Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd
Upload
83 views

Regression Analysis: Source SS DF MS F P-Value

A regression analysis was conducted to predict crimes using dropout rate, density, and urban population as predictor variables. The regression model was statistically significant and explained 65.6% of the variance in crimes. Dropout rate, density, and urban population were all significant predictors of crimes, with dropout rate and urban population positively correlated with crimes, and density negatively correlated. The regression output provides coefficients, standard errors, t-statistics, and confidence intervals for each predictor variable.

Uploaded by

Ken Adachi
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
83 views

Regression Analysis: Source SS DF MS F P-Value

A regression analysis was conducted to predict crimes using dropout rate, density, and urban population as predictor variables. The regression model was statistically significant and explained 65.6% of the variance in crimes. Dropout rate, density, and urban population were all significant predictors of crimes, with dropout rate and urban population positively correlated with crimes, and density negatively correlated. The regression output provides coefficients, standard errors, t-statistics, and confidence intervals for each predictor variable.

Uploaded by

Ken Adachi
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Regression Analysis

R² 0.656
Adjusted R² 0.633 n 50
R 0.810 k 3
Std. Error 745.822 Dep. Var. CRIMES

ANOVA
table
Source SS df MS F p-value
Regression 48,778,906.6927 3 16,259,635.5642 29.23 9.92E-11
Residual 25,587,492.1905 46 556,249.8302
Total 74,366,398.8832 49      

Regression output confidence interval


95%
variables coefficients std. error t (df=46) p-value 95% lower upper
-
Intercept -1,052.5531 613.1049 -1.717 .0928 2,286.6692 181.5630
DROPOUT 57.7544 15.3153 3.771 .0005 26.9262 88.5826
DENSITY -1.9318 0.5270 -3.666 .0006 -2.9926 -0.8710
URBAN 67.8889 8.4077 8.075 2.30E-10 50.9650 84.8127
             
Regression Analysis

R² 0.656
Adjusted R² 0.633 n 50
R 0.810 k 3
Std. Error 745.822 Dep. Var. CRIMES

ANOVA
table
Source SS df MS F p-value
Regression 48,778,906.6927 3 16,259,635.5642 29.23 9.92E-11
Residual 25,587,492.1905 46 556,249.8302
Total 74,366,398.8832 49      

Regression output confidence interval


variables coefficients std. error t (df=46) p-value 95% lower 95% upper
-
Intercept -1,052.5531 613.1049 -1.717 .0928 2,286.6692 181.5630
DROPOUT 57.7544 15.3153 3.771 .0005 26.9262 88.5826
DENSITY -1.9318 0.5270 -3.666 .0006 -2.9926 -0.8710
URBAN 67.8889 8.4077 8.075 2.30E-10 50.9650 84.8127

Predicted values for: CRIMES


        95% Confidence Interval 95% Prediction Inter

DROPOUT DENSITY URBAN Predicted lower upper lower u


13.4 50.6 58.6 3,601.8963 3,204.4090 3,999.3836 2,048.9054 5,154.

You might also like