Objective of This Case Study
Objective of This Case Study
Objective of This Case Study
Swot Analysis
Strength
1. Very innovative and engineered product
2. Highly environmental.
3. Long lasting product because of re-usability.
Opportunities
1. High potential market.
2. Attractive product.
3. Ease to use product than other.
4. Less competitors.
Weakness
1. High price.
2. Less promotion.
3. Not proper segmentation.
4. Product oriented strategies.
5. Lack of marketing people.
Threats
1. Any company that can create mouse traps.
2. Insecticide.
In order to evaluate their once-in-a-lifetime opportunity the investors need the
information ifthere’s another more sophisticated tool of fighting against mice. If
there are - theiropportunities are not so high. But ifanother tool haven’t been
invented yet and the Trap-Easeis the only innovative mousetrap on the market,
Martha and investors are able to use this opportunity.
Group would write mission strategy like “we are making innovative mousetrap that
traps mice
easily”.
I suggest writing it as: “to get rid of mice in the easiest, cleanest and safest way –
you can
2.I also think that the best target is women, as mostly women are doing
housekeeping. The otherconsumer target can be vessel-owners or docks because in
ships there are usually problemswith mice and rats. Moreover, docks will buy traps
in large amounts improving the sales of the company.
3.The company’s positioning is that the Trape-Ease “traps mice easily”. I think that
thispositioning is too broad and not catchy. I would rather position it as “the Trap-
Ease traps micecreating no clean-up problems”, or “traps mice leaving your hands
clean”.
4. Product:
Price:
Place:
Promotion:
magazines.
- $50,000 for travel costs to visit trade shows and to make sales calls on retailers
Considering the Place, I think, Trap-Ease can be also distributed through
supermarkets (likeWal-Mart and others), because housewives often visit these
kinds of supermarkets. Other itemsof marketing mix, in my opinion, can be
remained the same.
price is cheaper than Trap-Ease’s and it is the perfect substitute of the Trap-Ease.
6.The company is facing marketing myopia and its marketing strategy is too
product-oriented butnot customer-oriented. Martha cares about how to sell
expected units of traps rather than caringabout how to meet customer needs and
create value for them. I would change the marketingstrategy in the following way:
Product Strategy. The Trap-Ease America will introduce new tool fighting against
mice (for example,
the spray which smell frightens mice off so that they wouldn’t like to “enter” the
house) or improve theTrap-Ease. (For example, the plastic tube can be blacked out
(toned) so that a mouse inside the trap isnot seen as women are afraid of mice and
would prefer not to see them at all).
Control. The Trap-Ease America will strictly monitor customer service satisfaction
and control the
time of delivering the orders to retailers, especially to docks. The company will also
control that
“... to let the consumer look and try for themselves and build up the customer
mind about this product is better than others method of mousetrap. If Trap-Ease is
lack of marketing expertise they should get help from the marketing professional.
With pure marketing expertise, a series of effective promotion and advertisement
can be done. This will help to “boost up” the sales and deep into consumer mind
about benefit of this product and keep on using it in the future. By using proper
marketing methods, Trap-Ease mousetrap should be success in the market in the
future.
Trap-Ease America: The Big Cheese
of Mousetraps
Marketing
Assignment#4
Case study#1
➢Course Code:-MKT-301
➢ Submitted to:-MAM Shahla
➢ Submitted by:-Mariam
Arshad
➢ID NO:-093344
➢Submitted on:-2/10/10
INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT
SCIENCES