Special Contract Act

LAW ASSIGNMENT ON
SPECIAL CONTRACT
ACT & PUBIC AND
PRIVATE COMPANY
LAW ASSIGNMENT ON SPECIAL CONTRACT ACT & PUBIC
AND PRIVATE COMPANY
INDEX
S. No TOPIC PAGE No.
1 GUARANTEE 2-8
2 INDEMNITY 9-11
3 BAILMENT 12-20
4 PLEDGE 21-25
5 AGENCY 26-33
6 PRIVATE AND PUBLIC 34-39
LIMITED COMPANIES
[Type text] Page 2

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
SECTION 1
GUARANTEE
DEFINITION
[Type text] Page 3

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
A contract of guarantee is defined by the Indian Contract Act, as “ A contract to perform the
promise or discharge the liability of third person in case of his default. The person who gives the
guarantee is called the surety”, the person for whom the guarantee is given is called the
‘principal debtor’, and the person to whom the guarantee is given is called the ‘creditor’. In India
the contract of guarantee may be in oral or written but under English law the contract must be in
written.
Example: When A requests to B to lend Rs.10, 000 to C and guarantees that C will repay the
amount within the agreed period of time and that C failing to do so, he will himself pay to B,
there is a contract of guarantee.
KINDS OF GUARANTEES
1. A contract of Guarantee may be oral or in writing (section 126), though a creditor

always prefer in writing the contract to avoid disputes, while in case of oral agreement
it is very difficult to prove.
2. It is of two types:
• Specific
• Continuing
1) Specific Guarantee: It is a type of Guarantee which is intended on a particular debt and

came to an end on its repayment. This type of guarantee once given is irrevocable, and
even the death of the surety does not result in revocation of the guarantee.
2) Continuing Guarantee: When a guarantee extends to a series of transactions.
Examples:
(a) A in consideration that B will employ C in collecting the rents of B’s Zamindari,
promises B to be responsible, to the amount of 5,000 rupees, for the due collection
and payment of those rents. This is continuing Guarantee.
[Type text] Page 4

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
(b) A guarantees payment to B, a tea dealer, to the amount of Rs.10, 000, for any tea
from time to time supply to C. B supplies C with tea to the above value of Rs.10, 000,
and C pays B for it. Afterwards B supplies C with tea to the value of Rs.15, 000. C
fails to pay. The guarantee given by A was continuing guarantee and he is
accordingly liable to B to the extent of Rs.10,000.
A guarantee regarding the conduct of another is a continuing guarantee, unlike specific

guarantee which is irrevocable; a continuing guarantee can be revoked regarding future
transactions (section 130).
Example:
A guarantee to B to the extent of Rs.10, 000, that C shall pay all the bills that B shall draw
upon him. B draws upon C. C accepts the bill. A gives notice of revocation. C dishonors the
bill at maturity. A is liable upon his guarantee.
The death of the surety operates, in the absence of any contract to the contrary, as a
revocation of a continuing guarantee, so far as regards future transactions (Section 131).
RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CREDITOR
RIGHTS: The rights of a creditor are:
(a) The creditor has the right to demand from the surety as soon as the principal debtor
refuses to pay or makes default in payments.
(b) Where surety is insolvent, the creditor is entitled to proceed in the surety’s insolvency
and claim the pro rata dividend.
OBLIGATIONS: The Indian Contract Act, 1872 imposes the following obligations:
(a) Not to change any terms of the original contract: Under section 133, the creditor is not
allowed to make any changes in the contract without seeking the consent of the surety.
[Type text] Page 5

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
Any variance made in the contract without consent, then the terms of the contract
between the principal debtor and the creditor, discharges he surety as to the transactions
subsequent to the variance.
Example: A banker contracts to lend X Rs.5000 on March 4.A guarantees repayment.

The banker pays X Rs.5,000 on January .A in this case is discharged from his liability as
the contracts has been varied as much as the banker might sue X before March 4, but it
cannot sue A as the guarantee is from March 4.
(b)Not to release or discharge the principal debtor: The creditor is under an obligation
not to release or discharge the principal debtor. Section 134 states: “the surety is
discharged by a contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, by which the
principal debtor is released, or by any act or omission of the creditor, the legal
consequence of which is the discharge of the principal debtor.
(c) Not to compound, or give time to, or agree not to sue the principal debtor: Section
135 provides, ‘A contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, by which the
creditor makes a composition with or promises to give time to, or not to sue the principal
debtor, discharges the surety, unless the surety assents to such contract’.
(d)Not to do any act inconsistent with the rights of surety (section 135): Where C lends
money to B on the security of joint and several promissory notes made in C’s favor by B
and by A as surety for B, together with a bill of sale of B’s furniture, which gives power
to sell the furniture and apply the proceeds in discharge of the note. Sub sequentially, C
sells the furniture, but, owing to his misconduct and willful negligence, only a small price
is realized, then A is discharged from liability on the note.
RIGHTHS OF SURETY
It can be classified under three heads:
[Type text] Page 6

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
1) Rights against the creditor: In case of fidelity guarantee, the surety can direct creditor
to dismiss the employee whose honesty he has guaranteed, in the event of proved
dishonesty of the employee. The creditor’s failure to do so will forgive the surety from
his liability.
2) Rights against the principal debtor:
(a) Right of subrogation: Section 140 states that when the surety has to pay all the debts
of principal debtor, then he has all the rights of creditor against the principal debtor.
(b) Right to indemnify: The surety has the right to recover from the principal debtor, the
amounts which he has rightfully paid under the contract of guarantee.
3) Rights against co-sureties:
(a) Rights of contribution: Where a debt has been guaranteed by more than one person,
they are called as co-sureties. Section 146 provides for a right of contribution between
them. When a surety has paid more than his share, he has a right of contribution from
the other surety who are equally bound to pay with him.
(b) Where the co-sureties have guaranteed different sums, they are bound under section
147 to contribute equally, subject to the limit fixed by their guarantee, and not
proportionately to the liability undertaken.
LIABILITIES OF SURETY (SECTION 128)
Unless the contract provides otherwise, the liability of the surety is co-extensive with that
of the principal debtor. In other words, the surety is liable for all those amounts, the
principal debtor is liable for.
Example: A guarantees to B the payment of a bill of exchange by C, the acceptor. The

bill is dishonored by C. A is liable not only for the amount of the bill but also for any
interest and charges which may have become due to it.
[Type text] Page 7

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
POSITION OF SURETY IN CASE OF A MINOR DEBTOR
According to the decision of the Bombay High Court in Kashiba v. Shripat I.L.R. 10
Bom.1927 the surety can be held liable, though a minor debt is not liable.
DISCHARGE OF SURETY
The liability of a surety under a contract of guarantee may at any time be revoked by the
surety, as to the future transactions, by notice to the creditor.
However, where one of the co-sureties informs the creditor that the debtors are likely to
wind-up their business and withdrawn his guarantee and the other surety does not take
such step, the Himachal Pradesh High Court in Anil Kr. And others v. Central Bank of
India AIR 1997 HP 5 held that the other surety shall be liable along with the principal
debtors for the repayment of the loan.
1) By death of surety (Section 131): The death of the surety operates, in the
absence of any contract to the contrary, as a revocation of a continuing
guarantee, so far as regards future transactions.
2) By variance in terms of contract (Section 133): Any variance, made without

the surety’s consent, in the terms of contract between the principal debtor and
the creditor, discharges the surety as to transactions subsequent to the
variance.
3) By release of discharge of principal debtor (Section 134): The surety is

discharged by any contract between the creditor and the principal debtor, by
[Type text] Page 8

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
which the principal debtor is released, or by any act or omission of the

creditor, the legal consequence of which is the discharge of the principal
debtor.
Example: A contracts with B for a fixed price to build a house for A within a
stipulated time, B supplying the necessary timber. C guarantees A’s
performance of the contract. B omits to supply the timber. C is discharged
from his surety ship.
4) By compounding with, or giving time to, or agreeing not to sue, principal

debtor (section 135): A contract between the creditor and the principal debtor
by which the creditor makes a composition with, or promises to give time to,
or not to sue the principal debtor, discharges the surety. The surety shall,
however, be not discharged if (a) he assets to such contract, (b) the contract to
give time to the principal debtor is made by the creditor with a third person,
and not with the principal debtor.
Example: C, the holder of an overdue bill of exchange drawn by A as surety

for B, and accepted by B, contracts with M to give time to B. A is not
discharged.
5) Loss of security: If the creditor loses or parts with any security given to hi, by
the principal debtor at the time of contract of guarantee was made, the surety
is discharged to the extent of the value of the security, unless the surety
consented to the release of such security (section 141).
[Type text] Page 9

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
SECTION 2
INDEMNITY
[Type text] Page 10
AND PRIVATE COMPANY
DEFINITION
A contract in which one party promises to set aside the other from loss caused due to him by the
conduct of the promisor himself, or by the conduct of any other person is called a contract of
indemnity (Section 124). The contracts of indemnity have all the essentials of a valid contract
just like other contracts. The person who promises to make good the loss is called the
indemnifier (i.e. promisor). The person whose loss is to be made good is called indemnified or
indemnity holder (promise). A contract of indemnity could be raised either by: an express
promise to indemnify or cases where the loss is caused by the conduct of the promisor himself or
by conduct of any other person.
It could be exemplified as: ‘A’ and ‘B’ claims that certain goods from a railway company as
adversary owners. ‘A’ takes the goods by agreeing to compensate the railway company loss
whereas ‘B’ turns out to be the real owner of the goods. Here, there is a contract of indemnity
between ‘A’ and the railway company.
[Type text] Page 11

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
RIGHT OF THE INDEMNIFIED (i.e. THE INDEMNITY HOLDER)
In section 125, it deals with right of indemnity holder when sued. According to it that person is
entitled to recover from the promisor in following ways:
a. All damages which may be required to pay in any suit in respect of any matter to which
the promise to indemnity applies.
b. All the cost in which he may be required to pay in bringing or defending such suits. He
may have acted under the authority of the indemnifier or if he didn’t acted in breaking of
orders of the indemnifier and in such way as a sensible man would act in his own case.
c. All sums which he could have paid under the terms of any compromise of any such suit.
The compromise should not be contrary to the order of the indemnifier and should be
prudent or authorized by the indemnifier.
RIGHT OF INDEMNIFIER
The Indian contract act is still about the rights of the indemnifier in the contract of indemnity.
However, his rights, in such cases are similar to the rights of the surety under section 148. He
becomes entitled to the benefits of all the securities which the creditor has against the principle
debtor whether he was responsive of them or not.
COMMENCEMENT OF INDEMNIFIER’S LIABILITY
[Type text] Page 12

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
The requirement of indemnity is that the party which is to be indemnified should never be called
upon to be paid. Indemnity is not necessary given by repayment after payment. The indemnified
may induce the indemnifier to place him in a position to meet liability that may be casted upon
him without waiting until the promise (indemnified) has actually discharged it.
DISSIMILARITY BETWEEN CONTRACT OF GUARANTEE AND CONTRACT OF

INDEMNITY
1. The liability of a promisor is primary and independent in a contract of indemnity. In a

contract of guarantee, the liability of the surety is secondary the primary liability being
that of the principal debtor.
2. In the case of guarantee, there is an existing debt or obligation, the performance of which
is guaranteed by the surety. Whereas in case of indemnity the possibility of any loss
occurrence is a contingency against which the indemnifier undertakes to indemnify.
3. In a contract of guarantee, after discharging the debt, the surety is entitled to proceed
against the principal debtor in his own name while in case of indemnity, the indemnifier
cannot proceed against third parties in his own name, unless there is an assignment in his
favour.
[Type text] Page 13

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
[Type text] Page 14

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
SECTION 3
BAILMENT
DEFINITION (SECTION 148)
[Type text] Page 15

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
It is defined as ‘ delivery of goods by one to another person for some purpose, upon a contract
that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or otherwise disposed of
according to the directions of persons delivering them’. Bailor is the person who delivers goods
and Bailee is a person to whom goods are delivered. This section indicates out that delivery of
ownership is not obligatory, where one person who already have the ownership of the goods and
contracts them to be as bailee.
It could be explained by certain illustrations such as: ‘X’ delivers laptop to ‘Y’; person giving his
laptop for repair, ‘X’ delivers diamond to ‘Y’; person giving diamond for making diamond
jewelry.
CHARACTERISTICS
1. Delivery of goods: The real meaning of bailment is liberation of goods by one person to
another for some short-term purpose. The delivery of goods could be actual or
constructive. Delivery which could be made by handling over goods to the bailee is said
to be actual delivery. Constructive deliveries could be made by doing something which
has the effect of depositing the goods in the ownership of the bailee or giving authority to
any person to hold the goods on his behalf. Bailment is concerned with goods only.
Such as: ‘A’ is holding goods on behalf of ‘B’, agrees to hold goods on behalf of ‘C’.
This shows a constructive transfer of ownership from ‘C’ to ‘A’.
‘A’ was the owner of a car and now he sells it to ‘B’ so, ‘B’ becomes the owner of
the car. ‘B’ leaves his car in the possession of ‘A’, here ‘A’ now becomes a bailee, earlier
he was the owner.
2. Bailment is based on a contract: In bailment the delivery of goods are made under a
contract which means when the purpose of the work is completed, then it should be
returned to the bailor. Like: when a person gives his TV to get repaired in a shop, then a
receipt is given to him and it is agreed that when it is repaired it would be returned back
to him.
[Type text] Page 16

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
Bailment is usually made on contracts, however there are certain exceptions. This could
be illustrated with an example: When a person finds any lost goods, then the finder is
treated as the bailee of the lost article. Though, there was no such contract between the
finder and the real owner. (Section 168)
3. Return of good in specie: The goods are delivered for some purpose and it is agreed that
the particular good would be returned. Return of the precise good (in specie) is a vital
part of the bailment. This means returning the goods in the same condition. Thus, where
an equivalent and not the same are not agreed then there is no bailment.
4. Ownership of goods: In bailment, it is only the possession of goods which is transferred

not the ownership. Hence, the person who is delivering the possession of goods, need not
to be the owner. The purpose is to transfer the possession of goods not the ownership.
KINDS OF BAILMENT
Bailment is classified into six categories:
1. Deposit: The delivery of goods from one person to another for the use of the previous i.e.
bailor.
2. Commodatum: Goods lend by a person to his friend, who can use it without paying
anything to that person.
3. Hire: Goods lent to the Bailee for hire, i.e. in return for payment of money.
[Type text] Page 17

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
4. Pawn or Pledge: The goods are deposited to another person, in return of some money
borrowed.
5. The delivery of goods either for transporting them or something is to be done about them,
by the Bailee for some reward.
6. The delivery of goods either for transporting them or something is to be done about them,
by the Bailee without reward.
DUTIES AND RIGHTS OF BAILOR AND BAILEE
1. To disclose know faults in the goods (section 150): The goods which are delivered by the
bailor and if the bailor knows that some fault is there and materially interfered with the
use of it or exposed the bailee with extraordinary risks then, the bailor is bound to
disclose the faults of goods to bailee. If the goods are bailed for hire or reward, the bailor
is responsible for any damage in the goods, whether he was or was not aware of the
existence of such faults in the good at the time bailed.
It could be illustrated by an example: ‘A’ lends his bike to ‘B’ and ‘A’ knew that the bike
brakes were not working properly but he didn’t informed ‘B’. Now, ‘B’ drives bike and
had a small accident near his locality and got hurt, at this moment ‘A’ would be
responsible to ‘B’ for damages sustained.
2. Liability for breach of warranty as to title: if there is any loss in which bailor was not
entitled to make the bailment or to receive back the goods or to give directions respecting
them then, bailor is held responsible for it. (Section 164)
[Type text] Page 18

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
Example: ‘A’ gives ‘B’s car to ‘C’ without taking permission or informing ‘B’ then, ‘B’
can sue ‘C’ for it and could receive compensation from him. ‘A’ who is the bailor is now
responsible to make good this loss to ‘C’, the bailee.
3. To bear expense in case of gratuitous bailment’s: Concerning bailment under which

bailee is to receive no remuneration, under section 158, it states that in the absence of a
contract to the contrary, the bailor is supposed to repay all the necessary expenses
incurred by him for the purpose of the bailment, to the bailee.
4. In case of non-gratuitous bailments, the bailor is held responsible to bear only extra-
ordinary expenses.
Example: ‘A’ lends his car to ‘B’. The ordinary expenses would be like filling up petrol,
which has to be taken care of ‘B’. Now, if the car acquires some problem then the money
spent in its repair will be considered as an extra-ordinary expenditure and is borne by the
bailor.
DUTIES OF A BAILEE
1. To take care of the goods bailed (section 151): In all the cases of bailment, the bailee has
to take care of the goods which were bailed to him, as a man of ordinary cautiousness
would. Under similar circumstances, the goods owned of the same bulk, quantity and
should value as the goods bailed. In case, bailee is taking certain steps to take care of the
goods as expressed above then, he shall not be responsible, in the absence of any special
contract, for the loss, destruction or wear and tear of the thing bailed (section 152).
[Type text] Page 19

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
2. Not to make unauthorised use of goods (section 154): If bailee makes some unauthorised
use of goods which could be done by using them in a way which are not justified by the
terms of bailment then, he is legally responsible to make compensation to the bailor for
any damages occurring to the goods from or during such use of them.
Example: ‘A’ gives his laptop to ‘B’ so, that ‘B’ could use it only for some work purpose.
‘B’ allows ‘C’ to use the laptop given by ‘A’; but ‘C’ corrupts the laptop system. Now,
‘A’ is legally responsible to take compensation from ‘B’ for the damages done to the
laptop system.
3. Not to mix bailer’s goods with his own (sections 155-157): If the bailee without the
approval of the bailor, mixes the goods of the bailor with his own goods and separates
and divides the goods then, the bailee has to take the responsibility and bear the expenses
of separation or division and any damages arising from the mixture of goods.
Examples: ‘A’ bails 100 bales of cotton with a particular mark to ‘B’. ‘B’ without taking
permission from ‘A’ he mixes his own bales of cotton with a different mark in those 100
bales of cotton. Now, ‘A’ is entitled to have his 100 bales of cotton back from ‘B’ and
now ‘B’ has to bear all the expenses incurred in the separation of the bales and any other
incidental damages.
However, if the goods are mixed in such a manner than it is not possible to separate the
goods bailed from the other goods and deliver them back, the bailor is entitled to be
compensated by the bailee for the loss of the goods.
[Type text] Page 20

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
Example: ‘A’ bails a 1kg of packet of flour to ‘B’ worth Rs.300. ‘B’ without consent of
‘A’ mixes cheap quality of flour in it which worth only Rs.180. Since ‘A’ is entitled to
have his packet of flour back but it is not possible to separate it so, ‘B’ has to compensate
‘A’ for the loss of flour.
4. To return the goods bailed without demand (section 160): It is a duty of the bailee to
return or deliver the goods bailed according to the bailor’s directions, without demand, as
soon as the time for which they were bailed has expired or the purpose for which they
were bailed has been accomplished. If the bailee fails to deliver the goods at the proper
time, he is responsible to the bailor for any loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods
from that time.
5. To return any accretion to the goods bailed (section 163): In the absence of any contract
to the contrary, the bailee is bound to deliver to the bailor, or according to his directions,
any increase or profit which may have accrued from the goods bailed.
RIGHTS OF A BAILEE
1. A bailee can sue a bailor for certain things which are:
[Type text] Page 21

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
a. Calming reimbursement for the damages resulting from non-disclosure of faults in the
goods.
b. If there is any violating of warranty as to the title and the damages resulting from
there.
c. Any extraordinary expenses.
Therefore, in the case of illegal denial the bailee has a right to use the same solution
which the owner might have used in the case like this.
2. Another right of bailee is the right of lien (sections 170-171): Lien is a right in one person
to retain that which is in his possession, belonging to another, until some debt or claim is
paid, Lien, thus assumes two things:
a. The person who has the right of lien is in possession of the goods or securities in the
ordinary course of business.
b. The owner i.e. bailor have got a lawful debt due or obligation to discharge to the
person in possession of the said goods or securities i.e. baliee.
Lien is available only until the debt or claim is fulfilled, once the debt is fulfilled or
obligations are discharged, the right of lien is put out. There are two types of lien:
a. General lien: It means the right to retain goods not only for due to the rise in demand
out of goods but even for a general balance of account in favour of certain persons.
b. Particular lien: It means the right to retain the particular goods in respect of which the
claim is due.
[Type text] Page 22

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
3. Right against wrongful deprivation of or injury to goods: If a third person wrongfully

deprive the bailee of the use or possession of the goods bailed or causes them injury, the
bailee is entitled to use such remedies as the owner might have used in the like case if no
bailment has been made and either the bailor or the bailee may bring a suit against the
third person for such deprivation or injury. Now, whatever is obtained by the way of
relief or compensation from this is taken care between the bailor and the bailee and is
dealt with according to their respective interest.
RIGHTS OF A BAILOR
1. The bailor could enforce, by suit, all duties or liabilities of the bailee.
2. The bailor could demand his return whenever he pleases, even though he lent it for a
specified time or purpose, in case of gratuitous bailment (i.e. bailment without reward). If
on assurance of such bailment, the borrowers have acted in such a manner that the return
of the thing before the specified time would cause him (i.e. bailee) loss exceeding the
benefit derived by him from the bailment, the bailor must indemnify the borrower for the
loss if he comples an immediate return (section 159).
TERMINATION OF BAILMENT
A contract of bailment terminates or comes to an end under the following circumstances:
[Type text] Page 23

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
1. At the time of the expiry of the stipulated period. Here, the bailment is for a specific
period, it comes to an end once the specified time has expired.
Example: ‘A’ hires a car from ‘B’ for a period of 4 months. Now, when the specified
time of 4 months are over then ‘A’ has to return back the car to ‘B’.
2. On the completion of the specified purpose. In case, bailment is for specific purpose it
terminates as soon as the purpose is accomplished.
3. If the bailee does anything with regard to the goods bailed which is not in agreement with
the conditions of the bailment, the bailor may cease the bailment (section 153).
Example: ‘A’ hires a horse from ‘B’ for his own riding purpose only, but ‘A’ is also
using the horse to pull his carriage then ‘B’ can terminate the contract.
4. A gratuitous bailment could be put to an end at any time (section 159). This is terminated
even when there is death of either the bailor or the bailee. However, if premature
termination causes any loss to the bailee exceeding the benefit derived from the bailment,
then bailor could indemnify.
[Type text] Page 24

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
SECTION 4
PLEDGE
[Type text] Page 25
AND PRIVATE COMPANY
DEFINITION
A pledge is a bailment of goods as security for payment of debt or performance of a promise
Pawner is the Bailor of such goods and Pawnee is the Bailee of the goods.
Pledges are form of security to assure that person will repay debt under a contract. In a pledge a
person gives possession temporarily to another person or property. Pledge is a bailment of goods
as security for payment of debt or performance of a promise. Pledges are used in securing loans,
pawning property for cash and guarantying that contracted work will be done. Every pledge has
three parts: two separate parties, an obligation or debt and contract of pledge.
Example1:
A businessman pledged a railway receipt to a bank, duly endorsed. Later he was declared
bankrupt. The official assignee contended that the pledge of a railway receipt was not valid.
Apprehended that the railway receipts in India are titled to goods and that the pledge of the
railway receipt to the bank, duly endorsed, constituted a valid pledge of the goods.
[Type text] Page 26

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
Similarly, where the goods continue to remain in the borrower’s possession but are agreed to be
held as a ‘Bailee’ on behalf of the pledge and subject to the pledge’s order, it amounts to
constructive delivery, and is a valid pledge.
Example 2:
Suppose if A has taken loan of Rs.10.00 lakh from bank of Maharashtra against the security of
goods kept in the warehouse on 10-07-2007.
On 10-08-2007 you took a clean overdraft of Rs.2.00 lakh without offering any security. On 10-
12-2007, you paid Rs.10.00 lakh with interest towards the first loan and requested the bank to
release the goods from warehouse. The bank is entitled to retain the goods sufficient to cover the
second overdraft of Rs.2.00 lakh and they can release only the proportionate goods.
ADVANTAGES OF PLEDGE
To a creditor, pledge is perhaps the most satisfactory mode of creating a charge on goods. It
offers the following advantages:
1. The goods are in possession of the creditor and therefore, in case the borrower makes a
default in payment, they can be disposed of after a reasonable notice.
2. Stocks cannot be manipulated as they are under the lender’s possession and control.
3. In the case of insolvency of the borrower, lender can sell the goods and prove for the
balance of the debt, if any.
4. There is hardly any possibility of the same good being charged with some other party if
actual possession of the goods is taken by the lender.
WHO MAY PLEDGE?
[Type text] Page 27

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
As per the rule, only the owner of the goods has a right to pledge the goods. A non-owner of
goods cannot make a valid pledge. However, there are exceptions to the rule when even a non –
owner can make a valid pledge. These exceptions are:
(1)PLEDGE OF GOODS BY MERCHANTILE AGENTS: If a mercantile agent is in

possession of goods or the documents of title to goods with the consent of the owner he
may pledge such goods in the ordinary course of his business provided he is acting under
the express authorization of the owner of goods and the pledge is in the interest of the
owner.
It is important to note here that only a commission agent can make a valid pledge on
behalf of the owner. Any other person who is not an agent and is in possession of another
person’s goods, or is a broker, cannot make a valid pledge.
(2)PLEDGE WHERE PAWNOR HAS LIMITED INTERESTS IN GOODS: Where a

person pledges goods in which he has only a limited interest, the pledge is valid to the
extent of the limited interest. FOR EXAMPLE, A finds a watch belonging to B on the
roadside. A spends Rs.30 on its repair and pledges it for Rs.100. In this case, A’s pledge
will be valid only to the extent of Rs.30 and B can claim his watch by paying Rs.30 to A.
(3)PLEDGE BY A PERSON IN POSSESSION UNDER A VOIDABLE CONTRACT:

Where a person obtains possession of goods under a voidable contract i.e. by fraud, under
influence or coercion.
[Type text] Page 28

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
Example: If Mohan pledges a ratio set which is already sold to Vikas for Rs.300, and
Vikas does not know that the ratio set has already been sold to Mahesh, the contract of
pledge will be a valid contract.
(4)PLEDGE BY CO-OWNER IN POSSESSION OF GOODS: When the goods belong

to more than one owner, and the goods are in the possession of one of the co-owners, and
if the person bins possession of goods pledge the goods with the consent of the other co-
owners, the pledge so created will be deemed to be valid.
(5)PLEDGE BY A BUYER IN POSSESSION BEFORE SALE IS COMPLETED:

Sometimes before the sale is completed, with the consent of owner of the goods, the
goods are delivered to the buyer. The buyer in such a case is not yet the owners of the
goods. But if the buyer makes a pledge of the goods and Pawnee accepts the pledge, it is
deemed to be valid pledge.
FOR EXAMPLE: Vijay buys a machine in hire-purchase. The transfer of ownership of

the machine will only take place when he has paid all the installments of the hire-
purchase. If he pledge the machine before he has completed the payment due for it, and
the Pawnee accepts it in good faith, it will be a valid contract of pledge.
DUTIES OF A PLEDGOR AND PLEDGEE:
DUTIES OF A PLEDGEE:
1. The pledgee is required to take as much care of the goods pledged to him as a person of
ordinary prudence would, take of his own goods, of a similar nature.
2. The pledge must not put the goods to an unauthorized use.
[Type text] Page 29

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
3. The pledge is bound to return the goods on payment of the debt.
4. Any accruals to the goods pledged belong to pledgor and should be delivered
accordingly.
DUTIES OF A PLEDGOR:
1. He must disclose to the pledge any material faults or extraordinary risks in the goods to
which the pledge may be exposed.
2. He is responsible to meet any extra ordinary expenditure incurred by the pledge for the
preservation of the goods.
3. Where the pledge has exercised his right of sale of goods, any shortfall has to be made
good by the pledgor.
4. He is liable for any losses caused to the pledge because of defects in his (pledgor’s) title
to the goods.
[Type text] Page 30

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
SECTION 5
AGENCY
DEFINITION:
[Type text] Page 31

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
Agent is a person employed to do work or represent him on behalf of that person in dealing with
third person. The person for whom the agent worked is called the Principal. The relationship
between the two is called as an Agency which is based on an agreement.
The function of an agent is to bring about contractual relationship between the principal and the
third party or we can say that the agent act as a link between the principal and the third party.
The act of the agent within the scope of the instruction, bind the principal as if he has done them
by himself.
Agent must be distinguish from servant, as a servant acts under the direct control fo his master
while the agent is bound to do his exercise under lawful instructions and agent may also work for
several principals while servant usually serves one master.
Any person who is a major and also sound minded can employ an agent. No qualification
prescribed by the law for a person to be an agent except that he attained majority and also sound
minded and if an agent acts for a minor or a lunatic, he will be personally liable to third party.
EXAMPLE: Raj appoints Mahesh a minor to sell his car for not less than Rs.80,000. Mahesh
sells it for 70,000. Raj will be held bound by the transaction and further shall have no right
against Mahesh for claiming the compensation for having not obeyed the instructions, since
Mahesh is a minor and a contract with a minor is void abinitio.
DIFFERENT KINDS OF AGENCIES:
A contract of agency may be created by an express agreement or by implication or by

ratification. Thus there are different kinds of agencies are listed below:
1. Express Agency (s.187): A person may be appointed as agent either by word of mouth
or by writing. No particular form is required for appointment of an agent. The usual form
of a written contract is the “power of attorney” on a stamped paper.
[Type text] Page 32

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
2. Implied Agency (s.187): These agencies arise from the conduct, situation or relationship
of parties. It includes three types:
2.1 Agency by Estoppel (s.237): When a person has, by his statements, induced others to
believe that a certain person is his agent, he is estopped sub sequentially denying it.
2.2 Agency by Holding out: Though part of the law of estoppel, some affirmative conduct
by the principal is necessary in creation of agency by holding out.
2.3 Agency of Necessity (s.189): This arises when there is no express appointment of a
person as agent for another but he is forced to act on behalf a particular person
3. Agency of Ratification (Ss.196-200): When the agent works beyond the authority of the
principal or exceeds the given authority then the principal is not held bound by the
transaction. However s.197 permits if the principal want to ratify the act of the agent,
then it will have the same effect as it was done by his authority. In this case the agency is
said to be created by ratification. In other words, the agency come into existence from
the moment the agent first came into existence.
However, for the rule of relation back to apply, the agent while accepting the offer
should not show lack of authority, e.g., where he accepts, .subject to ratification’, the
rule of ratification does not apply and revocation shall be valid, if communicated prior to
such ratification.
4. Agency Coupled with Interest: When the agent has himself an interest in the subject
matter of the agency, the agency is one coupled with interest.
[Type text] Page 33

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
CLASSIFICATION OF AGENTS
The classification of agents is given below:
1. Special and General Agents: A special agent is a person who is appointed to do some
particular act or enter into some particular contract and has some limited authority and if
he does anything beyond his authority, then he is personally liable to the third party. On
the other hand a general agent is the one who is appointed to represent the principal in all
matters concerning a particular business.
2. Mercantile or Commercial Agents: A mercantile or commercial agent may be one of

the following forms: Broker, Factor, Commission agent, Del credere agent, auctioneer,
banker, Pakka and Katcha Aditias, and Indentor. A broker is a mercantile agent where he
engaged to buy or sell property or to make bargains contracts between the engager and
third party for a commission.
3. Non-mercantile or Non-commercial Agents: Some of the agents in this category are:

wife, estate agent, counsels (advocate), and attorneys. The following principals provide
guidelines as regards wife as agent of her husband: (i) If the wife and husband are living
together and the wife is looking for necessaries, she is agent. (ii) Where the wife lives
apart from the husband, through no fault of hers, the husband is liable to provide for her
maintenance. But where the wife lives apart under no justifiable circumstances, she is not
her husband’s agent and thus cannot bind him even for necessaries.
[Type text] Page 34

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
4. Sub-agent and Substituted Agent (Ss. 190-195): The general rule is that the agent
cannot appoint agent. But under S.190 Agent may appoint an agent under following
circumstances: (i) where expressly permitted by the principal; (ii) where the ordinary
custom of trade permits delegation; (iii) the nature of agency is such that it cannot be
accomplished without the appointment of sub-agent; (iv) in an unforeseen emergency.
DUTIES AND RIGHTS OF AGENT
1. DUTIES OF AGENT: The duties of agents towards his principal are:
1. To conduct the business of agency according to the principal’s direction: The

agent is not supposed to deviate from the directions of the principal even for the
principal’s benefit.
2. The agent should conduct the business with the skill and diligence: That is
generally possessed by persons engaged in similar business, except where the
principal knows that the agent is wanting in skill (s.212).
3. To render proper accounts: The agent has to render proper accounts, means
maintaining proper accounts supported by vouchers.
4. To communicate with the principal in case of difficulty: It is the duty of the agent,
in case any difficulty to communicate with the principal.
5. Not to make any secret profiy: Agent should deliver to the principal all moneys
including secret commission received by him.
6. Not to deal on his own account: Agent should not deal on his own account without
the principal’s consent.
[Type text] Page 35

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
7. Not to disclose any confidential information: The agent must not disclose any
information of the agency supplied to him by principal.
2. RIGHTS OF AGENTS: Agent has a number of rights. These are:
1. Right to remuneration: Under section 219 and 220 agent is entitled to his agreed
commission or remuneration, but remuneration does not become payable unless he
has carried out the object of the agency, except when there is a contract to a contrary.
2. Right of retainer (s.221): Agent may retain, out of any sums received on account of
the principal in the business of the agency, all money due to himself in respect of
advances made or expenses properly incurred by him in conducting such business of
agency.
3. Right of lien: In the absence of a contract to the contrary, the agent has the right to
retain goods, documents, movable and immovable property of the principal that is in
his custody till time that he receives the payment for commission, services paid or
accounted for by him.
4. Right of stoppage in transit: The agent can stop the goods while in transit in two
cases: (a) If he purchases the goods on behalf of principal either from his own funds
or by incurring a personal liability and the principal become insolvent then he can
stop the transit of the goods. (b) Where agent holds himself liable to his principal for
the price of the goods sold.
5. Right of indemnification (Ss.222-224): The principal is bound to indemnify agent

against the consequences of all lawful acts done by the agent in exercise of authority
conferred on him.
[Type text] Page 36

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
6. Right to compensation for injury caused by principal’s neglect (s.225): The

principal must make compensation to his agent in respect of injury caused to such
agent by the principal’s neglect or want of skill.
PRINCIPAL’S DUTIES TO THE AGENT AND HIS LIABILITY TO THIRD PARTIES
DUTIES OF A PRINCIPAL
The rights of agents or duties of principal. Thus a principal is:
1. Bound to indemnify the agent against the consequences of all lawful acts done by such
agent in exercise of authority conferred upon him (s.221)
2. Liable to indemnify agent against the consequences of an act done in good faith , though
it causes an injury to the rights of third person (s.223)
3. Bound to compensate his agent in respect of injury caused to such agent by the
principal’s neglect or want of skill (s.225)
The principal is, however, not liable for acts which are criminal in nature though done by the
agent at the instance of the principal (s.224).
LIABILITY OF PRINCIPAL TO THIRD PARTIES
1. Agent being a mere connecting link binds the principal for all his acts done within the
scope of authority (s.226).
2. The principal is liable for the acts of the agent falling not only within the actual authority
but also with in the scope of his ostensible authority.
3. Under (s.227) the only binding between the agent and the principal is the part which
agent performed under the given authority.
4. The principal remains liable to the third party even his name is not disclosed. The third
parties, on discovering his name, can proceed against him on the contract.
[Type text] Page 37

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
5. The principal is bound by any notice or information given to the agent in the course of
business transacted by him.
6. The liability of the principal continues even in cases where agent is held personally
liable. Section 223 provides an option to the third parties to either sue the principal or
agent or both.
Undisclosed Principal: Where agent, though discloses the fact that he is agent working for some
principal, conceals the name of principal, such a principal is called an undisclosed principal. The
liability of an undisclosed principal is same as disclosed principal. However the principal must
exist at the time of contract.
Concealed Principal: Where agent conceals not only the name of the principal but the very fact
that there is a principal, the principal is called a concealed principal. In such case, the third
parties are not aware of the principal and must look to the agents for payment and performance,
and the agent may sue or be sued on the contract.
TERMINATION OF AGENCY
There are certain circumstances under which the termination of agency takes place. These are
given below:
1. On revocation by the principal: The principal may, by notice, revoke the authority of
agent any time. In case of continuous agency, notice of revocation is essential to the
agent as well as to the third parties who have acted on the agency with the knowledge of
the principal.
2. On the expiry of fixed period of time: When the agency is for a fixed period of time, it
comes to an end on the expiry of that time.
[Type text] Page 38

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
3. On the performance of the specific purpose: Where agent is appointed to do a

particular act, agency terminates when the act is done or when the performance becomes
impossible.
4. Insanity or death of the principal or agent: Death or insanity of the agent or principal
terminates the agency. But, agent, in such case, should take all reasonable steps for the
preservation of the property, on behalf of the legal representatives of the principal
(s.209).
5. An agency shall also terminate in case the subject matter is either destroyed or rendered
unlawful.
6. Insolvency of the principal: Insolvency of the principal, not of the agent, terminates the
agency.
7. By renunciation of agency by the agent: If principal can terminate the agency by

revocation, agent may renounce his agency by giving a sufficient notice to that effect.
Where, however, agency is for a fixed period and the agency is renounced without a
sufficient cause, the principal must be compensated.
[Type text] Page 39

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
SECTION 6
PUBLIC & PRIVATE LIMITED
COMPANIES
PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANIES
A private company can be formed by merely two persons by subscribing their names to the
Memorandum of Association. Such a company must have a minimum paid up capital of Rs.1lakh
or such higher paid up capital, as may be prescribed and by its article must:-
• Prohibit an invitation to the public to subscribe to its shares and its debentures;
[Type text] Page 40

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
• Restrict the rights of its members to transfer shares; and
• Limit the number of its member to fifty, excluding its employee-members or past
employee-members; provided that where two or more persons hold one or more shares in
a company jointly, they shall, for the purpose of its definition, be treated as a single
member.
• Prohibit any invitation or acceptance of deposits from person other than its members,
directors or their relatives.
• A private limited company cannot trade its shares on the stock market.
NAME OF SOME PRIVATE COMPANIES
1. INFOSYS
2. RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED
3. ADITYA BIRLA GROUP
SPECIAL PRIVILAGES AVAILABLE TO A PRIVATE COMPANY
• A private company can proceed to allot shares at minimum subscription, and also can
issue shares without issuing a prospectus.
• A private company can issue any kind of shares and allow disproportionate voting rights
since Sections 85 to 89 of the act are not applicable to it.
• A private company is not required to hold a statutory meeting or to file a statutory of

report with the registrar of the companies.
• The directors of company need not file their written consent to act as directors or to take
up their qualification share. The directors of a private company need not retire by
rotation.
[Type text] Page 41

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
• A private company can give financial assistance directly or indirectly for purchase or
subscription of its own share.
• No person other than the members of a private company is entitled to inspect, or obtain
copies of profit and loss account of the company under Section 610.
• A private company may, by its articles, provide special grounds for vacation of office of
a director.
• Provisions regarding prohibition of loan directors, etc. (Section 295) is not applicable to a
private company.
• The company must display ‘Ltd’ after its name. This warns people who lend it money
that its owners have limited liability and may not be able to pay back the debt.
LOSS OF PRIVILIGES BY A PRIVATE COMPANY
Section 43 provides that if a private company contravenes any of the four conditions included in
its articles as per Section 3(1)(iii), then it will be treated as if it is a public company and it will
the result in loss of privileges and exemptions to which it is normally entitled to.
ADVANTAGES OF PRIVAYE LIMITED COMPANIES
1. Limitation of liability is there as there is no distinction between business money and

personal money. The private limited company advantages are that the company is a
separate corporate body and liability for payment of debts stops with the private limited
company, the owners and shareholders are not personally liable.
2. Lower corporation tax offered a private limited company advantages over self-
employment in recent years. Corporation tax rates have increased from 20 per cent to 22
per cent in recent years compared with the sole trader basic rate tax which was reduced
from 22 per cent to 20 per cent in 2008. Incorporation still has tax saving advantages
dependent upon the net taxable profit.
[Type text] Page 42

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
3. Sole trader basic accounts can be quite simple as a formal accounting system is not
required and can be reduced to simple lists of income and expenditure supported by
documentary evidence of sales and purchase invoices, effectively single entry
bookkeeping. Producing a balance sheet is optional. Due to the simplicity then an
accountant may not be required saving a significant cost but is the normal approach and
offsets some of the tax advantages.
4. A private limited company advantages over self-employment also extends to long term
finance. Companies retain more funds within the business to meet future financial
commitments which promote business growth, a more sustainable business and medium
term profits growth over a sole trader.
DISADVANTAGES OF PRIVAYE LIMITED COMPANIES
1. Many private limited companies are very profitable. Unfortunately, these profits can
become diluted because they must be evenly distributed among all shareholders, and
many PLC’s have up to 50 shareholders.
2. Registered directors of PLC’s must maintain impeccable records of profits and losses for
about seven years and are used to complete the corporation’s tax returns every year.
PLC’s must also pay taxes and insurances for their employees.
3. Shareholders in a PLC’s are not able to sell or transfer their shares to the general public
and also cannot trade them to any stock exchange.
4. Even though shares in a PLC cannot be publicly traded, information concerning the
company is made public.
[Type text] Page 43

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
PUBLIC COMPANIES
A limited company grants limited liability to its owners and management. Being a public
company allows a firm to sell shares to investors this is beneficial in raising capital. Only Public
Limited Companies may be listed on the London Stock Exchange and will have the suffix PLC
on their ticker symbol. Other requirements include: It must be registered as a public company; it
must have at 5 lakhs of authorized share capital.
NAME OF SOME PUBLIC COMPANIES
1. OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
2. NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION
3. BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED
4. BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIOMITED
ADVANTAGES OF A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
1. .It is able to raise funds and capital through the sale of its securities. This is the reason
why public corporations are so important, historically; prior to their existence, it was very
difficult to obtain large amounts of capital for private enterprises.
2. Securities from a public company typically have an established fair market value at any
given time as determined by the price the security is sold for on the stock exchange where
the security is traded.
3. In addition to being able to easily raise capital, publicly traded companies may issue their
securities as compensation for those that provide services to the company, such as their
directors, officers, and employees.
[Type text] Page 44

AND PRIVATE COMPANY
DISADVANTAGES OF A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
1. It has to meet the requirement to publicly disclose much financial information; such
information could be useful to competitors.
2. Publicly traded companies are also required to spend more for certified public
accountants and other bureaucratic paperwork required of all publicly traded companies
under government regulations.
[Type text] Page 45

Special Contract Act

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Special Contract Act

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Special Contract Act

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LAW ASSIGNMENT ON

[Type text] Page 2

[Type text] Page 3

1. A contract of Guarantee may be oral or in writing (section 126), though a creditor

1) Specific Guarantee: It is a type of Guarantee which is intended on a particular debt and

2) Continuing Guarantee: When a guarantee extends to a series of transactions.

[Type text] Page 4

A guarantee regarding the conduct of another is a continuing guarantee, unlike specific

RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CREDITOR

RIGHTS: The rights of a creditor are:

[Type text] Page 5

Example: A banker contracts to lend X Rs.5000 on March 4.A guarantees repayment.

It can be classified under three heads:

[Type text] Page 6

2) Rights against the principal debtor:

3) Rights against co-sureties:

LIABILITIES OF SURETY (SECTION 128)

Example: A guarantees to B the payment of a bill of exchange by C, the acceptor. The

[Type text] Page 7

POSITION OF SURETY IN CASE OF A MINOR DEBTOR

2) By variance in terms of contract (Section 133): Any variance, made without

3) By release of discharge of principal debtor (Section 134): The surety is

[Type text] Page 8

which the principal debtor is released, or by any act or omission of the

4) By compounding with, or giving time to, or agreeing not to sue, principal

Example: C, the holder of an overdue bill of exchange drawn by A as surety

[Type text] Page 9

[Type text] Page 11

RIGHT OF THE INDEMNIFIED (i.e. THE INDEMNITY HOLDER)

COMMENCEMENT OF INDEMNIFIER’S LIABILITY

[Type text] Page 12

DISSIMILARITY BETWEEN CONTRACT OF GUARANTEE AND CONTRACT OF

1. The liability of a promisor is primary and independent in a contract of indemnity. In a

[Type text] Page 13

[Type text] Page 14

DEFINITION (SECTION 148)

[Type text] Page 15

[Type text] Page 16

4. Ownership of goods: In bailment, it is only the possession of goods which is transferred

Bailment is classified into six categories:

[Type text] Page 17

DUTIES AND RIGHTS OF BAILOR AND BAILEE

[Type text] Page 18

3. To bear expense in case of gratuitous bailment’s: Concerning bailment under which

[Type text] Page 19

[Type text] Page 20

1. A bailee can sue a bailor for certain things which are:

[Type text] Page 21

c. Any extraordinary expenses.

[Type text] Page 22

3. Right against wrongful deprivation of or injury to goods: If a third person wrongfully

A contract of bailment terminates or comes to an end under the following circumstances:

[Type text] Page 23

[Type text] Page 24

A pledge is a bailment of goods as security for payment of debt or performance of a promise

[Type text] Page 26

WHO MAY PLEDGE?

[Type text] Page 27

(1)PLEDGE OF GOODS BY MERCHANTILE AGENTS: If a mercantile agent is in

(2)PLEDGE WHERE PAWNOR HAS LIMITED INTERESTS IN GOODS: Where a