Examiners' Report June 2011 GCE Physics 6PH05 01
Examiners' Report June 2011 GCE Physics 6PH05 01
Examiners' Report June 2011 GCE Physics 6PH05 01
Edexcel is one of the leading examining and awarding bodies in the UK and throughout the world. We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and specific programmes for employers. Through a network of UK and overseas offices, Edexcels centres receive the support they need to help them deliver their education and training programmes to learners. For further information, please call our GCE line on 0844 576 0025, our GCSE team on 0844 576 0027, or visit our website at www.edexcel.com. If you have any subject specific questions about the content of this Examiners Report that require the help of a subject specialist, you may find our Ask The Expert email service helpful. Ask The Expert can be accessed online at the following link: http://www.edexcel.com/Aboutus/contact-us/ Alternatively, you can contact our Physics Advisor directly by sending an email to Stephen Nugus on ScienceSubjectAdvisor@EdexcelExperts.co.uk You can also telephone 0844 576 0037 to speak to a member of our subject advisor team.
See your students scores for every exam question Spot topics, skills and types of question where they need to improve their learning Understand how your students performance compares with Edexcel national averages Track progress against target grades and focus revision more effectively with NEW Mock Analysis
For more information on ResultsPlus, or to log in, visit www.edexcel.com/resultsplus. To set up your ResultsPlus account, call 0844 576 0024 June 2011 Publications Code UA028550 All the material in this publication is copyright Edexcel Ltd 2011
Introduction
This is the third occasion that Unit 5 of the new specification has been examined. Once again the paper gave candidates the opportunity to demonstrate their understanding of a wide range of topics from this unit. All of the questions elicited responses across the range of marks, but the marks for Q15(c), Q17(b), and Q18(b) tended to be clustered at the lower end of the scale. Calculation and show that questions gave candidates an opportunity to demonstrate their problem solving skills to good effect. In general, good responses were seen to such questions. However, whereas the majority of candidates produced solutions that were well organised, there was evidence of poor layout in a number of scripts. Candidates should be aware that in answering numerical questions their work should be set out to enable the examiner to follow their reasoning. Candidates should also realise that they should substitute all values into an equation, as a wrong final answer with incomplete substitution in the previous steps will lead to little credit. Re-arrangement of equations was sometimes poorly attempted, leading to marks being lost. Candidates should be encouraged to substitute numerical values into an equation before attempting a re-arrangement, as this may demonstrate a correct use of the equation even if the final answer is incorrect due to poor algebra. Significant figures were a problem area for some candidates. Examples of incorrect rounding, too few significant figures used in the course of a calculation, or numbers rounded at each stage with a resulting inaccuracy in the final answer were all seen far too commonly for an examination at this level. In some questions well known quantities attracted unit errors. Candidates should be encouraged to check units carefully for all quantities that they calculate. Once again it was pleasing to see that candidates were generally able to access the correct data and equations from the list provided. However responses were seen to both Q14(b) and Q17(a)(i) in which 1/4 peo was used in place of the Boltzmann constant. Candidates need to be reminded that they should be familiar with all of the information provided in the data and equations section of the examination paper. Reasoning and explanation type questions need careful interpretation of the question and subsequent planning of the explanation or argument before the final answer stage is reached. In this way candidates may ensure that all relevant points are included in their answer in a logical sequence. The use of bullet points should be encouraged. The space allowed for responses was usually sufficient. However, candidates need to remember that the space provided does not have to be filled. If they either need more space or want to replace an answer with a different one, they should indicate clearly where that response is to be found. This year there too many instances of candidates continuing their work on another part of the paper with little indication to the examiner where the continuation work was to be found.
Question 11 (a)
Most candidates identified that the key feature of a standard candle was that its luminosity is known. The most common mistake was to state that it was an object with fixed, standard or the same luminosity. A small number of responses described the method of using the standard candle to calculate distance, or named a type of stellar object without indicating that the luminosity of the object must be known.
Examiner Comments
There is a large amount of detail included in this response, but the key idea of a known luminosity is clear.
Examiner Comments
Again this response includes a lot of detail, but the key information (that the luminosity of the object is known) is missing.
Question 11 (b)
This was generally well-answered. The most common mistake was to get the wrong units (typically either leaving the unit out completely, or to use Wm-1). In a small number of responses the distance wasnt squared.
Examiner Comments
The ux is incorrectly given the same unit as the luminosity of the star.
Examiner Tip
Check units carefully for any final answers that you calculate.
Examiner Comments
The power of ten has not been included in the final answer.
Examiner Tip
Transfer numbers carefully from your calculator display. Remember to include the full standard form value.
Question 12
(a) In the main this was well answered. However, many ignored the terminology used in the question and referred to m1 and m2 in their answers. A common mistake was to equate m with m1. (b) If a candidate lost this mark it was generally through using the wrong unit. Although it might have been expected that the units for gravitational field strength would be well known at this level, N, or N m-2, and even kg m-2 were seen. In some responses the units were omitted entirely.
Examiner Comments
It is not clear in (a) how g has been derived. m has been cancelled with either m1 or m2 which has then become m. Part (b) is correct.
Examiner Tip
When deriving a quantity, make sure that all the steps in your derivation are clear.
Examiner Comments
In part (a) the expression is correctly derived. However, in part (b) the unit for g is incorrect.
Question 13 (a)
Virtually every answer seen was correct with unit.
Examiner Comments
The equation for P is re-arranged incorrectly and so neither the substitution nor the final answer score any marks.
Substitute values into the equation before re-arranging. That way you will get the use of mark, even if you final answer is incorrect.
Examiner Tip
Examiner Comments
The response just misses the second marking point, as it doesnt state that the air molecules have an increased kinetic energy.
Examiner Comments
The candidate may know what is happening as air passes the heater, but this response is too vague to award either mark.
Ensure that your answers contain enough detail to be clear and unambiguous.
Examiner Tip
Question 14
a)(i) There were many straightforward answers using P/T is constant. However, a number of candidates tried to make this calculation much more complicated by using PV = NkT and working out V and N. Many of these went on to get the correct answer, but some gave up and did not attempt part 14b, when their use of PV=NKT would have been appropriate. It was disappointing to see some candidates failing to convert 20 oC to 293K. (a)(ii) There were many correct answers, constant mass or constant number of molecules being the most popular. The majority of other wrong answers centred around the idea that the ball was a perfect sphere. In a number of answers the assumption that air behaves as an ideal gas was identified, which was fine. However, some candidates quoted individual assumptions of the kinetic theory (e.g. collisions between molecules are perfectly elastic etc.) and such answer did not gain credit. (b) Candidates found this calculation demanding to complete. Volume calculation errors were common (powers of 10, using 4pr2 instead of 4pr3/3 or diameter instead of radius). Only a minority of candidates realised that they had to find a pressure difference; the majority found (successfully or unsuccessfully) the number of air molecules at one of the temperatures only. For those who did attempt to find the pressure difference, accuracy suffered when they calculated the numbers of molecules at the two pressures separately, rather than using the pressure difference in one calculation.
Examiner Comments
In part (ii) the assumptions made are those of the kinetic theory not an assumption required to be able to use the gas law.
10
Examiner Comments
Rounding errors have led to a final answer that is less than the actual answer.
Be careful when rounding - keep enough significant figures in your calculator memory to ensure that your final answer does not differ appreciably from the expected answer.
Examiner Tip
11
Question 15 (a)
This was a textbook definition, and was well answered by most. However, it was clear that some candidates did not realise that a standard definition was required. Answers referring to general features of a system exhibiting simple harmonic motion were seen from these candidates.
Examiner Comments
The response focuses on the isochronous nature of simple harmonic oscillators. This is not a definition of s.h.m. There is an equation included, but the symbols are not defined and so credit cannot be given for this.
If you are using an equation to define a quantity, make sure that you state what each symbol in the equation represents.
Examiner Tip
12
Question 15 (b)
This was calculated successfully by most of those who could work out the period. The most common error was in not realising that you had to halve 5cm to get the amplitude. Most candidates sensibly used the formula vmax = A . Those who brought in the sine function invariably got wrong values for vmax because they substituted inappropriate times into the equation. It was encouraging to see that many students are aware that answers to this type of question should not be left in terms of p.
Examiner Comments
13
Question 15 (c)
This question was very poorly answered. Most candidates simply ignored the reference to standing waves in the rubric. The most common way of gaining credit was to make a comment relating the length to the frequency, but many candidates did not explain that the frequency would decrease as the length was increased, and so they did not gain credit. These candidates said frequency would change when the length changed or that a different length meant a different frequency. Other incorrect approaches were to talk about mass-spring systems, the simple pendulum and resonance. Some candidates were confusing amplitude with frequency and quite a few answers assumed there was a driving frequency somewhere which would resonate with one of the rulers.
Examiner Comments
There is no reference to standing waves in this response. The physics included is inappropriate and incorrect for this context.
Examiner Tip
Check the wording of the question to find pointers for the way in which you should structure your response.
14
15
Examiner Comments
In part (a)(ii) the energy conversion is correct, but it is not clear what the rest of the calculation is about. In (b)(i) an inappropriate equation has been selected.
Examiner Comments
Examiner Tip
There is a unit error for the answer to (b) (ii), as the unit is not included.
16
Question 16 (c)
This was answered well, with most candidates writing so much about alpha radiation that they covered the marking points. Common mistakes were to talk about polonium penetrating the skin, alpha particles not penetrating the body or being stopped by a few cm of skin.
Examiner Comments
The answer includes enough about alpha radiation to gain both marks, but the unnecessary detail relating to beta and gamma radiation is a distraction and may have resulted in the candidate missing out an important aspect of alpha radiation required by the question.
Examiner Tip
Answer the queation that is on the paper - dont just write everything down that you know about a topic.
17
Examiner Comments
In (a)(iii) the candidate has used an equation for kinetic erngy, rather than the Einstein mass-energy equation. Also, the value for the speed of light is incorrect, and so the final answer would have been incorrect even if the 0.5 factor had been omitted.
Examiner Tip
Check formulae and data carefully from the list given at the back of the paper.
18
Examiner Comments
This response only says enough to gain the first marking point (extremely high temperature).
19
Examiner Comments
20
Examiner Comments
These two brief statements come close to gaining marks, but fall short due to lack of detail.
Examiner Tip
Read your answer back to check that it really is an answer to the question.
Examiner Comments
The first statement makes a comparison between fusion and fission, but the second statement does not.
21
Examiner Comments
The centripetal force is a name for the force acting towards the centre of the circular path, rather than being the origin of the force that maintains the black holes in a circular path.
Read the question carefully, so that you are sure what you are being asked to do.
Examiner Tip
22
Examiner Comments
The candidate has used Newtons 2nd law to equate the expression for the gravitational force to that for the centripetal force. This is incorrect, as the value of r is different for each of these. If the candidate had used the value of the gravitational force from (a)(ii), then they would not have made this error.
A quantity that you calculate in one part of a question is often used in a subsequent part. This is often the case in a question in which there is a show that calculation.
Examiner Tip
23
Examiner Comments
The response refers to a shift in the wavelength, but it isnt clear what this means in terms of the value of the wavelength.
24
Examiner Comments
This response includes half of the answer - that the binary sytem is moving away from us - but omits making a comparison with this effect and the rotation of the black holes within the binary system.
25
Examiner Comments
The candidate has written down all of the information needed to obtain a correct answer, but jumbled it up in one big incorrect substitution.
Work out quantities one by one before making a substitution to calculate a final answer.
Examiner Tip
26
Grade Boundaries
Grade boundaries for this, and all other papers, can be found on the website on this link: http://www.edexcel.com/iwantto/Pages/grade-boundaries.aspx
27
Further copies of this publication are available from Edexcel Publications, Adamsway, Mansfield, Notts, NG18 4FN Telephone 01623 467467 Fax 01623 450481 Email publication.orders@edexcel.com Order Code UA028550 June 2011 For more information on Edexcel qualifications, please visit www.edexcel.com/quals Pearson Education Limited. Registered company number 872828 with its registered office at Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex CM20 2JE