Simplifying The Migration To 4G Networks: White Paper
Simplifying The Migration To 4G Networks: White Paper
Simplifying The Migration To 4G Networks: White Paper
WhITE PAPEr
Core network solution that optimizes backhaul Converged mobility and policy management
so operators can choose any access technology without a complete overhaul of existing IP core or IP core overlay
ver the past two decades, the way people communicate, stay informed,
and are entertained has changed dramatically. There have been two major technologies driving this change: the Internet and mobile wireless communication. We have grown accustomed to the wealth of information available through the Internet and the mobility provided with wireless communications. Now these two forces are merging to enable the mobile Internet. With this convergence, mobile data services have grown significantly each year.
However, people have a certain expectation for their Internet experience that the mobile wireless environment has not fully met since the speed at which they can access their services has been limited. Mobile operators realize if they are to succeed in todays communications landscape, they must address the quality of experience for their users. As a result, they are deploying broadband network technologies, such as 3G or third generation and enhanced 3G, including UMTS, HSPA, and CDMA2000 1xEV-DO Rev A. Going forward, mobile operators will continue to evolve their networks to improve the user experience and service opportunities. One such evolutionary technology is the 3GPP Long Term Evolution (LTE) specification. Designated as a 4G or fourth generation mobile specification, LTE is designed to provide multi-megabit bandwidth, more efficient use of the radio network, latency reduction, and improved mobility. This combination aims to enhance the subscribers interaction with the network and further drive the demand for mobile multimedia services. With wireless broadband, people will more readily access their Internet services, such as on-line television, blogging, social networking, and interactive gamingall on the go. Changes in mobile communications have always been evolutionary, and the deployment of LTE will be the same. It will be a transition from 3G to 4G over a period of several years, as is the case still with the transition from 2G to 3G. As a result, mobile operators must look for strategies and solutions that will enhance their existing 3G networks, while addressing their 4G deployment requirements without requiring a forklift upgrade. Specifically, mobile operators need the multimedia core network to be readily upgradeable to the requirements of another 4G architecture called Systems Architecture Evolution (SAE).
Solutions already deployed in the market may include many of the elements required of the 4G network, including integrated intelligence, simplified network architecture, high bandwidth performance capabilities, and enhanced mobility. In order to avoid a costly replacement of the existing systems, only solutions capable of supporting multiple functions in a single node through a software upgrade will protect todays investment for tomorrows network.
Page 2
GSM
WCDMA
HSPA
LTE
Integration of intelligence at the access edgeAs a greater variety of services and user types cross the mobile network, it is critical to have greater network and subscriber intelligence. Through this intelligence, including Quality of Service (QoS) and policy enforcement, mobile operators will better understand individual users and their transactions and be able to shape the service experience and optimize network efficiency. Simplified network topologyIn order to effectively deliver the enhanced performance of LTE, the network will need to be simplified and flattened with a reduction of elements involved in data processing and transport. Optimized backhaulWith the introduction of 4G, the transport backhaul is a key consideration that many are realizing after the fact. It is very important to deploy a core network solution that is flexible enough to offer smooth migration from centralized (longer backhaul) to distributed (shorter backhaul) core network nodes. Converged mobility and policyMaintaining the subscriber session is an important consideration during 4G to 2G/3G mobility events. Additionally, unified policy management in the network is very important to perform efficient service delivery over mixed 4G and 2G/3G networks. Due to these considerations, it is important to deploy a core network based on a single mobility and policy control paradigm. Increased performance characteristicsClearly the intent of LTE is to improve the performance and efficiency of the network. In order to realize the full potential of LTE, it will be critical to deploy core solutions that can meet the
demands generated by increased mobile multimedia services and a growing subscriber base, including increased network capacity requirements, thousands of call transactions per second, and significant throughput.
2G/3G to 4G migrationAs mobile operators migrate their networks to LTE, they will look to minimize cost and maximize subscriber usage. This will require core solutions that can address 2G/3G network requirements, while at the same time be utilized for 4G network introductions. Operators will want to avoid a forklift upgrade, while deploying best-of-breed solutions based on open standards. Additionally, mobile users will expect a uniform service experience across both networks, with consideration to the bandwidth differences. According to the UMTS Forum, there is consensus in the industry that the first commercial launch of an LTE network and initial availability is expected to begin in 2010, with associated revenue to occur the following year.1 While it is likely the evolution to 4G technologies will take many years, it is imperative for mobile operators to identify multimedia core elements now that will most effectively migrate them to a 4G network in the future. Solutions designed for the specific requirements of the next generation multimedia core network include the ability to support both 2G/3G and 4G functionality in a single platform and provide major benefits to mobile operators that want to smoothly migrate their networks, maximize their investments, and offer an exceptional experience to their customers.
1. UMTS Forum white paper: Towards Global Mobile Broadband: Standardizing the future of mobile communications with LTE (Long Term Evolution), February 2008
Page 3
BTS
NodeB
UTRAN
As mobile operators evolve to LTE they will benefit from solutions that can integrate 2G/3G and 4G functions in a single node, providing separate access through a common multimedia core.
Internet
defining organizations. The basis of this convergence is the use of an IETF defined mobility management protocol such as Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6). If an operator wants to deploy any access technology with an EPC, a single mobility management protocol, such as PMIPv6 is all they need. This is a significant step toward building a single common IP core for future access technologies with seamless mobility. This gives operators the freedom to choose any access technology without having to worry about a complete overhaul of their existing IP core or an IP core overlay.
Page 4
BTS
GERAN SGSN/MME
Rel. 6/7 Gn/Gp SGSN Re 8 Rel. S4SGSN S11MME Rel. 6/7 Direct Tunnel
AAA/HSS
NodeB
UTRAN
Rel. 8 S12Direct Tunnel
Support for multiple network technologies and the corresponding multimedia core network functionality in a multi-access, multi-service environment.
Internet
PGW/ GGSN
For instance, the MME, SGW, and PGW can be combined into one carrier-class platform. By collapsing these functions, operators could reduce the signaling overhead, distribute session management, and leverage the control and user plane capabilities of the carrier-class node. Alternatively, an operator could deploy the MME separate from the combined SGW and PGW, resulting in reduced signaling overhead (S5 and S8 would be internal), fewer hops on the bearer path, less backhaul, reduced signaling on the S7 interface, and lower session requirement for the PGW. This also provides for a single location for policy enforcement and charging data generation. Additionally, co-location of 2G/3G SGSNs with the MME will reduce signaling and context transfer overhead significantly. This co-location will also be key to 2G/3G and 4G mobility and session management. The advantage of integrating or collapsing functional elements into one carrier-class node is paramount to the goals of simplifying and flattening the network while also reducing latency.
network migration, reducing signaling overhead, enhancing resource utilization by sharing common session data storage, and improving mobility between 2G/3G and 4G access systems. Most importantly, operators have the potential to achieve this without a forklift upgrade by leveraging their existing 3G deployed base. This results in dramatic capital and operational savings and reduces risk involved in adding a new, unproven access technology.
Page 5
Mobility Management Entity (MME)The MME resides in the control plane and manages states (attach, detach, idle, RAN mobility), authentication, paging, mobility with 3GPP 2G/3G nodes (SGSN), roaming, and other bearer management functions.
Intelligent QoS control based on service type, user profile, and business policy Visibility of the access technology type in the EPC nodes. For example, automatically adapting QoS for ongoing sessions when the user equipment performs a handover between an LTE and 2G/3G/WiMAX network Providing a greater degree of information granularity and flexibility for billing, network planning, and usage trend analysis Sharing information with external application servers that perform value-added processing Exploiting user-specific attributes to launch unique applications on a per-subscriber basis Extending mobility management information to non-mobility aware applications Enabling policy, charging, and QoS features
Serving Gateway (SGW)The SGW sits in the user plane where it forwards and routes packets to and from the eNodeB and Packet Data Network Gateway (PGW). The SGW also serves as the local mobility anchor for inter-eNodeB handover and roaming between two 3GPP systems.
Packet Data Network Gateway (PGW)The PGW (sometimes called the PDN Gateway) acts as the interface between the LTE network and Packet Data Networks (PDNs), such as the Internet or SIP-based IMS networks (fixed and mobile). The PGW is the mobility anchor point for intra-3GPP access system mobility and for mobility between 3GPP access systems and non-3GPP access systems. The function is responsible for IP address allocation, charging, deep packet inspection, lawful intercept, policy enforcement, and other services.
Evolved Packet Data Gateway (ePDG)The ePDG is the primary element responsible for interworking between the EPC and untrusted non-3GPP networks, such as a wireless LAN. The ePDG uses Proxy Mobile IPv6 (PMIPv6) to interact with the PGW when the UE is in an untrusted non-3GPP system. The ePDG is involved in the Policy and Charging Enforcement Function (PCEF), meaning it manages Quality of Service (QoS), flow-based charging data generation, gating, deep packet inspection, and other functions.
Page 6
Page 7
SUMMARY
The deployment of LTE is another step in the evolution of the mobile network. While the deployment of 4G radio access networks receives considerable attention, the Evolved Packet Core has emerged as a critical element in the delivery of next generation mobile broadband services. As such, mobile operators are looking for solutions that provide them with the highest levels of exibility in architecting their networks, including co-location of 2G/3G and EPC functionality in a single platform, open interfaces, and the high-performance and intelligence required for an enhanced subscriber experience.
Starent Networks, Corp. 30 International Place Tewksbury, MA 01876 T: +1-978-851-1100 F: +1-978-640-6825 www.starentnetworks.com
Starent Networks maintains oces and development centers around the world. For the latest contact information, please go to http://www.starentnetworks.com/en/about/global-presence/default.cfm
2010 Cisco and/or its aliates. All rights reserved. Cisco, the Cisco logo, and Starent are trademarks or registered trademarks of Cisco and/or its aliates in the US and other countries. Third party trademarks mentioned in this document or website are the property of their respective owners. The use of the word partner does not imply a partnership relationship between Cisco and any other company. Copyright 2009 Starent Networks, Corp. The information in this document is the proprietary and condential property of Starent Networks, Corp. The material contained in this document is for informational purposes only and is subject to change without notice. No part of this document may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, or stored in a retrieval system in any form or by any means, mechanical, magnetic, optical, chemical, or otherwise without the written permission of Starent Networks, Corp. Starent, the Starent logo, ST16 and ST40 are registered trademarks of Starent Networks, Corp. Any trademarks, trade names, service marks, or service names owned or registered by any other company and used in this documentation are the property of their respective companies. NOTE: Be advised that the information contained in Starent's product roadmap does not constitute a promise or obligation of delivery of any functionality. Starent, at its sole discretion, and without notice to Customer, reserves the right to alter the design, specications, and forecasted time to market of all of its products on any roadmap, at any time, as part of its continuing program of product development. The information contained in this document may not be used to create or change any contractual obligation of Starent Networks, Corp. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this document by persons or entities other than the intended recipients is prohibited. Page 8 LTE, Simplifying the Migration to 4G Networks Starent Networks, Corp.