Design of Four Quadrant Bipolar Multiplier by Manraj Singh Gujral
Design of Four Quadrant Bipolar Multiplier by Manraj Singh Gujral
Design of Four Quadrant Bipolar Multiplier by Manraj Singh Gujral
1
therefore, ∆ = −
∆ = (
−
) (3)
Fig. 4 Block Diagram for Logarithmic Multiplier [1]
=
(2)
( )
2
As we can observe from the waveform, figure 12, that this
particular multiplier is basically a two-quadrant multiplier. All
the output values for the multiplier remain at 0V for any
voltages of V5 < 0.
Fig. 10 Long Tail DC sweep waveform Fig. 12 Waveform analysis for voltage sweep for V5 from -5 to +5
As seen from the wave in figure 10 the voltage (V5) has to The Voltage V5 has to be positive at all times since the IEE ,
be positive (1V to 5V). As from the waveform we can see the seen in figure 8, has to flow in order for the LTP to function.
central point when input voltage is 1 V, i.e. when V1 = V2 the This causes further restrictions on its usage. Therefore we will
differential voltage output is zero. Also the curve stays linear use this principle of a cross coupled Long Tailed Pair to
for very small range of differential input voltage (v4-v3) in the modify the current circuit and use it in all four quadrants.
range of +/- 0.6V. And beyond that the output voltage is
ANALYSIS OF GILBERT MULTIPLIER
saturated at fixed level.
Analysing a random output wave, say at V5=4, the output Barry Gilbert in 1967 had invented an Analog multiplier,
differential voltage / 6.1V and is constant for any change in which is now known as the Gilbert Cell, or the Gilbert mixer
the input. In the liner range, when V3 in in the range 0.96V to [3]. A basic structure of a Gilbert Cell is two Long Tailed
1.04V, we can assume the value of K is constant we can Pair connected in series with one half of other long tailed pair
therefore generate a multiplier with the equation as mentioned as shown in the figure 13
in the Introduction
Vo=K.Vx.Vy
We can adjust the factor K by varying the tail current or the
resistances values R1 and R2. In a practical circuit, however,
it is prudent to have a voltage controlled reference that a
variable resistor which we will use later in this report.
Now we perform a large signal analysis on the same circuit
and a voltage sweep for both negative and positive values of
input voltage V5. From -5 to +5 in steps of 1. The circuit is
shown in figure 10
3
,
IL1 IL2 ,4 = ,
;1 + (< ⁄<% ) >;1 + (<⁄<%) >
,
I c3 I c4 I c5 I c6
,6 = ,
+ Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
;1 + (<⁄<%) >;1 + (<⁄<%) >
,
v1
_
,7 =
I c1 I c2 ;1 + (<⁄<%) >;1 + (<⁄<%) >
(11)
+ Q5 Q6 Assuming the Change in collector currents as
v2
_ ∆ = ? − ? = (,0 + ,6 ) − (,4 + ,7 )
IEE
= (,0 − ,7 ) + (,6 + ,4 )
and substituting the values of individual collector currents
from Eqn. (11) we get,
1 1 1
Fig. 13 The basic structure of the Gilbert Cell ∆ = @A − BC @A
1+ < ⁄<% 1+ < ⁄<% 1 + <⁄<%
To understand the basic operation, consider V2 as reference 1
− BC
1 + <⁄<%
and V1 as input. If V1 is a positive voltage and large enough
that transistor Q1 and Q4 are powered on and Q2 and Q3 are
<2 <9
therefore powered off. Therefore as is the case in a standard =D ∆ = tanh ( )tanh ( ) (12)[5]
differential amplifier, < <
(a) Q5 is connected to IL1 load line, and
(b) Q6 is connected to IL2 load line. This Eqn. (12) forms the equation of Gilbert Cell where the
Whereas, if the input voltage is a negative voltage large output is the product of hyperbolic tangents of the input
enough to power on Q2 & Q3, and hence, power off Q1 and voltages.
Q4 then we have We use the same concept in out circuit realization as shown
(c) Q5 is connected to IL2 load line , and in figure 14. Instead of the Current source IEE, we employ a
(d) Q6 is connected to IL1 load line. current mirror controlled by a voltage reference. Note that Q5
Which is also the standard differential amplifier, but with and Q6 now act as separate arms for the current to flow for V3
negative polarity. [4] to be negative and positive respectively. Transistor Q5 , in
Theoretically it should work for both the negative and figure 14, is responsible for the flow of current labelled as Ic1
positive values of the input and output giving us the four in figure 13 when the V3 is positive. Transistor Q6, in figure
quadrant operation. We will now look at the mathematical 14, is responsible for flow of current Ic2 when V3 becomes
derivation of the output and later simulate and see the results negative. Actual biasing of the transistors needs to be
to prove it works. appropriate since a negative differential voltage effectively
As in Eqn. (4), here we have two voltage controlling the means that one of the transistors, say Q5, is active during the
output namely v1 and v2. positive voltage cycle and therefore Q6 in negative voltage
cycle since it sees a positive potential w.r.t. Q5.
In the figure 13 , we have
, ,
,0 = 12 , ,4 = 12 (8)
1 + (1) 1 + (1)
and,
, ,
,6 = 12 , ,7 = 12 (9)
( )
1+ 1 1 + (1)
, ,
, = 19 , , = 19 (10)
( )
1+ 1 1 + (1)
4
(b)
Fig. 16 Two cross coupled LTP waveform, with Ic(Q7) = 6.25 mA. (a) Circuit
with V4=4V, (b) Resulting waveform and Ic(Q7
5
Fig. 18 Low cost analog multiplier AD633, 8-Lead Plastic DIP (N) Package
Also, instead of a differential output, we could employ the Consider a simple Common Emitter configuration:
circuit for a single ended output using current mirrors. Vcc
Therefore, implementing a differential voltage input and using
Rc
emitter degeneration in place of Q7 & Q8 we get the
following characteristics as shown in figure 19. Ic
Rb
Vb
Vb
Re
6
Z2 !2
(a) The single ended output is nothing but two ∆" 2"% tanh Y [ (20)
current mirrors trying to balance each other and P
Substituting Eqn. 20 in Eqn.12 we get ,
G G
the differential current flowing through the Load
∆ tanh A B tanh A B D
2G% 2G%
resistor. Addition of a differential-to-single-
ended converter adds a parameter in the circuit
Z ! Z !
as ∆ Y 2 2 [ Y 9 9 [ (21)[6]
P OP
"(MN = ∆ . ' (15)[6] This makes it linear to the Input voltage rather than
hyperbolic tangential.
Where K is dependent on the load resistance and the
voltage controlled current source in the differential-to-single Our specification is to meet a specification of +/- 10 V
ended converter. Output for an Input range of +/-5V with flexibility of
(b) Since differential voltage-to-current converter controlling the tail current in the cross connected LTPs.
with input V2 is responsible for the tail currents Using Eqn.15, 16 & 17 to vary the circuit parameters, such
in the cross coupled LTP, it has an important as the input and output resistances; the tail current settings;
role in output where and the differential voltage V3 controlling the tail currents of
!
"(MN ∝ 9 (16) cross coupled LTP in figure 18 is modified to get the desired
OP
The Ieo current in Eqn.(16) can be seen in our simulated output.
circuit, figure 19(a), as the degenerated emitter current source
as, I3 & I4
(c) Similarly, the differential voltage-to-current
converter with input V2 is the main input signal
which controls the LTP pair transistors.
Therefore addition of this converter has an effect
on the output as
!2
"(MN ∝ (17)
QRRPR STRROUV
The Imirror current in Eqn.(16) can be seen in our simulated
circuit, figure 19(a), as the degenerated current source as, I1 &
I2. Practically the purpose of this differential voltage-to-
current converter is to introduce an inverse hyperbolic (a)
Tangent voltage to cancel the effect of the Gilbert Cell’s
equation given in Eqn. (12).
Vcc
∆V
I1 I2
+ Differential voltage-to-
v1 (b)
_ current converter
Fig. 23 Analysing the output by varying circuit parameter R2
Fig. 22 Inverse hyperbolic tangent circuit [6]
(a) Replacing the resistance R2 from 5k to 10k (b) Resulting output
The differential voltage source produces a current in waveform V(output) vs. Input voltage, V4
addition to the I1 and I2 shown in the figure 21. The currents
Figure 22 shows the response of the circuit when we vary
are hence given by,
the resistance R2 from its set value of the circuit (shown in
= ( + ' " , and = ( − ' " (18)
after Figure 25). The output swing is restricted to +/- 5V from
Here Io is the current when V1= 0V, and K1 is the factor
+/- 10V proving the output is inversely proportional to the
introduced by the voltage-to-converter.
Therefore, the differential voltage ∆" is given by,
input degenerated resistor.
( ' " ( ' "
∆" "% ln A B "% ln A B
X X
Z !
"% ln Y P 2 2 [ (19)
P Z2 !2
Using, tanh
ln Y [
We have,
7
(b)
Fig. 25 Analysing the output by varying circuit parameter R5
(a) (a) Replacing the resistance R5 from 5k to 10k (b) Resulting output
waveform V(output) vs. Input voltage, V4
(b)
Fig. 24 Analysing the output by varying circuit parameter R4
(a) Replacing the resistance R4 from 1.8 to 3.65k (b) Resulting output
waveform V(output) vs. Input voltage, V4
(b)
Fig. 26 Gilbert Cell with adjusted circuit parameters. (a) Circuit diagram, (b)
Resulting output waveform V(output) vs. Input voltage, V4
(a) The final required output is obtained in Figure 25, for input
voltage swing of +/-5V the output ranges from +/- 10V. the
circuit also has a voltage controlled Tail current controller , as
V3, in the circuit which can adjust the multiplication factor.
Gilbert Cell described so far has been BJT based, the same
model can be developed for a MOS based Cell as well.
8
voltages as was the case with bipolar based multiplier, rather
it is a linear and directly proportional to the inputs