Use of Textiles
Use of Textiles
Use of textiles
8.1
Once a textile fabric has been manufactured, its potential for causing damage to the environment does not end. A fabric, no matter how high its quality or how well it is finished, coloured and generally enhanced, is of little or no use unless it is made into something. The possible products of this further processing include such widespread objects as clothing, upholstery, drapery, bedding and industrial goods. We normally tend to regard the primary (i.e. fabric production) and secondary (i.e. products made from fabrics) textile industries as separate ones, but the environment makes no such distinction; pollution is pollution no matter what its source may be. One of the major problems facing the entire industry today is a lack of communication between these two different areas, since there is often a misinterpretation of the needs of the secondary sector by members of the first one, as well as a misunderstanding of the capabilities of the primary industry by the secondary one. Nature may benefit substantially by the development of a closer connection between the two, reducing the number of discarded materials that result from these failures to match needs, abilities and production.
8.2
Types of use
In view of the nature of this book, a distinction is proposed here between different types of use in a way not normally adopted. Those uses intended to protect the environment in some way will be separated from the others and treated in Chapter 13. This is obviously not a simple matter, because there will be immense grey areas where the two cannot readily be distinguished. A geotextile barrier designed to prevent flooding of houses in an area inundated with water from a burst river bank, for instance, is clearly intended to keep the human inhabitants of the threatened region safe and alive. A geotextile used to contain polluted substances in a landfill site from leaching out into the water table is intended to protect the environment. Yet, the flood barrier also prevents erosion of land by water flow, while the 90
Use of textiles
91
contained pollution is also prevented from poisoning human beings, so that both end results are met in each case. The distinction here (which is totally arbitrary and personal) is to determine what seems to be the more important criterion for use and to allocate the application to the section that makes most sense in that case. In this chapter, the normal uses will be dealt with and the environmental protection uses will be deferred to Chapter 9.
8.3
Normal uses
8.3.1 Clothing
The most obvious normal use of textiles is in making clothing, a use that has been around for thousands of years. For the purpose of this chapter, products of the garment sector will include only clothing and accessories. As always, the machines needed to make them are complex, though usually much smaller in scale than those used in textile yarn and fabric manufacture. Cutting, sewing, pressing and other machines all need to be made and operated, at the now-familiar cost to the planet. There are frequently excess pieces of fabric that are cut away in making clothing to be discarded. It is, admittedly, possible to recycle these scraps, as will be discussed in the next chapter, but large, complex machinery is needed to put them back into the production train. Although such scraps may be too small anyway to make recycling worthwhile, one author1 describes yarns made with fibres recovered from the garment industry, noting that they avoid excess pollution by eliminating the need for fertilisers and dyes. Uses as socks, blankets and upholstery materials are mentioned specifically, a point that gives the key to this over-optimistic attitude. These articles differ from most textile end uses in that colour is not critical, unlike virtually all other applications. In more usual recycled goods, especially as they are almost invariably coloured, some process for removing all the dyestuffs is always needed. This involves chemical reactions in which bleaching agents or dye strippers are used to destroy the dye molecules or change their molecular structure to render them colourless. These substances are waste products that can harm the Earth once discarded into the environment (* L-2, W-3) (see Table 1.1 for an explanation of codes).
92
production of clothing may be regarded as too great to be justified as environmentally responsible. Few people actually wear more than one outfit at a time, which means that many garments are stored in environmentally destructive plastic bags for a great proportion of their useful life. After the season ends, it is currently fashionable, in a kind of lip service to planetary well-being, to recycle the articles via alternative outlets, such as second-hand clothing stores or factory shops selling designer clothes at reduced prices. Even this gesture is not entirely altruistic in terms of the Earths welfare; the loss of an article of clothing invariably leaves a gap that must be filled by something new in the wardrobe of the person making this supreme sacrifice. The premises where the unwanted garments are resold also need to be built, heated, lit, staffed and so on. Unfortunately, the pressures of the fashion industry appear to be increasing rather than declining, as would be preferable for ecological welfare. The problem, as always, lies in commercial interest. Modern people, especially in the developed world, are accustomed to the need to follow a fashion cycle on an annual or even seasonal basis, so that the fashion industry (and those connected with it) has a vested interest in ensuring a regular turnover of garments. It is inevitable that a large reduction in sales would lead to a major loss in employment, because it is not only the textile and clothing manufacturers who would be out of work, but also the designers, alteration staff, marketing specialists, transportation personnel, retailers, magazine editors or artists, and anyone else with an ancillary interest in the fashion world. The cumulative psychological effect on Society of the need of all these people to be kept in employment is difficult to resist, meaning that the relentless drive to be up-to-date will continue for as long as we (or our planetary home) are prepared to tolerate it.
8.4
Environmental aspects
8.4.1 Laundering
The renewal of the fashion requirement per se does not merely cause environmental problems in the debate regarding recycling versus disposal. As a consequence of our modern lifestyle and technology, dust and dirt are omnipresent, and soiling necessitates emergency procedures in the form of laundering or dry cleaning. Both of these can cause environmental difficulties. Laundering involves exposing the textile article to the combined effects of water, heat, agitation and detergent. Often, an optical bleach or a fabric softener is added to the mix, and machine drying is frequently used. Both of these procedures give a much more luxurious feel than do an untreated wash and outdoor drying on a clothing line. The energy needed to heat the water and operate the machinery, together with the chemicals (* W-3) discarded into the drain, are a source of harm, as also are the heat needed to operate and the polluted exhaust emitted (* A-2) from the dryer. The thermal load from both washing and drying can also affect the surrounding air or water (* W-1), making
Use of textiles
93
it unsafe for other species to exist in the neighbourhood of the discard point unless precautions are taken to reduce the rise in temperature occurring on discharge.
8.5
Household textiles
In the home, textiles find widespread use, from household furnishings such as carpets, cushions and table linens, to towels, bath mats or dish cloths. David Rigby Associates3 give an overview of the various types of textile applications in home furnishing products, suggesting that the largest growth in the foreseeable future will occur in non-wovens or fibrefill categories, rather than in the more traditional
94
woven or knitted fabrics. Two unusual applications in the household category have been reported in the literature; one author4 writes of the usefulness of wool tightly woven and attached to gypsum board (in the form of decorative panels) as a means of combating the relatively new hazard of sick building syndrome by absorbing the formaldehyde reputedly responsible for this problem. The second application5 consists of a system used to wrap houses during construction to maintain acceptable working comfort, for craftsmen operating on the outside walls of the house in adverse weather conditions, with enough moisture vapour permeability to ensure that breathing comfort can be retained.
8.6
Use of textiles
95
concentration of wheel loading. Locatelli15 reports the production of a stretchable roofing felt that can be installed and maintained without shrinkage when used in a layered system. A French company16 is marketing a woven structure that can be laid across soft, sandy or swampy ground, allowing vehicles to pass safely. In temporary houses, such as tents, fabrics are invariably used for their combination of light weight, easy folding ability, weather (especially wind) resistance and versatility.
96
included. They may be divided into those used directly by industry, those used in leisure or sport activities and those in which heavy duty use is needed in everyday life. Textiles used directly in industry include such diverse items as tarpaulins, filters, acoustic or thermal insulation and protective garments for workers.
Use of textiles
97
References
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Anon., Amer.Textile Int., 1998, 27(8), 84. Jipp, M., Bekleidung Wear, 1998, 50(20), 4849. David Rigby Associates, Textile Horizons, 1999, 19(1), 1215. Anon., Wool Record, 1999, 158/3657, 20. Bay Mills Ltd., High Perf. Textiles, 1999, August, 67. Bhonde, H.U., Synthetic Fibres, 1999, 29(1), 1719. Legler, F., Textile Horizons, 1998, 18(5), 1013. Hill, D., Tech. Textiles Int. 1998, 7(6), 1723. Swedberg, J., Ind. Fabric. Product Rev., 1998, 75(4), 1618. Swedberg, J., Ind. Fabric. Product Rev., 1998, 75(4), 5255. Hexcel-Fyfe Co., High Perf. Textiles, 1999, June, 67. Ma, G., Adv. Comp. Bull., 1998, December, 112. Peter, E., High. Perf. Textiles, 1999, August, 5. Komatsu, T.et al., Geot. Geom., 1998, 16(5), 257271. Locatelli, A., High. Perf. Textiles, 1999, August, 6. Societ Responsabilit Limit Deschamps, High. Perf. Textiles, 1999, July, 78. Fung, W., Coated and Laminated Textiles, Cambridge, Woodhead, 2002. Anon., High Perf. Textiles, 1998, December, 45. Barnes, J.A. and Rawson, N.J., Textiles Asia, 1998, 29(11), 3740. Gutlein, U., Schaper, J. and Von Dreyse, J.S., Textiles Usages Techniques, 1998, 29, 62 64. Anon., High Perf. Textiles, 1999, January, 67. Various authors, Textile Month, 2000, March, 622. Wagner, J.E., High. Perf. Textiles, 1999, August, 78. Newberry, A.L., Reinforced Plastics, 1998, 42(8), 3438. Daiwabo Co. Ltd., High. Perf. Textiles, 1998, October, 4. Du Pont Taiwan Ltd., High. Perf. Textiles, 1998, September, 56. Marsh, G., Reinforced Plastics, 1998, 42(11), 3236. Kotliar, A.M., Polymer Plastics Tech. Eng., 1999, 38(3), 513531.