrowing costs may be capitalised.
154
1,012.5
Credit
112.5
1,125
1.4 Disclosures
IAS 23 requires disclosure of the following:
155
Government assistance
Disclosure requirements
Definitions
Grants related to assets are government grants whose primary condition is that
an entity qualifying for them should purchase, construct or otherwise acquire
long-term assets. Subsidiary conditions may also be attached restricting the type
or location of the assets or the periods during which they are to be acquired or
held.
Grants related to income are government grants other than those related to
assets.
156
the entity will comply with any conditions attaching to the grant, and
Once these recognition criteria are met, the grants should be recognised in profit
or loss over the periods necessary to match them with their related costs.
Neither type of grant should be credited directly to shareholders interests in the
statement of financial position. They must be reported on a systematic basis
through the statement of profit or loss (profit or loss).
Grants related to income
For grants related to income, IAS 20 states that an income approach should be
used, and the grant should be taken to income over the periods necessary to
match the grant with the costs that the grant is intended to compensate.
IAS 20 allows two methods of doing this:
Method 1. Include the grant for the period as other income for inclusion in
profit or loss for the period
Method 2. Deduct the grant for the period from the related expense.
157
Current liabilities
Deferred income
Non--current liabilities
Deferred income
31
December
Year 0
31
December
Year 1
31
December
Year 2
20,000
10,000
10,000
31
December
Year 1
31
December
Year 2
(50,000)
20,000
(25,000)
10,000
Method 1
Training costs
Government grant received
Method 2
Training costs (50,000 20,000)
Training costs (25,000 10,000)
30,000
15,000
Method 1. Deduct the grant from the cost of the related asset. The asset is
included in the statement of financial position at cost minus the grant.
Depreciate the net amount over the useful life of the asset.
158
600,000
(60,000)
Carrying amount
540,000
Rs.
60,000
Method 2:
Statement of financial position (extract)
Rs.
1,000,000
Accumulated depreciation
(100,000)
Carrying amount
900,000
Current liabilities
Deferred income
40,000
Non--current liabilities
320,000
Deferred income
At the end of year 1 there would be Rs. 360,000 of the grant left to
recognise in profit in the future at Rs. 40,000 per annum. Rs. 40,000
would be recognised in the next year and is therefore current. The balance
is non-current
Included in statement of profit or loss (extract)
Expense: Depreciation charge (Rs. 1,000,000/10 years)
Income: Government grant (Rs. 400,000/10 years)
159
Rs.
(100,000)
40,000
Practice question
160
Credit
500,000
Deferred income
500,000
100,000
Deferred income
100,000
Year 2
Statement of profit or loss
(reduction of employment cost)
Deferred income
100,000
100,000
The balance on the deferred income account at the end of Year 2 is Rs.
300,000 (Rs. 500,000 Rs. (2 u Rs. 100,000).
The double entry to reflect the repayment is as follows
Debit
Deferred income
Statement of profit or loss
Credit
300,000
200,000
Cash
500,000
161
The cumulative additional depreciation that would have been recognised in profit
or loss to date in the absence of the grant must be recognised immediately in
profit or loss.
Also note that the circumstances giving rise to repayment of the grant might
indicate the possible impairment of the new carrying amount of the asset.
the accounting policy adopted for government grants, including the method
of presentation in the financial statements
162
Definitions
Disclosure requirements
3.1 Definitions
IAS 40: Investment Property, defines and sets out the rules on accounting for
investment properties.
Definition: Investment property
An investment property is property (land or a building, part of a building or both)
held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both.
Investment property differs from other property, which is:
held for sale in the ordinary course of business (which is covered by IAS 2:
Inventories).
the owner; or
land held for long-term capital appreciation rather than for short-term sale in
the ordinary course of business.
land held for a currently undetermined future use. (If an entity has not
determined that it will use the land as owner-occupied property or for shortterm sale in the ordinary course of business,
a building owned by the entity (or held by the entity under a finance lease)
and leased out under one or more operating leases.
a building that is vacant but is held to be leased out under one or more
operating leases.
163
Scope limitation
IAS 40 does not apply to:
biological assets related to agricultural activity (IAS 41: Agriculture and IAS
16: Property, plant and equipment); and
mineral rights and mineral reserves such as oil, natural gas and similar
non-regenerative resources.
2.
164
2.
3.
A Limited could use IAS 17 operating lessee accounting for one property
and IAS 40 investment property accounting for the other.
If it applies IAS 40 it must apply the IAS 40 fair value model to the property and
to all other investment properties that it might hold.
In summary, not all operating leases that would qualify to be investment
properties have to be treated in the same way, but once an operating lease is
treated as an investment property, the fair value model must be used for all
investment properties.
Property leased within a group
In some cases, an entity owns property that is leased to, and occupied by, its
parent or another subsidiary.
165
it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the property will
flow to the entity; and
Measurement at recognition
Investment property should be measured initially at cost plus any directly
attributable expenditure (e.g. legal fees, property transfer taxes and other
transaction costs) incurred to acquire the property.
A property held under an operating lease may be classified as an investment
property. The initial cost of such a property is found by capitalising the operating
lease as if it were a finance lease according to IAS 17 Leases.
The cost of an investment property is not increased by:
The chosen policy must be applied to all the investment property of the entity.
Once a policy has been chosen it cannot be changed unless the change will
result in a more appropriate presentation. IAS 40 states that a change from the
fair value model to the cost model is unlikely to result in a more appropriate
presentation.
166
revalue all its investment property to fair value (open market value) at the
end of each financial year; and
recognise any resulting gain or loss in profit or loss for the period.
167
3.3 Why investment properties are treated differently from other properties
Most properties are held to be used directly or indirectly in the entitys business.
For example, a factory houses plant and equipment which is used to produce
goods for sale. The property is being consumed and it is appropriate to
depreciate it over its useful life.
An investment property is held primarily because it is expected to increase in
value. It generates economic benefits for the entity because it will eventually be
sold at a profit. An investment property also differs from other properties because
it generates revenue and cash flows largely independently of other assets held
by an entity.
The most relevant information about an investment property is its fair value (the
amount for which it could be sold). Depreciation is largely irrelevant. Therefore it
is appropriate to re-measure an investment property to fair value each year and
to recognise gains and losses in profit or loss for the period.
Transfer from/to
Transfer from
investment property to
owner-occupied property
Transfer from owneroccupied property to
investment property
Commenceme
nt of
development
with a view to
sale
Commenceme
nt of an
operating lease
to another
party
Transfer from
investment property to
inventories
Transfer from
inventories to
investment property
168
The amount that would be included in the statement of profit or loss for Year 2 in
respect of this disposal under the cost model is as follows:
Cost model
Sale value
Rs.
1,550,000
Selling costs
(50,000)
1,500,000
(1,004,000)
Gain on disposal
496,000
The amount that would be included in the statement of profit or loss for Year 2 in
respect of this disposal under the fair value model is as follows:
(F
Fair value model
Sale value
Selling costs
Rs.
1,550,000
(50,000)
1,500,000
(1,300,000)
Gain on disposal
200,000
the extent to which the fair value of investment property was based on a
valuation by a qualified, independent valuer with relevant, recent
experience
169
if possible, the range within which the propertys fair value is likely to lie.
additions
depreciation
impairment losses
transfers.
When the cost model is used, the fair value of investment property should also be
disclosed. If the fair value cannot be estimated reliably, the same additional
disclosures should be made as under the fair value model.
170
The amounts could be reflected in the financial statements prepared at the end of Year
1 in accordance with IAS 20 in the following ways:
Method 1:
Statement of financial position
Property, plant and equipment
Cost (500,000 100,000)
Accumulated depreciation
Rs.
400,000
(80,000)
Carrying amount
320,000
Rs.
80,000
Method 2:
Statement of financial position
Rs.
Property, plant and equipment
Cost
500,000
Accumulated depreciation
(100,000)
Carrying amount
400,000
Current liabilities
Deferred income
20,000
Non--current liabilities
60,000
Deferred income
At the end of year 1 there would be Rs. 80,000 of the grant left to recognise
in profit in the future at Rs. 20,000 per annum. Rs. 20,000 would be
recognised in the next year and is therefore current. The balance is noncurrent.
Rs.
Included in statement of profit or loss
Expense: Depreciation charge (Rs. 500,000/5 years)
171
(100,000)
20,000
172
CHAPTER
173
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 57
174
Introduction
Scope of IAS 38
Separate acquisition
Exchange transactions
Granted by government
1.1 Introduction
IAS 38: Intangible assets sets out rules on the recognition, measurement and
disclosure of intangible assets.
IAS 38 establishes similar rules for intangible assets to those set out elsewhere
(mainly in IAS 16) for tangible assets. It was developed from the viewpoint that
an asset is an asset so there should be no real difference in how tangible and
intangible assets are accounted for. However, there is an acknowledgement that
it can be more difficult to identify the existence of an intangible asset so IAS 38
gives broader guidance on how to do this when an intangible asset is acquired
through a variety of means.
IAS 38:
175
In addition the following are also excluded specifically from the scope of IAS 38:
176
Control would usually arise where there are legal rights, for example legal rights
over the use of patents or copyrights. Ownership of legal rights would indicate
control over them. However, legal enforceability is not a necessary condition for
control.
For tangible assets such as property, plant and equipment the asset physically
exists and the company controls it. However, in the case of an intangible asset,
control may be harder to achieve or prove.
Some companies have tried to capitalise intangibles such as the costs of staff
training or customer lists on the basis that they provide access to future
economic benefits. However, these would not be assets as they are not
controlled.
Staff training: Staff training creates skills that could be seen as an asset for
the employer. However, staff could leave their employment at any time,
taking with them the skills they have acquired through training.
market research;
Need to be identifiable
An intangible asset must also be identifiable. Intangibles, by their very nature,
do not physically exist. It is therefore important that this identifiability test is
satisfied.
IAS 38 states that to be identifiable an intangible asset:
must be separable; or
177
Identifiable assets that result from research and development activities (such as
a prototype) are intangible assets because any physical (tangible) element of
those assets is secondary to the knowledge (intangible element) that is the
primary outcome of those activities.
Recognition criteria
An intangible asset must be recognised if (and only if):
purchased separately;
internally generated; or
IAS 38 provides extra guidance on how the recognition criteria are to be applied
and/or how the asset is to be measured in each circumstance.
178
any directly attributable expenditure on preparing the asset for its intended
use. For example:
x
The recognition of costs ceases when the intangible asset is in the condition
necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by
management.
Deferred payments are included at the cash price equivalent and the difference
between this amount and the payments made are treated as interest.
the fair value of neither the asset received nor the asset given up is reliably
measurable.
If the acquired item is not measured at fair value it is measured at the carrying
amount of the asset given up.
Note, that these rules are the same as those described for tangible assets in an
earlier chapter.
179
The nature of intangible assets is such that, in many cases, there are no
additions to such an asset or replacements of part of it.
180
it is not identifiable: or
Recognition prohibited
IAS 38 prohibits the recognition of the following internally-generated intangible
items:
goodwill;
brands;
customer lists.
181
a development phase.
If the research phase cannot be distinguished from the development phase the
expenditure on the project is all treated as that incurred on the research phase.
Research phase
Definition: Research
Research is original and planned investigation undertaken with the prospect of
gaining new scientific or technical knowledge and understanding.
Examples of research activities include:
The construction and operation of a pilot plant that is not large enough for
economic commercial production.
182
The company intends to complete the development of the asset and then
use or sell it.
If any one of these conditions is not met, the development expenditure must be
treated in the same way as research costs and recognised in full as an expense
when it is incurred.
Only expenditure incurred after all the conditions have been met can be
capitalised.
Once such expenditure has been written off as an expense, it cannot
subsequently be reinstated as an intangible asset.
Example: Accounting treatment of development costs
Company Q has undertaken the development of a new product. Total costs to date
have been Rs. 800,000. All of the conditions for recognising the development costs
as an intangible asset have now been met.
However, Rs. 200,000 of the Rs. 800,000 was spent before it became clear that
the project was technically feasible, could be resourced and the developed product
would be saleable and profitable.
Development costs.
The Rs. 200,000 incurred before all of the conditions for recognising the
development costs as an intangible asset were met must be written off as an
expense.
The remaining Rs. 600,000 should be capitalised and recognised as an intangible
asset (development costs).
Initial measurement
The cost of an internally generated intangible asset is the sum of expenditure
incurred from the date when the intangible asset first meets the recognition
criteria for such assets.
Expenditure recognised as an expense in previous annual financial statements or
interim financial reports may not be capitalised.
The cost of an internally generated intangible asset comprises all expenditure
that can be directly attributed, and is necessary to creating, producing, and
preparing the asset for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by
management.
Where applicable cost includes:
183
costs that have previously been expensed, (e.g., during a research phase)
must not be reinstated; and,
training expenditure.
an internet service provider hosting the entitys web site. (This expenditure
is recognised as an expense as and when the services are received).
The operating stage begins once development of a web site has been completed.
During this stage, an entity maintains and enhances the applications,
infrastructure, graphical design and content of the web site.
Consensus
An entitys own web site is an internally generated intangible asset that is subject
to the requirements of IAS 38. It should be recognised as an intangible asset if it
satisfies the IAS 38 recognition criteria.
If a web site is developed solely (or primarily) for promoting and advertising its
own products and services then an entity will not be able to demonstrate how it
will generate probable future economic benefits. All expenditure on developing
such a web site should be recognised as an expense when incurred.
The nature of each activity for which expenditure is incurred (e.g. training
employees and maintaining the web site) and the web sites stage of
development or post development should be evaluated to determine the
appropriate accounting treatment
The best estimate of a web sites useful life should be short.
184
Activities
Accounting treatment
Planning
(This stage is
similar in nature
to the research
phase)
Feasibility studies
Application
and
infrastructure
development*
(This stage is
similar in nature
to the
development
phase)
Graphical
design
development*
See above
Content
development*
See above
Operating
Other
* These will be capitalised only when the purpose of building a website is solely
promotion of the business (marketing purpose).
185
Recognition guidance
Cost guidance
186
Non-competition agreements
Customer lists;
Television programmes
Construction permits;
Franchise agreements
187
However, the acquirer would recognise the in-process research and development
as an asset in the consolidated financial statements as long as it:
188
Choice of policy
Revaluation model
Class of assets
The same model should be applied to all assets in the same class. A class of
intangible assets is a grouping of assets of a similar nature and use in an entitys
operations. Examples of separate classes may include:
brand names;
computer software;
Cost model
An intangible asset is carried at its cost less any accumulated amortisation and
any accumulated impairment losses after initial recognition.
189
(b)
willing buyers and sellers can normally be found at any time; and
(c)
Active markets for intangible assets are rare. Very few companies revalue
intangible assets in practice.
The requirement that intangible assets can only be revalued with reference to an
active market is a key difference between the IAS 16 revaluation rules for
property, plant and equipment and the IAS 38 revaluation rules for intangible
assets.
An active market for an intangible asset might disappear. If the fair value of a
revalued intangible asset can no longer be measured by reference to an active
market the carrying amount of the asset going forward is its revalued amount at
the date of the last revaluation less any subsequent accumulated amortisation
and impairment losses.
Frequency of revaluations
Revaluations must be made with sufficient regularity so that the carrying amount
does not differ materially from its fair value at the reporting date.
The frequency of revaluations should depend on the volatility in the value of the
assets concerned. When the value of assets is subject to significant changes
(high volatility), annual revaluations may be necessary.
However, such frequent revaluations are unnecessary for items subject to only
insignificant changes in fair value. In such cases it may be necessary to revalue
the item only every three or five years.
Changing the carrying amount of the asset
When an intangible asset is revalued, any accumulated amortisation at the date
of the revaluation is treated in one of the following ways:
Method 1: Restate accumulated amortisation proportionately with the change in
the gross carrying amount of the asset so that the carrying amount of the asset
after revaluation equals its revalued amount.
Method 2:
Step 2: Change the balance on the asset account to the revalued amount.
190
However:
Downward
revaluations
However:
Each year a business might make a transfer from the revaluation surplus to the
retained profits equal to the amount of the excess amortisation.
finite: or
indefinite.
If the useful life of an intangible asset is assessed as being finite the company
must assess its useful life.
An intangible asset is assessed as having an indefinite useful life when (based
on an analysis of all of the relevant factors) there is no foreseeable limit to the
period over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows.
191
it is probable that such a market will exist at the end of the asset's
useful life.
The amortisation period and the amortisation method must be reviewed at least
at each financial year-end.
Where there is a change in the useful life, the carrying amount (cost minus
accumulated amortisation) of the asset at the date of change is written off
over the (revised) remaining useful life of the asset.
impairment reviews should be carried out annually (or even more frequently
if there are any indications of impairment).
The useful life of an intangible asset that is not being amortised must be
reviewed each period to determine whether events and circumstances continue
to support an indefinite useful life assessment for that asset.
If they do not, the change in the useful life assessment from indefinite to finite is
accounted for as a change in an accounting estimate in accordance with IAS 8.
This means that the carrying amount at the date of the change is amortised over
the estimated useful life from that date.
192
193
DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS
Section overview
Disclosure requirements
Accounting policies
If the useful lives are finite, the useful lives or amortisation rates used.
If the useful lives are indefinite, the carrying amount of the asset and the
reasons supporting the assessment that the asset has an indefinite useful
life.
a description
The total amount of research and development expenditure written off (as
an expense) during the period must also be disclosed.
194
CHAPTER
Contents
1 Impairment of assets
2 Cash generating units
3 Other issues
195
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 39
196
IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS
Section overview
biological assets related to agricultural activity within the scope of IAS 41:
Agriculture that are measured at fair value less costs to sell;
197
198
Internal sources
If either of these amounts is higher than the carrying value of the asset, there has
been no impairment.
IAS 36 sets out the requirements for measuring fair value less costs of disposal
and value in use.
Measuring fair value less costs of disposal
Fair value is normally market value. If no active market exists, it may be possible
to estimate the amount that the entity could obtain from the disposal.
Direct selling costs normally include legal costs, taxes and costs necessary to
bring the asset into a condition to be sold. However, redundancy and similar
199
cash outflows that will be necessarily incurred to generate the cash inflows
from continuing use of the asset; and
Also note that future cash flows are estimated for the asset in its current
condition. Therefore, any estimate of future cash flows should not include
estimated future cash flows that are expected to arise from:
The discount rate must be a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments
of:
the risks specific to the asset for which the future cash flow estimates have
not been adjusted.
However, both the expected future cash flows and the discount rate might be
adjusted to allow for uncertainty about the future such as the business risk
associated with the asset and expectations of possible variations in the amount
or timing of expected future cash benefits from using the asset.
200
Rs.
Fair value
240,000
Costs of disposal
(5,000)
235,000
Year
Discount factor
150,000
1/1.1
Present
value
136,364
100,000
1/1.12
82,645
50,000 + 25,000
1/1.13
56,349
275,358
The recoverable amount is the higher of Rs. 235,000 and Rs. 275,358,
i.e. Rs. 275,358.
The asset must be valued at the lower of carrying value and recoverable
amount.
The asset has a carrying value of Rs. 300,000, which is higher than the
recoverable amount from using the asset.
It must therefore be written down to the recoverable amount, and an
impairment of Rs. 24,642 (Rs. 300,000 Rs. 275,358) must be
recognised.
201
Credit
24,642
24,642
Practice question
b)
c)
202
Credit
4,642
20,000
24,642
Following the recognition of the impairment, the future depreciation of the asset
must be based on the revised carrying amount, minus the residual value, over
the remaining useful life.
Practice question
b)
c)
d)
203
At the end of each reporting period, the entity should assess whether there
are any indications that an asset may be impaired.
(2)
If there are such indications, the entity should estimate the assets
recoverable amount.
(3)
When the recoverable amount is less than the carrying value of the asset,
the entity should reduce the assets carrying value to its recoverable
amount. The amount by which the value of the asset is written down is an
impairment loss.
(4)
(5)
(6)
204
Cash-generating units
Then carry out an impairment review for the entity as a whole, including the
goodwill.
However, the carrying amount of an asset cannot be reduced below the highest
of:
205
zero.
90
10
60
160
The recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit has been assessed as Rs.
140 million.
The impairment loss would be allocated across the assets of the cash-generating
unit as follows:
There is a total impairment loss of Rs. 20 million (= Rs. 160m Rs. 140m). Of
this, Rs. 10 million is allocated to goodwill, to write down the goodwill to Rs. 0.
The remaining Rs. 10 million is then allocated to the other assets pro-rata.
Therefore:
Rs. 6 million (= Rs. 10m 90/150) of the impairment loss is allocated to
property, plant and equipment, and
Rs. 4 million (= Rs. 10m 60/150) of the loss is allocated to the other assets
in the unit.
The allocation has the following result:
206
Before
loss
Rs. m
Impairment
loss
Rs. m
After
loss
Rs. m
90
10
60
(6)
(10)
(4)
84
56
160
(20)
140
OTHER ISSUES
Section overview
should not lead to a carrying amount in excess of what the carrying amount
of the asset would have been without the recognition of the original
impairment loss.
the carrying amount that would have been determined (net of amortisation
or depreciation) had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset in
prior periods.
Depreciation charges for future periods should be adjusted to allocate the assets
revised carrying amount, minus any residual value, over its remaining useful life.
An impairment loss that has arisen on purchased goodwill cannot be reversed.
This is because any reversal of an impairment loss to goodwill is likely to be
caused by an increase in internally-generated goodwill rather than a reversal of
the impairment of purchased goodwill. Internally-generated goodwill must not be
reported as an asset.
207
208
It also requires that measurement for interim reporting purposes must be made
on a year-to-date basis.
IAS 36 prohibits reversal of impairment loss for goodwill
IAS 39 prohibits reversal of impairment loss recognised in P&L for available for
sale (AFS) equity instruments and for financial assets carried at cost.
This leads to an apparent conflict
An impairment loss on goodwill recognised in the interim financial statements
might not have been recognised at the next year end (due to change in
circumstances).
The issue
Should an impairment loss on goodwill (and certain investments) recognised in
an interim period, be reversed if a loss would not have been recognised (or a
smaller loss would have been recognised) if the assessment had been made only
at a later reporting date?
Consensus
The impairment principle overrides the interim measurement rule.
An impairment loss recognised in a previous interim period in respect of goodwill
(or certain investments) must not be reversed when circumstances change by a
later reporting date.
Exxample: IFRIC 10: In
nterim financial reporting and impairment
Entity X is a listed company that is required to produce quarterly financial
statements in accordance with IAS 34.
End of Q1
There were indications of impairment of one of Entity Xs cash-generating units
(CGU).
The carrying amount of the CGU was Rs. 120,000 including goodwill of Rs.
30,000).
The recoverable amount of the CGU was estimated to be Rs. 100,000.
Therefore, an Impairment of Rs. 20,000 was booked in the Q1 financial
statements. This was allocated to goodwill included within the CGU.
End of Q4 (year-end)
At the year-end the recoverable amount is unchanged at Rs. 100,000.
The carrying amount of the CGU that would have been determined if no
impairment had been booked in Q1 was Rs. 90,000 (accounting for depreciation
charge for the three quarters).
Therefore, if interim financial statements had not been prepared at Q1 and the
impairment test was carried out for the purpose of preparing the annual financial
statements there would be no impairment loss.
Application of the IAS 34 (year-to-date) approach would suggest reversal of the
loss previously recognised. However since that impairment was allocated to
goodwill, the impairment loss cannot be reversed.
209
The amount of impairment losses recognised in profit or loss for the period
and the line item in which those items are included.
210
b)
c)
Rs
240,000
(36,000)
Carrying amount
204,000
Impairment loss at the beginning of Year 4 of Rs. 104,000 (Rs. 204,000 Rs.
100,000). This is charged to profit or loss.
Depreciation charge in Year 4 of Rs. 10,000 (= Rs. 100,000 10). The
depreciation charge is based on the recoverable amount of the asset.
Solution
a)
Carrying amount on
Cost
Accumulated depreciation at 1 January Year 3
(2 years (240,000 20))
Rs.
240,000
Carrying amount
Valuation at 1 January Year 3
216,000
250,000
(24,000)
Revaluation surplus
b)
34,000
Rs.
250,000
(13,889)
Carrying amount
236,111
Note: The depreciation charge of Rs. 13,889 is made up of Rs. 12,000 (being
that part of the charge that relates to the original historical cost) and Rs.
1,889 being the incremental depreciation.
Rs. 1,889 would be transferred from the revaluation surplus into retained
earnings.
c)
d)
211
212
CHAPTER
10
Contents
1 Sale of non-current assets
2 Introduction to IFRS 5
3 Classification of non-current assets (or disposal
groups) as held for sale
4 Measurement of non-current assets (or disposal
groups) classified as held for sale
5 Presentation and disclosure
6 Discontinued operations
213
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
214
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from its use or from
its disposal.
If a non-current asset is disposed of, the gain or loss on the disposal should be
included in profit or loss in the period in which the disposal occurs. The gain or
loss should not be included in sales revenue.
The gain or loss on the disposal is calculated as:
Illustration: Gain or loss on disposal
Rs.
Rs.
(X)
(X)
(X)
215
216
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
INTRODUCTION TO IFRS 5
Section overview
Objective of IFRS 5
Scope of IFRS 5
measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell;
non-current assets;
discontinued operations.
Disposal group
Definition
Disposal group a group of assets to be disposed of in a single transaction, and
any liabilities directly associated with those assets that will be transferred in the
transaction.
A disposal group may be a group of cash-generating units, a single cashgenerating unit, or part of a cash-generating unit.
Some disposal groups might fall into the definition of a discontinued operation.
217
Measurement
The measurement requirements of IFRS 5 apply to all recognised non-current
assets and disposal groups except for:
non-current assets that are accounted for in accordance with the fair value
model in IAS 40 Investment Property.
non-current assets that are measured at fair value less estimated point-ofsale costs in accordance with IAS 41 Agriculture.
218
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
Rule
Criteria
3.1 Rule
A non-current asset (or disposal group) must be classified as held for sale when
its carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather
than through continuing use.
3.2 Criteria
The following conditions must apply at the reporting date for an asset (or disposal
group) to be classified as held for sale:
it must be available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only
to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets (or disposal
groups);
the asset (or disposal group) must be actively marketed for sale at a
price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value;
the sale must be expected to be completed within one year from the date of
classification (except in limited circumstances) and actions required to
complete the plan should indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes
to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
If the criteria are met for a non-current asset (or disposal group) after the
reporting date but before the authorisation of the financial statements for issue,
that asset must not be classified as held for sale as at the reporting date.
However the entity is required to make certain disclosures in respect of the noncurrent asset (or disposal group).
219
220
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
there is sufficient evidence that the entity remains committed to its plan to
sell the asset (or disposal group).
IFRS 5 sets out detailed guidance on when this is deemed to be the case.
Costs to sell that are to be paid after one year should be discounted with the
unwinding of the discount recognised subsequently as finance cost in the
statement of profit or loss.
221
Subsequent remeasurement
4.1 Measurement of non-current assets and disposal groups held for sale
Assets held for sale and disposal groups should be measured at the lower of:
If the value of the held for sale asset is adjusted from carrying amount to fair
value less costs to sell, any impairment should be recognised as a loss in the
statement of profit or loss for the period unless the asset to which it relates is
carried at a previously recognised revaluation surplus. In this case the loss is
taken to other comprehensive income to the extent that it is covered by the
previously recognised surplus on that asset. Any amount not covered is
recognised in the statement of profit or loss.
A non-current asset must not be depreciated (or amortised) while it is classified
as held for sale or while it is part of a disposal group that is held for sale.
Example: Impact of classification as held for sale
An asset is reclassified as held for sale, when its carrying amount is Rs. 20
million.
Its fair value less estimated costs to sell is Rs. 17 million.
The asset should be revalued at Rs. 17 million and a loss of Rs. 3 million should
be reported in the period.
If the carrying amount is less than the fair value less costs to sell there is no
impairment. In this case there is no adjustment to the carrying amount of the
asset. (A gain is not recognised on reclassification as held for sale).
222
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
Rs.
Cost
80,000
(40,000)
40,000
49,000
40,000
Cost (plant)
80,000
Accumulated depreciation
Credit
40,000
223
Year 5
The asset is sold to give the following profit on disposal:
Rs.
Proceeds
48,000
Carrying amount
(40,000)
Gain
8,000
48,000
40,000
Credit
224
8,000
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
Rs.
Cost
80,000
(40,000)
40,000
39,000
Credit
39,000
1,000
Cost (plant)
80,000
Accumulated depreciation
40,000
Year 5
The asset is sold to give the following loss on disposal:
Rs.
Proceeds
37,500
Carrying amount
(39,000)
Loss
1,500
225
Credit
37,500
39,000
1,500
goodwill; then
20,000
52,000
80,000
Inventory
21,000
Financial assets
17,000
Total
190,000
The entity estimates that the fair value less costs to sell of the disposal group is
Rs. 160,000.
This means that the entity must recognise an impairment loss of Rs. 30,000 (Rs.
190,000 - Rs. 160,000).
Allocation of the impairment loss:
The first Rs. 20,000 of the impairment loss reduces the goodwill to zero.
The remaining Rs. 10,000 of the impairment loss should be allocated to the noncurrent assets in the disposal group pro rata to their carrying value.
226
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
Carrying
amount before
allocation
Impairment
loss
Carrying
amount after
allocation
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Goodwill
20,000
20,000
52,000
3,399
48,601
80,000
5,228
74,772
Inventory
21,000
1,373
19,627
Financial assets
17,000
17,000
190,000
30,000
160,000
Total
This impairment loss of Rs. 30,000 will be included in the reported profit or loss
from discontinued operations.
the amount at which it would have been carried if it had never been
classified as held for sale (i.e.: its carrying amount before it was classified
as held for sale as adjusted for any depreciation, amortisation or
revaluations that would have been recognised if it had not been so
classified); and
its recoverable amount at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.*
227
the effect of the decision on the results of operations for the period and any
prior periods presented.
228
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Section overview
Discontinued operation
Other disclosures
Closing down some operations will affect the future financial prospects of
the entity.
2.
3.
229
operation unless the asset meets the definition of a component of an entity. The
asset disposal should simply be accounted for in the normal way, with the gain
or loss on disposal included in the operating profit for the year.
An operation cannot be classified as discontinued in the statement of financial
position if the criteria for classifying it as discontinued are met after the end of the
reporting period.
For example, suppose that an entity with a financial year ending 30 June shuts
down a major line of business in July and puts another major line of business up
for sale. It cannot classify these as discontinued operations in the financial
statements of the year just ended in June, even though the financial statements
for this year have not yet been approved and issued.
A disposal group might be, for example, a major business division of a company.
For example a company that operates in both shipbuilding and travel and tourism
might decide to put its shipbuilding division up for sale. If the circumstances meet
the definition of held for sale in IFRS 5, the shipbuilding division would be a
disposal group held for sale.
a single amount on the face of the statement of profit or loss comprising the
total of:
x
the net cash flows attributable to the operating, investing and financing
activities of discontinued operations.
The analysis may be presented in the notes or on the face of the statement
of profit or loss. (If presented on the face of the statement of profit or loss it
must be presented in a section identified as relating to discontinued
operations).
230
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
The analysis is not required for disposal groups that are newly acquired
subsidiaries that are classified as held for sale on acquisition.
These disclosures are not required for disposal groups that are newly acquired
subsidiaries that are classified as held for sale on acquisition.
Comparatives
Comparatives must be restated for these disclosures so that the disclosures
relate to all operations that have been discontinued by the reporting date for the
latest period presented.
Example: Presentation of discontinued operations in the statement of financial
position
Information relating to discontinued operations might be presented as follows.
Statement of profit or loss
X Limited: Statement of profit or loss for the year ended 31 December
20X9
20X9
20X8
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Continuing operations
Revenue
9,000
8,500
Cost of sales
(5,100)
(4,700)
Gross profit
Other income
Distribution costs
Administrative expenses
Other expenses
Finance costs
3,900
50
(1,200)
(1,400)
(150)
(300)
3,800
100
(1,000)
(1,200)
(200)
(300)
900
(300)
1,200
(400)
600
800
250
180
850
980
Note
The single figure of Rs. 250,000 for after-tax profit or loss from discontinued
operations should be analysed in a note to the accounts. Alternatively, the
analysis could be given on the face of the statement of profit or loss.
Presentation in the statement of financial position
Non-current assets classified as held for sale must be disclosed separately from
other assets in the statement of financial position.
Similarly, assets and liabilities that are part of a disposal group held for sale
must be disclosed separately from other assets and liabilities in the statement of
financial position.
This also applies to the assets and liabilities of a discontinued operation.
Emile Woolf International
231
Rs. 000
300
(20)
Total
Rs. 000
900
(70)
2,000
720
900
Total assets
3,620
1,000
1,950
Total equity
2,950
Non--current liabilities
Current liabilities
Liabilities directly associated with non--current assets
classified as held for sale (see above)
400
200
Total liabilities
670
70
3,620
232
Chapter 10: IFRS 5: Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations
233
234
CHAPTER
11
Lease classification
Impact on presentation
235
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
236
Introduction
Leases
Types of lessor
Defined periods
Residual values
Lease payments
1.1 Introduction
The previous accounting model for leases as per IAS 17 required lessees and
lessors to classify their leases as either finance leases or operating leases and
account for those two types of leases differently. That model was criticised for
failing to meet the needs of users of financial statements because it did not
always provide a faithful representation of leasing transactions. In particular, it did
not require lessees to recognise assets and liabilities arising from operating
leases.
IFRS 16 introduces a single lessee accounting model and requires a lessee to
recognise assets and liabilities for all leases with a term of more than 12 months,
unless the underlying asset is of low value. A lessee is required to recognise a
right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying leased asset and a
lease liability representing its obligation to make lease payments.
1.2 Leases
IFRS 16 prescribes the accounting treatment of leased assets in the financial
statements of lessees and lessors.
Definition: Lease
A contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an asset (the
underlying asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration.
A lease is a way of obtaining a use of an asset, such as a machine, without
purchasing it outright. The company that owns the asset (the lessor) allows
another party (the lessee) to use the asset for a specified period of time in return
for a series of rental payments.
Types of lease
IFRS 16 identifies two types of lease.
Definitions
A lease that transfers substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to
ownership of an underlying asset is known as finance lease.
237
A lease that does not transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to
ownership of an underlying asset is known as operating lease.
The identification of a lease as a finance lease or an operating lease is crucial as
it determines how a lease is accounted for by the lessor.
This is explained in more detail in later sections.
238
239
The value of the asset at the end of the lease is called its residual value. This
figure might be guaranteed by the lessee. This means that if the asset is not
worth the amount guaranteed, the lessee must pay the lessor the shortfall.
On the other hand, the residual value might not be guaranteed.
Definition: Unguaranteed residual value and residual value guarantee
Unguaranteed residual value is that portion of the residual value of the underlying
asset, the realisation of which by the lessor is not assured or is guaranteed solely
by a party related to the lessor.
Residual value guarantee is a guarantee made to a lessor by a party unrelated to
the lessor that the value (or part of the value) of an underlying asset at the end of
a lease will be at least a specified amount.
(b)
(c)
(d)
payments of penalties for terminating the lease, if the lease term reflects
the lessee exercising an option to terminate the lease.
240
Lessors MLPs
Unguaranteed
residual value
10,000
4.868
48,680
2,573
0.513
1,320
50,000
nil
The interest rate implicit in the lease (its IRR) was given in the above example. In
an exam question you might have to calculate it in the usual way.
241
LEASE CLASSIFICATION
Section overview
242
In this case, because the rail cars are stored at XYZ Ltd. premises, it has a large
pool of similar rail cars and substitution costs are minimal, the benefits to XYZ
Ltd. of substituting the rail cars would exceed the costs of substituting the cars.
Therefore, XYZ Ltd. substitution rights are substantive and the arrangement does
not contain a lease.
243
effect at the inception of the lease. In these cases, the revised agreement is
regarded as a new agreement over its term.
However, changes in estimates (for example, changes in estimates of the
economic life or of the residual value of the leased property), or changes in
circumstances (for example, default by the lessee), do not give rise to a new
classification of a lease for accounting purposes.
The following flowchart may assist entities in making the assessment of whether a
contract is, or contains, a lease.
244
245
Therefore, the lessee will pay the full cash price of the asset together with related
finance expense over the lease term.
The lessee would only do this if it had access to the risks and benefits of
ownership.
In substance, this is just like borrowing the cash and buying the asset.
Therefore, the lease is a finance lease.
PV of future lease payments amounts to substantially all of the fair value of the
underlying asset
A lease is a finance lease if at the inception of the lease, the present value of all
the future lease payments amounts to substantially all of the fair value of the
underlying asset, or more. (The discount rate to be used in calculating the
present value of the lease payments is the interest rate implicit in the lease).
In this case, the lessee is paying the full cash price of the asset together with
related finance expense over the lease term.
Example: PV of future lease payments
A finance company has purchased an asset to lease out to a manufacturing
company.
The asset cost for Rs. 500,000 and has an economic life of 10 years.
The lease is for 9 years at an annual rental (in arrears) of Rs. 87,000 per annum.
The interest rate implicit in the lease is 10%.
Analysis: Lessors view
Time
Narrative
Cash flows
Discount
factor (10%)
1 to 9
Lessors LPs
87,000
5.759
Present
value
501,033
This is more than the fair value of the asset. This lease is a finance lease
(also note that the lease is for the major part of the expected economic
life of the asset which is another finance lease indicator).
Time
Narrative
Cash flows
Discount
factor (10%)
Present
value
1 to 9
Lessees LPs
87,000
5.759
501,033
This is more than the fair value of the asset. This lease is a finance lease
(also note that the lease is for the major part of the expected economic
life of the asset which is another finance lease indicator).
In the above example the lessee and the lessor have the same view of the lease.
This is not necessarily the case.
246
Narrative
Cash flows
Discount
factor (10%)
1 to 7
Lessors MLPs
10,000
4.868
Present
value
48,680
Narrative
Cash flows
Discount
factor (10%)
Present
value
1 to 4
Lessors MLPs
10,000
3.170
31,700
Practice question
247
Disclosure
(b)
any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, less any
lease incentives received;
(c)
(d)
248
At the commencement date, a lessee shall measure the lease liability at the
present value of the lease payments that are not paid at that date. The lease
payments shall be discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, if that
rate can be readily determined. If that rate cannot be readily determined, the
lessee shall use the lessees incremental borrowing rate.
Lease liability + Initial direct costs + Prepaid lease payments + Estimated costs to
dismantle, remove or restore, measured - Lease incentives received = Right-ofuse asset
Illustration: Double entry on initial recognition of a lease
(Assumes that the leased asset is an item of property, plant and equipment)
Debit
Credit
Property, plant and equipment (at cost)
Initial direct costs are often incurred in connection with specific leasing activities,
such as negotiating and securing leasing arrangements.
Any initial direct costs of the lessee are added to the amount recognised as an
asset.
Typical initial direct costs of a lessee includes;
Commissions
Legal fees*
Credit
Cash/bank
Example:
Jhang Construction enters into a 6 year lease of a machine on 1 January Year 1.
The fair value of the machine at the commencement of the lease was Rs. 80,000
and Jhang Construction incurred initial direct costs of Rs. 2,000 when arranging
the lease.
Double entry:
Debit
Credit
Property, plant and machinery (at cost)
80,000
80,000
2,000
Cash/bank
2,000
249
Recognition exemptions
A lessee may elect not to apply the requirements to recognise and measurment
the right-of-use the leased asset and liability to:
(a) short-term leases; and
(b) leases for which the underlying asset is of low value
Short-term lease
A lease that, at the commencement date, has a lease term of 12 months or less.
A lease that contains a purchase option is not a short-term lease.
Example - Applying the short term lease exemption
Lessee ABC enters into a 8-year lease of a machine to be used in manufacturing
parts for a plane that it expects to remain popular with consumers until it
completes development and testing of an improved model. The cost to install the
machine in DEF manufacturing facility is not significant. ABC and DEF each have
the right to terminate the lease without a penalty on each anniversary of the lease
commencement date.
The lease term consists of a one-year non-cancellable period because both ABC
and DEF have a substantive termination right
ABC and DEF have a substantive termination right
both can terminate the lease without penalty
and the cost to install the machine in DEF manufacturing facility is not
significant.
As a result, the lease qualifies for the short-term lease exemption.
Example Applying the leases of low value exemption
Lessee A is in the pharmaceutical manufacturing and distribution industry and has
the following leases:
leases of real estate: both office building and warehouse;
leases of office furniture;
leases of company cars, both for sales personnel and for senior management
and of varying quality, specification and value;
leases of trucks and vans used for delivery; and
leases of IT equipment such as laptops.
A determines that the leases of office furniture and laptops qualify for the
recognition exemption on the basis that the underlying assets, when they are new,
are individually of low value. B elects to apply the exemption to these leases.
As a result, it applies the recognition and measurement requirements in IFRS 16 to
its leases of real estate, company cars, trucks and vans.
250
Credit
X
X
Example:
Jhang Construction enters into a 6 year lease of a machine on 1 January Year 1.
The fair value of the machine at the commencement of the lease was Rs. 80,000
and Jhang Construction incurred initial direct costs of Rs. 2,000 when arranging
the lease.
The estimated residual value of the asset at the end of the lease is Rs. 8,000.
The estimated useful life of the asset is 5 years.
The accounting policy for similar owned machines is to depreciate them over their
useful life on a straight line basis.
251
Rs.
80,000
2,000
82,000
Residual value
(8,000)
Depreciable amount
74,000
Useful life (shorter of the lease term and the useful life)
5 years
14,800
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Rs..
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
82,000
82,000
82,000
82,000
82,000
nil
14,800
29,600
44,400
59,200
14,800
14,800
14,800
14,800
14,800
Carried forward
14,800
29,600
44,400
59,200
74,000
Carrying amount
67,200
52,400
37,600
22,800
8,000
Cost
Accumulated
depreciation:
Brought forward
The asset is depreciated down to a carrying amount at the end of the assets
useful life that is the estimated residual value
252
After the commencement date, a lessee should recognise in profit or loss, unless
the costs are included in the carrying amount of another asset applying other
applicable Standards, both:
(a) interest on the lease liability; and
(b) variable lease payments not included in the measurement of the lease liability
in the period in which the event or condition that triggers those payments
occurs.
Reassessment of the lease liability
After the commencement date, a lessee should re-measure the lease liability by
using either unchanged discount rate or should re-measure the lease liability by
discounting the revised discount rate to reflect changes to the lease payments. A
lessee should recognise the amount of the re-measurement of the lease liability
as an adjustment to the right-of-use asset.
However, if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset is reduced to zero and
there is a further reduction in the measurement of the lease liability, a lessee
should recognise any remaining amount of the re-measurement in profit or loss.
During each year, the lessee makes one or more lease payments. The payment
is recorded in the ledger account as follows.
Illustration:
Debit
Liabilities: lease obligations
Credit
Cash/bank
A lease liability is measured in the same way as any other liability. The balance at
any point in time is as follows:
Illustration:
Rs.
X
(X)
(X)
253
A lessee shall re-measure the lease liability by discounting the revised lease
payments using a revised discount rate, if either:
(a)
there is a change in the lease term. A lessee shall determine the revised
lease payments on the basis of the revised lease term; or
(b)
Finance charge
The total rental payments over the life of the lease will be more than the amount
initially recognised as a liability. The difference is finance charge.
The total finance charge that arises over the life term is the difference between
the amount initially recognised as the lease liability and the sum of the lease
payments from the standpoint of the lessee.
Illustration: Total finance charge
Rs.
Lessees lease payments (sum of all payments made by the
lessee to the lessor)
Amount on initial recognition
X
(X)
Rs.
108,000
8,000
116,000
(80,000)*
36,000
* This is the amount of the liability, The asset is recognised at Rs. 82,000
254
The finance charge (interest) is recognised over the life of the lease by adding a
periodic charge to the liability for the lease obligation with the other side of the
entry as an expense in profit or loss for the year.
Illustration:
Debit
Credit
X
X
Lease modification
Definition: Lease modification
A change in the scope of a lease, or the consideration for a lease, that was not
part of the original terms and conditions of the lease (for example, adding or
terminating the right to use one or more underlying assets, or extending or
shortening the contractual lease term).
A lessee should account for a lease modification as a separate lease if both:
(a) the modification increases the scope of the lease by adding the right to use
one or more underlying assets; and
(b) the consideration for the lease increases by an amount commensurate with
the stand-alone price for the increase in scope and any appropriate
adjustments to that stand-alone price to reflect the circumstances of the
particular contract.
For a lease modification that is not accounted for as a separate lease, at the
effective date of the lease modification a lessee should:
(a) allocate the consideration in the modified contract. Following is the guidance
for allocating the consideration received;
i.
ii. The relative stand-alone price of lease and non-lease components should
be determined on the basis of the price the lessor, or a similar supplier,
would charge an entity for that component, or a similar component,
separately. If an observable stand-alone price is not readily available, the
lessee should estimate the stand-alone price, maximising the use of
observable information.
However, as a practical expedient, a lessee may elect, by class of
underlying asset, not to separate non-lease components from lease
components, and instead account for each lease component and any
associated non-lease components as a single lease component.
(b) determine the lease term of the modified lease; and
255
(c) remeasure the lease liability by discounting the revised lease payments using
a revised discount rate. The revised discount rate is determined as the
interest rate implicit in the lease for the remainder of the lease term, if that
rate can be readily determined, or the lessees incremental borrowing rate at
the effective date of the modification, if the interest rate implicit in the lease
cannot be readily determined.
For a lease modification that is not accounted for as a separate lease, the lessee
should account for the re-measurement of the lease liability by:
(a) decreasing the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset to reflect the partial
or full termination of the lease for lease modifications that decrease the scope
of the lease. The lessee should recognise in profit or loss any gain or loss
relating to the partial or full termination of the lease.
(b) making a corresponding adjustment to the right-of-use asset for all other
lease modifications.
Lease term
An entity should determine the lease term as the non-cancellable period of a
lease, together with both:
(a) periods covered by an option to extend the lease if the lessee is reasonably
certain to exercise that option; and
(b) periods covered by an option to terminate the lease if the lessee is
reasonably certain not to exercise that option.
(c) re-measure the lease liability by discounting the revised lease payments
using a revised discount rate. The revised discount rate is determined as the
interest rate implicit in the lease for the remainder of the lease term, if that
rate can be readily determined, or the lessees incremental borrowing rate at
the effective date of the modification, if the interest rate implicit in the lease
cannot be readily determined.
256
Lease liability:
Year
Opening
liability
Interest
(11.176751%)
Lease
payments
Closing
liability
1
2
3
4
80,000
70,941
60,870
49,674
8,941
7,929
6,803
5,552
(18,000)
(18,000)
(18,000)
(18,000)
70,941
60,870
49,674
37,226
37,226
4,161
(18,000)
23,386
23,386
2,614
(26,000)
36,000
The interest expense is calculated by multiplying the opening liability by
11.176751% in each year (so as to provide a constant rate of charge on the
outstanding obligation).
The lease obligation consists of the capital balance outstanding. This can be
shown as follows:
Example:
Lease liability:
Year
Opening
balance
Lease
payments
Interest
Capital
repayments
Closing
balance
80,000
(18,000)
8,941
(9,059)
70,941
70,941
(18,000)
7,929
(10,071)
60,870
60,870
(18,000)
6,803
(11,197)
49,674
49,674
(18,000)
5,552
(12,448)
37,226
37,226
(18,000)
4,161
(13,839)
23,386
23,386
(26,000)
2,614
(23,386)
257
Credit
8,000
Leased Asset
8,000
In other words, the Rs. 8,000 part of the final year payment to the lessor of Rs.
26,000 is not cash but the transfer of the asset.
If the asset is worth less that Rs. 8,000 the lessee must make good any shortfall.
In this case the asset is written down to its value at the date of the transfer (as
agreed between the lessee and the lessor) and the lessee will pay cash to the
lessor to compensate for any difference.
Example (continued): Final payment in respect of the guaranteed residual value
The asset has a carrying amount of Rs. 8,000 at the end of the lease but is only
worth Rs. 5,000.
The lessee would make the following double entries.
Write down the asset
Debit
3,000
Leased Asset
Pay the lessor the guaranteed residual value
Liabilities: lease obligations
Credit
3,000
8,000
Leased Asset
5,000
Cash/bank
3,000
Example:
A company leases an asset (as lessee) on 1 January 20X1. The terms of the lease are
to pay:
x
The fair value of the asset (equivalent to the present value of minimum lease
payments) on 1 January 20X1 is Rs. 80,000. Its useful life to the company is five
years.
258
As part of the lease agreement the company guaranteed to the lessor that the asset
could be sold for Rs. 8,000 at the end of the lease term. It also incurred Rs. 2,000 of
costs in setting up the lease agreement.
The interest rate implicit in the lease has been calculated as 10.0%.
Requirements
(a) Prepare the relevant extracts from the financial statements (excluding notes)
in respect of the above lease for the year ended 31 December 20X1.
(b) Explain what would happen at the end of the lease if the asset could be sold by
the lessor:
i. For Rs. 10,000
ii. For only Rs. 6,000
(a)
14,800
7,420
Rs.
67,200
56,182
Current liabilities
Finance lease liability (Working) (65,620 56,182)
WORKING
20X1
20X2
(b)
Bal b/f
Rs.
9,438
Interest accrued
at 10%
Rs.
Payment 31
Dec
Rs.
Bal c/f 31
Dec
Rs.
7,420
6,562
(16,000)
(16,000)
65,620
56,182
80,000
(5,800)
74,200
65,620
259
i. If the lessor is able to sell the asset for more than the value guaranteed
by the lessee, the lessee has no further liability and derecognises the
asset and lease liability:
Dr Finance lease liability
Rs. 8,000
Rs. 8,000
ii. If the lessor is unable to sell the asset for the value guaranteed by the
lessee, the lessee has a liability to make up the difference of Rs. 8,000 Rs. 6,000 = Rs. 2,000:
Recognise impairment loss on asset (as soon as known during the lease
term):
Dr Profit or loss
Rs. 2,000
Rs. 2,000
Rs. 8,000
Cr Cash
Rs. 2,000
Rs. 6,000
Opening
balance
Lease
payments
Interest
Capital
repayments
Closing
balance
80,000
(18,000)
8,941
(9,059)
70,941
70,941
(18,000)
7,929
(10,071)
60,870
n
This is the
current
liability
n
This is the
non-current
liability
Liability:
Current liability
Rs.
10,071
Non-current liability
60,870
70,941
260
80,000
72,009
(18,000)
(18,000)
62,000
54,009
10,009
8,719
72,009
62,728
62,728
(18,000)
44,728
7,221
51,948
3
4
51,948
39,429
(18,000)
(18,000)
33,948
21,429
5,480
3,459
39,429
24,888
24,888
(18,000)
6,888
1,112
8,000
8,000
(8,000)
36,000
The interest expense is calculated by multiplying the opening liability by
16.1434% in each year (so as to provide a constant rate of charge on the
outstanding obligation).
In the above example the first payment of Rs. 18,000 is made on the first day of
the lease term. Therefore it does not include any interest and is a repayment of
capital.
The year 1 interest of Rs. 10,009 is recognised at the end of year 1 (31
December Year 1). It is paid the next day by the payment of Rs. 18,000 made on
1 January Year 2.
The closing liability at the end of year 1 is made up of the interest accrued in year
1 and an amount of capital which will be paid off in year 2.
261
Year
Opening
balance
Lease
payments
Interest
Capital
repayments
Closing
balance
1
2
80,000
62,000
(18,000)
(18,000)
10,009
(18,000)
(7,991)
62,000
54,009
51,948
(18,000)
8,719
(9,281)
44,728
39,429
(18,000)
7,221
(10,779)
33,948
24,888
(18,000)
5,480
(12,520)
21,429
6 (start)
8,000
(18,000)
3,459
(14,541)
6,888
6 (end)
6,888
(8,000)
1,112
(6,888)
Opening
balance
80,000
62,000
Lease
payments
(18,000)
(18,000)
Liability:
Current liabilities
Interest expense
Current part of lease liability
Non-current liability
Non-current part of lease liability
Total lease liability (for proof)
Total liability (for proof)
262
Interest
10,009
Interest
expense
current
liability
Capital
repayments
(18,000)
(7,991)
lease
current
liability
Rs.
Closing
balance
62,000
54,009
lease noncurrent
liability
10,009
7,991
54,009
62,000
72,009
Practice question
The fair value of aleased asset, lease commencing on 1 January Year 1 is Rs.
10,000.
The lease is for three years with payments of Rs. 4,021 annually on 1 January Year
1, Year 2 and Year 3.
The interest rate implicit in the lease is 22.25%.
Required
Complete the lease payment table for all three years 1 to 3, and calculate the
current liability and the non-current liability at 31 December Year 1 under the
actuarial method.
3.8 Disclosures
A lessee shall disclose information about its leases for which it is a lessee in a
single note or separate section in its financial statements. However, a lessee
need not duplicate information that is already presented elsewhere in the financial
statements, provided that the information is incorporated by cross-reference in
the single note or separate section about leases.
A lessee shall disclose the following amounts for the reporting period:
(a) depreciation charge for right-of-use assets by class of underlying asset;
(b) interest expense on lease liabilities;
(c) the expense relating to short-term leases. This expense need not include the
expense relating to leases with a lease term of one month or less;
(d) the expense relating to leases of low-value assets. This expense shall not
include the expense relating to short-term leases of low-value assets;
(e) the expense relating to variable lease payments not included in the
measurement of lease liabilities;
(f) income from subleasing right-of-use assets;
(g) total cash outflow for leases;
(h) additions to right-of-use assets;
(i) gains or losses arising from sale and leaseback transactions; and
(j) the carrying amount of right-of-use assets at the end of the reporting period
by class of underlying asset.
A lessee shall provide the disclosures specified in paragraph 53 in a tabular
format, unless another format is more appropriate. The amounts disclosed shall
include costs that a lessee has included in the carrying amount of another asset
during the reporting period.
A lessee shall disclose the amount of its lease commitments for short-term leases
accounted for applying paragraph 6 if the portfolio of short-term leases to which it
is committed at the end of the reporting period is dissimilar to the portfolio of
263
TOTAL
------------------------------------- Rs ------------------------------------Payments
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
500,000
100,000
90,909
82,645
75,131
68,301
416,987
Lease liability
(CY = Prior year PV Payment during the
year + Interest exp)
316,987
248,685
173,554
90,909
416,987
333,630
250,273
166,917
83,560
31,699
24,869
17,355
9,091
83,013
Depreciation - B (Right
to use at year 0/ useful
life)
83,357
83,357
83,357
83,357
83,357
416,783
115,055
108,225
100,712
92,448
83,357
499,796
PV
264
Journal Enteries
At 1 July 2015
Debit
416,987
Lease liabilty
Credit
416,987
Lease Liabilty
100,000
Cash
100,000
At 30 June 2016
Depreciation expense
83,357
Acc. Depreciation
83,357
Intest expense
31,699
Lease Liability
68,301
Cash
100,000
265
Definitions
Finance lease accounting
Manufacturer/dealer leases
4.1 Definitions
The lessor does not record the leased asset in his own financial statements
because he has transferred the risks and rewards of ownership of the leased
asset to the lessee. Instead, he records the amount due to him under the terms of
the finance lease as a receivable.
The receivable is described as the net investment in the lease.
Definitions: Gross and net investment in the lease
Gross investment in the lease is the aggregate of:
(a)
the lease payments receivable by the lessor under a finance lease, and
(b)
Net investment in the lease is the gross investment in the lease discounted at the
interest rate implicit in the lease.
An earlier section explained that the interest rate implicit in the lease is the
discount rate that, at the inception of the lease, causes:
the present value of the lease payments and the unguaranteed residual
value; to be equal to
the sum of the fair value of the underlying asset and any initial direct costs of
the lessor.
Therefore the net investment in the lease is the sum of the fair value of the asset
plus the initial direct costs.
Definitions:
Un
nearned finance
income
(a)
(b)
Lessee
Lessor
266
Lessee
Lessor
Finance cost
Finance income
So as to provide a
constant periodic rate of
charge on the outstanding
obligation
So as to provide a
constant periodic rate of
return on the net
investment in the lease.
Subsequent
measurement
Pattern of
recognition
Initial recognition
The lessor records a receivable for the capital amount owed by the lessee. This
should be stated at the amount of the net investment in the lease.
Illustration: Double entry on Initial recognition of a finance lease
Debit
Net investment in the lease
Credit
Cash/bank
For finance leases other than those involving manufacturer or dealer lessors,
initial direct costs are included in the initial measurement of the finance lease
receivable thus reducing the amount of income recognised over the lease term to
below what it would have been had the costs not been treated in this way. The
result of this is that the initial direct costs are recognised over the lease term as
part of the income recognition process.
Initial direct costs of manufacturer or dealer lessors in connection with negotiating
and arranging a lease are excluded from the definition of initial direct costs. As a
result, they are excluded from the net investment in the lease.
The treatment of similar costs incurred by manufacturers and dealers is explained
later.
Subsequent measurement of the receivable
During each year, the lessor receives payments from the lessee. Each receipt is
recorded in the ledger account as follows.
Illustration: Lessor receipts
Debit
Cash/bank
Credit
A finance lease receivable (net investment in the lease) is measured in the same
way as any other financial asset. The balance at any point in time is as follows:
Illustration: Net investment in the lease
Rs.
(X)
(X)
267
X
X
(X)
Rs.
108,000
8,000
2,000
118,000
(80,000)
(2,000)
(82,000)
36,000
268
The finance income is recognised over the life of the lease by adding a periodic
return to the net investment in the lease with the other side of the entry as income
in profit or loss for the year.
Illustration:
Debit
Net investment in the lease
Credit
Year
Narrative
Cash
flow
Discount
factor
(10.798%)
Present
value
18,000
4.2553
76,595
lease payments
1 to 6
Annual rentals
8,000
0.54052
4,324
Unguaranteed residual
value
2,000
0.54052
1,081
82,000
80,000
2,000
82,000
269
Interest
(10.798%)
Lease
receipts
Closing net
investment
82,000
8,854
(18,000)
72,854
72,854
7,867
(18,000)
62,721
3
4
62,721
51,494
6,773
5,560
(18,000)
(18,000)
51,494
39,054
39,054
4,217
(18,000)
25,271
25,271
2,729
(26,000)
2,000
36,000
The interest income is calculated by multiplying the opening receivable by 10.798%
in each year (so as to provide a constant rate of return on the net investment in the
lease).
The final balance on the account is the unguaranteed residual value.
Finance lease accounting alternative double entry
There is an alternative approach to finance lessor double entry. Instead of
recognising net investment in a lease as an asset, a company could recognise
the gross investment in a lease as an asset and unearned finance income as a
liability. The balances on these two accounts would be netted off to give the net
investment in a lease at each reporting date.
Illustration: Double entry on Initial recognition of a finance lease
Debit
Gross investment in the lease
Credit
The rental receipts reduce the gross investment in the lease. In addition, the
interest income in the period is transferred from the unearned finance income
account to the statement of profit or loss.
270
Credit
108,000
9,000
1,000
118,000
(80,000)
(2,000)
(82,000)
36,000
Debit
Credit
118,000
36,000
82,000
271
End of year 1
Cash
18,000
18,000
8,854
8,854
Opening net
investment
Interest
(10.798%)
Lease
receipts
Closing net
investment
82,000
8,854
(18,000)
72,854
72,854
7,867
(18,000)
62,721
The net investment in the lease is found be netting the unearned finance income
against the lease receivable (gross investment in the lease) at each point in time.
The following table shows the balance on the two accounts at the start and at each
year end and the resulting net figures.
Year
Finance lease
receivable
118,000
36,000
(18,000)
(8,854)
100,000
27,146
(18,000)
(7,867)
82,000
19,279
(18,000)
(6,773)
64,000
12,506
(18,000)
(5,560)
46,000
6,946
(18,000)
(4,217)
28,000
2,729
(27,000)
(2,729)
Unearned
finance income
1,000
Net investment
in the lease
82,000
72,854
62,721
51,494
39,054
25,271
1,000
Note that the net investment in the lease is the same as before.
272
Example:
A company leased an asset to another company on 1 January 20X1 on the following
terms.
Lease term
4 years
Inception of lease
1.1.X1
Rs. 22,000
Rs. 10,000
Rs. 12,000
Rs. 82,966
Rs. 700
11%
Requirements
a) Calculate the unguaranteed residual value and the net investment in the lease
as at 1 January 20X1
b) Prepare extracts from the financial statements of the lessor for the year ended
31.12.X1 (excluding notes)
a) Unguaranteed residual value and net investment in the lease at 1 January
20X1
Date
Gross
Discount
Net
investment
factor
investment
Rs.
(11%)
Rs.
1.1.X1
Instalment
22,000
22,000
1.1.X2
Instalment
22,000
0.901
19,822
1.1.X3
Instalment
22,000
0.812
17,864
1.1.X4
Instalment
22,000
0.731
16,082
31.12.X4
Guaranteed residual
value
10,000
0.659
6,590
Minimum lease
payments
31.12.X4
98,000
Unguaranteed
residual value
2,000
Investment in the
lease
100,000
82,358
0.659
Lessee's
liability
1,318
83,676
Lessor's
asset
Note: The net investment in the lease is equal to the fair value of the asset of
Rs. 82,966 plus the lessor's costs of Rs. 700. In this instance there is a
rounding difference of Rs. 10.
273
274
Lease modifications
A lessor shall account for a modification to a finance lease as a separate lease if
both:
a. the modification increases the scope of the lease by adding the right to use
one or more underlying assets; and
b. the consideration for the lease increases by an amount commensurate with
the stand-alone price for the increase in scope and any appropriate
adjustments to that stand-alone price to reflect the circumstances of the
particular contract.
For a modification to a finance lease that is not accounted for as a separate
lease, a lessor shall account for the modification as follows:
a. if the lease would have been classified as an operating lease had the
modification been in effect at the inception date, the lessor shall:
i.
account for the lease modification as a new lease from the effective date
of the modification; and
ii. measure the carrying amount of the underlying asset as the net
investment in the lease immediately before the effective date of the lease
modification.
b. otherwise, the lessor shall apply the requirements of IFRS 9.
275
Rs. 2,000,000
Rs. 1,500,000
Finance option:
Annual rental
Rs. 804,230
Lease term
3 years
Interest rate
10%
nil
Rs. 20,000
Discount factor
t1 to t3 @ 10%
Rs.
2,000,000
2,000,000
Debit
2,000,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
Asset (Inventory)
Cost of setting up the lease
1,500,000
Credit
20,000
20,000
276
Year
Opening net
investment
Interest (10%)
Lease
receipts
Closing net
investment
2,000,000
200,000
(804,230)
1,395,770
1,395,770
139,577
(804,230)
731,117
731,117
73,113
(804,230)
nil
Bank
Inventory
B/f
Net
investment in
the lease
Profit or loss
2,000,000Dr
2,000,000Cr
1,500,000Dr
Revenue
Cost of sales
Set up cost
(1,500,000)Cr
(1,500,000)Dr
(20,000)Cr
(20,000)Dr
Profit on sale
480,000Cr
Lease income
Lease rental
200,000Dr
804,230Dr
200,000Cr
(804,230)Cr
1,395,770Dr
680,000Cr
Rs. 2,000,000
Rs. 1,500,000
Finance option:
Annual rental
Rs. 764,018
Lease term
3 years
Interest rate
10%
Rs. 133,100
Rs. 20,000
Discount factors:
t3 @ 10%
t1 to t3 @ 10%
277
Workings
W1: Revenue lower of:
Rs.
2,000,000
764,018u 2.487
W2: Present value of the unguaranteed residual value
Rs.
100,000
Debit
Credit
1,900,000
1,900,000
1,400,000
Asset (Inventory)
Transfer
1,400,000
100,000
100,000
20,000
Interest (10%)
Lease
receipts
Closing net
investment
2,000,000
200,000
(764,018)
1,435,982
1,435,982
143,598
(764,018)
815,562
815,562
81,556
(764,018)
133,100
Year
1
Opening net
investment
20,000
1,900,000
100,000
278
Bank
B/f
Inventory
Profit or loss
1,900,000Dr
1,900,000Cr
1,500,000Dr
Revenue
Cost of sales
Set up cost
Net
investment in
the lease
(1,400,000)Cr
(1,400,000)Dr
(20,000)Cr
(20,000)Dr
Profit on sale
480,000Cr
Transfer
(100,000)Cr
Lease income
Lease rental
100,000Dr
200,000Dr
764,018Dr
200,000Cr
(764,018)Cr
1,435,982Dr
680,000Cr
A motor dealer acquires vehicles of a particular model from the manufacturer for
Rs. 21,000, a 20% discount on the recommended retail price of Rs. 26,250. It
offers them for sale at the recommended retail price with 0% finance over three
years, provided three annual payments of Rs. 8,750 are made in advance. The
market rate of interest is 8%.
A sale transaction made on 1 January 20X5 is recognised as a combination of an
outright sale and a finance lease. The present value of the minimum lease
payments is treated as the consideration for the outright sale and at 8% is
calculated as follows:
Year
20X5
Cash flow
Rs.
8,750
20X6
8,750
20X7
8,750
Discount factor at 8%
1.000
1
(1.08)= 0.926
1
2
(1.08) =0.857
Present value
Rs.
8,750
8,102
7,499
24,351
Requirement
How should the transaction be recognised by the dealer in the year ending 31
December 20X5?
Statement of comprehensive income
Revenue (lower of FV Rs. 26,250 and PV of MLPs Rs. 24,351)
24,351
Cost of sales (lower of cost and CV PV of unguaranteed residual
(21,000)
value)
Profit
3,351
Finance income: (Working)
1,248
Statement of financial position
Receivable (Working)
16,849
279
WORKING
20X5
Bal b/f
Instalments
in advance
c/f
Interest
income at
Bal c/f 8%
31 Dec
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
24,351
(8,750)
15,601
1,248
16,849
later than one year and not later than five years;
280
281
later than one year and not later than five years;
282
Sub-lease
Lessor (Buyer)
Transfer to buyer-lessor
is a sale
Derecognise the
underlying asset and
apply the lessee
accounting model to the
leaseback
Measure the ROU
asset at the retained
portion of the previous
carrying amount (i.e. at
cost)
Recognise a gain or
loss related to the rights
transferred to the lessor
Recognise the
underlying asset and
apply the lessor
accounting model to the
leaseback
Transfer to buyer-lessor
is not a sale
Continue to recognise
the underlying asset
Recognise a financial
liability under IFRS 9 for
any amount received
from the buyer-lessor
283
Before the transaction, the owner has the risks and rewards of ownership. The
owner sells the asset and then leases it back under a finance lease. The owner
has retained the risks and rewards of ownership. In substance this is not a sale
so profit should not be recognised. The accounting treatment is as follows.
There are two stages, the disposal (sale) and the finance leaseback:
The sale:
x
Any surplus from the sale in excess of the carrying amount should be
deferred and amortised over the term (life) of the lease.
Any deficit from the sale in shortage of the carrying amount should
also be deferred and amortised over the term (life) of the lease. (IFRS
16 does not prescribe any treatment for a loss on such transactions
but in practice it is also deferred).
The leaseback: The normal finance lease rules are then applied, to
reintroduce the asset to the statement of financial position of the lessee at its
fair value, and to establish a leasing obligation.
Example: Sale and finance leaseback
In 20X6 a company sold an asset and leased it back under a finance lease. The
asset had a carrying value of Rs. 70,000 and was sold for its market value of Rs.
120,000.
At the date of sale it had a remaining life of five years and was leased back for
the whole of this period at a rental of Rs. 28,000 per annum in arrears.
Debit
Rs.
120,000
The sale
Cash
Asset
Deferred income
Credit
Rs.
70,000
50,000
The leaseback
Asset
Lease obligation
120,000
120,000
284
IFRS 16 outlines specifies treatments for accounting for the profit or on the sale
of the asset, depending on whether the asset was sold for its fair value, for more
than fair value or for less than fair value and depending on whether the fair value
is less than the carrying amount of the asset that is the subject of the transaction.
Sale at fair value
This is just a normal sale. If an asset is sold at fair value, the gain or loss on
disposal is recognised immediately in profit or loss in the usual way.
Example: Sale and operating leaseback Sale at fair value
In early 20X7 a company sold an asset for Rs. 1.5 million and leased it back
under a five-year operating lease.
The asset had a carrying value of Rs. 1 million.
Debit
Rs.
Cash
Asset
Statement of comprehensive income
Credit
Rs.
1,500,000
1,000,000
500,000
Sale at more than fair value (fair value greater that carrying amount)
If an asset is sold at more than fair value, the normal gain or loss on disposal
(based on the difference between the carrying amount and fair value) is
recognised immediately in profit or loss.
The excess profit (based on the difference between the fair value and actual sale
value) should be deferred and released to profit or loss over the expected period
of use (the lease period).
Example: Sale and operating leaseback Sale above fair value
In early 20X7 a company sold an asset for Rs. 1.5 million and leased it back
under a five-year operating lease.
The asset had a carrying value of Rs. 1 million and a remaining useful life of ten
years.
The fair value of the asset at the date of sale was Rs. 1.2 million.
Debit
Rs.
Cash
Asset
Statement of comprehensive income
(Normal profit of Rs. 1.2m Rs. 1m)
Cr Deferred income
(Excess profit: this is Rs. 1.5m Rs. 1.2m)
Credit
Rs.
1,500,000
1,000,000
200,000
300,000
Note: The deferred income will be released to profit or loss over the lease term of
5 years.
285
Sale at less than fair value (fair value greater that carrying amount)
If an asset is sold at less than fair value, the gain or loss on disposal is
recognised immediately in profit or loss.
However, if the sale makes a loss and this is compensated for by future lease
payments at below market price, the loss should not be recognised immediately,
but deferred and then released to profit or loss over the expected period of use
(the lease period).
Example: Sale and operating leaseback Sale below fair value
In early 20X7 a company sold an asset for Rs. 1.5 million and leased it back
under a five-year operating lease.
The asset had a carrying value of Rs. 2 million and a remaining useful life of ten
years.
The fair value of the asset was Rs. 2.1 million.
Debit
Rs.
Cash
Credit
Rs.
1,500,000
Asset
Statement of comprehensive income
2,000,000
500,000
Example: Sale and operating leaseback Sale below fair value compensated by
lower future rentals
In early 20X7 a company sold an asset for Rs. 1.5 million and leased it back
under a five-year operating lease.
The asset had a carrying value of Rs. 2 million and a remaining useful life of ten
years.
The fair value of the asset was Rs. 2.1 million.
The company accepted an offer below the fair value of the asset because it was
able to negotiate rentals at below the market rate in compensation.
Cash
Asset
Deferred loss (on the statement of financial position)
Debit
Rs.
1,500,000
Credit
Rs.
2,000,000
500,000
The deferred loss amortised in proportion to the lease payments over the period
for which the asset is expected to be used.
In each case above the difference between the fair value of the asset and the
carrying amount is not recognised.
Sale where fair value is less than carrying amount
If the fair value at the time of a sale and leaseback transaction is less than the
carrying amount of the asset, the difference must be recognised immediately as a
loss. This means that the asset is written down to its fair vale before accounting
for the sale and operating leaseback. The earlier rules concerning the recognition
of a profit or loss on disposal then apply.
286
Credit
Rs.
300,000
Asset
Step 2: Sale and leaseback:
300,000
Cash
Asset
Cr Deferred income
(Excess profit: this is Rs. 1.8m Rs. 1.7m)
1,800,000
1,700,000
100,000
Example: Sale and operating leaseback Fair value less than carrying amount
and sale at less than fair value.
In early 20X7 a company sold an asset for Rs. 1.6 million and leased it back
under a five-year operating lease.
The asset had a carrying value of Rs. 2 million and a remaining useful life of ten
years.
The fair value of the asset was Rs. 1.7 million.
Debit
Rs.
Step 1: Write down the asset:
Statement of comprehensive income
(Rs. 2m Rs. 1.7m)
Asset
Step 2: Sale and leaseback:
Cash
Asset
Statement of comprehensive income
Credit
Rs.
300,000
300,000
1,600,000
1,700,000
100,000
287
6.4
Sub-lease
A sub-lease is a transaction in which a lessee (or intermediate lessor) grants a
right to use the underlying asset to a third party, and the lease (or head lease)
between the original lessor and lessee remains in effect.
A company applies IFRS 16 to all leases of right-of-use assets in a sub-lease.
The intermediate lessor accounts for the head lease and the sub-lease as two
different contracts.
Head Office
Sub-lessee
An intermediate lessor classifies the sub-lease as a finance lease or as an
operating lease with reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the head
lease. That is, the intermediate lessor treats the right-of-use asset as the
underlying asset in the sub-lease, not the item of property, plant or equipment
that it leases from the head lessor.
At the commencement date of the sub-lease, if the intermediate lessor cannot
readily determine the rate implicit in the sub-lease, then it uses the discount rate
that it uses for the head lease to account for the sub-lease, adjusted for any initial
direct costs associated with the sub-lease.
However, if the head lease is a short-term lease for which the company, as a
lessee, has elected the short-term lease exemption, then as an intermediate
lessor the company classifies the sub-lease as an operating lease.
Example Sub-lease classified as a finance lease with reference to the right-ofuse asset in the head lease
Head lease: Intermediate lessor L enters into a five-year lease for 5,000 million of
office space (the head lease) with Company M (the head lessor).
Sub-lease: At the beginning of Year 3, L sub-leases the 5,000 M of office space for
the remaining three years of the head lease to Sub-lessee N.office
L classifies the sub-lease with reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the
head lease. Because the sub-lease is for the whole of the remaining term of the
head lease i.e. the sub-lease is for the major part of the useful life of the rightof-use asset L classifies it as a finance lease.
At the commencement date of the sub-lease, L:
derecognises the right-of-use asset relating to the head lease that it transfers
to N and recognises the net investment in the sub-lease;
recognises any difference between the carrying amounts of the right-of-use
asset and the net investment in the sub-lease in profit or loss; and
continues to recognise the lease liability relating to the head lease, which
represents the lease payments owed to the head lessor.
During the term of the sub-lease, L recognises both interest income on the
sublease and interest expense on the head lease.
288
IMPACT ON PRESENTATION
Section overview
Opening
balance
Interest
(8%)
Lease
payment
Closing
balance
12,886
1,031
(5,000)
8,917
8,917
713
(5,000)
4,630
4,630
370
(5,000)
2,114
The numbers that would appear in the financial statements for year 1 if
the lease were treated as finance lease or as an operating lease are
shown below:
Statement of financial position
Non-current asset
Operating
lease
Rs.
Leased Asset
[(12,886 (1/3 of 12,866= 4,289)]
Finance
lease
289
8,597
Example:
The fair value of a leased asset, commencing on 1 January Year 1 is Rs. 12,886.
The lease is for three years with payments of Rs. 5,000 annually in arrears on 31
December Year 1, Year 2 and Year 3. The interest rate implicit in the lease is 8%.
Lease liability (given again for your convenience)
Liability:
Rs.
Non-current liability
4,630
Current liability
4,287
Total liability
8,917
4,289
Finance charge
1,013
5,000
5,302
5,000
Rental
290
Solution
Rs.
12,063
(10,000)
2,063
Actuarial method
Year ended
31
December
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Opening
balance
Lease
payment
Capital
outstanding
Rs.
10,000
7,309
4,021
Rs.
(4,021)
(4,021)
(4,021)
Rs.
5,979
3,288
Interest at
22.25%
Closing
balance
Rs.
1,330
733
Rs.
7,309
4,021
The non-current liability is the liability at the start of the next year after
deducting the first payment (Rs. 3,288).
The current liability is the payment in year 2 less any interest contained in it
that has not yet accrued.
Current liability, end of Year 1
Non-current liability, end of Year 1
Rs.
4,021*
3,288
7,309
* 4,021 can be divided into 1,330 of interest payable and 2691 of principal
payable
291
CHAPTER
12
292
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 36
B (a) 37
B (a) 49
294
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
PROVISIONS: RECOGNITION
Section overview
Introduction
Present obligation
1.1 Introduction
The first five sections of this chapter explain rules set out in IAS 37: Provisions,
contingent liabilities and contingent assets.
Definitions
Provisions are liabilities of uncertain timing or amount.
A liability is a present obligation of the enterprise arising from past events, the
settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow from the enterprise of
resources embodying economic benefits.
An obligating event is an event that creates a legal or constructive obligation that
results in an enterprise having no realistic alternative to settling that obligation.
Provisions differ from other liabilities because there is uncertainty about the
timing or amount of the future cash flows required to settle the liability.
Accruals are liabilities to pay for goods or services that have been received or
supplied but not yet invoiced. There is often a degree of estimation in the
measurement of accruals but any inherent uncertainty is much less than for
provisions.
IAS 37 applies to all provisions and contingencies apart from those covered by
the specific requirements of other standards.
In some countries the term provision is also used to describe the reduction in
the value of an asset. For example accountants might talk of provision for
depreciation, provision for doubtful debts and so on. These provisions are not
covered by this standard which is only about provisions that are liabilities.
Major accounting issues
There are three issues to address in accounting for provisions:
295
The event leading to the obligation must be past, and must have occurred before
the end of the reporting period when the provision is first recognised. No
provision is made for costs that may be incurred in the future but where no
obligation yet exists.
296
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
Illustration:
A company is planning a reorganisation. These plans are in an early stage.
There is no obligation (legal or constructive) to undertake the reorganisation. The
company cannot create a provision for reorganisation costs.
Only obligations arising from past events that exist independently of a company's
future actions are recognised as provisions.
Example:
Shan Properties owns a series of high rise modern office blocks in several major
cities in Pakistan.
The government introduces legislation that requires toughened safety glass to be
fitted in all windows on floors above the ground floor. The legislation only applies
initially to new buildings but all buildings will have to comply within 5 years.
Analysis:
There is no obligating event.
Even though Shan Properties will have to comply within 5 years it can avoid the
future expenditure by its future actions, for example by selling the buildings. There
is no present obligation for that future expenditure and no provision is recognised.
Example:
Jhang Energy Company operates in a country where there is no environmental
legislation. Its operations cause pollution in this country.
Jhang Energy Company has a widely published policy in which it undertakes to
clean up all contamination that it causes and it has a record of honouring this
published policy.
Analysis:
There is an obligating event. Jhang Energy Company has a constructive obligation
which will lead to an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits regardless
of the future actions of the company. A provision would be recognised for the
clean-up subject to the other two criteria being satisfied.
An obligation always involves another party to whom the obligation is owed.
However, it is not necessary to know the identity of that party. It is perfectly
possible to have an obligation to the public at large or to a group of people.
Example:
Shekhupura Household Appliances Corporation gives warranties at the time of sale
to purchasers of its products. Under the terms of the sale contract the company
undertakes to make good any manufacturing defects that become apparent within
three years from the date of sale.
In the period it has sold 250,000 appliances and estimates that about 2% will
prove faulty.
Analysis:
There is an obligating event being the sale of an item with the promise to repair it
as necessary. The fact that Shekhupura Household Appliances Corporation does
not know which of its customers will seek repairs in the future is irrelevant to the
existence of the obligation.
A provision would be recognised for the future repairs subject to the other two
criteria being satisfied.
Note that the estimate that only 2% will be faulty is irrelevant in terms of
recognising a provision. However, it would be important when it came to measuring
the size of the provisions. This is covered in the next section.
297
If details of a proposed new law have yet to be finalised, an obligation arises only
when the legislation is virtually certain to be enacted or is enacted
298
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
PROVISIONS: MEASUREMENT
Section overview
Introduction
Uncertainties
Time value
Future events
Reimbursements
2.1 Introduction
The amount recognised as a provision must be the best estimate, as at the end of
the reporting period, of the future expenditure required to settle the obligation.
This is the amount that the company would have to pay to settle the obligation at
this date. It is the amount that the company would have to pay a third party to
take the obligation off its hands.
The estimates of the outcome and financial effect of an obligation are made by
management based on judgement and experience of similar transactions and
perhaps reports from independent experts.
Risks and uncertainties should be taken into account in reaching the best
estimate. Events after the reporting period will provide useful evidence. (Events
after the reporting period are dealt with in more detail later.)
2.2 Uncertainties
Uncertainties about the amount to be recognised as a provision are dealt with by
various means according to the circumstances.
In measuring a single obligation, the best estimate of the liability may be the most
likely outcome. However, other possible outcomes should be considered. If there
are other possibilities which are mostly higher or mostly lower than the most likely
outcome, then the best estimate will be a higher or lower amount.
Example:
Gujrat Prefabricators Limited (GPL) has won a contract to provide temporary
accommodation for workers involved in building a new airport. The contract
involves the erection of accommodation blocks on a public park and two years
later the removal of the blocks and the reinstatement of the site.
The blocks have been built and it is now GPLs year-end.
GPL estimates that the task of removing the blocks and reinstating the park to its
present condition might be complex, resulting in costs with a present value of Rs.
2,000,000, or straightforward, resulting in costs with a present value of Rs.
1,300,000.
GPL estimates that there is a 60% chance of the job being straightforward.
Should a provision be recognised and if so at what value?
Analysis
Should a provision be recognised?
Is there a present obligation as a
Yes. A present obligation arises
due to the existence of a
result of a past event?
contractual term and the building
of the block.
299
Number
20% u 5,000 = 1,000
Substantial
400
200,000
Major
5% u 5,000 = 250
800
200,000
Provision
Total (R
Rs.)
100,000
500,000
Note that this would be reduced by the repairs already made by the year end
300
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
The discount rate used should be a pre-tax rate (or rates) that reflect(s) current
market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the
liability.
The need to discount is often found when accounting for decommissioning
liabilities. These are discussed in section 4.4.
Example:
Gujrat Prefabricators Limited (GPL) has won a contract to provide temporary
accommodation for workers involved in building a new airport. The contract
involves the erection of accommodation blocks on a public park and two years
later the removal of the blocks and the reinstatement of the site.
The blocks have been built and it is now 31 December 2015 (GPLs year-end).
GPL estimates that in two years it will have to pay Rs. 2,000,000 to remove the
blocks and reinstate the site.
The pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time
value of money and the risks specific to the liability is 10%.
The provision that should be recognised at 31 December 2015 is as follows:
u
301
2.5 Reimbursements
In some cases, a part or all of a companys provision may be recoverable from a
third party. For example, a company paying out to a customer under the terms of
a guarantee may itself be able to claim money back from one of its own suppliers.
IAS 37 requires that such a reimbursement:
302
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
Introduction
Use of provisions
Subsequent measurement
3.1 Introduction
IAS 37 is about the recognition and measurement of provisions which are of
course a credit balance. It gives little guidance on the recognition of the debit
entry on initial recognition of a provision saying that whether an expense or asset
is recognised is left to guidance in other standards.
Credit
Provision
Credit
Cash
If the provision is more than the amount needed to settle the liability the balance
is released as a credit back through the income statement.
If the provision is insufficient to settle the liability an extra expense is recognised.
IAS 37 also states that a provision may be used only for expenditures for which
the provision was originally recognised.
303
Credit
Income statement
Increase in a provision::
X
Decrease in a provision:
X
Provision
Profit or loss
304
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
1,000,000
1,000,000
31 December 2015
The claim has still not been settled. The lawyer now advises that the claim will
probably be settled in the customers favour at Rs. 1,200,000.
The provision is increased to Rs. 1,200,000 as follows.
Debit (R
Rs.)
Expenses
Provision
Credit (R
Rs.)
200,000
200,000
31 December 2016
The claim has still not been settled. The lawyer now believes that the claim will be
settled at Rs. 900,000.
The provision is reduced to Rs. 900,000 as follows.
Debit (R
Rs.)
Provision
Expenses
Credit (R
Rs.)
300,000
300,000
The reduction in the provision increases profit in the year and the provision in the
statement of financial position is adjusted down to the revised estimate of Rs.
900,000.
31 December 2016
The claim is settled for Rs. 950,000. On settlement, the double entry in the ledger
accounts will be:
Debit (R
Rs.)
Expenses
Provision
Cash
Credit (R
Rs.)
50,000
900,000
950,000
The charge against profit on settlement of the legal claim is Rs. 50,000.
The provision no longer exists. The total amount charged against profit over the
four years was the final settlement figure of Rs. 950,000.
When a provision is included in the statement of financial position at a discounted
value (at present value) the amount of the provision will increase over time, to
reflect the passage of time. In other words, as time passes the amount of the
discount gets smaller, so the reported provision increases. This increase in value
is included in borrowing costs for the period.
305
the opening and closing balances and movements in the provision during
the year;
306
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
Onerous contracts
Restructuring
IAS 37 explains how its rules apply in given circumstances. Some of the guidance is in
the body of the standard and some in an appendix to the standard.
307
4.3 Restructuring
A company may plan to restructure a significant part of its operations. Examples
of restructuring are:
308
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
has raised a valid expectation in those affected that it will carry out the
restructuring by starting to implement that plan or announcing its main
features to those affected by it.
A restructuring decision made before the end of the reporting period does not
give rise to a constructive obligation unless the company has:
A restructuring provision would not include costs that are associated with ongoing
activities such as:
marketing; or
309
Credit
Provision
The asset is depreciated over its useful life in the same way as other non-current
assets.
The provision is remeasured at each reporting date. If there has been no change
in the estimates (i.e. the future cash cost, the timing of the expenditure and the
discount rate) the provision will increase each year because the payment of the
cash becomes one year closer. This increase is described as being due to the
unwinding of the discount.
The amount due to the unwinding of the discount must be expensed.
Example: Deferred consideration
A company has constructed an oil rig which became operational on 1 January
2015.
The company has contracted to remove the oil rig and all associated infrastructure
and to restore the site to repair any environmental damage to the site on
completion of drilling activity. This is estimated to be at a cost of Rs. 8,000,000 in
10 years time.
The pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money and the risks specific to the liability is 10%.
1 January 2015 Initial measurement
Debit
Credit
Asset
3,084,346
Provision
3,084,346
31 December 2015
The provision is remeasured as:
Provision:
Rs.
Balance b/f
3,084,346
308,435
3,392,781
Rs.
310
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
Cost
Depreciation (
8,000,000
Rs.8,000,000
(800,000)
/10 years)
Carrying amount
7,200,000
Double entry:
Profit or loss (interest expense)
Debit
308,435
Provision
Credit
308,435
800,000
800,000
311
which has to replace the lining of its furnace could sell the furnace or stop using
it, although this is unlikely in practice.
IAS 37 states that a provision cannot be recognised for the cost of future repairs
or replacement parts unless the company has an obligation to incur the
expenditure, which is unlikely. The obligating event is normally the actual repair
or purchase of the replacement part.
Instead of recognising a provision, a company should capitalise expenditure
incurred on replacement of an asset and depreciate this cost over its useful life.
This is the period until the part needs to be replaced again. For example, the cost
of replacing the furnace lining should be capitalised, so that the furnace lining is a
non-current asset; the cost should then be depreciated over five years. (Note: IAS
16: Property, plant and equipment states that where an asset has two or more
parts with different useful lives, each part should be depreciated separately.)
Normal repair costs, however, are expenses that should be included in profit or
loss as incurred.
312
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
INTERPRETATIONS
Section overview
they are paid by entities that operate in a specific market identified by the
legislation (e.g. the entity is a bank);
they are triggered when a specific activity occurs (e.g. the entity operates
as a retail bank) or threshold is passed;
The following transactions are not within the scope of this interpretation:
Issues
IFRIC 21 addresses the following issues:
What constitutes the obligating event for the recognition of a levy liability?
313
Does the going concern principle imply the need for a discounted present
value obligation for future operating?
How should the demand for interim reporting affect the accounting
deferral or anticipation?
Consensus
The obligating event is the activity that triggers the payment of the levy as defined
in the legislation. For example, the obligating event may be the generation of
revenue from signing customers to an insurance contract.
Even though the obligating event may be the generation of revenue in the current
period from the prescribed activity, the amount may be calculated by reference
to revenue generated in the previous period.
An entity does not have a constructive obligation to pay a levy that will arise in a
future period as a result of being economically compelled to operate in that
period.
The going concern principle does not imply that an entity has a present obligation
to continue to operate in the future and therefore does not lead to the entity
recognising a liability at a reporting date for levies that will arise in a future period
(discounted or not!).
The liability is recognised progressively if the obligating event occurs over time.
For example, the liability to pay a levy from banking activity is based on the
revenue earned over time from that activity. However, if the obligating event is
earning revenue from banking on 31 December 2016, then the liability is
recognised at that instant based on the fact that the prescribed activity was going
on at 31 Dec 2016
If an obligation to pay is triggered by the passing of a threshold, then the
obligating event is the passing of that threshold (for example a minimum activity
threshold such as revenue or output produced)
The other side of the double entry for the recognition of a liability is typically to
expenses, but an asset might be recognised if an entity prepays the liability
before it has a present obligation.
The same recognition principle is applied to interim reporting. There is no:
314
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
contributors may have restricted access (if any) to any fund surplus
Scope
IFRIC 5 applies to accounting by a contributor for interests arising from
decommissioning funds that have both of the following features:
the contributors share of the fair value of the net assets of the fund
attributable to contributors.
Change in carrying value of this right (other than contributions to and payments
from the fund) is recognised in P&L.
Consensus: Obligations to make additional contributions
A contributor may have an obligation to make additional contributions in certain
circumstances, e.g.:
315
Such an obligation is a contingent liability within the scope of IAS 37.A liability is
recognised only if it is probable that additional contributions will be made.
Disclosure
The nature of an interest in a fund and any restrictions on access to its assets
must be disclosed.
Also the disclosure requirements of IAS 37 apply when:
316
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
Consensus
No liability arises for waste management costs for household electrical equipment
following from manufacture or sale
There is no obligation unless (and until) a market share exists during the
measurement period.
The obligating event is participation in the market during the measurement
period.
317
Definitions
6.1 Definitions
Contingent means dependent on something else happening.
Contingent liability
A contingent liability is one that does not exist at the reporting date but may do so
in the future or it is a liability that exists at the reporting date but cannot be
recognised because it fails one of the IAS 37 recognition criteria.
Definition: Contingent liability
A contingent liability is either of the following:
A contingent liability is a possible obligation that arises from past events and
whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one
or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the entity.
OR
A contingent liability is a present obligation that arises from past events but is not
recognised because it is not probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be
required to settle the obligation or the amount of the obligation cannot be
measured with sufficient reliability.
IAS 37 makes a distinction between:
possible obligations;
318
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
Example:
Company G is involved in a legal dispute with a customer, who is making a claim
against Company G for losses it has suffered as a consequence of a breach of
contract.
If Company Gs lawyers believe that the likelihood of the claim succeeding is
possible rather than probable, then the claim should be treated as a contingent
liability and not as a provision.
Contingent asset
Definition: Contingent asset
A contingent asset is a possible asset that arises from past events whose existence
will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more
uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the entity.
An example of a contingent asset might be a possible gain arising from an
outstanding legal action against a third party. The existence of the asset (the
money receivable) will only be confirmed by the outcome of the legal dispute.
Where practicable:
319
Provision
Contingent liability
Contingent
asset
Yes
Yes
No (but may
come into
existance in
the future)
Only a
possible
asset
Will
settlement
result in
outflow/
inflow of
economic
benefits?
Probable
outflow and
a reliable
estimate can
be made of
the obligation
Not probable
outflow or a
reliable
estimate
cannot be
made of the
obligation
Outflow to be
confirmed by
uncertain
future events
Inflow to be
confirmed by
uncertain
future events
Treatment in
the financial
statements
Recognise a
provision
Disclose as a
contingent
liability
(unless the
possibility of
outflow is
remote)
Disclose as a
contingent
liability
(unless the
possibility of
outflow is
remote)
Only disclose
if inflow is
probable
Decision tree
An Appendix to IAS 37 includes a decision tree, showing the rules for deciding
whether an item should be recognised as a provision, reported as a contingent
liability, or not reported at all in the financial statements.
320
Chapter 12: IAS 37: Provisions, contingent liabilities and contingent assets
Practice question
321
At 1 January
2015
Used in the
year
Statement of
comprehensive
income
(balance)
At 31
December
2015
Warranty
Legal
claim
Onerous
contract
Clean-up
costs
Total
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
500
1,250
750
nil
nil
(400)
(400)
280
9,000
1,440
1,000
11,720
630
9,000
1,440
1,500
12,570
W1
W2
W3
W4
Warranty: The company grants warranties on certain categories of goods.
The measurement of the provision is on the companys experience of the
likelihood and cost of paying out under the warranty.
Legal claim: The legal claim provision is in respect of a claim made by a
customer for damages as a result of faulty equipment supplied by the
company. It represents the present value of the amount at which the
company's legal advisors believe the claim is likely to be settled.
Onerous contract: The provision for the onerous contract is in respect of a
two-year fixed-price contract which the company entered into on 1 July
2015. Due to unforeseen cost increases and production problems, a loss on
this contract is now anticipated. The provision is based on the amount of
this loss up to the end of the contract.
Clean--up costs: The provision for clean-up costs is in respect of the
company's overseas mineral extraction operations.
The company is 18 months into a five year operating licence. The estimated
cost of cleaning up the site at the end of the five years is Rs.5,000,000. A
provision of Rs.1,000,000 per annum is recognised.
Contingent asset: The company is making a claim against a supplier of
components. These components led in part to the legal claim against the
company for which a provision has been made above. Legal advice is that
this claim is likely to succeed and should amount to around 40% of the
total damages (Rs.3.6 million).
W1 Warranty provision: 150 u Rs.7,000 u 60% = Rs.630,000.
W2
W3
322
CHAPTER
13
Contents
1 IAS 19: Employee benefits
2 Post-employment benefits
3 IFRIC 14: IAS19 The limit on a defined benefit
asset, minimum funding requirements and their
interaction
323
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 42
IFRIC 14: IAS 19 The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding
requirements and their interaction
324
Termination benefits
termination benefits.
325
Accounting principle
The basic principle in IAS 19 is that the cost of providing benefits to employees
should be matched with the period during which the employees work to earn the
benefits. This principle applies even when the benefits are payable in the future,
such as pension benefits.
IAS 19 requires an entity:
to recognise an expense when the entity makes use of the service provided
by the employee.
The basic double entry may therefore be (depending on the nature of the
employee benefits):
The expense must be accounted for on an accruals basis and any unpaid
entitlement should be recognised as a short-term liability. Discounting the liability
to a present value is not required, because it is payable within 12 months.
Short-term paid absences
Sometimes an entity may pay employees for absence for various reasons. These
include holidays, sickness and maternity leave.
Entitlement to paid absences falls into two categories:
accumulating
x
326
non-accumulating.
x
the formal terms of the plan contain a formula for determining the amount of
the benefit;
past practice gives clear evidence of the amount of the entitys constructive
obligation.
A present obligation exists when, and only when, the entity has no realistic
alternative but to make the payments.
b.
Recognition
An entity must recognise a liability and expense for termination benefits at the
earlier of the following dates:
when the entity can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits; and
when the entity recognises costs for a restructuring within the scope of IAS
37 that involves the payment of termination benefits.
327
Measurement
Termination benefits are measured in accordance with the nature of the
employee benefit, that is to say short term benefits, other long term benefits or
post-employment benefits.
the fair value of assets set aside to meet the obligation (if any).
Movements in the amount from one year to the next are recognised in P&L.
328
POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
Section overview
Post-employment benefits
Multi-employer plans
Definitions
Defined contribution plans are post-employment benefit plans under which an
entity pays fixed contributions into a separate entity (a fund) and will have no
legal or constructive obligation to pay further contributions if the fund does not
hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits relating to employee service in
the current and prior periods.
Defined benefit plans are post-employment benefit plans other than defined
contribution plans.
329
The contributions to the fund are invested to earn a return and increase the value
of the fund. When an employee retires, he or she is paid a pension out of the
fund. The amount of pension received by the employee is not pre-determined,
but depends on the size of the employees share of the fund at retirement.
As the name defined contribution implies, the companys obligation to pay a
pension to the employee is limited to the agreed amounts of contribution. The
company is not required to make good any shortfalls if the pension fund does not
have enough assets to pay the pension benefits that the employee would like to
have. In effect, the employee bears the risk of a poor-performing fund, not the
employer.
Accounting treatment: contributions to defined contribution schemes
Accounting for the employers contributions to a defined contribution scheme is
straightforward. Using the accruals concept:
the contributions payable for the reporting period are charged to profit or
loss as an expense (an employee cost) in the statement of profit or loss.
any unpaid contributions at the end of the year will be shown in the
statement of financial position as an accrual/liability and any prepaid
contributions will be shown as an asset (a prepayment).
330
It is very unlikely that the actuarys estimates will be 100% accurate so whenever
the value of the pension fund assets and the employers pension obligations are
measured, the company may find that there is a deficit or a surplus.
When the amount of the employers future pension obligations is more than
the value of the investments in the pension fund, the fund is in deficit.
When the value of the investments in the pension fund is higher than the
value of the employers obligations to make future pension payments, the
fund is in surplus.
When a surplus or deficit occurs an employer might take no action. This would be
the case when the company believes that the actuarial assumptions may not be
true in the short term but will be true over the long term. Alternatively, the
company might decide to eliminate a deficit (not necessarily immediately) by
making additional contributions into the fund.
When the fund is in surplus, the employer might stop making contributions into
the fund for a period of time (and take a pension holiday). Alternatively, in some
jurisdictions the company may withdraw the surplus from the fund for its own
benefit though this is not allowed in Pakistan.
the asset ceiling (which is the present value of any economic benefits
available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future
contributions to the plan).
331
Definition
The present value of a defined benefit obligation is the present value, without
deducting any plan assets, of expected future payments required to settle the
obligation resulting from employee service in the current and prior periods.
The obligation is estimated by an actuary, and is based on actuarial estimates
and assumptions. IAS 19 requires that it must be measured using the projected
unit credit method (you may need to know this term but do not need to apply it)
using a discount rate available on high quality corporate bonds.
Movement for the period
The movements on the defined benefit item are due to:
Note that the benefit paid has no effect as it reduces the plan assets and plan
obligations by the same amount.
Definitions Movements recognised through P&L
Definitions
Current service cost is the increase in the present value of the defined benefit
obligation resulting from employee service in the current period;
Past service cost is the change in the present value of the defined benefit
obligation for employee service in prior periods, resulting from a plan amendment
(the introduction or withdrawal of, or changes to, a defined benefit plan) or a
curtailment (a significant reduction by the entity in the number of employees
covered by a plan).
Net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset) is the change during the
period in the net defined benefit liability (asset) that arises from the passage of
time.
A settlement is a transaction that eliminates all further legal or constructive
obligations for part or all of the benefits provided under a defined benefit plan,
other than a payment of benefits to, or on behalf of, employees that is set out in
the terms of the plan and included in the actuarial assumptions.
332
b.
any change in the effect of the asset ceiling, excluding amounts included in
net interest on the net defined benefit liability (asset).
Actuarial gains and losses are changes in the present value of the defined benefit
obligation resulting from:
a.
b.
Closing
This is used to identify the movement on the defined benefit liability (asset) which
is journalised at step 2
Step 2
Construct the following journal and enter the movement on the defined benefit
liability (asset) and the cash paid to the plan by the company (contributions).
Illustration: Journal
Debit
Profit or loss
Credit
X
X
The above illustration assumes an increase in the liability. This would not be the
case in all examples. (In other words, the movement might be a debit or a credit,
depending on circumstance).
Emile Woolf International
333
Step 3
Identify the profit and loss entries. These comprise:
interest (an interest rate applied to the opening net liability (asset); and
settlement gain/loss
Rs. 000
900
1,850
During 20X6:
Current service cost
Rs. 000
90
150
60
Actuarial assumptions:
Discount rate
10%
Rs. 000
850
1,960
334
31 December
20X6
Rs. 000
1,850
1,960
(900)
(850)
950
1,110
Note that the movement on the defined benefit liability is an increase of Rs.
160,000 (1,110,000 950,000)
Step 2: Construct the journal and fill in the blanks as far as possible
Debit
Credit
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Profit or loss
Other comprehensive income
(remeasurement)
Cash (contributions)
150
160
90
95
185
Credit
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Profit or loss
185
125
150
160
310
335
310
Rs. 000
900
1,850
During 20X6:
Current service cost
Rs. 000
90
150
60
Actuarial assumptions:
Discount rate
10%
Rs. 000
850
1,960
336
1 January
20X6
Rs. 000
31 December
20X6
Rs. 000
1,850
1,960
(900)
(850)
950
1,110
Step 2: Construct the journal and fill in the blanks as far as possible (as before)
Debit
Credit
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Profit or loss
Other comprehensive income
(remeasurement)
Cash (contributions)
150
160
Step 3: Construct a working to identify the movements on the defined benefit net
liability (asset)
Rs. 000
(950)
(95)
150
(90)
0
At start of year
1 Net interest (10% 950,000)
2 Contributions paid (given)
3 Current service cost (given)
4 Benefits paid out (given)
Expected year end position
(985)
(125)
(1,110)
Step 4: Complete the journal by entering in the profit and loss amounts and the
remeasurement from the above working.
Debit
Credit
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
185
125
Cash (contributions)
150
160
310
337
310
Possible complication
In the above illustration the opening defined benefit net liability (asset) was rolled
forward.
IAS 19 requires disclosure of reconciliations of the present value of the defined
benefit obligation and the fair value of the defined benefit assets.
This is done by constructing a similar working to that shown in step 3 above but
including further columns for both the defined benefit liability and the defined
benefit asset.
Example:
Using the facts from the previous example the working would be as follows:
Step 3: Construct a working to identify the movements on the defined benefit net
liability (asset)
Fund position
Liabilityy
Assets
Rs. 000
(1,850)
At start of year
1 Interest expense (10% 1,850,000)
1 Interest earned (10% 900,000)
1 Net interest (10% 950,000)
2 Contributions paid (given)
3 Current service cost (given)
4 Benefits paid out (given)
Expected year end position
Remeasurement (balancing figure)
Actual year end position
Rs. 000
900
(185)
Company
position
Net
Rs. 000
(950)
(90)
60
(60)
(185)
90
(95)
150
(90)
0
(2,065)
1,080
(985)
105
(230)
(125)
(1,960)
850
(1,110)
90
150
Note, that this explains why the benefits paid do not figure in the double entry.
When benefit is paid it reduces both the asset and the liability and in
consequence has no impact on the net position.
However, if the net item is a surplus it is subject to a test which puts a ceiling on
the amount that can be recognised. This is known as the asset ceiling test.
Emile Woolf International
338
the asset ceiling (which is the present value of any economic benefits
available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in future
contributions to the plan).
The approach is exactly the same as before except that net defined benefit
assets recognised at step 1 must be adjusted downwards to the asset ceiling.
Example: Defined benefit accounting with asset ceiling
The following information relates to the defined benefit plan of Company X for the
year to 31 December 20X6.
At 1 January 20X6:
Fair value of the plan assets
Rs. 000
1,150
1,100
40
Rs. 000
125
80
130
Actuarial assumptions:
Discount rate
10%
Rs. 000
1,395
1,315
65
339
31 December
20X6
Rs. 000
1,150
1,395
(1,100)
(1,315)
50
80
(10)
(15)
40
65
Note that the movement on the defined benefit asset is an increase of Rs.
25,000 (65,000 40,000)
Step 2: Construct the journal and fill in the blanks as far as possible (as before)
Debit
Credit
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Profit or loss
Other comprehensive income
(remeasurement)
Cash (contributions)
Defined benefit net asset
80
25
(125)
4
121
121
66
80
25
146
Rs. 000
340
146
pool the assets contributed by various entities that are not under common
control; and
use those assets to provide benefits to employees of more than one entity,
on the basis that contribution and benefit levels are determined without
regard to the identity of the entity that employs the employees.
the contractual agreement or stated policy for charging the net defined
benefit cost or the fact that there is no such policy.
341
IFRIC 14: IAS 19 The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding
requirements and their interaction
3.1 IFRIC 14: IAS 19 The limit on a defined benefit asset, minimum funding
requirements and their interaction
Background
As explained above, IAS 19 limits the measurement of a net defined benefit asset
to the lower of the surplus in the defined benefit plan and the asset ceiling (the
present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the
plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan).
However, IAS 19 does not give guidance on when refunds or reductions in future
contributions should be regarded as available, particularly when a minimum
funding requirement exists.
Minimum funding requirement
The law in a jurisdiction might result in a minimum funding requirement. This is a
requirement for a company to make contributions to fund a defined benefit plan.
The interaction of a minimum funding requirement and the limit in the IAS 19
asset ceiling test has two possible effects:
may give rise to a liability if the contributions required under the minimum
funding requirement will not be available to the entity once they have been
paid (either as a refund or as a reduction in future contributions). The
minimum funding requirement becomes onerous
342
Issues
The issues addressed by IFRIC 14:
can exist whatever the funding level of a plan at the reporting date; but
Any such right should be measured as the amount of the surplus at the reporting
date that the entity has a right to receive as a refund, less any associated costs.
Economic benefit available as a reduction in future contributions:
Economic benefit available as a reduction in future contributions is measured
with reference to the amount that the entity would have been required to pay had
there been no surplus. This is represented by the future IAS 19 service cost.
There are three situations to consider:
whether the minimum funding requirement may give rise to a liability; and
the present value of the future service cost to the entity (excluding any part
borne by employees) for each year over the shorter of the expected life of
the plan and the expected life of the entity
343
1,200
(1,100)
100
nil
100
The amounts in the plan will be available for refund in the future so there
is no need to recognise a liability in respect of the minimum funding
requirement.
344
1,200
(1,100)
100
(100)
nil
(200)
(200)
The amounts in the plan are not available for refund in the future so
there a liability in respect of the minimum funding requirement is
required.
345
1,200
(1,100)
100
(40)
60
(80)
(20)
The plan rules allow for a refund of 60% of a surplus. Therefore 40% is
not refundable.
X Limited must recognise a liability of Rs. 80m (40% of Rs. 200m). This
is netted against the defined benefit asset of Rs. 60m that would have
been recognised in the absence of the minimum funding requirements.
The amounts in the plan are not available for refund in the future so a
liability in respect of the minimum funding requirement is required.
(20)
200
180
Payment of the MFR results in a defined benefit net asset of Rs. 180m.
This is 60% of the original asset of Rs. 100m and the cash introduced
(Rs. 200m) as a result of the MFR.
346
A defined benefit net liability (indicating a shortfall) might be turned into a net
asset by a minimum funding requirement.
Example: Recognition of liability for a minimum funding requirement
X Limited has a post-employment plan subject to a minimum funding
requirement (MFR) as a result of which it has a statutory obligation to contribute
Rs. 300m to the plan as at the reporting date.
The plan rules allow for the refund of 60% of any IAS 19 surplus arising.
Year-end valuation of the plan is set out below:
2015
Rs. m
Market value of plan assets
1,000
(1,100)
(100)
(80)
(180)
Payment of the 300 will change the deficit of 100 into a surplus of 200
of which only 120 (60%) is refundable. Therefore, Rs. 80m (40% of Rs.
200m) must be recognised as a liability resulting in a total defined
benefit liability of Rs. 180m.
The impact of paying the MFR amount is as follows:
2015
Rs. m
Defined benefit net liability
(180)
300
120
Payment of the MFR results in a defined benefit net asset of Rs. 120m.
This is 60% of the surplus that will come into existence when the amount
is paid.
347
any existing shortfall for past service on the minimum funding basis; and
the estimated future service cost in each period less the estimated
minimum funding requirement contributions that would be required for
future service in those periods if there were no prepayment as described
above.
1,000
(1,000)
(244)
(244)
The liability for the shortfall is Rs. 300m and this should be recognised
as a liability. However, this is reduced by the PV of the economic benefit
available in the form of a reduction in future contributions of Rs. 56m.
348
CHAPTER
14
349
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
350
INTRODUCTION
Section overview
Introduction
Scope
Recognition
1.1 Introduction
IFRS 2 Share-based payment explains the accounting treatment for share-based
payment transactions.
Definition
A share-based payment transaction is defined as a transaction in which an entity:
a.
b.
1.2 Scope
Included in scope
The IFRS applies to share-based payment transactions in which an entity
acquires or receives goods or services unless the transaction is specifically
excluded from its scope.
Excluded from the scope
Transfers of an entitys equity instruments by its shareholders to parties that have
supplied goods or services to the entity when such a transfer is clearly for a
purpose other than payment for goods or services supplied (in which case it is
within the scope of IFRS 2)
Transactions with an employee (or other party) in their capacity as a shareholder.
Transactions where equity instruments are issued in exchange for control of an
acquiree in a business combination.
Share-based payment transactions in which the entity receives or acquires goods
or services under a contract to buy or sell a non-financial item that is within the
scope of IFRS on financial instruments. (IAS 32 Presentation and IAS 39
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement).
351
shares; and,
share options;
a cash amount based on the price (or value) of the entitys shares or
other equity instruments, or
IFRS 2 uses the generic term equity instruments. In most cases the equity
instruments in question are either shares or share options.
IFRS 2 uses the term fair value in a way that differs in some respects from the
IFRS 13 definition. When applying IFRS 2, fair value is measured in accordance
with the guidance in IFRS 2 not that in IFRS 13.
1.4 Recognition
Goods and services must be recognised when the goods and services are
received.
This might result in the recognition of an asset or expense depending on the
nature of the transaction. If the goods or services received or acquired in a sharebased payment transaction do not qualify for recognition as assets (determined
by rules in other standards), they must be recognised as expenses:.
352
If the employee is rewarded with a cash bonus, the cost of the cash bonus
would be included in total employment costs and charged as an expense in
the relevant accounting period.
A problem in the past with accounting for share options was that although
share options are a similar type of reward for service, the cost of the
options were not charged as an expense in the statement of profit or loss.
353
Introduction
Measurement date
2.1 Introduction
When an entity acquires goods or receives services it must measure them at fair
value with a corresponding increase in equity.
This raises several issues:
Transactions with
employees
At grant date
As the service is
rendered over the
vesting period
As the service is
rendered over the
vesting period
Vesting conditions
354
(there is a presumption
that the services have
been received in full)
this uses the fair value of the goods and services themselves;
those rare cases in which the fair value of goods and services
received cannot be estimated reliably; and,
it must be used:
the grant date for transactions with employees (and others providing similar
services);
the date on which goods are obtained or services received for transactions
with parties other than employees (and those providing similar services).
355
Options
The fair value of options granted is measured at the market price of traded
options with similar terms and conditions.
In most cases there will not be a traded option with similar terms and conditions
because the options granted are subject to terms and conditions that do not
apply to traded options. For example, typically, employee share options are:
non-transferable and
Fair value is then estimated by applying an option pricing model, for example:
a binomial model.
In applying the model the entity must take into account all relevant factors. These
include:
356
Introduction
Vesting conditions
Recognition when there are changes in estimates over the vesting period
Market conditions
3.1 Introduction
Often, when equity instruments are granted they are subject to conditions that
must be satisfied before the counterparty becomes unconditionally entitled to the
instrument.
The period during which the vesting conditions are met is called the vesting
period.
No vesting conditions
If the counterparty is not required to complete a specified period of service before
becoming unconditionally entitled to the equity instruments they are said to vest
immediately.
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the entity must presume that services
rendered by the counterparty as consideration for the equity instruments have
been received.
In this case the entity must recognise the services received in full on the grant
date.
non-market conditions
357
Market conditions
Non-market conditions
Definition
Examples
Increase in profitability
to a specified amount.
Launch of a new
product.
Probability of meeting
the condition is a
measurement attribute.
Probability of meeting
the condition is a
recognition attribute.
Probability of meeting
the condition is taken
into account when
measuring the fair value
of the instrument at the
grant date.
Probability of meeting
the condition plays no
part in measuring the
fair value of the
instrument at the grant
date.
Subsequent changes in
the probability of
meeting the condition
have no impact and are
ignored.
Subsequent changes in
the probability of
meeting the condition
have no impact and are
ignored.
Probability of meeting
the condition is a
measurement attribute.
Probability of meeting
the condition is a
recognition attribute.
Probability of meeting
the condition is taken
into account when
measuring the fair value
of the instrument at the
grant date.
Probability of meeting
the condition plays no
part in measuring the
fair value of the
instrument at the grant
date.
Subsequent changes in
the probability of
meeting the condition
have no impact and are
ignored.
Subsequent changes in
the probability of
meeting the condition
are taken into account in
estimating the expense
to be recognised.
358
Achieving quality
improvement.
For clarity
A market condition is any condition that relates to share price. Any other type of
condition is non-market.
For example, a performance condition might be that the shares will vest as long
as an employee stays with the company for three years from the grant date and
the share price increases by 20% in this period.
The probability of achieving a market condition is taken into account when
estimating the fair value of the equity instrument granted. Subsequent changes in
this probability play no part in the recognition.
For clarity, this means that an option may not vest due to failure to meet the
market condition but an expense is recognised as if the condition had been met.
359
Dr
200,000
Rs. 200,000
Cr
200,000
Rs.
200,000
400,000
600,000
3.4 Recognition when there are changes in estimates over the vesting period
The above example is based on the assumption that there is no change in the
estimate of the number of leavers over the vesting period and that the estimate
turns out to be correct. This is rarely the case. A number of variables might
change the estimated total expense at each year-end including:
At each year end an entity must make the best available estimate of the
number of equity instruments expected to vest taking account of nonmarket vesting conditions (including service conditions and non-market
performance conditions).
The number of shares is then valued using the fair value at the grant date.
Step 2: The entity then estimates the fraction of this total amount that relates to
the vesting period to date. For example, if the total expected expense by the end
of the 3 year vesting period is Rs.1,500,000 and it is the end of the second year,
then only Rs. 1,000,000 (2/3 of the total) relates to the vesting period to date.
Step 3: The annual expense is the calculated by comparing the total that relates
to the vesting period to date to the amount previously recognised.
The difference is recognised as an expense:
On rare occasions the process might show that the total expense relating to the
vesting period to date is smaller than that previously recognised. In that case the
previously recognised expense is reversed as follows:
Illustration: Equity-settled share-based payment reversal of expense
Debit
X
Equity
Statement of profit or loss
Credit
X
At the vesting date the actual number of equity instruments that vest (or that
would have vested except for the failure of a market condition) is the basis for the
overall cumulative charge (and the corresponding balance in equity).
360
Rs.
200,000
nil
Year 1 expense
31 December Year 2
200,000
X Limited estimates that only 15% of employees will leave over the vesting period
(including those who have actually left in years 1 and 2).
The expense recognised at the end of year 2 is as follows:
Year 2 expense
(85% u 500) employees u 100 options u Rs.15 u 2/3
Amount previously recognised
Year 2 expense
31 December Year 3
Rs.
425,000
(200,000)
225,000
Rs.
627,000
(425,000)
Year 3 expense
202,000
361
Practice question
b.
c.
At the grant date X Limited estimates that the fair value of each share is Rs. 50.
31 December Year 1
Earnings have grown by 16% therefore the shares do not vest at this date.
X Limited makes the following estimates:
362
a)
earnings will increase at 16% in the next year with the result that the
shares are expected to vest at the next year-end (because the average
growth would be over 15%).
b)
Rs.
2,250,000
nil
Year 1 expense
2,250,000
b)
Rs.
3,000,000
(2,250,000)
750,000
31 December Year 3
Earnings have grown by 15% resulting in an average growth rate of 13.7% ((16%
+ 10% + 15%)/3 years) so the shares vest.
There are 8 directors who receive shares.
Year 3 expense
8 directors u 10,000 u Rs. 50 u 3/3
Amount previously recognised
Year 3 expense
Rs.
4,000,000
(3,000,000)
1,000,000
363
Each director will receive 5,000 share options if profit grows by an average
of 10% to 15% per annum over the 3 year period.
b)
c)
At the grant date X Limited estimates that the fair value of each share is Rs. 50.
31 December Year 1
Profit has grown by 17% in Year 1.
X Limited makes the following estimates:
a)
Profit will continue to increase by at least 16% over the vesting period.
b)
9 directors are expected to be with the company at the end of the vesting
period.
Year 1 expense
9 directors u 10,000 u Rs. 50 u 1/3
Rs.
1,500,000
nil
Year 1 expense
1,500,000
364
b)
9 directors are expected to be with the company at the end of the vesting
period.
Year 2 expense
9 directors u 15,000 u Rs. 50 u 2/3
Rs.
4,500,000
(1,500,000)
Year 2 expense
3,000,000
31 December Year 3
Profit grew by 18% in Year 3 giving an average growth of 18.3% (17% + 23%
+18%/3 years). Therefore each director receives 10,000 share options.
There are 8 directors who receive shares.
Year 3 credit
8 directors u 10,000 u Rs. 50 u 3/3
Rs.
4,000,000
(4,500,000)
(500,000)
500,000
500,000
365
Rs.
1,200,000
nil
Year 1 expense
1,200,000
31 December Year 2
9 directors are expected to be with the company at the end of the vesting period.
The expense recognised at the end of year 2 is as follows:
Year 2 expense
9 directors u 10,000 options u Rs. 40 u 2/3
Amount previously recognised
Rs.
2,400,000
(1,200,000)
Year 2 expense
1,200,000
31 December Year 3
8 directors are still employed by the company.
The share price condition is not met.
The expense recognised at the end of year 3 is as follows:
Year 3 expense
8 directors u 10,000 options u Rs. 40 u 3/3
Amount previously recognised
Year 3 expense
Rs.
3,200,000
(2,400,000)
800,000
366
Grant with a market performance condition where the date on which the target is
achieved might vary
If a grant of share options is conditional on staying with an entity until a market
performance condition is achieved the time taken to achieve the target could
vary.
The length of the expected vesting period is estimated at grant date and is not
revised subsequently.
Example: Performance condition where the length of the vesting period could
vary
X Limited is a company with a 31 December year end.
1 January Year 1
X Limited grants 10,000 shares to each of its 10 directors on condition that they
remain with the company in the vesting period and subject to the following
performance condition.
The shares vest when the share price increases by 50% above its value at the
grant date. It is estimated that this will occur in 4 years after the grant date.
At the grant date X Limited estimates that the fair value of each share is Rs. 50.
X Limited estimates that all 10 directors will remain with the firm.
The following amounts will be recognised as an expense in each of the next 4
years.
10 directors u 10,000 options u Rs. 50 u 1/4
Rs. 1,250,000
Note that the date at which the increase in share value is actually
achieved is irrelevant. The original estimate of the length of the vesting
period is not revised. (This is different from cases involving non-market
conditions).
367
Introduction
Modifications that increase the fair value of the equity instruments granted
Cancellation
4.1 Introduction
The terms and conditions upon which an option was granted may be modified
subsequently. For example, the entity might reduce the exercise price of options
granted to employees (i.e. reprice the options), which increases the fair value of
those options.
Any changes to the terms and conditions on which the options were granted must
be taken into account when measuring the services received.
Background
As a minimum an entity must recognise services received measured at the grant
date fair value of the equity instruments granted, unless those equity instruments
do not vest because of failure to satisfy a non-market vesting condition.
In addition, the entity must recognise the effects of modifications that increase
the total fair value of the share-based payment arrangement or are otherwise
beneficial to the employee. In other words, modifications that are unfavourable
for employees are ignored while favourable modifications are accounted for.
4.2 Modifications that increase the fair value of the equity instruments granted
The entity must calculate the incremental fair value of the equity instruments
brought about by the modification.
This incremental fair value is included in the measurement of the amount
recognised for services received as consideration for the equity instruments
granted.
The incremental fair value granted is calculated as the difference between the
following as at the date of the modification:
that of the original equity instrument, both estimated as at the date of the
modification.
When a modification occurs during the vesting period the incremental fair value
granted is included in the measurement of the amount recognised over the period
from the modification date until the date when the equity instruments vest. This is
in addition to the amount based on the grant date fair value of the original equity
368
Rs.
100,000
nil
Year 1 expense
100,000
1 July Year 2
X Limiteds share price collapsed early in Year 2.
On 1 July Year 2 X Limited modified the share option scheme by reducing the
exercise price to Rs. 15.
The fair value of an option was Rs. 2 immediately before the price reduction and
Rs. 11 immediately after.
31 December Year 2
X Limited estimates that the options will vest with 20 managers.
The expense recognised at the end of year 2 is as follows:
Year 2 expense
Original grant
20 managers u 1,000 options u Rs. 20 u 2/4
Modification
20 managers u 1,000 options u (Rs. 11 Rs. 2) u 0.5/2.5*
Rs.
200,000
36,000
236,000
(100,000)
Year 2 expense
136,000
* At the date of the modification there were 6 months to the year-end and
2 years and 6 months to the vesting date
369
Rs.
300,000
108,000
408,000
(236,000)
Year 3 expense
172,000
Year 4 expense
Original grant
20 managers u 1,000 options u Rs. 20 u 4/4
Modification
20 managers u 1,000 options u (Rs. 11 Rs. 2) u 2.5/2.5
Amount previously recognised
Amount previously recognised
Rs.
580,000
(408,000)
Year 4 expense
172,000
400,000
180,000
In summary, the original grant is accounted for as if nothing had happened and
the modification results in a new expense. The annual expenses could have been
calculated as follows:
Example: Modification reduction of exercise price
All facts as above.
Original grant expense in years 1 to 4
20 managers u 1,000 options u Rs. 20 u 1/4
100,000
Rs.
36,000
Rs.
Summary
Original grant
Modification
Annual expense
Rs.
72,000
Year 1
100,000
Year 2
100,000
Year 3
100,000
Year 4
100,000
100,000
36,000
72,000
72,000
136,000
172,000
172,000
370
Rs.
5,000
Rs.
5,000
Summary
Original grant
Modification
Annual expense
Year 1
5,000
Year 2
5,000
Year 3
5,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
10,000
10,000
4.4 Modifications that decrease the total fair value of the share-based
arrangement
In effect such modifications are ignored. The entity must continue to account for
the services received as consideration for the equity instruments granted as if
that modification had not occurred.
371
Rs.
2,000
Exxpense in year 2
1 u 1,000 options u Rs. 10 u 2/4
Amount previously recognised
Rs.
5,000
(2,000)
Year 2 expense
3,000
Exxpense in year 3
1 u 1,000 options u Rs. 10 u 3/4
Amount previously recognised
Rs.
7,500
(5,000)
Year 3 expense
2,500
Exxpense in year 4
1 u 1,000 options u Rs. 10 u 4/4
Amount previously recognised
Year 4 expense
Rs.
10,000
(7,500)
2,500
372
4.5 Cancellation
A cancellation is accounted for as an acceleration of vesting. The amount that
would otherwise have been recognised over the vesting period is recognised
immediately.
Example: Cancellation
X Limited is a company with a 31 December year-end.
1 January Year 1
X Limited grants 100 options to each of its 500 employees.
Each grant is conditional upon the employee working for X Limited over the next
five years.
The grant date fair value of each option is Rs. 10.
31 December Year 1
X Limited expects 80% of employees to leave over the vesting period.
The expense recognised at the end of year 1 is as follows:
Year 1 expense
(80% u 500 employees) u 100 options u Rs. 10 u 1/5
Amount previously recognised
Rs.
80,000
nil
Year 1 expense
80,000
31 December Year 2
X Limited expects 80% of employees to leave over the vesting period
The expense recognised at the end of year 2 is as follows:
Year 2 expense
(80% u 500 employees) u 100 options u Rs. 10 u 2/5
Rs.
160,000
(80,000)
Year 2 expense
80,000
Year 3
X Limited cancelled the scheme when 460 employees were still in the scheme.
The expense recognised at the end of year 3 is as follows:
Year 3 expense
460 u 100 options u Rs. 10 u 5/5
Rs.
460,000
(160,000)
Year 3 expense
300,000
373
3,000
nil
Year 1 expense
3,000
Rs.
Debit
3,000
Credit
3,000
Year 2 expense
Amount to be recognised by end of year 2:
1,000 options u Rs.9 u 2/2
Amount previously recognised
Rs.
9,000
(3,000)
Year 2 expense
6,000
Debit
6,000
6,000
Credit
374
12,000
the net fair value of the cancelled equity instruments which is:
x
Rs.
2,000
Rs.
2,500
Summary
Original grant
Modification
Annual expense
Year 1
2,000
Year 2
2,000
Year 3
2,000
Year 4
2,000
2,000
2,000
2,500
2,500
4,500
4,500
375
Rs.
2,000
8,000
(2,000)
Year 2 expense
6,000
Rs.
4,000
Summary
Original grant
Year 1
2,000
8,000
Modification
2,000
8,000
Annual expense
376
Year 2
Rs.
Year 3
Year 4
4,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
Introduction
5.1 Introduction
A cash-settled share-based payment transactions is where an entity incurs a
liability for goods and services and the settlement amount is based on the price
(or value) of the entitys shares or other equity instruments.
The basic rules are:
The liability incurred is measured at its fair value at each reporting date until
it is settled. (There is no locking of fair value at grant date).
Any change in the fair value of the liability is recognised in profit or loss.
In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the entity must presume that the
services rendered by the employees in exchange for the share appreciation
rights have been received
The entity must recognise immediately the services received and a liability
to pay for them.
377
the terms and conditions on which the share appreciation rights were
granted, and
If the share appreciation rights granted are conditional upon the employees
remaining in the entitys employ for the next three years and the employees have
completed only one years service at the reporting date, the entity must measure
the fair value of the liability at the reporting date and multiplying the resulting
amount by one-third.
Example: Cash-settled share-based payment transaction
X Limited is a company with a 31 December year end.
1 January Year 1
X Limited grants 100 cash share appreciation rights (SARs) to each of its 500
employees.
Each grant is conditional upon the employee working for X Limited over the next
three years.
Further information
Actual leavers
Estimate of further
in the year
leavers in the future
Year 1
20
40
Year 2
30
30
Year 3
25
The entity estimates the fair value of the SARs at the end of each year in which a
liability exists as shown below.
Year
Fair value
1
15
2
18
3
20
4
23
5
25
As at 31 December Year 5 the employees had not exercised their rights to receive
cash.
The number of employees whose interest is expected to vest and whose interest
does is as follows:
Number of employees whose interest is expected to vest
Year 1
Year 2
Number at grant date
500
500
Number of leavers in year 1
20
20
Number of leavers in year 2
30
Number of leavers in year 3
Expected future number of leavers
40
30
Total expected leavers
Actual leavers
(60)
Expected to vest
Actually vest
440
Year 3
500
20
30
25
(80)
(75)
420
425
378
Rs.
nil
220,000
Liability c/f:
440 employees (W) u 100 options u Rs.15 u 1/3
220,000
31 December Year 2
Year 2 expense
Liability b/f
Year 2 expense (balancing figure)
Liability c/f:
420 employees (W) u 100 options u Rs.18 u 2/3
Rs.
220,000
284,000
504,000
31 December Year 3
Year 3 expense
Liability b/f
Rs.
504,000
346,000
850,000
31 December Year 4
Year 4 expense
Liability b/f
Year 4 expense (balancing figure)
Liability c/f:
425 employees (W) u 100 options u Rs.23 u 3/3
Rs.
850,000
127,500
977,500
31 December Year 5
Year 5 expense
Liability b/f
Year 5 expense (balancing figure)
Liability c/f:
425 employees (W) u 100 options u Rs.25 u 3/3
379
Rs.
977,500
85,000
1,062,500
The liability is reduced as the company pays out cash to employees who exercise
their rights.
Example: Cash-settled share-based payment transaction
X Limited is a company with a 31 December year end.
1 January Year 1
X Limited grants 100 cash share appreciation rights (SARs) to each of its 500
employees.
Each grant is conditional upon the employee working for X Limited over the next
three years.
Further information
Actual leavers
Estimate of further
in the year
leavers in the future
Year 1
20
40
Year 2
30
30
Year 3
25
The fair values of the SARs at the end of each year in which a liability exists and
the intrinsic values of the SARs (which equals the cash paid to the employees) are
shown below.
Year
Fair value
Intrinsic value
1
15
2
18
3
20
16
4
23
22
5
25
24
Employees cashed in their SARs as follows:
Year
Employees
3
100
4
125
5
200
The number of employees whose interest is expected to vest and whose interest
does vest is as before (shown in the previous example).
380
Rs.
nil
220,000
Liability c/f:
440 employees u 100 options u Rs.15 u 1/3
220,000
31 December Year 2
Year 2 expense
Liability b/f
Year 2 expense (balancing figure)
Liability c/f:
420 employees u 100 options u Rs.18 u 2/3
Rs.
220,000
284,000
504,000
31 December Year 3
Year 3 expense
Liability b/f
Rs.
504,000
(160,000)
306,000
650,000
31 December Year 4
Year 4 expense
Liability b/f
Rs.
650,000
(275,000)
85,000
460,000
31 December Year 5
Year 5 expense
Liability b/f
Rs.
460,000
(480,000)
20,000
0
Note: The total expense over the 5 year period is equal to the cash paid.
381
382
Year 4
425
100
125
Year 5
425
100
125
200
(100)
(225)
(425)
325
200
Introduction
6.1 Introduction
Some employee share-based payment arrangements give the employees (or the
employer) the right to choose to receive (or pay) cash instead of shares or
options, or instead of exercising options.
The standard contains different accounting methods for cash-settled and equitysettled share-based payment transactions. Where there is a choice of
settlement, it is necessary to determine which accounting method should be
applied.
This depends on whether:
The entity must measure the fair value of the compound financial instrument at
grant date identifying a value to both components.
The goods or services received or acquired in respect of each component of the
compound financial instrument are accounted for separately.
For the debt component, the goods or services acquired, and a liability to
pay for those goods or services are recognised as they are supplied in the
same way as other cash-settled share-based payment transactions.
For the equity component (if any) the goods or services received and an
increase in equity are recognised as they are supplied in the same way as
other equity-settled share-based payment transactions.
Transactions where the fair value of goods and services is measured directly
This category will not include transactions with employees.
383
The equity component is measured as the difference between the fair value of
the goods or services received and the fair value of the debt component, at the
date when the goods or services are received. In other words, the equity
component is the residual amount.
The liability and equity component are measured at the date the goods and
services are received for transactions where the direct method applies.
Therefore, there is no subsequent remeasurement of the equity component (as
no further goods and services are received). However, the liability component is
remeasured as it is usually linked to a share value which will change over time.
Date of settlement
The liability is remeasured at its fair value at the date of settlement.
384
Machine
Liability (40,000 shares u Rs. 12)
Equity (balance)
Cr
480,000
20,000
30 June Year 1
Statement of profit or loss
Liability:
(40,000 shares u Rs. 15) Rs. 480,000
Dr
120,000
Cr
120,000
31 December
Dr
Liability:
(40,000 shares u Rs. 13) Rs. 600,000
Cr
80,000
80,000
Liability
Cash
Cr
520,000
Liability
Equity
Cr
520,000
385
Rs.
3
15
Compound instrument
18
386
Rs.
nil
600,000
Liability c/f:
(75% u 600) employees u 200 shares u Rs. 20 u 1/3
600,000
Rs.
nil
90,000
90,000
Dr
690,000
Cr
600,000
90,000
31 December Year 2
The fair value of the liability component is estimated at Rs. 25.
X Limited expects 80% of its employees will qualify to receive the compensation
Year 2 expense re liability
Liability b/f
Year 2 expense (balancing figure)
Rs.
600,000
1,000,000
Liability c/f:
(80% u 600) employees u 200 shares u Rs. 25 u 2/3
1,600,000
Rs.
90,000
102,000
192,000
Dr
Cr
1,102,000
1,000,000
102,000
387
Rs.
1,600,000
1,400,000
Liability c/f:
500 employees u 200 shares u Rs. 30 u 3/3
3,000,000
Rs.
192,000
108,000
300,000
Dr
1,508,000
Cr
1,400,000
108,000
Settlement
31 December payment if settled in cash
Dr
520.000
Liability
Cash
Cr
520,000
Liability
Equity
Cr
520,000
388
6.3 Share-based payment transactions in which the entity has the choice of
settlement
Where an obligation exists
The entity must determine whether it has a present obligation to settle in cash
and account for the share-based payment transaction accordingly.
The entity has a present obligation to settle in cash if the choice of settlement in
equity instruments
Where an obligation exists, the entity must account for the transaction according
to the rules applied to cash-settled share-based payment transactions.
Where there is no obligation
Where an obligation does not exist the entity must account for the transaction
according to the rules applied to equity-settled transactions.
In this case the entity may still decide to settle in cash at the settlement date.
If the entity elects to settle in cash, the cash payment is accounted for as
the repurchase of an equity interest, i.e. as a deduction from equity.
There is a special rule to amend the above where the entity elects the settlement
alternative with the higher fair value, as at the date of settlement. If this is the
case the entity must recognise an additional expense for the excess value given:
If cash is paid and the fair value of this is greater than the fair value of the
shares that could have been issued in settlement the difference must be
taken to profit.
If shares are issued in settlement and they have a fair value greater than
that of the cash alternative the difference must be taken to profit.
389
Rs.
nil
1,088,000
Liability c/f:
(80% u 1,200) employees u 200 shares u Rs. 17 u 1/3
1,088,000
31 December Year 2
Year 2 expense re liability
Liability b/f
Year 2 expense (balancing figure)
Rs.
1,088,000
1,216,000
Liability c/f:
(90% u 1,200) employees u 200 shares u Rs. 16 u 2/3
2,304,000
31 December Year 3
Year 3 expense re liability
Liability b/f
Year 3 expense (balancing figure)
Rs.
2,304,000
696,000
Liability c/f:
1,000 employees u 200 shares u Rs. 15 u 3/3
3,000,000
Liability
Cash
Cr
3,000,000
Liability
Equity
Cr
3,000,000
390
Rs.
nil
1,152,000
1,152,000
31 December Year 2
Year 2 expense re liability
Equity balance b/f
Year 2 expense (balancing figure)
Rs.
1,152,000
1,440,000
2,592,000
31 December Year 3
Year 3 expense re liability
Equity balance b/f
Year 3 expense (balancing figure)
Rs.
2,592,000
1,008,000
3,600,000
Dr
3,600,000
Cr
3,600,000
Equity
Retained earnings
Cash
Cr
600,000
3,000,000
391
DISCLOSURES
Section overview
Disclosures about effect on profit or loss for the period and financial position
7.1 Disclosures about nature and extent of share based payment arrangements
Underlying principle
An entity must disclose information that enables users of the financial statements
to understand the nature and extent of share-based payment arrangements that
existed during the period.
To give effect to this principle an entity must disclose at least the following:
vesting requirements;
the number and weighted average exercise prices of share options for each
of the following groups of options:
x
for share options exercised during the period, the weighted average share
price at the date of exercise. If options were exercised on a regular basis
throughout the period, the entity may instead disclose the weighted
average share price during the period.
for share options outstanding at the end of the period, the range of exercise
prices and weighted average remaining contractual life. If the range of
exercise prices is wide, the outstanding options shall be divided into ranges
that are meaningful for assessing the number and timing of additional
shares that may be issued and the cash that may be received upon
exercise of those options.
392
7.3 Disclosures about effect on profit or loss for the period and financial position
Underlying principle
An entity must disclose information that enables users of the financial statements
to understand the effect of share-based payment transactions on the entitys
profit or loss for the period and on its financial position.
To give effect to this principle an entity must disclose at least the following:
the total expense recognised for the period arising from share-based
payment transactions in which the goods or services received did not
qualify for recognition as assets and hence were recognised immediately
as an expense, including separate disclosure of that portion of the total
expense that arises from transactions accounted for as equity-settled
share-based payment transactions;
the total intrinsic value at the end of the period of liabilities for which
the counterpartys right to cash or other assets had vested by the end
of the period (e.g. vested share appreciation rights).
393
31 December Year 1
Rs.
Expected outcome (at grant date value)
500 85% 100 Rs.15
Equity
637,500
1/3
Year 1 charge
212,500
Accumulated in equity
31 December Year 2
212,500
Rs.
660,000
2/3
440,000
(212,500)
Year 2 charge
227,500
Accumulated in equity
31 December Year 3
440,000
Rs.
664,500
(440,000)
Year 3 charge
224,500
Accumulated in equity
664,500
394
CHAPTER
15
Financial instruments:
Recognition and measurement
Contents
1
395
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 30
B (a) 44
B (a) 47
396
Background
Definitions
Derivatives
Using derivatives
1.1 Background
The rules on financial instruments are set out in four accounting standards:
Comment
Scope
No change.
Recognition
No change.
Measurement on
initial recognition
No change.
Derecognition
No change.
397
Area
Comment
Classification of
financial assets
New rules.
Also note that the classification drives subsequent
measurement.
Classification of
financial liabilities
No change
Measurement
Embedded
derivatives
Impairment
New rules.
Hedge
accounting
New rules.
1.2 Definitions
A financial instrument is a contract that gives rise to both:
cash;
A contractual right:
x
Cash
Shares
Loans
Debentures
398
1.3 Derivatives
A derivative is a financial instrument with all three of the following characteristics:
Categories of derivatives
Derivatives can be classified into two broad categories:
forward contracts
futures
swaps
Options (gives the option buyer a choice over whether or not to exercise his
rights under the contract)
Forward contracts
A forward contract is a tailor-made contract to buy or sell a specified amount of a
specified item (commodity or financial item) on a specified date at a specified
price.
A contract like this will require no initial outlay by the company (it has zero fair
value at the date it is entered into). Over the life of the contract its fair value will
depend on the spot exchange rates and the time to the end of the contract.
Example: Forward contracts
A Pakistani company enters into a 6 month forward contract to buy US $100,000
at a rate of Rs. 160 = $1
This means that the Pakistani company will pay Rs. 16,000,000 to buy $100,000
in 6 months time.
This removes uncertainty for the Pakistani company.
A simple valuation of the forward can be made at any time over the life of the
contract by comparing the contracted rate to the spot rate.
Spot rate at date of valuation
Rs. 150 = $1
Rs. 170 = $1
Rs. 16,000,000
Rs. 16,000,000
Rs. 15,000,000
Rs. 17,000,000
Difference
Rs. 1,000,000
Rs. 1,000,000
a liability
an
n asset
Note that this is a simplification. In practice the time to the end of the contract
would need to be built into the value. This is beyond the scope of the syllabus.
Emile Woolf International
399
Futures
Futures are like forwards but are standardised in terms of amounts, date,
currency, commodity etc. This standardisation means that they can be traded. A
company can enter into a futures contract and then may make a gain or a loss on
the market just like any other traded item.
If a company holds futures they might be an asset or a liability at any particular
date.
Swaps
A swap is an agreement between parties to exchange cash flows related to an
underlying obligation. The most common type of swap is an interest rate swap. In
an interest rate swap, two parties agree to exchange interest payments on the
same notional amount of principal, at regular intervals over an agreed number of
years.
One party might pay interest to the other party at a variable or floating rate, and in
return the other party may pay interest on the same principal at a fixed rate (a
rate that is fixed by the swap agreement).
A swap might be recorded as an asset or liability at any particular date. This
depends on the interaction between the amount that an entity has contracted to
pay out and the amount that it is entitled to receive.
Options
The holder of the option has entered into a contract that gives it the right but not
the obligation to buy (call option) or sell (put option) a specified amount of a
specified commodity at a specified price.
An option differs from a forward arrangement. An option not only offers its
buyer/holder the choice to exercise his rights under the contract, but also the
choice not to enforce the contract terms.
The seller of the option must fulfil the terms of the contract, but only if the option
holder chooses to enforce them.
Holding an option is therefore similar to an insurance policy: it is exercised if the
market price moves adversely. As the option holder has a privileged status
deciding whether or not to enforce the contract terms he is required to pay a
sum of money (a premium) to the option seller. This premium is paid when the
option is arranged, and non-refundable if the holder later decides not to exercise
his rights under the option.
From the point of view of the holder the option will only ever be recorded as an
asset. At initial recognition this would be the amount of the premium.
Subsequently the holder would only exercise the option if it was beneficial to do
so. Therefore it could only ever be an asset.
400
401
Initial measurement
Subsequent measurement
402
(2)
(3)
Loans and receivables. These are assets with fixed payments but are not
quoted in an active market. They include regular bank loans and accounts
receivable (trade receivables). They are not expected to be sold in the near
future.
This category could include loans made to other entities, trade receivables
and investments in bonds and other forms of debt, provided that the other
conditions are met.
(4)
403
(2)
fair value; or
amortised cost.
Fair value.
Gain or loss recognised in the statement of proft
or loss
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Available-for-sale financial
assets
Fair value.
Gain or loss recognised in other comprehensive
income and accumulated in a spearate equity
reserve.
Fair value.
Gain or loss recognised in the statement of proft
or loss
Liabilities measured at
amortised cost
Amortised cost
404
Dr
AFS asset
Cr
X
X
X
405
Dr (Rs.)
30,300
Cr (Rs.)
Cash
30,300
Dr (Rs.)
9,700
Cr (Rs.)
9,700
Dr (Rs.)
Cash
50,000
Cr (Rs.)
40,000
10,000
Cr (Rs.)
9,700
9,700
406
Financial
asset
Financial
liability
as expense
Less: repayments
(X)
(X)
Amortised cost
Interest expense is measured using the effective rate. This is the rate that
matches the amount loaned (borrowed) with the discounted future cash flows
received (paid).
The effective rate is the discount rate that, when applied to the future interest and
redemption cash flows, gives an amount equal to the amount initially recognised
for the financial asset or financial liability. Thus, it results in a net present value of
zero. It is the IRR of all cash flows associated with lending or borrowing.
The interest recognised is calculated by applying the effective rate to the
outstanding balance on the bond at the beginning of the period. The interest
recognised in profit and loss each year is not necessarily the cash paid.
The outstanding balance at the end of a period is the opening balance plus the
interest charge at the effective rate, minus the actual interest payments in the
period.
407
Year
1
2
3
4
Amortised cost
brought
forward
1,000,000
Interest at
5.942%
59,424
1,009,424
1,019,407
1,009,984
59,983
60,577
60,016
(50,000)
(70,000)
(70,000)
240,000
240,000
Cash paid
(50,000)
Amortised cost
carried forward
1,009,424
1,019,407
1,009,984
1,000,000
The bond is initially recorded at cost (Rs. 1,000,000) and by the end of year 1 it
has an amortised cost of Rs. 1,009,424.
The difference is due to the difference in the interest expense recognised in the
statement of profit or loss (Rs. 59,424) and the interest actually paid (Rs.
50,000).
The total interest paid over the four years is Rs. 240,000. However, it is charged
to the profit or loss each year at the effective rate (5.942%) on the outstanding
balance, not as the actual interest paid on the bonds in cash each year.
The investor in the above bond would recognise a financial asset at amortised
cost and recognise interest income in the same amounts as above.
408
Practice question
Rs. 50 million
10%
3 years
Rs. 48 million
11.67%
Required
Calculate the amortised cost of the bond and show the interest income for each
year to maturity.
Practice question
Required
Calculate the amortised cost of the bond and show the interest expense for
each year to maturity.
409
Basic rules
The basic rule of initial recognition was explained in paragraph 2.1 above as a
financial asset or a financial liability should be recognised in the statement of
financial position when the reporting entity becomes a party to the contractual
provisions of the instrument.
The date on which an entity becomes a party to the contractual provisions of a
financial asset purchased under a regular way purchase is the trade date.
However, IAS 39 (IFRS 9) contain an exception to this approach by which an
entity can choose to account for a regular way purchase or sale of financial
assets using either trade date accounting or settlement date accounting.
The same method must be applied consistently for all purchases and sales of
financial assets that are classified in the same way.
Trade date accounting and settlement date accounting
The two methods differ in terms of the timing of recognition and derecognition of
assets.
Trade date
Settlement date
Meaning
Purchases
Sales
410
Fair value
Trade date
Rs. 1,000
Reporting date
Rs. 1,005
Settlement date
Rs. 1,015
Debit
Financial asset
Payable
1,000
31 December
Debit
Financial asset
Credit
1,000
Credit
5 January
Debit
Payable
Cash
1,000
Credit
1,000
Debit
Receivable
5 January
Debit
Financial asset
Receivable
1,015
Credit
5
Credit
10
1,000
411
Fair value
Trade date
Rs. 1,100
Reporting date
Rs. 1,105
Settlement date
Rs. 1,130
Debit
Receivable
Financial asset
1,100
Credit
1,015
85
31 December: No entry
5 January
Debit
Cash
Receivable
1,100
Credit
1,100
85
85
31 December: No entry
5 January
Debit
Cash
1,100
Receivable
Credit
1,100
Note: Under both methods the risks and rewards are transferred on trade
date. Therefore, an entity does not book any gain or loss after trade date.
412
Have the contractual rights to cash flows of the financial asset expired?
x
If the answer is the risks and rewards are neither passed nor
retained (i.e. some are passed but some kept) ask the next
question
Has the asset has been transferred in a way such that risks and rewards of
ownership have neither passed nor been retained but control has been lost.
x
This all sounds very complicated but what it means is that a financial asset is
derecognised if one of three combinations of circumstances occurs:
Emile Woolf International
413
the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset expire; or
the financial asset is transferred and substantially all of the risks and
rewards of ownership pass to the transferee; or
the financial asset is transferred, substantially all of the risks and rewards of
ownership are neither transferred nor retained but control of the asset has
been lost.
Example: Derecognition
ABC collects Rs. 10,000 that it is owed by a customer.
1
Have the contractual rights to cash flows of the financial asset expired?
Yes Derecognise the asset
Dr
Cash
Cr
Rs. 10,000
Receivable
Rs. 10,000
Example: Derecognition
ABC sells Rs. 100,000 of its accounts receivables to a factor and receives an 80%
advance immediately. The factor charges a fee of Rs. 8,000 for the service.
The debts are factored without recourse and a balancing payment of Rs. 12,000
will be paid by the factor 30 days after the receivables are factored.
Answer
1
Have the contractual rights to cash flows of the financial asset expired?
No ask the next question
Cash
Cr
Rs. 80,000
Receivables
Rs. 80,000
In addition ABC has given part of the receivable to the factor as a fee:
Dr
P&L
Cr
Rs. 8,000
Receivables
414
Rs. 8,000
Example: Derecognition
ABC sells Rs. 100,000 of its accounts receivables to a factor and receives an 80%
advance immediately. The factor charges a fee of Rs. 8,000 for the service.
The debts are factored with recourse and a further advance of 12% will be
received by the seller if the customer pays on time.
Answer
1
Have the contractual rights to cash flows of the financial asset expired?
No ask the next question
Cash
Cr
Rs. 80,000
Liability
Rs. 80,000
Being receipt of cash from factor This liability is reduced as the factor
collects the cash.
Dr
Liability
Cr
Rs. X
Receivable
Rs. X
In addition ABC has given part of the receivable to the factor as a fee:
Dr
P&L
Cr
Rs. 8,000
Receivables
Rs. 8,000
415
Repo transactions
Under a repo transaction, a company sells an asset with a condition that the
same asset will be bought at a later date on fixed price.
Such a transaction is, in substance, a loan arrangement rather than a sale. It is a
method of an entity providing collateral for a loan. The rules in IAS 39 (IFRS 9)
result in the transaction being treated as a financing transaction with the
recognition of a liability as the conditions for derecognition of financial assets are
not fulfilled.
Example: Repo
X Limited sold an investment (Rs. 100,000 15% bond carried at amortised cost of
Rs. 103,000) for Rs. 110,000 and simultaneously entered into a contract to buy
the same investment back in two years with a repurchase rate of 20%
The investment had an effective yield (IRR) of 18%.
This transaction should be reflected in Co. As books as follows:
Debit
Transaction date
Cash
Repo liability
Credit
110,000
110,000
15,000
3,540
18,540
22,000
Repo liability
22,000
The movement on the investment and the repo liability is as follows (with
credits being shown in brackets):
Balance b/f
Investment
103,000
Repo
liability
Cash
(110,000)
110,000
Profit or
loss
Year 1:
Income
3,540
Interest expense
Balance b/f
106,540
416
15,000
(18,540)
(22,000)
22,000
(117,000)
Debit
Repo liability
Investment
Credit
15,000
4,177
Interest income Cr
19,177
23,400
Repo liability
23,400
Credit
125,400
125,400
Investment
106,540
Repo
liability
(117,000)
4,177
15,000
(19,177)
Interest expense
(23,400)
23,400
Repurchase of
investment
125,400
Balance b/f
Cash
Profit or
loss
Year 2:
Income
Balance b/f
110,717
(125,400)
417
Rs.
1,000
820
Difference
180
18%
Conclusion:
The terms of the original loan have been substantially modified
Step 2: Account for the substantial modification
Extinguishment of original loan
Recognition of new loan (working)
Dr
1,000
Cr
763
237
418
Rs.
2,000,000
1,840,119
159,881
8%
Conclusion:
The terms of the original loan have not been substantially modified
Step 2: Calculate the new effective yield
Year
Cash flow
Discount
factor at
10%
Present
value at
10%
Discount
factor at
15%
Present
value at
15%
(2,000)
1.000
(2,000)
1,000
(2,000)
100
1.000
100
1,000
100
3,500
0.621
2,173
0.497
1,740
NPV
Using
273
(160)
Interest is recognised at 13% instead of 15% from the date of the modification.
419
Issues addressed
Are an entitys equity instruments issued to extinguish all or part of a financial
liability consideration paid in the context of IAS 39 liability derecognition rules?
How should an entity initially measure the equity instruments issued?
How should the entity account for any difference between the carrying amount of
the liability and the initially measured equity instruments?
Consensus: Are the equity instruments consideration paid
The issue of equity instruments is consideration paid to extinguish all or part of
a financial liability. This leads to the derecognition of the liability.
Consensus: Initial measurement of equity instruments issued
Equity instruments issued must be initially measured at the fair value of those
instruments. If the fair value cannot be reliably measured then the fair value of the
liability extinguished is used instead.
Consensus: Accounting for the difference
The difference between the carrying amount of the liability extinguished and the
consideration paid (fair value of equity instruments issued) must be recognised in
profit or loss. A separate line item or disclosure in the notes is required.
If only a part of the financial liability is extinguished the part of the consideration
allocated to the remaining liability must form part of the assessment as to whether
the remaining liability has been substantially modified.
420
Credit
Rs. 50m
Equity
Rs. 48m
Profit on extinguishment
Rs. 2m
Example: IFRIC 19
1 January Year 1
X Limited borrowed Rs. 25,000,000 on the following terms:
Face value
Rs. 25,000,000
Term of loan
Redemption value
Coupon rate
Effective rate (IRR)
10 years
Rs. 30,000,000
12%
13.08150%
31 December Year 5
X Limited has fallen into financial difficulties and renegotiated the terms of the
loan.
The lender has agreed to extinguish 55% of the loan in exchange for an equity
stake in X Limited.
The terms of the agreement were as follows:
Shares to be issued by X Limited to lender
Rs. 17,000,000
Of which:
Consideration for extinguishment of 55% of the loan
Rs. 16,500,000
Rs. 500,000
14.5%
Under the terms of the modification no interest will be paid on the remaining
amount and a sum of Rs. 30,000,000 will be paid at the end of the term. (5 Years
from now)
Required
Show how X Limited must account for the modification to the terms of the loan.
421
Opening
Interest
Payment
Closing
25,000,000
3,270,375
(3,000,000)
25,270,375
25,270,375
3,305,744
(3,000,000)
25,576,119
25,576,119
3,345,740
(3,000,000)
25,921,860
25,921,860
3,390,968
(3,000,000)
26,312,828
26,312,828
3,442,113
(3,000,000)
26,754,940
Extinguished (55%)
14,715,217
Retained (45%)
12,039,723
Credit
1,784,783
14,715,214
Equity
16,500,000
Rs.
12,039,723
16,724,206
Difference
4,684,483
39%
Conclusion:
The terms of the original loan have been substantially modified
Step 3b: Account for the substantial modification
Debit
Original liability
Statement of profit or loss
Equity
New liability (working)
Credit
12,039,723
3,704,097
500,000
15,243,820
422
Embedded derivatives
two different entities could hold similar derivative positions and therefore
face exactly the same economic exposure, but if the derivative of one
company was embedded in another contract these same economic
exposures would be accounted for differently.
the hybrid is not measured at fair value with changes to P&L; and
its economic characteristics and risks are not closely related to those of the
host.
423
215,000
35,000
424
425
Amortised cost
brought forward
Interest at
5.942%
Cash paid
1,000,000
1,009,424
59,424
59,983
(50,000)
(50,000)
Amortised cost
carried forward
1,009,424
1,019,407
Discount factor
(@5.942%)
0.9439
0.891
39,644
572,022
Recoverable amount
611,666
Carrying amount
1,019,407
Impairment
407,741
Note that the recoverable amount could have been calculated easily as 60% of
the carrying amount:
60% of 1,019,407 = 611,644 (22 difference due to rounding)
Any impairment loss is charged to profit or loss.
426
What is hedging?
Definitions
427
5.2 Definitions
A company can hedge whatever it wants to but, IAS 39 only allows hedge
accounting when certain conditions are satisfied. IAS 39 uses the following
definitions in describing the hedge accounting rules.
Hedged item
Definition
A hedged item is an asset, liability, firm commitment, highly probable forecast
transaction or net investment in a foreign operation that exposes the entity to risk
of changes in fair value or future cash flows and is designated as being hedged.
Hedges of net items cannot qualify for hedge accounting. Suppose a company
whose functional currency was rupees had a 100 asset and an 80 liability. This
company would have a foreign exchange risk exposure on 20. In practice a
company might hedge this 20 position. This cannot qualify for hedge accounting.
Further guidance in IAS 39 limits the risks that can be hedged. A company might
hedge risk components. For example, a company might invest in a foreign
currency, interest bearing bond. The company might hedge the foreign currency
risk and/or the interest rate risk and/or the credit risk of this bond. In each case it
would be allowed to use hedge accounting.
However, this is not the case for non-financial items which must be hedged for
foreign exchange risk or their total risk. For example, a jet fuel manufacturer
might hedge the crude oil cost component of its production costs. This cannot be
hedge accounted under IAS 39.
Hedging instrument
Definition
A hedging instrument is a designated derivative or (for a hedge of the risk of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates only) a designated non-derivative
financial asset or non-derivative financial liability whose fair value or cash flows
are expected to offset changes in the fair value or cash flows of a designated
hedged item.
Hedge accounting is not allowed for hedges where non derivative financial assets
and liabilities are used as hedging instruments except for hedges of foreign
exchange risk.
Hedge accounting is only allowed for hedges involving derivatives external to the
entity. Therefore, if a member of a group takes a derivative position with another
member of the group in order to hedge a risk it may use hedge accounting in its
own financial statements. This hedge accounting must be removed on
consolidation as then the derivative is not external.
428
Hedge effectiveness
Definition
Hedge effectiveness is the degree to which changes in the fair value or cash flows
of the hedged item that are attributable to a hedged risk are offset by changes in
the fair value or cash flows of the hedging instrument.
IAS 39 does not specify methods of measuring effectiveness but does require
that it be measured on every reporting date (at least). Whatever method is used
must be documented and in place before hedge accounting is allowed.
429
The carrying amount of the hedged item is adjusted by the loss or gain on
the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk with the other side of the
entry recognised in profit or loss.
430
Answer
Hedging instrument (gain)
The forward contract gives Entity X the right to sell oil at $100 per barrel but it is
only worth $90 per barrel. This represents a gain of $10 per barrel
Dr
$1,000
P&L
$1,000
P&L
Cr
Inventory
$1,000
$1,000
Note that the hedged item is not fair valued. Its carrying amount is adjusted by
the change in its fair value.
Summary
30th
September 20X1
31st December 20X1:
Fair value change
Derivative
Inventory
Inventory
10,000
Debit/(credit)
Derivative
(asset)
1,000
(1,000)
1,000
1,000
Nil
(1,000)
9,000
P&L
The change in the fair value of the hedging instrument is analysed into
effective and ineffective elements.
431
Derivative
Equity reserve
Profit or loss
Dr
80
Cr
75
5
432
Cr
23
20
3
Accounting on settlement
The income from the sales is 905.
The effective gains on the derivative held in the equity reserve are released to
profit or loss as a reclassification adjustment in other comprehensive income.
The release of the 95 to profit or loss means that the total income from the seat
sales and the effective hedged gains is 1,000. This was the amount of income
that was hedged by the original forward contract.
Summary:
Cash
Previous period
Current period:
Fair value change
Sale of seats
Reclassification
adjustment
Settle forward contract
Debit /(credit)
Derivative
(asset)
OCI
Profit or
loss
80
(75)
(5)
23
(20)
(3)
(905)
95
(95)
(1,008)
905
103
(103)
1,008
The statement of profit or loss includes 1,000 revenue that the company locked
into with the hedging position, plus the gain of 8 (5 + 3) on the ineffective
part of the hedge (= the speculative element of the derivative).
433
OCI (equity
reserve)
10,200
(200)
1 January 20X3
31 December 20X3:
Depreciation (say 10 years)
Transfer from equity:
reclassification adjustment
(1,020)
Profit or
loss)
1,020
20
(20)
1,000
9,180
(180)
434
10,200
(200)
(200)
200
10,000
nil
(1,000)
1,000
1,000
9,000
nil
This is only allowed for non-financial assets and liabilities. Approach one must be
used for financial assets and liabilities.
435
Introduction
6.1 Introduction
Scope
IFRIC 16 applies to hedges of foreign currency risk in a net investment in a
foreign operation where an entity wishes to qualify for hedge accounting under
IAS 39
Background
IAS 39 (IFRS 9) allows hedge accounting of hedges of a net investment in a
foreign operation (subject to satisfying the hedge accounting criteria).
Definitions
Foreign operation: an entity that is a subsidiary, associate, joint venture or branch
of a reporting entity, the activities of which are based or conducted in a country or
currency other than those of the reporting entity.
Net investment in a foreign operation: the amount of the reporting entitys
interest in the net assets of that operation.
Therefore (by definition) hedge accounting of the foreign exchange risk of the net
investment in a foreign operation only applies in financial statements where the
interest in the foreign operation is included as the investing companys share of
its net assets. This means for example that hedge accounting in respect of the
exchange risk associated with an investment in a foreign subsidiary is only
allowed in the consolidated financial statements.
Where there is such a designated hedging relationship the effective part of the
gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognised in other comprehensive
income and accumulated with the foreign exchange differences arising on
translation of the results and financial position of the foreign operation.
Investments in a foreign operation may be held directly or indirectly
IFRIC 16 addresses the following three issues:
The nature of the hedged risk and the amount of a hedged item for which a
hedging relationship may be designated?
436
Further information:
Subsidiary A has external borrowings of $300,000.
Subsidiary C has net assets of $300,000.
Designation of hedged risk
In its consolidated financial statements, the parent designates Subsidiary As
borrowing as a hedge of the /$ exchange risk of its net investment in C.
Accounting
The exchange difference on the retranslation of the net assets of C is recognised
in OCI and accumulated in the currency translation reserve. (IAS 21).
(In effect this is a translation of dollars to pounds and then the pounds into euro).
The exchange gain or loss on the external borrowing is recognised in OCI and
accumulated in the currency translation reserve. (IAS 39/IFRS 9).
(In effect this is a translation of dollars to yen and then the yen into euro).
437
Example:
The following group comprises a parent and 3 100% owned subsidiaries.
The functional currency of each member of the group is shown in brackets.
Further information:
Subsidiary A has external borrowings of $300,000.
Subsidiary C has net assets of $300,000.
Designation of hedged risk
In its consolidated financial statements, the parent designates Subsidiary As
borrowing as a hedge of the /$ exchange risk between subsidiary B and C.
Accounting
The exchange difference on the retranslation of the net assets of C is recognised
in OCI and accumulated in the currency translation reserve. (IAS 21).
(In effect this is a translation of dollars to pounds and then the pounds into euro).
The recognition of the exchange gain or loss arising on the external borrowing is
quite complicated.
Dollars to pounds: Any gain or loss recognised in OCI (applying IAS39/IFRS 9
this is the offset of the hedged risk above).
Pounds to yen: Any gain or loss recognised in P&L (applying IAS 21 for individual
company transactions).
Yen to dollars: Any gain or loss recognised in OCI (IAS 21 for translation
differences arising on consolidation).
The hedged item may be an amount of net assets equal to or less than the
carrying amount of the net assets of the foreign operation.
A forex exposure arising from a net investment in a foreign operation may qualify
for hedge accounting only once in consolidated financial statements.
the cumulative effective gain or loss on the hedging instrument (IAS 39)
438
amortised cost;
the asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold assets
in order to collect contractual cash flows; and
the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to
cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal
amount outstanding.
439
the contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to
cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal
amount outstanding.
Business model
Classification of bond
A Limited
A Limited must
measure the bond at
amortised cost
C Limited must
measure the bond at
fair value through P&L
B Limited
C Limited
B Limited must
measure the bond at
fair value through OCI
440
Equity instruments
Investments in equity are measured at fair value through profit or loss.
However a company can make an irrevocable election at initial recognition to
measure an equity investment at fair value through other comprehensive income
as long as it is not held for trading.
Amortised cost criteria - commentary
The rules try to limit the use of amortised cost to those situations where it best
reflects the substance of the transactions. Therefore it can only be used by a
company whose business model is to make loans and collect future repayments.
A company might sell a loan before its maturity. This does not preclude
classification of loans at amortised cost as long as the companys overall
business model is to hold assets in order to receive contractual cash flows.
On the other hand a company might hold a portfolio of loans in order to profit from
the sale of these assets when market conditions are favourable. In this case the
companys business model is not to hold assets in order to receive contractual
cash flows. The loans in this portfolio must be measured at fair value.
The cash flows received by a company must be solely repayments of the
principal and interest on this principal. An investment in a convertible bond would
not satisfy this criteria as a company might convert it into equity. In that case the
amounts received by the company would not solely be by repayments of principal
or interest.
Overview of classification of financial assets
Method
Which instruments?
Amortised cost
Equity
Derivatives
Loans and receivables that fail the amortised
cost criteria
Loans and receivables that satisfy the amortised
cost criteria but are designated into this category
on initial recognition
441
financial liabilities that might arise when a financial asset is transferred but
this transfer does not satisfy the derecognition criteria.
Examples
Financial asset at
fair value through
profit or loss
Financial asset at
fair value through
OCI
Financial liability at
fair value through
profit or loss
442
Answer
1 January 20X6 The investment is recorded at Rs. 30,300. This is the cost plus
the capitalised transaction costs.
31 December 20X6 The investment is revalued to its fair value of Rs. 40,000.
The gain of Rs. 9,700 is included in other comprehensive income for the year.
11 December 20X7 The journal entry to record the disposal is as follows:
Dr
50,000
Cash
Investment
Statement of profit or loss
Cr
40,000
10,000
443
Introduction
Definitions
Simplified approach
General approach
Credit impairment
8.1 Introduction
Impairment of most non-current assets is covered by IAS 36. IAS 36 operates an
incurred loss model. This means that impairment is recognised only when an
event has occurred which has caused a fall in the recoverable amount of an
asset.
Impairment of financial instruments is dealt with by IFRS 9. IFRS 9 contains an
expected loss model. The expected loss model applies to all debt instruments
(loans, receivables etc.) recorded at amortised cost or at fair value through OCI. It
also applies to lease receivables (IAS 17), contract assets (IFRS 15).
The aim of the expected loss model is that financial statements should reflect the
deterioration or improvement in the credit quality of financial instruments held by
an entity. This is achieved by recognising amounts for the expected credit loss
associated with financial assets.
The rules look complex because they have been drafted to provide guidance to
banks and similar financial institutions on the recognition of credit losses on loans
made. However, there is a simplified regime that applies to other financial assets
as specified in the standard (such as trade receivables and lease receivables).
This section explains the simplified regime in the first instance (which in our view
is more likely to be examined). The section then provides an overview of the
more complicated general regime. This is of great importance to lenders, for
example, banks and similar financial institutions.
8.2 Definitions
Credit loss The difference between all contractual cash flows that are due to an
entity in accordance with the contract and all the cash flows that the entity
expects to receive (i.e. all cash shortfalls), discounted at the original effective
interest rate
Lifetime expected credit losses: The expected credit losses that result from all
possible default events over the expected life of a financial instrument.
12-month expected credit losses: The portion of lifetime expected credit losses
that represent the expected credit losses that result from default events on a
financial instrument that are possible within the 12 months after the reporting date
444
Simplified approach
Must be used
Lease receivables
445
Example:
X Limited has total trade receivables of Rs. 30,000,000.
The trade receivables do not have a significant financing component.
The loss allowance recognised at the end of the previous year was Rs. 500,000.
X Limited has constructed the following provision matrix to calculate expected
lifetime losses of trade receivables.
Current
Default rate
0.3%
1.6%
3.6%
6.6%
10.6%
Required: Calculate the lifetime expected credit loss, show the necessary
double entry to record the loss and state the amounts to be recognised in
the statement of financial position.
Answer
The expected lifetime credit loss is measured as follows:
Gross carrying
amount of trade
receivables
Default rate
Lifetime
expected credit
loss
Rs.
Rs.
Current
15,000,000
0.3
45,000
1 to 30 days
7,500,000
1.6
120,000
31 to 60 days
4,000,000
3.6
144,000
61 to 90 days
2,500,000
6.6
165,000
More than 90
1,000,000
10.6
106,000
30,000,000
580,000
Credit
80,000
Loss allowance
80,000
The trade receivables would be presented at an amount net of this
allowance in the statement of financial position (Rs. 30,000,000 - Rs.
580,000 = Rs. 29,420,000).
446
If there is no significant increase in credit risk the loss allowance for that
asset is remeasured to the 12 month expected credit loss as at that date.
If there is a significant increase in credit risk the loss allowance for that
asset is remeasured to the lifetime expected credit losses as at that date.
This does not mean that the financial asset is impaired. The entity still
hopes to collect amounts due but the possibility of a loss event has
increased.
Credit impairment (the third bullet above) will be dealt with in a separate section.
The first two bullets simply differ in terms of how the expected loss is measured.
There is no difference between the necessary double entry in each case.
Loss allowance for financial assets carried at amortised cost.
Movement on the loss allowance is recognised in profit or loss.
The loss allowance balance is netted against the financial asset to which it relates
on the face of the statement of financial position.
NB: this is just for presentation only; the loss allowance does not reduce the
carrying amount of the financial asset in the double entry system.
447
Example:
1 January 20X1
X Limited has purchased a bond for Rs. 1,000,000.
The bond pays interest at 5% and is to be redeemed at par in 5 years time.
12 month expected credit loss = Rs. 25,000.
31 December 20X1
Interest is collected at its due date.
There is no significant change in credit risk.
12 month expected credit loss = Rs. 30,000.
Required
Show the double entries on initial recognition and at 31 December necessary to
account for the bond and the loss allowance.
Answer
1 January 20X1
Debit
Credit
1,000,000
Cash
1,000,000
25,000
Loss allowance
25,000
50,000
50,000
50,000
5,000
Loss allowance
5,000
448
50,000
60,000
5,000
449
Answer (continued)
The following table summarises the above double entries. Credit entries are shown
as figures in brackets
Cash
Financial
asset
OCI
P&L
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
(1,000)
1,000
(25)
25
1 January 20X1
Purchase of financial asset
Recognition of loss
allowance
31 December 20X1
Interest accrual
50
Interest payment
50
(50)
(50)
1,000
(60)
Movement on loss
allowance
60
(5)
940
30
The balance in OCI for this asset is the fair value adjustment net of the loss
allowance.
450
Example:
Company X invests in a bond.
The bond has an issue value of Rs. 1 million and pays a coupon rate of 5% interest
for two years, then 7% interest for two years (this known as a stepped bond).
Interest is paid annually on the anniversary of the bond issue.
The bond will be redeemed at par after four years.
The effective rate for this bond is 5.942%
At the end of the second year it becomes apparent that the issuer has financial
difficulties and it is estimated that Company X will only receive 60 paisa in the
rupee of the future cash flows.
At the end of year 2 the amortised cost is:
Amortised cost
brought forward
Interest at
5.942%
Cash paid
1,000,000
59,424
(50,000)
Amortised cost
carried forward
1,009,424
1,009,424
59,983
(50,000)
1,019,407
Year
Discount factor
(@5.942%)
Year
3
0.9439
39,644
0.891
572,022
Recoverable amount
611,666
Carrying amount
1,019,407
Impairment
407,741
Note that the recoverable amount could have been calculated easily as 60% of
the carrying amount:
60% of 1,019,407 = 611,644 (22 difference due to rounding)
The impairment loss is charged to profit or loss taking into account the
balance on the loss allowance account already recognised for the asset.
451
Example:
Suppose in the above example there was a loss allowance of Rs. 100,000
recognised on the asset before the impairment event.
The necessary double entries would be as follows:
Debit
Statement of profit or loss
307,741
Loss allowance
100,000
Financial asset
Credit
407,741
452
Embedded derivatives
453
Summary of changes
454
IFRS 9
Hedging instruments
Non derivative financial instrument can only be
used as hedge of foreign exchange risk.
Hedged items
IAS 39 allows components (parts) of financial
This distinction has been
items to be hedged, but not components of non- eliminated.
financial items.
Hedges of components of
non-financial items will
For example hedge accounting can be
qualify for hedge
achieved for a hedge of credit risk in bond but
accounting.
not for a hedge of oil price in jet fuel.
Risk managers often hedge a risk component
for non-financial items.
Companies often hedge net positions but IAS
39 does not allow hedge accounting for these
hedges creating an inconsistency between
hedge accounting and risk management
activity.
No change
455
The amount recognised as income in profit or loss each year is based on the effective
rate of return, but the cash actually received is based on the coupon rate of 10%.
The difference is treated as an adjustment to the carrying value of the investment in the
statement of financial position, which is the amortised cost of the asset.
This is calculated as follows:
Year
Asset value
brought forward
Interest at
11.67%
20X5
20X6
48.00m
48.60m
5.60m
5.65m
20X7
49.25m
5.75m
17m
Cash paid
(5m)
(5m)
(5m)
Asset value
carried forward
48.06m
49.25m
50.00m
15m
Solution
The initial liability is (Rs. 10 million 100.50/100) Rs. 50,000 = Rs. 10,000,000.
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Liability at
start of year
Rs.
10,000,000
10,100,000
10,207,000
10,321,490
Finance
charge at 7%
Rs.
700,000
707,000
714,490
722,510
Interest paid
Rs.
(600,000)
(600,000)
(600,000)
(600,000)
2,844,000
2,400,000
Liability at
end of year
Rs.
10,100,000
10,207,000
10,321,490
10,444,000
The final interest payment of Rs. 722,510 contains a rounding adjustment of Rs. 6.
Note that the difference between the interest charged and the interest paid is because
the final payment of the redemption proceeds has not been shown. This contains a
redemption premium of Rs. 444,000 which has already been recognised as an expense
by the year end.
456
CHAPTER
16
Financial instruments:
Presentation and disclosure
Contents
1 IAS 32: Presentation
2 Interpretations
3 IFRS 7: Disclosure
457
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 25
B (a) 34
B (a) 45
458
Liability or equity?
Compound instruments
Offsetting
Distributable profit
459
Redeemable preference shares are those that the entity has an obligation
to buy back (or the right to buy back) at a future date.
convertible preference shares are those that are convertible at a future date
into another financial instrument, usually into ordinary equity shares of the
entity.
equity; or
IAS 32 states (in a guidance note) that the key factor for classifying preference
shares is the extent to which the entity is obliged to make future payments to the
preference shareholders.
Redemption at the choice of the holder: Since the issuing entity does
not have an unconditional right to avoid delivering cash or another
financial asset there is an obligation. The shares are a financial
liability.
460
is because the terms of the conversion normally allow the bondholder to convert
the bond into shares at a rate that is lower than the market price.
Split accounting for compound instruments
On initial recognition of compound instrument, the credit entry for the financial
instrument must be split into the two component parts, equity and liability.
When convertible bonds are issued they are shown in the statement of financial
position partly as debt finance and partly as equity finance. The question is how
to determine the amount of the issue price that is debt and the amount that is
equity.
The method to use is to calculate the equity element as the residual after
determining the present value of the debt element:
The present value of the interest payments and the redemption value of the
convertible is found using a market interest rate for similar debt finance
which is not convertible (normally a higher interest rate as there is no
conversion element).
Compare this present value to the proceeds of the bond issue to find the
residual equity element.
The bonds should be recorded in the statement of financial position at the date of
issue as follows:
Step 1: Measure the liability component first by discounting the interest
payments and the amount that would be paid on redemption (if not converted) at
the prevailing market interest rate of 8%.
461
31 December
Cash flow
DF (8%)
Rs.
600,000
3.312
1,987,200
10,000,000
0.735
7,350,000
20X1 to 20X4
Interest: 10,000,000 u 6%
20X4:
Repayment of principle
Value of debt element
9,337,200
10,000,000
662,800
Cr
10,000,000
Liability
9,337,200
Equity
662,800
The liability component is measured at amortised cost in the usual way at each
subsequent reporting date.
Example (continued): Subsequent measurement of the debt element of the
convertible bond
Amortised
cost at start
of the year
Interest at
effective rate
(8%)
Cash flow
(interest
actually paid
at 6%)
20X1
9,337,200
746,976
(600,000)
9,484,176
20X2
9,484,176
758,734
(600,000)
9,642,910
20X3
9,642,910
771,433
(600,000)
9,814,343
20X4
9,814,343
785,557
(600,000)
10,000,000
462
Amortised
cost at year
end
Note that the final interest expense of Rs. 785,557 includes a rounding
adjustment of Rs. 510).
There is no guidance on the subsequent accounting treatment of the equity
element. One approach would be to retain it as a separate component of equity
and then release it to retained earnings when the bond is paid or converted.
Example (continued): Double entry on repayment or conversion of the bond.
At 31 December 20X4 the bond will either be paid or converted. Possible double
entries in each case are as follows:
If the bond is repaid
Dr
Cr
Liability
10,000,000
Cash
10,000,000
and:
Equity component
662,800
Retained earnings
662,800
Cr
10,000,000
Share capital
2,000,000
Share premium
8,000,000
and:
Equity component
662,800
Retained earnings
662,800
Practice question
463
offset against share capital and disclosed in the notes to the accounts.
1.5 Offsetting
Offsetting an asset and a liability and presenting a net amount on the face of the
statement of financial position can result in a loss of information to the users. IAS
1 prohibits offset unless required or permitted by an IFRS.
The idea is that offset should only be allowed if it reflects the substance of the
transactions or balances.
IAS 32 adds more detail to this guidance in respect of offsetting financial assets
and liabilities.
IAS 32 requires the presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities in a
way that reflects the companys future cash flows from collecting the cash from
the asset and paying the cash on the liability. It limits a companys ability to offset
a financial asset and a financial liability to those instances when the cash flows
will occur at the same time.
The IAS 32 rule is that a financial asset and a financial liability must be offset and
shown net in the statement of financial position when and only when an entity:
Intends either to settle the amounts net, or to realise (sell) the asset and
settle the liability simultaneously.
In order for a legal right of set off to be current it must not be contingent on a
future event. Furthermore it must be legally enforceable in all of the following
circumstances:
464
Note: The existence of a legal right to set off a cash balance in one account with
an overdraft in another is insufficient for offsetting to be allowed. The company
must additionally show intent to settle the balances net, and this is likely to be
rare in practice. Consequently, cash balances in the bank and bank overdrafts
are usually reported separately in the statement of financial position, and not
netted off against each other.
Many companies adopting IFRS for the first time find that they have net amounts
in the statement of financial position under their old GAAP that have to be shown
as a separate financial asset and financial liability under IFRS. The net position is
described as being grossed up.
Rs.
400,000
160,000
560,000
The maximum distribution that can be made by the group (i.e. as a dividend paid
to Ps shareholders) is Rs. 400,000.
The share of post-acquisition retained profits of S are contained in a separate
legal entity and are not available for distribution by the parent.
If S were to pay a dividend, 80% would pass to P and hence become available for
P to pay out to its owners. (The remaining 20% would be owned by the NCI).
465
INTERPRETATIONS
Section overview
466
absolute
x
partial
x
The limit may change from time to time leading to a transfer between financial
liabilities and equity.
467
When an entity settles the dividend payable, how should it account for any
difference between the carrying amount of the assets distributed and the
carrying amount of the dividend payable?
The IFRIC applies only to distributions in which all owners of the same class of
equity instruments are treated equally.
Outside of the scope
IFRIC 17 does not address the accounting for the non-cash distribution by the
shareholders who receive the distribution
Recognition of dividend payable
Dividend payable should be recognised when it is appropriately authorised and is
no longer at the discretion of the entity
This is:
468
Subsequent measurement:
The carrying amount of the dividend payable must be reviewed at the end of
each reporting period and at settlement with any changes in the amount of the
dividend payable must be recognised in equity.
Accounting for any difference
Any difference between the carrying amount of the assets distributed and the
carrying amount of the dividend payable at settlement must be recognised in
profit and loss
Presentation and disclosure
Any difference between the carrying amounts of the dividend payable and the
assets distributed must be presented as a separate line item in the statement of
profit or loss.
An entity must disclose:
The brought forward and carried forward carrying amount of the dividend
payable.
When a dividend of non-cash assets is declared after the end of the period but
before the financial statements are authorised for issue the entity must disclose
the:
nature of asset;
469
IFRS 7: DISCLOSURE
Section overview
Objectives of IFRS 7
Risk disclosures
470
Held-to-maturity investments
The above categories are replaced by the following if IFRS 9 is being followed:
Other disclosures relating to the statement of financial position are also required.
These include the following:
Collateral. A note should disclose the amount of financial assets that the
entity has pledged as collateral for liabilities or contingent liabilities.
Defaults and breaches. For loans payable, the entity should disclose
details of any defaults during the period in the loan payments, or any other
breaches in the loan conditions.
With some exceptions, for each class of financial asset and financial liability, an
entity must disclose the fair value of the assets or liabilities in a way that permits
the fair value to be compared with the carrying amount for that class. An
important exception is where the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation
of fair value, which should normally be the case for short-term receivables and
payables.
471
the amount removed from equity and reclassified from equity to profit
and loss through other comprehensive income in the period.
Total interest income and total interest expense, calculated using the
effective interest method, for financial assets or liabilities that are not at fair
value through profit or loss.
Fee income and expenses arising from financial assets or liabilities that are
not at fair value through profit or loss.
The amount of any impairment loss for each class of financial asset.
Other disclosures
IFRS 7 also requires other disclosures. These include the following:
Information relating to hedge accounting, for cash flow hedges, fair value
hedges and hedges of net investments in foreign operations. The
disclosures should include a description of each type of hedge, a
description of the financial instruments designated as hedging instruments
and their fair values at the reporting date, and the nature of the risks being
hedged.
With some exceptions, for each class of financial asset and financial
liability, an entity must disclose the fair value of the assets or liabilities in a
way that permits the fair value to be compared with the carrying amount for
that class. An important exception is where the carrying amount is a
reasonable approximation of fair value, which should normally be the case
for short-term receivables and payables.
Credit risk
Market risk.
For each category of risk, the entity should provide both quantitative and
qualitative information about the risks.
472
Quantitative disclosures. For each type of risk, the entity should also
disclose summary quantitative data about its exposures at the end of the
reporting period. This disclosure should be based on information presented
to the entitys senior management, such as the board of directors or chief
executive officer.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that someone who owes money (a trade receivable, a
borrower, a bond issuer, and so on) will not pay. An entity is required to disclose
the following information about credit risk exposures:
A best estimate of the entitys maximum exposure to credit risk at the end
of the reporting period and a description of any collateral held.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the entity will not have access to sufficient cash to
meet its payment obligations when these are due. IFRS 7 requires disclosure of:
A description of how the entity manages the liquidity risk that arises from
this maturity profile of payments.
Market risk
Market risk is the risk of losses that might occur from changes in the value of
financial instruments due to changes in:
Exchange rates,
Interest rates, or
Market prices.
An entity should provide a sensitivity analysis for each type of market risk to
which it is exposed at the end of the reporting period. The sensitivity analysis
should show how profit or loss would have been affected by a change in the
market risk variable (interest rate, exchange rate, market price of an item) that
might have been reasonably possible at that date.
Alternatively, an entity can provide sensitivity analysis in a different form, where it
uses a different model for analysis of sensitivity, such as a value at risk (VaR)
model. These models are commonly used by banks.
473
Cash (R
Rs.)
Discount
factor 9%
Present
value (Rs.))
20X5 - interest
20X6 - interest
20X7 - interest
20X7 - principal
100,000
100,000
100,000
2,000,000
0.9174
0.8417
0.7722
0.7722
91,743
84,168
77,218
1,544,367
1,797,496
202,504
2,000,000
Dr (Rs.)
2,000,000
1,797,496
Equity
c)
d)
202,504
Amortisation table
Liability at
start of year
Rs.
20X5
1,797,496
20X6
20X7
Finance charge
at 9%
Rs.
161,775
Interest
paid
Rs.
(100,000)
Liability at
end of year
Rs.
1,859,271
167,334
173,395
(100,000)
(100,000)
1,926,605
2,000,000
Rs.
2,000,000
202,504
Rs.
1,859,271
1,926,605
Cr (Rs.)
1,200,000
1,002,504
474
CHAPTER
17
Contents
1 Introduction to IFRS 13
2 Measurement
3 Valuation techniques
4 Liabilities and an entitys own equity instruments
5 Disclosure
475
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
476
INTRODUCTION TO IFRS 13
Section overview
Background
Market participants
1.1 Background
There are many instances where IFRS requires or allows entities to measure or
disclose the fair value of assets, liabilities or their own equity instruments.
Examples include (but are not limited to):
Standard
IASs 16/38
IAS 40
IAS 19
Defined benefit plans are measured as the fair value of the plan
assets net of the present value of the plan obligations.
IAS 39
IFRS 9
IFRS 7
IFRS 3
IFRS 2
477
Other standards required the use of measures which incorporate fair value.
Standard
IASs 36
IFRS 5
Some of these standards contained little guidance on the meaning of fair value.
Others did contain guidance but this was developed over many years and in a
piecemeal manner.
Purpose of IFRS 13
The purpose of IFRS 13 is to:
IFRS 13 does not change what should be fair valued nor when this should occur.
The fair value measurement framework described in this IFRS applies to both
initial and subsequent measurement if fair value is required or permitted by other
IFRSs.
Scope of IFRS 13
IFRS 13 applies to any situation where IFRS requires or permits fair value
measurements or disclosures about fair value measurements (and other
measurements based on fair value such as fair value less costs to sell) with the
following exceptions.
IFRS 13 does not apply to:
assets for which recoverable amount is fair value less costs of disposal in
accordance with IAS 36.
478
479
They are able to enter into a transaction for the asset or liability.
They are willing to enter into a transaction for the asset or liability, i.e. they
are motivated but not forced or otherwise compelled to do so.
480
MEASUREMENT
Section overview
It would be unusual to find an active market for the sale of non- financial
assets so some other sort of valuation technique would usually be used to
determine their fair value.
481
fair value is not net realisable value or fair value less costs of disposal;
and
using the price at which an asset can be sold for as the basis for fair
valuation does not mean that the entity intends to sell it
Transport costs
If location is a characteristic of the asset the price in the principal (or most
advantageous) market is adjusted for the costs that would be incurred to
transport the asset from its current location to that market.
482
Rs.
Sale price
260
250
Transport cost
(20)
(20)
240
230
Transaction cost
(30)
(10)
210
220
(a)
What fair value would be used to measure the asset if Market A were the
principal market?
(b)
What fair value would be used to measure the asset if no principal market
could be identified?
Answer
(a)
If Market A is the principal market for the asset the fair value of the asset
would be measured using the price that would be received in that market,
after taking into account transport costs (Rs. 240).
(b)
If neither market is the principal market for the asset, the fair value of the
asset would be measured using the price in the most advantageous
market.
The most advantageous market is the market that maximises the amount
that would be received to sell the asset, after taking into account
transaction costs and transport costs (i.e. the net amount that would be
received in the respective markets). This is Market B where the net amount
that would be received for the asset would be Rs. 220.
The fair value of the asset is measured using the price in that market (Rs.
250), less transport costs (Rs. 20), resulting in a fair value measurement of
Rs. 230.
Transaction costs are taken into account when determining which market
is the most advantageous market but the price used to measure the fair
value of the asset is not adjusted for those costs (although it is adjusted for
transport costs).
483
Market B
Rs.
Rs.
Sale price
500
505
Transport cost
(20)
(30)
480
475
1,000
29,000
(a)
(b)
What is the fair value of the asset in accordance with IFRS 13?
Answer
a)
b)
The fair value of the asset in accordance with IFRS 13 is $505. This is the
price available in the principal market before transaction costs. (The
principal market is the one with the highest level of activity).
Different entities might have access to different markets. This might result in
different entities reporting similar assets at different fair values.
physically possible;
financially feasible.
484
The current use of land is presumed to be its highest and best use unless market
or other factors suggest a different use.
Example: Highest and best use
X Limited acquired a plot of land developed for industrial use as a factory. A
factory with similar facilities in Karachi and access has recently been sold for Rs.
50 million.
The plot is located on the outskirts of Clifton in Karachi.
Similar sites nearby have recently been developed for residential use as sites for
high-rise apartment buildings.
X Limited determines that the land could be developed as a site for residential
use at a cost of Rs. 10 million (to cover demolition of the factory and legal costs
associated with the change of use). The plot of land would then be worth Rs. 62
million.
The highest and best use of the land would be determined by comparing the
following:
Rs. million
Value of the land as currently developed
50
52
Conclusion:
The fair value of the land is Rs. 52 million.
485
VALUATION TECHNIQUES
Section overview
Valuation techniques
Bid/offer prices
market approach uses prices and other relevant information from market
transactions involving identical or similar assets and liabilities;
(b)
Quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value
and must be used to measure fair value whenever available.
486
Examples
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
The price at which an asset can be sold to the market is called the bid price
(it is the amount the market bids for the asset).
The price at which an asset can be bought from the market is called the ask
or offer price (it is the amount the market asks for the asset or offers to sell
it for).
The price within the bid-ask spread that is most representative of fair value in the
circumstances must be used to measure fair value.
Previously, bid price had to be used for financial assets and ask price for financial
liabilities but this is no longer the case.
487
General principles
In the absence of an active market there might be an observable market for items
held by other parties as assets.
using the quoted price in an active market (if available) for the identical item
held by another party as an asset; or failing that
using other observable inputs (e.g. quoted price in a market that is not
active for the identical item held by another party as an asset); or failing
that
another valuation technique (e.g. using quoted prices for similar liabilities or
equity instruments held by other parties as assets (market approach).
488
4.3 Liabilities and equity instruments not held by other parties as assets
In this case fair value is measured from the perspective of a market participant
that owes the liability or has issued the claim on equity.
For example, when applying a present value technique an entity might take into
account the future cash outflows that a market participant would expect to incur
in fulfilling the obligation (including the compensation that a market participant
would require for taking on the obligation).
It manages the group of financial assets and financial liabilities on the basis
of the entitys net exposure to a particular risk (market risk or credit risk of a
particular counterparty) in accordance with its documented risk
management or investment strategy;
It provides information on that basis about the group of financial assets and
financial liabilities to the entitys key management personnel; and
It measures those financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value in the
statement of financial position at the end of each reporting period.
489
DISCLOSURE
Section overview
Disclosures
Recurring fair value measurements are those that are required or permitted
in the statement of financial position at the end of each reporting period
(e.g. the fair value of investment property when the IAS 40 fair value model
is used);
the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure the fair value assets
and liabilities on a recurring or non-recurring basis;
the effect on profit or loss or other comprehensive income for the period of
recurring fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs
(Level 3).
the level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement
is categorised.
490
5.3 Disclosures
The following information must be disclosed as a minimum for each class of
assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the statement of financial position
after initial recognition.
For recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements
The fair value measurement at the end of the reporting period and the reasons
for the measurement for non-recurring fair value measurements
The level of the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurements are
categorised in their entirety (Level 1, 2 or 3).
For fair value measurements categorised within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy:
a description of the valuation technique(s) and the inputs used in the fair
value measurement for;
Quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair
value measurement for fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the
fair value hierarchy.
A description of the valuation processes used for fair value measurements
categorised within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The reason why a non-financial asset is being used in a manner that differs from
its highest and best use when this is the case.
For recurring fair value measurements
The amounts of any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy, the reasons for those transfers and the entitys policy for determining
when transfers between levels are deemed to have occurred.
For fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the fair value
hierarchy:
total gains or losses recognised in profit or loss (and the line items in
which they are recognised);
for recurring fair value measurements categorised within Level 3 of the fair
value hierarchy:
491
Other
If financial assets and financial liabilities are managed on a net basis and the fair
value of the net position is measured that fact must be disclosed.
492
CHAPTER
18
493
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 53
SIC 25: Income taxes changes in the tax status of an enterprise or its
shareholders
494
Taxation of profits
The tax rate is applied to the taxable profit to calculate how much a company
owes in tax for the period. IFRS describes this as current tax.
An exam question might require you to perform a basic taxation computation
from information given in the question.
Illustration: Tax computation format
Rs.
X
X
(X)
Taxable profit
Tax rate
x%
495
789,000
70,000
Fine paid
125,000
15,000
210,000
80,000
Capital gain
97,000
10,000
(187,000)
Assessable profit
812,000
(78,000)
Taxable profit
734,000
220,200
496
Tax base
The above example referred to the tax written down value of the machinery and
buildings. This is the tax authoritys view of the carrying amount of the asset
measured at cost less capital allowances calculated according to the tax
legislation.
IFRS uses the term tax base to refer to an asset or liability measured according
to the tax rules.
Definition
The tax base of an asset or liability is the amount attributed to that asset or liability
for tax purposes.
The tax base of an asset is the amount that the tax authorities will allow as a
deduction in the future.
Measurement
Current tax liabilities (assets) for the current and prior periods must be measured
at the amount expected to be paid to (recovered from) the taxation authorities,
using the tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively
enacted by the end of the reporting period.
Example: Over-e
estimate or under-e
estimate of tax
Rs.
Profit from operations
Rs.
460,000
Interest
(60,000)
400,000
Tax:
Adjustment for under-estimate of tax in the
previous year
Tax on current year profits
100,000
(103,000)
3,000
297,000
497
Rs.
X
X
X
(X)
(6,000)
108,000
Rs.
114,000
Rs.
77,000
108,000
185,000
498
(123,000)
62,000
This results in a breakdown in the tax rate percentage relationship between the
profit before tax figure and the taxation figure. In other words the tax charge is
not the tax rate applied to the profit before tax.
Example: Deferred taxation - Underlying problem
X Limited made accounting profit before tax of Rs. 50,000 in each of the years,
20X1, 20X2 and 20X3 and pays tax at 30%.
X Limited bought an item of plant on 1 January 20X1 for Rs. 9,000. This asset is to
be depreciated on a straight line basis over 3 years.
Accounting depreciation is not allowed as a taxable deduction in the jurisdiction in
which the company operates. Instead tax allowable depreciation is available as
shown in the following tax computations.
20X1
20X2
20X3
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
50,000
50,000
50,000
3,000
3,000
3,000
(4,500)
(2,500)
(2,000)
(1,500)
500
1,000
Taxable profit
48,500
50,500
51,000
Tax @ 30%
14,550
15,150
15,300
499
20X2
2
Rs.
20X3
3
Rs.
Total
Rs.
50,000
50,000
50,000
150,000
(14,550)
35,450
(15,150) (15,300)
34,850
34,700
(45,000)
105,000
Looking at the total column, the profit before tax is linked to the taxation
figure through the tax rate (150,000 u 30% = 45,000).
This is not the case in each separate year.
This is because the current tax charge is not found by multiplying the
accounting profit before tax by the tax rate. Rather, it is found by
multiplying an adjusted version of this figure by the tax rate
The item of plant is written off in the calculation of both accounting profit
and taxable profit but by different amounts in different periods. The
differences are temporary in nature as over the three year period, the
same expense is recognised for the item of plant under both the
accounting rules and the tax rules.
Transactions recognised in the financial statements in one period may have their
tax effect deferred to (or more rarely, accelerated from) another. Thus the tax is
not matched with the underlying transaction that has given rise to it.
In the above example the tax consequences of an expense (depreciation in this
case) are recognised in different periods to when the expense is recognised.
Accounting for deferred tax is based on the principle that the tax consequence of
an item should be recognised in the same period as the item is recognised. It
tries to match tax expenses and credits to the period in which the underlying
transactions to which they relate are recognised.
In order to do this, the taxation effect that arises due to the differences between
the figures recognised under IFRS and the tax rules is recognised in the financial
statements.
The double entry to achieve this is between a deferred tax balance in the
statement of financial position (which might be an asset or a liability) and the tax
charge in the statement of comprehensive income.
The result of this is that the overall tax expense recognised in the statement of
comprehensive income is made up of the current tax and deferred tax numbers.
Definition: Tax expense
Tax expense (tax income) is the aggregate amount included in the determination of
profit or loss for the period in respect of current tax and deferred tax.
500
the approach identifies the deferred tax liability (or asset) that should
be recognised (with the movement on this amount recognised as a
credit or expense in the statement of comprehensive income).
IAS 12 uses the statement of financial position perspective but both will be
explained here for greater understanding.
9,000
9,000
(3,000)
(4,500)
Cost at 31/12/X1
6,000
4,500
(3,000)
(2,500)
Cost at 31/12/X2
3,000
2,000
(3,000)
(2,000)
Cost at 31/12/X3
501
(1,500)
1,500
500
1,000
1,000
20X2
20X3
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
50,000
14,550
15,150
15,300
450
(150)
(300)
(15,000)
(15,000)
(15,000)
35,000
35,000
35,000
20X1
20X2
20X3
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Balance b/f
nil
450
300
450
(150)
(300)
Balance b/f
450
300
nil
Deferred tax
Profit after tax
Statement of financial position
502
50,000
50,000
6,000
4,500
1,500
450
At 31/12/X2
3,000
2,000
1,000
300
At 31/12/X3
nil
nil
nil
nil
Tax expense
Deferred tax liability
Credit
450
Credit
150
Credit
300
These amounts are the same as on the previous page and would have the
same impact on the financial statements.
503
The recognition of deferred taxation has restored the relationship between profit
before tax and the tax charge through the tax rate in each year (30% of Rs.
50,000 = Rs. 15,000).
Terminology
When a difference comes into existence or grows it is said to originate. When the
difference reduces in size it is said to reverse.
Thus, in the above example a difference of Rs. 1,500 originated in 20X1. This
difference then reversed in 20X2 and 20X3.
504
Deferred tax relating to revaluations and other items recognised outside profit or
loss
505
1,000
Tax base
800
Temporary
difference
Deferred
tax liability
(30%)
200
60
Inventory
650
600
50
15
Receivable
800
500
300
90
Receivable (note 1)
500
nil
500
150
(1,000)
(1,200)
200
60
Payable (note 2)
Note 1::
This implies that an item accounted for using the accruals basis in the
financial statements is being taxed on a cash bases.
If an item is taxed on cash basis the tax base would be zero as no
receivable would be recognised under the tax rules.
Note 2:
The credit balance in the financial statements is Rs. 1,000 and the tax base
is a credit of Rs. 1,200. Therefore, the financial statements show a debit
balance of 200 compared to the tax base. This leads to a deferred tax
liability.
IAS 12 rationalises the approach as follows (using the non-current assets
figures to illustrate)
Inherent in the recognition of an asset is that the carrying amount (Rs.
1,000) will be recovered in the form of economic benefits that will flow to
the entity in future periods.
When the carrying amount exceeds the tax base (as it does in this case at
Rs. 800) the amount of taxable economic benefit will exceed the amount
that will be allowed as a deduction for tax purposes.
This difference is a taxable temporary difference and the obligation to pay
the resulting income tax in the future periods is a liability that exists at the
reporting date.
The company will only be able to deduct Rs. 800 in the tax computations
against the recovery of Rs. 1,000.
The Rs. 200 that is not covered will be taxed and that tax should be
recognised for now.
506
800
900
(100)
30
(1,200)
(1,000)
(200)
60
Note 1:
There is a debit balance for the non-current asset of Rs. 1,000 and its tax
base is a debit of Rs. 1,200. Therefore, the financial statements show a
credit balance of 200 compared to the tax base. This leads to a deferred tax
asset.
(b)
(c)
items which are taxed on a cash basis but which will be accounted for
on an accruals basis.
Revaluation of assets where the tax authorities do not amend the tax base
when the asset is revalued.
507
600,000
600,000
180,000
Development costs may be capitalised and amortised (in accordance with IAS
38) but tax relief may be given for the development costs as they are paid.
Example: Recognition of deferred tax liabilities
In the year ended 30 June 2016, B Limited incurred development costs of Rs.
320,000.
These were capitalised in accordance with IAS 38, with an amortisation charge of
Rs. 15,000 in 2016.
Development costs are an allowable expense for tax purposes in the period in
which they are paid. The relevant tax rate is 30%.
Carrying
Temporary
amount
difference
Tax base
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Development costs
305,000
305,000
Deferred tax liability @ 30%
91,500
Accounting depreciation is not deductible for tax purposes in most tax regimes.
Instead the governments allow a deduction on statutory grounds.
Example: Recognition of deferred tax liabilities
C Limited has non-current assets at 31 December 2016 with a cost of Rs.
5,000,000.
Accumulated depreciation for accounting purposes is Rs. 2,250,000 to give a
carrying amount of Rs. 2,750,000
Tax deductible depreciation of Rs. 3,000,000 has been deducted to date.
The fixed assets have a tax base of Rs. 2,000,000.
Carrying
Temporary
amount
Tax base
difference
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Non-current asset
2,750,000
2,000,000
750,000
Deferred tax liability @ 30%
225,000
508
Warranty provision
Carrying
amount
Tax base
Temporary
difference
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
100,000
100,000
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
nil
500,000
500,000
150,000
Income approach
x
In case of liabilities: Carrying amount > Tax base = Deferred tax asset
(and vice versa)
509
Step 3: Compare this figure to the opening figure and complete the double
entry.
12,000
510
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Non-current assets
200,000
140,000
60,000
Accrued income
10,000
10,000
18,000
(liability)
3,000
(liability)
Accrued expense
(20,000)
(20,000)
(6,000)
asset
50,000
15,000
The answer can then be completed by filling in the missing figures and
constructing the journal as follows:
Rs.
Deferred taxation balance at the start of the year
12,000
3,000
15,000
Journal:
Debit
Credit
3,000
3,000
511
3.5 Deferred tax relating to revaluations and other items recognised outside
profit or loss
A change in the carrying amount of an asset or liability might be due to a
transaction recognised outside the statement of profit or loss.
For example, IAS 16: Property, plant and equipment, allows for the revaluation of
assets. The revaluation of an asset without a corresponding change to its tax
base (which is usually the case) will change the temporary difference in respect
of that asset. An increase in the carrying amount of an asset due to an upward
revaluation is recognised outside profit or loss. In Pakistan it is credited directly to
an account outside equity called revalution surplus in accordance with the
Companies Ordinance 1984. (Elsewhere is credited to other comprehensive
income in accordance with IAS 16).
In these cases, the other side of the entry that changes the balance on the
deferred taxation liability (asset) is also recognised outside the statement of profit
or loss and in the same location as the transaction that gave rise to the change in
the temporary difference.
Example continued: Accounting for deferred tax
The following information relates to the movement on the carrying amount of an
item of plant together with temporary differences in a reporting period.
Carrying
amount
Tax base
Temporary
differences
DT balance at
30%
At 1 January
Rs.
100,000
Rs.
80,000
Rs.
20,000
Rs.
6,000
Depreciation
(10,000)
(15,000)
5,000
1,500
90,000
65,000
35,000
35,000
10,500
125,000
65,000
60,000
18,000
Revaluation
6,000
1,500
Revaluation surplus
10,500
18,000
Journal:
Credit
Debit
1,500
10,500
12,000
512
513
Cash
Cr
Liability
9,337,200
Equity
662,800
End of:
Amortised
cost at start
of the year
Interest at
effective rate
(8%)
Cash flow
(interest
actually paid
at 6%)
Amortised
cost at year
end
20X1
9,337,200
746,976
(600,000)
9,484,176
20X2
9,484,176
758,734
(600,000)
9,642,910
20X3
9,642,910
771,433
(600,000)
9,814,343
20X4
9,814,343
785,557
(600,000)
10,000,000
The deferred tax liability at initial recognition and at each subsequent year end is
as calculated as follows:
Deferred
tax liability
Carrying
Temporary
difference
amount
Tax base
(30%)
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
9,337,200
10,000,000
(662,800)
(198,840)
20X1
9,484,176
10,000,000
(515,824)
(154,747)
20X2
9,642,910
10,000,000
(357,090)
(107,127)
20X3
9,814,343
10,000,000
(185,657)
(55,697)
20X4
10,000,000
10,000,000
Initial
recognition
End of:
514
Cr
198,840
198,840
Note: The complete double entry to record the convertible bond and
deferred tax on initial recognition is as follows
Dr
Cash
Cr
10,000,000
Liability
9,337,200
198,840
463,960
Year 1
Dr
Deferred tax liability (198,840 154,747)
Statement of profit and loss
Cr
44,093
44,093
Year 2
Dr
Deferred tax liability (154,747 107,127)
Statement of profit and loss
Cr
47,620
47,620
Year 3
Dr
Deferred tax liability (107,127 55,697)
Statement of profit and loss
Cr
51,429
51,429
Year 4
Dr
Deferred tax liability (55,697 0)
Statement of profit and loss
515
Cr
55,697
55,697
516
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
100,000
nil
100,000
nil
517
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
100,000
100,000
nil
nil
In the future, both the carrying amount and the tax base of the goodwill
might change leading to deferred tax consequences.
Comment on the exceptions: Initial recognition of other items
A temporary difference may arise on initial recognition of an asset or liability, for
example if part or all of the cost of an asset will not be deductible for tax
purposes. This exception relates to the initial recognition of an asset or liability in
a transaction that is not a business combination. In other words, the exception
does not apply if the initial recognition is due to a business combination. There is
guidance on deferred tax arising in business combinations
If the transaction is not a business combination and affects either accounting
profit or taxable profit the exception does not apply and deferred tax is
recognised on initial recognition.
Example: Loan
In the year ended 31 December 2016, C Limited lent Rs. 100,000 to another
company and incurred costs of Rs. 5,000 in arranging the loan. The loan is
recognised at Rs. 105,000 in the accounts.
Under the tax rules in C Limiteds jurisdiction the cost of arranging the loan is
deductible in the period in which the loan is made.
The relevant tax rate is 30%.
Carrying
amount
Loan
Deferred tax on initial recognition
Rs.
Tax base
Rs.
105,000
100,000
Temporary
difference
Rs.
5,000
1,500
The exception does not apply as the transaction affects the taxable
profits on initial recognition. Hence a deferred taxation liability is
booked.
518
Non-current asset
Carrying
amount
Tax base
Temporary
difference
Rs.
100,000
Rs.
Nil
Rs.
100,000
Non-current asset
nil
Tax base
Temporary
difference
Rs.
Nil
Rs.
80,000
nil
IAS 12 rule
A deferred tax asset must be recognised for all deductible temporary differences
to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which
the deductible temporary difference can be utilised, unless the deferred tax asset
arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that:
at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable
profit (tax loss).
519
A deferred tax asset must only be recognised to the extent that it is probable that
taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary difference
can be used.
Implication
In order to meet this requirement an entity must make an assessment of the
probability that profits will be available in the future against which the deferred tax
asset might be utilised.
IAS 12 says that this will be the case when there are sufficient taxable temporary
differences relating to the same taxation authority and the same taxable entity
which are expected to reverse:
in periods into which a tax loss arising from the deferred tax asset can be
carried back or forward.
If this is not the case (i.e. there are insufficient taxable temporary differences
relating to the same taxation authority and the same taxable entity) a deferred tax
asset is recognised only to the extent that such profits exist or tax planning
opportunities are available that will create taxable profit in appropriate periods.
Tax planning opportunities are actions that could be taken in order to create or
increase taxable income in a particular period.
Deferred tax assets for unused tax losses
The availability of unused tax losses and unused tax credits that can be carried
forward to reduce future taxable profits will result in the recognition of a deferred
tax asset according to the same criteria as above. In other words, a deferred tax
asset will be recognised to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit
will be available against which the unused tax losses and unused tax credits can
be utilised.
Example: Unused tax losses
X Limited pays tax at 30%
In the year ended 31 December 2016, X Limited had incurred a taxable loss of Rs
200,000.
This was the first such loss suffered by the company. It fully expects to return to
profit next year. In fact its forecasts show an expected profit of Rs. 300,000 next
year.
The company had a single taxable temporary difference as follows:.
Analysis
The loss is fully recoverable against future taxable profits.
Conclusion
X Limited should recognise a deferred tax asset of Rs. 60,000 (30%u Rs.
200,000).
However, the existence of unused tax losses is strong evidence that future
taxable profit may not be available. An entity with a history of recent losses may
only recognise a deferred tax asset in respect of unused tax losses or tax credits
to the extent that:
520
Non-current asset
Carrying
amount
Tax base
Temporary
difference
Rs.
1,500,000
Rs.
1,380,000
Rs.
120,000
Analysis
The loss is not fully recoverable against future taxable profits.
Conclusion
X Limited should recognise a deferred tax asset to the extent of the
taxable temporary differences. This is an amount of Rs. 36,000 (30%u
Rs. 120,000).
Review at the end of each period
IAS 12 requires that the carrying amount of a deferred tax asset must be
reviewed at the end of each reporting period to check if it is still probable that
sufficient taxable profit is expected to be available to allow the benefit of its use.
If this is not the case the carrying amount of the deferred tax asset must be
reduced to the amount that it is expected will be used in the future. Any such
reduction might be reversed in the future if circumstances change again.
IAS 12 also requires that unrecognised deferred tax assets should be reassessed
at the end of each reporting period. A previously unrecognised deferred tax asset
will be recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable
profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.
521
Rs.
Tax base
Rs.
100,000
nil
Temporary
difference
Rs.
100,000
the tax base of an asset is the amount that will be deductible for tax
purposes against any taxable economic benefits that will flow to an entity
when it recovers the carrying amount of the asset. If those economic
benefits will not be taxable, the tax base of the asset is equal to its carrying
amount.
the tax base of a liability is its carrying amount, less any amount that will be
deductible for tax purposes in respect of that liability in future periods. In the
case of revenue which is received in advance, the tax base of the resulting
liability is its carrying amount, less any amount of the revenue that will not
be taxable in future periods.
Tax base
Rs.
Temporary
difference
Rs.
Receivable
100,000
100,000
nil
The item is not taxable so its tax base is set to be the same as its
carrying amount.
This results in a nil temporary difference and prevents the recognition of
deferred tax on this asset.
This sounds rather complicated but just remember that it is a mechanism to
exclude non-taxable items from the consideration of deferred tax (even though
the definition might have included them).
Remember this: there is no deferred tax to recognise on items that are not
taxed or for which no tax relief is given.
522
Closing comment
Accounting for deferred taxation restores the relationship that should exist
between the profit before tax in the financial statements, the tax rate and the tax
charge. In earlier examples we saw that after accounting for deferred tax the tax
expense (current and deferred tax) was equal to the tax rate u the accounting
profit before tax.
This will not be the case if there are permanent differences.
523
Introduction
Revaluation of assets/liabilities in the fair value exercise
5.1 Introduction
Additional deferred tax items need to be considered in preparing group accounts,
because new sources of temporary differences arise:
Tax base
Temporary
differences
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
180
150
30
Accounts receivable
210
210
Inventory
124
124
(120)
(120)
Pension liability
Accounts payable
Temporary differences
30
524
Fair value
Tax base
Temporary
differences
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
270
150
120
Accounts receivable
210
210
Inventory
174
124
50
Pension liability
(30)
(30)
(120)
(120)
Accounts payable
Fair value of net assets
504
Temporary differences
140
42
The deferred tax balance of Rs. 9,000 must be increased to Rs. 42,000
in the consolidation workings.
Goodwill is calculated as follows:
Rs. 000
Cost of investment
600
504
(42)
(462)
Goodwill on acquisition
138
the parent is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary
difference (i.e. the timing of when the dividend is paid); and
it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the future (i.e.
there is no intention to instigate the payment of a dividend).
525
526
Presentation
Disclosure
6.1 Presentation
IAS 12: Income taxes contains rules on when current tax liabilities may be offset
against current tax assets
Offset of current tax liabilities and assets
A company must offset current tax assets and current tax liabilities if, and only if,
it:
has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts; and
intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the
liability simultaneously.
These are the same rules as apply to assets and liabilities in general as
described in IAS 1.
In the context of taxation balances whether a current tax liability and asset may
be offset is usually specified in tax law, thus satisfying the first criterion.
In most cases, where offset is legally available the asset would then be settled on
a net basis (i.e. the company would pay the net amount).
Offset of deferred tax liabilities and assets
A company must offset deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities if, and only
if:
the entity has a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against
current tax liabilities; and
the deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities relate to income
taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either:
x
The existence of deferred tax liability is strong evidence that a deferred tax asset
from the same tax authority will be recoverable.
Example: Offset of deferred tax liabilities and assets
The following deferred tax positions relate to the same entity:
Deferred tax liability
Deferred tax asset
Situation 1
12,000
(8,000)
Situation 2
5,000
(8,000)
4,000
(3,000)
527
In situation 1, the financial statements will report the net position as a liability of
4,000. The existence of the liability indicates that the company will be able to
recover the asset, so the asset can be set off against the liability.
In situation 2, setting off the asset against the liability leaves a deferred tax asset
of 3,000. This asset may only be recognised if the entity believes it is probable that
it will be recovered in the foreseeable future.
6.2 Disclosure
Components of tax expense (income)
The major components of tax expense (income) must be disclosed separately.
Components of tax expense (income) may include:
any adjustments recognised in the period for current tax of prior periods;
the amount of deferred tax expense (income) relating to the origination and
reversal of temporary differences;
the amount of the benefit arising from a previously unrecognised tax loss,
tax credit or temporary difference of a prior period that is used to reduce
current tax expense;
Rs.
129,000
(5,000)
Deferred taxation
Arising during the period
20,000
(5,000)
15,000
139,000
528
1,000,000
Rs..
Rs.
820,000
180,000
45,000
30,000
(5,000)
25,000
20,000
45,000
Journal:
Income statement (tax expense)
Debit
20,000
Credit
5,000
15,000
Tax reconciliation
The following must also be disclosed:
A major theme in this chapter is that the different rules followed to calculate
accounting profit and taxable profit lead to distortion of the relationship that exists
529
between profit before tax in the financial statements, the tax rate and the current
tax expense for the period. Accounting for deferred tax corrects this distortion so
that after accounting for deferred tax the tax expense (current and deferred tax)
was equal to the tax rate u the accounting profit before tax.
This is not the case if there are permanent differences. The above reconciliations
show the effect of permanent differences.
Instances of when permanent differences may arise:
129,000
Tax expense
Current tax
129,000
15,000
144,000
500,000
30%
150,000
(6,000)
144,000
30.0%
(1.2%)
28.8%
Note: this difference arises only when there are permanent differences
530
Other disclosures
The following must also be disclosed separately:
the aggregate current and deferred tax relating to items recognised directly
in equity;
the amount of the deferred tax assets and liabilities recognised in the
statement of financial position for each period presented;
the amount of a deferred tax asset and the nature of the evidence
supporting its recognition, when:
x
the entity has suffered a loss in either the current or preceding period
in the tax jurisdiction to which the deferred tax asset relates.
531
Practice questions
XYZ Limited had an accounting profit before tax of Rs. 90,000 for the year
ended 31st December 2016. The tax rate is 30%.
The following balances and information are relevant as at 31st December
2016.
Non--current assets
Property
Plant and machinery
Assets held under finance lease
Rs.
63,000
Rs.
100,000
90,000
1
2
80,000
Trade receivables
73,000
Interest receivable
Payables
1,000
Receivables:
Fine
10,000
85,867
3,300
Interest payable
Note 1:: The property cost the company Rs. 70,000 at the start of the year. It
is being depreciated on a 10% straight line basis for accounting purposes.
The companys tax advisers have said that the company can claim Rs.
42,000 accelerated depreciation as a taxable expense in this years tax
computation.
Note 2: The balances in respect of plant and machinery are after providing
for accounting depreciation of Rs. 12,000 and tax allowable depreciation of
Rs. 10,000 respectively.
Note 3:: The asset held under the finance lease was acquired during the
period.
The tax code does not distinguish between finance leases and operating
leases. Rental expense for leases is tax deductible. The annual rental for
the asset is Rs. 28,800 and was paid on 31st December 2017.
Note 4: The receivables figure is shown net of an allowance for doubtful
balances of Rs. 7,000. This is the first year that such an allowance has been
recognised. A deduction for debts is only allowed for tax purposes when the
debtor enters liquidation.
Note 5: Interest income is taxed and interest expense is allowable on a cash
basis. There were no opening balances on interest receivable and interest
payable.
a.
b.
c.
Show the movement on the deferred tax account for the year ended 31
December 2016 given that the opening balance was Rs. 3,600 Cr.
Prepare a note showing the components of the tax expense for the period.
d.
e.
Prepare a reconciliation between the tax expense and the product of the
accounting profit multiplied by the applicable rate.
532
7,000
12,000
20,000
14,667
7,000
3,300
10,000
1a
a
Rs.
90,000
73,967
1,000
42,000
10,000
28,800
Tax 30%
(81,800)
82,167
24,650
Property
Plant and machinery
Assets held under finance lease
Finance lease obligation
Trade receivables
Interest receivable
Fine
Interest payable
Carrying
value
Rs.
63,000
100,000
80,000
(85,867)
(5,867)
73,000
1,000
(10,000)
(3,300)
1b
Tax base
Rs.
28,000
90,000
nil
nil
nil
80,000
nil
(10,000)
nil
533
Temporary
difference
Rs.
35,000
10,000
80,000
(85,867)
(5,867)
(7,000)
1,000
(3,300)
29,833
8,950
Deferred
tax @ 30%
13,800
(4,850)
8,950
Solution: Movement on the deferred tax account for the year ended 31 December
2016..
Rs.
Deferred tax as at 1st January 2016
3,600
Statement of comprehensive income (balancing figure)
5,350
Deferred tax as at 31st December 2016
8,950
Solution: Components of tax expense for the year ended 31 December 2016.
Rs.
24,650
5,350
Tax expense
30,000
Accounting profit
Tax at the applicable rate (30%)
27,000
1d
1e
Rs.
90,000
1c
3,000
30,000
534
CHAPTER
19
Business combinations
and consolidation
Contents
1 The nature of a group and consolidated accounts
2 IFRS 10: Consolidated financial statements
3 Proposed amendments
4 IFRS 3: Business combinations
5 Consolidation technique
6 Accounting for goodwill
535
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
A3
536
other comprehensive income, which consists of gains or losses that are not
reported in profit or loss such as gains on asset revaluations;
transactions between the entity and its owners in their capacity as owners,
which are called equity transactions and reported in the statement of
changes in equity.
537
the consolidated assets, liabilities, income and expenses are those of the
parent and its subsidiaries added on a line by line basis;
Changes of ownership
IFRS 3 explains how to account for further investments in a subsidiary after
control has been achieved. These are called step acquisitions.
IFRS 10 explains how to account for disposals.
538
Introduction to IFRS 10
ability to use its power over the investee to affect the amount of its returns
539
A company does not have to own all of the shares in another company in order to
control it.
Illustration: Partly owned subsidiary
A owns 80% of Bs voting share capital.
A
80%
B
Control is assumed to exist when the parent owns directly, or indirectly through
other subsidiaries, more than half of the voting power of the entity, unless in
exceptional circumstances it can be clearly demonstrated that such control does
not exist.
540
Illustration:
A
60%
B
70%
A company might control another company even if it owns shares which give it
less than half of the voting rights because it has an agreement with other
shareholders which allow it to exercise control.
Illustration: Wholly owned subsidiary
A owns 45% of Bs voting share capital.
A further 10% is held by As bank who have agreed to use their vote as directed by
A.
A
45%
It was stated above but is worth emphasising that in the vast majority of cases
control is achieved through the purchase of shares that give the holder more than
50% of the voting rights in a company.
541
Two or more investors collectively control an investee when they must act
together to direct the relevant activities. If this is the case, no investor can direct
the activities without the co-operation of the others so no investor individually
controls the investee and it is not a subsidiary. Each investor must account for its
interest in accordance with the relevant IFRSs, such as IFRS 11 Joint
Arrangements, IAS 28 Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures or IFRS 9
Financial Instruments.
Power
An investor has power over an investee when it has existing rights that give it the
current ability to direct the relevant activities (the activities that significantly affect
the investees returns). This power does not necessarily have to be exercised. As
long as the rights exist, all other things being equal, the investee is a subsidiary.
Power arises from rights.
Only substantive rights are taken into account. Substantive rights are rights that
an investor has the practical ability to exercise. Usually such rights must be
currently exercisable so that the entity is in a position to direct the relevant
activities of the other entity. However sometimes rights might be substantive,
even though they are not currently exercisable.
Example: Substantive rights
S Ltd. is an investee company.
Policies over the relevant activities can be changed only at special or scheduled
shareholders meetings. This includes the approval of material sales of assets as
well as the making or disposing of significant investments.
S Ltd. holds annual shareholder meetings at which decisions to direct the
relevant activities are made. The next scheduled shareholders meeting is in eight
months.
Shareholders that individually or collectively hold at least 5% of the voting rights
can call a special meeting to change the existing policies over the relevant
activities with 30 days notice.
X Ltd holds a majority of the voting rights in S Ltd. Are these rights substantive?
542
Answer
The rights are substantive and S Ltd is a subsidiary of X Ltd.
X Ltd is able to make decisions about the direction of the relevant activities when
they need to be made. The fact that it takes 30 days before it can exercise its
voting rights does not stop it from having the current ability to direct the relevant
activities.
Answer
The option contract is a substantive right that gives A Ltd the current ability to
direct the relevant activities of B Ltd.
A Ltd has rights that are essentially equivalent to those of a majority shareholder
in that it can make decisions about the direction of the relevant activities when
they need to be made.
The fact that it takes 30 days before it can exercise its votes does not stop it from
having the current ability to direct the relevant activities.
B Ltd is a subsidiary of A Ltd.
The parent itself (X) is a wholly-owned subsidiary, with its own parent (Y).
The parents debt or equity instruments are not traded in a public market.
543
The parent does not file its financial statements with a securities
commission for the purpose of issuing financial instruments in a public
market.
The parents own parent, or the ultimate parent company (for example, the
parent of the parents parent), does produce consolidated financial
statements for public use that comply with International Financial Reporting
Standards.
All subsidiaries?
Consolidated financial statements should include all the subsidiaries of the parent
from the date at which control is achieved to the date upon which control is lost.
A question might explain that a parent does not wish to consolidate a subsidiary
but it would usually have to do so. The following might be given as spurious
justification for failing to consolidate a particular subsidiary:
The subsidiarys activities are dissimilar from those of the parent, so that
the consolidated financial statements might not present the groups
financial performance and position fairly.
The subsidiary operates under severe long term restrictions, so that the
parent is unable to manage it properly. For example, a subsidiary might be
located in a country badly disrupted by a war or a revolution. However, note
that if the parent loses control then the investee is no longer a subsidiary
and should not be consolidated.
Sometimes a group is acquired and the new parent intends to sell one of the new
subsidiaries. In this case the subsidiary is accounted for as discontinued
operation according to the rules in IFRS 5. This means that all of its assets and
all of its liabilities are included as separate lines on the face of the statement of
financial position and the group share of its profit (or loss) is shown as a separate
line on the face of the statement of profit or loss.
Investment entities exemption
Under normal rules a parent must consolidate all controlled entities.
However, an investment entity might take shares in another entity in order to
make gains through dividends or capital appreciation, not to become involved in
business of that entity. Furthermore, an investment entity might hold shares in a
diverse range of businesses in very different sectors.
These rules apply to an entity whose business activity is primarily investing
activity for example, venture capitalists, unit trusts and mutual funds. Some
investments of such entities may result in control.
An investment entity must not consolidate the entities that it controls but it must
measure them at fair value through profit or loss in accordance with IFRS 9
Financial Instruments.
An entity is an investment entity only if it meets all of the following criteria:
544
The funds of its investors are pooled so that they can benefit from
professional investment management.
It has investors that are unrelated to the parent (if any), and in aggregate
hold a significant ownership interest in the entity.
Substantially all of the investments of the entity are managed, and their
performance is evaluated, on a fair value basis.
545
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
Section overview
546
Situation 2
A owns 100% of B
A is an investment entity
B provides services to A that relate to As investment activities.
A must consolidate B.
Situation 3
A owns 100% of B
Both A and B are investment entities
B provides services to A that relate to As investment activities.
The proposal is that A must not consolidate B but must measure its interest at
fair value through profit or loss.
Consolidation of investment entities
IFRS 10 states that a non-investment entity parent of an investment entity cannot
retain the fair value measurement applied by the investment entity to its interests
in subsidiaries. That non-investment entity parent must instead consolidate all
subsidiaries in the group.
Example: Consolidation of investment entities
A owns 100% of B
B owns 100% of C
B is an investment entity
B must not consolidate C but must measure it at fair value through profit or loss.
547
548
Introduction to IFRS 3
Acquisition method
Goodwill
disclosures that enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of
a business combination.
Transactions under common control are not within the scope of IFRS 3.This
means that transfers of ownership of a subsidiary within a group (for example in
group reconstructions) are not subject to the rules in this standard. Companies
engaging in such transactions must develop accounting policies in accordance
with the guidance given in IAS 8.
549
whose owners have the largest portion of the voting rights in the combined
entity;
that pays a premium over the pre-combination fair value of the equity
interests of the others
4.3 Goodwill
IFRS 3 is largely about the calculation of goodwill.
Definition: Goodwill
Goodwill: An asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other
assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and
separately recognised.
550
Rs.
X
Non-controlling interest
X
X
Goodwill recognised
Issues to address:
IFRS 3 gives guidance on:
the fair values, at the acquisition date, of the assets transferred by the
acquirer, such as cash
the liabilities incurred by the acquirer to the former owners of the acquiree
551
552
Contingent consideration
Sometimes the final cost of the combination is contingent on (depends on) a
future event. For example, an acquirer could agree to pay an additional amount if
the acquired subsidiarys profits exceed a certain level within three years of the
acquisition.
In a situation such as this, the contingent payment should be included in the cost
of the combination (discounted to present value if the payment will occur more
than 12 months in the future).
Under the rules of IFRS 3, contingent consideration must be recognised at fair
value at acquisition, even if it is not probable that the consideration will actually
have to be paid.
Example: Contingent consideration
Company X purchased 100% of the issued capital of Company S on 1 January
Year 4.
The purchase agreement required Company X to pay Rs. 300,000 in cash
immediately and an additional sum of Rs. 100,000 on 31 December Year 6 if the
earnings of Company S increase at an annual rate of 25% per year in each of the
three years following the acquisition.
How should the contingent payment be recognised in calculating the goodwill
arising at the date of acquisition?
Answer
The contingent consideration should be included in the cost of investment (the
purchase consideration) whether or not it is probable that it will have to be paid.
The contingent consideration of Rs. 100,000 should be measured at fair value.
If it is fairly certain that the contingent consideration will have to be paid, an
appropriate measure of fair value might be the present value of the future
payment, discounted at an appropriate cost of capital. The purchase
consideration is therefore Rs. 300,000 plus the present value of the contingent
(deferred) consideration.
If there is still contingent consideration at the end of an accounting period, it
might be necessary to re-measure it.
If the contingent consideration will be payable in cash, it should be re-measured
to fair value at the end of the reporting period. Any gain or loss on remeasurement should be taken to profit or loss.
If the contingent consideration will take the form of debt, the amount of the debt is
re-measured at fair value at the end of the reporting period and the change in
value is recognised in profit or loss in the period.
If the contingent consideration will take the form of equity, it is not re-measured at
the end of the reporting period. The eventual settlement of the payment will be
accounted for as an equity transaction (i.e. a transaction between the entity and
owners of the group in their capacity as owners).
553
a recognition principle;
a measurement principle.
554
financial position. If these assets are separately identifiable and can be measured
reliably, they should be included in the consolidated statement of financial
position as intangible assets, and accounted for as such.
This can result in the recognition of assets and liabilities not previously
recognised by the acquiree.
Illustration: Identifiable asset on acquisition
If a company bought 100% of the Coca-Cola Corporation they would be buying a lot
of assets but part (perhaps the largest part) of the purchase consideration would
be to buy the Coca Cola brand.
Coca Cola does not recognise its own brand in its own financial statements
because companies are not allowed to recognised internally generated brands.
However, as far as the company buying the Coca-Cola Corporation is concerned the
brand is a purchased asset. It would be recognised in the consolidated financial
statements and would be taken into account in the goodwill calculation.
Contingent liabilities
Many acquired businesses will contain contingent liabilities such as contingent
liabilities for the settlement of legal disputes or for warranty liabilities. IFRS 3
states that contingent liabilities should be recognised at acquisition even if it is
not probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be
required to settle the obligation.
The contingent liabilities should be measured at fair value at the acquisition date.
(Contingent assets are not recognised).
Restructuring costs
An acquirer should not recognise a liability for the cost of restructuring a
subsidiary or for any other costs expected to be incurred as a result of the
acquisition (including future losses).
This is because a plan to restructure a subsidiary after an acquisition cannot be a
liability at the acquisition date. For there to be a liability (and for a provision to be
recognised) there must have been a past obligating event. This can only be the
case if the subsidiary was already committed to the restructuring before the
acquisition.
This means that the acquirer cannot recognise a provision for restructuring or
reorganisation at acquisition and then release it to profit and loss in order to
smooth profits or reduce losses after the acquisition.
Measurement principle
Identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are measured at their
acquisition date fair values.
Definition: Fair value
Fair value: The price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date.
555
The net assets of a newly acquired business are subject to a fair valuation
exercise.
The table below shows how different types of asset and liability should be valued.
Item
Fair value
Marketable
investments
Non-marketable
investments
Inventories:
finished goods
Inventories: work
in progress
Inventories: raw
materials
Market value
Plant and
equipment
Intangible assets
As discussed above
556
Exceptions
Note that this table only shows the exceptions to the above principles and
guidance.
Topic
Recognition
principle
Measurement at
acquisition
Measurement at
later dates
Contingent
liability
Defined by IAS
37 and not
recognised.
Contingent
liability due to a
present obligation
is recognised
Fair value
At the higher of
the original
amount and the
amount that
would be reported
under IAS 37.
Income taxes
IAS 12 applies
IAS 12 applies
IAS 12 applies
Employee
benefits
IAS 19 applies
IAS 19 applies
IAS 19 applies
Indemnification
assets
This is a right to
be compensated
by the seller if a
defined
contingency
occurs
Recognition of
the asset mirrors
the recognition of
the liability
Measurement of
the asset mirrors
the recognition of
the liability
Measurement of
the asset mirrors
the recognition of
the liability
Reacquired rights
n/a
Recognised as an
intangible asset
and measured on
the basis of the
remaining
contractual term
of the related
contract
regardless of
whether market
participants would
consider potential
contractual
renewals in
determining its
fair value
The asset
recognised is
amortised over
the over the
remaining
contractual period
of the contract in
which the right
was granted.
Share based
payments
IFRS 2 applies
IFRS 5 applies
557
Deferred tax
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognised and measured in
accordance with IAS 12 Income Taxes, rather than at their acquisition-date fair
values.
Measurement period
Initial accounting for goodwill may be determined on a provisional basis and must
be finalised by the end of a measurement period.
This ends as soon as the acquirer receives the information it was seeking about
facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date but must not exceed
one year from the acquisition date.
During the measurement period new information obtained about facts and
circumstances that existed at the acquisition date might lead to the adjustment of
provisional amounts or recognition of additional assets or liabilities with a
corresponding change to goodwill.
Any adjustment restates the figures as if the accounting for the business
combination had been completed at the acquisition date.
Classification guidance
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed must be classified
(designated) as necessary at the acquisition date so as to allow subsequent
application of appropriate IFRS.
The classification is based on relevant circumstances as at the acquisition date
with two exceptions:
558
CONSOLIDATION TECHNIQUE
Section overview
Rs.
X
X
X
Goodwill recognised
559
Before consolidation
x
Construct a net assets summary of each subsidiary showing net assets at the
date of acquisition and at the reporting date.
During consolidation
x
After consolidation
x
560
P (Rs.)
S(Rs.)
Investment in S, at cost
450,000
Other assets
500,000
350,000
950,000
350,000
Share capital
100,000
100,000
Retained earnings
650,000
100,000
750,000
200,000
200,000
150,000
950,000
350,000
Equity
Current liabilities
Required
Prepare a consolidated statement of financial position as at 31
December 20X1.
561
Practice question
P (Rs.)
S(Rs.)
Investment in S, at cost
450,000
Other assets
500,000
350,000
950,000
350,000
Share capital
100,000
100,000
Retained earnings
650,000
100,000
750,000
200,000
200,000
150,000
950,000
350,000
Equity
Current liabilities
Required
Prepare a consolidated statement of financial position as at 31
December 20X1.
562
Practice question
1,800,000
Investment in S
1,000,000
Other assets
Share capital
Retained earnings
Liabilities
S(Rs.)
1,000,000
400,000
300,000
3,200,000
1,300,000
100,000
100,000
2,900,000
1,000,000
200,000
200,000
3,200,000
1,300,000
Required
Prepare a consolidated statement of financial position as at 31
December 20X1.
563
Practice question
Rs.
Rs.
PP and E
1,800,000
Investment in S
1,000,000
Other assets
Share capital
Retained earnings
Liabilities
1,000,000
400,000
300,000
3,200,000
1,300,000
100,000
100,000
2,900,000
1,000,000
200,000
200,000
3,200,000
1,300,000
Required
Prepare a consolidated statement of financial position as at 31
December 20X1.
564
Practice question
S(Rs.)
Assets:
Investment in S, at cost
1,000,000
400,000
200,000
Current assets
500,000
350,000
1,900,000
550,000
100,000
100,000
1,600,000
300,000
1,700,000
400,000
200,000
150,000
1,900,000
550,000
Equity
Share capital
Retained earnings
Current liabilities
Required
Prepare a consolidated statement of financial position as at 31
December 20X1.
565
566
the total net assets of the unit (parents interest and NCIs); and
Rs.
Cost of acquisition
Share of
Rs.1,500)
net
1,600
assets
(80%
Goodwill
(1,200)
400
400
Asset
1,500
300
567
Goodwill
As at 01/01/X1
Asset
Total
400
1,500
1,900
100
100
500
1,500
2,000
Recoverable amount
(1,520)
Impairment loss
480
The whole loss (480) is covered by the goodwill of 500 but only 80% of this
is in the financial statements. Therefore only 80% of the loss is recognised
Notional
write off
X Ltd
share
X Ltd write
off
480
80%
384
Goodwill
Asset
Total
1,500
1,900
As at 31/12/X1
400
Impairment loss
(384)
16
(384)
1,500
1,516
both the parents interest and the NCI in the net assets of the unit; and
both the parents interest in goodwill and the NCIs interest in goodwill.
When non-controlling interests are valued by the fair value method, any
impairment in the total goodwill after acquisition should be shared between the
parent company shareholders and the NCI.
It is tempting to allocate the write off of goodwill between the parent and NCI in
proportion to the goodwill attributable to each. However, para C6, Appendix C to
568
IAS 36 says that the impairment should be allocated between the parent and the
NCI on the same basis as that on which profit or loss is allocated.
Example: Impairment of goodwill
S has 10 million shares of Rs.1 each in issue. H acquired 80% of these shares at
a price of Rs.11.6 million when the net assets of S were Rs.10 million. Prior to
the acquisition, the shares of S had been trading in the stock market at Rs.1.20
per share.
Suppose that subsequently goodwill is impaired in value by Rs.1.5 million, so that
it is now valued at just Rs. 2,500,000.
The impairment in the goodwill must be attributed to the parent company and
the NCI in the according to the proportions used to allocate profit or loss (80:20).
Goodwill
Purchase consideration
Non-controlling interest
(2m shares @ Rs.1.2)
Total
Rs.000
Parent
Rs.000
11,600
11,600
2,400
NCI
Rs.000
2,400
14,000
Fair value of net assets of subsidiary at
acquisition
(10,000)
(8,000)
(2,000)
Goodwill
Impairment of goodwill:
4,000
(1,500)
3,600
(1,200)
400
(300)
2,500
2,400
100
Note that the impairment is allocated 80:20 not 3,600:400 which might have
been expected.
569
Share capital
Retained earnings
Net assets
At date of
consolidation
100,000
100,000
200,000*
At date of
acquisition
100,000
50,000
150,000
W2 Non--controlling interest
NCIs share of net assets at the date of acquisition
(30% u 150,000 (W1))
NCIs share of the post-acquisition retained earnings of S
(30% of 50,000 (W1))
NCIs share of net assets at the date of consolidation
Postacquisition
50,000
Rs.
45,000
15,000
60,000
Alternative working
NCIs share of net assets at the date of consolidation
(30% u 200,000*)
W3 Goodwill
60,000
Rs.
Cost of investment
450,000
45,000
495,000
(150,000)
345,000
Rs.
570
650,000
35,000
685,000
Solution
Rs.
375,000
850,000
1,225,000
100,000
685,000
785,000
90,000
875,000
350,000
1,225,000
At date of
acquisition
Share capital
Retained earnings
100,000
100,000
100,000
50,000
Net assets
200,000*
150,000
W2 Non--controlling interest
Postacquisition
50,000
Rs.
75,000
90,000
W3 Goodwill
15,000
Rs.
Cost of investment
450,000
75,000
525,000
(150,000)
375,000
Rs.
650,000
35,000
685,000
571
Solution
90,000
360,000
2,800,000
700,000
3,950,000
100,000
3,212,000
3,312,000
238,000
3,550,000
400,000
3,950,000
Non-controlling interest
Current liabilities (200 + 200)
Total equity and liabilities
Workings:
Net assets summary of S
Share capital
Retained earnings
Given in the question
Extra depreciation on brand
(100,000 2 years/20 years)
Consolidation reserve on
recognition of the brand
Net assets
At date of
consolidation
100,000
At date of
acquisition
1,000,000
600,000
(10,000)
990,000
600,000
100,000
100,000
1,190,000
800,000
Postacquisition
100,000
390,000
Rs.
Non--controlling interest
NCIs share of net assets at the date of acquisition
(20% u 800,000)
NCIs share of the post-acquisition retained earnings of S
(20% of 390,000 (see above))
160,000
238,000
572
78,000
Solution (continued)
3
Rs.
Goodwill
Cost of investment
1,000,000
160,000
1,160,000
(800,000)
360,000
Rs.
2,900,000
312,000
3,212,000
Rs.
Brand
On initial recognition
Depreciation since acquisition (100,000 2 years/20 years)
100,000
(10,000)
90,000
Solution
573
Solution (continued)
Share capital
4
At date of
consolidation
100,000
At date of
acquisition
100,000
Postacquisition
Retained earnings
Given in the question
Extra depreciation on fair
value adjustment (300 2
years/10 years) see
explanation on next page
Fair value reserve
Net assets
1,000,000
600,000
(60,000)
940,000
600,000
300,000
300,000
1,340,000
1,000,000
Non--controlling interest
NCIs share of net assets at the date of acquisition
(20% u 1,000)
NCIs share of the post-acquisition retained earnings of S
(20% of 340 (see above))
NCIs share of net assets at the date of consolidation
340,000
Rs.
200,000
68,000
268,000
Rs.
Goodwill
Cost of investment
1,000,000
200,000
1,200,000
(1,000,000)
200,000
Rs.
2,900,000
272,000
3,172,000
574
Solution (continued)
4
Rs.
1,800
Subsidiarys
Given in question
1,000
300
(60)
1,240
3,040
Solution
575
Rs.
720,000
825,000
850,000
2,395,000
100,000
1,757,500
1,857,500
187,500
2,045,000
350,000
2,395,000
Solution
Workings:
W1 Net assets summary
Share capital
At date of
consolidation
100,000
At date of
acquisition
100,000
Postacquisition
Retained earnings
Given in the question
300,000
50,000
(25,000)
275,000
50,000
250,000
250,000
Net assets
625,000
400,000
W2 Non--controlling interest
225,000
Rs.
120,000
67,500
187,500
Rs..
Cost of investment
1,000,000
120,000
1,120,000
(400,000)
720,000
Rs.
1,600,000
157,500
1,757,500
576
CHAPTER
20
577
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
578
Chapter 20: Consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
Inter-company items
Other adjustments
non-controlling interests.
The figure for NCI is simply their share of the subsidiarys profit for the year that
has been included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
The amounts attributable to the owners of the parent and the non-controlling
interest are shown as a metric (small table) immediately below the statement of
comprehensive income.
Illustration: Amounts attributable to the owners of the parent and the non-controlling interest
Profit attributable to:
Owners of the parent (balancing figure)
Non-controlling interests (x% of y)
Rs.
X
X
X
Where:
579
Credit
Debit
X
Credit
X
580
Chapter 20: Consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
Credit
X
X
Inter-company dividends
The parent may have accounted for dividend income from a subsidiary. This is
cancelled on consolidation.
Dividends received from a subsidiary are ignored in the consolidation of the
statement of comprehensive income because the profit out of which they are paid
has already been consolidated.
581
Practice question
P acquired 80% of S 3 years ago. Goodwill on acquisition was Rs. 80,000. The
recoverable amount of goodwill at the year-end was estimated to be Rs. 65,000.
This was the first time that the recoverable amount of goodwill had fallen below
the amount at initial recognition.
S sells goods to P. The total sales in the year were Rs. 100,000. At the year-end P
retains inventory from S which had cost S Rs. 30,000 but was in Ps books at Rs.
35,000.
The distribution costs of S include depreciation of an asset which had been
subject to a fair value increase of Rs. 100,000 on acquisition. This asset is being
written off on a straight line basis over 10 years.
The statements of profit or loss for the year to 31 December 20X1 are as follows:
P
Rs.(000)
1,000
(400)
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Distribution costs
Administrative expenses
S
Rs.(000)
800
(250)
600
(120)
(80)
550
(75)
(20)
Dividend from S
Finance cost
400
80
(25)
455
(15)
455
(45)
440
(40)
410
400
All of an entitys results are consolidated if it is controlled for the whole year
If an entity is controlled for only part of the year, only those results that
relate to that part of the year are consolidated.
For example, if a parent acquires a subsidiary during a financial year, the profits
of the subsidiary have to be divided into pre-acquisition and post-acquisition and
only post acquisition profits are consolidated.
582
Chapter 20: Consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
The following straightforward example is of a type that you have seen in previous
papers. Later chapters on step acquisitions and disposals will show more
complex applications of the principle.
Example: Consolidated statement of profit or loss (mid-year acquisition)
Entity P acquired 80% of S on 1 October 20X1.
The statements of profit or loss for the year to 31 December 20X1 are as follows:
Revenue
Cost of sales
P
Rs.
400,000
(200,000)
S
Rs.
260,000
(60,000)
Gross profit
Other income
200,000
20,000
200,000
-
Distribution costs
Administrative expenses
(50,000)
(90,000)
(30,000)
(95,000)
80,000
(30,000)
75,000
(15,000)
50,000
60,000
Working
S (3/12)
Consolidated
Revenue
Cost of sales
Rs.
400,000
(200,000)
Rs.
65,000
(15,000)
Rs.
465,000
(215,000)
Gross profit
Other income
Distribution costs
200,000
20,000
(50,000)
50,000
(7,500)
250,000
20,000
(57,500)
Administrative
expenses
(90,000)
(23,750)
(113,750)
80,000
(30,000)
18,750
(3,750)
98,750
(33,750)
50,000
15,000
65,000
62,000
3,000
65,000
583
IAS 1 allows an entity to present the two sections in a single statement or in two
separate statements.
Information to be presented in the other comprehensive income section
The other comprehensive income section must present line items for amounts of
other comprehensive income in the period, classified by nature (including share
of the other comprehensive income of associates and joint ventures accounted
for using the equity method) and grouped into those that, in accordance with
other IFRSs:
584
Chapter 20: Consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
non-controlling interests.
Rs.
X
X
X
585
Rs.
400,000
(200,000)
Rs.
260,000
(60,000)
Gross profit
Expenses
200,000
(90,000)
200,000
(95,000)
110,000
105,000
(30,000)
(15,000)
80,000
90,000
2,000
1,000
(1,200)
400
800
1,400
80,800
91,400
586
Chapter 20: Consolidated statements of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
S
Rs.
Consolidated
Rs.
Revenue
Cost of sales
400,000
(200,000)
260,000
(60,000)
660,000
(260,000)
Gross profit
200,000
200,000
400,000
Expenses
(90,000)
(95,000)
(185,000)
(30,000)
(15,000)
215,000
(45,000)
80,000
90,000
170,000
2,000
1,000
3,000
(1,200)
400
(800)
800
1,400
2,200
91,400
172,200
Other comprehensive
income
Items that will not be
reclassified
Remeasurement of
defined benefit
plan
Items that may be
reclassified ..
Cash flow hedge
Other comprehensive
income for the year
Total comprehensive
income for the year
152,000
18,000
170,000
62,000
18,820
153,380
587
Dr
Rs.(000)
(100)
3(5)
Cr
Rs.(000)
Rs.(000)
Revenue
Cost of sales
P
Rs.(000)
1,000
(400)
100
1,700
(555)
Gross profit
600
550
(105)
100
1,145
Distribution costs
Fair value adjustment
(120)
Consol.
(75)
1(10)
(120)
(85)
(205)
Administrative
expenses
(80)
(20)
2(15)
Dividend from S
Finance cost
400
80
(25)
445
(15)
(80)
455
430
785
Tax
(45)
(40)
(85)
410
390
(115)
(40)
(200)
100
700
Rs.(000)
633
77
700
Notes:
1: Extra depreciation on fair value adjustment (100/10 years)
2: Goodwill impairment
3: Unrealised profit
588
CHAPTER
21
Contents
1 IFRS 11: Joint arrangements
2 IAS 28: Investments in associates and joint ventures
589
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
A5
590
Introduction
Joint arrangements
1.1 Introduction
A controlling interest in an investee results in an investment (a subsidiary) which
is consolidated.
An interest in the equity shares of another company that gives no influence is
accounted for as follows:
Any dividends received for the shares are included in profit or loss for the
year as other income.
Other investments might result in joint control or significant influence. The rules
for accounting for these are given in:
Definition
A party to a joint arrangement is an entity that participates in a joint
arrangement, regardless of whether that entity has joint control of the
arrangement.
591
Contractual arrangement
Any contractual arrangement will usually be evidenced in writing, usually in the
form of a contract or documented discussions between the parties.
A joint arrangement might be structured through a separate vehicle in which case
some aspects of the contractual arrangement might be incorporated in its
articles, charter or by-laws.
Any contractual arrangement sets out the terms upon which the parties
participate in the activity that is the subject of the arrangement and would
generally deal with such matters as:
how the parties share assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses or profit or loss
relating to the joint arrangement.
Joint control
IFRS 11 states that decisions about the relevant activities require unanimous
consent of all parties that collectively control the arrangement. It is not necessary
for every party to the arrangement to agree in order for unanimous consent to
exist. This requires agreement by only those parties that collectively control the
arrangement.
Day to day decision making might be delegated to a manager or to one of the
parties to the arrangement. In such cases, the situation would need to be
analysed to decide whether, in fact, decisions require the unanimous agreement
of the interested parties. Such an arrangement is still a joint arrangement when
the manager executes the policy decisions that have been agreed unanimously
by the investors.
Example: Joint control
In each of the following scenarios three entities A, B and C establish an
arrangement.
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Scenario 3
Require the
Decisions
Require at
Require at least
unanimous
about relevant
least 75% of
75% of voting
consent of A, B
rights
activities
voting rights
and C
Ownership
interest
A
50%
50%
50%
B
30%
30%
25%
C
20%
20%
25%
592
Required
For each scenario analyse whether a joint arrangement exists and which parties
have joint control.
Answer
Scenario 1
A, B and C have joint control of the arrangement and each must account for its
investment according to IFRS 11.
Scenario 2
Although A can block any decision, it does not control the arrangement because it
needs the agreement of B.
A and B have joint control of the arrangement. The terms of their contractual
arrangement requiring at least 75% of the voting rights to make decisions about
the relevant activities imply that A and B have joint control of the arrangement
because decisions about the relevant activities of the arrangement cannot be
made without both A and B agreeing.
A and B must each account for its investment according to IFRS 11.
C is a party to a joint arrangement but has no control.
Scenario 3
The arrangement can be controlled by A with B or by A with C. This means that no
party can be said to have joint control.
In order for this to be a joint arrangement the contractual terms would have to
specify which combination of parties is required to agree about the relevant
activities.
IFRS 11 does not apply to this investment.
593
Definition
A separate vehicle is a separately identifiable financial structure, including
separate legal entities or entities recognised by statute, regardless of whether
those entities have a legal personality.
The application guidance to IFRS 11 says that if a joint arrangement is not
structured through a separate vehicle it must be a joint operation.
If a joint arrangement is structured through a separate vehicle it could be a joint
operation or a joint venture.
For a joint arrangement to be a joint venture it is the separate vehicle that must
have the rights to the assets and the obligations to the liabilities with the investor
only having an interest in the net assets of the entity. If an investor has a direct
interest in specific assets and direct obligation for specific liabilities of the
separate vehicle then the joint arrangement is a joint operation.
its revenue from the sale of its share of the output arising from the joint
operation;
its share of the revenue from the sale of the output by the joint operation;
and
If an entity participates in, but does not have joint control of a joint operation but
has rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the joint
operation it must also apply the above accounting treatment.
If an entity participates in, but does not have joint control of a joint operation and
also does not have rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating
to the joint operation it must account for its interest in the joint operation in
accordance with the IFRSs applicable to that interest.
Amendment to IFRS 11
The amendment must be applied for annual periods beginning on or after 1
January 2016. Earlier application is permitted but must be disclosed.
When an entity acquires an interest in a joint operation in which the activity of the
joint operation constitutes a business (as defined in IFRS 3), it must apply the
principles on business combinations accounting in IFRS 3.
594
This applies to the acquisition of both the initial interest and additional interests in
a joint operation.
The principles on business combinations include:
Joint ventures
A joint venturer must recognise its interest in a joint venture as an investment and
account for it using the equity method in accordance with IAS 28 Investments in
Associates and Joint Ventures unless the entity is exempted from applying the
equity method as specified in that standard.
If an entity participates in, but does not have joint control of a joint operation it
must account for its interest in the arrangement in accordance with IFRS 9
Financial Instruments, unless it has significant influence over the joint venture, in
which case it must account for it in accordance with IAS 28.
Example Accounting for a joint operation
On 1 January 20X7, X and Y entered into a joint operation to purchase and
operate an oil pipeline.
Both entities contributed equally to the purchase cost of Rs.20 million and this
was financed by a joint loan of Rs.20,000,000.
Contract terms
Y carries out all maintenance work on the pipeline but maintenance expenses are
shared between X and Y in the ratio 40%: 60%.
Both entities use the pipeline for their own operations and share any income from
third parties 50%: 50%. Sales to third parties are invoiced by Y.
The full interest on the loan is initially paid by X but the expense is to be shared
equally.
During the year ended 31 December 20X7
Y carried out maintenance at a cost of Rs. 1,200,000.
Income from third parties was Rs. 900,000, all paid to Y.
Interest of Rs. 1,500,000 was paid for the year on 31 December by X.
Required
Show the relevant figures that would be recognised in the financial statements of
X and Y for the year to 31 December 20X7.
595
Answer
Total
amount
In X
financial
statements
In Y
financial
statements
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
Jointly--controlled assets
Property, plant and equipment
Cost
720,000
720,000
900,000
450,000
450,000
1,200,000
1,500,000
480,000
750,000
720,000
750,000
Share of expenses
Maintenance costs (40:60)
Interest on loan (50:50)
2,700,000
Workings
Statement of profit or loss
Income from third parties (50:50)
Maintenance costs (40:60)
Interest on loan (50:50)
1,230,000 1,470,000
900,000
450,000
450,000
1,200,000
1,500,000
480,000
750,000
720,000
750,000
(780,000) (1,020.000)
(1,500,000)(1,200,000)
900,000
(1,500,000) (300,000)
720,000
596
(720,000)
IAS 28 states that if an entity holds 20% or more of the voting power
(equity) of another entity, it is presumed that significant influence exists,
and the investment should be treated as an associate.
If an entity owns less than 20% of the equity of another entity, the normal
presumption is that significant influence does not exist.
Holding 20% to 50% of the equity of another entity therefore means as a general
rule that significant influence exists, but not control; therefore the investment is
treated as an associate, provided that it is not a joint venture.
The 20% or more rule is a general guideline, however, and IAS 28 states more
specifically how significant influence arises. The existence of significant influence
is usually evidenced in one or more of the following ways:
597
X
X
(X)
X
Share of profits of associate (or JV) in the profit and loss section of the
statement
598
Investment at cost
Investors share of post-acquisition profits of A (W
W1)
Rs.
147,000
75,000
222,000
Rs.
600,000
(350,000)
250,000
30%
Rs.75,000
599
Practice question
Inter-company balances (amounts owed between the parent (or group) and
the associate (or JV) in either direction); and
The accounting rules for dealing with these items for associate (or JVs) are
different from the rules for subsidiaries.
Inter-company balances
Inter-company balances between the members of a group (parent and
subsidiaries) are cancelled out on consolidation.
Inter-company balances between the members of a group (parent and
subsidiaries) and associates (or JVs) are not cancelled out on consolidation. An
associate (or JV) is not a member of the group but is rather an investment made
by the group. This means that it is entirely appropriate that consolidated financial
statements show amounts owed by the external party as an asset and amount
owed to the external party as a liability.
This is also the case if a parent has an associate (or JV) and no subsidiaries. The
parent must equity account for the investment. Once again, it is entirely
appropriate that consolidated financial statements show amounts owed by the
external party as an asset and amount owed to the external party as a liability.
600
The unrealised profit is held in inventory of the associate (or JV). The
investment in the associate (or JV) should be reduced by the parents share
of the unrealised profit.
Credit
Investment in associate
The unrealised profit is held in inventory of the parent and this should be
reduced in value by the parents share of the unrealised profit.
The other side of the entry reduces the parents share of the profit of the
associate (or JV).
Credit
Inventory
In both cases, there will also be a reduction in the post-acquisition profits of the
associate (or JV), and the investor entitys share of those profits (as reported in
profit or loss). This will reduce the accumulated profits in the statement of
financial position.
601
200,000
100,000
15,000
6,000
Double entries:
Dr(Rs.)
Cr(Rs.)
Investment in associate
110,000
Accumulated profits
110,000
Being: Share of post-acquisition profits (40% of Rs.275,000)
Dr(Rs.)
6,000
Cr(Rs.)
6,000
Rs.
205,000
110,000
(6,000)
309,000
602
Practice question
Entity P acquired 30% of the equity shares of Entity A several years ago at a
cost of Rs. 275,000.
As at 31 December Year 6 Entity A had made profits of Rs. 380,000 since
the date of acquisition.
In the year to 31 December Year 6, the reported profits after tax of Entity A
were Rs. 100,000.
In the year to 31 December Year 6, Entity P sold goods to Entity A for Rs.
180,000 at a mark-up of 20% on cost.
Goods which had cost Entity A Rs. 60,000 were still held as inventory by
Entity A at the year-end.
a)
b)
c)
603
The figures that must be included to account for the associate in the financial
statements of Entity P for the year to 31 December Year 5 are as follows:
Statement of financial position:
The investment in the associate is as follows:
Investment at cost
Investors share of post-acquisition profits of A (W
W1)
Minus: Accumulated impairment in the investment
Rs.
128,000
60,000
(8,000)
180,000
Rs.
400,000
(250,000)
150,000
40%
Rs.60,000
604
Solution
a)
2
Rs.
180,000
30,000
10,000
3,000
Double entry
Dr(Rs.)
Cost of sales (hence accumulated profit)
3,000
Investment in associate
Being: Elimination of share of unrealised profit (see above)
b)
Cr(Rs.)
3,000
Rs.
275,000
114,000
(3,000)
386,000
c)
605
606
CHAPTER
22
Business combinations
achieved in stages
Contents
1 Acquisitions achieved in stages
2 Pattern of ownership in the consolidated statement of
profit or loss
607
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
608
Rs.
X
X
X
X
(X)
Goodwill recognised
609
The resulting gain or loss on the remeasurement of the previously held equity
interest is recognised in profit or loss or other comprehensive income, as
appropriate.
Example: Step acquisition
H bought 10% of S 2 years ago for Rs. 45m. The balance on Ss retained earnings
was Rs. 150m at this date.
H bought 60% of S 1 year ago for Rs. 540m. The balance on Ss retained earnings
was Rs. 300m at this date and S held a non-current asset with a fair value of Rs.
150m more than its carrying amount.
The fair value of the original investment (10%) in S was Rs. 60m at this date.
Statements of financial position for H and S as at 31 December 20X1:
Assets:
Investment in S:
First holding (10%)
Second holding (60%)
Rs. m
Rs. m
45
540
585
2,500
650
3,085
650
Equity
Share capital
Retained earnings
100
2,485
100
500
Current liabilities
2,585
500
600
50
3,085
650
Other assets
3,515
100
2,640
2,740
225
2,965
550
3,515
610
At date of
acquisition
Postacquisition
Share capital
Retained earnings
100
500
100
300
200
150
150
Net assets
750
550
Non--controlling interest
Rs. m
165
60
225
Rs. m
Cost of investment
Cost of second purchase (60%)
540
60
600
165
765
(550)
215
Rs. m
Hs retained earnings
Per the question
Gain on remeasurement of previously held equity interest in S
(60 45)
2,485
15
2,500
140
2,640
611
Practice question
Retained
profits
Rs.
1 January Year 1
40,000 shares
180,000
500,000
30 June Year 4
120,000 shares
780,000
800,000
Practice question
Retained
profits
Rs.
1 January Year 1
40,000 shares
180,000
500,000
30 June Year 4
120,000 shares
780,000
800,000
612
Consideration paid
Rs.
X
(X)
Equity adjustment
The reduction in non-controlling interest at the date of the purchase is the share
of net assets given up by the non-controlling interest at that date. This requires a
working to show the net assets of the subsidiary at that date.
This is very similar to the goodwill working but this figure is not goodwill. Goodwill
arises at the acquisition date (the date at which control is achieved).
Non-controlling interest (NCI)
The NCI in the statement of financial position at the reporting date is based on
the percentage holdings at that date.
Group policy might be to measure NCI as a proportionate share of net assets at
the acquisition date. In this case the NCI at the reporting date can be easily
measured as the NCI share of assets at that date.
If group policy is to measure NCI at fair value at the acquisition date the
calculation can be quite tricky. In this case, you have to start with the NCI at the
acquisition date and adjust it by the appropriate NCI share of profits since that
date. This must be adjusted by NCI share of profits sold at the date of the second
purchase by the parent.
Illustration: Non-controlling interest (NCI)
Rs.
NCI at the date of acquisition (Original NCI % u Net assets at that
date)
This is best demonstrated using figures and is shown in the following example.
Consolidated retained earnings
This must be calculated in the usual way by adding the parents share of the
subsidiarys post acquisition retained profits to those of the parent but
remembering to make the equity adjustment.
The parents share of the subsidiarys post acquisition retained profits must be
measured as two figures.
613
X
X
Equity adjustment
X/(X)
X
Again this is best demonstrated using figures and is shown in the following
example. Work through it carefully.
Example: Purchase of additional equity interest after control is achieved
H bought 60% of S 2 years ago for Rs. 540m. The balance on Ss retained earnings
was Rs. 150m.
H bought 10% of S 1 year ago for Rs. 45m. The balance on Ss retained earnings
was Rs. 300m at this date.
Statements of financial position H and S as at 31 December 20X1:
H
Rs. m
585
2,500
Assets:
Investment in S:
Other assets
S
Rs. m
650
3,085
650
Equity
Share capital
Retained earnings
100
2,485
100
500
Current liabilities
2,585
500
600
50
3,085
650
The NCI was 40% at the date of the first acquisition and remained the same
until the date of the second purchase at which time it changed to 30%;
614
3,540
100
2,710
2,810
180
2,990
550
3,540
1 year ago
2 years ago
Share capital
100
100
100
Retained earnings
500
300
150
Net assets
600
400
250
Rs. m
180
615
Rs. m
540
100
640
(250)
390
W4: Equity adjustment
Rs. m
Cost of investment
45
(40)
5
Rs. m
Hs retained earnings
2,485
Equity adjustment W4
(5)
210
20
2,710
Rs. m
100
60
160
616
(40)
60
180
Practice question
Retained
profits
Rs.
1 January Year 1
120,000 shares
600,000
500,000
30 June Year 4
40,000 shares
270,000
800,000
Practice question
1 January Year 1
30 June Year 4
120,000 shares
40,000 shares
Rs.
Retained
profits
Rs.
600,000
270,000
500,000
800,000
617
Introduction
Step acquisition
2.1 Introduction
The pattern of ownership must be reflected in the statement of profit or loss and
other comprehensive income.
A change in ownership in the period will have an impact on the consolidated
statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income.
Illustration: Pattern of ownership
Date of
acquisition
Situation 1 is the basic situation which you will have seen before. The results
must be consolidated from the date that control is achieved.
Situations 2 to 4 are explained in more detail in the following sections
618
Revenue
Cost of sales
H
Rs. m
10,000
(7,000)
S
Rs. m
6,000
(4,800)
Gross profit
Expenses
3,000
(1,000)
1,200
(300)
2,000
(500)
900
(160)
1,500
740
Working
S (3/12)
Consolidated
Revenue
Cost of sales
Rs.
10,000
(7,000)
Rs.
1,500
(1,200)
Rs.
11,500
(8,200)
Gross profit
Expenses
3,000
(1,000)
300
(75)
3,300
(1,075)
(500)
(40)
2,225
(540)
1,500
185
1,685
1,629
56
1,685
619
Revenue
Cost of sales
H
Rs. m
10,000
(7,000)
S
Rs. m
6,000
(4,800)
Gross profit
Expenses
3,000
(1,000)
1,200
(300)
2,000
(500)
900
(160)
1,500
740
Revenue
Cost of sales
H
Rs.
10,000
(7,000)
S
Rs.
6,000
(4,800)
Consolidated
Rs.
16,000
(11,800)
Gross profit
Expenses
3,000
(1,000)
1,200
(300)
4,200
(1,300)
2,000
(500)
900
(160)
2,900
(660)
1,500
740
2,240
1,962
222
56
278
2,240
620
Revenue
Cost of sales
H
Rs. m
10,000
(7,000)
S
Rs. m
6,000
(4,800)
Gross profit
Expenses
3,000
(1,000)
1,200
(300)
2,000
(500)
900
(160)
1,500
740
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Expenses
Share of profit of
associate
(40% u 9/12 u 740)
Working
H
S (3/12)
Rs.
Rs.
10,000
1,500
(7,000)
(1,200)
3,000
(1,000)
300
(75)
Consolidated
Rs.
11,500
(8,200)
3,300
(1,075)
222
2,447
(500)
(40)
(540)
1,500
185
1,907
1,851
56
1,907
621
250,000
780,000
1,030,000
(800,000)
Goodwill
230,000
Solution
A step acquisition occurs in June Year 4. The original investment is revalued at fair
value.
Rs.
Cost of original investment
180,000
60,000
240,000
(250,000)
(10,000)
Solution
Goodwill is calculated when control is acquired (IFRS 3). This is on purchase of the
first investment.
Rs.
Fair value of original investment
600,000
(420,000)
Goodwill
180,000
622
Solution
4
Dr
Rs. 70,000
Rs. 200,000
Cr
Rs. 270,000
The acquisition of the extra 40,000 shares does not affect control of Company S, and
it is therefore accounted for as an equity transaction between equity owners of the
company in their capacity as owners. IAS 27 states that any difference between
cash paid and the adjustment made to NCI is attributed to parent equity
623
624
CHAPTER
23
Complex groups
Contents
1 Introduction
2 Consolidation of sub-subsidiaries (two stage method)
3 Consolidation of mixed groups
4 Other issues
625
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
A3
626
INTRODUCTION
Section overview
Explanation
H Ltd has a direct interest in S Ltd and an indirect interest in T Ltd
(exercised via S Ltds holding in T Ltd).
T Ltd is a subsidiary of H Ltd because H Ltd has a controlling interest in S
Ltd and S Ltd has a controlling interest in T Ltd.
This is a vertical group consisting of H Ltd, S Ltd and T Ltd.
T Ltd is said to be a sub-subsidiary of H Ltd.
In practice, structures can be much more complex than this with groups
comprised of many layers of companies. However, they will be consolidated by
applying the same principles as explained in this chapter for the relatively
straightforward vertical group structure shown above.
Another group structure that could be examined is a mixed group (also known as
a D-shaped group).
627
Explanation
H Ltd and S Ltd between them own more than 50% of T Ltd (the fact that S
Ltd is not a wholly-owned subsidiary of H Ltd is irrelevant).
H Ltd controls T Ltd because it owns 40% directly and because it controls
another 20% through its control of S Ltd.
You may also come across examples where there is a sub-associate. This will be
covered in a later section of this chapter.
Status of the investment
The starting point in any question involving a complex structure is to draw a
diagram of the group and then decide on the status of the bottom company in
relation to the ultimate parent.
The bottom company will either be a sub-subsidiary as shown above or a subassociate. The status of the bottom investment is always decided in terms of
whether H can exercise control or significant influence either directly or indirectly.
The date of acquisition of the sub-subsidiary is the later of the date on which the
main subsidiary (S) was purchased by the parent and the date on which the subsubsidiary (T) was purchased by the main subsidiary (S).
In other words:
628
Explanation
H acquired 75% of S on 1 January 20X1.
S acquired 60% of T two years later on 1 January 20X3.
H acquired control of T when S bought its interest on 1 January 20X3.
Therefore, the date of acquisition of T Ltd from H Ltds viewpoint is 1
January 20X3.
Explanation
H acquired 75% of S on 1 January 20X3.
S already held 60% of T.
H therefore acquired control of S and T at the same date.
Therefore, the date of acquisition of T Ltd from H Ltds viewpoint is 1
January 20X3.
629
Rationale for splitting the cost of investment when using the direct method
Other assets
Investment in S
Investment in T
Share capital
Retained profits
Liabilities
S Ltd
Rs. 000
110
T Ltd
Rs. 000
100
400
80
190
100
200
100
100
400
100
60
30
190
50
30
20
100
630
50
At date of
acquisition
50
Retained profits
30
25
Net assets
80
75
W2
2: Goodwill (on acquisition of T)
Postacquisition
5
Rs. 000
Cost of investment
80.00
30.00
110.00
(75.00)
35.00
W3
3: NCI in T
NCIs share of net assets at the date of acquisition
(40% u 75)
NCIs share of the post-acquisition retained profits of S
(40% of 5 (W1))
30.00
2.00
32.00
W4
4: Consolidated retained profits:
All of Ss retained profits
Ss share of the post-acquisition retained profits of T
(60% of 5 (W1))
60.00
3.00
63.00
631
At date of
acquisition
100
Postacquisition
63
40
23
Net assets
163
140
Share capital
Rs. 000
Cost of investment
120.00
35.00
155.00
(140.00)
15.00
W3: NCI in S
NCIs share of net assets of at the date of acquisition
(25% u 140)
NCIs share of the post-acquisition retained profits of S
(25% of 23 (W1))
35.00
5.75
40.75
100.00
17.25
117.25
632
Comment
H Ltd will consolidate a 75% of interest in S Ltd. The non-controlling
interest in S Ltd is 25%.
H Ltd will consolidate a 45% of interest in S Ltd. The non-controlling
interest in S Ltd is 55% (taken as a balancing figure).
Do not be confused by the existence of a non-controlling interest of 55%.
Remember that we have already established that T is a subsidiary of H.
The effective interests are mathematical conveniences which allow us to
produce the consolidation. (Ownership and control are two separate
issues).
The main subsidiary is consolidated by the parent in the usual way.
The sub-subsidiary is also consolidated by the parent in the usual way using the
effective holding with one further adjustment. The cost of investment in T is split.
Hs share is used in the goodwill working and the balance is charged to the noncontrolling interest.
To illustrate, in the next example the cost of investment in T is Rs. 80,000. This
number is split so that Hs share of Rs. 60,000 (75% u Rs. 80,000) is the cost
used in the goodwill calculation and the balance Rs. 20,000 (25% u Rs. 80,000)
is a deduction from the non-controlling interest.
633
Other assets
Investment in S
Investment in T
Share capital
Retained profits
Liabilities
S Ltd
Rs. 000
110
T Ltd
Rs. 000
100
400
80
190
100
200
100
100
400
100
60
30
190
50
30
20
100
634
At date of
acquisition
Retained profits
60
40
Net assets
160
140
Share capital
Postacquisition
100
20
At date of
acquisition
50
Postacquisition
5
Retained profits
30
25
Net assets
80
75
W2: Goodwill
Rs. 000
On acquisition of S
Cost of investment
120.00
35.00
155.00
(140.00)
15.00
On acquisition of T
Cost of investment (75% u 80)
60.00
41.25
101.25
(75.00)
26.25
Total goodwill
41.25
635
Rs. 000
35.00
5.00
40.00
NCI in T
NCIs share of net assets of at the date of acquisition
(55% u 75(W1b))
NCIs share of the post-acquisition retained profits of S
(55% of 5 (W1b))
41.25
2.75
44.00
(20.00)
24.00
Total NCI
64.00
Rs.
100.00
15.00
2.25
117.25
636
2.4 Rationale for splitting the cost of investment when using the direct method
Goodwill
Goodwill is the difference between the cost of investment and the share of net
assets acquired. This is not obvious from the format of the calculation but it can
be rearranged to demonstrate this as follows:
Example: Goodwill on acquisition
Returning to the facts of the previous example:
Goodwill on acquisition of S
Rs. 000
Cost of investment
120.00
35.00
155.00
(140.00)
15.00
120.00
140.00
(35.00)
(75% u 140)
105.00
15.00
The effective interest is the parents share of the main subsidiaries share of the
sub-subsidiary.
Goodwill calculated for the main subsidiary is cost less share of net assets.
Goodwill calculated for the sub-subsidiary must be the share of cost less
share of share of net assets.
637
Non-controlling interest
In previous examples, the NCI in the sub-subsidiary was calculated as a
balancing figure. It is possible to prove this figure in terms of the shareholdings of
the main subsidiary and the sub-subsidiary.
Illustration: Non-controlling interest
Comment
H Ltd has an effective interest of 45% of T (75% u 60%).
The NCI is 55% (taken as a balancing figure).
The NCI in the sub-subsidiary is made up of the following:
NCI in T
40%
15%
55%
638
Practice question
H (R
Rs.)
Investment in S
S(R
Rs.)
T((Rs.))
5,000
Investment in T
750
Other assets
11,900
6,000
1,500
16,900
6,750
1,500
10,000
3,000
300
Retained profits
4,900
2,750
700
Liabilities
2,000
1,000
500
16,900
6,750
1,500
Equity
Share capital
2,300
650
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position for the H Group
as at 31 December 20X7.
639
Practice question
H (R
Rs. 000)
Investment in S
S(R
Rs. 000)
T((Rs. 000)
3,300
Investment in T
2,200
Other assets
3,700
2,400
3,500
7,000
4,600
3,500
Share capital
4,000
2,500
2,000
Retained profits
2,000
1,100
1,000
Liabilities
1,000
1,000
500
7,000
4,600
1,500
Equity
31 December 20X7
Date
1 January 20X7
700
320
31 December 20X7
960
2,000
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position for the H Group
as at 31 December 20X8.
640
Mixed groups
Effective interest in mixed groups
It also has an indirect interest in T, through its control of S, which also owns
shares in T.
The group interest in the sub-subsidiary T is the sum of the direct interest and the
indirect interest in T as follows:
Illustration: Mixed group Effective interest in sub-subsidiary
Hs direct holding in T
40%
12%
Hs effective holding in T
52%
48%
100%
641
Commentary
H obtains control of S on 1 May 20X1.
H obtains control of T on 1 May 20X3 when S acquires its stake in T.
From 1 May 20X2 to 1 May 20X3, T is an associate of H.
From 1 May 20X3 onwards T is a subsidiary of H and H has an effective
holding of 66% (30% + (80% 45%)) in T.
Commentary
H achieves significant influence over T on 1 May 20X2.
H obtains control of S on 1 May 20X4. Thus H also obtains control of T. due
to gaining indirect control over Ss holding in T.
From 1 May 20X2 to 1 May 20X4, T is an associate of H.
From 1 May 20X4 onwards T is a subsidiary of H.
The above illustrations show that there is a further complication that must be
taken into account when consolidating mixed groups. If Hs direct and indirect
interests in the sub-subsidiary arise on different dates the step acquisition rules
apply.
642
H (R
Rs. 000)
S(R
Rs.000))
T((Rs.0
000)
Investment in S
5,000
Investment in T
1,000
1,750
11,900
9,000
2,400
17,900
10,750
2,400
10,000
3,000
300
Retained profits
5,900
4,750
1,600
Liabilities
2,000
3,000
500
17,900
10,750
2,400
Other assets
Equity
Share capital
Retained
profits of T
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
1 June 20X1
15 October 20X2
2,000
2,300
500
650
1 May 20X3
3,000
800
Date
The fair value of Hs 10% holding in T was Rs. 1,500,000 on 1 May 20X3.
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position for the H Group
as at 31 December 20X7.
643
3,394
23,300
26,694
10,000
8,968
18,968
2,226
21,194
5,500
26,694
10%
36%
Effective holding
46%
54%
100%
644
Share capital
At date of
consolidation
3,000
At date of
acquisition
3,000
Retained profits
4,750
2,000
Net assets
7,750
5,000
Postacquisition
2,750
At date of
acquisition
300
Postacquisition
800
Retained profits
1,600
800
Net assets
1,900
1,100
W3: Goodwill
Rs. 000
On acquisition of S
Cost of investment
5,000
1,000
6,000
(5,000)
1,000
On acquisition of T
Direct holding
Cost of direct holding
1,000
500
1,500
Indirect holding
Cost of investment (80% u 1,750)
1,400
2,900
594
3,494
(1,100)
2,394
Total goodwill
3,394
645
Rs. 000
1,000
550
1,550
NCI in T
NCIs share of net assets of at the date of acquisition
(54% u 1,100(W2b))
NCIs share of the post-acquisition retained profits of S
(54% of 800 (W2b))
NCIs share of net assets at the date of consolidation
Less NCI in S share of cost of investment in T (20% u 1,750)
594
432
1,026
(350)
676
Total NCI
2,226
Rs. 000
5,900
500
6,400
2,200
368
8,968
646
OTHER ISSUES
Section overview
647
Other assets
Investment in S
Investment in T
Share capital
Retained profits
Liabilities
S Ltd
Rs. 000
110
T Ltd
Rs. 000
100
400
80
190
100
200
100
100
400
100
60
30
190
50
30
20
100
648
15
82
390
487
200
116.5
316.5
40.5
357
130
487
At date of
acquisition
Retained profits
30
25
Net assets
80
75
Share capital
Postacquisition
50
In Ss books
Dr
Cost of investment
Cr
2
Investment in
S
80
Retained
profits
82
62
At date of
consolidation
100
At date of
acquisition
100
Postacquisition
Retained profits
62
40
22
Net assets
80
140
Per question
Share of post-acquisition profits
60
Share capital
Goodwill on
n acquisition of S
Rs.
Cost of investment
120
35
155
(140)
15
649
Rs.
35
5.5
40.5
Rs.
100
16.5
116.5
650
If the sub-subsidiary has paid a dividend and the main subsidiary has
accounted for its share through the profit and loss account this will be part
of the subsidiarys profit before tax.
It must be eliminated (as a consolidation adjustment) during the noncontrolling interest calculation.
Operating profit
Dividend receivable from T
Taxation
S
600
120*
T
500
CP&L
2,300
2,300
(750)
1,550
1,200
(400)
720
(250)
500
(100)
800
470
400
PAT
1,272
278
1,550
70
In T (52% u 400)
208
278
651
48%
52%
100%
652
Solution (continued)
At date of
acquisition
Retained profits
2,750
2,300
Net assets
5,750
5,300
At date of
consolidation
300
At date of
acquisition
300
Postacquisition
700
650
50
1,000
950
Share capital
Postacquisition
3,000
450
Share capital
Retained profits
Net assets
W2: Goodwill
Rs.
On acquisition of S
Cost of investment
5,000
1,060
6,060
(5,300)
760
On acquisition of T
Cost of investment (80% u 750)
600
494
1,094
(950)
144
Total goodwill
904
653
Solution (continued)
Rs.
1,060
90
1,150
NCI in T
NCIs share of net assets at the date of acquisition
(52% u 950 (W1b))
NCIs share of the post-acquisition retained profits of S
(52% of 50 (W1b))
NCIs share of net assets at the date of consolidation
Less NCI in S share of cost of investment in T (20% u 750)
494
26
520
(150)
370
Total NCI
1,520
Rs.
4,900
360
24
5,284
654
Solution
48%
52%
100%
655
Solution (continued)
Share capital
At date of
consolidation
2,500
At date of
acquisition
Postacquisition
2,500
Retained profits
1,100
400
Net assets
3,600
2,900
700
Share capital
At date of
consolidation
2,000
At date of
acquisition
2,000
Postacquisition
680
Retained profits
1,000
320
Net assets
3,000
2,320
W2: Goodwill
Rs. 000
On acquisition of S
Cost of investment
3,300
800
4,100
(2,900)
1,200
On acquisition of T
Cost of investment (80% u 2,200)
Non-controlling interest at acquisition (fair value)
1,760
2,000
3,760
(2,320)
1,440
Total goodwill
2,640
656
Solution (continued)
Rs. 000
800
140
940
NCI in T
Fair value of NCI at the date of acquisition
NCIs share of the post-acquisition retained profits of S
(52% of 680 (W1b))
2,000
2,354
354
(440)
1,914
2,854
Rs. 000
2,000
560
326
2,886
657
658
CHAPTER
24
Disposal of subsidiaries
Contents
1 Full disposals
2 Part disposals
3 Disposal of a subsidiary which does not contain a
business
4 IFRS 5 and disposals
659
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
A9
660
FULL DISPOSALS
Section overview
Introduction
Pattern of ownership
1.1 Introduction
A parent company might dispose of a holding in a subsidiary.
IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements contains rules on accounting for
disposals of a subsidiary.
Accounting for a disposal is an issue that impacts the statement of profit or loss.
There are two major tasks in constructing a statement of profit or loss for a period
during which there has been a disposal of a subsidiary:
When control is lost, the statement of profit or loss must show the profit or
loss on disposal of the subsidiary.
661
An interest in an associate must also be equity accounted from the date that
significant influence is achieved to the date that it is lost.
Thus, the figures from the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive
income that relate to the period up to the date of disposal must be identified. In
practice, this would normally be achieved by constructing a set of accounts up to
the date of disposal. In exam questions we tend to use time apportionment.
There is another reason for consolidating up to the date of disposal. The
calculation of the profit on disposal involves comparing the sale proceeds to what
leaves the statement of financial positon as at the date of disposal. Therefore, the
results of the subsidiary must be consolidated up to the date of disposal in order
to establish the correct net assets figure.
662
Rs.
Proceeds
X
X
Derecognise:
Net assets of subsidiary
Non-controlling interest
(X)
(X)
Unimpaired goodwill
(X)
197.0
124.0
(10.3)
113.7
18.0
(131.7)
663
65.3
the goodwill arising on acquisition, which in turn needs the net assets of the
subsidiary at the date of acquisition; and
the net assets of the subsidiary at the date of disposal, which in turn needs
a calculation of the equity reserves at the date of disposal.
Example:
At 1 January Year 9, H Ltd held 80% of the equity of S Ltd. The carrying value of
the net assets of S Ltd at this date was Rs.570 million.
There was also goodwill of Rs.20 million net of accumulated impairments
relating to the investment in S Ltd: all this goodwill is attributable to the equity
owners of H Ltd.
On 1 April Year 9, H Ltd sold its entire shareholding in S Ltd for Rs.575 million in
cash.
H Ltd has a financial year ending 31 December. It was subsequently established
that the profit after tax of S Ltd for the year to 31 December Year 9 was Rs.120
million.
S Ltd did not make any dividend payment during the year before the disposal of
the shares.
How should the disposal of the shares be accounted for? (Ignore deferred
taxation).
Answer
In the three months of the year to the date of disposal of the shares in S Ltd, the
after-tax profit of S Ltd was Rs.30 million (Rs.120 million u 3/12).
The carrying value of the net assets of S Ltd at the date that control was lost is
therefore Rs.600 million (Rs.570 million + Rs.30 million).
The gain on disposal of the shares is as follows:
Rs. million
Consideration received from sale of shares
575
620
(120)
(500)
Total gain
75
664
Practice question
P bought 80% of the issued ordinary shares of S twenty five years ago at a
cost of Rs. 330,000 when the net assets of S amounted to Rs. 280,000.
No goodwill is attributed to the non-controlling interests. Goodwill arising on
the acquisition has suffered an impairment of 80% of its original value.
On the final day of the current accounting period P sold its entire
shareholding in S for proceeds of Rs.460,000. At this date the net assets of
S amounted to Rs. 400,000.
Required
What is the profit or loss on disposal reported in consolidated profit or loss
for the current period?
Net assets summary as at the date of disposal and the date of acquisition
665
Example: Facts
Example: Disposal of subsidiary
The following financial statements are to the year-end 31 December 20X4
H
Rs.000
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
8,800
Expenses
(10,000)
(5,000)
Operating profit
Tax
12,950
(5,400
3,800
(2,150)
7,550
1,650
Rs.000
Rs.000
3,760
1,850
7,550
1,650
11,310
3,500
H Ltd bought 90% of S Ltd 4 years ago for Rs. 3,750,000 when the
retained earnings of S ltd were Rs. 500,000.
S Ltd has share capital of Rs. 3,000,000.
b.
H Ltd sold its entire holding in S Ltd on 30 September 20X4 for Rs.
9,500,000.
S Ltd does not qualify to be treated as a discontinued operation
under IFRS5.
c.
Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended
31 December 20X4.
666
S (9/12)
Group
Rs.000
Rs.000
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
6,600
29,550
Expenses
(10,000)
(3,750)
(13,750)
12,950
2,850
15,800
(5,400)
(1,612)
(7,012)
7,550
1,238
Operating profit
Profit on disposal (W)
Profit before tax
Tax
Profit after tax
Rs.000
124
667
At date of
acquisition
Rs.000
Share capital
3,000
3,000
3,088
500
Net assets
6,088
3,500
Rs.000
1,850
1,238
3,088
Rs.000
W3: Goodwill
Cost of investment
Non-controlling interest at acquisition
(10% u 3,500,000 (W1))
3,750
350
4,100
(3,500)
600
9,500
Derecognise:
Net assets at date of disposal (W1)
6,088
(609)
(5,479)
Goodwill (W3)
(600)
3,421
668
S (9/12)
Group
Rs.000
Rs.000
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
6,600
29,550
Expenses
(10,000)
(3,750)
(13,750)
12,950
2,850
15,800
3,421
Operating profit
Profit on disposal (W)
Profit before tax
19,221
Tax
(5,400)
(1,612)
(7,012)
7,550
1,238
12,209
Rs.000
12,085
124
12,209
669
PART DISPOSALS
Section overview
When control is lost, the statement of profit or loss must show the profit or
loss on disposal of the subsidiary.
Rs.
Proceeds
X
X
Derecognise:
Net assets of subsidiary
Non-controlling interest
(X)
(X)
Unimpaired goodwill
(X)
X
670
Rs. m
100.0
70.0
170.0
Derecognised:
Net assets de-recognised
NCI (10% u 124 million)
124.0
(12.4)
Goodwill derecognised
111.6
18.0
(129.6)
40.4
Practice question
Paprika, the holding company of a large group, had bought 90% of the
issued capital Saffron several years ago.
Both companies prepare accounts to 31 December each year.
On 31 October Year 5 Paprika sold 50% of its shareholding in Saffron for
Rs. 540,000.
At this date, the carrying value of the net assets of Saffron was Rs. 800,000
and the carrying value of the goodwill relating to the acquisition of Saffron
(all attributable to the parent company) was Rs. 100,000.
The fair value of the remaining investment in S is estimated at Rs.500,000.
What gain or loss should be recognised on the disposal of the shares in
Saffron?
671
The same step by step approach shown earlier can be used to prepare answers
to questions requiring a consolidated statement of profit or loss when there is a
part disposal of a subsidiary during the year and that part disposal results in a
loss of control.
Work through the following example carefully.
Example: Facts
Example: Part disposal (loss of control but leaving significant influence)
The following financial statements are to the year-end 31 December 20X4
H
Rs.000
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
8,800
Expenses
(10,000)
(5,000)
Operating profit
Tax
12,950
(5,400)
3,800
(2,150)
7,550
1,650
Rs.000
Rs.000
3,760
1,850
7,550
1,650
11,310
3,500
H Ltd bought 90% of S Ltd 4 years ago for Rs. 3,750,000 when the
retained earnings of S ltd were Rs. 500,000.
S Ltd has share capital of Rs. 3,000,000.
b.
c.
d.
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended
31 December 20X4.
672
S (9/12)
Group
Rs.000
Rs.000
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
6,600
29,550
Expenses
(10,000)
(3,750)
(13,750)
12,950
2,850
15,800
Operating profit
Share of profits of associate
(40% u 3/12 u 1,650)
165
(5,400)
(1,612)
7,550
1,238
(7,012)
Rs.000
124
673
At date of
acquisition
Rs.000
Share capital
3,000
3,000
3,088
500
Net assets
6,088
3,500
Rs.000
1,850
1,238
3,088
Rs.000
W3: Goodwill
Cost of investment
3,750
350
4,100
(3,500)
600
5,000
3,500
8,500
Derecognise:
Net assets at date of disposal (W1)
6,088
(609)
(5,479)
Goodwill (W3)
(600)
2,421
674
S (9/12)
Group
Rs.000
Rs.000
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
6,600
29,550
Expenses
(10,000)
(3,750)
(13,750)
12,950
2,850
15,800
Operating profit
Share of profits of associate
(40% u 3/12 u 1,650)
Profit on disposal (W)
165
2,421
18,386
Tax
(5,400)
(1,612)
(7,012)
7,550
1,238
11,374
Rs.000
11,250
124
11,374
675
Rs.000
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
8,800
Expenses
(10,000)
(5,000)
Operating profit
Tax
12,950
(5,400
3,800
(2,150)
7,550
1,650
Rs.000
Rs.000
3,760
1,850
7,550
1,650
11,310
3,500
H Ltd bought 90% of S Ltd 4 years ago for Rs. 3,750,000 when the
retained earnings of S ltd were Rs. 500,000.
S Ltd has share capital of Rs. 3,000,000.
b.
Required
Prepare the consolidated statement of profit or loss for the year ended
31 December 20X4 and calculate the equity adjustment necessary to
reflect the change in ownership.
676
Step 1: Reflect the pattern of ownership and complete the statement of profit and
loss
This is straightforward as the parent has held a subsidiary for the whole year.
The only complication is that the results have to be time apportioned so that the
relevant NCI can be measured.
Profit on disposal is NOT recognised where there is no loss of control.
Answer
Group
Rs.000
Rs.000
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
8,800
31,750
Expenses
(10,000)
(5,000)
(15,000)
12,950
(5,400)
3,800
(2,150)
16,750
(7,550)
7,550
1,650
9,200
Rs.000
8,993
Non-controlling interest
(10% u 1,650 u 9/12)
124
83
207
9,200
677
At date of
acquisition
Rs.000
Share capital
3,000
3,000
3,088
500
Net assets
6,088
3,500
Rs.000
1,850
1,238
3,088
Rs.000
W3: Goodwill
Cost of investment
3,750
350
4,100
(3,500)
600
1,000
(609)
391
1,000
Non-controlling interest
609
Retained earnings
391
678
Background
New rules
3.1 Background
This section explains an amendment to IFRS 10 and IAS 28. The amendment
must be applied for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016. Earlier
application is permitted but must be disclosed.
The amendment concerns a situation where a parent loses control of a subsidiary
that does not contain a business (as defined in IFRS 3) by selling an interest to
an associate (or joint venture) accounted for using the equity method.
Such a transaction is the same as selling an asset to the associate (or joint
venture).
Usually, if a parent loses control of a subsidiary, the parent must:
derecognise the assets and liabilities of the former subsidiary from the
consolidated statement of financial position.
recognise any investment retained in the former subsidiary at its fair value
when control is lost; and
recognise the gain or loss associated with the loss of control in the
statement of profit or loss.
In the case of a part disposal, the parent must measure any residual investment
at its fair value with any gain or loss being recognised in the statement of profit or
loss.
679
The residual investment might be an associate (or joint venture) accounted for
using the equity method. In that case the remeasurement gain or loss is
recognised in profit or loss only to the extent of the unrelated investors interests
in the new associate or joint venture.
The remaining part of that gain is eliminated against the carrying amount of the
investment retained in the former subsidiary.
Example: Loss of control of a subsidiary (that does not contain a business) by
selling it to an associate
H Ltd owns 100% of S Ltd (a company which does not contain a business).
H Ltd owns 20% of A Ltd.
H Ltd sold 70% of S Ltd to A Ltd for Rs.210 million.
The fair value of the identifiable net assets in S Ltd at the date of the sale was
Rs.100 million.
The fair value of the residual investment at the date of disposal was Rs.90
million.
The gain on disposal recognised in profit or loss should be calculated as follows:
Rs. m
Consideration received for shares in S Ltd
Fair value of the residual interest
210.0
90.0
300.0
(100.0)
Gain on disposal
200.0
H Ltd recognises the gain to the extent of the unrelated investors interests.
H Ltd s interests and those of unrelated investors after the disposal are as
follows:
Interests in A Ltd:
H Ltd
Unrelated investors
20%
80%
Total
100%
Interests in S Ltd:
H Ltd
Direct interest
Indirect interest (20% of 70%)
30%
14%
44%
56%
Total
100%
680
Sale
Revaluation
Rs. m
Rs. m
Rs. m
Consideration received
Fair value of the residual interest
210.0
90.0
210.0
90.0
300.0
(100.0)
(70.0)
(30.0)
Gain on disposal
200.0
140.0
60.0
Gain on disposal
Interests in A Ltd:
H Ltd (20%)
Revaluation
Rs. m
60.0
28.0
112.0
Interests in S Ltd:
H Ltd (44%)
Unrelated investors (56%)
26.0
34.0
The double entry to account for the disposal may be summarised as:
Dr (R
Rs.
m)
210.0
Cash
Net assets
100.0
64.0
28.0
146.0
274.0
Cr (R
Rs.
m)
681
274.0
2.
3.
a single amount on the face of the statement of profit or loss comprising the
total of:
x
682
S (9/12)
Rs.000
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
6,600
29,550
Expenses
(10,000)
(3,750)
(13,750)
12,950
2,850
15,800
3,421
Operating profit
Profit on disposal (W)
Profit before tax
Group
19,221
Tax
(5,400)
(1,612)
(7,012)
7,550
1,238
12,209
Rs.000
12,085
124
12,209
683
Rs.000
Revenue
22,950
Expenses
(10,000)
12,950
(5,400)
7,550
4,659
12,209
Rs.000
12,085
124
12,209
684
Proceeds received
Rs.
460,000
400,000
(80,000)
320,000
21,200
341,200
118,800
Solution
Rs.
540,000
500,000
1,040,000
800,000
(80,000)
720,000
100,000
(820,000)
220,000
685
686
CHAPTER
25
687
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
A6
688
Introduction to IAS 27
Disclosure
at cost; or
A company must apply the same accounting for each category of investments.
A recent amendment issued in August 2014 extends this choice to allow an entity
to use the equity method in addition to the other two methods. The amendment
applies for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016. However, earlier
application is permitted but if used it must be disclosed.
Investments accounted for at cost are subject to the rules in IFRS 5 when they
are classified as held for sale.
689
1.3 Disclosure
All applicable IFRSs apply when providing disclosures in separate financial
statements as well as the following requirements.
When a parent prepares separate financial statements, it must disclose:
the fact that the financial statements are separate financial statements;
the fact that the financial statements are separate financial statements;
690
Introduction to IFRS 12
Significant judgements and assumptions
Interests in subsidiaries
Structured entities
the nature of, and risks associated with, its interests in other entities; and
subsidiaries;
subsidiaries;
associates;
691
the type of joint arrangement (i.e. joint operation or joint venture) when the
arrangement has been structured through a separate vehicle.
To comply with the above a company must disclose, for example, significant
judgements and assumptions made in determining that:
it does not control another entity even though it holds more than half of the
voting rights of the other entity;
it controls another entity even though it holds less than half of the voting
rights of the other entity;
it does not have significant influence even though it holds 20% or more of
the voting rights of another entity;
it has significant influence even though it holds less than 20% of the voting
rights of another entity.
to understand:
x
to evaluate:
x
the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in
consolidated structured entities;
the date of the end of the reporting period of the financial statements of that
subsidiary; and
Non-controlling interests
A company must disclose for each of its subsidiaries that have non-controlling
interests that are material to the reporting entity:
692
any significant restrictions on its ability to access or use the assets and
settle the liabilities of the group, such as:
x
the nature, extent and financial effects of its interests in joint arrangements
and associates, including the nature and effects of its contractual
relationship with the other investors with joint control of, or significant
influence over, joint arrangements and associates; and
the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its interests in joint
ventures and associates.
693
for each material joint venture and associate that is material to the reporting
entity:
x
the nature and extent of any significant restrictions on the ability of joint
ventures or associates to transfer funds to the entity in the form of cash
dividends, or to repay loans or advances made by the entity.
when the financial statements used in applying the equity method are as of
a date or for a period that is different from that of the entity:
the date of the end of the reporting period of the financial statements
of that joint venture or associate; and
commitments that it has relating to its joint ventures separately from the
amount of other commitments
694
to evaluate the nature of, and changes in, the risks associated with its
interests in unconsolidated structured entities.
695
696
CHAPTER
26
Foreign currency
Contents
1 IAS 21 The effects of changes in foreign exchange
rates
2 The individual entity: accounting rules
3 The foreign operation: accounting rules
697
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
698
The rules on accounting for foreign currency items are concerned with translating
or converting items from one currency into another currency, at an appropriate
rate of exchange between the currencies. The rules are mostly contained in IAS
21 The effects of changes in foreign exchange rates. The rules in IAS 21 can be
divided into two areas:
One area that IAS 21 does not deal with is the translation of any transactions and
balances that fall within the scope of IAS 39/IFRS 9 on financial instruments. For
699
How to account for the gains or losses that arise when exchange rates
change?
700
The currency in which funds are generated by issuing debt and equity
The functional currency is not necessarily the currency of the country in which the
entity operates or is based, as the next example shows.
Example: Presentation and functional currencies
P is a UK-registered mining company whose shares are traded on the London
Stock Exchange. Its operating activities take place in the gold and diamond
mines of South Africa.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Answer
(a)
(b)
The functional currency is likely to be South African rand, even though the
company is based in the UK. This is because its operating activities take
place in South Africa and so the company will be economically dependent
on the rand if the salaries of most of its employees, and most operating
expenses and sales are in rand.
(c)
701
The spot rate is the euro/dollar exchange rate on 16 November, when the
transaction occurred.
Other definitions
IAS 21 also includes some other terms and definitions.
Definitions
Foreign operation: This is a subsidiary, associate, joint venture or branch whose
activities are conducted in a country or currency different from the functional
currency of the reporting entity.
Net investment in a foreign operation: The amount of the reporting entity's
interest in the net assets of a foreign operation.
Exchange difference: A difference resulting from translating the same assets,
liabilities, income or expenses from one currency into another currency at
different exchange rates.
Monetary items: Units of currency held, or assets and liabilities to be received or
paid (in cash), in a fixed number of currency units. Examples of monetary items
include cash itself, loans, trade payables, trade receivables and interest payable.
Non-monetary items are not defined by IAS 21, but they are items that are not
monetary items. They include tangible non-current assets, investments in other
companies, investment properties and deferred taxation (which is a notional
amount of tax rather than an actual amount of tax payable.)
702
Introduction
Reporting at the end of each reporting period and gain or loss arising on
translation
2.1 Introduction
An individual company may have transactions that are denominated in a foreign
currency. These must be translated into the companys functional currency for
the purpose of recording the transactions in its ledger accounts and preparing its
financial statements.
These transactions may have to be translated on several occasions. When a
transaction or asset or liability is translated on more than one occasion, it is:
when the transaction is settled (which may be either before, or after the end
of the financial year).
buys or sells goods or services that will be paid for in a foreign currency;
703
Purchases
Payables (Rs. 75 u A$10,000)
Credit
Rs. 750,000
704
2.3 Reporting at the end of each reporting period and gain or loss arising on
translation
Transactions in a foreign currency are recognised initially at the spot rate on the
date of the transaction.
Balances resulting from such transactions may still exist in the statement of
financial position at the end of the financial period.
Exchange rates change over time and the exchange rate at the end of the
reporting period will not be the same as the spot rate on the date of the
transaction.
Retranslation of items at a later date will lead to gains or losses if the rates have
moved.
The gain or loss is the difference between the original and re-translated value of
the item.
There is an exchange gain when an asset increases in value on retranslation, or when a liability falls in value.
The rules in IAS 21 for reporting assets and liabilities at the end of a subsequent
reporting period make a distinction between:
The rules are as follows, for entities preparing their individual financial
statements:
Asset or liability
Accounting treatment
Treatment of exchange
difference
Monetary items
Re-translate at the
closing rate.
Recognised in P&L
Non-monetary items
carried at cost
No re-translation. The
transaction is left at the
original spot rate.
Not applicable
Non-monetary items
carried at fair value
Re-translate at the
exchange rate ruling at
the date of the fair value
adjustment.
705
Purchases
Payables (Rs. 75 u A$10,000)
Credit
Rs. 750,000
Credit
Rs. 30,000
Rs. 30,000
750,000
30,000
780,000
In the above example the Pakistani company had purchased inventory. Even if
this were still held at the year-end it would not be retranslated as it is a nonmonetary asset.
Sometimes there might be a movement on the carrying amount of a balance
denominated in a foreign currency during a period. The exchange difference
could be calculated by applying the above approach. However, this can be time
consuming where there is a lot of movements. An easier approach is to find the
exchange difference as a balancing figure.
706
Rs.
Rs.
9,000,000
8,550,000
Exchange loss
b On re-translating September amount:
$10,000 at average rate of 99
$10,000 at closing rate of 95
450,000
990,000
950,000
Exchange loss
40,000
Exchange loss
490,000
There is an exchange loss because the company has a dollar asset but the dollar
has weakened against the rupee over the period.
This approach might be cumbersome if there are more than a few movements on
an account. The following approach simply records all items at the appropriate
rates and identifies the exchange difference as a balancing figure.
$
Rate
Rs.
90,000
100
9,000,000
10,000
99
990,000
Exchange loss
(490,000)
100,000
707
95
9,500,000
Rate
Rs.
90,000
100
9,000,000
Interest
10,000
95
950,000
Exchange gain
(450,000)
100,000
95
9,500,000
Rate
Rs.
90,000
100
9,000,000
Interest
10,000
99
990,000
Exchange gain
(490,000)
100,000
95
9,500,000
There is an exchange gain because the company has a dollar liability but the
dollar has weakened against the rupee over the period.
The balancing figure approach can be used in any situation where there are
movements on an amount denominated in a foreign currency.
For example, when consolidating foreign subsidiaries the parent consolidated the
subsidiarys net assets at the start of the period (in last years consolidated
statement of financial position) and its profit for the period (in this years
consolidated statement of profit or loss. These two figures will sum to the
subsidiarys net assets at the end of the period in the foreign currency but not
when translated into rupees. The difference is an exchange gain or loss.
This will be covered in a later section.
708
Debit
27,500,000
Credit
27,500,000
Credit
7,300,000
7,300,000
Being the recognition of revaluation gain and exchange gain on
retranslation of carrying amount of a building denominated a foreign
currency.
709
BD
Rate
Rs.
100,000
275
27,500,000
20,000
290
5,800,000
Exchange gain
1,500,000
120,000
290
34,800,000
If the building was an investment property, revalued following the rules in IAS 40
the credit of Rs.7,300,000 would be to the statement of profit or loss.
Practice question
710
Receivables
Revenue
Credit
2,016,000
On 19 November
Debit
2,160,000
Cash
Receivables
2,016,000
Credit
711
144,000
Consolidation example
Description
Translate
Consolidate
Given the time pressure in the exam you might consider setting up a proforma
answer to allow you to consolidate translated figures as you go along. In other
words try to do stage 2 and part of stage 3 together. This will allow you to build
quickly the easier part of the answer leaving time to concentrate on the trickier
parts.
712
(2)
(3)
The assets and liabilities of the foreign operation are translated at the
closing rate for inclusion in the consolidated statement of financial
position.
Income and expenses are translated at the rates ruling at the date of
the transaction (spot rates) for inclusion in the consolidated
statement of profit or loss.
Exchange differences
x
Income and expense items are translated at the exchange rates ruling
during the period (or an average rate as an approximation) but assets and
liabilities are translated at closing rates. The profit is therefore calculated at
the actual (average) exchange rates, but the accumulated profit in the
713
The net assets of the subsidiary were translated at last years closing rate
at the end of the previous financial year. These net assets have now been
retranslated and included in this years statement of financial position at this
years closing rate.
IAS 21 states that these differences on translation are not recognised in profit or
loss because changes in the exchange rates for these items have little or no
effect on cash flows from operations. It would therefore be misleading to include
them in profit or loss.
Example: Exchange difference arising on retranslation of a foreign subsidiary
A Pakistani parent company has a Singapore subsidiary, which is 80% owned.
The following information is available about the subsidiary for the year to 31
December:
S$
Opening net assets, 1 January
Retained profit for the year
16,000
6,000
22,000
Rs.75/$
Rs.80/$
Rs.85/$
Rate
Rs.
16,000
75
1,200,000
6,000
80
480,000
Exchange gain
190,000
22,000
85
1,870,000
Note that the Rs. 190,000 would be reported as a gain in other comprehensive
income.
The amount attributable to the parent of Rs. 152,000 (80% of Rs. 190,000)
would then be recognised in a currency translation reserve.
The amount attributable to the non-controlling interest is Rs. 38,000 (20% of Rs.
190,000). This would be recognised in the non-controlling interest balance in the
statement of financial position.
714
Practice question
$20,000
$10,000
$30,000
Dividends paid
Relevant Rs./$ exchange rates are as follows:
1 January Year 5
Average for the year
31 December Year 5
$0
Rs.100/$
Rs.106/$
Rs.110/$
Required
Calculate the total gain or loss on translation for the year.
Analyse it into:
a. the gain or loss on re-translating profit in the year; and
b. the gain or loss on re-translating the opening net assets.
Goodwill arising on the purchase of the foreign subsidiary (and also any fair
value adjustments to the value of assets of the subsidiary) should be stated
in the functional currency of the foreign subsidiary.
715
The goodwill and fair value adjustments will therefore be translated each
year at the closing exchange rate.
A gain or loss on translation will therefore arise (as described above for other
assets and liabilities).
The effect of this rule is that goodwill and the acquisition of a foreign operation is
re-stated over time because it is re-translated every year at the new closing
exchange rate.
The rationale behind this accounting rule is that the amount paid for the
investment in the subsidiary has been based on the expected future earnings
stream. The goodwill relates to a business which operates in the economic
environment of another country and should therefore be expressed in the
functional currency of the foreign subsidiary.
Example: Goodwill arising on the acquisition of a foreign subsidiary and its
subsequent retranslation
A Pakistani parent company bought 80% of the shares of a Singapore company
on 1 January at a cost of Rs. 1,125,000.
The new subsidiary had retained earnings of S$11,000 at the date of acquisition.
It had share capital of S$5,000.
There were no fair value adjustments at the date of acquisition.
The parent recognises a proportionate share of non-controlling interest.
Relevant Rs./S$ exchange rates are as follows:
1 January
Rs.75/$
31 December
Rs.85/$
Goodwill is first calculated in the foreign currency as at the date of acquisition
using the rates appropriate to that date.
Goodwill arising on acquisition
Cost of investment
Rate
Rs.
15,000
75
1,125,000
(12,800)
75
(960,000)
Goodwill
2,200
75
165,000
Retranslation at 31 December
2,200
85
187,000
Exchange gain
22,000
716
Practice question
S
S$
1,125,000
800,000
1,500,000
10,000
14,000
3,425,000
24,000
Share capital
Retained earnings
1,000,000
2,025,000
5,000
17,000
Current liabilities
3,025,000
400,000
22,000
2,000
3,425,000
24,000
1,425,000
11,000
600,000
6,000
2,025,000
17,000
717
Rs. 75/S$
Rs. 80/S$
Rs. 85/S$
5,000
17,000
22,000
2,000
24,000
Current liabilities
Balance
85
85
S
Rs.
850,000
1,190,000
2,040,000
1,870,000
170,000
2,040,000
The main purpose of this working is to identify values for the assets and liabilities
of the subsidiary so that they can be consolidated.
There is no need to translate the share capital and reserves at the closing rate.
These will be considered later when we look at the net assets summary.
In the above answer we have identified the sum of the share capital and reserves
as a balancing figure. This figure is based on the net assets at the reporting date
translated at the closing rate. Therefore it must include the exchange differences.
We will need to identify these separately.
Step 3: Carry out the consolidation. Some of the numbers are very
straightforward get the easy marks first by setting up a proforma answer and
filling in the blanks as far as you can. Only then go on to look at the more difficult
numbers (goodwill, retained earnings, exchange differences etc.)
Emile Woolf International
718
800,000
1,500,000
Share capital
Retained earnings
1,000,000
2,025,000
Translation reserve
NCI
Current liabilities
400,000
S (W1)
Rs.
S
Rs.
850,000
1,190,000
1,650,000
2,690,000
1,000,000
170,000
570,000
Net assets at
the date of
acquisition
S$.
5,000
17,000
S$.
5,000
11,000
22,000
16,000
85
75
1,870,000
1,200,000
Share capital
Retained earnings
Postacquisition
670,000
719
Rs.
374,000
$
15,000
Rate
75
Rs.
1,125,000
12,800
75
960,000
Goodwill
2,200
75
165,000
Retranslation at 31 December
2,200
85
187,000
Exchange gain
22,000
translation reserve.
Rate
Rs.
16,000
75
1,200,000
6,000
80
480,000
Exchange gain
190,000
22,000
85
1,870,000
720
Attributable to
parent
Attributable to
NCI
Rs.
Rs.
Rs.
22,000
22,000
nil
On net assets of S
190,000
152,000
38,000
212,000
174,000
38,000
On goodwill
Non-controlling
interest
Rs.
1,425,000
Rs.
240,000
984,000
96,000
All of H
600,000
Balance at start
Translation
reserve
Rs.
Share of S:
80% of (6,000 u Rs. 80)
384,000
96,000
984,000
Exchange difference
Balance at end
2,409,000
96000
38,000
174,000
374,000
174,000
721
800,000
1,500,000
S (W1)
Rs.
850,000
1,190,000
S
Rs.
187,000
1,650,000
2,690,000
4,527,000
Share capital
Retained earnings
Translation reserve
NCI
Current liabilities
1,000,000
2,025,000
400,000
1,000,000
2,409,000
174,000
374,000
170,000
570,000
4,527,000
An aside
Note that in the above the retained earnings (Rs. 2,409,000) and the translation
reserve (Rs.174,000) sum to Rs. 2,583,000.
This can be proved by using the post-acquisition balance found in the net asset
working.
Example: Step 3 (continued) Proof of consolidated reserves total
Consolidated reserves (total)
All of H
Share of S (post acquisition) = 80% u Rs.670,000 (W2)
Exchange difference on retranslation of goodwill
Rs.
2,025,000
536,000
22,000
2,583,000
722
Rs. 80/S$
Rs.
2,200,000
(1,600,000)
S$
14,000
(8,000)
600,000
6,000
6,000
80
480,000
Consolidation
Example: Step 3
Consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income
for the year ending 31 December 2015
Statement of profit or loss
Revenue
Expenses
Profit
H
Rs.
2,200,000
(1,600,000)
S (W1)
Rs.
1,120,000
(640,000)
S
Rs.
3,320,000
(2,240,000)
600,000
480,000
1,080,000
723
212,000
1,292,000
984,000
96,000
1,080,000
174,000
38,000
212,000
724
Example: Disposal
A company held 100% of the equity of a subsidiary S, but sold the entire
investment on 1 June when the carrying value of the net assets S and the
purchased goodwill were Rs.30 million. The consideration received from selling
the shares was Rs.37 million.
The company had previously recognised exchange gains of Rs.2 million in other
comprehensive income on its investment in S.
Required
Show the amount to be recognised in the statement of profit or loss in respect of
this disposal.
Answer
The company should recognise Rs.9 million in profit or loss for the financial
period when the disposal occurs as follows:
Rs.m
m
Consideration received from sale of shares
Carrying value of net assets of S
37.0
30.0
Gain
Exchange gain previously recognised in other comprehensive
income (reclassification adjustment)
7.0
9.0
2.0
725
On initial recognition
The machine and resulting liability are recognised initially at Rs. 24,000,000
(200,000 u Rs.120).
31 December
The liability is a monetary amount and must be retranslated at the closing rate. This
results in an amount of Rs. 22,000,000 (200,000 u Rs.110).
This is achieved by recognising an exchange gain of Rs. 2,000,000.
On 31 December
Debit
Rs. 2,000,000
Payables
Statement of profit or loss
Credit
Rs. 2,000,000
Solutions
a
Exchange difference
$
Rate
Rs.
20,000
100
2,000,000
10,000
106
1,060,000
Exchange gain
240,000
30,000
110
3,300,000
The entire profit for the year is included in accumulated profit at the end of the year,
because no dividends were paid during the year.
b
Rs.
2,000,000
2,200,000
Rs.
200,000
b
1,060,000
1,100,000
40,000
240,000
726
Solutions
$
800,000
300,000
Rate
100
100
Rs.
80,000,000
30,000,000
Goodwill
500,000
100
50,000,000
Retranslation at 31 December
500,000
120
60,000,000
Exchange gain
10,000,000
727
728
CHAPTER
27
729
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
730
the cash flows of the entity during the reporting period, and
A statement of cash flows groups inflows and outflows of cash under three broad
headings:
It also shows whether there was an increase or a decrease in the amount of cash
held by the entity between the beginning and the end of the period.
Illustration: Statement of cash flows
Cash from operating activities
Cash used in (or obtained from) investing activities
Cash paid or received in financing activities.
X/(X)
X/(X)
X/(X)
X/(X)
X/(X)
X/(X)
A statement of cash flows reports the change in the amount of cash and cash
equivalents held by the entity during the financial period.
Cash and cash equivalents
Definition: Cash, cash equivalents and cash flows
Cash comprises cash on hand and demand deposits.
Cash equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily
convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk
of changes in value.
Cash flows are inflows and outflows of cash and cash equivalents.
731
IAS 7 does not define a quantitative threshold for readily convertible. However,
normally investments that may be converted into cash within 90 days are treated
as readily convertible into cash.
1.2 Format
IAS 7 does not include a format that must be followed. However it gives illustrative
examples of formats that meet the requirements in the standard.
This section provides examples of these.
Illustration: Statement of cash flows
Rs.
Net cash flow from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Acquisition of shares (debentures, etc.)
Purchase of property, plant and machinery
Proceeds from sale of non-current assets
Interest received/dividends received
Net cash used in investing activities
Rs.
75,300
(5,000)
(35,000)
6,000
1,500
(32,500)
30,000
10,000
(17,000)
(25,000)
(2,000)
40,800
5,000
45,800
For clarity, what this means is that there are two approaches to arriving at the
figure of Rs. 75,300 in the above example.
IAS 7 allows entities to use either method of presentation. It encourages entities
to use the direct method. However, the indirect method is used more in practice.
The two methods differ only in the way that they present the cash flows for cash
generated from operations. In all other respects, the figures in the statement of
cash flows using the direct method are identical to the figures in a statement
using the indirect method cash flows from investing activities and financing
activities are presented in exactly the same way.
732
The following illustration shows how the net cash flow from operating activities
figure seen in the previous example was arrived at using the indirect method.
Illustration: The indirect method
Statement of ca
ash flows: indirect method
Rs.
Rs.
80,000
Adjustments for:
Depreciation and amortisation charges
20,000
2,300
(6,000)
4,500
100,800
(7,000)
Decrease in inventories
2,000
3,000
98,800
(21,000)
(2,500)
733
75,300
Rs.
348,800
(70,000)
(150,000)
(30,000)
98,800
(21,000)
(2,500)
75,300
The figures in the two statements are identical from Cash generated from
operations down to the end. The only differences are in the presentation of the
cash flows that produced the Cash generated from operations.
IAS 7 allows some variations in the way that cash flows for interest and dividends
are presented in a statement of cash flows, although the following should be
shown separately:
interest received
dividends received
interest paid
dividends paid.
734
Beginning of 2014
End of 2014
22,000
During the year, interest charges in the income statement were Rs. 22,000.
The interest payment for inclusion in the statement of cash flows can be
calculated as follows:
Rs.
Liability at the start of the year
4,000
22,000
26,000
(3,000)
Cash paid
23,000
Taxation
The tax paid is the last figure in the operating cash flow calculation.
Example: Taxation paid
A company had liabilities in its statement of financial position at the beginning and
at the end of 2014, as follows:
Taxation (Rs.)
53,000
Beginning of 2014
End of 2014
61,000
53,000
77,000
130,000
(61,000)
Cash paid
69,000
735
Deferred taxation
A question might include deferred taxation.
A deferred tax balance might be an asset or a liability. Deferred tax liability is
more common (in practice and in questions) so this discussion will be about
liabilities.
A deferred tax liability is an amount that a company expects to pay in the future.
Therefore it has had no cash effect to date.
Any movement on the deferred tax liability will be due to a double entry to tax
expense in the profit or loss section of the statement of comprehensive income.
There are two possible courses of action in dealing with deferred tax. Either:
ignore it entirely and work with numbers that exclude the deferred tax (in
effect this was what happened in the example above where there was no
information about deferred tax); or
53,000
End of 2014
61,000
Deferred
taxation (Rs.)
20,000
30,000
The tax expense for the year in the statement of profit or loss was Rs.
87,000. This was made up of the current tax expense of Rs. 77,000 and
the deferred tax of Rs. 10,000.
The tax payment (cash flows) for inclusion in the statement of cash flows
can be calculated as follows:
Rs.
Liability at the start of the year
(53,000 + 20,000)
73,000
(77,000 + 10,000)
87,000
160,000
(61,000 + 30,000)
(91,000)
69,000
736
inventories; and
Any change in the balance of each line item of working capital from one period to
another will affect a firm's cash flows. For example, if a company's accounts
receivable increase at the end of the year, this means that the firm collected less
money from its customers than it recorded in sales during the same year. This is
a negative event for cash flow and may contribute to the "Net changes in current
assets and current liabilities" on the firm's cash flow statement to be negative. On
the flip side, if accounts payable were also to increase, it means a firm is able to
pay its suppliers more slowly, which is a positive for cash flow.
Assuming that the calculation of the cash flow from operating activities starts with
a profit (rather than a loss) the adjustments are as follows:
Increase in balance from start
to the end of the year
Receivables
Inventory
Payables
Balance
737
Practice question
A company made an operating profit before tax of Rs. 16,000 in the year
just ended.
Depreciation charges were Rs. 15,000.
There was a gain of Rs. 5,000 on disposals of non-current assets and there
were no interest charges. Values of working capital items at the beginning
and end of the year were:
Receivables
Inventory
Trade payables
Rs. 9,000
Rs. 6,000
Rs. 3,000
Rs. 5,000
Rs. 4,000
Rs. 6,500
738
Cash paid for the purchase of investments and cash received from the sale of
investments
2.1 Cash paid for the purchase of property plant and equipment
This is the second part of a statement of cash flows, after cash flows from
operating activities.
The most important items in this part of the statement are cash paid to purchase
non-current assets and cash received from the sale or disposal of non-current
assets but it also includes interest received and dividends received on
investments.
Movement on non-current assets might be summarised as follows:
Illustration: Movement on non-current assets
Rs.
At cost or valuation, at the beginning of the year
(X)
X/(X)
X
739
Rs.
X
(X)
(X)
X/(X)
X
X
(X)
2013
2014
Rs.
Rs.
At cost/re-valued amount
1,400,000
1,900,000
Accumulated depreciation
(350,000)
(375,000)
1,050,000
1,525,000
Carrying value
During the year, some property was revalued upwards by Rs. 200,000.
An item of equipment was disposed of during the year at a profit of Rs.
25,000. This equipment had an original cost of Rs. 260,000 and
accumulated depreciation of Rs. 240,000 at the date of disposal.
Depreciation charged in the year was Rs. 265,000.
Cost
NBV
1,400,000
1,050,000
(260,000)
(20,000)
Depreciation
(265,000)
Revaluation
200,000
200,000
1,340,000
965,000
560,000
560,000
1,900,000
1,525,000
The revaluation recognised in the year can be found by comparing the opening
and closing balances on the revaluation surplus account. There might also be
revaluation double entry recognised as a gain or loss in other comprehensive
income (incremental depreciation). You need to total revaluation recognised in
the year so you may have to add or net both amounts.
740
Rs.
X
(X)
X
X/(X)
2.3 Cash paid for the purchase of investments and cash received from the sale
of investments
A statement of cash flows should include the net cash paid to buy investments in
the period and the cash received from the sale of investment in the period.
It is useful to remember the following relationship:
Illustration: Movement on investments
(X)
X
X/(X)
Rs.
X
741
Cash receipts
Rs.
X
742
Equity shares
Share premium
1 January 2014
Rs.
600,000
800,000
31 December 2014
Rs.
750,000
1,100,000
There was a 1 for 6 bonus issue during the year funded out of retained earnings.
The bonus issue was followed later in the year by a rights issue to raise cash for the
purchase of new plan.
(The information about the bonus issue means that for every 6 shares held at the
start of the year one new share was issued. Therefore, the share capital changed
from Rs. 600,000 to Rs. 700,000. The double entry to achieve this was Dr
Retained earnings and Cr Share capital).
The cash obtained from issuing shares during the year is calculated as follows.
Share capital + Share premium at the end of 2014
Share capital + Share premium at the beginning of 2014
Bonus issue (600,000 u 7/6 )
Cash obtained from issuing new shares in 2014
Rs.
1,850,000
(1,400,000)
(100,000)
350,000
If a bonus issue is funded out of share premium it can be ignored because the
balances on the two accounts are added together so the total would not be
affected.
Remember to add any loans, loan notes or bonds repayable within one year
(current liability) to the loans, loan notes or bonds repayable after more than one
year (non-current liability) to get the total figure for loans, loan notes or bonds.
Illustration: Cash from loans
Rs.
X
Note: The same calculation can be applied to bonds or loan notes that the
company might have issued. Bonds and loan notes are long-term debt.
743
X
X
X
(X)
Practice questions
From the following information, calculate the cash flows from investing
activities for Company X in 2014.
Beginning of
End of
2014
2014
Rs.
Rs.
Share capital (ordinary shares)
400,000
500,000
Share premium
275,000
615,000
Retained earnings
390,000
570,000
1,065,000
1,685,000
600,000
520,000
80,000
55,000
The company made a profit of Rs. 420,000 for the year after taxation.
Required
Calculate for 2014, for inclusion in the statement of cash flows:
(a)
(b)
(c)
744
745
Illustrative format
non-controlling interests;
A loss arising from exchange rate differences (shown in the example that
follows as a foreign exchange loss) must be added back.
746
Illustration: X Plc: Consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended 31
December 20X7
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
440
Adjustments for:
Depreciation and amortisation charges
450
50
(100)
40
Investment income
(25)
Interest expense
25
880
(80)
Increase in inventories
(60)
40
780
(30)
(200)
550
(450)
(220)
30
Interest received
25
45
(570)
500
100
(150)
(80)
(70)
(200)
100
80
150
230
747
Cash
Inventories
Trade receivables
60
870
Trade payables
(70)
Long-term loan
(200)
800
(50)
750
(300)
450
20X6
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
120
110
Short-term investments
210
80
330
190
(40)
330
150
748
X
(X)
X
(X)
X
749
20X7
Rs. 000
1,510
20X6
Rs. 000
1,380
250
470
Required
What figure should appear in the consolidated statement of cash flows for the
year to 31 December 20X7 for the dividends paid to non-controlling interests?
Under what heading will this figure appear in the group statement of cash flows?
Answer
Rs. 000
Non-controlling interest in group net assets at the beginning of
the year
Non-controlling interest in profits after tax for the year
1,380
250
1,630
(120)
1,510
The dividend paid of Rs. 120,000 will be disclosed as a cash flow from financing
activities.
Practice question
Rs. 000
200
Rs. 000
320
1,560
1,380
240
220
Required
What figure will appear in the consolidated statement of cash flows for
the year to 31 December Year 4 for dividend paid to non-controlling
interests?
750
Practice question
Year 5
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
20
25
270
300
600
630
Required
What figure will appear in the consolidated statement of cash flows for
the year to 31 December Year 5 in respect of non-controlling interests?
Practice question
751
financial position. When the figures for non-controlling interest in the opening and
closing statements of financial position are used to calculate dividend payments
to non-controlling interests, we must therefore remove the effect of exchange rate
differences during the year.
The calculation of the dividends paid to the non-controlling interests should then
be calculated as follows:
Illustration: Dividends paid to NCI
Rs.
Non-controlling interest in group net assets at the beginning of
the year
Non-controlling interest in profits after tax for the year
Add non-controlling interest share of foreign exchange gain (or
subtract NCI share of a loss)
Dividends paid to non-controlling interests (as a balancing
figure)
Non-controlling interest in group net assets at the end of the
year
X
X
X/(X)
X
X
X
5.4 Associates (or JVs) and the group statement of cash flows
When a group has an interest in an associate entity, the consolidated statement
of cash flows must show the cash flows that occur between the associate (or JV)
and the group. The consolidated statement of cash flows shows the effect on the
groups cash position of transactions between the group and its associate (or JV).
The cash held by an associate (or JV) is not included in the groups cash figure in
the consolidated statement of financial position. This is because the equity
method of accounting does not add the associates (or JVs) cash to the cash of
the holding company and subsidiaries. As far as cash flows are concerned, the
associate (or JV) is outside the group. (The same principles apply to other
investments accounted for under the equity method, such as joint ventures
accounted for by the equity method).
Share of profit (or loss) of an associate (or JV)
In the consolidated statement of profit or loss, the group profit includes the
groups share of the profits of associates (or JVs). These profits are not a cash
flow item. When the indirect method is used to present the cash flows from
operating activities, an adjustment is therefore needed to get from profit to cash
flow.
The groups share of the profit of an associate (or JV) must be deducted
from profit.
The groups share of the loss of an associate (or JV) must be added to
profit.
752
Investing activities
x
cash paid to acquire shares in an associate (or JV) during the year
Financing activities
x
cash paid as a new loan to or from an associate (or JV) during the
year
Note that dividends received from an associate (or JV) are shown as cash flows
from investing activities; whereas dividends paid to non-controlling interests in
subsidiaries are (usually) shown as cash flows from financing activities.
(X)
X
(X)
753
1,468
136
1,604
(648)
956
20X6
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
932
912
Investments in associates
Share of net assets
Required
(a) What figure should appear in the group statement of cash flows for the year
to 31 December 20X7 for the associate?
(b) Under which heading would you expect this figure to appear in the group
statement of cash flows?
Answer
(a)
Rs. 000
Group investment in net assets of associate at the
beginning of the year
912
136
1,048
(116)
932
The cash flow of Rs. 116,000 will be shown as a cash flow from investing
activities in the group statement of cash flows.
754
Practice question
Year 4
Year 3
Rs. 000
Rs. 000
932
912
96
58
Current assets
Dividend receivable from associate
Consolidated statement of profit or loss (extract):
Investments in associated undertakings
Year 4
Rs. 000
1,468
136
1,604
Income taxes:
(648)
956
Required
Calculate the figure that will appear in the consolidated statement of
cash flows for the year to 31 December Year 4 in respect of dividend
received from associates?
755
the group gains control of the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary, which
might include some cash and cash equivalents, and
the group pays for its share of the subsidiary, and the purchase
consideration might consist partly or entirely of cash.
In the group statement of cash flows, a single figure is shown (under the heading
Cash flows from investing activities) for the net effect of the cash flows from
acquiring the subsidiary. This net effect is:
Illustration: Cash paid for a subsidiary
Rs.
X
(X)
X
This net cash payment is the amount shown in the group statement of cash
flows.
Example: Cash paid for a subsidiary
Blue Group acquired 80% of the shares in Green Entity on 5 September 20X6,
when the net assets of Green Entity were Rs. 800,000, including Rs. 25,000 in
cash and cash equivalents. The purchase consideration was Rs. 700,000,
consisting of Rs. 500,000 in new shares of Blue (the holding company) and Rs.
200,000 in cash.
The cash flow shown in the group statement of cash flows for the year to 31
December 20X6 is:
Rs.
200,000
(25,000)
175,000
756
Note that in the above example, even though only 80% of the shares in Green
Entity have been acquired, the full Rs. 25,000 of cash held by the subsidiary is
brought into the group statement of financial position at the acquisition date. The
figure deducted from the cash in the purchase consideration is therefore 100% of
the subsidiarys cash and cash equivalents acquired.
(X)
(X)
Satisfied by:
New shares in holding company
Cash
Purchase consideration
The total purchase consideration equals the fair value of the net assets acquired.
The cash of the subsidiary at the acquisition date (C2) is then deducted from the
cash paid (C1) to arrive at the figure that appears in the statement of cash flows
for the Acquisition net of cash received
757
3
85
139
421
(68)
(100)
480
(96)
Purchased goodwill
384
76
460
Satisfied by:
Issue of shares
Cash paid (C1)
152
308
460
Rs.
In the statement of cash flows itself, the cash payment on the acquisition of the
subsidiary is not Rs. 308,000, because the cash flow is shown as the payment
minus the cash held by the subsidiary at the acquisition date (which is cash
brought into the group by acquiring the subsidiary).
In this example, the cash brought into the group on acquisition, as a part of the
net assets of the subsidiary, is Rs. 3,000.
758
the trade payables in the net assets of the subsidiary acquired, as at the
acquisition date.
Rs. 120,000
Rs. 190,000
During the year, the group acquired a 75% interest in a new subsidiary, Entity S,
which had inventories of Rs. 40,000 at the acquisition date.
Required
What figure should be shown in the group statement of cash flows as the
adjustment for the increase or decrease in inventories?
759
Answer
Rs.
120,000
40,000
160,000
30,000
190,000
Inventories have increased by Rs. 30,000 after allowing for the Rs. 40,000 of
inventories brought into the group when the subsidiary was purchased.
This would usually be shown as a working on the face of the answer as (Rs.
190,000 (120,000 + 40,000))
Purchases of non-current assets
When non-current assets are shown at their carrying amount (net book value)
and a subsidiary has been acquired during the year, purchases of non-current
assets (assumed to be cash payments) are calculated as follows.
Example: Cash paid to buy non-current assets
Rs.
Non-current assets at carrying amount, at the beginning of
the year
240,000
(30,000)
(40,000)
55,000
65,000
760
120,000
290,000
Other items
Similar principles can be applied to all other assets and liabilities to find the cash
effect, for example to calculate loan repayments and repayments of leasing
obligations
Example: Tax paid
The Spot Group had the following items in its opening and closing group
statements of financial position at the beginning and at the end of 20X6:
At 1 January 20X6
Rs. 000
At 31 December 20X6
Rs. 000
250
136
325
165
The Spot Group acquired a 60% holding in a subsidiary, Entity B, on 7 May 20X6.
The total tax liability of Entity B at this date was Rs. 120,000. The total charge for
taxation in the consolidated statement of profit or loss of the Spot Group for the
year to 31 December 20X6 was Rs. 950,000.
Required
What was the cash payment for taxation during the year, for inclusion on the
group statement of cash flows?
Answer
The tax liability in the subsidiary when it was acquired should be deducted from
the closing tax liability for the group (or added to the opening tax liability for the
group) to avoid double counting.
Group tax liability at the beginning of the year
Tax liability acquired in the subsidiary
Group tax charge in the year
Rs. 000
386
120
950
1,456
(966)
490
Note
To calculate the tax payment for the year, you should take the entire tax charge at
the beginning and at the end of the year both current tax and deferred tax.
761
Non-controlling interest
At 1 January 20X6
Rs. 000
350
At 31 December 20X6
Rs. 000
415
The Spot Group acquired a 60% holding in a subsidiary, Entity B, on 7 May 20X6.
The net assets of Entity B at this date were Rs. 800,000 at fair value. The profit
attributable to non-controlling interests in the groups statement of profit or loss
for the year to 31 December 20X6 was Rs. 270,000.
Required
What dividends were paid to the non-controlling interests during the year to 31
December 20X6?
Answer
Again, to avoid double counting we need to:
a.
deduct the non-controlling interest acquired from the value for noncontrolling interest in the closing consolidated statement of financial
position, or
b.
(as shown below) add the non-controlling interest acquired to the noncontrolling interest in the opening consolidated statement of financial
position.
Rs. 000
350
320
270
940
(525)
415
The cash outflow will be shown as a cash flow from financing activities.
762
Goodwill
At 1 January 20X6
Rs. 000
600
At 31 December 20X6
Rs. 000
540
The Spot Group acquired a 60% holding in a subsidiary, Entity B, on 7 May 20X6.
Purchased goodwill arising on the acquisition of Entity B was Rs. 110,000. The
Spot Group uses the indirect method to present its group statement of cash
flows.
Required
What is the impairment to goodwill for the year, and where would it appear in the
group statement of cash flows?
Answer
The impairment of goodwill
indirect method is used to
impairment of assets during
back to the profit figure (in
charges are added back).
When a subsidiary is acquired during the year, the calculation of the impairment
must allow for the purchased goodwill in the newly-acquired subsidiary. An
adjustment is needed to avoid double-counting.
710
(170)
Impairment
Goodwill at the end of the year
Rs. 000
600
110
763
540
(200)
(80)
(320)
400
764
Answer
Cash received from the sale of the shares in the subsidiary is Rs. 550,000.
However, a note to the statement of cash flows should present the details of the
net assets disposed of, the proceeds from the sale, and the profit or loss on
disposal.
The profit or loss is the difference between the value of the net assets disposed of
and the proceeds from the sale. It is a balancing figure, in the same way that the
purchased goodwill is the balancing figure in a similar note to the statement of
cash flows when a subsidiary has been acquired.
In this example, the subsidiary had a bank overdraft when it was disposed of. The
cash in the subsidiary at the date of disposal was therefore a negative amount.
The group no longer has the bank overdraft, which means that its cash flow
position improved by selling off the subsidiary.
In the statement of cash flows itself, the cash proceeds from the disposal of the
subsidiary (net of cash lost) is the cash from the disposal proceeds plus the bank
overdraft that is no longer in the group (Rs. 550,000 + Rs. 320,000 = Rs.
870,000).
Rs. 000
Net assets disposed of:
Tangible non current assets
Inventories
Trade receivables
Trade payables
Taxation
Bank overdraft
500
200
300
(200)
(80)
(320)
400
(80)
Profit on disposal
320
230
Proceeds
Satisfied by:
550
Cash
550
870
765
To avoid double counting of the effects of the working capital in the subsidiary at
the disposal date, we need to deduct from the value in the opening statement of
financial position, or add to the value in the closing statement of financial
position:
the receivables in the net assets of the subsidiary sold as at the date of
disposal;
the inventory in the net assets of the subsidiary sold as at the date of
disposal; and
the trade payables in the net assets of the subsidiary sold as at the date of
disposal.
Example: Disposal
Suppose that the group in the previous example uses the indirect method of
computing the cash flow from operating activities. Inventories were Rs.
1,600,000 in the opening group statement of financial position at the beginning
of the year and Rs. 1,500,000 in the closing group statement of financial
position.
Required
What figure in respect of inventories would be used as an adjustment in
calculating the cash flows from operating activities?
Answer
Rs.
000
Group inventories at the beginning of the year
Inventories disposed of in the subsidiary
1,600
(200)
1,400
100
1,500
766
1
Rs.
Rs.
16,000
15,000
(5,000)
26,000
3,000
(2,000)
2,500
29,500
(4,800)
24,700
Solution
Workings
Proceeds from new issue of shares
Share capital and share premium:
At the end of the year (500,000 + 615,000)
At the beginning of the year (400,000 + 275,000)
Proceeds from new issue of shares during the year
Repayment of loans
Rs.
1,115,000
675,000
440,000
Rs.
Loans repayable:
At the end of the year (520,000 + 55,000)
At the beginning of the year (600,000 + 80,000)
575,000
680,000
105,000
767
Payment of dividends
Rs.
390,000
420,000
810,000
(570,000)
240,000
Rs.
440,000
Repayment of loans
Dividends paid to shareholders
Rs.
(105,000)
(240,000)
95,000
Solution
1,700
240
1,940
(1,760)
180
Solution
620
300
920
655
(265)
768
Solution
3.6
2.0
1.6
1.5
8.7
6.0
(2.7)
Solution
970
136
1,106
(1,028)
78
769
770
CHAPTER
28
Contents
1 P/E ratio and earnings per share
2 Calculating basic EPS
3 Diluted EPS
4 IAS 33: Presentation and disclosure requirements
5 Earnings per share as a performance measure
771
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply application abilities of the
requirements of the international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and
other applicable regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the
presentation of financial statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
772
=
Earnings per share
The P/E ratio can be used by investors to assess whether the shares of a
company appear expensive or cheap. A high P/E ratio usually indicates that the
stock market expects strong performance from the company in the future and
investors are therefore prepared to pay a high multiple of historical earnings to
buy the shares.
EPS is used by investors as a measure of the performance of companies in
which they invest or might possibly invest. Investors are usually interested in
changes in a companys EPS over time trends and also in the size of EPS
relative to the current market price of the companys shares.
EPS should therefore be calculated by all companies in a standard way, so that
investors can obtain a reliable comparison between the EPS and P/E ratios of
different companies.
773
IAS 33 specifies the profit figure that should be used and explains how to
calculate the appropriate number of shares when there have been changes in
share capital during the period under review.
IAS 33 also describes the concept of dilution which is caused by the existence of
potential ordinary shares.
Each of these issues is dealt with in later sections.
Objective of IAS 33
The objective of IAS 33 is to set out principles for:
Scope of IAS 33
IAS 33 applies only to publicly-traded entities or those which are about to be
publicly traded. A publicly-traded entity is an entity whose shares are traded by
the investing public, for example on a stock exchange.
Most publicly-traded entities prepare consolidated financial statements as well as
individual financial statements. When this is the case, IAS 33 requires disclosure
only of EPS based on the figures in the consolidated financial statements.
Definition
Definition
An ordinary share is an equity instrument that is subordinate to all other classes
of equity instruments.
The ordinary shares used in the EPS calculation are those entitled to the residual
profits of the entity, after dividends relating to all other shares have been paid. As
stated earlier, if you are given an examination question on this topic, preference
shares are not ordinary shares because they give more rights to their holders
than ordinary shares.
Preference shares and EPS
Preference shares are not ordinary shares. The interest of preference
shareholders is in the company is pre-defined as opposed to that of ordinary
shareholders who have a residual interest in the company. Since EPS is a
measure of earnings per ordinary share in a financial year, preference shares are
excluded from the number of shares.
The dividends paid to preference shareholders must therefore be excluded from
the total earnings for the period. A broad definition of earnings is therefore profit
after tax less preference dividends paid.
774
share options and warrants. Options and warrants are financial instruments
that give the holder the right (but not the obligation) to purchase new
ordinary shares at some time in the future, at a fixed price;
shares that will be issued if certain contractual conditions are met, such as
contractual conditions relating to the purchase of a business.
The chapter explains the calculation of basic EPS and then the calculation of
diluted EPS.
775
Basic EPS
Total earnings
the earnings figure that must be used being the net profit (or loss)
attributable to ordinary shareholders during a period (commonly referred to
as total earnings); and
776
The total earnings figure must be adjusted for the interests of preference
shareholders before in can be used in EPS calculations.
Preference shares
Preference shares must be classified as equity or liability in accordance with the
rules in IAS 32: Financial Instruments: Presentation.
If a class of preference shares is classified as equity, any dividend relating to that
share is recognised in equity. Any such dividend must be deducted from the profit
or loss from continuing operations as stated above.
If a class of preference shares is classified as liability (redeemable preference
shares), any dividend relating to that share is recognised as a finance cost in the
statement of profit or loss. It is already deducted from the profit or loss from
continuing operations and no further adjustment need be made.
Example: Basic EPS
In the year ended 31 December Year 1, Entity G made profit after tax of Rs.
3,500,000.
Of this, Rs. 3,000,000 was from continuing operations and Rs. 500,000 from
discontinued operations.
It paid ordinary dividends of Rs. 150,000 and preference dividends of Rs. 65,000.
The preference shares were correctly classified as liabilities in accordance with
IAS 32.
Entity G had 1 million ordinary shares in issue throughout the year.
Entity Gs basic EPS for the year ended 31 December Year 1 is calculated as
follows:
Net profit (or loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders during a period
EPS =
weighted average number of shares in issue during the period
=
Rs. 3,000,000
1,000,000
Rs. 500,000
1,000,000
777
Rs. 500,000
1,000,000
778
Note that the Rs. 100,000 deducted above would be deducted irrespective of
whether a dividend had been declared or not. However, if these had been noncumulative then the dividend would have been deducted only in case of
declaration by the company.
Increasing rate preference shares:
These are preference shares that provide for a low initial dividend to compensate
an entity for selling the preference shares at a discount, or an above-market
dividend in later periods to compensate investors for purchasing preference
shares at a premium.
According to the rules contained in IAS 32: Financial instruments: Presentation
and IAS 39: Financial instruments: Recognition and measurement the discount or
premium arising on the issue of increasing rate preference shares is amortised
using the effective interest method and treated as a preference dividend for the
purposes of calculating earnings per share. In addition, there may be other
elements amortised such as transaction costs.
All these elements should be deducted in arriving at the earnings attributed to
ordinary equity holders.
Example: Increasing rate preference shares
Entity D issued non-convertible, non-redeemable class A cumulative preference
shares of Rs. 100 par value on Year 1.
The class A preference shares are entitled to a cumulative annual dividend of Rs.
7 per share starting in Year 4.
At the time of issue, the market rate dividend yield on the class A preference
shares was 7% per annum.
Thus, Entity D could have expected to receive proceeds of approximately Rs. 100
per class A preference share if the dividend rate of Rs. 7 per share had been in
effect at the date of issue.
There was, however, to be no dividend paid for the first three years after issue.
In consideration of these dividend payment terms, the class A preference shares
were issued at Rs. 81.63 per share, i.e. at a discount of Rs. 18.37 per share.
(The issue price can be calculated by taking the present value of Rs. 100,
discounted at 7 per cent over a three-year period).
779
87.34
93.46
6.12
6.54
93.46
100.00
100
7.00
107.00
(7)
780
a class of ordinary shares with a different dividend rate from that of another
class of ordinary shares.
Profit or loss for the period is allocated to the different classes of shares and
participating equity instruments in accordance with their dividend rights or other
rights to participate in undistributed earnings.
To calculate basic earnings per share:
Step 1: Adjust profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent
entity as previously discussed.
Step 2: Allocate the profit or loss to ordinary shares and participating equity
instruments to the extent that each instrument shares in earnings as if all of the
profit or loss for the period had been distributed. The total profit or loss allocated
to each class of equity instrument is determined by adding together the amount
allocated for dividends and the amount allocated for a participation feature.
Step 3: Divide the total amount of profit or loss allocated to each class of equity
instrument by the number of outstanding instruments to which the earnings are
allocated to determine the earnings per share for the instrument.
781
33,000
21,000
(54,000)
Undistributed earnings
46,000
Note: It is irrelevant whether the ordinary dividend has been paid or not.
The point is that the ordinary shareholders would be entitled to Rs. 2.1 per
share before a further distribution to the preference shareholders could
take place.
Allocation of the undistributed earnings
Let A be the allocation of undistributed earnings per ordinary share.
Let B be the allocation per preference share.
Therefore, the undistributed earnings belongs to each group as follows:
(10,000A) + (6,000B) = Rs. 46,000
But Bs entitlement is one quarter that of As so the equation simplifies to:
(10,000A) + (0.25 6,000A) = Rs. 46,000
Therefore
Therefore
Final allocation
A = Rs. 4
B = Rs. 1
Participating preference
share
Distributed
earnings
Undistributed
earnings
Total
Per share
Total
(u 6,000)
Rs. 5.50
33,000
Rs. 2.10
21,000
Rs. 1.00
6,000
Rs. 4.00
40,000
Rs. 6.50
39,000
Rs. 6.10
61,000
EPS
Ordinary share
Total
Per share
(u 10,000)
EPS
782
Bonus issues
Rights issues (issue of shares for consideration but at less than the full
market price of the share).
783
5,000,000
1,000,000
u 3/12
1,250,000
1 April to 30 June
New issue on the 1 July
6,000,000
1,000,000
u 3/12
1,500,000
1 July to 31 October
New issue on the 1 November
7,000,000
500,000
u 4/12
2,333,333
7,500,000
u 2/12
1,250,000
6,333,333
Date
1 January to 31 March
New issue on the 1 April
Number of
shares
6,000,000
1,000,000
1 April to 31 December
7,000,000
Time
factor
u 3/12
u 9/12
Weighted
average
number
1,500,000
5,250,000
6,750,000
784
Practice question
Time
factor
Weighted
average
number
1 January to 31 March
Receipt of partly of balance on
partly paid shares (25% of
1,000,000)
6,000,000
u 3/12
1,500,000
1 April to 31 December
6,250,000
u 9/12
4,687,500
Date
250,000
6,187,500
EPS = Rs. 24,750,000/6,187,500 shares = Rs. 4
785
5
=
4
786
Date
1 January to 30 June
Bonus issue on 1 July
Number of
shares
4,000,000
1,000,000
Time
factor
6/12
1 July to 31 December
5,000,000
6/12
Bonus
fraction
5/4
Weighted
average
number
2,500,000
2,500,000
5,000,000
787
In order to ensure that the EPS in the year of the bonus issue is comparable with
the previous years EPS, IAS 33 requires that the weighted average number of
shares should be calculated as if the bonus shares had always been in issue.
This means that:
the current periods shares are adjusted as if the bonus shares were issued
on the first day of the year; and
the comparative EPS for the previous year is restated on the same basis.
Year 5
Year 4
Rs. 4
Rs. 4
Practice question
788
The issue price of the new shares in a rights issue is always below the current
market price for the shares already in issue. This means that they include a
bonus element which must be taken into account in the calculation of the
weighted average number of shares. Also note that any comparatives must be
restated by multiplying them by the inverse of the rights issue bonus fraction.
The rights issue bonus fraction is calculated as follows:
Formula: Rights issue bonus issue fraction
Actual cum rights price
Theoretical ex rights price
The actual cum-rights price is the market price of the shares before the rights
issue.
The theoretical ex-rights price is the price that the shares ought to be, in
theory, after the rights issue. It is a weighted average price of the shares before
the rights issue and the new shares in the rights issue.
The calculation of the theoretical ex rights price looks a little complicated at first
but it is always done this way. This is demonstrated in the following example.
Example:
Company E had 3,600,000 shares in issue on 1 January Year 2.
It made a 1 for 4 rights issue on 1 June Year 2, at a price of Rs. 40 per share.
(After the rights issue, there will be 1 new share for every 4 shares previously in
issue).
The share price just before the rights issue was Rs. 50.
Total earnings in the financial year to 31 December Year 2 were Rs. 25,125,000.
The reported EPS in Year 1 was Rs. 6.4.
EPS for the year to 31 December Year 2 and the adjusted EPS for Year 1 for
comparative purposes are calculated as follows:
Theoretical ex--rights price
4 existing shares have a cum rights value of (4 Rs. 50)
1 new share is issued for
5 shares after the issue have a theoretical value of
Rs.
200
40
240
Date
1 January to 31 May
Rights issue on 1 June
Number of
shares
3,600,000
900,000
Time
factor
5/12
1 June to 31 December
4,500,000
7/12
Rights
fraction
50/48
Weighted
average
number of
shares
1,562,500
2,625,000
4,187,500
789
Calculation of EPS
EPS Year 2 = Rs. 25,125,000/4,187,500 = Rs. 6 per share
Comparative EPS in Year 1 = Rs. 6.4 (Rs. 48/Rs. 50) = Rs. 6.14 per share
Practice question
790
DILUTED EPS
Section overview
791
The dividend or interest reduces total earnings. However, if they had already
been converted into ordinary shares (and the calculation of diluted EPS is based
on this assumption) the dividends or interest would not have been payable. Total
earnings would therefore have been higher. To calculate the diluted EPS, total
earnings are adjusted to allow for this.
The weighted average number of shares must also be adjusted. The method of
making this adjustment is different for:
For convertible bonds, add back the interest charge on the bonds in the
year less the tax relief relating to that interest. Total earnings will increase
by the interest saved less tax.
Number of shares
The weighted average number of shares is increased, by adding the maximum
number of new shares that would be created if all the potential ordinary shares
were converted into actual ordinary shares.
The additional number of shares is calculated on the assumption that they were
in issue from the beginning of the year or from the date of issue whichever is
later.
792
12,000,000
Earnings (Rs.))
36,000,000
EPS (Rs.))
3
Dilution:
Number of shares
1,200,000
4,000,000 u 30/100
Add back interest:
5% u Rs. 4,000,000
200,000
(60,000)
Adjusted figures
13,200,000
36,140,000
2.74
793
On 31 March Year 11
10,000,000
Earnings (Rs.))
40,870,000
EPS (Rs.)
4.087
Dilution:
Number of shares
2 million u 25/100 u 9/12
375,000
90,000
(27,000)
10,375,000
40,933,000
3.94
794
795
Step 2:
Step 3
Step 4
Rs. 10,000,000
(250,000)
150,000
Rs. 40
400,000
Number of
shares
Earnings (Rs.))
5,000,000
25,000,000
25,000,000
4.85
EPS (Rs.)
Dilution:
Number of shares
Adjusted figures
150,000
5,150,000
When the exercise price of the option is less than the share price they are
said to be in the money.
When the exercise price of the option is more than the share price they are
said to be out of the money.
In the money options are always dilutive. Out of the money options are always
not dilutive (or antidilutive as IAS 33 describes them).
796
797
Step 1:
Rs. 105,000,000
Rs. 15,000,000
Rs. 120,000,000
Step 2:
Step 3
Step 4
Rs. 300
400,000
100,000
500,000
Number of
shares
6,000,000
Earnings (Rs.))
30,000,000
EPS (Rs.)
5
Dilution:
Number of shares
Adjusted figures
100,000
6,100,000
30,000,000
4.91
798
5,000,000
Rs. 15,000,000
Rs. 80
799
150,000
Earnings per
incremental
share
Rs.
0.00
Ranking
1st
Convertible bonds
4% Rs. 5,000,000
less tax 30%
200,000
(60,000)
140,000
Rs. 5,000,000 u
40/100
2,000,000
140,000
2,000,000
0.07
2nd
Preference shares
7% Rs. 1,000,000
100,000 u 1/20
70,000
70,000
5,000
5,000
14.0
3rd
Diluted EPS is calculated as follows (taking these three dilutive potential ordinary
shares in order of their ranking):
Number of
shares
Earnings
EPS
Rs.
Rs.
As reported, basic EPS
15,000,000
5,000,000
3.000
Options
Diluted EPS, options
only
Convertible bonds
Diluted EPS, options
and convertible bonds
Convertible preference
shares
Diluted EPS, options
and all convertibles
150,000
15,000,000
5,150,000
140,000
2,000,000
15,140,000
7,150,000
70,000
5,000
15,210,000
7,155,000
2.913
Dilutive
2.12
Dilutive
2.13
Not
dilutive
The convertible preference shares are not dilutive, and the reported diluted EPS
should be Rs. 2.12 (and not Rs. 2.13).
Emile Woolf International
800
Basic EPS:
31 December Year 2: Rs. 100,000,000/12,000,000 = Rs. 8.33 per share
Diluted EPS:
Number of
shares
12,000,000
Earnings (Rs.))
100,000,000
EPS (Rs.))
8.33
100,000,000
7.69
Dilution:
Number of shares
Adjusted figures
1,000,000
13,000,000
Shares that are issuable after a period of time are not contingently issuable
shares because passage of time is a certainty. When there is an agreement to
issue shares at a point of time in the future they must be included in the diluted
EPS calculation.
801
10,000,000
Conversion::
Number of shares
500,000 u 9/12
375,000
Weighted average
10,375,000
10,375,000
Earnings (Rs.))
40,870,000
EPS (Rs.)
3.94
Dilution:
Number of shares up to the
date of conversion
500,000 u 3/12
125,000
30,000
(9,000)
Adjusted figures
10,500,000
40,891,000
3.89
802
This is difficult to understand but imagine two identical convertible bonds that
allow conversion at any time over a period.
The conversion of Bond A has an impact on the basic EPS from the date of
conversion.
An adjustment is made in respect Bond B for the whole period in the diluted EPS
calculation.
If no further adjustment is made Bond A is shown as being less dilutive than
Bond B because it is only included from the date of conversion. How can actual
shares be less dilutive than potential shares?
In order to correct this anomaly, an adjustment must be made in respect of Bond
A in the diluted EPS calculation for the part of the year before conversion.
803
Presentation requirements
Disclosure requirements
For consolidated accounts, this is the EPS and diluted EPS attributable to the
owners of the parent company.
The basic EPS and diluted EPS should be presented with equal prominence for
all the periods presented (the current year and the previous year). These figures
are presented at the end of the statement of profit or loss.
If the entity presents a separate statement of profit or loss:
the EPS and diluted EPS should be shown in this statement, and
If there is a discontinued operation, the basic EPS and diluted EPS from
discontinued operation should be shown either on the face of the statement of
profit or loss or in a note to the financial statements.
The basic and the diluted EPS should be presented, even if it is a negative figure
(even if it is a loss per share).
804
the alternative EPS must use the same weighted average number of
shares as the IAS 33 calculation
basic and diluted EPS should both be disclosed with equal prominence,
and
the alternative figure must only be shown in the notes, not on the face of
the statement of profit or loss.
805
The standard version of both basic and diluted EPS is based on profit from
continuing operations. This means that the results of discontinued
operations (which may distort total profit) are excluded.
Not all entities use the same accounting policies. It may not always be
possible to make meaningful comparisons between the EPS of different
entities.
EPS does not take account of inflation, so that growth in EPS over time
might be misleading.
806
profit (and more essential to its immediate survival). Changes in the value
of assets (holding gains) can also be an important part of performance for
some entities.
One of the main problems with EPS can be the way that it is used by investors
and others. Users often rely on EPS as the main or only measure of an entitys
performance. Management know this and try to make EPS appear as high as
possible. They may attempt to manipulate the figure by using creative
accounting. They may also make decisions which increase EPS in the short term
but which damage the entity in the longer term.
807
1
Number of
shares
9,000,000
Date
1 January to 30 April
New issue on 1 May
Time
factor
4/12
Weighted
average
number
3,000,000
1,200,000
1 May to 30 September
New issue on 1 October
10,200,000
1,800,000
5/12
4,250,000
1 October to 31 December
12,000,000
3/12
3,000,000
10,250,000
The first new share issue is in May, after 4 months. Therefore the number of
shares at the beginning of the year is given a time factor of 4/12.
(2)
There are 5 months between the two share issues. Therefore, the time factor to
apply to the number of shares after the first issue is 5/12.
(3)
The total number of shares in issue from 1 October to the end of the year (three
months) is 12,000,000. These are given a time weighting of 3/12.
Solution
Date
1 January to 31 March
Issue at full price on 31 March
Number of
shares
2,000,000
500,000
Time
factor
3/12
Bonus
fraction
3/2
Weighted
average
number
750,000
1 April to 30 June
Bonus issue on 1 July
2,500,000
1,250,000
3/12
3/2
937,500
1 July to 31 December
3,750,000
6/12
1,875,000
3,562,500
808
Solution
After the rights issue, there will be 1 new share for every 2 shares previously in issue
Theoretical ex--rights price
2 existing shares have a cum rights value of
1 new share is issued for
(2 Rs. 50)
Rs.
100
20
120
Date
Number of
shares
Time
factor
1 January to 31 March
Rights issue on 1 April
3,000,000
1,500,000
3/12
1 April to 31 July
Issue at full price on 1 August
4,500,000
400,000
4/12
1,500,000
1 August to 31 December
4,900,000
5/12
2,041,667
Rights
fraction
50/40
937,500
4,479,167
Calculation of EPS
EPS Year 7 = Rs. 17,468,750/4,479,167 = Rs. 3.9 per share
EPS Year 6 = Rs. 3.5 40/50 = Rs. 2.8
809
810
CHAPTER
29
Contents
1 Purpose of financial ratio analysis
2 Return on capital, profitability and asset turnover
3 Working capital efficiency ratios
4 Liquidity ratios
5 Debt ratios
6 Investor ratios
7 Limitations of interpretation techniques
8 Financial ratios and examination technique
811
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 2
812
Introduction to interpretation
Comparisons with the similar ratios of other, similar companies for the
same period.
liquidity ratios;
debt ratios;
investor ratios.
813
last years profit margin, or the companys profit margin for the past few
years
b.
c.
the industry average (the average profit margin for companies in the
industry)
d.
For example, if the budgeted profit margin was 25%, an actual profit margin of
20% might suggest that management have under-performed in the period
814
Note that a ratio does not explain why any under-performance or outperformance has occurred. Ratios are used to indicate areas of good or weak
performance, but management then have to investigate to identify the cause.
Example: Possible explanations
A company achieved a profit margin of 6% in the year just ended. This was less
than the budgeted profit margin of 10%, and less than the profit margin in the
previous year, which was 8%.
The actual profit margin of 6% indicates disappointing performance, but
management should investigate the cause or causes.
For example, they might find that any of the following reasons might explain the
low profit margin:
a.
Increased competition has forced down sales prices and so reduced profit
margins.
b.
Advances in technology have lowered costs but prices have come down
even more.
c.
Raw material costs have risen and the higher costs could not be passed on
to the customers.
d.
There have been higher employment costs due to pay rises for
manufacturing employees, but these could not be passed on to the
customers.
e.
The company buys most of its supplies from foreign countries, and adverse
movements in exchange rates for its purchases have increased costs and
reduced profit margins.
f.
There has been a change in the companys sales mix, and the company has
sold a larger proportion of cheaper and lower-margin products than
expected.
815
Profitability
Financial position
Inventory turnover
Receivables turnover
Payables period
ROCE
ROSF
Gross profit margin
Overheads %
Short-term liquidity
Efficiency
Long-term solvency
Current ratio
Quick ratio
Gearing
Interest
Investor ratios
EPS
PE
Dividend yield
Dividend cover
The main ratios will be considered in more detail. For the purpose of your
examination, you need to know how to calculate each ratio, but you must also
understand why each ratio, or each category of ratios, might be of particular
interest to a specific user group.
An examination question may ask you to provide an analysis of financial
statements for a particular user. It will not tell you which ratios to calculate.
Instead, you will have to decide for yourself which ratios may provide useful
information for that user. Therefore you should learn to identify and select the
appropriate ratios for each user group, and then analyse what the ratio appears
to show, from the point of view of that user.
lenders;
employees;
suppliers;
customers;
816
Each user group has different information needs, but as a general rule financial
statements prepared in accordance with IFRSs should provide all user groups
with most of their needs. Each group is interested in financial performance,
financial position and cash flows, but some users are mainly interested in
performance and profitability, while others may be more interested in liquidity and
gearing or other matters.
For example:
A bank that has been approached to lend money to an entity needs to know
whether it will receive interest payments when these are due and whether
the money that it lends will eventually be repaid. A bank manager will
normally be most interested in cash flows and liquidity ratios (current ratio,
acid test ratio) gearing and interest cover. A potential lender will also be
interested in predicting future performance as without sales there will be no
cash.
Any analysis should focus on the needs of the user. What do they need to know?
What are they interested in? What decision do they need to make?
The table below lists the user groups, indicates the information that they require
from published reports and accounts, and suggests which items in the financial
statements will be of most interest to each group.
User
Information needs
Items of interest
Investors/
potential
investors
Security of dividend
payments
Information to make
decisions about buying,
selling or holding shares
Dividend cover
Events and
announcements after the
reporting period
Share price
Corporate governance
reports. Narrative
business review.
817
User
Information needs
Items of interest
Employees
Directors remuneration
Cash flow
Interest cover
Growth record
Growth record
Cash flow
Market share
Regulation of activities
Taxation
Obtaining government
statistics
Directors report
Lenders
(banks,
bondholders)
Suppliers
Customers
Government
General public
Management are not included as a user group because they should have access
to much more detailed information about the companys financial position and
performance, from internal reports and budgets.
818
Return on assets
Dupont analysis
Capital employed is the share capital and reserves, plus long-term debt capital
such as bank loans, bonds and loan stock.
Where possible, use the average capital employed during the year. This is
usually the average of the capital employed at the beginning of the year and end
of the year.
819
Share capital
Share premium
Retained earnings
Bank loans
1 January
Year 1
Rs.
200,000
100,000
500,000
200,000
31 December
Year 1
Rs.
200,000
100,000
600,000
500,000
1,000,000
1,400,000
Rs.
210,000
(65,000)
145,000
Rs.
W2
210,000
30,000
240,000
Capital employed
Rs.
1,000,000
1,400,000
2,400,000
2
1,200,000
This ROCE figure can be compared with the ROCE achieved by the
company in previous years, and with the ROCE achieved by other
companies, particularly competitors.
Groups of companies and ROCE
To calculate the ROCE for a group of companies, it is necessary to decide what
to do with any non-controlling interest (minority interest). Since capital employed
includes all the debt capital in the group, it makes sense to include the noncontrolling interest (minority interest) in the capital employed.
ROCE should therefore be measured as profit before interest and tax as a
proportion of total capital employed, including the non-controlling interest.
Emile Woolf International
820
=
Share capital and reserves
u 100
The average value of shareholder capital should be used if possible. This is the
average of the shareholder capital at the beginning and the end of the year.
Profit after tax is used as the most suitable measure of return for the
shareholders, since this is a measure of earnings (available for payment as
dividends or for reinvestment in the business).
Example: Return on shareholder capital
The following figures relate to Company X for Year 1.
Share capital
Share premium
Retained earnings
Shareholder capital
Bank loans
1 January
Year 1
Rs.
200,000
100,000
500,000
800,000
200,000
31 December
Year 1
Rs.
200,000
100,000
600,000
900,000
500,000
1,000,000
1,400,000
Rs.
210,000
(65,000)
145,000
Shareholder capital
Rs.
800,000
900,000
1,700,000
2
821
850,000
u 100
The share capital and reserves should not include the non-controlling interest in
the equity reserves.
Using ROCE or ROSC
It is not necessary to calculate both these ratios. The ratio that you
calculate should be the ratio that is of the greatest interest to the particular
user or user group. For example, management may be most interested in
ROCE, but an equity investor would be interested in ROSC.
ROCE or ROSC could be compared to real interest rates that are currently
available to investors in the market. For example, if a company has a
ROCE of 3% when interest rates of 5% are available in the bond markets, a
shareholder might be advised to consider selling his shares. However, it is
important to remember that bond yields are returns calculated from the
market price of bonds; whereas ROCE and ROSC are calculated from
financial statements and are not market rates of return.
822
ROA =
Assets
The normal convention is to use total assets which includes both current and
non-current assets. However, other variations are sometimes used such as noncurrent assets only.
the profitability of the goods or services that the entity has sold
the volume of sales that the entity has achieved with the capital and assets
it has employed: this is known as asset utilisation or asset turnover.
=
Sales
u 100
Gross profit (sales minus the cost of sales) = gross profit ratio
823
Rs.
210,000
(65,000)
145,000
b)
W1
Rs.
210,000
30,000
240,000
It is also useful to monitor the ratio of different types of cost to sales. The
following ratios can be useful to highlight an unexpected change in a period or to
indicate a difference between the company and another in a similar industry:
Sales
=
Share capital + reserves + long term debt
u 100
824
Rs.1,200,000
Profit/sales
Sales/capital
employed
240,000
1,200,000
240,000
5,800,000
5,800,000
1,200,000
20%
4.14%
4.83 times
Sales
Assets
825
Assets
Profit
=
Capital employed
Capital employed
The DuPont equation provides a broader picture of the return the company is
earning on its capital employed. It indicates where a company's strength lies and
where there is a room for improvement.
Example: Dupont analysis
Company A and B operate in the same market and are of the same size. Both
earn a return of 15% on equity.
The following table shows their respective net profit margin, asset turnover and
financial leverage.
Company A
Company B
10%
10%
1.5
10.5
826
=
Credit sales
u 365 days
Trade receivables should be the average value of receivables during the year.
This is the average of the receivables at the beginning of the year and the
receivables at the end of the year.
However, the value for receivables at the end of the year is also commonly used.
827
Sales are usually taken as total sales for the year. However, if sales are analysed
into credit sales and cash sales, it is probably more appropriate to use the figure
for credit sales only.
The average time to collect money from credit customers should not be too long.
A long average time to collect suggests inefficient collection of amounts due from
receivables.
=
Cost of sales
u 365 days
In theory, inventory should be the average value of inventory during the year.
This is the average of the inventory at the beginning of the year and the inventory
at the end of the year.
However, the value for inventory at the end of the year is also commonly used,
particularly in examinations.
=
Purchases
u 365 days
Trade payables should be the average value of trade payables during the year.
This is the average of the trade payables at the beginning of the year and the
trade payables at the end of the year.
However, the value for trade payables at the end of the year is also commonly
used
When the cost of purchases is not available, the cost of sales should be used
instead. This figure is obtained from the profit and loss information in the
statement of comprehensive income.
828
31 December Year 1
Rs.
300,000
400,000
150,000
Rs.
360,000
470,000
180,000
Inventory
Trade receivables
Trade payables
Sales in Year 1 totalled Rs.3,000,000 and the cost of sales was Rs.1,800,000.
=
Trade receivables
Cost of sales Inventory
Inventory turnover
=
Inventory
Purchases
Payables turnover
=
Trade payables
829
from the time that suppliers are paid for the resources they supply
to the time that cash is received from customers for the goods (or services)
that the entity makes (or provides) with those resources and then sells.
X
X
(X)
Operating cycle
The working capital ratios and the length of the cash cycle should be monitored
over time. The cycle should not be allowed to become unreasonable in length,
with a risk of over-investment or under-investment in working capital.
A positive working capital cycle balances incoming and outgoing payments to
minimise net working capital and maximise free cash flow. For example, a
company that pays its suppliers in 30 days but takes 60 days to collect its
receivables has a working capital cycle of 30 days. This 30 day cycle usually
needs to be funded through a bank operating line, and the interest on this
financing is a carrying cost that reduces the company's profitability.
Growing businesses require cash, and being able to free up cash by shortening
the working capital cycle is the most inexpensive way to grow. Sophisticated
buyers review closely a target's working capital cycle because it provides them
with an idea of the management's effectiveness at managing their balance sheet
and generating free cash flow.
830
Rs.
Sales
1,200,000
Cost of sales:
Opening inventory
250,000
Purchases
1,000,000
1,250,000
Closing inventory
(250,000)
Cost of sales
(1,000,000)
Gross profit
200,000
400,000
Trade payables
166,667
Days
91
122
(61)
152
831
LIQUIDITY RATIOS
Section overview
Current ratio
current assets that will soon be converted into cash during the normal cycle
of trade.
It is also assumed that the only immediate payment obligations faced by the
entity are its current liabilities.
There are two ratios for measuring liquidity:
current ratio
The more suitable ratio for use depends on whether inventory is considered a
liquid asset that will soon be used or sold, and converted into cash from sales.
Current assets
Current liabilities
The amounts of current assets and current liabilities in the statement of financial
position at the end of the year may be used. It is not necessary to use average
values for the year.
It is sometimes suggested that there is an ideal current ratio of 2.0 times (2:1).
However, this is not necessarily true and in some industries, much lower current
ratios are normal. It is important to assess the liquidity ratios by considering:
832
=
Current liabilities
The amounts of current assets and current liabilities in the statement of financial
position at the end of the year may be used. It is not necessary to use average
values for the year.
This ratio is a better measurement of liquidity than the current ratio when
inventory turnover times are very slow, and inventory is not a liquid asset.
It is sometimes suggested that there is an ideal quick ratio of 1.0 times (1:1).
However, this is not necessarily true and in some industries, much lower quick
ratios are normal. As indicated earlier, it is important to assess liquidity by looking
at changes in the ratio over time and comparisons with other companies and the
industry norm.
833
DEBT RATIOS
Section overview
Debt ratios are used to assess whether the total debts of the entity are within control
and are not excessive.
=
Share capital + reserves
u 100
Alternatively:
Formula: Gearing ratio
Long term debt
Gearing ratio
=
Share capital + reserves + long term debt
u 100
It is usually appropriate to use the figures from the statement of financial position
at the end of the year. However, a gearing ratio can also be calculated from
average values for the year.
When there are preference shares, it is usual to include the preference shares
within debt capital.
A company is said to be high-geared or highly-leveraged when its debt capital
exceeds its share capital and reserves. This means that a company is highgeared when the gearing ratio is above either 50% or 100%, depending on which
method is used to calculate the ratio.
A company is said to be low-geared when the amount of its debt capital is less
than its share capital and reserves. This means that a company is low-geared
when the gearing ratio is less than either 50% or 100%, depending on which
method is used to calculate the ratio.
A high level of gearing may indicate the following:
The entity has a high level of debt, which means that it might be difficult for
the entity to borrow more when it needs to raise new capital.
834
High gearing can indicate a risk that the entity will be unable to meet its
payment obligations to lenders, when these obligations are due for
payment.
The gearing ratio can be used to monitor changes in the amount of debt of a
company over time. It can also be used to make comparisons with the gearing
levels of other, similar companies, to judge whether the company has too much
debt, or perhaps too little, in its capital structure.
Gearing and consolidated accounts
The gearing ratio for a group of companies is difficult to interpret, because the
debt will be spread over several entities in the group.
When measuring gearing, the total capital or equity capital (the denominator in
the ratio) should include non-controlling interests (minority interests).
=
Interest charges in the year
Profit before interest and taxation is calculated by adding the interest charges for
the year to the figure for profit before taxation.
An interest cover ratio of less than 3.0 times is considered very low, suggesting
that the company could be at risk from too much debt in relation to the amount of
profits it is earning.
835
Rs.000
5,800
Share capital
Reserves
1,200
2,400
3,600
1,500
Current liabilities
5,100
700
5,800
Rs.000
700
(230)
470
Taxation
(140)
330
The following ratios can be calculated to shed light on the companys gearing in
Year 6 (compared to previous years or to other companies).
Gearing ratio: 1,500/5,100 u 100 = 29.4%
Debt to equity ratio: 1,500/3,600 u 100 = 41.7%
Interest cover: 700/230 = 3.04 times
836
INVESTOR RATIOS
Section overview
Dividend yield
Dividend cover
Investor ratios are of interest to investors in shares and bonds and their advisers.
Some of these measure stock market performance. Earnings per share (EPS) and the
price earnings ratio (P/E ratio) were described in an earlier chapter.
=
Earnings per share
837
=
Current market price per share
u 100
This is a measure of the return that a shareholder can obtain (the dividend
received) in relation to the current value of the investment in the shares (the price
of the shares). A high dividend yield might seem attractive to investors, but in
practice companies with a high dividend yield might have a relatively low share
price.
There are two things to note:
Dividend yield reflects the dividend policy of the entity, not its actual
performance. Management decides on the amount of the dividend and this
may not only depend on earnings, but on the amount that must be retained
for future investment in EPS growth.
The ratio is based on the most recent dividend, but the current share price
may move up and down in response to the markets expectations about
future dividends. This may lead to distortion in the ratio.
=
Dividend per share
or
Earnings
=
Dividends
A low dividend cover (for example, less than 2), suggests that dividends may be
cut if there is a fall in profits.
838
P/E ratio =
1,400,000
= Rs.1.17.
1,200,000
5.50
= 4.7
1.17
450,000
= 0.38c
1,200,000
Dividend yield =
0.38
u 100% = 6.9%
5.50
Dividend cover =
1,400,000
1.17
= 3.1 times or
= 3.1 times
450,000
0.38
839
Introduction
Non-financial information
Other information
7.1 Introduction
There are several limitations or weaknesses in the use of interpretation
techniques for analysing the financial position and financial performance of
companies. Some of these are limitations of ratio analysis (the method of
interpretation most often used) and some are limitations of financial statements
and financial information.
Most of the data for calculating financial ratios comes from the financial
statements.
840
IAS 8 states that an entity should not change its accounting policies unless the
change is required by an accounting standard or it will result in more relevant and
reliable information. Therefore changes should not happen often.
Where there has been a change in an accounting policy, IAS 8 also requires
comparative figures to be restated and information to be disclosed. However,
changes in accounting policies and accounting estimates can still make it difficult
to compare the financial statements of an entity over time, particularly if analysis
is based on extracts rather than the full published financial statements.
The reported profit will be less (or the loss will be higher) than with
historical cost accounting (HCA).
The return on capital employed will be lower, because the reported profit
will be lower and the value of capital employed will be higher.
841
Even where two entities operate in the same industry, comparisons can be
misleading. Entities can operate in different markets (for example, high
volume/low margin sales and low volume/high margin sales). The size of an
entity can affect the way it operates and therefore its ratios. For example,
large entities can often negotiate more favourable terms with suppliers than
small ones.
842
there are parties that could enforce transactions on the entity that are not
on an arms length basis.
843
Businesses and the transactions that they enter into are becoming
increasingly complex. Much information that is relevant to users cannot be
expressed easily in monetary terms or in numbers.
Most large and listed entities now include a Business Review, or an Operating
and Financial Review (sometimes called Management Discussion and Analysis)
in their published financial statements. This is a narrative report which sets out
managements analysis of the business. Such a review is a legal requirement for
many companies within the European Union.
At present entities reporting under IFRSs do not have to publish any non-financial
information of this kind. Recently the IASB issued a non-mandatory Practice
Statement on Management Commentary. It is up to companies or individual
legal jurisdictions to decide whether to follow this guidance.
Useful non-financial information
Useful non-financial information could include the following:
a description of the main risks and uncertainties facing the entity and the
ways in which these risks are managed
details of any significant factors or events that may have an impact on the
entitys performance in future
details of any significant factors or events that may have an impact on the
entitys cash flows in future
information about key relationships with other entities and transactions with
related parties, including management
a description of the entitys research and development activities (if any) and
of any material intangible assets, including internally generated intangible
assets that have not been recognised in the balance sheet
844
845
Management strategy
Financial ratios should be interpreted in the context of all other relevant
information that is available about the company. For example, management may
have decided on a strategy of cutting profit margins in the short term in order to
win market share. This would affect the current profit margin, but in the long run
should result in higher sales and more profits.
846
Introduction
Approach to questions
Avoiding pitfalls
8.1 Introduction
Examination questions on financial ratio analysis usually require sound
examination technique to construct a good answer. The following guidelines
suggest the approach you should take and indicate the mistakes and pitfalls to
avoid.
At this level, you are unlikely to get a question that simply asks you just to
calculate ratios. You may be asked to consider the accounting treatment of
particular items in the financial statements and the effect that this will have on the
entitys ratios.
For example, if an entity has incorrectly treated a sale and repurchase
transaction as a genuine sale and not as a loan secured on an asset, then there
will be a significant effect on the entitys ratios. For example, the gearing ratio will
not show the true position of the entitys debt as it will exclude the secured loan.
Return on capital employed will also be affected as the incorrect treatment of the
transaction removes the asset from the statement of financial position, thus
increasing ROCE.
Additionally, consider the points below which provide specific guidance on
aspects of the question that you may have to answer.
What information is the user interested in? Why has the user requested the
report?
Background information
Establish some of the basic background information.
847
Is the business seasonal? If so, seasonal trading may distort the year-end
figures in the statement of financial position, particularly for inventory,
receivables, cash and payables.
Have there been any key transactions during the year that may affect
comparisons with previous years? For example, has the company raised a
substantial amount of new finance, or has it acquired a major new
subsidiary, entered a new market with a new product, or disposed of a
business operation?
Non-current assets.
(1)
(2)
Investments.
(1)
(2)
Working capital.
(1)
(2)
Look at the amounts of current assets and current liabilities. Does the
company have net current assets or net current liabilities?
Loans.
(1)
Have any loans been repaid in the year? If so, how was the
repayment financed?
Have there been any new issues of shares during the year? If so, is it
clear why the new shares were issued? For example, have new
848
Have there been any significant changes in reserves during the year?
Interest. Is the interest charge high in relation to the amount of debt in the
statement of financial position? If it is high, has any debt been repaid in the
year?
Are there any unusual one-off items in profit or loss? If so, what are they?
You should have an expectation in your mind about the measurements and ratios
that you should expect to find. If the actual measurements or ratios are different
from what you expect, you may need to think about the reasons for the
unexpected results.
For example, you may expect the company to be profitable. If it made a loss, you
will need to look for the reasons.
Calculate financial ratios
Having reviewed the financial information, you should calculate relevant key
ratios.
Show the formulae and numbers you have used to calculate the ratios. Do
not just write down the ratio by copying it from your calculator. The
examiner will want to see where your figure came from, to make sure that
you understand what you are doing.
If the examination question provides some financial ratios, look for ratios
that have not been given. Could any of the missing ratios be significant?
Further information
An examination question might ask for suggestions about what further
information might be helpful. If so, set up your answer as an appendix to your
memo or report, and build your answer as you work through your answer to the
question. Examples of information that might be missing include the following:
849
Additional information to calculate further ratios, such as the share price for
calculating the P/E ratio or dividend yield
Segmental analysis
Reasons for specific changes not explained by the information given in the
question.
Make sure you answer all the requirements of the question. If you dont you
will lose marks.
Most marks in the exam are likely to be for specific, relevant comments
rather than solely for computations. Do not calculate too many ratios as it
is time-consuming and you will not have time to write your answer. Be
selective and only calculate a ratio if it will add value to your answer.
Use all the information. Some valuable information about the company is
usually given in the introductory paragraph in an examination question.
Make sure that you read and use this information.
When making comparisons, make sure that the benchmark you select for
the comparison is suitable. For example, if two companies are being
compared:
850
comment. For example, stating that There has been a fall in non-current
asset has no value on its own. A better answer would be Non-current
assets have decreased despite a rise in sales. You might then go on to
comment that non-current assets are being over-used and are not being
replaced, perhaps because of the poor cash position of the company.
The highest marks will be awarded for linking together the information that
you analyse. For example: Interest charges have remained more or less
the same as in the previous year, despite a decrease in the debt in the
statement of financial position. This may be explained by the company
repaying a large amount of debt shortly before the year end.
Use the company name in your answer. This will help you to focus your
mind on the circumstances of the company, and avoid writing about
financial ratios in general terms (and so failing to answer the question).
851
852
CHAPTER
30
Contents
1 IAS 2: Inventories
2 IAS 41: Agriculture
3 IFRS 6: Exploration for and evaluation of mineral
resources
4 IFRS 14: Regulatory deferral accounts
5 Service concession arrangements
6 SIC 7: Introduction of the euro
853
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
B (a) 10
B (a) 12
IAS 2: Inventories
B (a) 32
B (a) 40
B (a) 50
B (a) 55
854
IAS 2: INVENTORY
Section overview
Definition of inventory
Measurement rule
Cost formulas
Disclosure requirements
Assets held for sale. For a retailer, these are items that the business sells
its stock-in trade. For a manufacturer, assets held for sale are usually
referred to as finished goods
IAS 2: Inventories sets out the requirements to be followed when accounting for
inventory.
cost, or
plus transport, handling and other costs directly attributable to the purchase
(carriage inwards), if these costs are additional to the purchase price.
The purchase price excludes any settlement discounts, and is the cost after
deduction of trade discount.
855
Conversion costs
When materials purchased from suppliers are converted into another product in a
manufacturing or assembly operation, there are also conversion costs to add to
the purchase costs of the materials. Conversion costs must be included in the
cost of finished goods and unfinished work in progress.
Conversion costs consist of:
other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and
condition.
costs of indirect labour, including the salaries of the factory manager and
factory supervisors
costs of carriage inwards, if these are not included in the purchase costs of
the materials
856
Rs.
Other costs
126
10
136
Note:
Rs.
750,000
1,000,000
250,000
The Rs. 250,000 that has not been included in inventory is expensed (i.e.
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income).
857
Items currently in store are the items in store immediately before the new
delivery is received.
The retail method
The retail method is often used in the retail industry for measuring inventories of
large numbers of rapidly changing items with similar margins for which it is
impracticable to use other costing methods.
Cost is determined by reducing the sales value of the inventory by the
appropriate percentage gross margin.
The cost and net realisable value should be compared for each separatelyidentifiable item of inventory, or group of similar inventories, rather than for
inventory in total.
Net realisable value might be lower than cost so that the cost of inventories may
not be recoverable in the following circumstances:
858
The accounting policy adopted for measuring inventories, including the cost
measurement method used.
859
Accounting treatment
Government grants
Disclosure requirements
Definitions
The following definitions are relevant to IAS 41:
Definitions
Agricultural activities the management by an entity of the biological
transformation and harvest of biological assets:
a.
for sale; or
b.
c.
Biological asset a living animal or plant, such as sheep, cows, rice, wheat,
potatoes and so on.
Biological transformation means the processes of growth, production,
degeneration and procreation that cause changes in the quality or the quantity of
a biological asset
Agricultural produce is the harvested product of the entitys biological assets.
Harvest the detachment of produce from a biological asset or the cessation of a
biological assets life.
860
Illustration: Definitions
A farmer has a field of lambs (b
biological assets).
As the lambs grow they go through biological transformation.
As sheep they are able to procreate and lambs will be born (additional biological
assets) and the wool from the sheep provides a source of revenue for the farmer
(a
agricultural produce).
Once the wool has been sheared from the sheep (h
harvested), IAS 2 requires that
it be accounted for as regular inventory.
Definitions
A bearer plant is a living plant that:
a.
b.
c.
Biological assets
sheep
trees in a timber plantation
dairy cattle
cotton plants
sugarcane
Agricultural produce
wool
felled trees
milk
harvested cotton
harvested cane
tobacco plants
tea bushes
fruit tress
oil palm
rubber trees
picked leaves
picked leaves
picked fruit
picked fruit
harvested latex
cured tobacco
tea
processed fruit
palm oil
rubber products
Plants such as tea bushes, grape vines, oil palms and rubber trees, usually meet
the definition of a bearer plant and are within the scope of IAS 16 Property, Plant
and equipment. However, the produce growing on bearer plants, for example,
tea leaves, grapes, oil palm fruit and latex, is within the scope of IAS 41.
Note that there is no animal equivalent of a bearer plant. Thus, cows kept for
milk are within the scope of IAS 41.
861
it is probable that future benefits will flow from the asset to the entity, and
Measurement
Fair value is the quoted price in an active market. It is presumed that fair
values can be measured reliably for biological assets. If this is not so, the
biological asset should be measured at its cost minus any accumulated
depreciation or impairment.
862
If the biological asset has been measured at cost because fair value could not be
measured reliably, then the requirements of IAS 20 Accounting for government
grants should be applied.
the aggregate gain or loss arising during the current period on initial
recognition of biological assets and agricultural produce and from the
change in fair value less costs to sell of biological assets.
depreciation method
If the fair value of biological assets previously measured at cost now becomes
available, certain additional disclosures are required.
Disclosures relating to government grants include the nature and extent of
grants, unfulfilled conditions, and significant decreases expected in the level of
grants.
863
Background
Subsequent measurement
Presentation
Impairment
Disclosure
3.1 Background
The group accounts of listed entities in the EU had to be prepared according to
IFRS for all accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. This
regulation applied to some very large energy companies with securities listed on
EU stock markets.
In the run up to conversion, it was noted that there was no IFRS that dealt with
this area, but there were significant entities which engaged in such activities.
There were different views held globally on the accounting solution and this led to
a number of different accounting treatments.
IFRS 6
IFRS 6 specifies the financial reporting for the exploration for and evaluation of
mineral resources. IFRS 6 applies to expenditure incurred on exploration for and
evaluation of mineral resources but not to those expenditures incurred:
Definitions
Exploration and evaluation assets are exploration and evaluation expenditures
recognised as assets in accordance with the entitys accounting policy.
Exploration and evaluation expenditures are expenditures incurred by an entity in
connection with the expenditures for and evaluation of mineral resources before
the technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource
are demonstrable.
864
To justify a change, The company must demonstrate that the change brings the
financial statements closer to meeting the IAS 8 criteria but the change need not
achieve full compliance with those criteria
exploratory drilling;
trenching;
sampling; and
865
cost model; or
revaluation model
3.5 Presentation
Exploration and evaluation assets must be classified according to the nature of
the assets acquired as:
3.6 Impairment
Exploration and evaluation assets must be:
assessed for impairment when there are indications that the carrying
amount may exceed recoverable amount
indication that the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation asset
is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale
866
3.7 Disclosure
Entities must disclose information that identifies and explains the amounts
recognised arising from the exploration and evaluation of mineral resources
867
Introduction
Overview of requirements
4.1 Introduction
Some countries regulate prices that can be charged for certain goods and
services. Such goods and services are said to be rate regulated.
Definitions
Rate-regulated activities: An entitys activities that are subject to rate regulation.
Rate regulation: A framework for establishing the prices that can be charged to
customers for goods or services and that framework is subject to oversight
and/or approval by a rate regulator.
Regulatory deferral account balance: The balance of any expense (or income)
account that would not be recognised as an asset or a liability in accordance with
other Standards, but that qualifies for deferral because it is included, or is
expected to be included, by the rate regulator in establishing the rate(s) that can
be charged to customers.
In the absence of an accounting standard on a topic, entities that adopt IFRS
must formulate an accounting policy in accordance with guidance given in IAS 8.
This has led to divergence in practice.
The IASB are engaged in a project on this area but in the meantime have issued
IFRS 14 as an interim measure.
868
being paid for its services over the period of the arrangement
Terminology
Grantor government body that contract with an operator.
Operator private sector participant in a service concession arrangement
An important feature of service concession arrangements is that the operator has
a contractual obligation to provide services to the public on behalf of the public
sector entity.
This interpretation gives guidance to operators on how they must account for
public-to-private service concession arrangements (also known as build-operatetransfer (BOT) arrangements, and rehabilitate-operate-transfer (ROT)). It does
not give guidance on grantor accounting.
Scope
Service concession arrangements are in the scope of IFRIC 12 if:
869
The contract sets out initial prices to be levied by the operator and
regulates price revisions
infrastructure that the operator constructs or acquires from a third party for
the purpose of the service arrangement; and
existing infrastructure to which the grantor gives the operator access for the
purpose of the service arrangement
The issue
IFRIC 12 gives guidance to operators on how they must account for service
concession arrangements. Specifically it provides rules on:
operation services;
Consensus
The infrastructure asset must not be recognised as PP&E by the operator. The
operator does not control the asset but merely operates it.
The operator has access to operate the asset in order to provide the public
service on behalf of the grantor.
A grantor might transfer other assets to an operator to be kept or dealt with as it
wishes.
Such assets are not government grants (IAS 20) if they are part of the
consideration for the arrangement.
870
a financial asset; or
an intangible asset
any shortfall between amounts received from users of the public service
and specified or determinable amounts
12
3 to 10
8
Construction services
Operation services
Resurfacing
Forecast
costs
500 pa
10 pa
100
Mark--up
5%
20%
10%
Fair value of
consideration
525 pa
12 pa
110
Rs. m
1,100
96
110
1,306
1,600
294
871
Interest
@
6.18%
Income
recognised
in year
525
525
525
32
525
1,082
1,082
67
12
(200)
961
961
59
12
(200)
833
833
51
12
(200)
696
696
43
12
(200)
551
551
34
12
(200)
397
397
25
122
(200)
344
344
21
12
(200)
177
10
177
11
12
(200)
Year
Amortised
cost c/f
Cash
The interest income (at 6.18%) is recognised in profit or loss together with
the other elements of income.
The amortised cost at each year end is recognised as a financial asset.
The following table shows the movement in the cash balances over the
duration of the agreement (all figures are in Rs. millions).
Year
Cash b/f
Interest
at 6.7%
Cash out
Cash in
Net cash
flow
Cash c/f
(500)
(500)
(500)
(500)
(34)
(500)
(534)
(1,034)
(1,034)
(69)
(10)
200
121
(913)
(913)
(61)
(10)
200
129
(784)
(784)
(53)
(10)
200
137
(646)
(646)
(43)
(10)
200
147
(500)
(500)
(33)
(10)
200
157
(343)
(343)
(23)
(110)
200
67
(276)
(276)
(19)
(10)
200
171
(105)
10
(105)
(7)
(10)
200
183
78
872
Year 1
Financial asset
Credit
525
Revenue (P&L)
525
Costs (P&L)
500
Cash
500
Debit
Year 2
Financial asset (525 + 32)
Credit
557
Revenue (P&L)
525
32
Costs (P&L)
500
34
Cash
534
Debit
Year 3
Credit
121
Revenue (P&L)
12
67
Costs (P&L)
10
69
Cash
121
873
874
Year
Cash b/f
Interest
at 6.7%
Cash out
Cash in
Net cash
flow
Cash c/f
(500)
(500)
(500)
(500)
(34)
(500)
(534)
(1,034)
(1,034)
(69)
(10)
200
121
(913)
(913)
(61)
(10)
200
129
(784)
(784)
(53)
(10)
200
137
(646)
(646)
(43)
(10)
200
147
(500)
(500)
(33)
(10)
200
157
(343)
(343)
(23)
(10)
200
167
(176)
(176)
(19)
(10)
200
171
(5)
(5)
(7)
(10)
200
183
178
10
525
525
34
1,084
8 years
135
Note that interest incurred after the intangible asset is brought into use
must be expensed to profit or loss.
875
Year 1
Intangible asset
Credit
525
Revenue (P&L)
525
Costs (P&L)
500
Cash
500
Debit
Year 2
Intangible asset (525 + 34)
Credit
559
Revenue (P&L)
525
Costs (P&L)
500
534
Debit
Year 3
Credit
Intangible asset
135
Revenue (P&L)
200
145
69
121
876
significant terms that may affect the amount, timing and certainty of future
cash flows;
An operator must disclose revenue and profits (losses) recognised in the period
on exchanging construction services for a financial asset or an intangible asset.
877
878
CHAPTER
31
Contents
1 Accounting for the transition to IFRS
2 Presentation and disclosure
879
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
LO 2
880
881
Example: Terminology
A company is preparing its first IFRS financial statements for the year ending 31
December 2016.
The company operates in a regime that requires a single period of comparative
information.
First IFRS reporting period
882
These adjustments are made at the date of transition and lead to restructuring of
the comparative statement of financial position
Full retrospective restatement is a difficult task. IFRS must be applied in its
entirety from the date of transition but there are two categories of exception to full
retrospective restatement before this. These are:
business combinations;
Business combinations
The business combination exemption is actually a series of exemptions relating
to:
883
assets and liabilities recognised under previous GAAP forms the basis for
the recognition of assets and liabilities under IFRS at the date of transition
(subject to adjustments);
IAS 21 requires that goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition of
a foreign operation are retranslated at each reporting date. IFRS 1 allows that
this requirement does not have to be applied to business combinations before the
date of transition.
Deemed cost
This exemption applies to:
Exploration and evaluation assets for oil and gas under IFRS 6, and assets
recorded in respect of rate-regulated activities
fair value;
884
at cost;
IFRS 1 allows one of the following amounts to be used to establish a cost for
IFRS in the separate opening IFRS financial statements:
deemed cost:
fair value (determined in accordance with IAS 39) at the date of transition;
or
estimates;
hedge accounting;
non-controlling interests;
government loans
885
Estimates
An entity must not apply hindsight to estimates at the date of transition (unless
there is evidence that they were wrong)
The statement of financial position at the date of transition and restated
comparatives must be constructed using estimates current as at those dates
Estimates might include:
market values;
exchange rates;
interest rates;
Example: Estimates
A company is preparing its first IFRS financial statements for the year ending 31
December 2015.
The company operates in a regime that requires a single period of comparative
information. This means that its date of transition is 1 January 2014.
The company had recognised a warranty provision in its previous GAAP financial
statements for the year ended 31 December 2013.
This provision was based on an expectation that 5% of products would be
returned.
During 2014 and 2015 7% of products were returned.
The opening IFRS statement of financial position includes a provision recognised
and measured in accordance with IAS 37. This provision is based on estimated
returns of 5% as this was the estimate current at that date.
The company is not allowed to base the measurement of the provision on 7%
returns.
Derecognition
If an asset was derecognised under previous GAAP but would not have been
under IFRS, full retrospective application would bring it back onto the statement
of financial position. This is not allowed by IFRS 1.
The IAS 39/IFRS 9 derecognition rules must be applied prospectively for
transactions occurring on or after the date of transition to IFRSs.
an entity may apply the rules retrospectively from any date of its choosing
but only if the information needed to apply IAS 39 was obtained at the date
of the transaction.
Note that some financial assets that were derecognised before the date of
transition might still be brought back onto the opening IFRS statement of financial
position due to the rules requiring consolidation of special purpose vehicles. If a
financial asset had been derecognised in a sale or transfer to an entity which
Emile Woolf International
886
hedge accounting can only be used if the hedge qualifies under rules in
IFRS.
Non-controlling interests
IFRS 10 contains rules:
887
Current year (the date to which the first IFRS financial statements are
prepared);
Last year (the comparatives to the first IFRS financial statements which
were originally published under the previous GAAP);
financial position;
cash flows.
888
a reconciliation of the profit or loss for the latest period presented under
previous GAAP
Illustration: Reconciliations
889
IFRS
adjustments
Rs.
IFRSs
Rs.
2,000
400
300
(50)
2,300
350
2,400
250
2,650
1,200
800
50
0
(70)
0
1,200
730
50
2,050
(70)
1,980
Total assets
4,450
180
4,630
800
415
30
25
0
0
0
220
800
415
30
245
Total liabilities
1,270
220
1,490
3,180
(40)
3,140
Issued capital
Revaluation reserve
Retained earnings (balance)
1,000
0
2,180
0
190
(230)
1,000
190
1,950
Total equity
3,180
(40)
3,140
Loans
Trade payables
Current tax liability
Deferred tax liability
890
CHAPTER
32
Contents
1 IFRS for small and medium sized entities (SMEs)
2 IFRS 4: Insurance contracts
3 Insurance companies
4 Banks
5 Mutual funds
6 IAS 26: Retirement benefit plans
891
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 4
C2
Banks
C3
Mutual funds
C4
Insurance companies
C5
892
Introduction
1.1 Introduction
International accounting standards are written to meet the needs of investors in
international capital markets. Most companies adopting IFRSs are large listed
entities. The IASB has not stated that IFRSs are only aimed at quoted
companies, but certainly the majority of adopters are large entities. In many
countries IFRSs are used as national GAAP which means that unquoted small
and medium-sized entities (SMEs) have to apply them.
There is an argument that all entities should apply the same accounting
standards in order to give a fair presentation of the affairs of the entity. However
in some cases, many of the IFRSs are complex and can be difficult for SMEs to
apply, particularly in areas such as financial instruments. Additionally, not all the
information required by IFRSs for disclosure is needed by the users of the SMEs
financial statements.
Some commentators therefore suggest that SMEs and public entities should be
allowed to use simplified or differing standards as the nature of their business is
different from large quoted entities.
The users of financial statements of SMEs are different from the users of the
financial statements of quoted companies. The only user groups that use the
financial statements of an SME are normally:
its shareholders/owners;
lenders;
893
Some IFRSs deal with subjects that are of little or no relevance to SMEs,
such as accounting standards on consolidation, associates, joint ventures,
deferred tax, construction contracts and standards that deal with complex
issues of fair value measurement.
The costs of complying with IFRSs can be high. Large companies are able
to bear the cost, which might not be significant relative to their size. For
SMEs, the cost is proportionately much higher, and it is doubtful whether
the benefits of complying with IFRSs would justify the costs.
There are not many users of financial statements of SMEs, and they use
the financial statements for a smaller range of decisions, compared to
investors in international capital markets. So would it be a waste of time (as
well as cost) to comply with IFRSs?
It has also been argued that full statutory accounts for SMEs would be in
the public interest, and might help to protect other stakeholders in the
company (such as suppliers, customers, lenders and employees).
894
some topics in IFRSs being omitted because they are not relevant to typical
SMEs
The IFRS for SMEs does not address the following topics:
special accounting for assets held for sale (i.e. there is no equivalent to
IFRS 5).
The omission of equivalent rules to those in IAS 33, IAS 34 and IFRS 8 is not
surprising as they are relevant to listed entities. As the next section explains,
such entities cannot be SMEs.
Stand-alone document
The IFRS for SMEs is a stand-alone document. This means that it contains all of
the rules to be followed by SMEs without referring to other IFRSs. For example it
sets out rules for property, plant and equipment without specifying that the rules
are similar or dissimilar to those found in IAS 16.
In the following pages we provide an overview of the sections of the IFRS for
SMEs and often refer to similarity or difference to equivalent other IFRSs. This is
not what the IFRS for SMEs does but we adopt the approach to make it easier for
you to gain an understanding of the main features of the standard.
The IFRS for SMEs is derived from rules in other IFRS. You will note that it uses
the same terminology and that many of the rules are identical. However, in
several cases the rules in other IFRSs from which the IFRS for SMEs derives
have been changed whereas the equivalent rules in this standard have not been
changed. For example the rules on joint ventures are based on the standard (IAS
31) that preceded IFRS 11 which you covered earlier. You should not interpret
this as meaning that the standard is out of date. It simply means that there is a
difference between the rules for SMEs and those followed by other entities.
Changes to the main body of standards will not necessarily result in a revision to
the IFRS for SMEs.
895
b.
b.
The decision as to which entities are required or permitted to apply the standard
will lie with the regulatory and legislative authorities in each jurisdiction.
Section 2: Concepts and pervasive principles
This section is drawn from the IASB Framework for the preparation and
presentation of financial statements. This was the document that preceded the
IASB Conceptual Framework with which you are already familiar.
The section states that the objective of financial statements of a small or
medium-sized entity is to provide information about the financial position,
performance and cash flows of the entity that is useful for economic decisionmaking by a broad range of users who are not in a position to demand reports
tailored to meet their particular information needs. Financial statements also
show the results of the stewardship of management (the accountability of
management for the resources entrusted to it).
The section lists the following qualitative characteristics of information in financial
statements:
understandability;
relevance;
materiality;
reliability;
prudence;
completeness;
comparability; and
timeliness.
896
inventories are measured at the lower of cost and selling price less costs to
complete and sell; and
897
comparative information.
in a single statement; or
in two statements
An entity must present its total comprehensive income for a period either:
An income statement is what the IFRS for SMEs calls a statement of profit or
loss.
898
a statement of income and retained earnings (if the only changes in equity
in the period arise from profit or loss, dividends paid, corrections of errors
and changes in accounting policy).
899
financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value through profit
or loss) are measured at their fair value (which is usually the transaction
price) with transaction costs expensed to profit or loss;
Investments in shares must be measured at fair value with all gains and
losses recognised through profit or loss.
900
At the end of each reporting period, an entity must measure all financial
instruments within the scope of Section 12 at fair value and recognise changes in
fair value in profit or loss.
This section includes a simplified hedge accounting regime which can only be
used to account for hedges of the following risks:
cost model;
equity method; or
The IFRS for SMEs identifies three broad types of joint venture:
jointly-controlled operations
901
jointly-controlled assets
jointly-controlled entities.
the assets that it controls and the liabilities that it incurs, and
the expenses that it incurs and its share of the income that it earns from the
sale of goods or services by the joint venture.
its share of the jointly controlled assets, classified according to the nature of
the assets;
its share of any liabilities incurred jointly with the other venturers in relation
to the joint venture;
any income from the sale or use of its share of the output of the joint
venture, together with its share of any expenses incurred by the joint
venture; and
any expenses that it has incurred in respect of its interest in the joint
venture.
An entity with an interest in jointly-controlled entity must account for all of its
jointly-controlled entities using one of the following:
cost model;
equity method; or
All assets within the scope of this section must be measured subsequently
using the cost model. Revaluation is not allowed.
902
All assets within the scope of this section must be measured subsequently
using the cost model. Revaluation is not allowed.
All intangible assets must be amortised over their estimated useful lives. If this
cannot be estimated a useful life of 10 years is assumed. This means that there
is no requirement to test unamortised intangibles for impairment on an annual
basis.
Section 19: Business combinations and goodwill
The section 19 rules on accounting for business combinations and goodwill are
similar to the IFRS 3 rules. However, there are some differences.
Acquisition costs are capitalised under this standard whereas they must be
expensed under IFRS 3.
903
904
new guidance;
new exemptions;
minor clarifications.
905
Note that there were no changes proposed resulting from the issue of IFRS 10,
IFRS 11, IFRS 12, IFRS 13 and IFRS 9. This implies that the IASB are content
with the IFRS for SMEs in this area and see no need to align the rules in the light
of changes to the other standards.
One major change proposed is the alignment of section 29 on income tax with
IAS 12. The reason for the difference was explained in the previous section.
906
Background
Insurance risk
Objective of IFRS 4
2.1 Background
The group accounts of listed entities in the EU had to be prepared according to
IFRS for all accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2005. This
regulation applied to some very large insurance companies in the EU.
In the run up to conversion, the insurance industry identified a problem. IFRS
contained no rules on accounting for insurance contracts. IAS 8 specifies criteria
for an entity to use in developing an accounting policy if no IFRS applies
specifically to an item. The industry believed that this would lead to difficulties
and divergent accounting across the industry.
The IASB launched the insurance contract project, intending that this would be
completed in two phases.
Phase 1 was intended as a temporary solution to the problem faced by insurers
and this resulted in the publication of IFRS 4 in 2004. Phase 2 was expected to
be completed in 2005/6 but this has not happened yet. The project team has
been working assiduously on this for many years. Their failure to complete the
project to date is a reflection on how complex insurance issues can be and also
the need for US GAAP and IFRS to converge in this area.
907
Definition
Reinsurance contract: An insurance contract issued by one insurer (the reinsurer)
to compensate another insurer (the cedant) for losses on one or more contracts
issued by the cedant.
However, IFRS 4 does not exempt insurers from certain implications of the IAS 8
criteria. Specifically, an insurer:
must not:
x
must:
x
908
Prudence
An insurer need not change accounting policies for insurance contracts to
eliminate excessive prudence.
If an insurer already measures its insurance contracts with sufficient prudence, it
must not introduce additional prudence.
909
INSURANCE COMPANIES
Section overview
a statement of cash flows for each statutory fund operated by the life
insurer and the shareholders fund;
a revenue account for each statutory fund operated by the life insurer;
a statement of premiums;
a statement of claims;
a statement of expenses;
910
Summary
All insurance companies operating in Pakistan must prepare their accounts in
accordance with the following:
Health
Motor
Rs. m
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
Expenses
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
Net commission
Underwriting result
Investment income
Other income
(X)
X
Taxation
(X)
X
X
911
X
X
X
X
Underwriting provisions
Provision for outstanding claims
Provision for unearned premium
Commision income unearned
Total underwriting provisons
Deferred liabilites
Staff retirement benefit
Creditors and accruals
Premium received in advance
Amounts due to other insurers/reinsurers
Accrued expenses
Other creditors and accruals
X
X
X
X
X
Other liabilities
X
X
X
X
X
X
ASSETS
Cash and bank balances
Investments
Other assets
Premiums due but unpaid
Amounts due from other insurers/reinsurers
Accrued investment income
Reinsurance recoveries against outstanding claims
Deferred commission expense
Prepayments
Sundry receivables
Fixed assets (non--current assets)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
912
913
Statement of expenses
Illustration: Statement of expenses
914
Statement of claims
Illustration: Statement of claims
915
BANKS
Section overview
This is the case whether the bank is incorporated in Pakistan or outside Pakistan
and whether it listed or no.
BSD circular No. 36
BSD circular No. 36 contains formats that must be used when preparing financial
statements. The formats for the statement of financial performance (profit and
loss account) and statement of financial position (balance sheet) are shown in
the following sections.
916
MARK-UP/INTEREST INCOME
Mark-up/return/interest earned
Mark-up/return/interest expensed
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
(X)
Dividend income
Income from dealing in foreign currencies
X
X
X
X
Other charges
(X)
X
X
(X)
X
X
917
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
LIABILITIES
Bills payable
Borrowings
Deposits and other accounts
Sub-ordinated loans
Liabilities against assets subject to finance lease
Deferred tax liabilities
Other liabilities
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
NET ASSETS
REPRESENTED BY
Share capital/ Head office capital account
Reserves
Unappropriated/ Unremitted profit
X
X
X
X
X
X
non-performing advances;
918
Other assets
especially
mentioned
Sub-standard
Doubtful
Loss
Amount outstanding
Domestic
Overseas
Total
Domestic
Overseas
Total
Rs. m
Rs. m
Rs. m
Rs. m
Rs. m
Rs. m
50
200
335
400
10
15
30
400
985
455
50
200
300
400
950
35
35
10
15
35
400
5
5
460
Provision
ns against non-p
performing advances
Opening balance
Charge for the year
Amounts written off
Reversals
Closing balance
Specific
General
Total
Rs. m
Rs. m
Rs. m
400
150
(20)
(70)
460
100
20
500
170
(20)
(70)
580
120
Rs. m
local currency
foreign currencies
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
919
Rs. m
current accounts
deposit accounts
X
X
Outside Pakistan
current accounts
deposit accounts
X
X
X
Investments
Disclosures must show investments by type (meaning how they are classified in
the financial statements) and by segment (meaning the market segment that has
been invested in.
The balances on both should agree.
Illustration: Investments
Investments by type
Available--for--sale securities
Rs. m
X
X
X
X
(X)
Total investments
Investments by segment
Federal government securities
Rs. m
X
X
920
Unlisted companies
X
X
X
(X)
Total investments
Customers
Rs. m
Fixed deposits
Savings deposits
Current accounts non-remunerative
X
X
Margin deposits
X
Financial institutions
Remunerative deposits
Non-remunerative deposits
X
X
X
Particulars of deposits
In local currencies
In foreign currencies
X
X
921
MUTUAL FUNDS
Section overview
Accounting issues
=
Total number of units outstanding
Open-ended mutual funds (also called unit trusts) are funds which
continually issue or redeem new units on demand.
922
Rs. m
X
X
Other income
X
X
EXPENSES
Remuneration to management
X
X
(X)
923
X
X
X
X
X
LIABILITIES
Payable to investment advisor
Others
X
X
X
X
ASSETS
Cash and bank balances
Investments
Others
NET ASSETS
X
X
X
X
924
Rs. m
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
(B)
A+B
X
X
Final distribution
-
cash distribution
X
X
925
Scope
Definitions
Disclosure
Other statements
6.1 Scope
IAS 26 complements IAS 19, Employee Benefits which is concerned with the
determination of the cost of retirement benefits in the financial statements of
employers.
IAS 26 applies to the reports of retirement benefit plans whether they are:
regardless of:
x whether a fund has a separate legal identity; or
x whether there are trustees.
All other IFRS apply to the reports of retirement benefit plans to the extent that
they are not superseded by IAS 26.
Insured benefits
Retirement benefit plans with assets invested with insurance companies are
within the scope of IAS 26 unless the contract with the insurance company is in
the name of a specified participant or a group of participants and the retirement
benefit obligation is solely the responsibility of the insurance company.
Outside scope
IAS 26 does not deal with other forms of employment benefits such as
employment termination indemnities, deferred compensation arrangements, longservice leave benefits, special early retirement or redundancy plans, health and
welfare plans or bonus plans.
Government social security type arrangements are also excluded from the scope
of IAS 26.
926
6.2 Definitions
Definition
Retirement benefit plans are arrangements whereby an entity provides benefits
for its employees on or after termination of service (either in the form of an
annual income or as a lump sum) when such benefits, or the employer's
contributions towards them, can be determined or estimated in advance of
retirement from the provisions of a document or from the entity's practices.
A retirement benefit plan is a reporting entity separate from the employers of the
participants in the plan.
Retirement benefit plans are known by a variety of names, for example, pension
schemes, superannuation schemes; or retirement benefit schemes'
Definitions
Defined contribution plans are retirement benefit plans under which amounts to
be paid as retirement benefits are determined by contributions to a fund together
with investment earnings thereon.
Defined benefit plans are retirement benefit plans under which amounts to be
paid as retirement benefits are determined by reference to a formula usually
based on employees' earnings and/or years of service.
Funding is the transfer of assets to an entity (the fund) separate from the
employer's entity to meet future obligations for the payment of retirement
benefits.
Participants are the members of a retirement benefit plan and others who are
entitled to benefits under the plan.
Net assets available for benefits are the assets of a plan less liabilities other than
the actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits.
Actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits is the present value of
the expected payments by a retirement benefit plan to existing and past
employees, attributable to the service already rendered.
Vested benefits are benefits, the rights to which, under the conditions of a
retirement benefit plan, are not conditional on continued employment.
927
benefits; and
x knowing whether contributions have been received and proper control
a description of significant activities for the period and the effect of any
changes relating to the plan, and its membership and terms and conditions;
Requirement
The report of a defined contribution plan must contain:
a description of significant activities for the period and the effect of any
changes relating to the plan, and its membership and terms and conditions;
928
Requirement
The report must contain either:
If an actuarial valuation has not been prepared at the date of the report, the most
recent valuation is used as a base and the date of the valuation disclosed.
Actuarial Present Value of Promised Retirement Benefits
The actuarial present value of promised retirement benefits is based on the
benefits promised under the terms of the plan on service rendered to date using
either:
6.6 Disclosure
Specific requirement
The report of a retirement benefit plan (defined benefit or defined contribution)
must contain the following information:
a description of the plan and the effect of any changes in the plan during
the period.
929
Guidance
Reports provided by retirement benefit plans include the following, if applicable:
benefits;
investments; and
x transfers from and to other plans;
930
changes in any of the above during the period covered by the report.
It is not uncommon to refer to other documents that are readily available to users
and in which the plan is described, and to include only information on subsequent
changes in the report.
X
X
X
(X)
Net assets
Represented by:
Members account
931
X
X
Less:
Permanent withdrawals
X
(X)
X
X
932
CHAPTER
33
933
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
A 12
A 13
IPSAS Financial reporting under the cash basis of accounting (this IPSAS has
not been given any number).
934
Scope of IPSAS
Authority of IPSAS
935
Due process
The IPSASB issues exposure drafts of all proposed IPSAS and RPGs for public
comment. In some cases, the IPSASB may also issue a Consultation Paper prior
to the development of an exposure draft.
This provides an opportunity for those affected by IPSASB pronouncements to
provide input and present their views before the pronouncements are finalised
and approved.
In developing its pronouncements, the IPSASB seeks input from its consultative
group and considers and makes use of pronouncements issued by:
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) to the extent they are
applicable to the public sector;
The IPSASB works to ensure that its pronouncements are consistent with those
of IASB to the extent those pronouncements are applicable and appropriate to
the public sector.
b)
c)
sells goods and services, in the normal course of its business, to other
entities at a profit or full cost recovery;
d)
e)
GBEs exist for a profit motive so should apply IFRS rather than IPSAS.
936
The IPSASB issues IPSAS dealing with financial reporting under the cash basis
of accounting and the accrual basis of accounting. The IPSASB has also issued
a comprehensive Cash Basis IPSAS that includes mandatory and encouraged
disclosures sections. This is covered in a later section.
Accruals based IPSAS
The IPSASB has published many accrual based IPSAS that are based very
closely on the equivalent IFRS. The IPSASB attempts, wherever possible, to
maintain the accounting treatment and original text of the IFRSs unless there is a
significant public sector issue which warrants a departure.
The IPSASB has also published accrual based IPSAS that deal with public sector
financial reporting issues that are not addressed by IFRS.
The following table lists the accruals based IPSAS.
IPSAS
IFRS equivalent
IAS 1
IAS 7
IAS 8
IAS 21
IAS 23
IAS 27
IFRS 28
IAS 31 (now
superseded)
IAS 18
IAS 29
IAS 11
IAS 2
IAS 17
IAS 10
IAS 32
IAS 40
IAS 16
IFRS 8
IAS 37
IAS 24
None
None
None
937
IPSAS
IFRS equivalent
None
IAS 19
IAS 36
IAS 41
IAS 32
IAS 39
IFRS 7
IAS 38
SIC 12
none
IAS 27 (revised)
IFRS 10
IAS 28 (revised)
IFRS 11
IFRS 12
Commonwealth Secretariat;
Council of Europe;
EC (European Commission);
938
Introduction
2.1 Introduction
A conceptual framework is a system of concepts and principles that underpin the
preparation of financial statements. These concepts and principles should be
consistent with one another.
The IPSASB have published a conceptual framework called The conceptual
framework for general purpose financial reporting (GPFRs) by public sector
entities.
This deals with concepts that apply to general purpose financial reporting
(financial reporting) under the accrual basis of accounting.
This is made up of the following chapters:
939
the performance of the entity during the reporting period in, for example:
x
940
relevance;
faithful representation;
understandability;
timeliness;
comparability; and
verifiability.
Definition
An asset
A liability
Revenue
Expense
Ownership
contributions
Ownership
distributions
941
It is not possible to identify a single measurement basis that meets the above
requirements:
Any of the following bases might be used depending on circumstance:
historical cost;
market value;
replacement cost;
value in use.
942
General requirements
a comparison of budget and accrual amounts when the entity makes its
approved budget publicly available; and
Comparative information must be disclosed for all amounts unless IPSAS permits
or requires otherwise.
Overall consideration
The standard describes the following overall considerations when presenting
financial statements:
going concern;
consistency of presentation;
offset.
943
revenue;
finance costs;
share of the surplus or deficit of associates and joint ventures accounted for
using the equity method;
944
Each item of revenue and expense for the period that is recognised directly
in net assets/equity, and the total of these items;
The total revenue and expense for the period (calculated as the sum of the
above);
The following must be disclosed either on the face of the statement of changes in
net assets/equity or in the notes:
Notes
The requirements are very similar to those set out in IAS 1 and are not repeated
here.
945
Introduction
Financial statements
Budget comparison
4.1 Introduction
The cash basis of accounting recognises transactions and events only when
cash (including cash equivalents) is received or paid by the entity.
Objective
This standard prescribes the manner in which general purpose financial
statements should be presented under the cash basis of accounting.
The standard is comprised of two parts:
Part 1 is mandatory and sets out the requirements which are applicable to
all entities preparing general purpose financial statements under the cash
basis of accounting.
Scope
An entity which prepares and presents financial statements under the cash basis
of accounting should apply the requirements of part 1 of the standard.
Compliance with part 1 of the standard should be disclosed.
The rules apply both to financial statements of an individual entity and to
consolidated financial statements.
The standard does not apply to government business enterprises.
946
Total cash receipts and total cash payments should be reported on a gross basis.
However, they may be reported on a net basis when:
they are for items in which the turnover is quick, the amounts are large, and
the maturities are short.
947
the domicile and legal form of the entity, and the jurisdiction within which it
operates;
the name of the controlling entity and the ultimate controlling entity of the
economic entity (where applicable, if any).
The financial statements should be clearly identified and distinguished from other
information in the same published document.
Foreign currency
Cash receipts and payments arising from transactions in a foreign currency
should be recorded using the exchange rate at the date of the receipts and
payments.
Cash balances held in a foreign currency should be reported using the closing
rate.
948
CHAPTER
34
949
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 1
950
Introduction
Scope
IAS 29 requirements
1.1 Introduction
Primary financial statements are normally prepared on the historical cost basis
without taking into account:
changes in specific prices of assets held (except to the extent that property,
plant and equipment and investments may be revalued).
the general population regards monetary amounts not in terms of the local
currency but in terms of a relatively stable foreign currency. Prices may be
quoted in that currency;
sales and purchases on credit take place at prices that compensate for the
expected loss of purchasing power during the credit period, even if the
period is short;
interest rates, wages and prices are linked to a price index; and
951
1.2 Scope
IAS 29 must be applied to the primary financial statements (including the
consolidated financial statements) of any entity whose functional currency is the
currency of a hyperinflationary economy.
IAS 29 applies from the beginning of the reporting period in which an entity
identifies the existence of hyperinflation in the country in whose currency it
reports.
952
Equity balances
investments;
goodwill; and
Inventories of partly-finished and finished goods are restated from the dates on
which the costs of purchase and of conversion were incurred.
953
Restated retained earnings are derived from all the other amounts in the
restated statement of financial position.
At the end of the first period and in subsequent periods, all components of
owners' equity are restated by applying a general price index from the beginning
of the period (or the date of contribution, if later).
Practical problems
If detailed records of the date and cost of acquisition of property, plant and
equipment are not available, then an independent professional assessment can
be made of the items value in the first period of restatement.
If a general price index is not available for the whole period (or periods) required
then an estimated index can be used. This could be based on, say, movements
in the exchange rate between the local currency and a relatively stable foreign
currency.
954
make a gain if it holds net monetary liabilities because the burden of the
liabilities is reduced by inflation.
This gain or loss on the net monetary position may be derived as the difference
resulting from the restatement of non-monetary assets, owners' equity and
statement of profit or loss items and the adjustment of index linked assets and
liabilities.
The gain or loss may be estimated by applying the change in a general price
index to the weighted average for the period of the difference between monetary
assets and monetary liabilities.
955
956
OTHER ISSUES
Section overview
Disclosures
957
4.5 Disclosures
An entity must disclose the following:
the fact that the financial statements and the corresponding figures for
previous periods have been restated for the changes in the general
purchasing power of the functional currency and, as a result, are stated in
terms of the measuring unit current at the statement of financial position
date;
the identity and level of the price index at the statement of financial position
date and the movement in the index during the current and the previous
reporting period.
958
Example: Restatement
Extracts of X Limiteds IFRS statement of financial position at 31 December 2015
(before restatement) are as follows:
Non-current assets
2015
Rs. m
2014
Rs. m
300
400
All non-current assets were bought in 2013 (i.e. before that start of the
comparative period).
X Limited identified that its functional currency was hyperinflationary in
2015.
X Limited has identified the following price indices and constructed the
following conversion factors:
Price indices
2015
223
2013
95
= 223/95 =2.347
959
2014
Rs. m
Rs. m
704
939
Non-current assets
300 u 2.347 and 400 u 2.347
Non-current assets
Deferred tax liability
2015
2014
Rs. m
Rs. m
300
400
30
20
All non-current assets were bought in 2013 (i.e. before that start of the
comparative period).
The deferred tax liability was calculated as follows
2015
2014
Rs. m
Rs. m
Non-current assets
300
400
Tax base
200
333
Temporary difference
100
67
Tax rate
30%
30%
Deferred taxation
30
20
223
2014
135
2013
95
960
= 223/95 =2.347
= 223/135 = 1.652
Used to restate the deferred tax balance that would have been measured
in 2014 if restated financial statements had been prepared into 2015
prices.
2014 conversion factor (3)
(2013 prices to 2014 prices)
= 135/95 =1.421
2014
Rs. m
Rs. m
704
939
Non-current assets
300 u 2.347 and 400 u 2.347
704
Tax base
200
Temporary difference
504
Tax rate
30%
Deferred taxation
151
568
Tax base
333
Temporary difference
235
961
Tax rate
30%
Deferred taxation
71
u 1.652
Tax at 30%
117
2014
Rs. m
Rs. m
704
939
Non-current assets
300 u 2.347 and 400 u 2.347
962
CHAPTER
35
963
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 4
964
IFAS 1: Murabaha
IFAS 2: Ijarah
The intention is to avoid injustice, asymmetric risk and moral hazard (where the
party who causes a problem does not suffer its consequences) and unfair
enrichment at the expense of another party.
Permitted activities
Islamic banks are allowed to obtain their earnings through profit-sharing
investments or fee-based returns. If a loan is given for business purposes the
lender should take part in the risk. This usually involves the lender buying the
asset and then allowing a customer to use the asset for a fee.
Specific guidance
The following activities are prohibited:
965
Entering into contracts where there is uncertainty about the subject matter
and terms of contracts (This includes a prohibition on short selling, i.e.
selling something is not yet owned).
966
Murabaha
In traditional western finance a customer would borrow money from a bank in
order to finance activity, say the purchase of an asset. However, under Sharia the
bank cannot charge interest.
Murabaha is a form of trade credit for asset acquisition that avoids the payment
of interest. The bank buys the asset and then sells it on to the customer on a
deferred basis at a price that includes an agreed mark-up for profit. Payment can
be made by instalments but the mark-up is fixed in advance and cannot be
increased, even if there is a delay in payment.
Definition
Murabaha: Murabaha is a particular kind of sale where seller expressly mentions
the cost he has incurred on the commodities to be sold and sells it to another
person by adding some profit or mark-up thereon which is known to the buyer.
Thus, murabaha is a cost plus transaction where the seller expressly mentions
the cost of a commodity sold and sells it to another person by adding mutually
agreed profit thereon which can be either in lump-sum or through an agreed ratio
of profit to be charged over the cost.
Compliance with Sharia
A loan transaction is not made Shariah compliant by simply changing the term
interest in a contract to profit or mark-up. A murabaha transaction must satisfy
basic conditions as laid down in Shariah.
A Murabaha transaction is not valid under Shariah unless the subject of the
transaction is:
in existence; and
The sale must be prompt and absolute. Thus a sale attributed to a future
date or a sale contingent on a future event is void.
A sale in which the parties agree that the payment of price is deferred is
called a Bai'mu'ajjal.
The due time of payment can be fixed either with reference to a particular
date, or by specifying a period of time, but it cannot be fixed with reference
967
If a particular period (e.g. one month) is fixed for payment, the period is
deemed to start at the date of delivery unless the parties have agreed
otherwise.
A deferred price may be more than the cash price, but it must be fixed at
the time of sale.
The client and the bank sign an agreement under which the bank promises
to sell and the client promises to buy commodity up to a maximum amount
of purchases at an agreed profit margin.
The bank appoints the client as his agent for purchasing the commodity on
its behalf.
The client purchases the commodity on behalf of the bank and takes its
possession as an agent of the bank.
The client informs the bank that the commodity has been purchased for the
bank and is in the clients possession. (The client is an agent of the bank
thus the bank has constructive possession of the commodity).
The client (at the same time) makes an offer to purchase the commodity
from the bank at the agreed profit margin referred to above.
The bank accepts the offer and raises an invoice for the sale. Ownership as
well as the risk of the commodity is transferred to the client.
968
lease agreements to explore for or use minerals, oil, natural gas and similar
non-regenerative resources;
In Ijara/leasing, the asset that is the subject of the lease remains in the
ownership of the lessor and only its usufruct is transferred to the lessee.
Only owned assets can be leased out except that a lessee can effect a sublease with the express permission of the lessor.
Any asset that cannot be used without being consumed cannot be a leased
asset (e.g money, edibles, fuel, etc.).
Lease rentals do not become due and payable until the assets to be leased
are delivered to the lessee.
The lessor must retain title to the asset and bear all risks and rewards
pertaining to ownership during the entire term of the lease. However, the
lessee is responsible for any damage or loss caused to the leased asset
due to the fault or negligence of the lessee or from non-customary use of
the asset and is also responsible for all risks and consequences in relation
to third party liability, arising from or incidental to operation or use of the
leased assets.
The insurance of the leased asset should be in the name of lessor and the
cost of such insurance borne by him.
969
A lease can be terminated before expiry of the term of the lease but only
with the mutual consent of the parties.
Either party can make a unilateral promise to buy/sell the assets upon
expiry of the term of lease, or earlier at a price and at such terms and
conditions as are agreed. However, the lease agreement cannot be
conditional upon such a sale nor can the lease agreement contain a term
agreeing to transfer of ownership at a future date.
Definitions
Ijarah is a form of lease finance agreement where a bank buys an asset for a
customer and then leases it to the customer over a specific period for agreed
rentals which allow the bank to recover the capital cost of the asset and a profit
margin.
Definition: Ijarah (Lease)
Ijarah is a contract whereby the owner of an asset, other than consumables,
transfers its usufruct to another person for an agreed period for an agreed
consideration.
Usufruct: The right to use an asset.
The term ijarah also includes a contract of sublease executed by the lessee with
the express permission of the lessor (being the owner).
Whether a transaction is an ijarah or not depends on its substance rather than
the form of the contract provided it complies with the Shariah essentials (as
shown above).
An ijarah is an agreement that is cancellable only:
with the mutual consent of the mujir (lessor) and the mustajir (lessee); or
If the mustajir (lessee) enters into a new ijarah for the same or an
equivalent asset with the same mujir (lessor).
Definitions
Inception of the ijarah: The date the leased asset is put into mustajirs (lessees)
possession pursuant to an ijarah contract.
The term of the ijarah: The period for which the mustajir (lessee) has contracted
to lease the asset together with any further terms for which the mustajir (lessee)
has the option to continue to lease the asset, with or without further payment,
which option at the inception of the ijarah it is reasonably certain that the
mustajir (lessee) will exercise.
970
Ujrah (lease) payments: Payments over the ijarah term that the mustajir is,
contractually required to pay.
Economic life: Either the period over which an asset is expected to be
economically usable by one or more users or the number of production or similar
units expected to be obtained from the asset by one or more users.
Useful life: The estimated period, from the beginning of the ijarah term, without
limitation by the ijarah term, over which the economic benefits embodied in the
asset are expected to be consumed by the enterprise.
Ijarah in the financial statements of mustajir (lessees)
Assets acquired for ijarah are recognised upon acquisition at historical cost which
is the net purchasing price plus all expenditures necessary to bring the asset to
its intended use, such as custom duties, taxes, freight, insurance, installation,
testing, etc.
Ujrah payments under an ijarah should be recognised as an expense in the
statement of profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the ijarah term unless
another systematic basis is representative of the time pattern of the users
benefit.
Ujrah payments are recognised as an expense in the statement of profit or loss
on a straight- line basis unless another systematic basis is representative of the
time pattern of the users benefit, even if the payments are not on that basis.
Mustajir (Lessees) should make the following disclosures for ijarah, in addition to
meeting the IFRS disclosure requirements in respect of financial instruments:
the total of future ujrah payments under ijarah, for each of the following
periods:
x
later than one year and not later than five years;
the total of future sub-ijarah payments expected to be received under subijarah at the reporting date;
ijarah and sub-ijarah payments recognised in income for the period, with
separate amounts for ijarah payments and sub-ijarah payments;
971
representative of the time pattern in which benefit of use derived from the leased
asset is diminished.
Costs, including depreciation, incurred in earning the ijarah income are
recognised as an expense.
Ijarah income is recognised in income on accrual basis as and when the rental
becomes due, unless another systematic basis is more representative of the time
pattern in which use benefit derived from the leased asset is diminished.
Initial direct costs incurred specifically to earn revenues from an ijarah are either
deferred and allocated to income over the ijarah term in proportion to the
recognition of ujrah, or are recognised as an expense in the statement of profit or
loss in the period in which they are incurred.
Assets leased out should be depreciated over the period of lease term using
depreciation methods set out in lAS 16 However, in the event of an asset
expected to be available for re-ijarah after its first term, depreciation should be
charged over the economic life of such asset on the basis set out in IAS 16.
Mujir (Lessors) should make the following disclosures for ijarah, in addition to
meeting the IFRS disclosure requirements in respect of financial instruments:
the future ijarah payments in the aggregate and for each of the following
periods:
x
later than one year and not later than five years;
In addition, the requirements on disclosure under IAS 16: Property, plant and
equipment, IAS 36: Impairment of assets, IAS 38: Intangible assets and IAS 40:
Investment property, apply to assets leased out under ijarah.
Sale and leaseback transactions
A sale and leaseback transaction involves the sale of an asset by the vendor and
the leasing of the same asset back to the vendor.
When an asset is sold with an intention to enter into an ijarah arrangement, any
profit or loss based on the assets fair value should be recognised immediately.
If the sale price is below fair value, any profit or loss should be recognised
immediately except that, if the loss is compensated by future lease payments at
below market price, it should be deferred and amortised in proportion to the lease
payments over the period for which the asset is expected to be used.
If the sale price is above fair value, the excess over fair value should be deferred
and amortised over the period for which the asset is expected to be used.
972
the disclosure of bases for profit allocation between owners' equity and that
of unrestricted funds.
973
Definitions
Definition
Unrestricted investment accounts / PLS deposit accounts (unrestricted funds)
Accounts where the investment account holder authorises the IIFS to invest the
account holders funds on the basis of Mudaraba or Musharaka contract in a
manner which the IIFS deems appropriate without laying down any restrictions as
to where, how and for what purpose the funds should be invested.
The IIFS might also use other funds which it has the right to use with the
permission of Investment account holders.
The investment account holder authorises the IIFS to invest the account holders
funds on the basis of mudaraba or musharaka contract as IIFS deems
appropriate without laying down any restrictions as to where, how and for what
purpose the funds should be invested.
The IIFS can commingle the investment account holders funds with its own
equity or with other funds that it has the right to use with the permission of
Investment account holders.
Holders of investment accounts appoint IIFS to invest their funds on the basis of
an agency contract in return for a specified fee and perhaps a specified share of
the profit if the realised profit exceeds a certain level.
Profits (calculated after the IIFS has received its share of profits as a mudarib)
are allocated between investment account holders and the IIFS according to
relative amount of funds invested and a pre-agreed profit sharing formula.
Losses are allocated between the investment account holders and the IIFS based
on the relative amount of funds invested by each.
Accounting treatment in respect of unrestricted investment account holders / PLS
deposit account holders
Definition
Funds of unrestricted investment/PLS deposit account holders
The balance, at the reporting date, from the funds originally received by the IIFS
from the account holders plus (minus) their share in the profits (losses) and
decreased by withdrawals or transfers to other types of accounts.
Funds of the account holders are initially measured as the amount invested and
the subsequently measured as follows at each reporting date:
974
Illustration:
Balance of investment account at the beginning of the period
(X)
(X)
X/(X)
X
Profits of investments jointly financed by the investment account holders and the
IIFS are allocated between them according to the mutually agreed terms.
Profits which have been allocated but have not yet been repaid or reinvested
must be recognised and disclosed as a liability by the IIFS.
Any loss resulting from transactions in a jointly financed investment is accounted
as follows:
any remaining loss should be deducted from the respective equity shares in
the joint investment account holders and the IIFS according to each partys
investment for the period.
A loss due to negligence or similar on the part of the IIFS is deducted from its
share of the profits of the jointly financed investment. Any such loss in excess of
the IIFS's share of profits is deducted from its equity share in the joint investment.
Presentation and disclosure in financial statements
Funds of account holders must be accounted for as redeemable capital.
The financial statement must disclose the following in its note on significant
accounting policies:
the bases applied to allocate profits between owners' equity and the
account holders;
the bases applied by the IIFS for charging expenses to unrestricted account
holders;
the bases applied by the IIFS for charging provisions, such as provision for
non performing accounts, provisions on impairment etc and the parties to
whom they revert once they are no longer required.
The IIFS should disclose significant category of accounts and of the percentage
which the IIFS has agreed to invest in order to produce returns for them.
975
where the IIFS is unable to utilise all funds available for investment how the
investments made relates to the IIFS and investment account holders.
the bases and the aggregate amounts (if applicable) for determining
incentive profits which IIFS receives from the profits of unrestricted funds
and incentive profits which IIFS pays from its profits to investment account
holders;
976
CHAPTER
36
977
INTRODUCTION
Objective
To develop an in-depth understanding of, and the ability to apply the requirements of
international pronouncements, the Companies Ordinance, 1984, and other applicable
regulatory requirements in respect of financial reporting and the presentation of financial
statements.
Learning outcomes
LO 3
B (b) 2
978
Introduction
1.1 Introduction
Illustration: Quotation from the Revised Code of Ethics for Chartered Accountants
Chartered Accountants are expected to demonstrate the highest standards of
professional conduct and to take into consideration the public interest. Ethical
behaviour by Chartered Accountants plays a vital role in ensuring public trust in
financial reporting and business practices and upholding the reputation of the
accountancy profession.
The Code of Ethics helps members of the Institute meet these obligations by
providing them with ethical guidance. The Code applies to all members, students,
affiliates, employees of member firms and, where applicable, member firms, in
all of their professional and business activities, whether remunerated or
voluntary.
Meaning of ethics
Ethics can be difficult to define but it is principally concerned with human
character and conduct. Ethical behaviour is more than obeying laws, rules and
regulations. It is about doing the right thing. The accountancy profession is
committed to acting ethically and in the public interest.
Most people are honest and have integrity and will always try to behave in the
right way in a given set of circumstances. However, accountants might face
situations where it is not easy to see the most ethical course of action. One of the
main roles of the ICAP code is to provide guidance in these situations.
Professional accountants may find themselves in situations where values are in
conflict with one another due to responsibilities to employers, clients and the
public.
ICAP has a code of conduct which members and student members must follow.
The code provides guidance in situations where ethical issues arise.
979
the Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961 and result in making the code more
stringent than the original.
ICAPs has adopted the revised ICAP Code of Ethics to be effective from July 01,
2015.
Any violation of the provisions of the Code will fall under Part 4 of Schedule 1 of
the Chartered Accountants Ordinance, 1961.
If any conflict arises between the guidance in the Code and the content of CAO,
Chartered Accountants bye-laws, or any specific directive issued by the Council,
the provisions of CAO, Chartered Accountants bye-laws, and the specific
directive must prevail in that order respectively.
Illustration: Quotation from the Revised Code of Ethics for Chartered Accountants
A distinguishing mark of the accountancy profession is its acceptance of the
responsibility to act in the public interest. Therefore, a chartered accountants
responsibility is not exclusively to satisfy the needs of an individual client or
employer. In acting in the public interest, a chartered accountant must observe
and comply with this Code.
This chapter explains ethical issues surrounding the preparation of financial
statements and other financial information.
References to chartered accountants in the following pages should be taken to
include student members of ICAP.
980
Safeguards
integrity;
objectivity;
confidentiality; and
professional behaviour
Integrity
Members should be straightforward and honest in all professional and business
relationships. Integrity implies not just honesty but also fair dealing and
truthfulness.
A chartered accountant should not be associated with reports, returns,
communications or other information where they believe that the information:
Objectivity
Members should not allow bias, conflicts of interest or undue influence of others
to override their professional or business judgements.
A chartered accountant may be exposed to situations that may impair objectivity.
It is impracticable to define and prescribe all such situations.
Relationships that bias or unduly influence the professional judgment of the
chartered accountant should be avoided.
Professional competence and due care
Practising as a chartered accountant involves a commitment to learning over
ones entire working life.
Members have a duty to maintain their professional knowledge and skill at such a
level that a client or employer receives a competent service, based on current
981
self-interest;
self-review;
advocacy;
familiarity; and
intimidation.
982
Example:
Ibrahim is member of ICAP working as a unit accountant.
He is a member of a bonus scheme under which, staff receive a bonus of 10% of
their annual salary if profit for the year exceeds a trigger level.
Ibrahim has been reviewing working papers prepared to support this years
financial statements. He has found a logic error in a spreadsheet used as a
measurement tool for provisions.
Correction of this error would lead to an increase in provisions. This would decrease
profit below the trigger level for the bonus.
Analysis:
Ibrahim faces a self-interest threat which might distort his objectivity.
Self-review threats
Self-review threats occur when a previous judgement needs to be re-evaluated
by members responsible for that judgement. For example, where a member has
been involved in maintaining the accounting records of a client he may be
unwilling to find fault with the financial statements derived from those records.
Again, this would threaten the fundamental principle of objectivity.
Circumstances that may create self-review threats include, but are not limited to,
business decisions or data being subject to review and justification by the same
chartered accountant in business responsible for making those decisions or
preparing that data.
Advocacy threats
A chartered accountant in business may often need to promote an organisations
position by providing financial information to the point that the chartered
accountants objectivity is compromised. As long as information provided is
neither false nor misleading such actions would not create an advocacy threat.
983
Familiarity threats
Familiarity threats occur when, because of a close relationship, members
become too sympathetic to the interests of others. Examples of circumstances
that may create familiarity threats include:
Intimidation threats
Intimidation threats occur when a members conduct is influenced by fear or
threats (for example, when he encounters an aggressive and dominating
individual at a client or at his employer).
Examples of circumstances that may create intimidation threats include:
2.3 Safeguards
Safeguards are actions or other measures that may eliminate threats or reduce
them to an acceptable level.
When a chartered accountant identifies threats to compliance with the
fundamental principles chartered accountant must then determine whether or not
that they are at an acceptable level.
If they are not at an acceptable level, the chartered accountant must determine
whether appropriate safeguards are available that, if applied, would eliminate the
threats or reduce them to an acceptable level.
Safeguards fall into two broad categories:
984
relevant facts;
985
Introduction
3.1 Introduction
This is a large section of Code. The following explanations focus on those areas
that might form the basis of an ethical conflict in the context of financial reporting.
A chartered accountant in public practice must not knowingly act in a way that
conflicts with the fundamental principles.
A chartered accountant must not accept a new client if that would create threats
to compliance with the fundamental principles. Such threats might include:
conflicts of interest.
986
threaten compliance with the fundamental principles. For example, there may be
a threat to professional competence and due care in circumstances where the
second opinion is not based on the same set of facts that were made available to
the existing accountant or is based on inadequate evidence.
A possible safeguard in such a case might include seeking client permission to
contact the existing accountant, describing the limitations surrounding any
opinion in communications with the client and providing the existing accountant
with a copy of the opinion.
If the company seeking the opinion will not allow communication with the existing
accountant, it might not be appropriate to provide the opinion sought.
Conflicts of interest
A chartered accountant may be faced with a conflict of interest when performing
a professional service.
A conflict of interest creates a threat to objectivity and may create threats to the
other fundamental principles.
Examples of situations in which conflicts of interest may arise include:
Advising two clients at the same time who are competing to acquire the
same company where the advice might be relevant to the parties
competitive positions.
Larger firms will operate in a number of separate departments, each with its
own partners and members of staff. By dividing the work of the audit firm
into different functions, employees involved in audit work will not be the
same as those involved in providing, say, consultancy advice to the same
client.
987
the firm having policies and procedures such that an individual is prevented
from making any management decision on behalf of the client;
obtaining the clients approval for any changes to the financial statements.
988
ACCOUNTANTS IN BUSINESS
Section overview
Introduction
Potential conflicts
4.1 Introduction
Accountants in business are often responsible for the preparation of accounting
information.
Accountants in business need to ensure that they do not prepare financial
information in a way that is misleading or that does not show a true and fair view
of the entitys operations.
Accountants who are responsible for the preparation of financial information must
ensure that the information they prepare is technically correct, reports the
substance of the transaction and is adequately disclosed.
There is a danger of influence from senior managers to present figures that
inflate profit or assets or understate liabilities. This puts the accountant in a
difficult position. On one hand, they wish to prepare proper information and on
the other hand, there is a possibility they might lose their job if they do not comply
with their managers wishes.
In this case, ethics starts with the individual preparing the information. They have
a difficult decision to make; whether to keep quiet or take the matter further. If
they keep quiet, they will certainly be aware that they are not complying with the
ethics of the accounting body they belong to. If they speak out, they may be
bullied at work into changing the information or sacked.
financial statements;
989
990
regulators.
tax compliance;
legal compliance; or
The significance of threats must be evaluated and unless they are clearly
insignificant, safeguards should be considered and applied to eliminate them or
reduce them to an acceptable level.
Such safeguards may include:
Example:
Ibrahim is member of ICAP working as a unit accountant.
He is a member of a bonus scheme under which, staff receive a bonus of 10% of
their annual salary if profit for the year exceeds a trigger level.
Ibrahim has been reviewing working papers prepared to support this years
financial statements. He has found a logic error in a spreadsheet used as a
measurement tool for provisions.
Correction of this error would lead to an increase in provisions. This would decrease
profit below the trigger level for the bonus.
Analysis:
Ibrahim faces a self-interest threat which might distort his objectivity.
Ibrahim has a professional responsibility to ensure that financial information is
prepared and presented fairly, honestly and in accordance with relevant
professional standards. He has further obligations to ensure that financial
information is prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards and
that records maintained represent the facts accurately and completely in all
material respects.
Ibrahim must make the necessary adjustment even though it would lead to a loss
to himself.
991
Example:
Ali is a chartered accountant recruited on a short-term contract to assist the
finance director, Bashir (who is not a chartered accountant) in finalising the draft
financial statements.
The decision on whether to employ Ali on a permanent basis rests with Bashir.
Ali has been instructed to prepare information on leases to be included in the
financial statements. He has identified a number of large leases which are being
accounted for as operating leases even though the terms of the contract contain
clear indicators that the risks and benefits have passed to the company. Changing
the accounting treatment for the leases would have a material impact on asset
and liability figures.
Ali has explained this to Bashir. Bashir responded that Ali should ignore this
information as the company need to maintain a certain ratio between the assets
and liabilities in the statement of financial position.
Analysis
Ali faces a self-interest threat which might distort his objectivity.
The current accounting treatment is incorrect.
Ali has a professional responsibility to ensure that financial information is prepared
and presented fairly, honestly and in accordance with relevant professional
standards. He has further obligations to ensure that financial information is
prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards and that records
maintained represent the facts accurately and completely in all material respects.
Possible course of action
Ali must explain his professional obligations to Bashir in particular that he cannot
be party to the preparation and presentation of knowingly misleading information.
Ali should refuse to remain associated with information that is misleading.
If Bashir refuses to allow the necessary changes to the information Ali should
report the matter to the audit committee or the other directors.
As a last resort if the company refuses to change the information Ali should resign
from his post.
Ali may need to consider informing the appropriate authorities in line with the ICAP
guidance on confidentiality.
992
Example:
Etishad is a chartered accountant who works in a team that reports to Fahad, the
finance director of Kohat Holdings.
Fahad Is also a chartered accountant. He has a domineering personality.
Kohat Holdings revalues commercial properties as allowed by IAS 16. Valuation
information received last year showed that the fair value of the property portfolio
was 2% less than the carrying amount of the properties (with no single property
being more than 4% different). A downward revaluation was not recognised on the
grounds that the carrying amount was not materially different from the fair value.
This years valuation shows a continued decline in the fair value of the property
portfolio. It is now 5% less than the carrying amount of the properties with some
properties now being 15% below the carrying amount.
Etishad submitted workings to Fahad in which he had recognised the downward
revaluations in accordance with IAS 16.
Fahad has sent him an email in response in which he wrote Stop bothering me
with this rubbish. There is no need to write the properties down. The fair value of
the portfolio is only 5% different from its carrying amount. Restate the numbers
immediately.
Analysis
Etishad faces an intimidation threat which might distort his objectivity.
The current accounting treatment might be incorrect. The value of the properties as
a group is irrelevant in applying IAS 16s revalution model. IAS 16 allows the use of
a revalution model but requires that the carrying amount of a property should not
be materially different from its fair value. This applies to individual properties not
the whole class taken together.
(It could be that Fahad is correct because there is insufficient information to judge
materiality in this circumstance. However, a 15% discrepancy does sound
significant).
Etishad has a professional responsibility to ensure that financial information is
prepared and presented fairly, honestly and in accordance with relevant
professional standards. He has further obligations to ensure that financial
information is prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards and
that records maintained represent the facts accurately and completely in all
material respects.
993
Example continued
Possible course of action
Etishad should arrange a meeting with Fahad to try to explain Fahads
misapplication of the IAS 16 guidance and to try to persuade Fahad that a change
might be necessary.
Fahad should be reminded that he too is bound by the same guidance that applies
to Etishad. Indeed he has a greater responsibility as the more senior person to
show leadership in this area.
Etishad cannot be party to the preparation and presentation of knowingly
misleading information. He should explain that he cannot remain associated with
information that is misleading. If Fahad refuses to allow the necessary changes to
the information, Etishad should report the matter to the audit committee or the
other directors.
As a last resort if the company refuses to change the information, Etishad should
resign from his post.
Etishad may need to consider informing the appropriate authorities in line with the
ICAP guidance on confidentiality.
994
I
Index
a
About the IFRS for SMEs
Accounting
concepts
estimates
for revaluation
Acid test ratio
Acquisition of a subsidiary in
the statement of cash flows
Actuarial method
Adjusting events after the
reporting period
Agricultural activities
Agriculture
Amortised cost
Analysis of expenses
Assets
Associates and the group
statement of cash flows
Available-for-sale financial
assets
AVCO
Average
time for holding inventory
time to collect
time to pay suppliers
933
43
89
129,165
871
794
256,292
284
107
776,814
120,156, 899
487,559
860,899
860,899
786,824
77
860,898
860,898
444,445
56
37
Call option
460,438
Capital maintenance
46
Cash flow
hedge
431,469
statements
757,795
Cash operating cycle
830,868
Cash-generating units
205,241
Changes in accounting
estimates
90
Changes in accounting policies 84,947,909
Code of ethics
979,1017
Commencement of a lease
274
790
441
857,896
828,866
827,865
828,866
995
4
165
19
8
35
528,566
460,498
27
27
43
d
Days sales outstanding
Debt ratios
Decommissioning liabilities and
similar provisions
Defaults and breaches
Deferred
consideration
tax: business combinations
Defined
benefit pension plans
contribution pension plans
Depreciation
of a re-valued asset
Derecognition of financial
instruments
Development costs
Diluted EPS
options and warrants
Direct method
Discontinued operations
Disposal of a
foreign subsidiary
subsidiary in the statement
of cash flows
Dividends
cover
received from an associate
yield
784
623
617
715,753
125
327,334
319,357
553,591
555,593
318,356
839
111,126
110,125
212,577
856,894
830
499,537
791,830
147,183
93
865
834,872
347
471,509
590
562
330,368
329,367
161
172
491
218
876
833
633,772
265,682
762
794
78
876
791
876
36
895
203
819,861
590
29
473,511
832,870
44
996
Index
Elements of financial
statements
Embedded derivatives
Employee benefits
Employee share option
Enhancing qualitative
characteristics
EPS: convertible preference
shares and convertible
bonds
Equity
instrument
method
Errors
Estimates
Ethics and Conduct
Events after the reporting
period: IAS 10
Exchange
differences
of goods or services
rate differences (statement
of cash flows)
Expenses
37
461, 491
363
352,390
750
399,437
700,738
981,1019
308,346
400,438
35
830
38
479
9,636
93
89
1017
GAAP
27
Gain or loss on
disposal
139,175,205
translation
751
Gearing ratio
834,872
Going concern assumption
78
Government assistance
192,198
Government grants
156,192, 900
Grants related to
assets
156,158,192
income
192,193
Gross investment in the lease
280,300
Gross profit ratio
823,861
Guaranteed residual value
276
77
751
107
784
39
Fair
presentation
50
value hedge
430,468
value hierarchy
487,525
value model for investment
property
167,203
value through profit or loss 403,441,442
value
45,159,203,234
Faithful representation
35
Finance
income
302
lease accounting
301
Financial
433
asset
441,477
capital maintenance
46
instruments
435
liability
436,442
ratios
813,816,854,885
Financing activities
791
First-in, first-out method (FIFO)
857,895
Foreign
currency
738
Hedges
accounting
effectiveness
of a net investment in a
foreign operation
Hedging
with derivatives
Held to maturity investments
High-geared
Historical cost
Holding company
465
467
473,474
465
439
407,441
872
44
577, 666
i
IAS 1 and group accounts
IAS 1: Presentation of Financial
Statements
997
537,575
43,55
998
869,907
118
380
120
467,505
122
420,458
182
313,351
879,919
349,389
891,945
265, 720
864,902
458,508
629
868,906
105,138
106,139
931
1007
262
233
482
463
619
274
274
Index
Income
Indirect method
Initial direct costs of a lease
Institute of Chartered
Accountants in Pakistan
(ICAP)
Insurance contracts
Integrity
Interest
cover ratio
rate implicit in the lease
Interim financial reporting
and impairment
Internally-generated intangibles
International GAAP
Inventory turnover
Investing activities
Investment property
Investor ratios
Irredeemable non-cumulative
preference shares
Islamic finance
38
771
277
3
945
1019
Manufacturer/dealer leases
Market risk
Material
items
non-adjusting events
Materiality and aggregation
Measurement
of revenue
Minimum lease payments
Most advantageous market
Mudaraba
Multi-employer plans
Murabaha
Musharaka
835,873
277
62
244
230
50
866
791
199
875
498
1003
Net
investment in the lease
profit ratio
realisable value (NRV)
Non-adjusting events after the
reporting period
Non-controlling interests and
the group statement of
cash flows
Non-financial information
Non-monetary items
591
591
593
593
l
Leases
payments made in advance
term
Leaseback
Legal obligation
Lessor accounting
Lessee's incremental borrowing
rate of interest
Leverage
Liabilities
Liquidity ratios
Liquidity risk
Loans and receivables
Low-geared
56
78
43
40
105
279
482
966, 973
341
966
966, 973
j
Joint
arrangements
control
operation
venture
281
473
266
823
45, 858
78
749
844
953
237
261
256
284
296
266
Objectivity
Offsetting
Onerous contracts
Operating
leases
segments
Options
Ordinary share
Other comprehensive income
Over-estimate or underestimate of tax
241
834
38
832
473
403
834
999
981
43, 464
307
242
71
356
774
579
479
of financial instruments
Recoverable amount
Redeemable preference shares
Related
party
transactions
Relevance
Repayments
of government grants
on finance leases
Reportable segments
Restructuring
costs
Retirement benefit plans
Retrospective application
Return on
capital employed
shareholder capital
Revaluation
model
of property, plant and
equipment
Revenue recognition
and substance
from providing a service
Revenue
Reversal of an impairment loss
Rights issues of shares
p
Parent entity
Percentage
annual growth in sales
Physical capital maintenance
Post-employment benefits
Potential ordinary share
that are not dilutive
Pre- and post-acquisition profits
Preference shares: debt or
equity?
Present value
Presentation: taxation
Price earnings ratio
(P/E ratio)
Principal market
Profit/sales ratio
Proposed dividends
Purchase cost
Purchased goodwill and foreign
subsidiaries
Put option
539
825
47
329
775
799
582
459
44
527
773
773
482
823
78
855
715
400
q
Qualifying asset
Qualitative
characteristics of useful
financial information
disclosures
Quantitative
disclosures
thresholds (segments)
thresholds
Quick ratio
9
68
35
160
745
72
308
555
926
85
819
821
125
128
109
108
103
207
788
151
34
473
473
72
72
833
r
Ratio analysis
Realisable value
Receivables days
Recognition
criteria for intangible assets
402
198
403
814
44
827
40
178
1000
283
284
989
3
71
983
594
710
44
797, 798
795
162
Index
Verifiability
36
877
105
184
893
57
461
729
124
539
242
400
858
737
830
827
t
Tax
base
computation
reconciliation
Taxation of profits
Timeliness
Transactions in own equity
Transitional provisions
Translation
of transactions
stage
Treasury shares
True and fair view
Types of lessors
497, 505
495
529
495
36
464
85
703
713
464
50
238
u
Understandability
Unguaranteed residual value
Users and their information
needs
36
240
31, 816
v
Value in use
200
1001
1002
!!"#
!"$$
%&
"""'!!
()
!!"#
!"!
*
info@icap.org.pk
""
+
+
,
-
/
&0
12
34
3
5
!'!#
$"""!
%&
"""'!!
*
lahore@icap.org.pk
6
7"8'
9
:*;
%&
"""'!!
()
!"#
"
*
*; <=>
2>=/
$8$$
?
9**
,
&
7
>
2
A
**
; =
B==
&
(
=
(;
!'"#
C$"!C
()
!'"#
C$!!
*
A; <=>
2>=/
$
(
/
-
4
BDE
,
&
?
7
4/
4
3
9>
!"#
""""""
()
!"#
"'""
*
*<=>
2>=/
F
&
>
$
B
G*
3
%,
-
4
4
!"#
C"'C
()
!"#
C"'
*
=4<=>
2>=/
!"
!
(
7H4
1
B==>
*;
A
**
9
7>->
3
7H4>
!#
$!!"
*
2H4<=>
2>=/
#$$
*
1
/
6//
:1
=
3
6//
!"#
C"
*
sukkur@icap.org.pk
%&
1
F
3
IJ
J
!C"#
!C$$
*
KJ<=>
2>=/
1
F
%
1F%#
1 2
6
L
&4
,
9=
0
G**
*
*
*=<=>
2>=/
2016