Physical Chemistry II: Quantum Chemistry Lecture 19:many-Electron Atoms & Atomic Term Symbols
Physical Chemistry II: Quantum Chemistry Lecture 19:many-Electron Atoms & Atomic Term Symbols
Physical Chemistry II: Quantum Chemistry Lecture 19:many-Electron Atoms & Atomic Term Symbols
2+ -
Repulsion
Repulsion
2+
H =E
No analytical solutions even for He because of electron repulsion He and Li atoms can be handled by variation methods Need more practical approach for other atoms!
!1
!2
!3
! 2 (x1 ) ! ! N (x1 )
! 1 (x 2 ) ! 2 (x 2 ) ! ! 2 (x 2 ) 1 N! ! ! ! ! 1 (x N ) ! 2 (x N ) ! ! N (x N )
Mean-Field Approximation
Many-electron Hamiltonian:
! 2 N 2 N Ze 2 N !1 N e 2 H =! # "i ! # r + # j=i+1 r # 2me i=1 i=1 i=1 i ij
Many-electron Integrals:
N
kinetic term
nucleus potential
electron replusion
e2 ! 1! 2 !! j ! ! ! 1! 2 !! j ! j=2 r j 1
= =
N
!
j=2
e2 ! 1! j ! 1! j r1 j
2 2
Mean-Field Approximation
Hartree-Fock Mean-field Hamiltonian:
N ! 2 N 2 N Ze 2 N H =! # "i ! # r + # Vi (ri ) $ # hi 2me i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1 i
Single determinantal wavefunction leads naturally to the mean-field approximation The approximation allows a factorization of the Hamiltonian into N single-electron problems Given a basis, the theory provides a variational groundstate & optimal atomic orbitals within the single determinant approximation mean-field, no electron correlations N single-electron Schrodinger equations are interdependent requires solving self-consistently via an iterative procedure
Many-electron Model
Hartree-Fock (Self-consistent field, SCF) Method
H =E
Hunds Rule
For degenerate orbitals, electrons occupy them one at a time.
Less likely px py pz
Likely px py pz
Hunds Rule
Smaller electrostatic repulsion?
The electron-electron repulsion does not allow the two electrons getting too close to each other. However, this explanation is now obsolete.
Likely px py pz
Hunds Rule
Exchange energy makes the triplet configuration more stable
Different spins: two electrons do not exchange
px
py
pz
px
py
pz
In reality, it has been shown that the actual reason behind the increased stability is a decrease in the screening of electron-nuclear attractions. see Levine
Hunds Rule
Larger electron-nucleus interaction due to less screening when two different orbitals are occupied!
Less likely px py pz
Likely px py pz
C : 1s 2s 2 p
Electron configuration along does not fully specify the state of a many-electron system.
These three arrangements (states) have different energies when electron-electron repulsions are included!
Depending on total angular momentum!
Notations:
L = L1 + L2 + L3 + S = S + S + S +
1 2 3
L: quantum number for total orbital angular momentum l1, l2,: orbital angular momentum quantum numbers for each individual electrons S: quantum number for total spin angular momentum s1, s2,: spin angular momentum for each electrons
Example:
p2 (l1 = 1, l2 = 1): L = 2,1, 0
L= 2 =
1 =
= 0
D P S
L = l1 + l2 , l1 + l2 1,, l1 l2
2
0
Example:
p2 (l1 = 1, l2 = 1): L = 2,1, 0
L= 2 =
1 =
= 0
p2f1 (l1 = 1, l2 = 1, l3 = 3)
L=5, 4, 3, 2, 1,
D P S
l1 l2 l3
Number of microstates:
p2f1 (l1 = 1, l2 = 1, l3 = 3)
L = 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
25+1 = 11
24+1 = 9
23+1 = 7
22+1 = 5
21+1 = 3
35
Number of microstates:
p2f1 (l1 = 1, l2 = 1, l3 = 3)
L = 4, 3, 2
24+1 = 9
23+1 = 7
22+1 = 5
21
Number of microstates:
p2f1 (l1 = 1, l2 = 1, l3 = 3)
L = 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
L = 4, 3, 2
L = 3
3 3 7
35 21 7 63
Total spin angular momentum S for n electrons: S = n/2, n/21, n/22,, 0, for n even S = n/2, n/21, n/22,., 1/2, for n odd
Spin multiplicity = 2S+1
S=0, 2S+1=1, singlet, ms = 0 S=1/2, 2S+1=2, doublet, ms = , - S=1, 2S+1=3, triplet, ms = 1, 0, -1
Total spin angular momentum S for n electrons: S = n/2, n/21, n/22,, 0, for n even S = n/2, n/21, n/22,., 1/2, for n odd
2p
2
S=0 S=1 S=0
total spin multiplicity exchange energy stablizes many-electron states. slide multiplicity spin multiplicity. total multiplicity total spin multiplicity context multiplicity 2S+1, spin triplet spin triplet s=1, singlet spin singlet s=0
Hund's first rule states that the lowest energy atomic state is the one which maximizes the total multiplicity for all of the electrons in the open sub-shell.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Hund%27s_rules
J = L+S, L+S-1,.|L-S|
Designation: L =0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
S, P, D, F, G, H.
L-S Terms determine energy levels of atomic electronic states for atoms with small spin-orbital coupling (L-S coupling), i.e. not for heavy atoms.
S1
2
2s
S1/ 2
2
2p
P3 / 2
P/2 1
Energy
spin-orbit interaction
1s
S1/ 2
Energy
Many-electron Atoms
For many-electron system, one may derive the electronic states from the ML, MS, and MJ values.
M L = (ml )i = 0,1,2,.... L
i
M S = (ms )i = 0,1,2,.... S
i
M J = M L + M S = 0,1,2,.... J
These magnetic quantum numbers are easy to determine from electronic configurations we can then derive (L, S, J) from the intervals!
Example 2
1s2
Example 3
1s12s1
S0
1
S1
S0 + S1
3
Example 4
Carbon: 1s22s22p2
Ignored
2p2
6! = 15 2!4!
microstates
M n
Carbon: 2p2
Must have a
1D
Carbon: 2p2
Must have a
3P
1S
too!!
J=2
J=0
Carbon: 2p2
J = 2, 1, 0
2S+1L J
Carbon: 2p2
H0
H 0 + H rep
H 0 + H rep
+ H s .o .
H 0 + H rep
+ H s .o . + H Z
If spin-orbit coupling is larger than the electron-electron repulsion, the scheme of j-j coupling is used instead of L-S coupling. The j-j coupling scheme is more appropriate for heavy transition metal atoms: stronger core potential, faster electron, much more prominent relativistic effects.