Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 67 views

    To Whom It May Concern

    Uploaded by

    api-3745637
    A writ petition was filed in the Lahore High Court against the deduction of income tax from voluntary hand-shake benefits. The court issued a restrictive order stating that the tax deduction from the petitioner's account should not be deposited with the Income Tax Department until a hearing on an early date. The order references a prior Supreme Court decision from 2001. The document confirms Mr. Muhammad Ibrahim Khalil as the petitioner in the case and is intended to inform relevant parties of the court action.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    To Whom It May Concern

    Uploaded by

    api-3745637
    67 views1 page
    A writ petition was filed in the Lahore High Court against the deduction of income tax from voluntary hand-shake benefits. The court issued a restrictive order stating that the tax deduction from the petitioner's account should not be deposited with the Income Tax Department until a hearing on an early date. The order references a prior Supreme Court decision from 2001. The document confirms Mr. Muhammad Ibrahim Khalil as the petitioner in the case and is intended to inform relevant parties of the court action.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    A writ petition was filed in the Lahore High Court against the deduction of income tax from voluntary hand-shake benefits. The court issued a restrictive order stating that the tax deduction from the petitioner's account should not be deposited with the Income Tax Department until a hearing on an early date. The order references a prior Supreme Court decision from 2001. The document confirms Mr. Muhammad Ibrahim Khalil as the petitioner in the case and is intended to inform relevant parties of the court action.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    67 views1 page

    To Whom It May Concern

    Uploaded by

    api-3745637
    A writ petition was filed in the Lahore High Court against the deduction of income tax from voluntary hand-shake benefits. The court issued a restrictive order stating that the tax deduction from the petitioner's account should not be deposited with the Income Tax Department until a hearing on an early date. The order references a prior Supreme Court decision from 2001. The document confirms Mr. Muhammad Ibrahim Khalil as the petitioner in the case and is intended to inform relevant parties of the court action.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as doc, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    To whom it may concern.

    Certified that a writ petition No. 4447/2002 titled Liaqat Ali


    Gorchani etc. Vs. Govt. of Pakistan etc. was filed in the Hon’ble High
    Court, Lahore, Bench Multan, against the income tax deduction from the
    voluntary Hand-Shake benefits on 6.6.2002. The said petition was placed
    before His Lordship Mr. Justice Muhammad Khalid Alvi for preliminary
    hearing on 7.6.2002. The Hon’ble Court was pleased to pass a restrictive
    order as under: -
    Sh. Muhammad Faheem Advocate
    i) Issue pre-admission notice to the respondent for
    14.6.2002.
    C.M. No. 2/2002
    ii) With reference to an order passed by Hon’ble
    Supreme Court dated 31.12.2001 in C.P. No. 4085/2001, it is
    submitted that the tax deduction from the account of the
    petitioner may not be deposited in the account of Income
    Tax Department. Order accordingly subject to notice for an
    early date.

    Muhammad Khalid Alvi, J.

    1. Mr. Muhammad Ibrahim Khalil Ex-Guard, N.B.P. Jam Pur, is a


    petitioner in the above-mentioned petition.
    2. It is for intimation and further necessary action for the concerned
    quarters.

    You might also like