16 Mapping
16 Mapping
16 Mapping
At some point in a cloning project it will be necessary to construct a restriction map of a plasmid. This will involve manipulating restriction digest fragments into a circular map. Once you have done this a number of times and develop a feel for the process, mapping will be almost intuitive. However, there is a systematic approach to constructing a map, which is illustrated in the sample problem below. Once you have mastered the sample problem, complete the remaining problems, plot the answers on polar coordinate graph paper, and hand them in. Be cautioned that working with actual restriction fragments from a gel is a bit messier than these problems because of experimental error in determining fragment sizes. Sometimes the mathematical approach used here needs to be supplemented with some logic.
Sample Problem Plasmid pRIT450 is 7.0 kb in length and has single Pst I, Eco R I, and Bam H I sites. You have cut the plasmid with PstI and inserted a 4.0 kb fragment into the site. From the data below, determine the restriction map of the resulting plasmid.
Solution to Sample Problem 1. If the new plasmid is cut with Pst I, the vector and the insert will regenerated. We will use these as reference fragments as we build the map. Although it is convenient to think in terms of target and vector, any site can arbitrarily be used to generate reference fragments. We will now arbitrarily begin by choosing Pst I as our reference point, but we could have just as easily chosen to start with Eco R I or Bam H I. It makes no difference. First, look at the Pst I + Bam H I digest. It helps to think of the double digest conceptually as a two-step process in which the plasmid is first cut by Pst I into the two reference fragments. Bam H I then cuts the reference fragments further.
2.
31
Restriction Mapping 3. In the Pst I + Bam H I double digest, we recover 4 fragments. Some combination of the fragments will add up to the vector and the remaining fragments will equal the insert. We see that 6.1+ 0.9 = 7.0 = vector and 2.8 + 2.1 = 4.0 = insert. Thus, we can organize the fragments as below: P 6.1 7.0 Ref 4. B 0.9 P P 1.2 B 2.8 4.0 Ref P
The insert can be placed into the vector in two opposite orientations relative to the vector. We will arbitrarily one orientation for the vector and vary the insert. It we tried to vary both vector and insert, we would end up with identical maps, but in mirror image. There is, however, no absolutely correct orientation of a plasmid map, so it really makes no difference: P 6.1 7.0 Ref B 0.9 P P 1.2 B 2.8 4.0 Ref B 2.8 4.0 Ref 1.2 P Orientation B P Orientation A
5.
We next must next determine which orientation, A or B, is correct. In orientation A, the two BamHI sites are close together (proximal) while in B, the sites are far apart (distal). Clearly, a BamHI single digest of each orientation will result in a different set of fragments and we can therefore determine expected fragment sizes for each orientation and then compare our expected values with the values observed: Orientation A + 1.2 = + 2.8 = Orientation B + 2.8 = + 1.2 = Observed 2.1 8.9 11.0
0.9 6.1
0.9 6.1
6.
By comparing our observed and expected values, we find that orientation A is the correct orientation. Using exactly the same logic, we can now show that the correct orientation of the EcoRI sites is as below:
7.
P 4.3
P 0.7
32
Restriction Mapping 8. To complete the map, we must now superimpose the Bam H I and Eco R I maps. Let us arbitrarily assume that the orientation of the Bam H I map is correct. We can now superimpose the Eco R I map on the Bam H I map in either of two orientations, A or B. Using the alternate Bam H I orientation would simply produce a mirror-image map.
P E 2.7 3.3 E 1.8 0.9 1.2 B P
A
4.3 B 0.9 P 1.2 2.8 0.7 E P B P E 0.7 P 4.3 2.7 E P E 3.3 3.4 0.9 0.7 B 4.3 0.7
B 2.1 E P
6.1
P E 0.5
B
2.8 2.7 P
9.
From the alternative orientations, A and B, we can predict the outcome of an Eco R I + Bam H I double digest:
10.
By comparing the results of the Eco R I + Bam H I double digest with our predictions, we see that orientation A is correct and the plasmid is now mapped. In step 8, we arbitrarily chose one of the two possible orientations for the Bam H I map. Using the other, as noted, would have given the mirror image. Try it. Neither mirror image is more correct than the other. However, once the map is published, then, by convention, the one orientation published would then
33
Restriction Mapping become the correct version. If the plasmid was meant to be a new cloning vector, then one would map all plasmids subsequently derived from it in the same orientation. 11. The final step is to plot the map on polar coordinate graph paper. On polar coordinate graph paper, you plot degrees. Thus an entire circle, irrespective of total kilobases, will be 360o. Since the map in this case is 11 kb long, then: 360o/11kb = 32.7o/kilobase. Now we multiply each kb value by 32.7 to obtain the degrees below: kilobases 1.2 2.1 0.7 4.3 1.8 0.9 11.0 degrees 39.2 68.7 22.9 140.6 58.9 29.4 359.9
The last step is to decide on the circumference of the circle. If you are mapping several plasmids, you would want to draw them to scale. You can adjust the total size of your map by altering the circumference. Thus, for example, if you wanted to draw your map to the scale of 1 inch = 1 kb, then circumference = 11 kb x 1 inch/kb = 11 inches. You can determine the radius of a circle with a circumference of 11 inches by applying the formula: 2r=C where C = circumference and r = radius, and solving for r: 2 r = 11 in r = 11 in/2 r = 1.75 in The map of the sample plasmid on the following page is graphed in just this way. The position of the restriction sites are plotted according to the table above and the circumference of the outer circle is 11 inches, with a radius of 1.75 inches.
34
Restriction Mapping
12.
Now, determine the restriction maps for the remaining plasmids and hand them in as homework.
35
Plasmid pRIT451 was cut with Sma I, Bgl II, and Ava I. From the data below, determine the map.
4.3 2.0 4.9 2.8 2.6 2.1 1.5 2.3 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.8
Plasmid pRIT452 was cut with Pst I, Hin d III, and Eco R I. From the data below, determine the map.
Pst I Hin d III Eco R I Pst I + Hin d III Pst I + Eco R I Eco R I + Hin d III
5.9 6.2 3.5 4.2 3.8 3.5 2.0 3.0 1.8 1.7 0.5 1.2
Plasmid pRIT453 was cut with Sma I, Hin d III, and Eco R I. From the data below, determine the map.
Eco R I Hin d III Sma I Eco R I + Hin d III Eco R I + Sma I Sma I + Hin d III
1.6 1.9 2.7 1.9 2.0 2.5 1.6 0.9 2.2 1.3 0.7 1.9
36
Restriction Mapping Plasmid pRIT454 was cut with Pst I, Hin d III, and Eco R I. From the data below, determine the map.
Pst I Hin d III Eco R I Pst I + Hin d III Pst I + Eco R I Eco R I + Hin d III
5.3 5.5 3.0 3.8 3.0 3.0 1.8 2.0 2.5 1.5 1.5 1.8 1.0 0.5 0.8
Plasmid pRIT455 was cut with Bam H I, Hin d III, and Eco R I. From the data below, determine the map.
Eco R I Hin d III Bam H I Eco R I + Bam H I Eco R I + Hin d III Bam H I + Hin d III
0.5
0.5 0.5
Plasmid pRIT456 was cut with Pst I, Hin d III, and Eco R I. From the data below, determine the map.
Eco R I Pst I Hin d III Pst I + Eco R I Pst I + Hin d III Eco R I + Hin d III
2.9
0.8 1.3
37
Restriction Mapping Plasmid pRIT457 was cut with Bam H I, Hin d III, and Pst I. From the data below, determine the map.
Bam H I Hin d III Pst I Bam H I + Hin d III Bam H I + Pst I Hin d III + Pst I
3.8
2.0 1.3
0.5
38