Learning and Development Insight 2012
Learning and Development Insight 2012
Learning and Development Insight 2012
ProfitAbility Insight:
Great Learning in 2012
Executive Summary
ProfitAbility New Dimensions User Group survey, November 2011: What factors reduce the effectiveness of skills-based business learning?
DefiningGreat Learning
Increasingly, L&D and HR professionals recognise that looking at learning interventions in isolation is not enough, and that this alone cannot deliver the desired business outcomes. With an increasing number of HR and L&D professionals represented at executive level, the emphasis is clear: training needs to prove its effectiveness on more than just individual development it must impact business results. ProfitAbilitys recent investments in collaborative and extended learning solutions* reflect the need to ensure that learning is retained and used. But clearly there is more to it than that, and different organisations vary significantly in their outlook Survey respondents talked about great learning in three distinct ways. The responses were evenly split between these three areas, though it is worth noting that senior HR and L&D professionals from organisations with in excess of 100,000 employees were more inclined than other respondents to focus on business results over and above the learning experience:
To quote respondents, great learning: is continuous learning and growth. It never ends is about being self-aware and open to learn is engaging and experiential is always an effective use of time is something that creates value changes behaviours and perspectives inspires immediate application has measureable business impact makes a permanent impression adds real long-term value to the person and the organisation is something that people want to implement activates prior learning transforms teams and their output occurs when the L&D team is aligned to the corporate vision shapes culture.
* You can find out more about ProfitAbilitys online learning platform from November 2012 on our website at www.profitability.com
ProfitAbility Insight: Great Learning in 2012
Managers of trainees help them apply their learning Managers and workers work with L&D to create learning and application programs designed to achieve business result
According to CLO magazine, June 2012: CLOs have passed through a difficult period, but a large number expect learning and development will continue to evolve into a stronger entity recognized as contributing to delivery of business strategies and objectives. Some see different writing on the wall and think CLOs will be under severe cost-cutting pressure unless [they] can defend the strategic and financial impact.
The table below looks at only the priority ranked by participants as a top priority (the options included top priority, very important, fairly important, not important and completely irrelevant). Accelerating leadership was rated as top priority in the US, within companies with more than 10,000 employees, and by learning and HR professionals. However, smaller companies, and UK-based businesses, ranked adapting to change as their top priority. This reflects the continuing uncertainty in many markets, driven in part be economic factors, but also due to competition, issues of sustainability and corporate social responsibility, and the competitive nature of todays business world. The percentage split for each group is shown in the table below.
Top priority
Strategy implementation 13% 11% 16% 11% 13% 19% 13% 10% 16%
Accelerating leadership
Strategic development
Adapting to change
ALL UK USA 100k + companies 10k + companies Less than 10k companies L&D HR Exec / c-level
3% 6% 0% 4% 4% 0% 4% 7% 3%
3% 5% 0% 4% 2% 0% 0% 4% 2%
6% 7% 5% 4% 6% 5% 4% 6% 1%
9% 9% 8% 8% 9% 9% 7% 9% 6%
Teamwork
Whilst accelerating leadership received the most top priority votes, it is interesting to note that when combining the scores for the very important and important, accelerating leadership drops down to sixth place.
10
Learning modality
Content, audience, environment and available technology all play a role in how learning is delivered. The survey showed that organisations seem to be spending on average less than 20% of their training budget on e-learning, and that 10% of businesses (predominantly those with less than 10,000 people) spend nothing at all on eLearning. eLearning spend in the USA is slightly higher than in the UK and rest of the world, as shown in the chart below.
Businesses are getting more sophisticated in their modality choices. Classroom training remains the most significant form of training despite innovative alternatives largely because even the most effective new technologies cannot compare with real-life experience. Organisations that reduce their classroom-based information are most often driven by cost. Yet when organisations increase their use of classroom-learning, it is because of effectiveness.
11
12
As market demands continue to change, organisational success will hinge on HRs ability to connect human capital decisions.
However, a significant proportion of assenters were keen to point out that whilst they in the human resources function were very clear on the critical importance of human capital decisions, in reality, we are too slow to react as a company, an business and people strategy are not really well aligned. We are undergoing extensive change but operational HR managers in particular are not being kept fully in the picture. There is also a strong argument that the focus on human capital should be critical not just within the HR and L&D functions, but in business leaders generally. As the HR business partner for a leading pharmaceutical firm put it I agree there should be a connection - but is this the responsibility entirely of HR?? My view is that we need Business Leaders with a strong HR ability.
13
Executive responsibility
An increasing proportion of HR and L&D professionals are reaching board level positions, reflecting the increasing emphasis on the importance of talent and human capital decisions within successful business. Notably, as the chart below shows, both HR and L&D have greater presence within the US market. This contrasts with the emphasis in countries with head offices or regional talent functions within the UK and Europe, where learning and development can sometimes be seen as a function within human resources, rather than as an entity in its own right. As one participant put it succinctly long-timers are running the show. This makes initiating and executing change across the organization extremely difficult. A senior HR business partner at the UKs leading airline makes this comment: There is growing evidence that human resources are crucial to organisational success, and may offer the best return on investment for sustainable competitive advantage. We turn to treating human resources as a capital investment for competitive advantage. Specific attention is given to increasingly recognised human and social capital and the newly proposed positive psychological capital. We must pay attention to guidelines on how to practically manage human, social, and positive psychological capital for an organisation to gain competitive advantage
14
Appendix 1
ALL respondents most important least important Education / training / business schools most important least important Banking and Finance most important least important Utilities / government most important least important Manufacturing most important least important Retail most important least important Media tech telco most important least important Pharms most important least important FMCG, food & drink, restaurants most important least important Logistics, transport and distribution most important least important
N = 430 61% 57% 7% 11% N = 36 72% 58% 4% 4% N = 42 72% 71% 3% 3% N = 58 65% 54% 8% 17% N = 50 59% 63% 7% 5% N = 18 60% 69% 7% 0% N = 40 53% 64% 9% 6% N = 30 52% 44% 11% 16% N = 21 65% 58% 6% 11% N = 19 63% 69% 0% 13%
56% 9% 76% 4% 80% 3% 55% 12% 54% 10% 38% 8% 53% 6% 33% 22% 60% 10% 69% 13%
55% 13% 32% 23% 69% 3% 47% 16% 64% 6% 53% 7% 58% 6% 48% 19% 64% 7% 69% 6%
54% 11% 57% 7% 52% 3% 47% 23% 59% 11% 60% 0% 59% 6% 48% 12% 50% 6% 69% 13%
51% 14% 58% 15% 51% 3% 55% 16% 46% 13% 73% 0% 45% 15% 58% 17% 63% 0% 71% 12%
42% 28% 47% 25% 31% 29% 35% 43% 52% 33% 31% 31% 41% 25% 42% 21% 47% 12% 50% 14%
40% 23% 42% 26% 55% 11% 25% 38% 50% 11% 36% 29% 58% 16% 36% 16% 58% 0% 50% 17%
32% 24% 27% 27% 33% 14% 40% 31% 32% 16% 19% 31% 36% 17% 24% 31% 45% 5% 44% 17%
(Note the caveat that these numbers are unlikely to hold up to robust statistical testing, with respondent numbers by industry sector varying from 18 to 58 people, so should be used as indicative of trends and not as concrete data)
Teamwork
Strategy
15
ProfitAbility Ltd Stables 1, Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxon OX10 8BA United Kingdom t: +44 (0) 1491821900 f: +44 (0) 1491821901 e: info@profitability.com Profitability Business Simulations, October 2012