Self Awareness Final
Self Awareness Final
Self Awareness Final
Presented To:
Self-Awareness
Prepared By
Kashfia Mahbub Tasrif Khaled Md. Muntasir Jashim Mohammed Hasan Rabbani
1|Page
Self-Awareness
Table of Contents
Contents
1. Introduction 2. Topic Review & Analysis 3. Theoretical Framework 4. Relevant Examples & Feedbacks in Context of Bangladesh 5. Critical Analysis 6. Conclusion 7. References
Page Number
3 4-5 6-9 10-11
12-13 14 15-16
2|Page
Self-Awareness
INTRODUCTION
Self-awareness means knowing ones self at a deep level. According to Tao Tuz, Knowing other is wisdom, knowing yourself is Enlightenment. The challenges of todays organizations are to develop capabilities of continuous sensing, learning and adjusting to the dynamics of their environments (Magalahaes, 2004). And the requirements of these capabilities are developing Self-Awareness. Self-Awareness includes understanding ourselves. No one is perfect and of understanding of ourselves, our fears, the things which excite us can help to kive in the greater world and in harmony with others. Self-Awareness also includes the basics such as being clear about what we like to do and what we do not like. It is all about understanding and feeling comfortable with ones self behavior. According to Northup (2007) in todays fast paced world, change will happen and will affect everyone. Organizational change driven by technology and world competitiveness is transformational, not just directional. Effective CEOs who want to be in control of change in their organization know that positive change is leader directed and that leader must be self-aware. Successful leaders have a strong self-awareness and deeply understand their emotions, strengths, limitations, values and motives. They tend to be honest and realistic with themselves and towards organization. But the Organizations must have similar understanding. In personal and organizational in both areas managers must be realistic. They cannot rationalize problems away or convince themselves that the situation is different than it truly is.
3|Page
Self-Awareness
Self-Awareness
environment they must continually develop the strengths of their key people, share power with them and encourage active participation (Northup, 2007). A number of researchers have been exploring the psychological concept of Self-Awareness from an applied ratings-based perspective (e.g. Atwater & Yammarion, 1992; Van-Velsor, Taylor & Leslie, 1993). Many researchers (e.g. Ashford & Tsui, 1992; McCall, Lombardo & Morrison, 1998; Sintar, 1988) have argued that Self-Awareness is an important ability and skill set for achieving managerial excellence. Thus, better managers should be more skilled at assessing the level of their own believers and the impact those behaviors have on others. Moreover, high performance and high potentials in organizations should also exhibit greater levels of SelfAwareness because they apparently have already been identified as possessing promising managerial characteristics such as strong interpersonal leadership and communication skills (Derr, Jones & Tommey, 1988; Garfield, 1986) and are often given significantly greater development opportunities that serve to enhance their abilities. When the organization supports personal growth and self-awareness the overall group tends to help each other out more. People tend to show more care towards others, conflict at work is decreased and overall people get along better. The self-aware manager contributes more to society through actions and role modeling. Society over time benefits the most. Programs and strategies for building society take into account human factors and implications. There is more emphasis on understanding all the parts and how they make up the whole system. This type of thinking impacts decisions, strategies, and where we place our focus and effort.
5|Page
Self-Awareness
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
According to Carl Rogers, Becoming a person means that the individual moves toward being, knowingly and acceptingly, the process which she/he inwardly and actually is. Self-awareness is a broader concept that focuses on the image that an individual has of him/herself. Individual who is self-aware has a deep understanding of his/her emotions, strengths, weaknesses and drives. The definition of managerial self-awareness as the ability to reflect on accurately assesses one's own behaviors and skills as they are manifested in workplace interactions. Awareness of any discrepancy between how one see him/herself and how others see them enhances selfawareness, a key to maximum performance (McCarthy and Garavan 1999). McCarthy and Garavan 1999, argue that a cannily mentor can help one to attain higher levels of self-awareness by understanding their own emotions. The study of self-awareness continues to be a dynamic and active research area. Lots of research relevant to basic theoretical issues has been conducted. There are five most critical areas of self-awareness that have been found to be important in developing successful management.
6|Page
Self-Awareness
Core SelfEvaluation
Emotional Intelligence
Values
Learning Style
According to the Self-Awareness model Core Self-Evaluation is identifying ones underlying personality attributes. It is a belief about amount of control a person has over situations in their life. High performing managers are more self-aware (Church, 97) because they evaluate themselves. Self-Evaluation is all about Self-Esteem, Self-Efficacy, Emotional stability and Locus control which leads to Personality uniqueness, Job satisfaction, Job performance and leads a manager towards a happy life. Through Self-Efficacy and other evaluation process a manager is capable to perform in a certain manner or attain certain organizational goals. Second area of Self-Awareness is Values which identifies personal standards and moral judgments. Personal Values are the core of the dynamics of behavior, and play so large part in unifying personality (Allport, Gordon, & Vernon, 1931, p. 2). Personal Value helps to define morality and ethics.
7|Page
Self-Awareness
Two major types of values are considered: Instrumental Values which contain desirable standards of conduct for attaining an end and another one is Terminal Values which is desirable ends or goals for the individual (Rokeach, 1973). The values that managers desire are Sense of Accomplishment, Self-Respect, A comfortable Life and Independence. Third area of SelfAwareness is Learning Style which represents an individuals inclination to perceive, interpret and respond to information in a certain way. Fourth area is attitude Towards Chan which identifies adaptability and responsibility. The sooner the managers adapt the cultural affairs of the organization the more success they achieve. And final area is Emotional Intelligence which identifies the emotional awareness and control. Emotional Intelligence is difficult to measure and define. It is considered to be important measures of managerial success. Based on these five critical areas, the employees and managers of Square Pharmaceuticals practiced each of these portions with great care. They implemented the best assessment styles in the business with relevant accessible models. By this, the employees developed their core competencies with greater values and adapted their environment by the passing of time. This resulted to the market position of the company. For this the company will be forever thankful to their HR department who always remained accessible for the employees in any kind of help. They understood what can boost the employee performance and what the employees will to be awarded. To perfect ones management skills, the best place to start is self-awareness. Self-awareness means knowing your values, personality, needs, habits, emotions, strengths, weaknesses, etc. Moreover, self-awareness allows one to motivate oneself and manage ones stress better, helps you with your intuitive decision making, and helps you to lead and motivate others more effectively. Self-awareness is very useful. Self-awareness helps managers identify gaps in their management skills, which promotes skill development. But self-awareness also helps managers find situations in which they will be most effective, assists with intuitive decision making, and aids stress management and motivation of oneself and others. Self-aware employees create an important source of competitive advantage for firms (Barney, 1991; Prefer 1994). Self-awareness helps manager to exploit their strengths and cope with their weaknesses. It's very difficult to cope with poor results when they don't understand what causes them. When a manager doesnt know what behaviors to change to
8|Page
Self-Awareness
improve his performance, he just feels helpless. Self-awareness is empowering because it can reveal where the performance problems are and indicate what can be done to improve performance. In addition, awareness of mangers psychological needs can increase his motivation by helping him understand and seek out the rewards that he really desires such as a sense of accomplishment, additional responsibility. Manager can become more self-aware by seeking feedback from the people who know you, completing self-assessment surveys, and hiring an expert like a professional counselor or executive coach. Many experts suggest that managers find a way to get anonymous feedback from staff members and co-workers. (e.g., Ed Eppley, Area Manager for Dale Carnegie Training, and Ellen Van Velsor of the Center for Creative Leadership) The contribution of individual understandings to the processing of information, decision making and memory function (e.g., Bandura & Jourden, 1991; Hendrick 1990; Lewicki, 1983) must also be considered as a potential moderator in any rating-based Self-Awareness. Individual differences in convergent theories of personality must also be considered in any attempt to explain differences in the level of an agreement in performance ratings. Both the Self-Monitoring (Snyder, 1974, 1987) and Self-Consciousness constructs (e.g., Buss, 1980; Fenigstein, 1987; Fenigstein et al., 1975) appear to have direct relevance to level of Self-Other agreement obtained if this measure in fact reflects an appropriate operationalization of Managerial Self-Awareness. In summary, Self-Monitoring Theory hypothesizes that individuals differ on the extent to which they actively monitor, regulate and control their own expressive behaviors in the presence of others. Lower Self-Monitor tends to behave according to their own inner states rather than external socially driven cues and Higher Self-Monitors behave in the opposite; that is they are driven by interpersonal situations rather than internal convictions (Briggs & Cheek, 1988; Snyder, 1987). Thus, High Self-Monitors are more likely to attend and assess their own behaviors in the workplace.
9|Page
Self-Awareness
Self-Awareness
hiring an expert like a professional counselor or executive coach. A Self-Aware manager should be ready to accept any kind of feedbacks and complaints from the employees. SQUARE PHARMA has done their task with great responsibility in this sector. SQUARE deals with these criteria in a flexible way. They heard their employees so the employees up lifted the company by their competencies. We hardly came to know about a Pharmaceutical Company in Bangladesh name PHARMIC Pharmaceuticals. Because of their low performance in HR department and lack of SelfAwareness among the managers and employees the company is going through huge loss. The employees are not motivated in a positive way which has a very bad effect on the success of the company. The company does not give their employee proper time and support to know about their fault and learn from their mistakes. PHARMIC do not provide any additional training, resources and manpower that often. Besides these there are many lackings of Proper HR practice in PHARMIC Pharmacetucals which does not let their employees be Self-Aware.
11 | P a g e
Self-Awareness
CRITICAL ANALYSIS
Self-Awareness is an essential part in any organization. From the case How to crack the SelfAwareness Paradigm we came to know that how Mr. John Baldoni explains the necessity of Managerial Skill and Self-Awareness. Through critical evaluation and analysis the result of the study shows some limitations in distinctive organizational and social context. Although the Theoretical framework upholds influential academic approach still there are some conflicts in the application and implementation of Self-Awareness practices in the organization among the managers. Self-awareness, in general, continues to be difficult to define and measure. Across the research, inconsistencies in the measurement or definition of self-awareness may account for the differences in research findings. One of the Self-Awareness theories has proposed that there are five areas of Self-awareness. According to the first area Core Self-Evaluation is identifying ones underlying personality attributes and high performing managers are more Self-Aware as they evaluate themselves. But self-evaluation is a critical work. The managers must be brutally honest about their competency in the various categories. It is not a simple task because for selfevaluating one need to face the ability of accepting the criticisms but in terms of Bangladeshi context it is really hard to hear such negative criticism. Again another limitation is found in Emotional Intelligence which identifies the emotional awareness and control. But in context of Bangladesh people can hardly control their emotions. Most of the time executives as well as higher level managers generally get angry in stressful situation instead of looking at the problem and calmly finding the solution. So Emotional Intelligence is difficult to measure ad define. Becoming Self-Aware does not mean being selfish though. Discovering the inner part of oneself and by knowing others will benefit managers to build Self-Esteem and bring confidence by themselves. Another limitation is in the Self-Monitoring theory. It is not possible for a manager to actively monitor, regulate or control and measure his behaviors in presence of others. The measure of Self-Awareness becomes a gap between Self-Report and some objective. And the measurement becomes confusing between what is being asked in a Self-Report through Self-Monitoring and what is being objectively measured.
12 | P a g e
Self-Awareness
In PHARMIC PHARMA it is observed that the employees as well as the managers show low Self-Awareness and it is the main reason that the company is going through losses. They should provide some Functional Assessments to improve their employees managerial skills and to increase Self-Awareness. Functional assessment allows for the assessment of the specific demands of an individuals environment and the individuals performance in regards to those demands; this would provide a more ecologically valid measure for objective performance (Chaytor, Schmitter-Edgecombe, & Burr, 2006). PHARMIC PHARMA should position those assessments based on functioning in real world situation, may provide more appropriate objective standards for defining Self-Awareness. A main limitation of this research is its inability to clearly define Self-Awareness because SelfAwareness varies among individuals as well as in Organizations. Hoofien, Gilboa, Vakil, and Barak (2004) suggested that overall Self-Awareness is not as significant to or predictive of functional outcomes as Self-Awareness in specific domains.
13 | P a g e
Self-Awareness
CONCLUSION
Every Organization built on competitiveness in the market whether it is local organization or International. And in this competitive world it is not easy to establish trust. The managers of the organizations may face difficulties if their abilities of understanding and read others are poorly developed. Realistic vision and understanding Organizational behaviors or Co-workers is gained from Self-Awareness. Managers must gain the knowledge and skill how to be a good Leader. And a true Leader shares his value with others who must be able to demonstrate unseen soft qualities such as moral integrity, honesty, sincerity and true dedication. Insight brings focused Leadership. Focus drives performance and Performance drives result.
14 | P a g e
Self-Awareness
References
Allan, H., & Church, W., (2008). Managerial Self-Awareness in High-Performing Individuals in Organizations. Warner Burke Associates.
Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Aca d -emy of Management Journal,34, 251-280
Atwater, L. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (1992). Does self-other agreement on leadership perceptions moderate the validity of leadership and performance predictions? Personnel Psychology, 45, 141-164.
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99120
Derr, C. B., Jones, C., & Toomey, E. L. (1988). Managing highpotential employees: Current practices in thirty-three U. S. corporations. Human Resource Management, 27, 273-290.
Garfield, C. (1986). Peak performers: The new heroes of American business. New York: Avon Books.
Goldsmith, M. (2010, April). Be a Better Leader by Building Your Self-awareness. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/tip/2010/04/22/be-a-better-leader-by-building-your-self-awareness
Grover, R. (2003, December). Stalking a Wiley Prey at Disney. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/dec2003/nf2003122_5238_db035.htm
McCall, M.W., Jr., Lombardo, M.M., & Morrison, A.M. (1988). The lessons of experience: How successful executives develop on the job. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
15 | P a g e
Self-Awareness
Sinetar, M. (1988). Building trust into corporate relationships. Organizational Dynamics, 16(3), 73-79.
Velsor, E., Taylor, S., & Leslie, J. B. (1993). An examination of the relationships among selfperception accuracy, selfawareness, gender, and leader effectiveness. Human Resource Management, 32 (2-3), 249-263.
16 | P a g e