Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 67 views

    ERLANG

    Uploaded by

    tarunchauhan25
    The document compares the capacity of mobile sites using AMR-HR and GSM-HR technologies. It shows the additional capacity provided by each vendor for different configurations of transceivers (TRX), traffic channels (TCH), and enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE) channels. Configurations with more TRX, fewer blocked TCH, and 3 sectors provide the highest capacity per site, with ZTE & Alcatel providing higher capacity compared to Motorola in most cases for AMR-HR and Motorola providing higher capacity for GSM-HR.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    ERLANG

    Uploaded by

    tarunchauhan25
    67 views1 page
    The document compares the capacity of mobile sites using AMR-HR and GSM-HR technologies. It shows the additional capacity provided by each vendor for different configurations of transceivers (TRX), traffic channels (TCH), and enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE) channels. Configurations with more TRX, fewer blocked TCH, and 3 sectors provide the highest capacity per site, with ZTE & Alcatel providing higher capacity compared to Motorola in most cases for AMR-HR and Motorola providing higher capacity for GSM-HR.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document compares the capacity of mobile sites using AMR-HR and GSM-HR technologies. It shows the additional capacity provided by each vendor for different configurations of transceivers (TRX), traffic channels (TCH), and enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE) channels. Configurations with more TRX, fewer blocked TCH, and 3 sectors provide the highest capacity per site, with ZTE & Alcatel providing higher capacity compared to Motorola in most cases for AMR-HR and Motorola providing higher capacity for GSM-HR.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    67 views1 page

    ERLANG

    Uploaded by

    tarunchauhan25
    The document compares the capacity of mobile sites using AMR-HR and GSM-HR technologies. It shows the additional capacity provided by each vendor for different configurations of transceivers (TRX), traffic channels (TCH), and enhanced data rates for GSM evolution (EDGE) channels. Configurations with more TRX, fewer blocked TCH, and 3 sectors provide the highest capacity per site, with ZTE & Alcatel providing higher capacity compared to Motorola in most cases for AMR-HR and Motorola providing higher capacity for GSM-HR.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as XLS, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xls, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    CAPACITY WITH AMR-HR

    NO. of EDGE Additional


    NO. of NO. of
    NO. of TRX No. of TS (2 TCH No. of Capacity Capacity Capacity of Site
    SDCCH BCCH Vendor
    in a sector Channel Blocked in TCH in Er. with 45% with 3 sectors
    Channel Channel
    Motorola) AMR-HR

    4 32 2 1 2 27 19.26 27.93 83.80 ZTE & Alcatel


    4 32 2 1 4 25 17.50 25.38 76.14 Motorola
    3 24 2 1 2 19 12.33 17.88 53.65 ZTE & Alcatel
    3 24 2 1 4 17 10.66 15.45 46.35 Motorola
    2 16 1 1 2 12 6.61 9.59 28.77 ZTE & Alcatel
    2 16 1 1 4 10 5.08 7.37 22.11 Motorola
    1 8 1 1 2 4 1.09 1.58 4.75 ZTE & Alcatel
    1 8 1 1 4 2 0.22 0.32 0.97 Motorola

    CAPACITY WITH GSM-HR


    NO. of EDGE
    HR NO. of NO. of Capacity of
    NO. of TRX TS (2 TCH No. of Capacity
    enable SDCCH BCCH Site with 3 Vendor
    in a sector Blocked in TCH in Er.
    TRX Channel Channel sectors
    Motorola)

    4 3 2 1 2 51 41.19 123.57 ZTE & Alcatel


    4 2 2 1 2 43 33.76 101.27 ZTE & Alcatel
    4 1 2 1 2 35 26.43 79.30 ZTE & Alcatel
    4 3 2 1 4 47 37.46 112.38 Motorola
    4 2 2 1 4 39 30.08 90.24 Motorola
    4 1 2 1 4 31 22.83 68.48 Motorola
    3 2 2 1 2 35 26.43 79.30 ZTE & Alcatel
    3 1 2 1 2 27 19.26 57.79 ZTE & Alcatel
    3 2 2 1 4 31 22.83 68.48 Motorola
    3 1 2 1 4 23 15.76 47.28 Motorola
    2 1 1 1 2 20 13.18 39.54 ZTE & Alcatel
    2 1 1 1 4 16 9.83 29.48 Motorola

    You might also like