Project Life-Cycle
Project Life-Cycle
LIFE-CYLE
PROJECT LIFE-CYCLE
Phases of Project Life-Cycle
Input, Process and Output Format
Key Activities, Milestone, Hold-Points and
Approvals
Overlap Between Phases (fast tracking)
Level of Effort
Level of Influence vs. Cost of Change
I. Phases of Project Life-Cycle
Concept and Initiation Phase (Birth)
Design and Development Phase
(Planning)
Implementation or Construction
Phase (Execution and Controlling)
Commissioning and Handover
Phase (Closure)
PROJECT LIFE-CYCLE
refers to a logical sequence of activities to
accomplish the project’s goals or objectives.
Regardless of scope or complexity, any project
goes through a series of stages during its life
called phases of project life-cycle.
There is first an Initiation or Birth phase, in which
the outputs and critical success factors are
defined, followed by a Planning phase,
characterized by breaking down the project into
smaller parts/tasks, an Execution phase, in
which the project plan is executed, and lastly a
Closure or Exit phase, that marks the completion
of the project.
Project activities must be grouped into phases
because by doing so, the project manager and the
core team can efficiently plan and organize
resources for each activity, and also objectively
measure achievement of goals and justify their
decisions to move ahead, correct, or terminate. It is
of great importance to organize project phases into
industry-specific project cycles.
Why? Not only because each industry sector
involves specific requirements, tasks, and
procedures when it comes to projects, but also
because different industry sectors have different
needs for life cycle management methodology. And
paying close attention to such details is the
difference between doing things well and excelling
as project managers.
PROJECT LIFE-CYCLE
Figure 1: The four phase of the project life cycle. Adapted from J. Westland,
(fast tracking)
The project phases are shown here in sequence,
practice there may be some overlap between the
phases. Deliverables from the proceeding phase
are generally approved before work starts on the
next phase. However, if the deliverables are
approved progressively and work begins on the
following phases before the previous phases are
totally complete, this practice would be called fast
tracking. For example on a shipbuilding project
the construction of the hull may start progressively
as the drawings are available and similarly be
commissioned progressively as the work is
completed
V. Level of Effort
The project life-cycle is often presented with its
associated level of effort. This level of effort could be
any parameter that flows through the project that
can be measured, but it is most commonly expressed
as man hours or costs. These parameters can be
presented as a line graph of rate of expenditure
and/or a line graph of accumulated expenditure (see
figure I).
The profile clearly shows a slow build-up of efforts
accelerates during the implementations phase to a
maximum as the work faces are opened-up before a
sharp decline as the work is completed and
commissioned (see figure I) and the project draws
to a close.
From this curve one would naturally assume that
as the greatest level of effort occurs during the
implementation of phase, then this the most
important phase determining the success of the
project – this is after all where the product is
made.
Certainly the tools and technique developed such
as PERT, CPM, & WBS were all focusing on this
phase. But we need to consider the difference
between efficiency and effectiveness – efficiency
is doing activities right while effectiveness is
doing the right activity (see next section)
VI. Level of Influence vs. Cost
of Change
As projects become more involved and complex,
together with time pressures to shorten the
implementation phase so the need to get the design
right from the outset becomes more important .
Consider a shipbuilding project, where the cost of
changing the engine room arrangement at the
concept and design phases would be the cost of
design hours to reproducing a number of drawings.
However a change at the implementation phase
would not only incur design costs, but also the cost
to remove machinery already fitted, together with the
cost of new equipment, additional labour and maybe
penalties for late delivery.
This cost profile encourage model testing and
computer aided simulation where ideas and options
can be developed and tested cost effectively before
the implementation phase.
The stakeholder level of design influence, or potential
to add value to the project reduces as the project
progresses. As the design develops, so design
freezes must be imposed progressively for the design
to progress. For example, if the foundations are
change after the building has been change , then all
the design figures must be recalculated.
This is clearly illustrated in figure 5 where the level of
influence and cost of changes are plotted against the
project life-cycle. At the outset of the project the
potential for adding value and cost savings are at
their highest, but steadily reduce as the project
progresses - loosely mirroring this curve are the
associated cost of any changes.
The financial encouragement is therefore, to spend
proportionally more time and effort during the initial
phases to get the design right before implementation.
The opportunities for improving performance and results
on all types of projects are at the front-end . The ability to
influence the project , reduce project costs, build-in
additional value improve performance and increase
flexibility is highest at the very early conceptual and
design stages. But the time the construction or
implementation gets under way, the ability to influence the
costs has reduced considerably.
It therefore follows that the project manager should be
appointed during these early phases to ensure that the
maximum advantage is taken to influence the project effectively
KEY POINTS:
Most projects can be sub-divided into four generic
phases; concept, design, implementation and
commission.
Project do pass through a number of recognizable
stages from initiation to completion and as these
stages are interrelated and dependent on each other,
it is reasonable to say the project passes through a
project life-cycle
Phases of project life-cycle can be further sub-divided
into an input process and output format
Project phases are shown in sequence into a
proforma, but in practice there may be some overlap
between phases.