Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 128 views

    Facts:: HUNG-MAN-YOC, in The Name of KWONG-WO-SING, Plaintiff-Appellee, KIENG-CHIONG-SENG, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants

    Uploaded by

    Xandee Teh Kuizon
    The document discusses a legal case regarding a partnership called KiengChiong-Seng. It summarizes that the partnership was formed by three individuals to engage in commercial pursuits. However, the partnership was not properly organized or registered as required by law. Therefore, while the partnership existed in practice, it did not have legal status. As such, any obligations or contracts entered into by the partnership could not be enforced against the partnership directly. However, someone would still be liable for obligations incurred on behalf of the partnership.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Facts:: HUNG-MAN-YOC, in The Name of KWONG-WO-SING, Plaintiff-Appellee, KIENG-CHIONG-SENG, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants

    Uploaded by

    Xandee Teh Kuizon
    128 views1 page
    The document discusses a legal case regarding a partnership called KiengChiong-Seng. It summarizes that the partnership was formed by three individuals to engage in commercial pursuits. However, the partnership was not properly organized or registered as required by law. Therefore, while the partnership existed in practice, it did not have legal status. As such, any obligations or contracts entered into by the partnership could not be enforced against the partnership directly. However, someone would still be liable for obligations incurred on behalf of the partnership.

    Original Title

    1

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses a legal case regarding a partnership called KiengChiong-Seng. It summarizes that the partnership was formed by three individuals to engage in commercial pursuits. However, the partnership was not properly organized or registered as required by law. Therefore, while the partnership existed in practice, it did not have legal status. As such, any obligations or contracts entered into by the partnership could not be enforced against the partnership directly. However, someone would still be liable for obligations incurred on behalf of the partnership.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    128 views1 page

    Facts:: HUNG-MAN-YOC, in The Name of KWONG-WO-SING, Plaintiff-Appellee, KIENG-CHIONG-SENG, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants

    Uploaded by

    Xandee Teh Kuizon
    The document discusses a legal case regarding a partnership called KiengChiong-Seng. It summarizes that the partnership was formed by three individuals to engage in commercial pursuits. However, the partnership was not properly organized or registered as required by law. Therefore, while the partnership existed in practice, it did not have legal status. As such, any obligations or contracts entered into by the partnership could not be enforced against the partnership directly. However, someone would still be liable for obligations incurred on behalf of the partnership.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    G.R. No. L-2888 HUNG-MAN-YOC, in the name of KWONG-WO-SING, plaintiff-appellee, vs. KIENG-CHIONG-SENG, ET AL., defendants-appellants.

    FACTS: Chu-Che-Co, Yu-Yec-Pin, and Ang-Chu-Keng were partners of Kiong-Tiao-Eng, under the firm name of KiengChiong-Seng. It has been not proved that Kieng-Chiong-Seng was the firm name, but rather the designation of the partnership. Alleged by the plaintiff and appellee, the partnership of Kieng-Chiong-Seng was a mercantile partnership organized for the purpose of engaging in commercial pursuits, although such organization was not evidenced by any public document as required by article 119 of the Code of Commerce, nor was it registered as required by article 17 of the said code. HELD: The partnership in question was a mercantile one, as it was engaged in the importation of goods for sale here at a profit. But its organization is not evidenced by any public document. All this being so, the alleged partnership never had any legal existence nor has it acquired any judicial personality in the acts and contracts executed and made by it. But as the said partnership was a partnership de facto, although it had no legal standing, and contracted obligations in favor of the plaintiff, the liability arising from such obligations must enforcible against some one.

    You might also like