Abuse, Trauma, and Torture - Their Consequences and Effects

Abuse, Torture, And
Trauma and Their

Consequences and
Effects
1st EDITION
Sam Vaknin, Ph.D.


       
       
 

  
 

   
 
    
     
     
     
    
palma@unet.com.mk 
vaksam@mt.net.mk
        
  
    
    
   
  
     
http://www.geocities.com/vaksam/narclist.html
http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/narclist.html
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabus
e
    
http://samvak.tripod.com
    
  
  
   
http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/thebook.html
 
 
    
      
     
Pathological Narcissism – An Overview
A Primer on Narcissism and the Narcissistic
Personality Disorder (NPD)
The Narcissist's Entitlement of Routine
Pathological Narcissism – A Dysfunction or a
Blessing?
The Narcissist's Confabulated Life
The Cult of the Narcissist
Bibliography
The Narcissist in the Workplace

Narcissism in the Boardroom
The Professions of the Narcissist
, Abuse, Torture - An Overview

What is Abuse?
Traumas as Social Interactions
The Psychology of Torture
Trauma, Abuse, Torture - Effects and
Consequences
How Victims are Affected by Abuse
Victim reaction to Abuse By Narcissists and
Psychopaths
The Three Forms of Closure
Surviving the Narcissist
Mourning the Narcissist
The Inverted Narcissist
Torture, Abuse, and Trauma – In Fiction and Poetry

Nothing is Happening at Home
Night Terror
A Dream Come True
Cutting to Existence
In the concentration camp called Home
Sally Ann
The Miracle of the Kisses
Guide to Coping with Narcissists and

Psychopaths
The Author
The Book (“ Malignant Self- love:
Narcissism Revisited”)

 http://samvak.tripod.com/siteindex.html
A Profile of the
Narcissistic Abuser
Pathological Narcissism – An Overview

A Primer on Narcissism
And the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD)
What is Pathological Narcissism?

Pathological narcissism is a life-long pattern of traits
and behaviours which signify infatuation and obsession
with one's self to the exclusion of all others and the
egotistic and ruthless pursuit of one's gratification,
dominance and ambition.
As distinct from healthy narcissism which we all
possess, pathological narcissism is maladaptive, rigid,
persisting, and causes significant distress, and functional
impairment.
Pathological narcissism was first described in detail by
Freud in his essay "On Narcissism" [1915]. Other major
contributors to the study of narcissism are: Melanie
Klein, Karen Horney, Franz Kohut, Otto Kernberg,
Theodore Millon, Elsa Roningstam, Gunderson, and
Robert Hare.
What is Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD)?
The Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) (formerly
known as megalomania or, colloquially, as egotism) is a
form of pathological narcissism. It is a Cluster B
(dramatic, emotional, or erratic) Personality Disorder.
Other Cluster B personality disorders are the Borderline
Personality Disorder (BPD), the Antisocial Personality
Disorder (APD), and the Histrionic Personality Disorder
(HPD). The Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD)
first appeared as a mental health diagnosis in the DSM-
III-TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) in 1980.
Diagnostic Criteria
The ICD-10, the International Classification of
Diseases, published by the World Health Organisation in
Geneva [1992] regards the Narcissistic Personality
Disorder (NPD) as "a personality disorder that fits none
of the specific rubrics". It relegates it to the category
"Other Specific Personality Disorders" together with the
eccentric, "haltlose", immature, passive-aggressive, and
psychoneurotic personality disorders and types.
The American Psychiatric Association, based in
Washington D.C., USA, publishes the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition,
Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) [2000] where it provides
the diagnostic criteria for the Narcissistic Personality
Disorder (301.81, p. 717).
The DSM-IV-TR defines Narcissistic Personality
Disorder (NPD) as "an all-pervasive pattern of
grandiosity (in fantasy or behaviour), need for
admiration or adulation and lack of empathy, usually
beginning by early adulthood and present in various
contexts", such as family life and work.
The DSM specifies nine diagnostic criteria. Five (or
more) of these criteria must be met for a diagnosis of
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) to be rendered.
[In the text below, I have proposed modifications to
the language of these criteria to incorporate current
knowledge about this disorder. My modifications appear
in italics.]
[My amendments do not constitute a part of the text of
the DSM-IV-TR, nor is the American Psychiatric
Association (APA) associated with them in any way.]
[Click here to download a bibliography of the studies
and research regarding the Narcissistic Personality
Disorder (NPD) on which I based my proposed
revisions.]
Proposed Amended Criteria for the
Narcissistic Personality Disorder
• Feels grandiose and self-important (e.g., exaggerates
accomplishments, talents, skills, contacts, and
personality traits to the point of lying, demands to be
recognised as superior without commensurate
achievements);
• Is obsessed with fantasies of unlimited success,
fame, fearsome power or omnipotence, unequalled
brilliance (the cerebral narcissist), bodily beauty or
sexual performance (the somatic narcissist), or ideal,
everlasting, all-conquering love or passion;
• Firmly convinced that he or she is unique and, being
special, can only be understood by, should only be
treated by, or associate with, other special or unique,
or high-status people (or institutions);
• Requires excessive admiration, adulation, attention
and affirmation – or, failing that, wishes to be feared
and to be notorious (Narcissistic Supply);
• Feels entitled. Demands automatic and full
compliance with his or her unreasonable
expectations for special and favourable priority
treatment;
• Is "interpersonally exploitative", i.e., uses others to
achieve his or her own ends;
• Devoid of empathy. Is unable or unwilling to identify
with, acknowledge, or accept the feelings, needs,
preferences, priorities, and choices of others;
• Constantly envious of others and seeks to hurt or
destroy the objects of his or her frustration. Suffers
from persecutory (paranoid) delusions as he or she
believes that they feel the same about him or her and
are likely to act similarly;
• Behaves arrogantly and haughtily. Feels superior,
omnipotent, omniscient, invincible, immune, "above
the law", and omnipresent (magical thinking). Rages
when frustrated, contradicted, or confronted by
people he or she considers inferior to him or her and
unworthy.
Prevalence and Age and Gender Features
According to the DSM-IV-TR, between 2% and 16% of
the population in clinical settings (between 0.5-1% of
the general population) are diagnosed with Narcissistic
Personality Disorder (NPD). Most narcissists (50-75%,
according to the DSM-IV-TR) are men.
We must carefully distinguish between the narcissistic
traits of adolescents – narcissism is an integral part of
their healthy personal development – and the full-fledge
disorder. Adolescence is about self-definition,
differentiation, separation from one's parents, and
individuation. These inevitably involve narcissistic
assertiveness which is not to be conflated or confused
with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
"The lifetime prevalence rate of NPD is approximately
0.5-1 percent; however, the estimated prevalence in
clinical settings is approximately 2-16 percent. Almost
75 percent of individuals diagnosed with NPD are male
(APA, DSM-IV-TR 2000)."
[From the Abstract of Psychotherapeutic Assessment
and Treatment of Narcissistic Personality Disorder By
Robert C. Schwartz, Ph.D., DAPA and Shannon D.
Smith, Ph.D., DAPA (American Psychotherapy
Association, Article #3004 Annals July/August 2002)]
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is
exacerbated by the onset of aging and the physical,
mental, and occupational restrictions it imposes.
In certain situations, such as under constant public
scrutiny and exposure, a transient and reactive form of
the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) has been
observed by Robert Milman and labelled "Acquired
Situational Narcissism".
There is only scant research regarding the Narcissistic
Personality Disorder (NPD), but studies have not
demonstrated any ethnic, social, cultural, economic,
genetic, or professional predilection to it.
Co-Morbidity and Differential Diagnoses
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is often
diagnosed with other mental health disorders ("co-
morbidity"), such as mood disorders, eating disorders,
and substance-related disorders. Patients with
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) are frequently
abusive and prone to impulsive and reckless behaviours
("dual diagnosis").
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is commonly
diagnosed with other personality disorders, such as the
Histrionic, Borderline, Paranoid, and Antisocial
Personality Disorders.
The personal style of those suffering from the
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) should be
distinguished from the personal styles of patients with
other Cluster B personality disorders. The narcissist is
grandiose, the histrionic coquettish, the antisocial
(psychopath) callous, and the borderline needy.
As opposed to patients with the Borderline Personality
Disorder, the self-image of the narcissist is stable, he or
she are less impulsive and less self-defeating or self-
destructive and less concerned with abandonment issues
(not as clinging).
Contrary to the histrionic patient, the narcissist is
achievements-orientated and proud of his or her
possessions and accomplishments. Narcissists also
rarely display their emotions as histrionics do and they
hold the sensitivities and needs of others in contempt.
According to the DSM-IV-TR, both narcissists and
psychopaths are "tough-minded, glib, superficial,
exploitative, and un-empathic". But narcissists are less
impulsive, less aggressive, and less deceitful.
Psychopaths rarely seek Narcissistic Supply. As opposed
to psychopaths, few narcissists are criminals.
Patients suffering from the range of obsessive-
compulsive disorders are committed to perfection and
believe that only they are capable of attaining it. But, as
opposed to narcissists, they are self-critical and far more
aware of their own deficiencies, flaws, and
shortcomings.
Clinical Features of the Narcissistic Personality
Disorder
The onset of pathological narcissism is in infancy,
childhood and early adolescence. It is commonly
attributed to childhood abuse and trauma inflicted by
parents, authority figures, or even peers. Pathological
narcissism is a defence mechanism intended to deflect
hurt and trauma from the victim's "True Self" into a
"False Self" which is omnipotent, invulnerable, and
omniscient. The narcissist uses the False Self to regulate
his or her labile sense of self-worth by extracting from
his environment Narcissistic Supply (any form of
attention, both positive and negative).
There is a whole range of narcissistic reactions, styles,
and personalities – from the mild, reactive and transient
to the permanent personality disorder.
Patients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD)
feel injured, humiliated and empty when criticised. They
often react with disdain (devaluation), rage, and
defiance to any slight, real or imagined. To avoid such
situations, some patients with Narcissistic Personality
Disorder (NPD) socially withdraw and feign false
modesty and humility to mask their underlying
grandiosity. Dysthymic and depressive disorders are
common reactions to isolation and feelings of shame
and inadequacy.
The interpersonal relationships of patients with
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) are typically
impaired due to their lack of empathy, disregard for
others, exploitativeness, sense of entitlement, and
constant need for attention (Narcissistic Supply).
Though often ambitious and capable, inability to
tolerate setbacks, disagreement, and criticism make it
difficult for patients with Narcissistic Personality
Disorder (NPD) to work in a team or to maintain long-
term professional achievements. The narcissist's
fantastic grandiosity, frequently coupled with a
hypomanic mood, is typically incommensurate with his
or her real accomplishments (the "Grandiosity Gap").
are either "cerebral" (derive their Narcissistic Supply
from their intelligence or academic achievements) or
"somatic" (derive their Narcissistic Supply from their
physique, exercise, physical or sexual prowess and
romantic or physical "conquests").
are either "classic" (meet five of the nine diagnostic
criteria included in the DSM), or they are
"compensatory" (their narcissism compensates for deep-
set feelings of inferiority and lack of self-worth).
Some narcissists are covert, or inverted narcissists. As
co-dependents, they derive their Narcissistic Supply
from their relationships with classic narcissists.
Treatment and Prognosis
The common treatment for patients with Narcissistic
Personality Disorder (NPD) is talk therapy (mainly
psychodynamic psychotherapy or cognitive-behavioural
treatment modalities). Talk therapy is used to modify the
narcissist's antisocial, interpersonally exploitative, and
dysfunctional behaviours, often with some success.
Medication is prescribed to control and ameliorate
attendant conditions such as mood disorders or
obsessive-compulsive disorders.
The prognosis for an adult suffering from the
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is poor, though
his adaptation to life and to others can improve with
treatment.
[Bibliography:
Goldman, Howard H., Review of General Psychiatry,
fourth edition, 1995. Prentice-Hall International,
London.
Gelder, Michael, Gath, Dennis, Mayou, Richard,
Cowen, Philip (eds.), Oxford Textbook of Psychiatry,
third edition, 1996, reprinted 2000. Oxford University
Press, Oxford.
Vaknin, Sam, Malignant Self Love – Narcissism
Revisited, seventh revised impression, 1999-2007.
Narcissus Publications, Prague and Skopje.]
Return
The Narcissist's Entitlement of Routine
I hate routine. When I find myself doing the same things

over and over again, I get depressed. I oversleep, over-
eat, over-drink and, in general, engage in addictive,
impulsive and compulsive behaviours. This is my way
of re-introducing risk and excitement into what I
(emotionally) perceive to be a barren life.
The problem is that even the most exciting and varied
existence becomes routine after a while. Living in the
same country or apartment, meeting the same people,
doing essentially the same things (though with changing
content) – all "qualify" as stultifying rote.
I feel entitled to more. I feel it is my right – due to my
intellectual superiority – to lead a thrilling, rewarding,
kaleidoscopic life. I feel entitled to force life itself, or, at
least, people around me – to yield to my wishes and
needs, supreme among them the need for stimulating
variety.
This rejection of habit is part of a larger pattern of
aggressive entitlement. I feel that the very existence of a
sublime intellect (such as myself) warrants concessions
and allowances. Standing in line is a waste of time best
spent pursuing knowledge, inventing and creating. I
should avail myself of the best medical treatment
proffered by the most prominent medical authorities –
lest the asset that is I be lost to Mankind. I should not be
bothered with proofreading my articles (or even re-
reading them) – these lowly jobs best be assigned to the
less gifted. The devil is in paying precious attention to
details.
Entitlement is sometimes justified in a Picasso or an
Einstein. But I am neither. My achievements are
grotesquely incommensurate with my overwhelming
sense of entitlement. I am but a mediocre and
forgettable scribbler who, at the age of 39, is a colossal
under-achiever, if anything.
Of course, the feeling of supremacy often serves to
mask a cancerous complex of inferiority. Moreover, I
infect others with my projected grandiosity and their
feedback constitutes the edifice upon which I construct
my self-esteem. I regulate my sense of self-worth by
rigidly insisting that I am above the madding crowd
while deriving my Narcissistic Supply from this very
thus despised source.
But there is a second angle to this abhorrence of the
predictable. As a narcissist, I employ a host of
Emotional Involvement Prevention Mechanisms
(EIPM). Despising routine and avoiding it is one of
these mechanisms. Their function is to prevent me from
getting emotionally involved and, subsequently, hurt.
Their application results in an "approach-avoidance
repetition complex". The narcissist, fearing and loathing
intimacy, stability and security – yet craving them –
approaches and then avoids significant others or
important tasks in a rapid succession of apparently
inconsistent and disconnected behaviours.
Return
Pathological Narcissism
A Dysfunction or a Blessing?
Comments on recent research by Roy Baumeister.
Is pathological narcissism a blessing or a malediction?
The answer is: it depends. Healthy narcissism is a

mature, balanced love of oneself coupled with a stable
sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Healthy narcissism
implies knowledge of one's boundaries and a
proportionate and realistic appraisal of one's
achievements and traits.
Pathological narcissism is wrongly described as too

much healthy narcissism (or too much self-esteem).
These are two absolutely unrelated phenomena which,
regrettably, came to bear the same title. Confusing
pathological narcissism with self- esteem betrays a
fundamental ignorance of both.
Pathological narcissism involves an impaired,

dysfunctional, immature (True) Self coupled with a
compensatory fiction (the False Self). The sick
narcissist's sense of self-worth and self-esteem derive
entirely from audience feedback. The narcissist has no
self-esteem or self-worth of his own (no such ego
functions). In the absence of observers, the narcissist
shrivels to non-existence and feels dead. Hence the
narcissist's preying habits in his constant pursuit of
Narcissistic Supply. Pathological narcissism is an
addictive behavior.
Still, dysfunctions are reactions to abnormal

environments and situations (e.g., abuse, trauma,
smothering, etc.).
Paradoxically, his dysfunction allows the narcissist to

function. It compensates for lacks and deficiencies by
exaggerating tendencies and traits. It is like the tactile
sense of a blind person. In short: pathological
narcissism is a result of over-sensitivity, the repression
of overwhelming memories and experiences, and the
suppression of inordinately strong negative feelings
(e.g., hurt, envy, anger, or humiliation).
That the narcissist functions at all - is because of his

pathology and thanks to it. The alternative is complete
decompensation and integration.
In time, the narcissist learns how to leverage his

pathology, how to use it to his advantage, how to deploy
it in order to maximize benefits and utilities - in other
words, how to transform his curse into a blessing.
Narcissists are obsessed by delusions of fantastic

grandeur and superiority. As a result they are very
competitive. They are strongly compelled - where others
are merely motivated. They are driven, relentless,
tireless, and ruthless. They often make it to the top. But
even when they do not - they strive and fight and learn
and climb and create and think and devise and design
and conspire. Faced with a challenge - they are likely to
do better than non-narcissists.
Yet, we often find that narcissists abandon their efforts
in mid-stream, give up, vanish, lose interest, devalue
former pursuits, fail, or slump. Why is that?
Narcissists are prone to self-defeating and self-

destructive behaviors.
The Self-Punishing, Guilt-Purging Behaviors
These are intended to inflict punishment on the

narcissist and thus instantly relieve him of his
overwhelming anxiety.
This is very reminiscent of a compulsive-ritualistic

behavior. The narcissist feels guilty. It could be an
"ancient" guilt, a "sexual" guilt (Freud), or a "social"
guilt. In early life, the narcissist internalized and
introjected the voices of meaningful and authoritative
others - parents, role models, peers - that consistently
and convincingly judged him to be no good,
blameworthy, deserving of punishment or retaliation, or
corrupt.
The narcissist's life is thus transformed into an on-going

trial. The constancy of this trial, the never adjourning
tribunal is the punishment. It is a Kafkaesque "trial":
meaningless, undecipherable, never-ending, leading to
no verdict, subject to mysterious and fluid laws and
presided over by capricious judges.
Such a narcissist masochistically frustrates his deepest

desires and drives, obstructs his own efforts, alienates
his friends and sponsors, provokes figures in authority
to punish, demote, or ignore him, actively seeks and
solicits disappointment, failure, or mistreatment and
relishes them, incites anger or rejection, bypasses or
rejects opportunities, or engages in excessive self-
sacrifice.
In their book "Personality Disorders in Modern Life",

Theodore Millon and Roger Davis, describe the
diagnosis of "Masochistic or Self-Defeating Personality
Disorder", found in the appendix of the DSM III-R but
excluded from the DSM IV. While the narcissist is
rarely a full-fledged masochist, many a narcissist exhibit
some of the traits of this personality disorder.
The Extracting Behaviors
People with Personality Disorders (PDs) are very afraid

of real, mature, intimacy. Intimacy is formed not only
within a couple, but also in a workplace, in a
neighborhood, with friends, while collaborating on a
project. Intimacy is another word for emotional
involvement, which is the result of interactions in
constant and predictable (safe) propinquity.
PDs interpret intimacy as counter-dependence,

emotional strangulation, the snuffing of freedom, a kind
of death in installments. They are terrorized by it. To
avoid it, their self-destructive and self-defeating acts are
intended to dismantle the very foundation of a
successful relationship, a career, a project, or a
friendship. Narcissists feel elated and relieved after they
unshackle these "chains". They feel they broke a siege,
that they are liberated, free at last.
Read this:
The Relief of Being Abandoned

The Default Behaviors
We are all, to some degree, inertial, afraid of new

situations, new opportunities, new challenges, new
circumstances and new demands. Being healthy, being
successful, getting married, becoming a mother, or
someone's boss – often entail abrupt breaks with the
past. Some self-defeating behaviors are intended to
preserve the past, to restore it, to protect it from the
winds of change, to self-deceptively skirt promising
opportunities while seeming to embrace them.
Moreover, to the narcissist, a challenge, or even a

guaranteed eventual triumph, are meaningless in the
absence of onlookers. The narcissist needs an audience
to applaud, affirm, recoil, approve, admire, adore, fear,
or even detest him. He craves the attention and depends
on the Narcissistic Supply only others can provide. The
narcissist derives sustenance only from the outside - his
emotional innards are hollow and moribund.
The narcissist's enhanced performance is predicated on

the existence of a challenge (real or imaginary) and of
an audience. Baumeister usefully re-affirmed this
linkage, known to theoreticians since Freud.
The Narcissist as a Failure and a Loser
Three traits conspire to render the narcissist a failure

and a loser: his sense of entitlement, his haughtiness and
innate conviction of his own superiority, and his
aversion to routine.
The narcissist's sense of entitlement encourages his

indolence. He firmly believes that he should be spoon-
fed and that accomplishments and honors should be
handed to him on a silver platter, without any
commensurate effort on his part. His mere existence
justifies such exceptional treatment. Many narcissists
are under-qualified and lack skills because they can't be
bothered with the minutia of obtaining an academic
degree, professional training, or exams.
The narcissist's arrogance and belief that he is superior

to others, whom he typically holds in contempt - in
other words: the narcissist's grandiose fantasies -
hamper his ability to function in society. The cumulative
outcomes of this social dysfunction gradually transform
him into a recluse and an outcast. He is shunned by
colleagues, employers, neighbors, erstwhile friends,
and, finally, even by long-suffering family members
who tire of his tirades and rants.
Unable to work in a team, to compromise, to give credit

where due, and to strive towards long-term goals, the
narcissist - skilled and gifted as he may be - finds
himself unemployed and unemployable, his bad
reputation preceding him.
Even when offered a job or a business opportunity, the

narcissist recoils, bolts, and obstructs each and every
stage of the negotiations or the transaction.
But this passive-aggressive (negativistic and

masochistic) conduct has nothing to do with the
narcissist's aforementioned indolence. The narcissist is
not afraid of some forms of hard work. He invests
inordinate amounts of energy, forethought, planning,
zest, and sweat in securing narcissistic supply, for
instance.
The narcissist's sabotage of new employment or
business prospects is owing to his abhorrence of routine.
Narcissists feel trapped, shackled, and enslaved by the
quotidian, by the repetitive tasks that are inevitably
involved in fulfilling one's assignments. They hate the
methodical, step-by-step, long-term, approach.
Possessed of magical thinking, they'd rather wait for
miracles to happen. Jobs, business deals, and teamwork
require perseverance and tolerance of boredom which
the narcissist sorely lacks.
Life forces most narcissists into the hard slog of a

steady job (or succession of jobs). Such "unfortunate"
narcissists, coerced into a framework they resent, are
likely to act out and erupt in a series of self-destructive
and self-defeating acts (see above).
But there are other narcissists, the "luckier" ones, those

who can afford not to work. They laze about, indulge
themselves in a variety of idle and trivial pursuits, seek
entertainment and thrills wherever and whenever they
can, and while their lives away, at once content and
bitter: content with their lifestyle and the minimum
demands it imposes on them and bitter because they
haven't achieved more, they haven't reached the
pinnacle or their profession, they haven't become as rich
or famous or powerful as they deserve to be.
Return
The Narcissist's Confabulated Life
Confabulations are an important part of life. They serve

to heal emotional wounds or to prevent ones from being
inflicted in the first place. They prop-up the
confabulator's self-esteem, regulate his (or her) sense of
self-worth, and buttress his (or her) self-image. They
serve as organising principles in social interactions.
Father's wartime heroism, mother's youthful good
looks, one's oft-recounted exploits, erstwhile alleged
brilliance, and past purported sexual irresistibility – are
typical examples of white, fuzzy, heart-warming lies
wrapped around a shrivelled kernel of truth.
But the distinction between reality and fantasy is
rarely completely lost. Deep inside, the healthy
confabulator knows where facts end and wishful
thinking takes over. Father acknowledges he was no war
hero, though he did his share of fighting. Mother
understands she was no ravishing beauty, though she
may have been attractive. The confabulator realises that
his recounted exploits are overblown, his brilliance
exaggerated, and his sexual irresistibility a myth.
Such distinctions never rise to the surface because
everyone – the confabulator and his audience alike –
have a common interest to maintain the confabulation.
To challenge the integrity of the confabulator or the
veracity of his confabulations is to threaten the very
fabric of family and society. Human intercourse is built
around such entertaining deviations from the truth.
This is where the narcissist differs from others (from
"normal" people).
His very self is a piece of fiction concocted to fend off
hurt and to nurture the narcissist's grandiosity. He fails
in his "reality test" – the ability to distinguish the actual
from the imagined. The narcissist fervently believes in
his own infallibility, brilliance, omnipotence, heroism,
and perfection. He doesn't dare confront the truth and
admit it even to himself.
Moreover, he imposes his personal mythology on his
nearest and dearest. Spouse, children, colleagues,
friends, neighbours – sometimes even perfect strangers
– must abide by the narcissist's narrative or face his
wrath. The narcissist countenances no disagreement,
alternative points of view, or criticism. To him,
confabulation IS reality.
The coherence of the narcissist's dysfunctional and
precariously-balanced personality depends on the
plausibility of his stories and on their acceptance by his
Sources of Narcissistic Supply. The narcissist invests an
inordinate time in substantiating his tales, collecting
"evidence", defending his version of events, and in re-
interpreting reality to fit his scenario. As a result, most
narcissists are self-delusional, obstinate, opinionated,
and argumentative.
The narcissist's lies are not goal-orientated. This is
what makes his constant dishonesty both disconcerting
and incomprehensible. The narcissist lies at the drop of
a hat, needlessly, and almost ceaselessly. He lies in
order to avoid the Grandiosity Gap – when the abyss
between fact and (narcissistic) fiction becomes too
gaping to ignore.
The narcissist lies in order to preserve appearances,
uphold fantasies, support the tall (and impossible) tales
of his False Self and extract Narcissistic Supply from
unsuspecting sources, who are not yet on to him. To the
narcissist, confabulation is not merely a way of life –
but life itself.
We are all conditioned to let other indulge in pet
delusions and get away with white, not too egregious,
lies. The narcissist makes use of our socialisation. We
dare not confront or expose him, despite the
outlandishness of his claims, the improbability of his
stories, the implausibility of his alleged
accomplishments and conquests. We simply turn the
other cheek, or meekly avert our eyes, often
embarrassed.
Moreover, the narcissist makes clear, from the very
beginning, that it is his way or the highway. His
aggression – even violent streak – are close to the
surface. He may be charming in a first encounter – but
even then there are telltale signs of pent-up abuse. His
interlocutors sense this impending threat and avoid
conflict by acquiescing with the narcissist's fairy tales.
Thus he imposes his private universe and virtual reality
on his milieu – sometimes with disastrous
consequences.
Return
The Cult of the Narcissist
The narcissist is the guru at the centre of a cult. Like

other gurus, he demands complete obedience from his
flock: his spouse, his offspring, other family members,
friends, and colleagues. He feels entitled to adulation
and special treatment by his followers. He punishes the
wayward and the straying lambs. He enforces discipline,
adherence to his teachings, and common goals. The less
accomplished he is in reality – the more stringent his
mastery and the more pervasive the brainwashing.
The – often involuntary – members of the narcissist's
mini-cult inhabit a twilight zone of his own
construction. He imposes on them a shared psychosis,
replete with persecutory delusions, "enemies", mythical
narratives, and apocalyptic scenarios if he is flouted.
The narcissist's control is based on ambiguity,
unpredictability, fuzziness, and ambient abuse. His ever-
shifting whims exclusively define right versus wrong,
desirable and unwanted, what is to be pursued and what
to be avoided. He alone determines the rights and
obligations of his disciples and alters them at will.
The narcissist is a micro-manager. He exerts control
over the minutest details and behaviours. He punishes
severely and abuses withholders of information and
those who fail to conform to his wishes and goals.
The narcissist does not respect the boundaries and
privacy of his reluctant adherents. He ignores their
wishes and treats them as objects or instruments of
gratification. He seeks to control both situations and
people compulsively.
He strongly disapproves of others' personal autonomy
and independence. Even innocuous activities, such as
meeting a friend or visiting one's family require his
permission. Gradually, he isolates his nearest and
dearest until they are fully dependent on him
emotionally, sexually, financially, and socially.
He acts in a patronising and condescending manner
and criticises often. He alternates between emphasising
the minutest faults (devalues) and exaggerating the
talents, traits, and skills (idealises) of the members of
his cult. He is wildly unrealistic in his expectations –
which legitimises his subsequent abusive conduct.
The narcissist claims to be infallible, superior,
talented, skilful, omnipotent, and omniscient. He often
lies and confabulates to support these unfounded claims.
Within his cult, he expects awe, admiration, adulation,
and constant attention commensurate with his
outlandish stories and assertions. He reinterprets reality
to fit his fantasies.
His thinking is dogmatic, rigid, and doctrinaire. He
does not countenance free thought, pluralism, or free
speech and doesn't brook criticism and disagreement.
He demands – and often gets – complete trust and the
relegation to his capable hands of all decision-making.
He forces the participants in his cult to be hostile to
critics, the authorities, institutions, his personal enemies,
or the media – if they try to uncover his actions and
reveal the truth. He closely monitors and censors
information from the outside, exposing his captive
audience only to selective data and analyses.
The narcissist's cult is "missionary" and
"imperialistic". He is always on the lookout for new
recruits – his spouse's friends, his daughter's girlfriends,
his neighbours, new colleagues at work. He
immediately attempts to "convert" them to his "creed" –
to convince them how wonderful and admirable he is. In
other words, he tries to render them Sources of
Narcissistic Supply.
Often, his behaviour on these "recruiting missions" is
different to his conduct within the "cult". In the first
phases of wooing new admirers and proselytising to
potential "conscripts" – the narcissist is attentive,
compassionate, empathic, flexible, self-effacing, and
helpful. At home, among the "veterans" he is tyrannical,
demanding, wilful, opinionated, aggressive, and
exploitative.
As the leader of his congregation, the narcissist feels
entitled to special amenities and benefits not accorded
the "rank and file". He expects to be waited on hand and
foot, to make free use of everyone's money and dispose
of their assets liberally, and to be cynically exempt from
the rules that he himself established (if such violation is
pleasurable or gainful).
In extreme cases, the narcissist feels above the law –
any kind of law. This grandiose and haughty conviction
leads to criminal acts, incestuous or polygamous
relationships, and recurrent friction with the authorities.
Hence the narcissist's panicky and sometimes violent
reactions to "dropouts" from his cult. There's a lot going
on that the narcissist wants kept under wraps. Moreover,
the narcissist stabilises his fluctuating sense of self-
worth by deriving Narcissistic Supply from his victims.
Abandonment threatens the narcissist's precariously
balanced personality.
Add to that the narcissist's paranoid and schizoid
tendencies, his lack of introspective self-awareness, and
his stunted sense of humour (lack of self-deprecation)
and the risks to the grudging members of his cult are
clear.
The narcissist sees enemies and conspiracies
everywhere. He often casts himself as the heroic victim
(martyr) of dark and stupendous forces. In every
deviation from his tenets he espies malevolent and
ominous subversion. He, therefore, is bent on
disempowering his devotees. By any and all means.
The narcissist is dangerous.
Return
Bibliography
I. Online
The Narcissist and Psychopath in Society
The Narcissist and Psychopath as Criminals
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticab
use/message/5003
The Narcissist is Above the Law
use/message/4983
The Narcissist as Liar and Con-man
use/message/4951
Pathological Narcissism, Narcissistic Personality

disorder and Psychopathy
Does the Narcissist Have a Multiple Personality

(Dissociative Identity Disorder)?
use/message/4950
Narcissists as Drama Queens
use/message/4948
The Narcissist as Know-it-all
use/message/4945
The Narcissist as VAMPIRE or MACHINE
use/message/4944
Narcissists and Psychopaths Devalue Their

Psychotherapists
use/message/4939
Violent, Vindictive, Sadistic, and Psychopathic

Narcissists
use/message/4938
Portrait of the Narcissist as a Young Man
use/message/5048
Grandiosity, Fantasies, and Narcissism
use/message/4923
Narcissists and Emotions
use/message/5248
Narcissists and Mood Disorders
use/message/5067
II. Print
1. Alford, C. Fred. Narcissism: Socrates, the Frankfurt

School and Psychoanalytic Theory. New Haven and
London, Yale University Press, 1988
2. Devereux, George. Basic Problems of Ethno-
Psychiatry. University of Chicago Press, 1980
3. Fairbairn, W. R. D. An Object Relations Theory of
the Personality. New York, Basic Books, 1954
4. Freud S. Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality
[1905]. Standard Edition of the Complete
Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 7.
London, Hogarth Press, 1964
5. Freud, S. On Narcissism. Standard Ed. Vol. 14, pp.
73-107
6. Goldman, Howard H. (Ed.). Review of General
Psychiatry. 4th Ed. London, Prentice Hall
International, 1995
7. Golomb, Elan. Trapped in the Mirror: Adult Children
of Narcissists in Their Struggle for Self. Quill, 1995
8. Greenberg, Jay R. and Mitchell, Stephen A. Object
Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. Cambridge,
Mass., Harvard University Press, 1983
9. Grunberger, Bela. Narcissism: Psychoanalytic
Essays. New York, International Universities Press,
1979
10. Guntrip, Harry. Personality Structure and
Human Interaction. New York, International
Universities Press, 1961
11. Horowitz M. J. Sliding Meanings: A Defence
against Threat in Narcissistic Personalities.
International Journal of Psychoanalytic
Psychotherapy, 1975; 4:167
12. Horovitz M. J. Stress Response Syndromes:
PTSD, Grief and Adjustment Disorders. 3rd Ed. New
York, NY University Press, 1998
13. Jacobson, Edith. The Self and the Object
World. New York, International Universities Press,
1964
14. Jung, C.G. Collected Works. G. Adler, M.
Fordham and H. Read (Eds.). 21 volumes. Princeton
University Press, 1960-1983
15. Kernberg O. Borderline Conditions and
Pathological Narcissism. New York, Jason Aronson,
1975
16. Klein, Melanie. The Writings of Melanie
Klein. Roger Money-Kyrle (Ed.). 4 Vols. New York,
Free Press, 1964-75
17. Kohut H. The Chicago Institute Lectures
1972-1976. Marian and Paul Tolpin (Eds.). Analytic
Press, 1998
18. Kohut M. The Analysis of the Self. New
York, International Universities Press, 1971
19. Lasch, Christopher. The Culture of
Narcissism. New York, Warner Books, 1979
20. Levine, J. D., and Weiss, Rona H. The
Dynamics and Treatment of Alcoholism. Jason
Aronson, 1994
21. Lowen, Alexander. Narcissism: Denial of the
True Self. Touchstone Books, 1997
22. Millon, Theodore (and Roger D. Davis,
contributor). Disorders of Personality: DSM-IV and
Beyond. 2nd ed. New York, John Wiley and Sons,
1995
23. Millon, Theodore. Personality Disorders in
Modern Life. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 2000
24. Riso, Don Richard. Personality Types: Using
the Enneagram for Self-Discovery. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin 1987
25. Roningstam, Elsa F. (Ed.). Disorders of
Narcissism: Diagnostic, Clinical, and Empirical
Implications. American Psychiatric Press, 1998
26. Rothstein, Arnold. The Narcissistic Pursuit of
Reflection. 2nd revised Ed. New York, International
Universities Press, 1984
27. Schwartz, Lester. Narcissistic Personality
Disorders – A Clinical Discussion. Journal of
American Psychoanalytic Association – 22 [1974]:
292-305
28. Salant-Schwartz, Nathan. Narcissism and
Character Transformation. Inner City Books, 1985 –
pp. 90-91
29. Stern, Daniel. The Interpersonal World of the
Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and
Developmental Psychology. New York, Basic Books,
1985
30. Vaknin, Sam. Malignant Self Love –
Narcissism Revisited. Skopje and Prague, Narcissus
Publications, 2007
31. Zweig, Paul. The Heresy of Self Love: A
Study of Subversive Individualism. New York, Basic
Books, 1968
Narcissists
And Psychopaths
In the Workplace
Question:
The narcissist turns the workplace into a duplicitous

hell. What to do?
Answer:
To a narcissistic employer, the members of his "staff"

are Secondary Sources of Narcissistic Supply. Their role
is to accumulate the supply (remember events that
support the grandiose self-image of the narcissist) and to
regulate the Narcissistic Supply of the narcissist during
dry spells - to adulate, adore, admire, agree, provide
attention and approval, and, generally, serve as an
audience to him.
The staff (or should we say "stuff"?) is supposed to

remain passive. The narcissist is not interested in
anything but the simplest function of mirroring. When
the mirror acquires a personality and a life of its own,
the narcissist is incensed. When independent minded, an
employee might be in danger of being sacked by his
narcissistic employer (an act which demonstrates the
employer's omnipotence).
The employee's presumption to be the employer's equal

by trying to befriend him (friendship is possible only
among equals) injures the employer narcissistically. He
is willing to accept his employees as underlings, whose
very position serves to support his grandiose fantasies.
But his grandiosity is so tenuous and rests on such

fragile foundations, that any hint of equality,
disagreement or need (any intimation that the narcissist
"needs" friends, for instance) threatens the narcissist
profoundly. The narcissist is exceedingly insecure. It is
easy to destabilise his impromptu "personality". His
reactions are merely in self-defence.
Classic narcissistic behaviour is when idealisation is

followed by devaluation. The devaluing attitude
develops as a result of disagreements or simply because
time has eroded the employee's capacity to serve as a
FRESH Source of Supply.
The veteran employee, now taken for granted by his

narcissistic employer, becomes uninspiring as a source
of adulation, admiration and attention. The narcissist
always seeks new thrills and stimuli.
The narcissist is notorious for his low threshold of

resistance to boredom. His behaviour is impulsive and
his biography tumultuous precisely because of his need
to introduce uncertainty and risk to what he regards as
"stagnation" or "slow death" (i.e., routine). Most
interactions in the workplace are part of the rut – and
thus constitute a reminder of this routine – deflating the
narcissist's grandiose fantasies.
Narcissists do many unnecessary, wrong and even

dangerous things in pursuit of the stabilisation of their
inflated self-image.
Narcissists feel suffocated by intimacy, or by the
constant reminders of the REAL, nitty-gritty world out
there. It reduces them, makes them realise the
Grandiosity Gap between their fantasies and reality. It is
a threat to the precarious balance of their personality
structures ("false" and invented) and treated by them as
a menace.
Narcissists forever shift the blame, pass the buck, and

engage in cognitive dissonance. They "pathologize" the
other, foster feelings of guilt and shame in her, demean,
debase and humiliate in order to preserve their sense of
superiority.
Narcissists are pathological liars. They think nothing of

it because their very self is false, their own
confabulation.
Here are a few useful guidelines:
• Never disagree with the narcissist or contradict

him;
• Never offer him any intimacy;
• Look awed by whatever attribute matters to him

(for instance: by his professional achievements
or by his good looks, or by his success with
women and so on);
• Never remind him of life out there and if you do,

connect it somehow to his sense of grandiosity.
You can aggrandize even your office supplies,
the most mundane thing conceivable by saying:
"These are the BEST art materials ANY
workplace is going to have", "We get them
EXCLUSIVELY", etc.;
• Do not make any comment, which might directly

or indirectly impinge on the narcissist's self-
image, omnipotence, superior judgement,
omniscience, skills, capabilities, professional
record, or even omnipresence. Bad sentences
start with: "I think you overlooked … made a
mistake here … you don't know … do you know
… you were not here yesterday so … you cannot
… you should … (interpreted as rude
imposition, narcissists react very badly to
perceived restrictions placed on their freedom)
… I (never mention the fact that you are a
separate, independent entity, narcissists regard
others as extensions of their selves)…" You get
the gist of it.
Manage your narcissistic boss. Notice patterns in his

bullying. Is he more aggressive on Monday mornings -
and more open to suggestions on Friday afternoon? Is
he amenable to flattery? Can you modify his conduct by
appealing to his morality, superior knowledge, good
manners, cosmopolitanism, or upbringing?
Manipulating the narcissist is the only way to survive in
such a tainted workplace.
Can the narcissist be harnessed? Can his energies be

channeled productively?
This would be a deeply flawed – and even dangerous –

"advice". Various management gurus purport to teach us
how to harness this force of nature known as malignant
or pathological narcissism. Narcissists are driven,
visionary, ambitious, exciting and productive, says
Michael Maccoby, for instance. To ignore such a
resource is a criminal waste. All we need to do is learn
how to "handle" them.
Yet, this prescription is either naive or disingenuous.

Narcissists cannot be "handled", or "managed", or
"contained", or "channeled". They are, by definition,
incapable of team work. They lack empathy, are
exploitative, envious, haughty and feel entitled, even if
such a feeling is commensurate only with their
grandiose fantasies and when their accomplishments are
meager.
Narcissists dissemble, conspire, destroy and self-

destruct. Their drive is compulsive, their vision rarely
grounded in reality, their human relations a calamity. In
the long run, there is no enduring benefit to dancing
with narcissists – only ephemeral and, often, fallacious,
"achievements".
Return
Narcissism in the Boardroom
The perpetrators of the recent spate of financial frauds

in the USA acted with callous disregard for both their
employees and shareholders – not to mention other
stakeholders. Psychologists have often remote-
diagnosed them as "malignant, pathological narcissists".
Narcissists are driven by the need to uphold and
maintain a False Self – a concocted, grandiose, and
demanding psychological construct typical of the
Narcissistic Personality Disorder. The False Self is
projected to the world in order to garner Narcissistic
Supply – adulation, admiration, or even notoriety and
infamy. Any kind of attention is usually deemed by
narcissists to be preferable to obscurity.
The False Self is suffused with fantasies of perfection,
grandeur, brilliance, infallibility, immunity, significance,
omnipotence, omnipresence, and omniscience. To be a
narcissist is to be convinced of a great, inevitable
personal destiny. The narcissist is preoccupied with
ideal love, the construction of brilliant, revolutionary
scientific theories, the composition or authoring or
painting of the greatest work of art, the founding of a
new school of thought, the attainment of fabulous
wealth, the reshaping of a nation or a conglomerate, and
so on. The narcissist never sets realistic goals to himself.
He is forever preoccupied with fantasies of uniqueness,
record breaking, or breathtaking achievements. His
verbosity reflects this propensity.
Reality is, naturally, quite different and this gives rise
to a Grandiosity Gap. The demands of the False Self are
never satisfied by the narcissist's accomplishments,
standing, wealth, clout, sexual prowess, or knowledge.
The narcissist's grandiosity and sense of entitlement are
equally incommensurate with his achievements.
To bridge the Grandiosity Gap, the malignant
(pathological) narcissist resorts to shortcuts. These very
often lead to fraud.
The narcissist cares only about appearances. What
matters to him are the facade of wealth and its attendant
social status and Narcissistic Supply. Witness the
travestied extravagance of Tyco's Denis Kozlowski.
Media attention only exacerbates the narcissist's
addiction and makes it incumbent on him to go to ever-
wilder extremes to secure uninterrupted supply from
this source.
The narcissist lacks empathy – the ability to put
himself in other people's shoes. He does not recognise
boundaries – personal, corporate, or legal. Everything
and everyone are to him mere instruments, extensions,
objects unconditionally and uncomplainingly available
in his pursuit of narcissistic gratification.
This makes the narcissist perniciously exploitative. He
uses, abuses, devalues, and discards even his nearest
and dearest in the most chilling manner. The narcissist is
utility – driven, obsessed with his overwhelming need to
reduce his anxiety and regulate his labile sense of self-
worth by securing a constant supply of his drug –
attention. American executives acted without
compunction when they raided their employees' pension
funds – as did Robert Maxwell a generation earlier in
Britain.
The narcissist is convinced of his superiority –
cerebral or physical. To his mind, he is a Gulliver
hamstrung by a horde of narrow-minded and envious
Lilliputians. The dotcom "new economy" was infested
with "visionaries" with a contemptuous attitude towards
the mundane: profits, business cycles, conservative
economists, doubtful journalists, and cautious analysts.
Yet, deep inside, the narcissist is painfully aware of
his addiction to others – their attention, admiration,
applause, and affirmation. He despises himself for being
thus dependent. He hates people the same way a drug
addict hates his pusher. He wishes to "put them in their
place", humiliate them, demonstrate to them how
inadequate and imperfect they are in comparison to his
regal self and how little he craves or needs them.
The narcissist regards himself as one would an
expensive present, a gift to his company, to his family,
to his neighbours, to his colleagues, to his country. This
firm conviction of his inflated importance makes him
feel entitled to special treatment, special favours, special
outcomes, concessions, subservience, immediate
gratification, obsequiousness, and lenience. It also
makes him feel immune to mortal laws and somehow
divinely protected and insulated from the inevitable
consequences of his deeds and misdeeds.
The self-destructive narcissist plays the role of the
"bad guy" (or "bad girl"). But even this is within the
traditional social roles cartoonishly exaggerated by the
narcissist to attract attention. Men are likely to
emphasise intellect, power, aggression, money, or social
status. Narcissistic women are likely to emphasise body,
looks, charm, sexuality, feminine "traits", homemaking,
children and childrearing.
Punishing the wayward narcissist is a veritable catch-
22.
A jail term is useless as a deterrent if it only serves to
focus attention on the narcissist. Being infamous is
second best to being famous – and far preferable to
being ignored. The only way to effectively punish a
narcissist is to withhold Narcissistic Supply from him
and thus to prevent him from becoming a notorious
celebrity.
Given a sufficient amount of media exposure, book
contracts, talk shows, lectures, and public attention – the
narcissist may even consider the whole grisly affair to
be emotionally rewarding. To the narcissist, freedom,
wealth, social status, family, vocation – are all means to
an end. And the end is attention. If he can secure
attention by being the big bad wolf – the narcissist
unhesitatingly transforms himself into one. Lord Archer,
for instance, seems to be positively basking in the media
circus provoked by his prison diaries.
The narcissist does not victimise, plunder, terrorise
and abuse others in a cold, calculating manner. He does
so offhandedly, as a manifestation of his genuine
character. To be truly "guilty" one needs to intend, to
deliberate, to contemplate one's choices and then to
choose one's acts. The narcissist does none of these.
Thus, punishment breeds in him surprise, hurt and
seething anger. The narcissist is stunned by society's
insistence that he should be held accountable for his
deeds and penalised accordingly. He feels wronged,
baffled, injured, the victim of bias, discrimination and
injustice. He rebels and rages.
Depending upon the pervasiveness of his magical
thinking, the narcissist may feel besieged by
overwhelming powers, forces cosmic and intrinsically
ominous. He may develop compulsive rites to fend off
this "bad", unwarranted, persecutory influences.
The narcissist, very much the infantile outcome of
stunted personal development, engages in magical
thinking. He feels omnipotent, that there is nothing he
couldn't do or achieve if only he sets his mind to it. He
feels omniscient – he rarely admits to ignorance and
regards his intuitions and intellect as founts of objective
data.
Thus, narcissists are haughtily convinced that
introspection is a more important and more efficient
(not to mention easier to accomplish) method of
obtaining knowledge than the systematic study of
outside sources of information in accordance with strict
and tedious curricula. Narcissists are "inspired" and they
despise hamstrung technocrats.
To some extent, they feel omnipresent because they
are either famous or about to become famous or because
their product is selling or is being manufactured
globally. Deeply immersed in their delusions of
grandeur, they firmly believe that their acts have – or
will have – a great influence not only on their firm, but
on their country, or even on Mankind. Having mastered
the manipulation of their human environment – they are
convinced that they will always "get away with it". They
develop hubris and a false sense of immunity.
Narcissistic immunity is the (erroneous) feeling,
harboured by the narcissist, that he is impervious to the
consequences of his actions, that he will never be
effected by the results of his own decisions, opinions,
beliefs, deeds and misdeeds, acts, inaction, or
membership of certain groups, that he is above reproach
and punishment, that, magically, he is protected and will
miraculously be saved at the last moment. Hence the
audacity, simplicity, and transparency of some of the
fraud and corporate looting in the 1990's. Narcissists
rarely bother to cover their traces, so great is their
disdain and conviction that they are above mortal laws
and wherewithal.
What are the sources of this unrealistic appraisal of
situations and events?
The False Self is a childish response to abuse and
trauma. Abuse is not limited to sexual molestation or
beatings. Smothering, doting, pampering, over-
indulgence, treating the child as an extension of the
parent, not respecting the child's boundaries, and
burdening the child with excessive expectations are also
forms of abuse.
The child reacts by constructing False Self that is
possessed of everything it needs in order to prevail:
unlimited and instantaneously available Harry Potter-
like powers and wisdom. The False Self, this Superman,
is indifferent to abuse and punishment. This way, the
child's True Self is shielded from the toddler's harsh
reality.
This artificial, maladaptive separation between a
vulnerable (but not punishable) True Self and a
punishable (but invulnerable) False Self is an effective
mechanism. It isolates the child from the unjust,
capricious, emotionally dangerous world that he
occupies. But, at the same time, it fosters in him a false
sense of "nothing can happen to me, because I am not
here, I am not available to be punished, hence I am
immune to punishment".
The comfort of false immunity is also yielded by the
narcissist's sense of entitlement. In his grandiose
delusions, the narcissist is sui generis, a gift to
humanity, a precious, fragile, object. Moreover, the
narcissist is convinced both that this uniqueness is
immediately discernible – and that it gives him special
rights. The narcissist feels that he is protected by some
cosmological law pertaining to "endangered species".
He is convinced that his future contribution to others –
his firm, his country, humanity – should and does
exempt him from the mundane: daily chores, boring
jobs, recurrent tasks, personal exertion, orderly
investment of resources and efforts, laws and
regulations, social conventions, and so on.
The narcissist is entitled to a "special treatment": high
living standards, constant and immediate catering to his
needs, the eradication of any friction with the humdrum
and the routine, an all-engulfing absolution of his sins,
fast track privileges (to higher education, or in his
encounters with bureaucracies, for instance).
Punishment, trusts the narcissist, is for ordinary people,
where no great loss to humanity is involved.
Narcissists are possessed of inordinate abilities to
charm, to convince, to seduce, and to persuade. Many of
them are gifted orators and intellectually endowed.
Many of them work in politics, the media, fashion, show
business, the arts, medicine, or business, and serve as
religious leaders.
By virtue of their standing in the community, their
charisma, or their ability to find the willing scapegoats,
they do get exempted many times. Having recurrently
"got away with it" – they develop a theory of personal
immunity, founded upon some kind of societal and even
cosmic "order" in which certain people are above
punishment.
But there is a fourth, simpler, explanation. The
narcissist lacks self-awareness. Divorced from his True
Self, unable to empathise (to understand what it is like
to be someone else), unwilling to constrain his actions
to cater to the feelings and needs of others – the
narcissist is in a constant dreamlike state.
To the narcissist, his life is unreal, like watching an
autonomously unfolding movie. The narcissist is a mere
spectator, mildly interested, greatly entertained at times.
He does not "own" his actions. He, therefore, cannot
understand why he should be punished and when he is,
he feels grossly wronged.
So convinced is the narcissist that he is destined to
great things – that he refuses to accept setbacks, failures
and punishments. He regards them as temporary, as the
outcomes of someone else's errors, as part of the future
mythology of his rise to power/brilliance/wealth/ideal
love, etc. Being punished is a diversion of his precious
energy and resources from the all-important task of
fulfilling his mission in life.
The narcissist is pathologically envious of people and
believes that they are equally envious of him. He is
paranoid, on guard, ready to fend off an imminent
attack. A punishment to the narcissist is a major surprise
and a nuisance but it also validates his suspicion that he
is being persecuted. It proves to him that strong forces
are arrayed against him.
He tells himself that people, envious of his
achievements and humiliated by them, are out to get
him. He constitutes a threat to the accepted order. When
required to pay for his misdeeds, the narcissist is always
disdainful and bitter and feels misunderstood by his
inferiors.
Cooked books, corporate fraud, bending the (GAAP or
other) rules, sweeping problems under the carpet, over-
promising, making grandiose claims (the "vision thing")
– are hallmarks of a narcissist in action. When social
cues and norms encourage such behaviour rather than
inhibit it – in other words, when such behaviour elicits
abundant Narcissistic Supply – the pattern is reinforced
and become entrenched and rigid. Even when
circumstances change, the narcissist finds it difficult to
adapt, shed his routines, and replace them with new
ones. He is trapped in his past success. He becomes a
swindler.
But pathological narcissism is not an isolated
phenomenon. It is embedded in our contemporary
culture. The West's is a narcissistic civilization. It
upholds narcissistic values and penalises alternative
value-systems. From an early age, children are taught to
avoid self-criticism, to deceive themselves regarding
their capacities and attainments, to feel entitled, and to
exploit others.
As Lilian Katz observed in her important paper,
"Distinctions between Self-Esteem and Narcissism:
Implications for Practice", published by the Educational
Resources Information Centre, the line between
enhancing self-esteem and fostering narcissism is often
blurred by educators and parents.
Both Christopher Lasch in "The Culture of
Narcissism" and Theodore Millon in his books about
personality disorders, singled out American society as
narcissistic. Litigiousness may be the flip side of an
inane sense of entitlement. Consumerism is built on this
common and communal lie of "I can do anything I want
and possess everything I desire if I only apply myself to
it" and on the pathological envy it fosters.
Not surprisingly, narcissistic disorders are more
common among men than among women. This may be
because narcissism conforms to masculine social mores
and to the prevailing ethos of capitalism. Ambition,
achievements, hierarchy, ruthlessness, drive – are both
social values and narcissistic male traits. Social thinkers
like the aforementioned Lasch speculated that modern
American culture – a self-centred one – increases the
rate of incidence of the Narcissistic Personality
Disorder.
Otto Kernberg, a notable scholar of personality
disorders, confirmed Lasch's intuition: "Society can
make serious psychological abnormalities, which
already exist in some percentage of the population,
seem to be at least superficially appropriate."
In their book "Personality Disorders in Modern Life",
Theodore Millon and Roger Davis state, as a matter of
fact, that pathological narcissism was once the preserve
of "the royal and the wealthy" and that it "seems to have
gained prominence only in the late twentieth century".
Narcissism, according to them, may be associated with
"higher levels of Maslow's hierarchy of needs …
Individuals in less advantaged nations … are too busy
trying (to survive) … to be arrogant and grandiose".
They – like Lasch before them – attribute pathological
narcissism to "a society that stresses individualism and
self-gratification at the expense of community, namely
the United States". They assert that the disorder is more
prevalent among certain professions with "star power"
or respect. "In an individualistic culture, the narcissist
is 'God's gift to the world'. In a collectivist society, the
narcissist is 'God's gift to the collective'."
Millon quotes Warren and Caponi's "The Role of
Culture in the Development of Narcissistic Personality
Disorders in America, Japan and Denmark":
"Individualistic narcissistic structures of self-regard
(in individualistic societies) … are rather self-contained
and independent … (In collectivist cultures) narcissistic
configurations of the we-self … denote self-esteem
derived from strong identification with the reputation
and honour of the family, groups, and others in
hierarchical relationships."
Still, there are malignant narcissists among
subsistence farmers in Africa, nomads in the Sinai
desert, day labourers in East Europe, and intellectuals
and socialites in Manhattan. Malignant narcissism is all-
pervasive and independent of culture and society. It is
true, though, that the way pathological narcissism
manifests and is experienced is dependent on the
particulars of societies and cultures.
In some cultures, it is encouraged, in others
suppressed. In some societies it is channelled against
minorities – in others it is tainted with paranoia. In
collectivist societies, it may be projected onto the
collective, in individualistic societies, it is an
individual's trait.
Yet, can families, organisations, ethnic groups,
churches, and even whole nations be safely described as
"narcissistic" or "pathologically self-absorbed"? Can we
talk about a "corporate culture of narcissism"?
Human collectives – states, firms, households,
institutions, political parties, cliques, bands – acquire a
life and a character all their own. The longer the
association or affiliation of the members, the more
cohesive and conformist the inner dynamics of the
group, the more persecutory or numerous its enemies,
competitors, or adversaries, the more intensive the
physical and emotional experiences of the individuals it
is comprised of, the stronger the bonds of locale,
language, and history – the more rigorous might an
assertion of a common pathology be.
Such an all-pervasive and extensive pathology
manifests itself in the behaviour of each and every
member. It is a defining – though often implicit or
underlying – mental structure. It has explanatory and
predictive powers. It is recurrent and invariable – a
pattern of conduct melding distorted cognition and
stunted emotions. And it is often vehemently denied.
Return
The Professions of the Narcissist
The narcissist naturally gravitates towards those

professions which guarantee the abundant and
uninterrupted provision of Narcissistic Supply. He seeks
to interact with people from a position of authority,
advantage, or superiority. He thus elicits their automatic
admiration, adulation, and affirmation – or, failing that,
their fear and obedience.
Several vocations meet these requirements: teaching,

the clergy, show business, corporate management, the
medical professions, the military, law enforcement
agencies, politics, and sports. It is safe to predict that
narcissists would be over-represented in these
occupations.
The cerebral narcissist is likely to emphasize his

intellectual prowess and accomplishments (real and
imaginary) in an attempt to solicit supply from awe-
struck students, devoted parishioners, admiring voters,
obsequious subordinates, or dependent patients. His
somatic counterpart derives his sense of self-worth from
body building, athletic achievements, tests of resilience
or endurance, and sexual conquests.
The narcissistic medical doctor or mental health

professional and his patients, the narcissistic guide,
teacher, or mentor and his students, the narcissistic
leader, guru, pundit, or psychic and his followers or
admirers, and the narcissistic business tycoon, boss, or
employer and his underlings – all are instances of
Pathological Narcissistic Spaces.
This is a worrisome state of affairs. Narcissists are liars.

They misrepresent their credentials, knowledge, talents,
skills, and achievements. A narcissist medical doctor
would rather let patients die than expose his ignorance.
A narcissistic therapist often traumatizes his clients with
his acting out, rage, exploitativeness, and lack of
empathy. Narcissistic businessmen bring ruin on their
firms and employees.
Moreover, even when all is "well", the narcissist's

relationship with his sycophants is abusive. He
perceives others as objects, mere instruments of
gratification, dispensable and interchangeable. An
addict, the narcissist tends to pursue an ever-larger dose
of adoration, and an ever-bigger fix of attention, while
gradually losing what's left of his moral constraints.
When his sources become weary, rebellious, tired,

bored, disgusted, repelled, or plainly amused by the
narcissist's incessant dependence, his childish craving
for attention, his exaggerated or even paranoid fears
which lead to obsessive-compulsive behaviours, and his
"drama queen" temper tantrums - he resorts to
emotional extortion, straight blackmail, abuse, or
misuse of his authority, and criminal or antisocial
conduct. If these fail, the narcissist devalues and
discards the very people he so idealized and cherished
only a short while before.
As opposed to their "normal" colleagues or peers,

narcissists in authority lack empathy and ethical
standards. Thus, they are prone to immorally, cynically,
callously and consistently abuse their position. Their
socialisation process – usually the product of
problematic early relationships with Primary Objects
(parents, or caregivers) – is often perturbed and results
in social dysfunctioning.
Nor is the narcissist deterred by possible punishment or

regards himself subject to Man-made laws. His sense of
entitlement coupled with the conviction of his own
superiority lead him to believe in his invincibility,
invulnerability, immunity, and divinity. The narcissist
holds human edicts, rules, and regulations in disdain and
human penalties in disdain. He regards human needs
and emotions as weaknesses to be predatorily exploited.
Return
Trauma
Abuse
Torture
An Overview
What is Abuse?
Violence in the family often follows other forms of

more subtle and long-term abuse: verbal, emotional,
psychological sexual, or financial.
It is closely correlated with alcoholism, drug

consumption, intimate-partner homicide, teen
pregnancy, infant and child mortality, spontaneous
abortion, reckless behaviours, suicide, and the onset of
mental health disorders.
Most abusers and batterers are males – but a significant

minority are women. This being a "Women's Issue", the
problem was swept under the carpet for generations and
only recently has it come to public awareness. Yet, even
today, society – for instance, through the court and the
mental health systems – largely ignores domestic
violence and abuse in the family. This induces feelings
of shame and guilt in the victims and "legitimizes" the
role of the abuser.
Violence in the family is mostly spousal – one spouse

beating, raping, or otherwise physically harming and
torturing the other. But children are also and often
victims – either directly, or indirectly. Other vulnerable
familial groups include the elderly and the disabled.
Abuse and violence cross geographical and cultural

boundaries and social and economic strata. It is
common among the rich and the poor, the well-educated
and the less so, the young and the middle-aged, city
dwellers and rural folk. It is a universal phenomenon.
Abusers exploit, lie, insult, demean, ignore (the "silent
treatment"), manipulate, and control.
There are many ways to abuse. To love too much is to

abuse. It is tantamount to treating someone as an
extension, an object, or an instrument of gratification.
To be over-protective, not to respect privacy, to be
brutally honest, with a sadistic sense of humour, or
consistently tactless – is to abuse.
To expect too much, to denigrate, to ignore – are all

modes of abuse. There is physical abuse, verbal abuse,
psychological abuse, sexual abuse. The list is long. Most
abusers abuse surreptitiously. They are "stealth abusers".
You have to actually live with one in order to witness
the abuse.
There are four important categories of abuse:
I. Overt Abuse
The open and explicit abuse of another person.

Threatening, coercing, beating, lying, berating,
demeaning, chastising, insulting, humiliating,
exploiting, ignoring ("silent treatment"), devaluing,
unceremoniously discarding, verbal abuse, physical
abuse and sexual abuse are all forms of overt abuse.
II. Covert or Controlling Abuse
Abuse is almost entirely about control. It is often a

primitive and immature reaction to life circumstances in
which the abuser (usually in his childhood) was
rendered helpless. It is about re-exerting one's identity,
re-establishing predictability, mastering the environment
– human and physical.
The bulk of abusive behaviours can be traced to this

panicky reaction to the remote potential for loss of
control. Many abusers are hypochondriacs (and difficult
patients) because they are afraid to lose control over
their body, its looks and its proper functioning. They are
obsessive-compulsive in an effort to subdue their
physical habitat and render it foreseeable. They stalk
people and harass them as a means of "being in touch" –
another form of control.
To the abuser, nothing exists outside himself.

Meaningful others are extensions, internal,
assimilated, objects – not external ones. Thus, losing
control over a significant other – is equivalent to losing
control of a limb, or of one's brain. It is terrifying.
Independent or disobedient people evoke in the abuser

the realization that something is wrong with his
worldview, that he is not the centre of the world or its
cause and that he cannot control what, to him, are
internal representations.
To the abuser, losing control means going insane.

Because other people are mere elements in the abuser's
mind – being unable to manipulate them literally means
losing it (his mind). Imagine, if you suddenly were to
find out that you cannot manipulate your memories or
control your thoughts... Nightmarish!
In his frantic efforts to maintain control or re-assert it,

the abuser resorts to a myriad of fiendishly inventive
stratagems and mechanisms. Here is a partial list:
Unpredictability and Uncertainty
The abuser acts unpredictably, capriciously,

inconsistently and irrationally. This serves to render
others dependent upon the next twist and turn of the
abuser, his next inexplicable whim, upon his next
outburst, denial, or smile.
The abuser makes sure that HE is the only reliable

element in the lives of his nearest and dearest – by
shattering the rest of their world through his seemingly
insane behaviour. He perpetuates his stable presence in
their lives – by destabilizing their own.
TIP
Refuse to accept such behaviour. Demand reasonably

predictable and rational actions and reactions. Insist on
respect for your boundaries, predilections, preferences,
and priorities.
Disproportional Reactions
One of the favourite tools of manipulation in the

abuser's arsenal is the disproportionality of his reactions.
He reacts with supreme rage to the slightest slight. Or,
he would punish severely for what he perceives to be an
offence against him, no matter how minor. Or, he would
throw a temper tantrum over any discord or
disagreement, however gently and considerately
expressed. Or, he would act inordinately attentive,
charming and tempting (even over-sexed, if need be).
This ever-shifting code of conduct and the unusually

harsh and arbitrarily applied penalties are premeditated.
The victims are kept in the dark. Neediness and
dependence on the source of "justice" meted and
judgment passed – on the abuser – are thus guaranteed.
TIP
Demand a just and proportional treatment. Reject or

ignore unjust and capricious behaviour.
If you are up to the inevitable confrontation, react in

kind. Let him taste some of his own medicine.
Dehumanization and Objectification (Abuse)
People have a need to believe in the empathic skills and

basic good-heartedness of others. By dehumanizing and
objectifying people – the abuser attacks the very
foundations of human interaction. This is the "alien"
aspect of abusers – they may be excellent imitations of
fully formed adults but they are emotionally absent
and immature.
Abuse is so horrid, so repulsive, so phantasmagoric –

that people recoil in terror. It is then, with their defences
absolutely down, that they are the most susceptible and
vulnerable to the abuser's control. Physical,
psychological, verbal and sexual abuse are all forms of
dehumanization and objectification.
TIP
Never show your abuser that you are afraid of him. Do

not negotiate with bullies. They are insatiable. Do not
succumb to blackmail.
If things get rough – disengage, involve law
enforcement officers, friends and colleagues, or threaten
him (legally).
Do not keep your abuse a secret. Secrecy is the abuser's

weapon.
Never give him a second chance. React with your full

arsenal to the first transgression.
Abuse of Information
From the first moments of an encounter with another

person, the abuser is on the prowl. He collects
information. The more he knows about his potential
victim – the better able he is to coerce, manipulate,
charm, extort or convert it "to the cause". The abuser
does not hesitate to misuse the information he gleaned,
regardless of its intimate nature or the circumstances in
which he obtained it. This is a powerful tool in his
armory.
TIP
Be guarded. Don't be too forthcoming in a first or casual

meeting. Gather intelligence.
Be yourself. Don't misrepresent your wishes,

boundaries, preferences, priorities, and red lines.
Do not behave inconsistently. Do not go back on your

word. Be firm and resolute.
Impossible Situations
The abuser engineers impossible, dangerous,

unpredictable, unprecedented, or highly specific
situations in which he is sorely needed. The abuser
makes sure that his knowledge, his skills, his
connections, or his traits are the only ones applicable
and the most useful in the situations that he, himself,
wrought. The abuser generates his own indispensability.
TIP
Stay away from such quagmires. Scrutinize every offer

and suggestion, no matter how innocuous.
Prepare backup plans. Keep others informed of your

whereabouts and appraised of your situation.
Be vigilant and doubting. Do not be gullible and

suggestible. Better safe than sorry.
III. Control and Abuse by Proxy
If all else fails, the abuser recruits friends, colleagues,

mates, family members, the authorities, institutions,
neighbours, the media, teachers – in short, third parties
– to do his bidding. He uses them to cajole, coerce,
threaten, stalk, offer, retreat, tempt, convince, harass,
communicate and otherwise manipulate his target. He
controls these unaware instruments exactly as he plans
to control his ultimate prey. He employs the same
mechanisms and devices. And he dumps his props
unceremoniously when the job is done.
Another form of control by proxy is to engineer
situations in which abuse is inflicted upon another
person. Such carefully crafted scenarios of
embarrassment and humiliation provoke social
sanctions (condemnation, opprobrium, or even physical
punishment) against the victim. Society, or a social
group become the instruments of the abuser.
TIP
Often the abuser's proxies are unaware of their role.

Expose him. Inform them. Demonstrate to them how
they are being abused, misused, and plain used by the
abuser.
Trap your abuser. Treat him as he treats you. Involve

others. Bring it into the open. Nothing like sunshine to
disinfest abuse.
IV. Ambient Abuse
The fostering, propagation and enhancement of an

atmosphere of fear, intimidation, instability,
unpredictability and irritation. There are no acts of
traceable explicit abuse, nor any manipulative settings
of control. Yet, the irksome feeling remains, a
disagreeable foreboding, a premonition, a bad omen.
This is sometimes called "gaslighting".
In the long term, such an environment erodes the

victim's sense of self-worth and self-esteem. Self-
confidence is shaken badly. Often, the victim adopts a
paranoid or schizoid stance and thus renders himself or
herself exposed even more to criticism and judgment.
The roles are thus reversed: the victim is
considered mentally deranged and the abuser – the
suffering soul.
TIP
Run! Get away! Ambient abuse often develops to overt

and violent abuse.
You don't owe anyone an explanation - but you owe

yourself a life. Bail out.
Articles Menu
http://www.narcissistica-abuse.com/abuse.html
http://www.narcissistica-abuse.com/abusefamily.html
1. The Gradations of Abuse
2. The Guilt of the Abused - Pathologizing the Victim
3. Coping with Your Abuser
4. The Abuser in Denial
5. Avoiding Your Abuser - The Submissive Posture
6. Avoiding Your Abuser - The Conflictive Posture
7. The Tocsins of Abuse - How to Spot an Abuser on

Your First Date
8. The Tocsins of Abuse - The Abuser's Body

Language
9. The Path to Abuse
10. Ambient Abuse and Gaslighting
11. Abuse by Proxy
12. Leveraging the Children
13. Tell Your Children the Truth
14. The Relief of Being Abandoned
15. How to Cope with Your Paranoid Ex
16. Avoiding Your Paranoid Ex
17. The Three Forms of Closure
18. Coping with Stalking and Stalkers
19. Getting Help
20. Domestic Violence Shelters
21. Planning and Executing Your Getaway
21a. Should You Get the Police Involved?
21b. Restraining Orders and Peace Bonds
22. The Dynamics of Spousal Abuse
23. The Mind of the Abuser
24. Condoning Abuse

25. The Anomaly of Abuse
26. Reconditioning the Abuser
27. Reforming the Abuser
28. Contracting with Your Abuser
29. Your Abuser in Therapy
30. Testing the Abuser
31. Conning the System
32. Befriending the System
33. Working with Professionals
34. Interacting with Your Abuser
35. Coping with Your Stalker
36. Statistics of Abuse and Stalking
37. The Stalker as Antisocial Bully
38. Coping with Various Types of Stalkers
39. The Erotomanic Stalker
40. The Narcissistic Stalker
41. The Psychopathic (Antisocial) Stalker
42. How Victims are Affected by Abuse

43. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
44. Recovery and Healing from Trauma and Abuse
45. The Conflicts of Therapy
Toxic Relationships
with Malignant Narcissists and Psychopaths
How to Recognize a Narcissist Before It is Too Late?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabus
e/message/4976
Narcissists and Personality disordered Mates, Spouses,

and Partners
e/message/5013
Narcissists, psychopaths, sex, and marital fidelity
e/message/4920
Narcissistic and Psychopathic Parents and Their

Children
e/message/4727
Projection and Projective Identification - Abuser in

Denial
e/message/5002
Approach-Avoidance Repetition Complex and Fear of

Intimacy
e/message/5000
The Narcissist or Psychopath Hates your

Independence and Personal Autonomy
e/message/4959
I miss him so much - I want him back!
e/message/4934
Guilt? What guilt?
e/message/4931
How Victims are Pathologized and re-abused by the

System
e/message/5068
Return
("He" in this text - to mean "He" or "She").
We react to serious mishaps, life altering setbacks,

disasters, abuse, and death by going through the phases
of grieving. Traumas are the complex outcomes of
psychodynamic and biochemical processes. But the
particulars of traumas depend heavily on the interaction
between the victim and his social milieu.
It would seem that while the victim progresses from

denial to helplessness, rage, depression and thence to
acceptance of the traumatizing events - society
demonstrates a diametrically opposed progression. This
incompatibility, this mismatch of psychological phases
is what leads to the formation and crystallization of
trauma.
PHASE I
Victim phase I - DENIAL
The magnitude of such unfortunate events is often so

overwhelming, their nature so alien, and their message
so menacing - that denial sets in as a defence
mechanism aimed at self preservation. The victim
denies that the event occurred, that he or she is being
abused, that a loved one passed away.
Society phase I - ACCEPTANCE, MOVING ON
The victim's nearest ("Society") - his colleagues, his

employees, his clients, even his spouse, children, and
friends - rarely experience the events with the same
shattering intensity. They are likely to accept the bad
news and move on. Even at their most considerate and
empathic, they are likely to lose patience with the
victim's state of mind. They tend to ignore the victim, or
chastise him, to mock, or to deride his feelings or
behaviour, to collude to repress the painful memories, or
to trivialize them.
Summary Phase I
The mismatch between the victim's reactive patterns and

emotional needs and society's matter-of-fact attitude
hinders growth and healing. The victim requires
society's help in avoiding a head-on confrontation with a
reality he cannot digest. Instead, society serves as a
constant and mentally destabilizing reminder of the root
of the victim's unbearable agony (the Job syndrome).
PHASE II
Victim phase II - HELPLESSNESS
Denial gradually gives way to a sense of all-pervasive

and humiliating helplessness, often accompanied by
debilitating fatigue and mental disintegration. These are
among the classic symptoms of PTSD (Post Traumatic
Stress Disorder). These are the bitter results of the
internalization and integration of the harsh realization
that there is nothing one can do to alter the outcomes of
a natural, or man-made, catastrophe. The horror in
confronting one's finiteness, meaninglessness,
negligibility, and powerlessness - is overpowering.
Society phase II - DEPRESSION
The more the members of society come to grips with the

magnitude of the loss, or evil, or threat represented by
the grief inducing events - the sadder they become.
Depression is often little more than suppressed or self-
directed anger. The anger, in this case, is belatedly
induced by an identified or diffuse source of threat, or of
evil, or loss. It is a higher level variant of the "fight or
flight" reaction, tampered by the rational understanding
that the "source" is often too abstract to tackle directly.
Summary Phase II
Thus, when the victim is most in need, terrified by his

helplessness and adrift - society is immersed in
depression and unable to provide a holding and
supporting environment. Growth and healing is again
retarded by social interaction. The victim's innate sense
of annulment is enhanced by the self-addressed anger
(=depression) of those around him.
PHASE III
Both the victim and society react with RAGE to their

predicaments. In an effort to narcissistically reassert
himself, the victim develops a grandiose sense of anger
directed at paranoidally selected, unreal, diffuse, and
abstract targets (=frustration sources). By expressing
aggression, the victim re-acquires mastery of the world
and of himself.
Members of society use rage to re-direct the root cause
of their depression (which is, as we said, self directed
anger) and to channel it safely. To ensure that this
expressed aggression alleviates their depression - real
targets must are selected and real punishments meted
out. In this respect, "social rage" differs from the
victim's. The former is intended to sublimate aggression
and channel it in a socially acceptable manner - the
latter to reassert narcissistic self-love as an antidote to
an all-devouring sense of helplessness.
In other words, society, by itself being in a state of rage,

positively enforces the narcissistic rage reactions of the
grieving victim. This, in the long run, is counter-
productive, inhibits personal growth, and prevents
healing. It also erodes the reality test of the victim and
encourages self-delusions, paranoidal ideation, and
ideas of reference.
PHASE IV
Victim Phase IV - DEPRESSION
As the consequences of narcissistic rage - both social

and personal - grow more unacceptable, depression sets
in. The victim internalizes his aggressive impulses. Self
directed rage is safer but is the cause of great sadness
and even suicidal ideation. The victim's depression is a
way of conforming to social norms. It is also
instrumental in ridding the victim of the unhealthy
residues of narcissistic regression. It is when the victim
acknowledges the malignancy of his rage (and its anti-
social nature) that he adopts a depressive stance.
Society Phase IV - HELPLESSNESS
People around the victim ("society") also emerge from

their phase of rage transformed. As they realize the
futility of their rage, they feel more and more helpless
and devoid of options. They grasp their limitations and
the irrelevance of their good intentions. They accept the
inevitability of loss and evil and Kafkaesquely agree to
live under an ominous cloud of arbitrary judgement,
meted out by impersonal powers.
Summary Phase IV
Again, the members of society are unable to help the

victim to emerge from a self-destructive phase. His
depression is enhanced by their apparent helplessness.
Their introversion and inefficacy induce in the victim a
feeling of nightmarish isolation and alienation. Healing
and growth are once again retarded or even inhibited.
PHASE V
Victim Phase V - ACCEPTANCE AND MOVING

ON
Depression - if pathologically protracted and in

conjunction with other mental health problems -
sometimes leads to suicide. But more often, it allows the
victim to process mentally hurtful and potentially
harmful material and paves the way to acceptance.
Depression is a laboratory of the psyche. Withdrawal
from social pressures enables the direct transformation
of anger into other emotions, some of them otherwise
socially unacceptable. The honest encounter between
the victim and his own (possible) death often becomes a
cathartic and self-empowering inner dynamic. The
victim emerges ready to move on.
Society Phase V - DENIAL
Society, on the other hand, having exhausted its reactive

arsenal - resorts to denial. As memories fade and as the
victim recovers and abandons his obsessive-compulsive
dwelling on his pain - society feels morally justified to
forget and forgive. This mood of historical revisionism,
of moral leniency, of effusive forgiveness, of re-
interpretation, and of a refusal to remember in detail -
leads to a repression and denial of the painful events by
society.
Summary Phase V
This final mismatch between the victim's emotional

needs and society's reactions is less damaging to the
victim. He is now more resilient, stronger, more
flexible, and more willing to forgive and forget.
Society's denial is really a denial of the victim. But,
having ridden himself of more primitive narcissistic
defences - the victim can do without society's
acceptance, approval, or look. Having endured the
purgatory of grieving, he has now re-acquired his self,
independent of society's acknowledgement.
Also read:
Psychology of Torture
Back to La-la Land

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
The Malignant Optimism of the Abused
Spousal (Domestic) Abuse and Violence
Verbal and Emotional Abuse - Articles Menu
Return
There is one place in which one's privacy, intimacy,

integrity and inviolability are guaranteed – one's body, a
unique temple and a familiar territory of sensa and
personal history. The torturer invades, defiles and
desecrates this shrine. He does so publicly, deliberately,
repeatedly and, often, sadistically and sexually, with
undisguised pleasure. Hence the all-pervasive, long-
lasting, and, frequently, irreversible effects and
outcomes of torture.
In a way, the torture victim's own body is rendered his

worse enemy. It is corporeal agony that compels the
sufferer to mutate, his identity to fragment, his ideals
and principles to crumble. The body becomes an
accomplice of the tormentor, an uninterruptible channel
of communication, a treasonous, poisoned territory.
It fosters a humiliating dependency of the abused on the

perpetrator. Bodily needs denied – sleep, toilet, food,
water – are wrongly perceived by the victim as the
direct causes of his degradation and dehumanization. As
he sees it, he is rendered bestial not by the sadistic
bullies around him but by his own flesh.
The concept of "body" can easily be extended to

"family", or "home". Torture is often applied to kin and
kith, compatriots, or colleagues. This intends to disrupt
the continuity of "surroundings, habits, appearance,
relations with others", as the CIA put it in one of its
manuals. A sense of cohesive self-identity depends
crucially on the familiar and the continuous. By
attacking both one's biological body and one's "social
body", the victim's psyche is strained to the point of
dissociation.
Beatrice Patsalides describes this transmogrification

thus in "Ethics of the Unspeakable: Torture Survivors in
Psychoanalytic Treatment":
"As the gap between the 'I' and the 'me' deepens,
dissociation and alienation increase. The subject that,
under torture, was forced into the position of pure object
has lost his or her sense of interiority, intimacy, and
privacy. Time is experienced now, in the present only,
and perspective – that which allows for a sense of
relativity – is foreclosed. Thoughts and dreams attack
the mind and invade the body as if the protective skin
that normally contains our thoughts, gives us space to
breathe in between the thought and the thing being
thought about, and separates between inside and
outside, past and present, me and you, was lost."
Torture robs the victim of the most basic modes of

relating to reality and, thus, is the equivalent of
cognitive death. Space and time are warped by sleep
deprivation. The self ("I") is shattered. The tortured
have nothing familiar to hold on to: family, home,
personal belongings, loved ones, language, name.
Gradually, they lose their mental resilience and sense of
freedom. They feel alien – unable to communicate,
relate, attach, or empathize with others.
Torture splinters early childhood grandiose narcissistic

fantasies of uniqueness, omnipotence, invulnerability,
and impenetrability. But it enhances the fantasy of
merger with an idealized and omnipotent (though not
benign) other – the inflicter of agony. The twin
processes of individuation and separation are reversed.
Torture is the ultimate act of perverted intimacy. The

torturer invades the victim's body, pervades his psyche,
and possesses his mind. Deprived of contact with others
and starved for human interactions, the prey bonds with
the predator. "Traumatic bonding", akin to the
Stockholm Syndrome, is about hope and the search for
meaning in the brutal and indifferent and nightmarish
universe of the torture cell.
The abuser becomes the black hole at the center of the

victim's surrealistic galaxy, sucking in the sufferer's
universal need for solace. The victim tries to "control"
his tormentor by becoming one with him (introjecting
him) and by appealing to the monster's presumably
dormant humanity and empathy.
This bonding is especially strong when the torturer and

the tortured form a dyad and "collaborate" in the rituals
and acts of torture (for instance, when the victim is
coerced into selecting the torture implements and the
types of torment to be inflicted, or to choose between
two evils).
The psychologist Shirley Spitz offers this powerful

overview of the contradictory nature of torture in a
seminar titled "The Psychology of Torture" (1989):
"Torture is an obscenity in that it joins what is most

private with what is most public. Torture entails all the
isolation and extreme solitude of privacy with none of
the usual security embodied therein... Torture entails at
the same time all the self-exposure of the utterly public
with none of its possibilities for camaraderie or shared
experience. (The presence of an all powerful other with
whom to merge, without the security of the other's
benign intentions.)
A further obscenity of torture is the inversion it makes

of intimate human relationships. The interrogation is a
form of social encounter in which the normal rules of
communicating, of relating, of intimacy are
manipulated. Dependency needs are elicited by the
interrogator, but not so they may be met as in close
relationships, but to weaken and confuse. Independence
that is offered in return for 'betrayal' is a lie. Silence is
intentionally misinterpreted either as confirmation of
information or as guilt for 'complicity'.
Torture combines complete humiliating exposure with

utter devastating isolation. The final products and
outcome of torture are a scarred and often shattered
victim and an empty display of the fiction of power."
Obsessed by endless ruminations, demented by pain and

a continuum of sleeplessness – the victim regresses,
shedding all but the most primitive defense
mechanisms: splitting, narcissism, dissociation,
Projective Identification, introjection, and cognitive
dissonance. The victim constructs an alternative world,
often suffering from depersonalization and
derealization, hallucinations, ideas of reference,
delusions, and psychotic episodes.
Sometimes the victim comes to crave pain – very much

as self-mutilators do – because it is a proof and a
reminder of his individuated existence otherwise blurred
by the incessant torture. Pain shields the sufferer from
disintegration and capitulation. It preserves the veracity
of his unthinkable and unspeakable experiences.
This dual process of the victim's alienation and

addiction to anguish complements the perpetrator's view
of his quarry as "inhuman", or "subhuman". The torturer
assumes the position of the sole authority, the exclusive
fount of meaning and interpretation, the source of both
evil and good.
Torture is about reprogramming the victim to succumb

to an alternative exegesis of the world, proffered by the
abuser. It is an act of deep, indelible, traumatic
indoctrination. The abused also swallows whole and
assimilates the torturer's negative view of him and often,
as a result, is rendered suicidal, self-destructive, or self-
defeating.
Thus, torture has no cut-off date. The sounds, the

voices, the smells, the sensations reverberate long after
the episode has ended – both in nightmares and in
waking moments. The victim's ability to trust other
people – i.e., to assume that their motives are at least
rational, if not necessarily benign – has been irrevocably
undermined. Social institutions are perceived as
precariously poised on the verge of an ominous,
Kafkaesque mutation. Nothing is either safe, or credible
anymore.
Victims typically react by undulating between emotional

numbing and increased arousal: insomnia, irritability,
restlessness, and attention deficits. Recollections of the
traumatic events intrude in the form of dreams, night
terrors, flashbacks, and distressing associations.
The tortured develop compulsive rituals to fend off
obsessive thoughts. Other psychological sequelae
reported include cognitive impairment, reduced capacity
to learn, memory disorders, sexual dysfunction, social
withdrawal, inability to maintain long-term
relationships, or even mere intimacy, phobias, ideas of
reference and superstitions, delusions, hallucinations,
psychotic microepisodes, and emotional flatness.
Depression and anxiety are very common. These are

forms and manifestations of self-directed aggression.
The sufferer rages at his own victimhood and resulting
multiple dysfunction. He feels shamed by his new
disabilities and responsible, or even guilty, somehow,
for his predicament and the dire consequences borne by
his nearest and dearest. His sense of self-worth and self-
esteem are crippled.
In a nutshell, torture victims suffer from a Post-

Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Their strong feelings
of anxiety, guilt, and shame are also typical of victims
of childhood abuse, domestic violence, and rape. They
feel anxious because the perpetrator's behavior is
seemingly arbitrary and unpredictable – or mechanically
and inhumanly regular.
They feel guilty and disgraced because, to restore a

semblance of order to their shattered world and a
modicum of dominion over their chaotic life, they need
to transform themselves into the cause of their own
degradation and the accomplices of their tormentors.
The CIA, in its "Human Resource Exploitation Training

Manual – 1983" (reprinted in the April 1997 issue of
Harper's Magazine), summed up the theory of coercion
thus:
"The purpose of all coercive techniques is to induce

psychological regression in the subject by bringing a
superior outside force to bear on his will to resist.
Regression is basically a loss of autonomy, a reversion
to an earlier behavioral level. As the subject regresses,
his learned personality traits fall away in reverse
chronological order. He begins to lose the capacity to
carry out the highest creative activities, to deal with
complex situations, or to cope with stressful
interpersonal relationships or repeated frustrations."
Inevitably, in the aftermath of torture, its victims feel

helpless and powerless. This loss of control over one's
life and body is manifested physically in impotence,
attention deficits, and insomnia. This is often
exacerbated by the disbelief many torture victims
encounter, especially if they are unable to produce scars,
or other "objective" proof of their ordeal. Language
cannot communicate such an intensely private
experience as pain.
Spitz makes the following observation:
"Pain is also unsharable in that it is resistant to

language... All our interior states of consciousness:
emotional, perceptual, cognitive and somatic can be
described as having an object in the external world...
This affirms our capacity to move beyond the
boundaries of our body into the external, sharable
world. This is the space in which we interact and
communicate with our environment. But when we
explore the interior state of physical pain we find that
there is no object 'out there' – no external, referential
content. Pain is not of, or for, anything. Pain is. And it
draws us away from the space of interaction, the
sharable world, inwards. It draws us into the boundaries
of our body."
Bystanders resent the tortured because they make them

feel guilty and ashamed for having done nothing to
prevent the atrocity. The victims threaten their sense of
security and their much-needed belief in predictability,
justice, and rule of law. The victims, on their part, do
not believe that it is possible to effectively communicate
to "outsiders" what they have been through. The torture
chambers are "another galaxy". This is how Auschwitz
was described by the author K. Zetnik in his testimony
in the Eichmann trial in Jerusalem in 1961.
Kenneth Pope in "Torture", a chapter he wrote for the

"Encyclopedia of Women and Gender: Sex Similarities
and Differences and the Impact of Society on Gender",
quotes Harvard psychiatrist Judith Herman:
"It is very tempting to take the side of the perpetrator.

All the perpetrator asks is that the bystander do nothing.
He appeals to the universal desire to see, hear, and speak
no evil. The victim, on the contrary, asks the bystander
to share the burden of pain. The victim demands action,
engagement, and remembering."
But, more often, continued attempts to repress fearful

memories result in psychosomatic illnesses
(conversion). The victim wishes to forget the torture, to
avoid re-experiencing the often life threatening abuse
and to shield his human environment from the horrors.
In conjunction with the victim's pervasive distrust, this
is frequently interpreted as hypervigilance, or even
paranoia. It seems that the victims can't win. Torture is
forever.
Note – Why Do People Torture?
We should distinguish functional torture from the

sadistic variety. The former is calculated to extract
information from the tortured or to punish them. It is
measured, impersonal, efficient, and disinterested.
The latter – the sadistic variety – fulfils the emotional

needs of the perpetrator.
People who find themselves caught up in anomic states

– for instance, soldiers in war or incarcerated inmates –
tend to feel helpless and alienated. They experience a
partial or total loss of control. They have been rendered
vulnerable, powerless, and defenseless by events and
circumstances beyond their influence.
Torture amounts to exerting an absolute and all-

pervasive domination of the victim's existence. It is a
coping strategy employed by torturers who wish to
reassert control over their lives and, thus, to re-establish
their mastery and superiority. By subjugating the
tortured – they regain their self-confidence and regulate
their sense of self-worth.
Other tormentors channel their negative emotions – pent

up aggression, humiliation, rage, envy, diffuse hatred –
and displace them. The victim becomes a symbol of
everything that's wrong in the torturer's life and the
situation he finds himself caught in. The act of torture
amounts to misplaced and violent venting.
Many perpetrate heinous acts out of a wish to conform.
Torturing others is their way of demonstrating
obsequious obeisance to authority, group affiliation,
colleagueship, and adherence to the same ethical code of
conduct and common values. They bask in the praise
that is heaped on them by their superiors, fellow
workers, associates, team mates, or collaborators. Their
need to belong is so strong that it overpowers ethical,
moral, or legal considerations.
Many offenders derive pleasure and satisfaction from

sadistic acts of humiliation. To these, inflicting pain is
fun. They lack empathy and so their victim's agonized
reactions are merely cause for much hilarity.
Moreover, sadism is rooted in deviant sexuality. The

torture inflicted by sadists is bound to involve perverted
sex (rape, homosexual rape, voyeurism, exhibitionism,
pedophilia, fetishism, and other paraphilias). Aberrant
sex, unlimited power, excruciating pain – these are the
intoxicating ingredients of the sadistic variant of torture.
Still, torture rarely occurs where it does not have the

sanction and blessing of the authorities, whether local or
national. A permissive environment is sine qua non. The
more abnormal the circumstances, the less normative
the milieu, the further the scene of the crime is from
public scrutiny – the more is egregious torture likely to
occur. This is especially true in totalitarian societies
where the use of physical force to discipline or
eliminate dissent is an acceptable practice.
Also Read:
The Business of Torture
The Argument for Torture
Return
Trauma
Torture
Abuse
Effects and Consequences

Repeated abuse has long lasting pernicious and

traumatic effects such as panic attacks, hypervigilance,
sleep disturbances, flashbacks (intrusive memories),
suicidal ideation, and psychosomatic symptoms. The
victims experience shame, depression, anxiety,
embarrassment, guilt, humiliation, abandonment, and an
enhanced sense of vulnerability.
C-PTSD (Complex PTSD) has been proposed as a new

mental health diagnosis by Dr. Judith Herman of
Harvard University to account for the impact of
extended periods of trauma and abuse.
In "Stalking – An Overview of the Problem" [Can J

Psychiatry 1998;43:473–476], authors Karen M Abrams
and Gail Erlick Robinson write:
"Initially, there is often much denial by the victim.

Over time, however, the stress begins to erode the
victim's life and psychological brutalisation results.
Sometimes the victim develops an almost fatal resolve
that, inevitably, one day she will be murdered. Victims,
unable to live a normal life, describe feeling stripped
of self-worth and dignity. Personal control and
resources, psychosocial development, social support,
premorbid personality traits, and the severity of the
stress may all influence how the victim experiences
and responds to it… Victims stalked by ex-lovers may
experience additional guilt and lowered self-esteem for
perceived poor judgement in their relationship
choices. Many victims become isolated and deprived of
support when employers or friends withdraw after also
being subjected to harassment or are cut off by the
victim in order to protect them. Other tangible
consequences include financial losses from quitting
jobs, moving, and buying expensive security
equipment in an attempt to gain privacy. Changing
homes and jobs results in both material losses and loss
of self-respect."
Surprisingly, verbal, psychological, and emotional abuse

have the same effects as the physical variety
[Psychology Today, September/October 2000 issue,
p.24]. Abuse of all kinds also interferes with the victim's
ability to work. Abrams and Robinson wrote this [in
"Occupational Effects of Stalking", Can J Psychiatry
2002;47:468–472]:
"… (B)eing stalked by a former partner may affect a

victim's ability to work in 3 ways. First, the stalking
behaviours often interfere directly with the ability to
get to work (for example, flattening tires or other
methods of preventing leaving the home). Second, the
workplace may become an unsafe location if the
offender decides to appear. Third, the mental health
effects of such trauma may result in forgetfulness,
fatigue, lowered concentration, and disorganisation.
These factors may lead to the loss of employment, with
accompanying loss of income, security, and status."
Still, it is hard to generalise. Victims are not a uniform

lot. In some cultures, abuse is commonplace and
accepted as a legitimate mode of communication, a sign
of love and caring, and a boost to the abuser's self-
image. In such circumstances, the victim is likely to
adopt the norms of society and avoid serious trauma.
Deliberate, cold-blooded, and premeditated torture has
worse and longer-lasting effects than abuse meted out
by the abuser in rage and loss of self-control. The
existence of a loving and accepting social support
network is another mitigating factor. Finally, the ability
to express negative emotions safely and to cope with
them constructively is crucial to healing.
Typically, by the time the abuse reaches critical and all-

pervasive proportions, the abuser had already, spider-
like, isolated his victim from family, friends, and
colleagues. She is catapulted into a nether land, cult-like
setting where reality itself dissolves into a continuing
nightmare.
When she emerges on the other end of this wormhole,

the abused woman (or, more rarely, man) feels helpless,
self-doubting, worthless, stupid, and a guilty failure for
having botched her relationship and "abandoned" her
"family". In an effort to regain perspective and avoid
embarrassment, the victim denies the abuse or
minimises it.
No wonder that survivors of abuse tend to be clinically

depressed, neglect their health and personal appearance,
and succumb to boredom, rage, and impatience. Many
end up abusing prescription drugs or drinking or
otherwise behaving recklessly.
Some victims even develop Post-Traumatic Stress

Disorder (PTSD).
(I use "she" throughout this article but it applies to

male victims as well)
Contrary to popular misconceptions, Post-Traumatic
Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Acute Stress Disorder (or
Reaction) are not typical responses to prolonged abuse.
They are the outcomes of sudden exposure to severe or
extreme stressors (stressful events). Yet, some victims
whose life or body have been directly and unequivocally
threatened by an abuser react by developing these
syndromes. PTSD is, therefore, typically associated
with the aftermath of physical and sexual abuse in both
children and adults.
This is why another mental health diagnosis, C-PTSD

(Complex PTSD) has been proposed by Dr. Judith
Herman of Harvard
University to account for the impact of extended periods
of trauma and abuse. It is described here:
One's (or someone else's) looming death, violation,

personal injury, or powerful pain are sufficient to
provoke the behaviours, cognitions, and emotions that
together are known as PTSD. Even learning about such
mishaps may be enough to trigger massive anxiety
responses.
The first phase of PTSD involves incapacitating and

overwhelming fear. The victim feels like she has been
thrust into a nightmare or a horror movie. She is
rendered helpless by her own terror. She keeps re-living
the experience through recurrent and intrusive visual
and auditory hallucinations ("flashbacks") or dreams. In
some flashbacks, the victim completely lapses into a
dissociative state and physically re-enacts the event
while being thoroughly oblivious to her whereabouts.
In an attempt to suppress this constant playback and the
attendant exaggerated startle response (jumpiness), the
victim tries to avoid all stimuli associated, however
indirectly, with the traumatic event. Many develop full-
scale phobias (agoraphobia, claustrophobia, fear of
heights, aversion to specific animals, objects, modes of
transportation, neighbourhoods, buildings, occupations,
weather, and so on).
Most PTSD victims are especially vulnerable on the

anniversaries of their abuse. They try to avoid thoughts,
feelings, conversations, activities, situations, or people
who remind them of the traumatic occurrence
("triggers").
This constant hypervigilance and arousal, sleep

disorders (mainly insomnia), the irritability ("short
fuse"), and the inability to concentrate and complete
even relatively simple tasks erode the victim's
resilience. Utterly fatigued, most patients manifest
protracted periods of numbness, automatism, and, in
radical cases, near-catatonic posture. Response times to
verbal cues increase dramatically. Awareness of the
environment decreases, sometimes dangerously so. The
victims are described by their nearest and dearest as
"zombies", "machines", or "automata".
The victims appear to be sleepwalking, depressed,

dysphoric, anhedonic (not interested in anything and
find pleasure in nothing). They report feeling detached,
emotionally absent, estranged, and alienated. Many
victims say that their "life is over" and expect to have no
career, family, or otherwise meaningful future.
The victim's family and friends complain that she is no
longer capable of showing intimacy, tenderness,
compassion, empathy, and of having sex (due to her
post-traumatic "frigidity"). Many victims become
paranoid, impulsive, reckless, and self-destructive.
Others somatise their mental problems and complain of
numerous physical ailments. They all feel guilty,
shameful, humiliated, desperate, hopeless, and hostile.
PTSD need not appear immediately after the harrowing

experience. It can – and often is – delayed by days or
even months. It lasts more than one month (usually
much longer). Sufferers of PTSD report subjective
distress (the manifestations of PTSD are ego-dystonic).
Their functioning in various settings – job performance,
grades at school, sociability – deteriorates markedly.
The DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual)

criteria for diagnosing PTSD are far too restrictive.
PTSD seems to also develop in the wake of verbal and
emotional abuse and in the aftermath of drawn out
traumatic situations (such a nasty divorce). Hopefully,
the text will be adapted to reflect this sad reality.
Victims of abuse in all its forms – verbal, emotional,

financial, physical, and sexual – are often disorientated.
They require not only therapy to heal their emotional
wounds, but also practical guidance and topical
education. At first, the victim is, naturally, distrustful
and even hostile. The therapist or case worker must
establish confidence and rapport painstakingly and
patiently.
The therapeutic alliance requires constant reassurance

that the environment and treatment modalities chosen
are safe and supportive. This is not easy to do, partly
because of objective factors such as the fact that the
records and notes of the therapist are not confidential.
The offender can force their disclosure in a court of law
simply by filing a civil lawsuit against the survivor!
The first task is to legitimise and validate the victim's

fears. This is done by making clear to her that she is not
responsible for her abuse or guilty for what happened.
Victimisation is the abuser's fault – it is not the victim's
choice. Victims do not seek abuse – although,
admittedly some of them keep finding abusive partners
and forming relationships of co-dependence. Facing,
reconstructing, and reframing the traumatic experiences
is a crucial and indispensable first phase.
The therapist should present the victim with her own

ambivalence and the ambiguity of her messages – but
this ought to be done gently, non-judgementally, and
without condemnation. The more willing and able the
abuse survivor is to confront the reality of her
mistreatment (and the offender), the stronger she would
feel and the less guilty.
Typically, the patient's helplessness decreases together

with her self-denial. Her self-esteem as well as her sense
of self-worth stabilise. The therapist should emphasise
the survivor's strengths and demonstrate how they can
save her from a recurrence of the abuse or help her cope
with it and with her abuser.
Education is an a important tool in this process of

recovery. The patient should be made aware of the
prevalence and nature of violence against women and
stalking, their emotional and physical effects, warning
signs and red flags, legal redresses, coping strategies,
and safety precautions.
The therapist or social worker should provide the victim

with lists of contacts – help organisations, law
enforcement agencies, other women in her condition,
domestic violence shelters, and victims' support groups
both online and in her neighbourhood or city.
Knowledge empowers and reduces the victim's sense of
isolation and worthlessness.
Helping the survivor regain control of her life is the

over-riding goal of the entire therapeutic process. With
this aim in mind, she should be encouraged to re-
establish contact with family, friends, colleagues, and
the community at large. The importance of a tightly-knit
social support network cannot be exaggerated.
Ideally, after a period of combined tutoring, talk therapy,

and (anti-anxiety or antidepressant) medications, the
survivor will self-mobilise and emerge from the
experience more resilient and assertive and less gullible
and self-deprecating.
Return
Victim reaction to Abuse
By Narcissists and Psychopaths
Personality disorders are not only all-pervasive, but also

diffuse and shape-shifting. It is taxing and emotionally
harrowing to watch how a loved one is consumed by
these pernicious and largely incurable conditions.
Victims adopt varying stances and react in different
ways to the inevitable abuse involved in relationships
with personality disordered patients.
1. Malignant Optimism
A form of self-delusion, refusing to believe that

some diseases are untreatable. Malignant
optimists see signs of hope in every fluctuation, read
meanings and patterns into every random occurrence,
utterance, or slip. These Pollyanna defences are varieties
of magical thinking.
"If only he tried hard enough", "If he only really wanted

to heal", "If only we find the right therapy", "If only his
defences were down", "There must be something good
and worthwhile under the hideous facade", "No one can
be that evil and destructive", "He must have meant it
differently" "God, or a higher being, or the spirit, or the
soul is the solution and the answer to my prayers".
From my book, "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism

Revisited":
"The narcissist and psychopath hold such thinking in

barely undisguised contempt. To them, it is a sign of
weakness, the scent of prey, a gaping
vulnerability. They use and abuse this human need for
order, good, and meaning - as they use and abuse all
other human needs. Gullibility, selective blindness,
malignant optimism - these are the weapons of the
beast. And the abused are hard at work to provide it
with its arsenal."
Read "Is Your Cup Half-full or is it Half Empty?"
2. Rescue Fantasies
"It is true that he is chauvinistic and that his behaviour

is unacceptable and repulsive. But all he needs is a little
love and he will be straightened out. I will rescue him
from his misery and misfortune. I will give him the love
that he lacked as a child. Then his (narcissism,
psychopathy, paranoia, reclusiveness) will vanish and
we will live happily ever after."
3. Self-flagellation
Constant feelings of guilt, self-reproach, self-

recrimination and, thus, self-punishment.
The victim of sadists, paranoids, narcissists, borderlines,

passive-aggressives, and psychopaths internalises the
endless hectoring and humiliating criticism and makes
them her own. She begins to self-punish, to withhold, to
request approval prior to any action, to forgo her
preferences and priorities, to erase her own identity –
hoping to thus avoid the excruciating pains of her
partner's destructive analyses.
The partner is often a willing participant in this shared

psychosis. Such folie a deux can never take place
without the full collaboration of a voluntarily
subordinated victim. Such partners have a wish to be
punished, to be eroded through constant, biting
criticisms, unfavourable comparisons, veiled and not so
veiled threats, acting out, betrayals and humiliations. It
makes them feel cleansed, "holy", whole, and sacrificial.
Many of these partners, when they realise their situation

(it is very difficult to discern it from the inside),
abandon the personality disordered partner and
dismantle the relationship. Others prefer to believe in
the healing power of love. But here love is wasted on a
human shell, incapable of feeling anything but negative
emotions.
4. Emulation
The psychiatric profession uses the word:

"epidemiology" when it describes the prevalence of
personality disorders. Are personality disorders
communicable diseases? In a way, they are.
From my book, "Malignant Self Love - Narcissism

Revisited":
"Some people adopt the role of a professional victim.

Their existence and very identity rests solely and
entirely on their victimhood. They become self-
centred, devoid of empathy, abusive, and exploitative.
These victim "pros" are often more cruel, vengeful,
vitriolic, lacking in compassion and violent than their
abusers. They make a career of it.
The affected entertain the (false) notion that they can

compartmentalize their abusive (e.g., narcissistic, or
psychopathic) behavior and direct it only at their
victimizers. In other words, they trust in their ability to
segregate their conduct and to be verbally abusive
towards the abuser while civil and compassionate with
others, to act with malice where their mentally-ill
partner is concerned and with Christian charity
towards all others. They believe that they can turn on
and off their negative feelings, their abusive outbursts,
their vindictiveness and vengefulness, their blind rage,
their non-discriminating judgment.
This, of course, is untrue. These behaviors spill over

into daily transactions with innocent neighbors,
colleagues, family members, co-workers, or customers.
One cannot be partly or temporarily vindictive and
judgmental any more than one can be partly or
temporarily pregnant. To their horror, these victims
discover that they have been transmuted and
transformed into their worst nightmare: into their
abusers - malevolent, vicious, lacking empathy,
egotistical, exploitative, violent and abusive."
Return
For her traumatic wounds to heal, the victim of abuse

requires closure - one final interaction with her
tormentor in which he, hopefully, acknowledges his
misbehaviour and even tenders an apology. Fat chance.
Few abusers - especially if they are narcissistic - are
amenable to such weakling pleasantries. More often, the
abused are left to wallow in a poisonous stew of misery,
self-pity, and self-recrimination.
Depending on the severity, duration, and nature of the

abuse, there are three forms of effective closure.
Conceptual Closure
This most common variant involves a frank dissection

of the abusive relationship. The parties meet to analyze
what went wrong, to allocate blame and guilt, to derive
lessons, and to part ways cathartically cleansed. In such
an exchange, a compassionate offender (quite the
oxymoron, admittedly) offers his prey the chance to rid
herself of cumulating resentment.
He also disabuses her of the notion that she, in any way,

was guilty or responsible for her maltreatment, that it
was all her fault, that she deserved to be punished, and
that she could have saved the relationship (malignant
optimism). With this burden gone, the victim is ready to
resume her life and to seek companionship and love
elsewhere.
Retributive Closure
When the abuse has been "gratuitous" (sadistic),

repeated, and protracted, conceptual closure is not
enough. Retribution is called for, an element of
vengeance, of restorative justice and a restored balance.
Recuperation hinges on punishing the delinquent and
merciless party. The penal intervention of the Law is
often therapeutic to the abused.
Some victims delude themselves into believing that

their abuser is experiencing guilt and conscience pangs
(which is rarely the case). They revel in his ostensible
self-inflicted torment. His sleepless nights become their
sweet revenge.
Regrettably, the victim's understandable emotions often

lead to abusive (and illegal) acts. Many of the tormented
stalk their erstwhile abusers and take the law into their
own hands. Abuse tends to breed abuse all around, in
both prey and predator.
Dissociative Closure
Absent the other two forms of closure, victims of

egregious and prolonged mistreatment tend to repress
their painful memories. In extremis, they dissociate. The
Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) - formerly known
as "Multiple Personality Disorder" - is thought to be
such a reaction. The harrowing experiences are "sliced
off", tucked away, and attributed to "another
personality".
Sometimes, the victim "assimilates" his or her
tormentor, and even openly and consciously identifies
with him. This is the narcissistic defence. In his own
anguished mind, the victim becomes omnipotent and,
therefore, invulnerable. He or she develops a False Self.
The True Self is, thus, shielded from further harm and
injury.
According to psychodynamic theories of

psychopathology, repressed content rendered
unconscious is the cause of all manner of mental health
disorders. The victim thus pays a hefty price for
avoiding and evading his or her predicament.
Also Read
Narcissism By Proxy
The Vindictive Narcissist
The Narcissist as a Sadist
The Victims of the Narcissist
Narcissism and Other People's Guilt
Narcissists, Narcissistic Supply and Sources of Supply
Other People's Pain (Narcissism, Sadism, and

Masochism)
The Malignant Optimism of the Abused (Victims of
Narcissists)
How to Spot an Abuser on Your First Date
The Toxic Relationships Study List
"Trauma Bonding" and the Psychology of Torture
Coping with Your Abuser
Spousal (Domestic) Abuse and Violence
Verbal and Emotional Abuse - Articles Menu
HealthyPlace Narcissistic Personality Disorder

(NPD) Community
Case Studies on the Psychopath and Narcissist

Survivors Support Group
Ask Sam on the Psychopath and Narcissist Survivors

Support Group
Ask Sam on the Narcissistic Abuse Recovery Forum
Domestic Violence and Abuse statistics - Click here
RESOURCES
Verbal and Emotional Abuse on Suite101
Spousal (Domestic) Abuse and Violence on Suite101

Question:
Is there a point in waiting for the narcissist to heal? Can

he ever get better?
Answer:
The victims of the narcissist's abusive conduct resort to

fantasies and self-delusions to salve their pain.
Rescue Fantasies
"It is true that he is a chauvinistic narcissist and that his

behaviour is unacceptable and repulsive. But all he
needs is a little love and he will be straightened out. I
will rescue him from his misery and misfortune. I will
give him the love that he lacked as a child. Then his
narcissism will vanish and we will live happily ever
after."
Loving a Narcissist
I believe in the possibility of loving narcissists if one

accepts them unconditionally, in a disillusioned and
expectation-free manner.
Narcissists are narcissists. Take them or leave them.

Some of them are lovable. Most of them are highly
charming and intelligent. The source of the misery of
the victims of the narcissist is their disappointment,
their disillusionment, their abrupt and tearing and tearful
realisation that they fell in love with an ideal of their
own making, a phantasm, an illusion, a fata morgana.
This "waking up" is traumatic. The narcissist always
remains the same. It is the victim who changes.
It is true that narcissists present a luring facade in order

to captivate Sources of Narcissistic Supply. But this
facade is easy to penetrate because it is inconsistent and
too perfect. The cracks are evident from day one but
often ignored. Then there are those who KNOWINGLY
and WILLINGLY commit their emotional wings to the
burning narcissistic candle.
This is the catch-22. To try to communicate emotions to

a narcissist is like discussing atheism with a religious
fundamentalist.
Narcissists have emotions, very strong ones, so

terrifyingly overpowering and negative that they hide
them, repress, block and transmute them. They employ a
myriad of defence mechanisms to cope with their
repressed emotions: projective identification, splitting,
projection, intellectualisation, rationalisation.
Any effort to relate to the narcissist emotionally is

doomed to failure, alienation and rage. Any attempt to
"understand" (in retrospect or prospectively) narcissistic
behaviour patterns, reactions, or his inner world in
emotional terms – is equally hopeless. Narcissists
should be regarded as a force of nature or an accident
waiting to happen.
The Universe has no master-plot or mega-plan to

deprive anyone of happiness. Being born to narcissistic
parents, for instance, is not the result of a conspiracy. It
is a tragic event, for sure. But it cannot be dealt with
emotionally, without professional help, or haphazardly.
Stay away from narcissists, or face them aided by your
own self-discovery through therapy. It can be done.
Narcissists have no interest in emotional or even

intellectual stimulation by significant others. Such
feedback is perceived as a threat. Significant others in
the narcissist's life have very clear roles: the
accumulation and dispensation of past Primary
Narcissistic Supply in order to regulate current
Narcissistic Supply. Nothing less but definitely nothing
more. Proximity and intimacy breed contempt. A
process of devaluation is in full operation throughout
the life of the relationship.
A passive witness to the narcissist's past

accomplishments, a dispenser of accumulated
Narcissistic Supply, a punching bag for his rages, a co-
dependent, a possession (though not prized but taken for
granted) and nothing much more. This is the ungrateful,
FULL TIME, draining job of being the narcissist's
significant other.
But humans are not instruments. To regard them as such

is to devalue them, to reduce them, to restrict them, to
prevent them from realising their potential. Inevitably,
narcissists lose interest in their instruments, these
truncated versions of full-fledged humans, once they
cease to serve them in their pursuit of glory and fame.
Consider "friendship" with a narcissist as an example of

such thwarted relationships. One cannot really get to
know a narcissist "friend". One cannot be friends with a
narcissist and one cannot love a narcissist. Narcissists
are addicts. They are no different to drug addicts. They
are in pursuit of gratification through the drug known as
Narcissistic Supply. Everything and EVERYONE
around them is an object, a potential source (to be
idealised) or not (and, then to be cruelly discarded).
Narcissists home in on potential suppliers like cruise

missiles. They are excellent at imitating emotions, at
exhibiting the right behaviours on cue, and at
manipulating.
All generalisations are false, of course, and there are

bound to be some happy relationships with narcissists. I
discuss the narcissistic couple in one of my FAQs. One
example of a happy marriage is when a somatic
narcissist teams up with a cerebral one or vice versa.
Narcissists can be happily married to submissive,

subservient, self-deprecating, echoing, mirroring and
indiscriminately supportive spouses. They also do well
with masochists. But it is difficult to imagine that a
healthy, normal person would be happy in such a folie a
deux ("madness in twosome" or shared psychosis).
It is also difficult to imagine a benign and sustained

influence on the narcissist of a stable, healthy
mate/spouse/partner. One of my FAQs is dedicated to
this issue ("The Narcissist's Spouse / Mate / Partner").
BUT many a spouse/friend/mate/partner like to

BELIEVE that – given sufficient time and patience –
they will be the ones to rid the narcissist of his inner
demons. They think that they can "rescue" the narcissist,
shield him from his (distorted) self, as it were.
The narcissist makes use of this naiveté and exploits it
to his benefit. The natural protective mechanisms, which
are provoked in normal people by love – are cold
bloodedly used by the narcissist to extract yet more
Narcissistic Supply from his writhing victim.
The narcissist affects his victims by infiltrating their

psyches, by penetrating their defences. Like a virus, it
establishes a new genetic strain within his/her victims. It
echoes through them, it talks through them, it walks
through them. It is like the invasion of the body
snatchers.
You should be careful to separate your self from the

narcissist's seed inside you, this alien growth, this
spiritual cancer that is the result of living with a
narcissist. You should be able to tell apart the real you
and the parts assigned to you by the narcissist. To cope
with him/her, the narcissist forces you to "walk on
eggshells" and develop a False Self of your own. It is
nothing as elaborate as his False Self – but it is there, in
you, as a result of the trauma and abuse inflicted upon
you by the narcissist.
Thus, perhaps we should talk about VoNPD, another

mental health diagnostic category – Victims of NPD.
They experience shame and anger for their past

helplessness and submissiveness. They are hurt and
sensitised by the harrowing experience of sharing a
simulated existence with a simulated person, the
narcissist. They are scarred and often suffer from Post
Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Some of them lash
out at others, offsetting their frustration with bitter
aggression.
Like his disorder, the narcissist is all-pervasive. Being
the victim of a narcissist is a condition no less
pernicious than being a narcissist. Great mental efforts
are required to abandon a narcissist and physical
separation is only the first (and least important) step.
One can abandon a narcissist – but the narcissist is slow

to abandon his victims. He is there, lurking, rendering
existence unreal, twisting and distorting with no respite,
an inner, remorseless voice, lacking in compassion and
empathy for its victim.
The narcissist is there in spirit long after it had vanished

in the flesh. This is the real danger that the victims of
the narcissist face: that they become like him, bitter,
self-centred, lacking in empathy. This is the last bow of
the narcissist, his curtain call, by proxy as it were.
Narcissistic Tactics
The narcissist tends to surround himself with his

inferiors (in some respect: intellectually, financially,
physically). He limits his interactions with them to the
plane of his superiority. This is the safest and fastest
way to sustain his grandiose fantasies of omnipotence
and omniscience, brilliance, ideal traits, perfection and
so on.
Humans are interchangeable and the narcissist does not

distinguish one individual from another. To him they are
all inanimate elements of "his audience" whose job is to
reflect his False Self. This generates a perpetual and
permanent cognitive dissonance:
The narcissist despises the very people who sustain his
Ego boundaries and functions. He cannot respect people
so expressly and clearly inferior to him – yet he can
never associate with people evidently on his level or
superior to him, the risk of narcissistic injury in such
associations being too great. Equipped with a fragile
Ego, precariously teetering on the brink of narcissistic
injury – the narcissist prefers the safe route. But he feels
contempt for himself and for others for having preferred
it.
Some narcissist are also psychopaths (suffer from the

Antisocial PD) and/or sadists. Antisocials don't really
enjoy hurting others – they simply don't care one way or
the other. But sadists do enjoy it.
Classical narcissists do not enjoy wounding others – but

they do enjoy the sensation of unlimited power and the
validation of their grandiose fantasies when they do
harm others or are in the position to do so. It is more the
POTENTIAL to hurt others than the actual act that
turns them on.
The Neverending Story
Even the official termination of a relationship with a

narcissist is not the end of the affair. The Ex "belongs"
to the narcissist. She is an inseparable part of his
Pathological Narcissistic Space. This possessive streak
survives the physical separation.
Thus, the narcissist is likely to respond with rage,

seething envy, a sense of humiliation and invasion and
violent-aggressive urges to an ex's new boyfriend, or
new job (to her new life without him). Especially since
it implies a "failure" on his part and, thus negates his
grandiosity.
But there is a second scenario:
If the narcissist firmly believes (which is very rare) that

the ex does not and will never represent any amount,
however marginal and residual, of any kind (primary or
secondary) of Narcissistic Supply – he remains utterly
unmoved by anything she does and anyone she may
choose to be with.
Narcissists do feel bad about hurting others and about

the unsavoury course their lives tend to assume. Their
underlying (and subconscious) ego-dystony (=feeling
bad about themselves) was only recently discovered and
described. But the narcissist feels bad only when his
Supply Sources are threatened because of his behaviour
or following a narcissistic injury in the course of a
major life crisis.
The narcissist equates emotions with weakness. He

regards the sentimental and the emotional with
contempt. He looks down on the sensitive and the
vulnerable. He derides and despises the dependent and
the loving. He mocks expressions of compassion and
passion. He is devoid of empathy. He is so afraid of his
True Self that he would rather disparage it than admit to
his own faults and "soft spots".
He likes to talk about himself in mechanical terms

("machine", "efficient", "punctual", "output",
"computer"). He suppresses his human side diligently
and with dedication. To him being human and survival
are mutually exclusive propositions. He must choose
and his choice is clear. The narcissist never looks back,
unless and until forced to by life's circumstances.
All narcissists fear intimacy. But the cerebral narcissist

deploys strong defences against it: "scientific
detachment" (the narcissist as the eternal observer),
intellectualising and rationalising his emotions away,
intellectual cruelty (see my FAQ regarding
inappropriate affect), intellectual "annexation" (he
regards others as his extension, property, or turf),
objectifying the other and so on. Even emotions that he
does express (pathological envy, rage) have the not
wholly unintended effect of alienating rather than
creating intimacy.
Abandoning the Narcissist
The narcissist initiates his own abandonment because of

his fear of it. He is so terrified of losing his sources of
Narcissistic Supply (and of being emotionally hurt) that
he would rather "control", "master", or "direct" the
potentially destabilising situation. Remember: the
personality of the narcissist has a low level of
organization. It is precariously balanced.
Being abandoned could cause a narcissistic injury so

grave that the whole edifice can come crumbling down.
Narcissists usually entertain suicidal ideation in such
cases. But, if the narcissist had initiated and directed his
own abandonment, if it is perceived as a goal he set to
himself – he can and does avoid all these untoward
consequences. (See the section about Emotional
Involvement Prevention Mechanisms in the Essay.)
The Dynamics of the Relationship
The narcissist lives in a fantasised world of ideal beauty,

incomparable (imaginary) achievements, wealth,
brilliance and unmitigated success. The narcissist denies
his reality constantly. This is what I call the Grandiosity
Gap – the abyss between his sense of entitlement
grounded in his inflated grandiose fantasies – and his
incommensurate reality and meagre accomplishments.
The narcissist's partner is perceived by him to be merely

a Source of Narcissistic Supply, an instrument, an
extension of himself. It is inconceivable that – blessed
by the constant presence of the narcissist – such a tool
would malfunction. The needs and grievances of the
partner are perceived by the narcissist as threats and
slights.
The narcissist considers his very presence in the

relationship as nourishing and sustaining. He feels
entitled to the best others can offer without investing in
maintaining his relationships or in catering to the well-
being of his "suppliers". To rid himself of deep-set
feelings of (rather justified) guilt and shame – he
pathologizes the partner.
He projects his own mental illness unto her. Through the

intricate mechanism of projective identification he
forces her to play an emergent role of "the sick" or "the
weak" or "the naive" or "the dumb" or "the no good".
What he denies in himself, what he is loath to face in his
own personality – he attributes to others and moulds
them to conform to his prejudices against himself.
The narcissist must have the best, the most glamorous,
stunning, talented, head turning, mind-boggling spouse
in the entire world. Nothing short of this fantasy will do.
To compensate for the shortcomings of his real life
spouse – he invents an idealised figure and relates to it
instead.
Then, when reality conflicts too often and too evidently

with this figment – he reverts to devaluation. His
behaviour turns on a dime and becomes threatening,
demeaning, contemptuous, berating, reprimanding,
destructively critical and sadistic – or cold, unloving,
detached, and "clinical". He punishes his real life spouse
for not living up to his fantasy, for "refusing" to be his
Galathea, his Pygmalion, his ideal creation. The
narcissist plays a wrathful and demanding God.
Moving On
To preserve one's mental health – one must abandon the

narcissist. One must move on.
Moving on is a process, not a decision or an event. First,

one has to acknowledge and accept painful reality. Such
acceptance is a volcanic, shattering, agonising series of
nibbling thoughts and strong resistances. Once the battle
is won, and harsh and agonizing realities are
assimilated, one can move on to the learning phase.
Learning
We label. We educate ourselves. We compare

experiences. We digest. We have insights.
Then we decide and we act. This is "to move on".
Having gathered sufficient emotional sustenance,
knowledge, support and confidence, we face the
battlefields of our relationships, fortified and nurtured.
This stage characterises those who do not mourn – but
fight; do not grieve – but replenish their self-esteem; do
not hide – but seek; do not freeze – but move on.
Grieving
Having been betrayed and abused – we grieve. We

grieve for the image we had of the traitor and abuser –
the image that was so fleeting and so wrong. We mourn
the damage he did to us. We experience the fear of never
being able to love or to trust again – and we grieve this
loss. In one stroke, we lost someone we trusted and even
loved, we lost our trusting and loving selves and we lost
the trust and love that we felt. Can anything be worse?
The emotional process of grieving has many phases.
At first, we are dumbfounded, shocked, inert, immobile.

We play dead to avoid our inner monsters. We are
ossified in our pain, cast in the mould of our reticence
and fears. Then we feel enraged, indignant, rebellious
and hateful. Then we accept. Then we cry. And then –
some of us – learn to forgive and to pity. And this is
called healing.
All stages are absolutely necessary and good for you. It

is bad not to rage back, not to shame those who shamed
us, to deny, to pretend, to evade. But it is equally bad to
get fixated on our rage. Permanent grieving is the
perpetuation of our abuse by other means.
By endlessly recreating our harrowing experiences, we
unwillingly collaborate with our abuser to perpetuate his
or her evil deeds. It is by moving on that we defeat our
abuser, minimising him and his importance in our lives.
It is by loving and by trusting anew that we annul that
which was done to us. To forgive is never to forget. But
to remember is not necessarily to re-experience.
Forgiving and Forgetting
Forgiving is an important capability. It does more for

the forgiver than for the forgiven. But it should not be a
universal, indiscriminate behaviour. It is legitimate not
to forgive sometimes. It depends, of course, on the
severity or duration of what was done to you.
In general, it is unwise and counter-productive to apply

to life "universal" and "immutable" principles. Life is
too chaotic to succumb to rigid edicts. Sentences which
start with "I never" or "I always" are not very credible
and often lead to self-defeating, self-restricting and self-
destructive behaviours.
Conflicts are an important and integral part of life. One

should never seek them out, but when confronted with a
conflict, one should not avoid it. It is through conflicts
and adversity as much as through care and love that we
grow.
Human relationships are dynamic. We must assess our

friendships, partnerships, even our marriages
periodically. In and by itself, a common past is
insufficient to sustain a healthy, nourishing, supportive,
caring and compassionate relationship. Common
memories are a necessary but not a sufficient condition.
We must gain and regain our friendships on a daily
basis. Human relationships are a constant test of
allegiance and empathy.
Remaining Friends with the Narcissist
Can't we act civilised and remain on friendly terms with

our narcissist ex?
Never forget that narcissists (full fledged ones) are nice

and friendly only when:
a. They want something from you – Narcissistic

Supply, help, support, votes, money… They
prepare the ground, manipulate you and then
come out with the "small favour" they need or
ask you blatantly or surreptitiously for
Narcissistic Supply ("What did you think about
my performance…", "Do you think that I really
deserve the Nobel Prize?").
b. They feel threatened and they want to neuter the

threat by smothering it with oozing pleasantries.
c. They have just been infused with an overdose of

Narcissistic Supply and they feel magnanimous
and magnificent and ideal and perfect. To show
magnanimity is a way of flaunting one's
impeccable divine credentials. It is an act of
grandiosity. You are an irrelevant prop in this
spectacle, a mere receptacle of the narcissist's
overflowing, self-contented infatuation with his
False Self.
This beneficence is transient. Perpetual victims often
tend to thank the narcissist for "little graces". This is the
Stockholm syndrome: hostages tend to emotionally
identify with their captors rather than with the police.
We are grateful to our abusers and tormentors for
ceasing their hideous activities and allowing us to catch
our breath.
Some people say that they prefer to live with narcissists,

to cater to their needs and to succumb to their whims
because this is the way they have been conditioned in
early childhood. It is only with narcissists that they feel
alive, stimulated and excited. The world glows in
Technicolor in the presence of a narcissist and decays to
sepia colours in his absence.
I see nothing inherently "wrong" with that. The test is

this: if someone were to constantly humiliate and abuse
you verbally using Archaic Chinese – would you have
felt humiliated and abused? Probably not. Some people
have been conditioned by the narcissistic Primary
Objects in their lives (parents or caregivers) to treat
narcissistic abuse as Archaic Chinese, to turn a deaf ear.
This technique is effective in that it allows the inverted

narcissist (the narcissist's willing mate) to experience
only the good aspects of living with a narcissist: his
sparkling intelligence, the constant drama and
excitement, the lack of intimacy and emotional
attachment (some people prefer this). Every now and
then the narcissist breaks into abuse in Archaic Chinese.
So what, who understands Archaic Chinese anyway,
says the Inverted Narcissist to herself.
I have only one nagging doubt, though:

If the relationship with a narcissist is so rewarding, why
are inverted narcissists so unhappy, so ego-dystonic, so
in need of help (professional or otherwise)? Aren't they
victims who simply experience the Stockholm
syndrome (=identifying with the kidnapper rather than
with the Police) and who deny their own torment?
Narcissists and Abandonment
Narcissists are terrified of being abandoned exactly as

are codependents and Borderlines.
But their solution is different.
Codependents cling. Borderlines are emotionally labile

and react disastrously to the faintest hint of being
abandoned.
Narcissists facilitate their own abandonment. They

make sure that they are abandoned.
This way they achieve two goals:
1. Getting it over with – The narcissist has a very

low threshold of tolerance to uncertainty and
inconvenience, emotional or material.
Narcissists are very impatient and "spoiled".
They cannot delay gratification or impending
doom. They must have it all now, good or bad.
2. By bringing the feared abandonment about, the

narcissist can lie to himself persuasively. "She
didn't abandon me, it is I who abandoned her. I
controlled the situation. It was all my doing, so I
was really not abandoned, was I now?" In time,
the narcissist adopts this "official version" as the
truth. He might say: "I abandoned her
emotionally and sexually long before she left."
This is one of the important Emotional Involvement

Prevention Mechanisms (EIPM) that I write about in
the Essay.
Why the Failing Relationships?
Narcissists hate happiness and joy and ebullience and

vivaciousness – in short, they hate life itself.
The roots of this bizarre propensity can be traced to a

few psychological dynamics, which operate
concurrently (it is very confusing to be a narcissist).
First, there is pathological envy.
The narcissist is constantly envious of other people:

their successes, their property, their character, their
education, their children, their ideas, the fact that they
can feel, their good moods, their past, their future, their
present, their spouses, their mistresses or lovers, their
location…
Almost anything can be the trigger of a bout of biting,

acidulous envy. But there is nothing, which reminds the
narcissist more of the totality of his envious experiences
than happiness. Narcissists lash out at happy people out
of their own nagging sense of deprivation.
Then there is narcissistic hurt.

The narcissist regards himself as the centre of the world
and the epicentre of the lives of his closest, nearest and
dearest. He is the source of all emotions, responsible for
all developments, positive and negative alike, the axis,
the prime cause, the only cause, the mover, the shaker,
the broker, the pillar, forever indispensable.
It is therefore a bitter and sharp rebuke to this grandiose

fantasy to see someone else happy for reasons that have
nothing to do with the narcissist. It painfully serves to
illustrate to him that he is but one of many causes,
phenomena, triggers and catalysts in other people's
lives. That there are things happening outside the orbit
of his control or initiative. That he is not privileged or
unique.
The narcissist uses projective identification. He

channels his negative emotions through other people,
his proxies. He induces unhappiness and gloom in
others to enable him to experience his own misery.
Inevitably, he attributes the source of such sadness
either to himself, as its cause – or to the "pathology" of
the sad person.
"You are constantly depressed, you should really see a

therapist" is a common sentence.
The narcissist – in an effort to maintain the depressive

state until it serves some cathartic purpose – strives to
perpetuate it by constantly reminding of its existence.
"You look sad/bad/pale today. Is anything wrong? Can I
help you? Things haven't been going so well lately?"
Last but not least is the exaggerated fear of losing

control.
The narcissist feels that he controls his human
environment mostly by manipulation and mainly by
emotional extortion and distortion. This is not far from
reality. The narcissist suppresses any sign of emotional
autonomy. He feels threatened and belittled by an
emotion not directly or indirectly fostered by him or by
his actions. Counteracting someone else's happiness is
the narcissist's way of reminding everyone: I am here, I
am omnipotent, you are at my mercy and you will feel
happy only when I tell you to.
Living with a Narcissist
You cannot change people, not in the real, profound,

deep sense. You can only adapt to them and adapt them
to you. If you do find your narcissist rewarding at times
– you should consider doing these:
1. Determine your limits and boundaries. How

much and in which ways can you adapt to him
(i.e., accept him AS HE IS) and to which extent
and in which ways would you like him to adapt
to you (i.e., accept you as you are). Act
accordingly. Accept what you have decided to
accept and reject the rest. Change in you what
you are willing and able to change – and ignore
the rest. Conclude an unwritten contract of co-
existence (could be written if you are more
formally inclined).
2. Try to maximise the number of times that "…his

walls are down", that you "…find him totally
fascinating and everything I desire". What
makes him be and behave this way? Is it
something that you say or do? Is it preceded by
events of a specific nature? Is there anything you
can do to make him behave this way more often?
Remember, though:
Sometimes we mistake guilt and self-assumed blame for

love.
Committing suicide for someone else's sake is not love.
Sacrificing yourself for someone else is not love.
It is domination, codependence, and counter-

dependence.
You control your narcissist by giving, as much as he

controls you through his pathology.
Your unconditional generosity sometimes prevents him

from facing his True Self and thus healing.
It is impossible to have a relationship with a narcissist

that is meaningful to the narcissist.
It is, of course, possible to have a relationship with a

narcissist that is meaningful to you (see FAQ 66).
You modify your behaviour in order to secure the

narcissist's continuing love, not in order to be
abandoned.
This is the root of the perniciousness of this

phenomenon:
The narcissist is a meaningful, crucially significant
figure ("object") in the inverted narcissist's life.
This is the narcissist's leverage over the inverted

narcissist. And since the inverted narcissist is usually
very young when making the adaptation to the narcissist
– it all boils down to fear of abandonment and death in
the absence of care and sustenance.
The inverted narcissist's accommodation of the

narcissist is as much a wish to gratify one's narcissist
(parent) as the sheer terror of forever withholding
gratification from one's self.
The Need to be Hopeful
I understand the need to be hopeful.
There are gradations of narcissism. In my writings I am

referring to the extreme and ultimate form of
narcissism, the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
The prognosis for those merely with narcissistic traits or
a narcissistic style is far better than the healing
prospects of a full-fledged narcissist.
We often confuse shame with guilt.
Narcissists feel shameful when confronted with a

failure. They feel (narcissistically) injured. Their
omnipotence is threatened, their sense of perfection and
uniqueness is questioned. They are enraged, engulfed by
self-reprimand, self-loathing and internalised violent
urges.
The narcissist punishes himself for failing to be God –
not for mistreating others.
The narcissist makes an effort to communicate his pain

and shame in order to elicit the Narcissistic Supply he
needs to restore and regulate his failing sense of self-
worth. In doing so, the narcissist resorts to the human
vocabulary of empathy. The narcissist will say anything
to obtain Narcissistic Supply. It is a manipulative ploy –
not a confession of real emotions or an authentic
description of internal dynamics.
Yes, the narcissist is a child – but a very young one.
Yes, he can tell right from wrong – but is indifferent to

both.
Yes, a process of "re-parenting" (what Kohut called a

"self-object") is required to foster growth and
maturation. In the best of cases, it takes years and the
prognosis is dismal.
Yes, some narcissists make it. And their mates or

spouses or children or colleagues or lovers rejoice.
But is the fact that people survive tornadoes – a reason

to go out and seek one?
The narcissist is very much attracted to vulnerability, to

unstable or disordered personalities or to his inferiors.
Such people constitute secure Sources of Narcissistic
Supply. The inferior offer adulation. The mentally
disturbed, the traumatised, the abused become
dependent and addicted to him. The vulnerable can be
easily and economically manipulated without fear of
repercussions.
I think that "a healed narcissist" is a contradiction in

terms, an oxymoron (though there may be exceptions, of
course).
Still, healing (not only of narcissists) is dependent upon

and derived from a sense of security in a relationship.
The narcissist is not particularly interested in healing.

He tries to optimise his returns, taking into
consideration the scarcity and finiteness of his
resources. Healing, to him, is simply a bad business
proposition.
In the narcissist's world being accepted or cared for (not

to mention loved) is a foreign language. It is
meaningless.
One might recite the most delicate haiku in Japanese

and it would still remain meaningless to a non-Japanese.
That non-Japanese are not adept at Japanese does not

diminish the value of the haiku or of the Japanese
language, needless to say.
Narcissists damage and hurt but they do so offhandedly

and naturally, as an after-thought and reflexively.
They are aware of what they are doing to others – but

they do not care.
Sometimes, they sadistically taunt and torment people –
but they do not perceive this to be evil – merely
amusing.
They feel that they are entitled to their pleasure and

gratification (Narcissistic Supply is often obtained by
subjugating and subsuming others).
They feel that others are less than human, mere

extensions of the narcissist, or instruments to fulfil the
narcissist's wishes and obey his often capricious
commands.
The narcissist feels that no evil can be inflicted on

machines, instruments, or extensions. He feels that his
needs justify his actions.
Also Read
Codependence, Counterdependence and Dependent

Personality Disorder
The Dependent
Back to La-la Land
Other People's Pain
A Letter about Trust
The Guilt of Others
Narcissism By Proxy
The Narcissistic Couple
The Narcissist as a Sadist
Abusing the Narcissist
How to Cope with a Narcissist
The Extramarital Narcissist
The Spouse / Mate / Partner
Exploitation by a Narcissist
The Narcissist and His Family
Narcissists, Sex and Fidelity
The Victims of the Narcissist
Narcissism, Love and Healing
The Vindictive Narcissist
Narcissists and Women
The Two Loves of the Narcissist
Grandiosity and Intimacy - The Roots of Paranoia

Recovery and Healing from Trauma and Abuse
The Conflicts of Therapy
Return
Question:
If the narcissist is as abusive as you say – why do we

react so badly when he leaves?
Answer:
At the commencement of the relationship, the Narcissist

is a dream-come-true. He is often intelligent, witty,
charming, good looking, an achiever, empathetic, in
need of love, loving, caring, attentive and much more.
He is the perfect bundled answer to the nagging
questions of life: finding meaning, companionship,
compatibility and happiness. He is, in other words,
ideal.
It is difficult to let go of this idealized figure.

Relationships with narcissists inevitably and invariably
end with the dawn of a double realisation. The first is
that one has been (ab)used by the narcissist and the
second is that one was regarded by the narcissist as a
disposable, dispensable and interchangeable instrument
(object).
The assimilation of this new gained knowledge is an

excruciating process, often unsuccessfully completed.
People get fixated at different stages. They fail to come
to terms with their rejection as human beings – the most
total form of rejection there is.
We all react to loss. Loss makes us feel helpless and
objectified. When our loved ones die – we feel that
Nature or God or Life treated us as playthings. When we
divorce (especially if we did not initiate the break-up),
we often feel that we have been exploited and abused in
the relationship, that we are being "dumped", that our
needs and emotions are ignored. In short, we again feel
objectified.
Losing the narcissist is no different to any other major

loss in life. It provokes a cycle of bereavement and grief
(as well as some kind of mild post traumatic stress
syndrome in cases of severe abuse). This cycle has four
phases: denial, rage, sadness and acceptance.
Denial can assume many forms. Some go on pretending

that the narcissist is still a part of their life, even going
to the extreme of "interacting" with the narcissist by
pretending to "communicate" with him or to "meet" him
(through others, for instance).
Others develop persecutory delusions, thus

incorporating the imaginary narcissist into their lives as
an ominous and dark presence. This ensures "his"
continued "interest" in them – however malevolent and
threatening that "interest" is perceived to be. These are
radical denial mechanisms, which border on the
psychotic and often dissolve into brief psychotic micro-
episodes.
More benign and transient forms of denial include the

development of ideas of reference. The narcissist's every
move or utterance is interpreted to be directed at the
suffering person, his ex, and to carry a hidden message
which can be "decoded" only by the recipient.
Others deny the very narcissistic nature of the narcissist.
They attribute his abusive conduct to ignorance,
mischief, lack of self-control (due to childhood abuse or
trauma), or benign intentions. This denial mechanism
leads them to believe that the narcissist is really not a
narcissist but someone who is not aware of his "true"
being, or someone who merely and innocently enjoys
mind games and toying with people's lives, or an
unwitting part of a dark conspiracy to defraud and abuse
gullible victims.
Often the narcissist is depicted as obsessed or possessed

– imprisoned by his "invented" condition and, really,
deep inside, a nice and gentle and lovable person. At the
healthier end of the spectrum of denial reactions we find
the classical denial of loss – the disbelief, the hope that
the narcissist may return, the suspension and repression
of all information to the contrary.
Denial in mentally healthy people quickly evolves into

rage. There are a few types of rage. Rage can be
focussed and directed at the narcissist, at other
facilitators of the loss, such as the narcissist's lover, or at
specific circumstances. It can be directed at oneself –
which often leads to depression, suicidal ideation, self-
mutilation and, in some cases, suicide. Or, it can be
diffuse, all-pervasive, all-encompassing and engulfing.
Such loss-related rage can be intense and in bursts or
osmotic and permeate the whole emotional landscape.
Rage gives place to sadness. It is the sadness of the

trapped animal, an existential angst mixed with acute
depression. It involves dysphoria (inability to rejoice, to
be optimistic, or expectant) and anhedonia (inability to
experience pleasure or to find meaning in life). It is a
paralysing sensation, which slows one down and
enshrouds everything in the grey veil of randomness. It
all looks meaningless and empty.
This, in turn, gives place to gradual acceptance, renewed

energy, and bouts of activity. The narcissist is gone both
physically and mentally. The void left in his wake still
hurts and pangs of regret and hope still exist. But, on the
whole, the narcissist is transformed into a narrative, a
symbol, another life experience, or a (tedious) cliché.
He is no longer omni-present and his former victim
entertains no delusions as to the one-sided and abusive
nature of the relationship or as to the possibility and
desirability of its renewal.
Also Read
Ideas of Reference
Back to La-la Land

Recovery and Healing from Trauma and Abuse
The Conflicts of Therapy
Return
The Clinical Picture and Developmental Roots -

Opening Remarks
Terminology
Codependents
People who depend on other people for their emotional

gratification and the performance of Ego or daily
functions. They are needy, demanding, and submissive.
They fear abandonment, cling and display immature
behaviours in their effort to maintain the "relationship"
with their companion or mate upon whom they depend.
No matter what abuse is inflicted upon them – they
remain in the relationship. By eagerly becoming
victims, codependents seek to control their abusers.
See also a description of the Dependent Personality

Disorder - or its definition in the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual (DSM-IV-TR, 2000).
Inverted Narcissist
Also called "covert narcissist", this is a co-dependent

who depends exclusively on narcissists (narcissist-co-
dependent). If you are living with a narcissist, have a
relationship with one, if you are married to one, if you
are working with a narcissist, etc. – it does NOT mean
that you are an inverted narcissist.
To "qualify" as an inverted narcissist, you must CRAVE

to be in a relationship with a narcissist, regardless of
any abuse inflicted on you by him/her. You must
ACTIVELY seek relationships with narcissists and
ONLY with narcissists, no matter what your (bitter and
traumatic) past experience has been. You must feel
EMPTY and UNHAPPY in relationships with ANY
OTHER kind of person. Only then, and if you satisfy
the other diagnostic criteria of a Dependent Personality
Disorder, can you be safely labelled an "inverted
narcissist".
Counterdependents
Most "classical" (overt) narcissists are

counterdependent. Their emotions and needs are buried
under "scar tissue" which had formed, coalesced, and
hardened during years of one form of abuse or another.
Grandiosity, a sense of entitlement, a lack of empathy,
and overweening haughtiness usually hide gnawing
insecurity and a fluctuating sense of self-worth.
Counterdependents are contumacious (reject and

despise authority), fiercely independent, controlling,
self-centered, and aggressive. They fear intimacy and
are locked into cycles of hesitant approach followed by
avoidance of commitment. They are "lone wolves" and
bad team players.
Counterdependence is a reaction formation. The

counterdependent dreads his own weaknesses. He seeks
to overcome them by projecting an image of
omnipotence, omniscience, success, self-sufficiency,
and superiority.
Introduction
Codependence is an important and integral part of

narcissism. Narcissists are either counterdependent or
codependent (Inverted).
The DSM-IV-TR uses 9 criteria to define the

Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD). It is sufficient
to show signs of 5 of them to be diagnosed as a
narcissist. Thus, theoretically, it is possible to have NPD
without being grandiose.
Many researchers (Alexander Lowen, Jeffrey Satinover,

Theodore Millon and others) suggested a "taxonomy" of
pathological narcissism. They divided narcissists to sub-
groups (very much as I did with my somatic versus
cerebral narcissist dichotomy).
Lowen, for instance, talks about the "phallic" narcissist

versus others. Satinover and Millon make a very
important distinction between narcissists who were
raised by "classically" abusive parents – and those who
were raised by doting and smothering or domineering
mothers.
Glenn O. Gabbard in "Psychodynamic Psychiatry in

Clinical Practice" [The DSM-IV-TR Edition. Comments
on Cluster B Personality Disorders – Narcissistic.
American Psychiatric Press, Inc., 2000] we find this:
"…what definitive criteria can be used to differentiate

healthy from pathological narcissism? The time
honoured criteria of psychological health – to love and
to work – are only partly useful in answering this
question."
"An individual's work history may provide little help

in making the distinction. Highly disturbed narcissistic
individuals may find extraordinary success in certain
professions, such as big business, the arts, politics, the
entertainment industry, athletics and televangelism
field. In some cases, however, narcissistic pathology
may be reflected in a superficial quality to one's
professional interests, as though achievement in and
acclaim are more important than mastery of the field
itself.
Pathological forms of narcissism are more easily

identified by the quality of the individual's
relationships.
One tragedy affecting these people is their inability to

love. Healthy interpersonal relationships can be
recognised by qualities such as empathy and concern
for the feelings of others, a genuine interest in the
ideas of others, the ability to tolerate ambivalence in
long-term relationships without giving up, and a
capacity to acknowledge one's own contribution to
interpersonal conflicts. People who are characterised
by these qualities may at times use others to gratify
their own needs, but the tendency occurs in the
broader context of sensitive interpersonal relatedness
rather than as a pervasive style of dealing with other
people. One the other hand, the person with a
Narcissistic Personality Disorder approaches people as
objects to be used up and discarded according to his or
her needs, without regard for their feelings.
People are not viewed as having a separate existence
or as having needs of their own. The individual with a
Narcissistic Personality Disorder frequently ends a
relationship after a short time, usually when the other
person begins to make demands stemming from for his
or her own needs. Most importantly, such
relationships clearly do not 'work' in terms of the
narcissist's ability to maintain his or her own sense of
self-esteem."
"…These criteria [the DSM-IV-TR's] identify a

certain kind of narcissistic patient – specifically, the
arrogant, boastful, 'noisy' individual who demands to
be in the spotlight. However, they fail to characterise
the shy, quietly grandiose, narcissistic individual
whose extreme sensitivity to slights leads to an
assiduous avoidance of the spotlight."
The DSM-III-R alluded to at least two types of

narcissists, but the DSM-IV-TR committee chose to
delete this:
"…included criterion, 'reacts to criticism with feelings

of rage, shame, or humiliation (even not if expressed)'
due to lack of 'specificity'."
Other theoreticians, clinicians and researchers similarly

suggested a division between "the oblivious narcissist"
(a.k.a. overt) and "the hypervigilant narcissist" (a.k.a.
covert).
The Compensatory versus the Classic Narcissist
Another interesting distinction, suggested by Dave

Kelly in his excellent PTYPES Web site
(http://www.ptypes.com) is between the Compensatory
Type NPD and the Classic NPD (described in the DSM-
IV-TR).
Here are the Compensatory NPD criteria according to

Dave Kelly:
"Personality Types proposes Compensatory

Narcissistic Personality Disorder as a pervasive
pattern of unstable, covert narcissistic behaviours that
derive from an underlying sense of insecurity and
weakness rather than from genuine feelings of self-
confidence and high self-esteem, beginning by early
adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as
indicated by six (or more) of the criteria below.
The basic trait of the Compensatory Narcissistic

Personality Type is a pattern of overtly narcissistic
behaviours (that) derive from an underlying sense of
insecurity and weakness, rather than from genuine
feelings of self-confidence and high self-esteem."
The Compensatory Narcissistic Personality Type:
• Seeks to create an illusion of superiority and to

build up an image of high self-worth [Millon];
• Strives for recognition and prestige to
compensate for the lack of a feeling of self-
worth;
• May "acquire a deprecatory attitude in which
the achievements of others are ridiculed and
degraded" [Millon];
• Has persistent aspirations for glory and status
[Millon];
• Has a tendency to exaggerate and boast
[Millon];
• Is sensitive to how others react to him, watches
and listens carefully for critical judgement, and
feels slighted by disapproval [Millon];
• "Is prone to feel shamed and humiliated and
especially (anxious) and vulnerable to the
judgements of others" [Millon];
• Covers up a sense of inadequacy and
deficiency with pseudo-arrogance and pseudo-
grandiosity [Millon];
• Has a tendency to periodic hypochondria
[Forman];
• Alternates between feelings of emptiness and
deadness and states of excitement and excess
energy [Forman];
• Entertains fantasies of greatness, constantly
striving for perfection, genius, or stardom
[Forman];
• Has a history of searching for an idealised
partner and has an intense need for
affirmation and confirmation in relationships
[Forman];
• Frequently entertains a wishful, exaggerated
and unrealistic concept of himself, which he
can't possibly measure up to [Reich];
• Produces (too quickly) work not up to the level
of his abilities because of an overwhelmingly
strong need for the immediate gratification of
success [Reich];
• Is touchy, quick to take offence at the slightest
provocation, continually anticipating attack
and danger, reacting with anger and fantasies
of revenge when he feels himself frustrated in
his need for constant admiration [Reich];
• Is self-conscious, due to a dependence on
approval from others [Reich];
• Suffers regularly from repetitive oscillations of
self-esteem [Reich];
• Seeks to undo feelings of inadequacy by
forcing everyone's attention and admiration
upon himself [Reich];
• May react with self-contempt and depression to
the lack of fulfilment of his grandiose
expectations [Riso].
Sources:
Forman, Max. Narcissistic Disorders and the Oedipal

Fixations. In Feldstein, J.J. (Ed.), The Annual of
Psychoanalysis. Volume IV. New York: International
Universities [1976] pp. 65-92.
Millon, Theodore, and Roger D. Davis. Disorders of

Personality: DSM-IV and Beyond. 2nd Ed. New York:
Wiley, [1996] pp. 411-12.
Reich, Annie, [1986]. Pathological Forms of Self-

Esteem Regulation. In Morrison, A. P., (Ed.),
Essential Papers on Narcissism. pp. 44-60. Reprint
from 1960. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. Volume
15, pp. 205-32.
Riso, Don Richard. Personality Types: Using the

Enneagram for Self-Discovery. Boston: Houghton
Mifflin [1987] pp. 102-3.
Speculative Diagnostic Criteria for Compensatory

Narcissistic Personality Disorder
A pervasive pattern of self-inflation, pseudo-
confidence, exhibitionism, and strivings for prestige,
that compensates for feelings of inadequacy and low
self-esteem, as indicated by the following:
• Pseudo-confidence compensating for an

underlying condition of insecurity and feelings
of helplessness;
• Pretentiousness, self-inflation;
• Exhibitionism in the pursuit of attention,
recognition, and glory;
• Strivings for prestige to enhance self-esteem;
• Deceitfulness and manipulativeness in the
service of maintaining feelings of superiority;
• Idealisation in relationships;
• Fragmentation of the self: feelings of
emptiness and deadness;
• A proud, hubristic disposition;
• Hypochondriasis;
• Substance abuse;
• Self-destructiveness.
Compensatory Narcissistic Personality Disorder

corresponds to Ernest Jones' narcissistic "God
Complex", Annie Reich's "Compensatory
Narcissism", Heinz Kohut's "Narcissistic Personality
Disorder", and Theodore Millon's "Compensatory
Narcissist".
Millon, Theodore, and Roger D. Davis. Disorders of

Personality: DSM-IV and Beyond. 2nd ed. New York:
Wiley, 1996. 411-12.
Compare this to the classic type:

Narcissistic Personality Type
The basic trait of the Narcissistic Personality Type is a

pattern of grandiosity, need for admiration, and lack of
empathy.
The Narcissistic Personality Type:
• Reacts to criticism with feelings of rage, shame,

or humiliation;
• Is interpersonally exploitive: takes advantage of
others to achieve his own ends;
• Has a grandiose sense of self-importance;
• Believes that his problems are unique and can be
understood only by other special people;
• Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited
success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love;
• Has a sense of entitlement: an unreasonable
expectation of especially favourable treatment;
• Requires much attention and admiration of
others;
• Lacks empathy: fails to recognise and
experience how others feel;
• Is preoccupied with feelings of envy.
This is mainly the DSM-III-R view. Pay attention to the

not so subtle changes in the DSM-IV-TR – click here to
view them and here for more about pathological
narcissism.
It is clear that there is, indeed, an hitherto neglected type

of narcissist. It is the "self-effacing" or "introverted"
narcissist. We call it the Inverted Narcissist (hereinafter:
IN). Others call it "narcissist-codependent" or "N-
magnet" (which erroneously implies passivity and
victimhood). Alan Rappaport suggested the name (and
diagnosis) "co-narcissist".
This is a narcissist who, in many respects, is the mirror

image of the "classical" narcissist. The psychodynamics
of the Inverted Narcissist are not clear, nor are its
developmental roots. Perhaps it is the product of an
overweening Primary Object or caregiver. Perhaps
excessive abuse leads to the repression of even the
narcissistic and other defence mechanisms. Perhaps the
parents suppress every manifestation of grandiosity
(very common in early childhood) and of narcissism –
so that the narcissistic defence mechanism is "inverted"
and internalised in this unusual form.
These narcissists are self-effacing, sensitive,

emotionally fragile, sometimes socially phobic. They
derive all their self-esteem and sense of self-worth from
the outside (others), are pathologically envious (a
transformation of aggression), are likely to
intermittently engage in aggressive/violent behaviours,
are more emotionally labile than the classic narcissist,
etc.
There are, therefore, three "basic" types of narcissists:
1. The offspring of neglecting parents – They

default to narcissism as the predominant object
relation (with themselves as the exclusive love
object).
2. The offspring of doting or domineering parents

(often narcissists themselves) – They internalise
their parents' voices in the form of a sadistic,
ideal, immature Superego and spend their lives
trying to be perfect, omnipotent, omniscient and
to be judged "a success" by these parent-images
and their later representations and substitutes
(authority figures).
3. The offspring of abusive parents – They

internalise the abusing, demeaning and
contemptuous voices and spend their lives in an
effort to elicit "counter-voices" from other
people and thus to regulate their labile self-
esteem and sense of self-worth.
All three types experience recurrent and Sisyphean

failures. Shielded by their defence mechanisms, they
constantly gauge reality wrongly, their actions and
reactions become more and more rigid and the damage
inflicted by them on themselves and on others is ever
greater.
The narcissistic parent seems to employ a myriad

primitive defences in his dealings with his children:
Splitting – Idealising the child and devaluing him in

cycles, which reflect the internal dynamics of the parent
rather than anything the child does.
Projective Identification – Forcing the child to behave

in a way which vindicates the parent's fears regarding
himself or herself, his or her self-image and his or her
self-worth. This is a particularly powerful and
pernicious mechanism. If the narcissist parent fears his
own deficiencies ("defects"), vulnerability, perceived
weaknesses, susceptibility, gullibility, or emotions – he
is likely to force the child to "feel" these rejected and (to
him) repulsive emotions, to behave in ways strongly
abhorred by the parent, to exhibit character traits the
parent strongly rejects in himself.
Projection - The child, in a way, becomes the "trash

bin" of the parents' inhibitions, fears, self-loathing, self-
contempt, perceived lack of self-worth, sense of
inadequacy, rejected traits, repressed emotions, failures
and emotional reticence.
Coupled with the parent's treatment of the child as the

parent's extension, these psychological defenses totally
inhibit the psychological growth and emotional
maturation of the child. The child becomes a reflection
of the parent, a conduit through which the parent
experiences and realises himself for better (hopes,
aspirations, ambition, life goals) and for worse
(weaknesses, "undesirable" emotions, "negative" traits).
Relationships between such parents and their progeny

easily deteriorate to sexual or other modes of abuse
because there are no functioning boundaries between
them.
It seems that the child's reaction to a narcissistic parent

can be either accommodation and assimilation or
rejection.
Accommodation and Assimilation
The child accommodates, idealises and internalises

(introjects) the narcissistic and abusive Primary Object
successfully. This means that the child's "internal voice"
is also narcissistic and abusive. The child tries to
comply with its directives and with its explicit and
perceived wishes.
The child becomes a masterful provider of Narcissistic

Supply, a perfect match to the parent's personality, an
ideal source, an accommodating, understanding and
caring caterer to all the needs, whims, mood swings and
cycles of the narcissist. The child learns to endure
devaluation and idealisation with equanimity and adapt
to the narcissist's world view. The child, in short,
becomes the ultimate extension. This is what we call an
"inverted narcissist".
We must not neglect the abusive aspect of such a

relationship. The narcissistic parent always alternates
between idealisation and devaluation of his offspring.
The child is likely to internalise the devaluing, abusive,
critical, demeaning, berating, diminishing, minimising,
upbraiding, chastising voices.
The parent (or caregiver) goes on to survive inside the

child-turned-adult (as part of a sadistic and ideal
Superego and an unrealistic Ego Ideal). These voices are
so powerful that they inhibit even the development of
reactive narcissism, the child's typical defence
mechanism.
The child-turned-adult keeps looking for narcissists in

order to feel whole, alive and wanted. He craves to be
treated by a narcissist narcissistically. What others call
abuse is, to him or her, familiar territory and constitutes
Narcissistic Supply. To the Inverted Narcissist, the
classic narcissist is a Source of Supply (primary or
secondary) and his narcissistic behaviours constitute
Narcissistic Supply. The IN feels dissatisfied, empty and
unwanted when not "loved" by a narcissist.
The roles of Primary Source of Narcissistic Supply

(PSNS) and Secondary Source of Narcissistic Supply
(SSNS) are reversed. To the inverted narcissist, her
narcissistic spouse is a Source of PRIMARY
Narcissistic Supply.
The child can also reject the narcissistic parent rather

than accommodate her or him.
Rejection
The child may react to the narcissism of the Primary

Object with a peculiar type of rejection. He develops his
own narcissistic personality, replete with grandiosity
and lack of empathy – but his personality is antithetical
to that of the narcissistic parent.
If the parent were a somatic narcissist, the child is likely

to grow up to be a cerebral one. If his father prided
himself being virtuous, the son turns out sinful. If his
narcissistic mother bragged about her frugality, he is
bound to profligately flaunt his wealth.
An Attempted DSM Style List of Criteria
It is possible to compose a DSM-IV-TR-like set of

criteria for the Inverted Narcissist, using the classic
narcissists' as a template. The two are, in many ways,
two sides of the same coin, or "the mould and the
moulded" - hence the neologisms "mirror narcissist" or
"inverted narcissist".
The narcissist tries to merge with an idealised but badly
internalised object. He does so by "digesting" the
meaningful others in his life and transforming them into
extensions of his self. He uses various techniques to
achieve this. To the "digested", this is the crux of the
harrowing experience called "life with a narcissist".
The "inverted narcissist" (IN), on the other hand, does

not attempt, except in fantasy or in dangerous,
masochistic sexual practice, to merge with an idealised
external object. This is because he so successfully
internalised the narcissistic Primary Object to the
exclusion of all else. The IN feels ill at ease in his
relationships with non-narcissists because it is
unconsciously perceived by him to constitute "betrayal",
"cheating", an abrogation of the exclusivity clause he
has with the narcissistic Primary Object.
This is the big difference between narcissists and their

inverted version.
Classic narcissists of all stripes reject the Primary

Object in particular (and object relations in general) in
favour of a handy substitute: themselves.
Inverted Narcissists accept the (narcissist) Primary

Object and internalise it – to the exclusion of all others
(unless they are perceived to be faithful renditions,
replicas of the narcissistic Primary Object).
Criterion ONE
Possesses a rigid sense of lack of self-worth.

The classic narcissist has a badly regulated sense of
self-worth. However this is not conscious. He goes
through cycles of self-devaluation (and experiences
them as dysphorias).
The IN's sense of self-worth does not fluctuate. It is

rather stable – but it is very low. Whereas the narcissist
devalues others – the IN devalues himself as an
offering, a sacrifice to the narcissist. The IN pre-empts
the narcissist by devaluing himself, by actively berating
his own achievements, or talents. The IN is exceedingly
distressed when singled out because of actual
accomplishments or a demonstration of superior skills.
The inverted narcissist is compelled to filter all of her

narcissistic needs through the primary narcissist in her
life. Independence or personal autonomy are not
permitted. The IN feels amplified by the narcissist's
running commentary (because nothing can be
accomplished by the invert without the approval of a
primary narcissist in their lives).
Criterion TWO
Pre-occupied with fantasies of unlimited success,

power, brilliance and beauty or of an ideal of love.
This is the same as the DSM-IV-TR criterion for

Narcissistic Personality Disorder but, with the IN, it
manifests absolutely differently, i.e. the cognitive
dissonance is sharper here because the IN is so
absolutely and completely convinced of their
worthlessness that these fantasies of grandeur are
extremely painful "dissonances".
With the narcissist, the dissonance exists on two levels:
Between the unconscious feeling of lack of stable self-

worth and the grandiose fantasies
AND between the grandiose fantasies and reality (the

Grandiosity Gap).
In comparison, the Inverted Narcissist can only vacillate

between lack of self-worth and reality. No grandiosity is
permitted, except in dangerous, forbidden fantasy. This
shows that the Invert is psychologically incapable of
fully realising her inherent potentials without a primary
narcissist to filter the praise, adulation or
accomplishments through. She must have someone to
whom praise can be redirected. The dissonance between
the IN's certainty of self-worthlessness and genuine
praise that cannot be deflected is likely to emotionally
derail the Inverted Narcissist every time.
Criterion THREE
Believes that she is absolutely un-unique and un-

special (i.e., worthless and not worthy of merger with
the fantasised ideal) and that no one at all could
understand her because she is innately unworthy of
being understood. The IN becomes very agitated the
more one tries to understand her because that also
offends against her righteous sense of being properly
excluded from the human race.
A sense of worthlessness is typical of many other PDs

(as well as the feeling that no one could ever understand
them). The narcissist himself endures prolonged periods
of self-devaluation, self-deprecation and self-
effacement. This is part of the Narcissistic Cycle. In this
sense, the inverted narcissist is a partial narcissist. She
is permanently fixated in a part of the narcissistic cycle,
never to experience its complementary half: the
narcissistic grandiosity and sense of entitlement.
The "righteous sense of being properly excluded" comes

from the sadistic Superego in concert with the
"overbearing, externally reinforced, conscience".
Criterion FOUR
Demands anonymity (in the sense of seeking to remain

excluded at all costs) and is intensely irritated and
uncomfortable with any attention being paid to her –
similar to the Schizoid PD.
Criterion FIVE
Feels that she is undeserving and not entitled.
Feels that she is inferior to others, lacking, insubstantial,

unworthy, unlikable, unappealing, unlovable, someone
to scorn and dismiss, or to ignore.
Criterion SIX
Is extinguishingly selfless, sacrificial, even unctuous

in her interpersonal relationships and avoids the
assistance of others at all costs. Can only interact with
others when she can be seen to be giving, supportive,
and expending an unusual effort to assist.
Some narcissists behave the same way but only as a

means to obtain Narcissistic Supply (praise, adulation,
affirmation, attention). This must not be confused with
the behaviour of the IN.
Criterion SEVEN
Lacks empathy. Is intensely attuned to others' needs,

but only in so far as it relates to her own need to
perform the required self-sacrifice, which in turn is
necessary in order for the IN to obtain her Narcissistic
Supply from the primary narcissist.
By contrast, narcissists are never empathic. They are

intermittently attuned to others only in order to optimise
the extraction of Narcissistic Supply from them.
Criterion EIGHT
Envies others. Cannot conceive of being envied and

becomes extremely agitated and uncomfortable if even
brought into a situation where comparison might
occur. Loathes competition and avoids competition at
all costs, if there is any chance of actually winning the
competition, or being singled out.
Criterion NINE
Displays extreme shyness, lack of any real relational

connections, is publicly self-effacing in the extreme, is
internally highly moralistic and critical of others; is a
perfectionist and engages in lengthy ritualistic
behaviours, which can never be perfectly performed
(obsessive-compulsive, though not necessarily to the
full extent exhibited in Obsessive-Compulsive
Personality Disorder). Notions of being individualistic
are anathema.
The Reactive Patterns of the Inverted Narcissist (IN)

The Inverted Narcissist does not suffer from a "milder"
form of narcissism. Like the "classic" narcissists, it has
degrees and shades. But it is much more rare and the
DSM-IV-TR variety is the more prevalent.
The Inverted Narcissist is liable to react with rage

whenever threatened, or…
…When envious of other people's achievements, their

ability to feel wholeness, happiness, rewards and
successes, when her sense of self-worthlessness is
diminished by a behaviour, a comment, an event, when
her lack of self-worth and voided self-esteem is
threatened. Thus, this type of narcissist might
surprisingly react violently or wrathfully to GOOD
things: a kind remark, a mission accomplished, a
reward, a compliment, a proposition, or a sexual
advance.
…When thinking about the past, when emotions and

memories are evoked (usually negative ones) by certain
music, a given smell, or sight.
…When her pathological envy leads to an all-pervasive

sense of injustice and being discriminated against or
deprived by a spiteful world.
…When she comes across stupidity, avarice, dishonesty,

bigotry – it is these qualities in herself that all types of
narcissists really fear and reject so vehemently in others.
…When she believes that she failed (and she always

entertains this belief), that she is imperfect and useless
and worthless, a good for nothing half-baked creature.
…When she realises to what extent her inner demons
possess her, constrain her life, torment her, deform her
and the hopelessness of it all.
When the Inverted Narcissist rages, she becomes

verbally and emotionally abusive. She uncannily spots
and attacks the vulnerabilities of her target, and
mercilessly drives home the poisoned dagger of despair
and self-loathing until it infects her adversary.
The calm after such a storm is even eerier, a thundering

silence. The Inverted Narcissist regrets her behaviour
and admits her feelings while apologising profusely.
The Inverted Narcissist nurtures her negative emotions

as yet another weapon of self-destruction and self-
defeat. It is from this repressed self-contempt and
sadistic self-judgement that the narcissistic rage springs
forth.
One important difference between Inverted Narcissists

and non-narcissists is that the former are less likely to
react with PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)
following the breakup of their relationships with a their
narcissists. They seem to be "desensitised" to narcissists
by their early upbringing.
Whereas the reactions of normal people to narcissistic

behaviour patterns (and especially to the splitting and
projective identification defence mechanisms and to the
idealisation devaluation cycles) is shock, profound hurt
and disorientation – inverted narcissists show none of
the above.
The Life of the Inverted Narcissist
The IN is, usually, exceedingly and painfully shy as a

child. Despite this social phobia, his grandiosity
(absorbed from the parent) might direct him to seek
"limelight" professions and occupations, which involve
exposure, competition, "stage fright" and social friction.
The setting can vary from the limited (family) to the

expansive (national media) – but, whatever it is, the
result is constant conflict and feelings of discomfort,
even terror and extreme excitement and thrill
("adrenaline rush"). This is because the IN's grandiosity
is "imported" and not fully integrated. It is, therefore,
not supportive of his "grandiose" pursuits (as is the case
with the narcissist). On the contrary, the IN feels
awkward, pitted on the edge of a precipice, contrived,
false and misleading, not to say deceitful.
The Inverted Narcissist grows up in a stifling

environment, whether it is an orthodox, hyper-religious,
collectivist, or traditionalist culture, a monovalent,
"black and white", doctrinarian and indoctrinating
society – or a family which manifests all the above in a
microcosm all its own.
The Inverted Narcissist is cast in a negative (emergent)

role within his family. His "negativity" is attributed to
her gender, the order of her birth, religious, social, or
cultural dictates and commandments, her "character
flaws", her relation to a specific person or event, her
acts or inaction and so on.
In the words of one such IN:

"In the religious culture I grew up in, women are SO
suppressed, their roles are so carefully restricted. They
are the representation, in the flesh, of all that is sinful,
degrading, of all that is wrong with the world.
These are the negative gender/cultural images that

were force fed to us the negative 'otherness' of women,
as defined by men, was fed to me. I was so shy,
withdrawn, unable to really relate to people at all from
as early as I can remember."
The IN is subjected and exposed either to an

overbearing, overvalued parent, or to an aloof,
detached, emotionally unavailable one – or to both –
at an early stage of his life.
"I grew up in the shadow of my father who adored me,

put me on a pedestal, told me I could do or be
anything I wanted because I was incredibly bright,
BUT, he ate me alive, I was his property and an
extension of him. I also grew up with the mounting
hatred of my narcissist brother who got none of this
attention from our father and got no attention from
our mother either. My function was to make my father
look wonderful in the eyes of all outsiders, the
wonderful parent with a genius Wunderkind as his last
child, and the only child of the six that he was
physically present to raise from the get go. The
overvaluation combined with being abjectly ignored or
raged at by him when I stepped out of line even the
tiniest bit, was enough to warp my personality."
The Invert is prevented from developing full-blown

secondary narcissism. The Invert is so heavily
preoccupied in his or her pre-school years with
satisfying the narcissistic parent, that the traits of
grandiosity and self-love, even the need for Narcissistic
Supply, remain dormant or repressed.
The Invert simply "knows" that only the narcissistic

parent can provide the requisite amount of Narcissistic
Supply. The narcissistic parent is so controlling that any
attempt to garner praise or adulation from any other
source (without the approval of the parent) is severely
punished by swift devaluation and even the occasional
spanking or abuse (physical, emotional, or sexual).
This is a vital part of the conditioning that gives rise to

inverted narcissism. Where the narcissist exhibits
grandiosity, the Invert is intensely uncomfortable with
personal praise, and wishes to always divert praise away
from himself onto his narcissist. This is why the IN can
only truly feel anything when she is in a relationship
with another narcissist. The IN is conditioned and
programmed from the very beginning to be the perfect
companion to the narcissist. To feed his Ego, to be
purely his extension, to seek only praise and adulation if
it brings greater praise and adulation to her narcissist.
The Inverted Narcissist's Survival Guide
• Listen attentively to everything the narcissist

says and agree with it all.
Don't believe a word of it but let it slide as if
everything is just fine, business as usual.
• Offer something absolutely unique to the

narcissist which they cannot obtain anywhere
else.
Also be prepared to line up future Sources of
Primary NS for your narcissist because you will
not be IT for very long, if at all. If you take over
the procuring function for the narcissist, they
become that much more dependent on you
which makes it a bit tougher for them to pull
their haughty stuff – an inevitability, in any case.
• Be endlessly patient and go way out of your way

to be accommodating, thus keeping the
Narcissistic Supply flowing liberally, and
keeping the peace (relatively speaking).
• Get tremendous personal satisfaction out of

endlessly giving. This one may not be attractive
to you, but it is a take it or leave it proposition.
• Be absolutely emotionally and financially

independent of the narcissist. Take what you
need: the excitement and engulfment (i.e., NS)
and refuse to get upset or hurt when the
narcissist does or says something dumb. Yelling
back works really well but should be reserved
for special occasions when you fear your
narcissist may be on the verge of leaving you;
the silent treatment is better as an ordinary
response, but it must be devoid of emotional
content, more with the air of boredom and "I'll
talk to you later, when I am good and ready, and
when you are behaving in a more reasonable
fashion."
• If your narcissist is cerebral and not interested in

having much sex, give yourself ample
permission to have sex with other people. Your
cerebral narcissist is not indifferent to infidelity
so discretion and secrecy is of paramount
importance.
• If your narcissist is somatic and you don't mind,

join in on group sex encounters but make sure
that you choose properly for your narcissist.
They are heedless and very undiscriminating in
respect of sexual partners and that can get very
problematic (sexually Transmitted Diseases
blackmail come to mind).
• If you are a "fixer" which most Inverted

Narcissists are, focus on fixing situations,
preferably before they become "situations".
Don't for one moment delude yourself that you
can actually fix the narcissist – it simply will not
happen. Not because they are being stubborn –
they just simply can't be fixed.
• If there is any fixing that can be done, it is to

help your narcissist become aware of their
condition, and (this is very important) with no
negative implications or accusations in the
process at all.
It is like living with a physically handicapped
person and being able to discuss, calmly,
unemotionally, what the limitations and benefits
of the handicap are and how the two of you can
work with these factors, rather than trying to
change them.
• Finally, and most important of all for the

Inverted Narcissist: get to know yourself.
What are you getting from the relationship? Are
you actually a masochist?
Why is this relationship attractive and
interesting?
Define for yourself what good and beneficial
things you believe you are receiving in this
relationship. Define the things that you find
harmful to you. Develop strategies to minimise
the harm to yourself.
Don't expect that you will cognitively be able to
reason with the narcissist to change who they
are. You may have some limited success in
getting your narcissist to tone down on the really
harmful behaviours that affect you, which
emanate from the unchangeable essence of the
narcissist. This can only be accomplished in a
very trusting, frank and open relationship.
The Inverted Narcissist can have a reasonably good,

long lasting relationship with the narcissist. You must be
prepared to give your narcissist a lot of space and
leeway.
You don't really exist for them as a fully realised person

– no one does. They are not fully realised people so they
cannot possibly have the skills, no matter how smart or
sexy, to be a complete person in the sense that most
adults are complete.
Somatic versus Cerebral Inverted Narcissists (IN)
The Inverted Narcissist is really an erstwhile narcissist

internalised by the IN. Inevitably, we are likely to find
among the Inverted the same propensities, predilections,
preferences and inclinations that we do among proper
narcissists.
The cerebral IN is an IN whose source of vicarious
Primary Narcissistic Supply lies – through the medium
and mediation of a narcissist – in the exercise of his
intellectual faculties. A somatic IN would tend to make
use of his body, sex, shape or health in trying to secure
NS for "her" narcissist.
The Inverted Narcissist feeds on the primary narcissist

and this is his Narcissistic Supply. So these two
typologies can essentially become a self-supporting,
symbiotic system.
In reality though, both the narcissist and the Inverted

Narcissist need to be quite well aware of the dynamics
of this relationship in order to make it work as a
successful long-term arrangement. It might well be that
this symbiosis would only work between a cerebral
narcissist and a cerebral Invert. The somatic narcissist's
incessant sexual dalliances would be far too threatening
to the equanimity of the cerebral Invert for there to be
much chance of this succeeding, even for a short time.
It would seem that only opposing types of narcissist can

get along when two classic narcissists are involved in a
couple. It follows, syllogistically, that only identical
types of narcissist and inverted narcissist can survive in
a couple. In other words: the best, most enduring
couples of narcissist and his inverted narcissist mate
would involve a somatic narcissist and a somatic IN – or
a cerebral narcissist and a cerebral IN.
Coping with Narcissists and Non-Narcissists
The Inverted Narcissist is a person who grew up

enthralled by the narcissistic parent. This parent
engulfed and subsumed the child's being to such an
extent that the child's personality was irrevocably
shaped by this immersion, damaged beyond hope of
repair. The child was not even able to develop defence
mechanisms such as narcissism.
The end result is an Inverted Narcissistic personality.

The traits of this personality are primarily evident in the
context of romantic relationships. The child was
conditioned by the narcissistic parent to only be entitled
to feel whole, useful, happy, and productive when the
child augmented or mirrored to the parent the parent's
False Self. As a result the child is shaped by this
engulfment and cannot feel complete in any significant
adult relationship unless they are with a narcissist.
The Inverted Narcissist in Relationship with the

Narcissist
The Inverted Narcissist is drawn to significant

relationships with other narcissists in her adulthood.
These relationships are usually spousal primary
relationships but can also be friendships with narcissists
outside of the primary love relationship.
In a primary relationship, the Inverted Narcissist

attempts to re-create the parent-child relationship. The
Invert thrives on mirroring to the narcissist his own
grandiosity and in so doing the Invert obtains her own
Narcissistic Supply (which is the dependence of the
narcissist upon the Invert for their Secondary
Narcissistic Supply).
The Invert must have this form of relationship with a

narcissist in order to feel whole. The Invert goes as far
as needed to ensure that the narcissist is happy, cared
for, properly adored, as she feels is the narcissist's right.
The Invert glorifies and lionizes her narcissist, places
him on a pedestal, endures any and all narcissistic
devaluation with calm equanimity, impervious to the
overt slights of the narcissist.
Narcissistic rage is handled deftly by the Inverted

Narcissist. The Invert is exceedingly adept at managing
every aspect of her life, tightly controlling all situations,
so as to minimise the potential for the inevitable
narcissistic rages of his narcissist.
The Invert wishes to be subsumed by the narcissist. The

Invert only feels truly loved and alive in this kind of
relationship. The invert is loath to abandon her
relationships with narcissists. The relationship only ends
when the narcissist withdraws completely from the
symbiosis. Once the narcissist has determined that the
Invert is of no further use, and withholds all Narcissistic
Supply from the Invert, only then does the Invert
reluctantly move on to another relationship.
The Invert is most likely to equate sexual intimacy with

engulfment. This can be easily misread to mean that the
Invert is himself or herself a somatic narcissist, but it
would be incorrect. The Invert can endure years of
minimal sexual contact with their narcissist and still be
able to maintain the self-delusion of intimacy and
engulfment. The Invert finds a myriad of other ways to
"merge" with the narcissist, becoming intimately,
though only in support roles, involved with the
narcissist's business, career, or any other activity where
the Invert can feel that they are needed by the narcissist
and indispensable.
The Invert is an expert at doling out Narcissistic Supply
and even goes as far as procuring Primary Narcissistic
Supply for their narcissist (even where this means
finding another lover for the narcissist, or participating
in group sex with the narcissist).
Usually though, the Invert seems most attracted to the

cerebral narcissist and finds him easier to manage than
the somatic narcissist. The cerebral narcissist is
disinterested in sex and this makes life considerably
easier for the Invert, i.e., the Invert is less likely to
"lose" their cerebral narcissist to another primary
partner. A somatic narcissist may be prone to changing
partners with greater frequency or wish to have no
partner, preferring to have multiple, casual sexual
relationships of no apparent depth which never last very
long.
The Invert regards relationships with narcissists as the

only true and legitimate form of primary relationship.
The Invert is capable of having primary relationships
with non-narcissists. But without the engulfment and the
drama, the Invert feels unneeded, unwanted and
emotionally uninvolved.
When Can a Classic Narcissist Become an Inverted

Narcissist?
A classic narcissist can become an inverted narcissist in

one (or more) of the following (typically cumulative)
circumstances:
a. Immediately following a life crisis and a

narcissistic injury (divorce, devastating financial
loss, death of a parent, or a child, imprisonment,
loss of social status and, in general, any other
narcissistic injury).
b. When the injured narcissist then meets another -

classic - narcissist who restores a sense of
meaning and superiority (uniqueness) to his life.
The injured narcissist derives Narcissistic
Supply vicariously, by proxy, through the
"dominant" narcissist.
c. As part of an effort to secure a particularly

desired Source of Narcissistic Supply. The
conversion from classic to inverted narcissism
serves to foster an attachment (bonding) between
the narcissist and his source. When the narcissist
judges that the source is his and can be taken for
granted, he reverts to his former, classically
narcissistic self.
Such a "conversion" is always temporary. It does

not last and the narcissist reverts to his "default"
or dominant state.
When Can an Inverted Narcissist become a Classic

Narcissist?
The inverted narcissist can become a classic narcissist in

one (or more) of the following (typically cumulative)
circumstances:
a. Immediately following a life crisis that involves

the incapacitation or dysfunction of the inverted
narcissist's partner (sickness, accident, demotion,
divorce, devastating financial loss, death of a
parent, or a child, imprisonment, loss of social
status and, in general, any other narcissistic
injury).
b. When the inverted narcissist, injured and

disillusioned, then meets another - inverted -
narcissist who restores a sense of meaning and
superiority (uniqueness) to his life. The injured
narcissist derives Narcissistic Supply from the
inverted narcissist.
c. As part of an effort to secure a particularly

desired Source of Narcissistic Supply. The
conversion from inverted to classic narcissism
serves to foster an attachment (bonding) between
the narcissist and his source. When the narcissist
judges that the source is his and can be taken for
granted, he reverts to his former, inverted
narcissistic self.
Such a "conversion" is always temporary. It does

not last and the narcissist reverts to his "default"
or dominant state.
Relationships between the Inverted Narcissist and

Non-Narcissists
The Inverted Narcissist can maintain relationships

outside of the symbiotic primary relationship with a
narcissist. But the Invert does not "feel" loved because
she finds the non-narcissist not "engulfing" or not
"exciting". Thus, the Invert tends to devalue their non-
narcissistic primary partner as less worthy of the Inverts'
love and attention.
The Invert may be able to sustain a relationship with a
non-narcissist by finding other narcissistic symbiotic
relationships outside of this primary relationship. The
Invert may, for instance, have a narcissistic friend or
lover, to whom he pays extraordinary attention, ignoring
the real needs of the non-narcissistic partner.
Consequently, the only semi-stable primary relationship

between the Invert and the non-narcissist occurs where
the non-narcissist is very easy going, emotionally secure
and not needing much from the Invert at all by way of
time, energy or commitment to activities requiring the
involvement of both parties. In a relationship with this
kind of non-narcissist, the Invert may become a
workaholic or very involved in outside activities that
exclude the non-narcissist spouse.
It appears that the Inverted Narcissist in a relationship

with a non-narcissist is behaviourally indistinguishable
from a true narcissist. The only important exception is
that the Invert does not rage at his non-narcissist partner
– she instead withdraws from the relationship even
further. This passive-aggressive reaction has been noted,
though, with narcissists as well.
Inverted and Other Atypical / Partial (NOS)

Narcissists
Inverted Narcissists Talk about Themselves
Competition and (Pathological) Envy
"I have a dynamic that comes up with every single

person I get close to, where I feel extremely competitive
toward and envious of the other person. But I don't ACT
competitive, because at the very outset, I see myself as
the loser in the competition. I would never dream of
trying to beat the other person, because I know deep in
my heart that they would win and I would be utterly
humiliated. There are fewer things on earth that feel
worse to me than losing a contest and having the other
person gloat over me, especially if they know how much
I cared about not losing. This is one thing that I actually
feel violent about. I guess I tend to project the
grandiosity part of the NPD package onto the other
person rather than on a False Ego of my own. So most
of the time I'm stuck in a state of deep resentment and
envy toward her. To me, she's always far more
intelligent, likable, popular, talented, self-confident,
emotionally developed, morally good, and attractive
than I am. And I really hate her for that, and feel
humiliated by it. So it's incredibly hard for me to feel
happy for this person when she has a success, because
I'm overcome with humiliation about myself. This has
ruined many a close relationship. I tend to get this way
about one person at a time, usually the person who is
playing the role of 'my better half', best friends or
lovers/partners. So it's not like I'm unable to be happy
for anyone, ever, or that I envy every person I meet. I
don't get obsessed with how rich or beautiful movie
stars are or anything like that. It only gets projected onto
this partner-person, the person I'm depending on the
most in terms of supplies (attention, reassurance,
security, building up my self-esteem, etc.)…
…The really destructive thing that happens is, I see her

grandiose traits as giving her the power to have
anything and anyone she wants. So I feel a basic
insecurity, because why should she stay with a loser like
me, when she's obviously so out of my league? So
really, what I'm envious of is the power that all that
talent, social ability, beauty, etc., gives her to have
CHOICES – the choice to stay or leave me. Whereas I
am utterly dependent on her. It's this emotional
inequality that I find so humiliating."
"I agree with the inverted narcissist designation –

sometimes I've called myself a 'closet narcissist'. That is,
I've internalised the value system of grandiosity, but
have not applied the grandiose identity to myself.
I believe I SHOULD BE those grandiose things, but at

the same time, I know I'm not and I'm miserable about
it. So people don't think of me as having an inflated Ego
– and indeed I don't – but scratch the surface, and you'll
find all these inflated expectations. I mean to say that
perhaps the parents suppressed every manifestation of
grandiosity (very common in early childhood) and of
narcissism – so that the defence mechanism that
narcissism is was 'inverted' and internalised in this
unusual form."
"Maybe there aren't two discrete states (NPD vs.

'regular' low self-esteem) – maybe it's more of a
continuum. And maybe it's just the degree and depth of
the problem that distinguishes one from the other.
My therapist describes NPD as 'the inability to love

oneself'. As she defines it, the 'narcissistic wound' is a
deep wounding of the sense of self, the image of
oneself. That doesn't mean that other disorders – or for
that matter, other life stressors – can't also cause low
self-esteem. But I think NPD IS low self-esteem…
That's what the disorder is really about – an image of
yourself that is profoundly negative, and the inability to
attain a normal and healthy self-image…"
"Yes, I'm a survivor of child abuse. But remember that

not all abuse is alike. There are different kinds of abuse,
and different effects. My XXX's style of abuse had to do
with trying to annihilate me as a separate person. It also
had to do with the need to put all his negative self-
image onto me – to see in me what he hated in himself.
So I got to play the role of the loser that he secretly
feared he was. I was flipped back and forth in those
roles – sometimes I'd be a Source of NS for him, and
other times I was the receptacle of all his pain and rage.
Sometimes my successes were used to reflect back on
him, to show off to the rest of the family. Other times,
my successes were threatening to my father, who
suddenly feared that I was superior to him and had to be
squelched. I experience emotions that most people I
know don't feel. Or maybe they do feel them, but to far
less extreme intensity. For example, the envy and
comparison/competition I feel toward others. I guess
most of us have experienced rivalry, jealousy, being
compared to others. Most of us have felt envy at
another's success. Yet most people I know seem able to
overcome those feelings to some extent, to be able to
function normally. In a competition, for example, they
may be driven to do their best so they can win. For me,
the fear of losing and being humiliated is so intense that
I avoid competition completely. I am terrified of
showing people that I care about doing well, because it's
so shaming for me if I lose. So I underachieve and
pretend I don't care. Most people I know may envy
another person's good luck or success, but it doesn't
prevent them from also being happy for them and
supporting them. But for me, when I'm in a competitive
dynamic with someone, I can't hear about any of their
successes, or compliments they've received, etc. I don't
even like to see the person doing good things, like
bringing Thanksgiving leftovers to the sick old guy next
door, because those things make me feel inferior for not
thinking of doing that myself (and not having anyone in
my life that I'd do that for). It's just so incredibly painful
for me to see evidence of the other person's good
qualities, because it immediately brings up my feeling
of inferiority. I can't even stand to date someone, who
looks really good, because I'm jealous of their good
looks! So this deep and obsessive envy has destroyed
my joy in other people. All the things about other people
that I love and take pleasure in is a double-edged sword
because I also hate them for it, for having those good
qualities (while, presumably, I don't). I don't know – do
you think this is garden-variety low self-esteem? I know
plenty of people who suffer from lack of confidence,
from timidity, social awkwardness, hatred of their body,
feeling unlovable, etc. But they don't have this kind of
hostile, corrosive resentment of another person for being
all the wonderful things that they can't be, or aren't
allowed to be, etc. And one thing I hate is when people
are judgemental of me about how I feel, as though I can
help it. It's like, 'You shouldn't be so selfish, you should
feel happy for her that she's successful', etc. They don't
understand that I would love to feel those things, but I
can't. I can't stop the incredible pain that explodes in me
when these feelings get triggered, and I often can't even
HIDE the feelings. It's just so overwhelming. I feel so
damaged sometimes. There's more, but that's the crux of
it for me, anyway."
Getting Compliments
"I love getting compliments and rewards, and do not
react negatively to them. In some moods, when my self-
hate has gotten triggered, I can sometimes get to places
where I'm inconsolable, because I get stuck in bitterness
and self-pity, and so I doubt the sincerity or the
reliability of the good thing that someone is saying to
me (to try to cheer me up or whatever). But, if I'm in a
reasonable mood and someone offers me something
good, I'm all too happy to accept it! I don't have a stake
in staying miserable."
The Partiality of the Condition
"I do agree that it's (atypical or inverted narcissism) not

MILDER. But how I see it is that it's PARTIAL. The
part that's there is just as destructive as it is in the
typical narcissist. But there are parts missing from that
total, full-blown disorder – and I see that as healthy,
actually. I see it as parts of myself that WEREN'T
infected by the pathology, that are still intact.
In my case, I did not develop the overweening Ego part

of the disorder. So in a sense, what you have with me is
the naked pathology, with no covering: no suaveness, no
charm, no charisma, no confidence, no persuasiveness,
but also no excuses, no lies, no justifications for my
feelings. Just the ugly self-hate, for all to see. And the
self-hate part is just as bad as it is with a full-blown
narcissist, so again, it's not milder.
But because I don't have the denial part of the disorder, I

have a lot more insight, a lot more motivation to do
something about my problems (i.e., I 'self-refer' to
therapy), and therefore, I think, a lot more hope of
getting better than people whose defence involves
totally denying they even have a problem."
"When my full-blown XXX's pathological envy would

get triggered, he would respond by putting down the
person he was envious of – or by putting down the
accomplishment itself, or whatever good stuff the other
person had. He'd trivialise it, or outright contradict it, or
find some way to convince the other person (often me)
that the thing they're feeling good about isn't real, or
isn't worthwhile, or is somehow bad, etc. He could do
this because the inflated Ego defence was fully formed
and operating with him.
When MY pathological envy gets triggered, I will be

bluntly honest about it. I'll say something self-pitying,
such as: 'You always get the good stuff, and I get
nothing'; 'You're so much better than I'; 'People like you
better – you have good social skills and I'm a jerk'; and
so on. Or I might even get hostile and sarcastic: 'Well, it
must be nice to have so many people worshipping you,
isn't it?' I don't try to convince myself that the other
person's success isn't real or worthwhile, etc. Instead,
I'm totally flooded with the pain of feeling utterly
inferior and worthless – and there's no way for me to
convince myself or anyone else otherwise. I'm not
saying that the things I say are pleasant to hear – and it
is still manipulative of me to say them, because the
other person's attention is drawn away from their joy
and onto my pain and hostility. And instead of doubting
their success's worth or reality, they feel guilty about it,
or about talking about it, because it hurts me so much.
So from the other person's point of view, maybe it's not
any easier to live with a partial narcissist than with a
full-blown, in that their joys and successes lead to pain
in both cases. It's certainly not easier for me, being
flooded with rage and pain instead of being able to hide
behind a delusion of grandeur. But from my therapist's
point of view, I'm much better off because I know I'm
unhappy – it's in my face all the time. So I'm motivated
to work on it and change it. And time has borne her
words out. Over the past several years that I've worked
on this issue, I have changed a great deal in how I deal
with it. Now when the envy gets triggered, I don't feel
so entwined with the other person – I recognise that it's
my OWN pain getting triggered, not something they are
doing to me. And so I can acknowledge the pain in a
more responsible way, taking ownership of it by saying,
'The jealousy feelings are getting triggered again, and
I'm feeling worthless and inferior. Can you reassure me
that I'm not?' That's a lot better than making some snide,
hostile, or self-pitying comment that puts the other
person on the defensive or makes them feel guilty… I
do prefer the term 'partial' because that's what it feels
like to me. It's like a building that's partially built – the
house of narcissism. For me, the structure is there, but
not the outside, so you can see inside the skeleton to all
the junk that's inside. It's the same junk that's inside a
full-blown narcissist, but their building is completed, so
you can't see inside. Their building is a fortress, and it's
almost impossible to bring it down. My defences aren't
as strong … which makes my life more difficult in some
ways because I REALLY feel my pain. But it also
means that the house can be brought down more easily,
and the junk inside cleaned out…"
Thinking about the Past and the World
"I don't usually get rageful about the past. I feel sort of
emotionally cut-off from the past, actually. I remember
events very clearly, but usually can't remember the
feelings. When I do remember the feelings, my reaction
is usually one of sadness, and sometimes of relief that I
can get back in touch with my past. But not rage. All my
rage seems to get displaced on the current people in my
life."
"…When I see someone being really socially awkward

and geeky, passive-aggressive, indirect and victim-like,
it does trigger anger in me because I identify with that
person and I don't want to. I try to put my negative
feelings onto them, to see that person as the jerk, not me
– that's what a narcissist does, after all. But for me it
doesn't completely work because I know, consciously,
what I'm trying to do. And ultimately, I'm not kidding
anyone, least of all myself."
Self-Pity and Depression
"More self-pity and depression here – not so much rage.

One of the things that triggers my rage more than
anything else is the inability to control another person,
the inability to dominate them and force my reality on
them. I feel impotent, humiliated, forced back on my
empty self. Part of what I'm feeling here is envy: that
person who can't be controlled clearly has a self and I
don't, and I just hate them for it. But it's also a power
struggle – I want to get Narcissistic Supply by being in
control and on top and having the other person
submissive and compliant…"
Regretting, Admitting Mistakes
"I regret my behaviour horribly, and I DO admit my

feelings. I am also able, in the aftermath, to have
empathy for the feelings of the person I've hurt, and I'm
horribly sad about it, and ashamed of myself. It's as
though I'd been possessed by a demon, acted out all this
abusive horrible stuff, and then, after the departure of
the demon, I'm back in my right mind and it's like,
'What have I DONE???' I don't mean I'm not
responsible for what I did (i.e., a demon made me do it).
But when I'm triggered, I have no empathy – I can only
see my projection onto that person, as a huge threat to
me, someone who must be demolished. But when my
head clears, I see that person's pain, hurt, fear – and I
feel terrible. I want to make it up to them. And that
feeling is totally sincere – it's not an act. I'm genuinely
sorry for the pain I've caused the other person."
Rage
"I wouldn't say that my rage comes from repressed self-

contempt (mine is not repressed – I'm totally aware of
it). And it's not missing atonement either, since I do
atone. The rage comes from feeling humiliated, from
feeling that the other person has somehow sadistically
and gleefully made me feel inferior, that they're getting
off on being superior, that they're mocking me and
ridiculing me, that they have scorn and contempt for me
and find it all very amusing. That – whether real or
imagined (usually imagined) – is what causes my rage."
Pursuing Relationships with Narcissists
"There are some very few of us who actually seek out

relationships with narcissists. We do this with the full
knowledge that we are not wanted, despised even. We
persist and pursue no matter the consequences, no
matter the cost.
I am an 'inverted narcissist'. It is because as a child I
was 'imprinted/fixated' with a particular pattern
involving relationships. I was engulfed so completely by
my father's personality and repressed so severely by
various other factors in my childhood that I simply
didn't develop a recognisable personality. I existed
purely as an extension of my father. I was his genius
Wunderkind. He ignored my mother and poured all his
energy and effort into me. I did not develop full-blown
secondary narcissism… I developed into the perfect
'other half' of the narcissists moulding me. I became the
perfect, eager co-dependent. And this is an imprint, a
pattern in my psyche, a way of (not) relating to the
world of relationships by only being able to truly relate
to one person (my father) and then one kind of person –
the narcissist.
He is my perfect lover, my perfect mate, a fit that is so

slick and smooth, so comfortable and effortless, so filled
with meaning and actual feelings – that's the other thing.
I cannot feel on my own. I am incomplete. I can only
feel when I am engulfed by another (first it was my
father) and now – well now it has to be a narcissist. Not
just any narcissist either. He must be exceedingly smart,
good looking, have adequate reproductive equipment
and some knowledge on how to use it and that's about it.
When I am engulfed by someone like this I feel

completed, I can actually FEEL. I am whole again. I
function as a sibyl, an oracle, an extension of the
narcissist. His fiercest protector, his purveyor/procurer
of NS, the secretary, organiser, manager, etc. I think you
get the picture and this gives me INTENSE
PLEASURE.
So the answer to your question: 'Why would anyone
want to be with someone who doesn't want them back?'
The short answer is, 'Because there is no one else
remotely worth looking at.'"
Making Amends
"I mostly apologise, and I give the person space to talk

about what hurt them so that (1) they get to express their
anger or hurt to me, and (2) I can understand better and
know better how not to hurt them (if I can avoid it) the
next time there's a conflict. Sometimes the hurt I cause
is unintentional – maybe I've been insensitive or
forgetful or something, in which case I feel more certain
that I can avoid repeating the hurtful behaviour, since I
didn't want to hurt them in the first place. If the hurt I
caused has to do with my getting my trigger pulled and
going into a rage, then that hurt was quite deliberate,
although at the time I was unable to experience the other
person as vulnerable or capable of being hurt by me.
And I do realise that if that trigger is pulled again, it
might happen again. But I also hope that there'll be a
LITTLE TINY window where the memory of the
conversation will come back to me while I'm in my
rage, and I'll remember that the person really IS
vulnerable. I hope that by hearing over and over that the
person actually does feel hurt by what I say while in
rages, that I might remember that when I am triggered
and raging. So, mostly I apologise and try to
communicate with the other person. I don't verbally
self-flagellate, because that's manipulative. Not to say I
never do that – in fact I've had a dynamic with people
where I verbally put myself down and try to engage the
other person into arguing me out of it.
But if I'm in the middle of apologising to the other
person for hurting them, then I feel like this is their
moment, and I don't want to turn the focus toward
getting them to try to make me feel better. I will talk
about myself, but only in an attempt to communicate, so
that we can understand each other better. I might say, 'I
got triggered about such-and-such, and you seemed so
invulnerable that it enraged me', etc. – and the other
person might react with, 'But I was feeling vulnerable, I
just couldn't show it', etc. – and we'll go back and forth
like that. So it's not like I don't think my feelings count,
and I do want the other person to UNDERSTAND my
feelings, but I don't want to put the other person in the
role of taking care of my feelings in that moment,
because they have just been hurt by me and I'm trying to
make it up to them, not squeeze more stuff OUT of
them…"
"So when I've been a real jerk to someone, I want them

to feel like it's OK to be pissed off at me, and I want
them to know that I am interested in and focused on
how they feel, not just on how I feel. As for gifts – I
used to do that, but eventually I came to feel that that
was manipulative, too, that it muddled things because
then the other person would feel like they couldn't be
angry anymore, since after all, I've just brought them
this nice gift. I also feel that in general, gift-giving is a
sweet and tender thing to do, and I don't want to sully
that tenderness by associating it with the hurt that comes
from abusive behaviour."
Why Narcissists?
"I am BUILT this way. I may have overstated it by

saying that I have 'no choice' because, in fact I do.
The choice is – live in an emotionally deadened
monochrome world where I can reasonably interact with
normal people OR I can choose to be with a narcissist in
which case my world is Technicolor, emotionally
satisfying, alive and wondrous (also can be turbulent
and a real roller coaster ride for the unprepared, not to
mention incredibly damaging for people who are not
inverted narcissists and who fall into relationships with
narcissists). As I have walked on both sides of the street,
and because I have developed coping mechanisms that
protect me really quite well, I can reasonably safely
engage in a primary, intimate relationship with a
narcissist without getting hurt by it.
The real WHY of it all is that I learned, as a young

child, that being 'eaten alive' by a narcissist parent, to
the point where your existence is but an extension of his
own, was how all relationships ought to work. It is a
psychological imprint – my 'love map', it is what feels
right to me intrinsically. A pattern of living – I don't
know how else to describe it so you and others will
understand how very natural and normal this is for me.
It is not the torturous existence that most of the
survivors of narcissism are recounting on this list.
My experiences with narcissists, to me, ARE NORMAL

for me. Comfortable like an old pair of slippers that fit
perfectly. I don't expect many people to attempt to do
this, to 'make themselves into' this kind of person. I
don't think anyone could, if they tried.
It is my need to be engulfed and merged that drives me

to these relationships and when I get those needs met I
feel more normal, better about myself. I am the outer
extension of the narcissist. In many ways I am a
vanguard, a public two-way warning system, fiercely
defending my narcissist from harm, and fiercely loyal to
him, catering to his every need in order to protect his
fragile existence. These are the dynamics of my
particular version of engulfment. I don't need anyone to
take care of me. I need only to be needed in this very
particular way, by a narcissist who inevitably possesses
the ability to engulf in a way that normal, fully realised
adults cannot. It is somewhat paradoxical – I feel freer
and more independent with a narcissist than without
one. I achieve more in my life when I am in this form of
relationship. I try harder, work harder, am more
creative, think better of myself, excel in most every
aspect of my life."
"…I go ahead and cater to him and pretend that his

words don't hurt, and later, I engage in an internal fight
with myself for being so damned submissive. It's a
constant battle and I can't seem to decide which voice in
my head I should listen to… I feel like a fool, yet, I
would rather be a fool with him than a lonely, well-
rounded woman without him. I've often said that the
only way that we can stay together is because we feed
off of each other. I give him everything he needs and he
takes it. Seeing him happy and pleased is what gives me
pleasure. I feel very successful then."
Partial NPD
"I do think it's uncommon for girls to develop these

patterns, as they are usually trained to be self-effacing. I
certainly was! However, I have a lot of the very same
underlying patterns that full-blown, obnoxiously
egotistical NP's have, but I am not egotistical because I
didn't develop the pattern of inflated Ego and
grandiosity. All the rest of it is there, though: fragile
Ego, lack of a centre or self, super-sensitive to criticism
and rejections, pathological, obsessive envy,
comparisons and competitive attitudes toward others, a
belief that everyone in the world is either superior or
inferior to me, and so on.
Sometimes I kind of wish I had developed the inflated

Ego of a complete NP, because then I would at least be
able to hide from all the pain I feel. But at the same
time, I'm glad I didn't, because those people have a
much lower chance of recovery – how can they recover
if they don't acknowledge anything is wrong? Whereas
it's pretty clear to me I have problems, and I've spent my
life working on them and trying to change myself and
heal."
Narcissist-Non Narcissist and Narcissist-Inverted

Narcissist Couples
"Can a N and a non-N ever maintain a long lasting

marriage? It would seem that a non-N would have too
much self-esteem to lend himself to a lifetime of
catering and pandering to an N's unending need for
unearned adoration and glory. I, as a non-N… got tired
of these people and their unremitting attempts to drain
my psyche within a relatively short period of time and
abandoned them as soon as I realised what I was dealing
with to preserve my own sanity."
"It depends on the non-narcissist, really. Narcissism is a

RIGID, systemic pattern of responses. It is so all-
pervasive and all-encompassing that it is a
PERSONALITY disorder. If the non-narcissist is
codependent, for instance, then the narcissist is a perfect
match for him and the union will last…"
"You have to pimp for the narcissist, intellectually, and

sexually. If your narcissist is somatic, you are much
better off lining up the sex partners than leaving it to
him. Intellectual pimping is more varied. You can think
of wonderful things and then subtly string out the idea,
in the most delicate of packages and watch the narcissist
cogitate their way to 'their' brilliant discovery whilst you
bask in the glow of their perfection and success… The
point of this entire exercise is to assure YOUR supply,
which is the narcissist himself, not to punish yourself by
giving away a great idea or abase yourself because, of
course, YOU are not worthy of having such a great idea
on your own – but who knows, it may seem that way to
the inverted narcissist. It really depends on how self-
aware the inverted is."
"The only rejection you need to fear is the possibility of

losing the narcissist and if one is doing everything else
right, this is very unlikely to happen! So by 'emotionally
independent' I am talking about being self-assured,
doing your own thing, having a life, feeling strong and
good about yourself, getting emotional sustenance from
other people. I mean, let's face it, a drug is a drug is a
habit. Habits just are, and what they ARE NOT are the
be all and end all of love, commitment and serene
symmetrical, balanced emotional perfection that is the
ideal of the romanticised 'love-for-a-lifetime' all-
American relationship dream."
"(I am) terribly turned on by narcissists. The most

exciting moments of my life in every venue have been
with narcissists. It is as if living and loving with normal
people is a grey thing by comparison, not fuelled by
sufficient adrenaline. I feel like a junkie, now, that I no
longer permit myself the giddy pleasure of the RUSH I
used to know when I was deeply and hopelessly
involved with an N. I am like a lotus-eater. And I always
felt guilty about this and also sorry that I ever
succumbed that first time to my first narcissist lover."
"I am exactly this way and I feel exactly as you do, that
the world is a sepia motion picture but when I am
intimately involved with a narcissist, it breaks out into
three-dimensional Technicolor and I can see and feel in
ways that are not available to me otherwise. In my case
I developed this (inverted narcissism) as a result of
being the favourite of my father who so completely
absorbed me into his personality that I was not able to
develop a sense of separation. So I am stuck in this
personality matrix of needing to be engulfed, adored by
and completely taken over by a narcissist in my life. In
turn, I worship, defend, regulate and procure
Narcissistic Supply for my narcissist. It is like the
mould and the moulded."
"In my case, I realise that while I can't stop loving my

current narcissist, it isn't necessary for me to avoid as
long as I can understand. In my way of looking at it, he
is deserving of love, and since I can give him love
without it hurting me, then as long as he needs it, he
shall have it."
"My personal theory is that dogmatic religious culture is

a retarding influence on the growth and maturation of
those heavily involved – more and more autonomy (and
hence personal responsibility) seems to be blithely
sacrificed to the group mind/spirit. It is as though the
church members become one personality and that
personality is narcissistic and the individual just folds
under the weight of that kind of group pressure –
particularly if you are a child."
"If I displayed behaviour that made my XXX look good

to others, I was insipidly overvalued. When I dared be
something other than who she wanted me to be, the
sarcastic criticism and total devaluation was
unbelievable. So, I learned to be all things to all people.
I get a heavenly high from surrendering my power to a
narcissist, to catering to them, in having them overvalue
and need me, and it is the only time that I truly feel
alive…"
"We have very little choice in all of this. We are as

vacant and warped as the narcissist. XXX is wont to say,
'I don't HAVE a personality disorder, I AM a personality
disorder.' It defines who we are and how we will
respond. You will always and ONLY have real feelings
when you are with a narcissist. It is your love map, it is
the programming within your psyche. Does it need to
control your behaviour? Not necessarily. Knowing what
you are can at least give you the opportunity to forecast
the effect of an action before you take it. So, loveless
black and white may be the very healthiest thing for you
for the foreseeable future. I tend to think of these
episodes with narcissists as being cyclic. You will likely
need to cut loose for a while when your child is older.
DO NOT feel ashamed please! Should a physically

handicapped person feel ashamed of their handicap? No
and neither should we. The trouble with us is that we are
fooled into thinking that these relationships are 'guilty
pleasures'. They feel so very good for a time but they
are more akin to addiction satisfaction rather than being
the 'right match' or an 'appropriate relationship'. I am
still very conflicted myself about this. I wrote a few
months ago that it was like having a caged very
dangerous animal inside of me. When I get near
narcissists, the animal smells its own kind and it wants
out. I very carefully 'micro-manage' my life. This means
that I daily do fairly regular reality checks and keep a
very tight reign on my self and my behaviours. I am also
obsessive-compulsive."
"I feel as though I'm constantly on an emotional roller

coaster. I may wake up in a good mood, but if my N
partner does or says something, which is hurtful to me,
my mood changes immediately. I now feel sad, empty,
afraid. All I want to do at this point is anything that will
make him say something NICE to me.
Once he does, I'm back on top of the world. This pattern

of mood changes, or whatever you may call them, can
take place several times a day. Each and every day. I've
gotten to the point where I'm not sure that I can trust
myself to feel any one way, because I know that I have
no control over myself. He has the control. It's scary, yet
I've sort of come to depend on him determining how I
am going to feel."
"When I was first involved with my cerebral narcissist I

was like this but after awhile I just learned to become
more emotionally distant (the ups and downs were just
too much) and find emotional gratification with other
people, mostly girl friends and one of two male friends.
I make a point of saying … that the invert must be or
become emotionally and financially independent (if you
don't do this he will eat you up and when he has finished
with you and you are nothing but a husk, you will be
expelled from his life in one big vomit). It is really
important for you to start to take responsibility for your
own emotional wellness without regard to how he treats
you. Remember that the narcissist has the emotional
maturity of a two-year old! Don't expect much in the
way of emotional depth or support in your relationship –
he simply is not capable of anything that sophisticated."
Also Read
Codependence, Counterdependence and Dependent

Personality Disorder
Narcissistic Parents
Narcissists and Women
The Narcissist's Mother
The Narcissistic Couple
The Adrenaline Junkie
The Misanthropic Altruist
The Pathological Charmer
The Compulsive Giver
The Narcissistic Mini-Cycle
The Narcissist and His Family

Transformations of Aggression
Narcissism, Love and Healing
The Compulsive Acts of a Narcissist
Narcissistic Personality Disorder at a Glance
Narcissists, Inverted Narcissists and Schizoids
Self Defeating and Self Destructive Behaviours
Pathological Narcissism - A Dysfunction or a

Blessing?
Return
Torture
Abuse
Trauma
In Fiction and Poetry

Nothing is Happening at Home
Mother tells me not to say anything at school about

what is happening at home. Nothing is happening at
home. Come morning, I wake up from my restless sleep
and either I wetted my bed or I didn't. If I did, mother
silently packs off my soaked pajamas and the damp
sheets, casting a harsh glance at the black stain that
seeps into the bed's upholstery. The house already reeks
and she opens the shutters and lays the linen on the
window panes, half out and the dry half in.
I get dressed and brush my teeth. I stare at my feet that

are the shape of irons and conceal them, standing on one
naked foot and then another, enthralled by their
curvaceous obesity. The white paste and my saliva swirl
in my mouth and drip on my undershirt in odoriferous
stripes. I have bad breath but I don't know it yet. Nir
will tell me and then I will. I frown and pull the polluted
garment away, as though I could undress horizontally
instead of vertically, hands stretched upwards. It turns
dark for a moment and scary so I scream. And this is
how I earn today's first slap. Mother dumps the soiled
underthings in the gaping laundry pale. Her eyes are
desperate. I am not a successful kid. I am ugly and
immature and I have an eggplant nose ("berengena" in
Ladino). I rub my hurting cheek and put on the sky blue
school uniform shirt and trousers. I don't know how to
tie my shoelaces. Instead of slender butterflies I get
knotted caterpillars, bound larva, repulsive insects with
two plastic tipped antennas. My mother is taking care of
my small sister. I wait patiently. She sighs and places
the baby on the bed. She steps towards me and I recoil
because I don't know how mad I made her. I am not sure
what it's going to be this time. Sometimes she just
groans and ties the laces with one incisive motion but at
other times she pinches me real hard and we are both
mum and my blood streams down to her nip until the
place acquires shades of black, and blue and deep
purple. She doesn't have to tell me to roll down my
sleeves. I do it. The dirty laundry of this family stays at
home. Our secrets are ours and no one else's. Sometimes
I imagine us like a fortress and the enemy would kill to
learn all kinds of things about us but we are not going to
let it, no way. We will protect each other and we will
hold them back.
On the days that mother washes the house, I withdraw

to a corner and I imagine a mighty army, shooting
arrows from all kinds of cracks and casements and I see
a hero and he is fighting empty-handed in a variety of
martial arts and he wins. Cooped up in an angle, the
dirty water churning around me, rivulets of our
effluence, revolting strands of hair and nail clippings.
Then she spreads a tattered blanket in the tiny balcony
and turns on the radio and we listen to the Program for
the Mother and Child, Listen now you lovely kids, our
program is complete and she brings me a big bowl of
fruits and I eat them and feed my sister, too.
When the shoelaces business is over, I turn my back to

her and await the heft of my schoolbag and I exit
without saying goodbye or so long or anything. She
yells after me to be careful how I cross the street, there
are cars, and to be wary of children, don't let them beat
you. Once, a stranger lifted me on his shoulders and
asked me to read aloud the names on the mailboxes. We
went through many buildings, him and me. He told me
that he was looking for some family. When I returned
home, they shouted at me something awful and warned
me not to associate with strangers because they are
dangerous, this is a fortress and we are in it. Even our
extended family don't visit. Mother and father don't like
it when they do. They set a table with all kinds of
alcoholic drinks and non-alcoholic beverages that we,
the children are allowed to consume but mother's eyes
follow everyone to see if they have touched anything
and she doesn't like at all the mess they make, these
guests.
I don't pee at school because the urinals are not clean or

something. I don't remember why, I just know not to
pee. Mother tells me not to hold back, it isn't healthy but
I abstain on purpose. I want to pee at home. When I
come back, mother doesn't let me visit the restroom to
get sorted out. That's how we call it, "sorted out". It's a
word the teacher Mina taught us, she said that it is not
nice to pee, better to get sorted out. Mother adores this
word and it became compulsory, because we are not
allowed to use foul language. So I ask permission to get
sorted out and mother takes a broom to me and beats me
forcefully on the back and all the neighbors stand at the
entrance door and watch and I pee on myself and on the
floor is this large yellow puddle in which I stand.
Mummy's broom gets all wet and the neighbors laugh
and mother sends me away to change my clothes,
perhaps now I will learn not to hold back at school. She
takes down my trousers and I am exposed to the jeering
crowd, drenched and naked. It isn't a good day, this one.
I read all evening and I read at night and I read during
the morning. I read a lot throughout this not so good
day.
Mother could have been a famous author or an

important actress but instead she had us and did not
become one. She became a housewife. There is a lot of
sadness and a lot of anger when she tells us that and also
how once she appeared in a play as Pook the naughty
dwarf and everyone complimented her and urged her to
join a professional troupe. She couldn't do it because she
was working in a shoe store on Mount Carmel to
support her father and her mother who didn't love her at
all because she was boyish. She wore her hair like a boy
and dressed like a boy and was as daring as a boy and
she gulped huge quantities of salty soup and three
loaves of bread when she came back from work at the
shop owned by the Yekkes (German-Jews) whom she
admired. When I was born, the radio broadcast the
proceedings of the Eichmann trial and she called me
"My Little Eichmann" but that was only in jest. These
Yekkes with their order and efficiency and table
manners and how she studied German and they all
admired her in return. And now this: a wailing baby and
the dripping bed sheets of her first born (you are not a
child anymore!) already six years old and must grow up
and her fingernails gouging my veins on the inside of
my arm and all my blood rushing towards her and
staining and she stares down at her hand, a glimmer in
her eyes wide open and I slowly extract my arm from
her grasp and she does not resist it. She just sighs and
brings some stinging violet iodine and smears it on the
lacerations. After some time they scar and all that
remain are pale and elongated mother traces.
So now I am reading and am in all my imaginary
kingdoms and writing horror poems that mother finds
and stashes on a towering cupboard to make me stop it
because it's sick and she doesn't want to see it again.
She tears the books I borrow from the public library and
flings them out of the concrete bars that frame our
laundry room where we also dine on a tiny wooden
table. Through these bars she tears my realms apart and
down to the shriveling grass and I leave everything and
gallop downstairs because I am afraid that by the time I
get to my shredded books someone will abscond with
them or the wind will scatter them or the rain. I find
them prostrate and wounded and I salve them with my
spit to heal them like mother's purple iodine. I think that
maybe my saliva will glue them back thick as it is but
they remain the same, only now their torn pages are also
damp. Back at home father and I sellotape the ruptured
leaves and when I go to the library, I say all kinds of lies
or put on an innocent face so that the librarian Shula
will not flip through it and see our shoddy handicraft,
my father's and my own, even tough he has golden
hands and fixes everything at home. But I keep reading,
sometimes five whole books a day. I am completely
uninterested in their content. I don't read even one of
them to its end, skip numerous paragraphs, don't even
finish thrillers or mysteries. Just scan the pages, dimly
aware of the words and father says to mother when she
curses me under her breath, what do you want from him,
you don't understand him at all and who can, he doesn't
belong to us, he is from another planet. I weep when I
hear these words, my silent tears, not the cries I give out
when I am beaten and not the self-indulgent whimpering
and see how ugly you are when you are like that. No,
this is a true release between me and my pillow and I
feel then how poor they are and how much I should pity
them and not the other way around, because I am not
from this world and I don't belong and they have to raise
me all the same. Even though they are proud of me
because I am a star pupil and give the keynote addresses
in all the school and municipal events and declare open
and closed all the ceremonies and from a tender age I
had the voice of s radio announcer and am a prodigy
with a bright future. Mother herself tells me that when
we sit around the table and she looks my age she is so
young and with a boyish haircut and pink, taut skin on
her high cheekbones. She says that she is proud of me
but not to let it go to my head, but there is a change in
her attitude towards me, like a new fear, like I am out of
the fortress now, unpredictable, from another world and
don't belong.
She used to tell us about Gamliel the Sage and his

adventures that always had an object lesson with his
scrawny and miserable goat and his stupid neighbors
that he always tricked and we would beg, mother
mother, more and she graciously consented and those
were afternoons of magic and I felt no need to read,
only to listen to the stories of the Sage and his donkey
and his son and his goat and to sip from that sweetened
peach-flavored drink she made us.
But then she would say enough and ask who touched the
refrigerator and we would say not we but she knew. She
always pointed at us and said that we had touched the
refrigerator and we know we mustn't and how her life is
being ruined by the need to clean after us and then the
beatings, the beatings. All our body.
In the middle of the apartment we have a floor-to-

ceiling metal divider. Father welded it together from
metal leaves and metal vines and stuck a small
aquarium full of teeny fish and water and a plastic diver
that gives off bubbles and all kinds of shells and fine
ground sand. Every morning, father gets up and spreads
smelly aquarium food with callused fingers over the
bubble-troubled water, rusty flakes that sink like
feathers straight into the gaping jaws of the frenetic
fishes. Every week one of them would remain stuck at
the bottom or float and the others would snap at it and
we know it is dead and it is bloated too. At night, I sleep
across from this divider, on the side that mother forbids
to enter during the day and the flickering light emitted
by the electric all souls candle illuminates the diver and
the inky water and his loneliness and the bubbles and
everything and I watch it all until I fall asleep. Come
morning, the room beyond the divider is off-limits, only
mother is scrubbing and carefully dusting the nightly
build-up off the expensive Formica furniture. I am the
only one who sleeps there at night, facing the television
set. Even guests are asked to watch this black-and-white
wonder from the outside. Until my bedtime, I sit
overlooking them all but don't take my socks off not to
show my feet like irons and I hope not to wet the sheets
in front of everyone, anything but that. Mother passes
cookies to old Monsieur Yossef from Turkey who talks
incessantly. And so I doze off amidst the sounds of the
TV and of Monsieur Yossef. I have bad dreams and
listen to mother and father arguing I will pack my
suitcases and leave you all tomorrow, feel free, mother
says, feel free to go. Tomorrow he doesn't. He gets up at
the middle of the night to go to work and before he
departs he straightens our blankets and I think that
maybe he kisses my cheek or forehead somehow,
otherwise how did his stubble scrape me it must have
been a kiss.
The next day father brings me books from the library of
the Union of Construction Workers in Haifa that I never
visit. I do go with him to attend lectures at the Union
and I ask the lecturers smart questions and everyone is
amazed and so is dad. He inflates the way he always
does when he is proud of me. Now in the book he
brought me there is a story about a king and clothes and
a kid who has the guts to cry even though it is the
monarch and everything: "The King is Naked". I read it
a couple of times like I don't believe that some kid will
shout such a thing about the king and what happened to
him afterwards, surely he was scratched and pinched at
least to death. I contemplate his iron-like feet, petite and
rosy when he ascends to the gallows and how his head
rolls sprinkling gore all over the crowd but everything is
frozen and no one cheers like in the movies about the
French revolution. Everyone gapes at this kid's lips
through which he said that the King is Naked. There is
something empowering and hopeful in this, as though a
goodhearted old fellow with long hair bends over me
because he notices that I am small and that I am
bleeding profusely from my arms and he gives me this
magic spell, this faith.
I open my eyes and I see that mother has a kerchief on

her head, like she always wears when she is dusting.
She notices my stare but she sings boisterously and I
know that I am unnerving her by watching her do her
chores. I know that soon she will mete out what a child
like me deserves.
Return
Night Terror
1. The Doctor
He inserts the syringe into my jugular and draws blood,

spurting into the cylindrical container. Securely seated
on my chest, he then makes precise incisions around my
eyelids and attempts to extract my eyeballs in one swift
motion. I can see his round face, crooked teeth, and
shiny black eyes, perched under bushy eyebrows. A tiny
muscle flutters above his clenched jaw. His doctor's
white robe flaps as he bestrides me and pins down my
unthrashing arms.
There is only the stench of sweat and the muffled

inhalations of tortured lungs. Mine. In my ears a
drumbeat and a faraway shriek, like a seagull being
butchered in mid-flight. My brain gives orders to
phantom organs. I see them from the corners of my
bloodshot eyes: my arms, my legs, like beached whales,
bluish, gelatinous, and useless.
I scream.
I strike at him but he evades my thrust and recedes into

the murky background. I won't give chase. The doors
and windows are locked, alarm systems everywhere. He
stands no chance. He turns to vapor and materializes
next to me in bed, clad in his robe, eyes shut, a
contented smile on his face.
This is my only chance.

I turn to my side, relieved that motility is restored. I
grab his slender neck. I feel his pulse: it's fast and
irregular. I squeeze. He grunts. And harder. He clasps
my forearms and mewls. Something's not right. The
doctor never whimpers. Every night, as he peels the skin
off my face with delicacy and care, he makes no sound,
except belabored breathing. When he extracts tooth after
nail, castrates me time and again, injects detergents into
my crumbling veins, he does so inaudibly and expertly.
I hesitate.
"Max!"
Her voice.
"Max! Wake up!"
I can't wake up as I am not asleep. The doctor's there, in

our bed, a danger to us both. I must exterminate him
finally.
"Max! You are having another nightmare! Please, you

are hurting me!"
The doctor's head turns around full circle and at the

back of his flattened skull there is the face of Sarah, my
lover and my friend.
I recoil. I let go. My heart threatens to break through rib

and skin, its thrumming in my ears, my brain, my eye
sockets, my violated jugular.
I sleep.
2. Sarah
Her bags are packed, my scarlet fingerprints blemish the

whiteness of her skin, she is crying. I reach for her but
she retreats in horror, nostrils flared, eyes moist, a
nervous tic above her clenched jaw.
"I am afraid of you." - She says, voice flat.
"I didn't mean to." - I feebly protest and she shrugs:

"Yesterday, I thought I'd die."
Her hand shoots to her neck involuntarily, caressing the

sore bruises, where I attempted to strangle her at night.
"It's him, you know, the doctor."
She shudders.
"I saw him yesterday again; manicured, besuited,

coiffed, as elegant as ever. He was injecting me with
something that burned, it was not phenol, I would have
died. It was something else."
"It's over." - Says Sarah, her eyes downcast, she sounds

unconvinced.
"He's still alive." - I reason - "They haven't caught him,

you know. They say he is in Argentina."
"Wherever he may be, there's nothing he can do to you."

She steps forward, palm extended towards my cheek,
and then thinks better of it, picks up her tattered suitcase
and leaves.
3. Again, the Doctor
A rigid plastic pipe, through the large vein in my leg,

towards my ovaries. I am a woman. I am to be
sterilized. The doctor crouches at the foot of my bed,
inspecting with mounting interest my private parts.
There is a greenish liquid in a giant plunger connected

to an IV stand. He nods with satisfaction. He brandishes
a glinting surgical knife and slices my abdomen. He
takes out a squarish organ mired in gory slime, my
womb, and inspects it thoroughly.
There's blood everywhere. I can see my intestines curled

in the cavity, wrapped tight in an opaque and pulsating
sheet. Two ribs are visible and underneath them, my
oversized heart. My breathing sears.
I chose tonight to be a woman. I want him to be at ease,

not on the alert. I want him to be immersed in
rearranging my organs, tearing them apart, sowing them
back reversed. I want him to forget himself in the
sandbox that is my body.
He leans over me, to study whether my left breast is

lactating.
It is not.
I reach for the hypodermic and detach it in one swift

motion.
I stick it in his jugular.
I press the plunger.

The doctor gurgles.
He whimpers and mewls.
He watches me intently as his senses dull and his body

grows limp.
There is blood everywhere. The doctor drowns in it, my

blood and his, a forbidden mixture.
4. The Police
"Was he a medical doctor?"
"Not that I am aware of."
The burly policeman scrawled in his threadbare pad.

The psychiatrist shifted in her overstuffed armchair:
"Why are you asking?"
She was a scrawny, bleached blonde and wore high

heels and a plate-sized pendant to work. The cop sighed
and slid a crime scene photograph across the burrowed
surface of the desk.
"It's tough viewing. I hope you didn't have breakfast." -

He quipped.
She covered her mouth with a dainty, wrinkled hand as

she absorbed the details.
"I can explain that." - She literally threw the photo back
at her interlocutor.
He grimaced: "Go ahead, then."
"My patient is wearing the white doctor's robe because

one of his alters was a Nazi camp doctor."
The policeman blinked:
"Beg your pardon?"
"My patient was a Polish Jew. He spent three years in

various concentration camps, including Auschwitz."
"I heard of Auschwitz." - Said the policeman smugly.
"There, he and his young wife, Sarah, were subjected to

medical experiments conducted by Nazi doctors in
white robes."
"Medical experiments?"
"You don't want to know the details, believe me." - It

was the psychiatrist's turn at one-upmanship.
But the officer was insistent.
"They sterilized his wife. At first, they injected some

substance to her ovaries through a vein in her leg. Then
they extracted her womb and what was left of her
reproductive system. She was awake the entire time.
They did not bother with antiseptics. She died of
infection in excruciating pain."
The policeman coughed nervously.

"When my patient was liberated, at the beginning of
1945, he developed a host of mental health problems.
One of them was Dissociative Identity Disorder,
formerly known as Multiple Personality Disorder."
The cop scribbled something and mumbled to himself.
"He had three alters. In other words, his original

personality fractured to at least three parts: the original
He, another part that assumed the identity of his dead
wife, and a part that became the doctor that tortured
them. In the last few years, every night, he enacted
scenes from their incarceration. The doctor would come
to him, an hour or so after he fell asleep, and conduct
various procedures on his body."
"Jesus!" - Blurted the policeman and went visibly pale.
"This is called 'night terror'. The subject is asleep. You

cannot wake him up. But he believes himself to be wide
awake and experiences extremes of terror. Usually, he
cannot even respond because he is momentarily
paralyzed. We call it 'sleep paralysis'"
"But then, if he cannot move, how did he kill himself? It

was clearly suicide. We found the syringe. Only his
fingerprints are on it. We were able to trace down the
pharmacy where he bought it. He injected himself with
some kind of acidic home detergent."
"Yes, it was suicide." - Agreed the psychiatrist, shut her

eyes, and rubbed her temples - "As he grew older, he
also developed Rapid Eye Movement Behavioral
Disorder. This meant that after he was paralyzed by the
night terror, he was actually able to enact it at a later
stage of his sleep. He played the doctor, he played
himself resisting the doctor, he played his wife being
mutilated by the doctor. He wielded knives, syringes,
wounded himself numerous times. You can find all the
hospital admission forms in his file. I gave him anti-
depressants. We talked. Nothing helped. He was beyond
help. Some patients are beyond help." - Her voice
quivered.
5. Help
"I killed him, Sarah, he's dead."
"I am glad."
"He will no longer bother us. We can be together again.

I won't be having the dreams. I won't be attacking you
anymore."
"That's good, Max."
"I peeled his face back, as he did to me. I injected him

with the green liquid as he did to you. Revenge is sweet.
I know it now."
"I love you, Max."
"And I never stopped loving you, Sarah. Not for a single

moment."
Return
A Dream Come True
"They call it: 'sleep deprivation'. I call it: hell. I can't

remember the last time I have slept well, dreamlessly.
You may say that it is to be expected when one is
cooped up in a 4-by-4 cell, awaiting one's execution.
But, I found myself engulfed by insomnia long before
that. Indeed, as I kept telling my incompetent lawyer,
one thing led to another. I hacked my wife to tiny pieces
because of my phantasmagoric visions, not the other
way around.
But, I am jumping the queue. Allow me to retrace.
Ever since I was apprehended and detained, fourteen

months ago, I have embarked on this prolonged
nocturnal time travel. The minute I started to doze off, I
was catapulted into the past: I relived the first encounter
with my wife to be, the courtship, the trip to Europe, our
marriage, the house we bought, the birth of our son - all
seemingly in real time, as protracted episodes.
Those were no ordinary hallucinations either. They were

so vivid, so tangible, catering to my every sense, that,
when I woke up, startled by the proximity of the damp
walls, the rigidity of my bunk, and the coarseness of my
uniform, I would lay awake for hours on end,
disoriented and depleted by the experience.
Gradually, I came to dread the night. It was as though

my past rushed forth, aiming to converge with my
hideous and hopeless present. The dreams that hounded
me viciously were excruciatingly detailed, self-
consistent, and their narrative - my autobiography - was
congruent and continuous: I could smell Mary, feel the
humid warmth of her breath, play with her hair, listen to
her halting sentences. These specters progressed in an
inevitable chronology: her adulterous affair, my
consuming jealousy, our confrontations. I could predict
the content of each and every ephemeral chapter in this
hypnopompic saga simply because I had experienced
them all beforehand as my very life.
I found the dreams' meticulous omniscience unnerving.

I could not accept the perfection and impeccability thus
imputed to my recollections. It all felt so real: when I
wiped Mary's tears, my hand went wet; when I attended
to our oft-neglected newborn, his smile was captivating,
not a microsecond longer than it would have been in
vivo; I bumped into furniture and bled as a result. Come
morning, I was bruised.
Sometimes, when I woke up from such a trance, my

heart expanded with insane anticipation: the cell, the
moldy paraphernalia of the penitentiary, the solid bars,
the vulgar images etched into the walls by countless
predecessors - all these looked so ethereal compared to
my nightly visitations! I would touch them
disbelievingly until reality sank in and, heavyhearted, I
would recline and stare at the murk that marked the
ceiling, waiting for the sun to referee between my two
existences.
Inexorably, my autolytic nightmares proceeded. When I
confronted Mary with her infidelity, her dream-state
wraith reacted exactly as its corporeal inspiration did in
truth: contemning me, disparaging, mocking. I woke up
perspiring and short of breath, cognizant of what would
undoubtedly unfold next time I succumb to my
overwhelming fatigue. I did not want to go through it
again. I tortured my flesh into a full state of awakening,
to no avail. Soon, I was aslumber and in the throes of
yet another heinous segment.
This time, I found myself contemplating a kitchen knife

embedded in a pool of darkening blood on the linoleum-
covered floor. Mary was sprawled across the dining
table in precarious acclivity, about to slip onto the
abattoir. Her hair was matted, her eyes glazed, her skin a
waxy tautness, and her finger pointed at me accusingly.
I felt surprisingly composed, dimly aware that this is but
a dream, that it had already happened.
Still, there was a sense of urgency and an inner dialog

that prompted me to act. I picked up the gory implement
and plunged it into Mary's neck. Dismemberment in the
service of disposal occupied my mind in the next few
hours as I separated limb from limb, sometimes sliding
as I stepped onto the viscous muck. Finally, the work
was done. Mary was no more.
I then stirred, glaring with lachrymose eyes at the

glimmerings of incipient sunshine across the hall. The
wardens in their first rounds bellowed our names
ominously during the morning call. I examined myself
guiltily and apprehensively, but fourteen months of
scrubbing had left no trace of Mary. My hands were
clean.
I realized that the only way to put an end to this

tormenting playback of my crime was to sleep at once
and to intentionally traverse the time between my
display of butchery and my current incarceration.
Having barely digested the meager and rancid breakfast,
I alternately cajoled and coerced myself into embracing
the horror that awaited me. Throughout the next few
days, I nodded off fitfully, recreating in my visions my
blood-splattered effort to hack Mary's lifeless corpse to
pieces; my ill-conceived attempt to flee; my capture; my
trial and the verdict.
Finally, the night came that I feared most. I meditated,

drawing deep breaths as I sought the arms of Morpheus.
As I drifted away, I became vaguely aware of an odd
convergence between my dream and my surroundings.
In my fantasy, I was leg-fettered and manacled. Two
beefy policemen unloaded me from the ramp of a truck
and handed me over to the prison guards who led me, in
turn, to my cell.
My dreams and reality having thus merged, I strove to

wake up. In my nightmare, everything was in its place:
the rusty bucket, the stone bunk, the fetid mattress, the
infested blanket, the overhead naked bulb, way out of
reach. I watched myself lying on the frigid slab. Startled
and profoundly perturbed I asked myself: how could I
occupy the same spot twice over? Wasn't I already
recumbent there, dreaming this, dreaming that I am
posing these questions? But, if this were a dream, where
is the real me? Why haven't I woken up, as I have done
countless times before?
As the answers eluded me, I panicked. I shook the bars

violently, banging my head against them. I was trapped
in a delusion, but everyone around me seemed to think
me real. The wardens rushed o restrain me, their faces
contorted with disdain and rage. A block-mate yelled:
"Hold on, buddy! It ain't so bad after a while!". A medic
was summoned to look at my wounds.
The dream dragged on with none of the signs that

hitherto heralded the transition to wakefulness. I tried
every trick I knew to emerge from this interminable
nether-state: I shut and opened my eyes in rapid
succession; I pinched my forearm blue; I splashed water
from the crumbling sink on my face; I iterated the
names of all the states of the Union ... In vain. I was
unable to extricate myself!
In my overpowering anxiety, I came with this idea:

ensnared as I was in my nightmare, if I were to go to
sleep and dream again, surely I would find my way back
to reality! For what a dream is to reality, surely reality is
to the dream? Reality, in other words, is merely a
dreamer's reverie!
And so I did. Enmeshed in my nightmare, I went to

sleep and dreamed of waking up to face this court. I
want to believe with all my heart that you and I are real.
But, it isn't easy. You see, your Honor, I have been here
before and I know the outcome. Had I dreamt it? I shall
soon find out, I daresay. Here I am, Your Honour,
unable to tell one from the other. Do with me as you
please."
My lawyer rose and called to the stand the medical

doctor that attended to my lacerations after my latest
bout of raging incoherence. As he creaked his way
across the wooden floor, the good practitioner glanced
at me and nodded. I ignored him, unsure whether he is
factual, or just a figment of my overwrought and febrile
constitution.
At the bailiff's prompt, he raised his hand, swore on a

hefty Bible and took his seat. Having responded to some
perfunctory enquiries about his qualifications and
position, he settled down to reply to my questions, put
to him via my lawyer:
"I wouldn't go as far as saying that your client is

medically, or even legally insane. He suffers from a
severe case of pseudoinsomnia, though, that much is
true."
Prompted as expected, the doctor elaborated:
"Your client sleeps well and regularly. All the

physiological indicators are as they ought to be during a
satisfactory and healthy somnolence. Moreover, your
client has dreams, exactly like the rest of us. The only
difference is that he dreams that he is awake."
Judge and jury jerked their heads in astounded
incomprehension. The witness continued to enlighten
the bench:
"Your honor, in his dreams, this patient fully believes

that he is awake. People afflicted with this disorder
complain of recurrent insomnia, even though our tests
consistently fail to turn up a sleep disorder. In extremis,
the very boundaries between wakefulness and napping
get blurred. They find it difficult to tell if they are
merely dreaming that they are awake, or are truly not
asleep."
He rummaged among his papers until he found the

transcripts of his interviews with me:
"In this patient's case, he developed pseudoinsomnia

after he discovered his wife's liaison with another man."
- The young doctor blushed - "He then began to dream
that he is awake and that he is planning and executing
the gruesome assassination of his spouse. Of course,
throughout this time, he was sound asleep. The dreams
he was having were so vivid and have processed such
traumatic material that the patient remembered them in
detail. Moreover, fully believing himself to be awake,
he did not realize these were only dreams. He convinced
himself that the events he had dreamt of had actually
transpired."
The judge bent forward:
"Doctor," - he droned, evidently annoyed - "I don't

understand: if the patient believes that he had already
murdered his wife, why is he a danger either to himself
or to her, let alone to society at large? Surely, he is not
going to murder her a second time?"
The court erupted in laughter and the judge, smug on

the podium, was particularly slow to use his gable to
quell the hooting.
The doctor removed his eyeglasses and rubbed the

lenses carefully:
"The patient's sense of reality is impaired, Your Honor.

For instance, he believes that he is in prison, like in his
dreams, although he has been told numerous times that
he has been committed to a mental health facility for
evaluation. As far as he is concerned, his existence has
become one big blur. Every time his dreams are
contradicted, he may turn unsettled and agitated. He
may even lose control and become violent. Next time he
comes across his estranged wife, he may truly kill her,
as a re-enactment and affirmation of his nightmares and
he is bound to consider such a deed a harmless dream."
"So," - the judge interrupted him, impatiently - "it is

your view that he should be committed?"
"I would definitely recommend it." - Concluded the

doctor.
When all the formalities were over, the judge rose from
his chair and we all stood up. As he reached the entrance
door to his chambers, he turned around, puzzled:
"By the way, where is his wife? I haven't seen her even
once during these proceedings. Anyone has
communicated with her? Technically, she is his
guardian, you know."
There was a long silence as everyone avoided everyone

else's gaze, shuffled feet, and ruffled papers.
That was my last chance:
"I murdered her, Your Honor. I have been telling you for
months now!" - I shouted.
The judge eyed me pityingly, sighed, shrugged his

shoulders and flung the door open, crossing into the
penumbral recesses beyond.
Return
Cutting to Existence
My little brother cuts himself into existence.
With razor tongue I try to shave his pain,
he wouldn't listen.
His ears are woolen screams, the wrath
of heartbeats breaking to the surface.
His own Red Art.
When he cups his bleeding hands
the sea of our childhood
wells in my eyes
wells in his veins
like common salt.
Return
In the concentration camp called Home
In the concentration camp called Home,
we report in striped pajamas
to the barefeet commandant,
Our Mother orchestrating
our daily holocaust.
Burrowing her finger-
-nails through my palms,
a scream frozen between us,
a stalactite of terror
in the green caves of her eyes
there, sentenced to forced labour:
to mine her veins of hatred
to shovel her contempt
to pile scorn upon scorn
beating(s) a path.
At noon, Our Mother
leads us to the chambers
naked, ripples of flesh
she turns on the gas
and watches our hunger
as her food devours us.
Return
Sally Ann
I wrote, Sally Ann, I wrote:
Shot from the cannon of abuse

as unwise missiles do.
Course set.
Explosive clouds that mark

your video destination.
Experts interpret,
pricking with laser markers,
inflated dialects
of doom.
Hitting the target, you

splinter, a spectacle
of fire and of smoke.
The molten ashes,

the cold metallic remnants,
the core...
A peace accord
between you and your self.
Return
The Miracle of the Kisses
That night, the cock denied him thrice.

His mother and the whore downloaded him,
nails etched into his palms,
his thorny forehead glistening,
his body speared.
He wanted to revive unto their moisture.
But the nauseating scents of vinegar
and Roman legionnaires,
the dampness of the cave,
and then that final stone...
His brain wide open,
supper digested
that was to have been his last.
He missed so his disciples,
the miracle of their kisses.
He was determined not to decompose.
Return
Guide to Coping with
Narcissists and Psychopaths
Save for later reference! Forward to interested parties and relevant

discussion and mailing groups!
Click with your mouse on the links (the blue text).
Coping with Narcissistic and Psychopathic Abusers
http://samvak.tripod.com/faq4.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/abusefamily19.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/npdtips.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/5.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/4.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/journal56.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/journal68.html
Strategies for Coping with Abusers (General)
http://samvak.tripod.com/abuse.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/abuse3.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/abuse21a.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/abuse21b.html
Working with the System and with Professionals
How to Cope with Stalkers and Paranoids
http://samvak.tripod.com/abuse21a.html
http://samvak.tripod.com/abuse21b.html
Return
Narcissistic abuse in the workplace and
Narcissism of authority figures
Click on the links:
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/faq81.html
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/journal79.html
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/15.html
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/corporatenarcissism
.html
http://www.healthyplace.com/personality-
disorders/transcripts/narcissism-in-the-workplace/menu-id-62/
http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/pp114.html
http://www.tipsofallsorts.com/bully.html
http://open-
site.org/Society/Issues/Violence_and_Abuse/Workplace/
http://www.nypress.com/16/7/news&columns/feature.cfm
http://www.bullyonline.org/workbully/npd.htm
http://www.freepint.com/issues/240703.htm
http://www.abc.net.au/rn/talks/bbing/stories/s1158704.ht
m
http://www.freepint.com/issues/260505.htm
http://alaskaclubs.fitdv.com/new/articles/article.html?artid=640
Return
THE AUTHOR
Shmuel (Sam) Vaknin
Curriculum Vitae
Born in 1961 in Qiryat-Yam, Israel.
Served in the Israeli Defence Force (1979-1982) in

training and education units.
Education
Completed a few semesters in the Technion – Israel

Institute of Technology, Haifa.
Ph.D. in Philosophy (major: Philosophy of Physics) –

Pacific Western University, California, USA.
Graduate of numerous courses in Finance Theory and

International Trading.
Certified E-Commerce Concepts Analyst by

Brainbench.
Certified in Psychological Counselling Techniques by

Brainbench.
Certified Financial Analyst by Brainbench.

Full proficiency in Hebrew and in English.
Business Experience
1980 to 1983
Founder and co-owner of a chain of computerised

information kiosks in Tel-Aviv, Israel.
1982 to 1985
Senior positions with the Nessim D. Gaon Group of

Companies in Geneva, Paris and New-York (NOGA and
APROFIM SA):
– Chief Analyst of Edible Commodities in the Group's

Headquarters in Switzerland
– Manager of the Research and Analysis Division
– Manager of the Data Processing Division
– Project Manager of the Nigerian Computerised
Census
– Vice President in charge of RND and Advanced
Technologies
– Vice President in charge of Sovereign Debt Financing
1985 to 1986
Represented Canadian Venture Capital Funds in Israel.
1986 to 1987
General Manager of IPE Ltd. in London. The firm

financed international multi-lateral countertrade and
leasing transactions.
1988 to 1990
Co-founder and Director of "Mikbats-Tesuah", a

portfolio management firm based in Tel-Aviv.
Activities included large-scale portfolio management,
underwriting, forex trading and general financial
advisory services.
1990 to Present
Freelance consultant to many of Israel's Blue-Chip

firms, mainly on issues related to the capital markets in
Israel, Canada, the UK and the USA.
Consultant to foreign RND ventures and to

Governments on macro-economic matters.
Freelance journalist in various media in the United

States.
1990 to 1995
President of the Israel chapter of the Professors World

Peace Academy (PWPA) and (briefly) Israel
representative of the "Washington Times".
1993 to 1994
Co-owner and Director of many business enterprises:
– The Omega and Energy Air-Conditioning Concern

– AVP Financial Consultants
– Handiman Legal Services
Total annual turnover of the group: 10 million USD.
Co-owner, Director and Finance Manager of COSTI
Ltd. – Israel's largest computerised information vendor
and developer. Raised funds through a series of private
placements locally in the USA, Canada and London.
1993 to 1996
Publisher and Editor of a Capital Markets Newsletter

distributed by subscription only to dozens of subscribers
countrywide.
In a legal precedent in 1995 – studied in business

schools and law faculties across Israel – was tried for
his role in an attempted takeover of Israel's Agriculture
Bank.
Was interned in the State School of Prison Wardens.
Managed the Central School Library, wrote, published

and lectured on various occasions.
Managed the Internet and International News

Department of an Israeli mass media group, "Ha-
Tikshoret and Namer".
Assistant in the Law Faculty in Tel-Aviv University (to

Prof. S.G. Shoham).
1996 to 1999
Financial consultant to leading businesses in

Macedonia, Russia and the Czech Republic.
Economic commentator in "Nova Makedonija",

"Dnevnik", "Makedonija Denes", "Izvestia",
"Argumenti i Fakti", "The Middle East Times", "The
New Presence", "Central Europe Review", and other
periodicals, and in the economic programs on various
channels of Macedonian Television.
Chief Lecturer in courses in Macedonia organised by

the Agency of Privatization, by the Stock Exchange, and
by the Ministry of Trade.
1999 to 2002
Economic Advisor to the Government of the Republic

of Macedonia and to the Ministry of Finance.
2001 to 2003
Senior Business Correspondent for United Press

International (UPI).
2007 -
Associate Editor, Global Politician
Founding Analyst, The Analyst Network
Contributing Writer, The American Chronicle Media

Group
Expert, Self-growth.com
2008
Columnist and analyst in "Nova Makedonija", "Fokus",

and "Kapital" (Macedonian papers and newsweeklies).
Seminars and lectures on economic issues in various
forums in Macedonia.
2008-
Advisor to the Minister of Health of Macedonia on

healthcare reforms
Web and Journalistic Activities
Author of extensive Web sites in:
– Psychology ("Malignant Self Love") - An Open

Directory Cool Site for 8 years.
– Philosophy ("Philosophical Musings"),
– Economics and Geopolitics ("World in Conflict and

Transition").
Owner of the Narcissistic Abuse Study Lists and the

Abusive Relationships Newsletter (more than 6,000
members).
Owner of the Economies in Conflict and Transition

Study List , the Toxic Relationships Study List, and the
Links and Factoid Study List.
Editor of mental health disorders and Central and

Eastern Europe categories in various Web directories
(Open Directory, Search Europe, Mentalhelp.net).
Editor of the Personality Disorders, Narcissistic
Personality Disorder, the Verbal and Emotional Abuse,
and the Spousal (Domestic) Abuse and Violence topics
on Suite 101 and Bellaonline.
Columnist and commentator in "The New Presence",

United Press International (UPI), InternetContent,
eBookWeb, PopMatters, Global Politician, The Analyst
Network, Conservative Voice, The American Chronicle
Media Group, eBookNet.org, and "Central Europe
Review".
Publications and Awards
"Managing Investment Portfolios in States of

Uncertainty", Limon Publishers, Tel-Aviv, 1988
"The Gambling Industry", Limon Publishers, Tel-Aviv,

1990
"Requesting My Loved One – Short Stories", Yedioth

Aharonot, Tel-Aviv, 1997
"The Suffering of Being Kafka" (electronic book of

Hebrew and English Short Fiction), Prague, 1998-2004
"The Macedonian Economy at a Crossroads – On the

Way to a Healthier Economy" (dialogues with Nikola
Gruevski), Skopje, 1998
"The Exporters' Pocketbook", Ministry of Trade,

Republic of Macedonia, Skopje, 1999
"Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited",
Narcissus Publications, Prague, 1999-2007 (Read
excerpts - click here)
The Narcissism Series (e-books regarding relationships

with abusive narcissists), Prague, 1999-2007
Personality Disorders Revisited (e-book about

personality disorders), Prague, 2007
"After the Rain – How the West Lost the East",

Narcissus Publications in association with Central
Europe Review/CEENMI, Prague and Skopje, 2000
Winner of numerous awards, among them Israel's

Council of Culture and Art Prize for Maiden Prose
(1997), The Rotary Club Award for Social Studies
(1976), and the Bilateral Relations Studies Award of the
American Embassy in Israel (1978).
Hundreds of professional articles in all fields of finance

and economics, and numerous articles dealing with
geopolitical and political economic issues published in
both print and Web periodicals in many countries.
Many appearances in the electronic media on subjects in

philosophy and the sciences, and concerning economic
matters.
Write to Me:
palma@unet.com.mk
narcissisticabuse-owner@yahoogroups.com
My Web Sites:
Economy/Politics:
http://ceeandbalkan.tripod.com/
Psychology:
http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/
Philosophy:
http://philosophos.tripod.com/
Poetry:
http://samvak.tripod.com/contents.html
Fiction:
http://samvak.tripod.com/sipurim.html
Return
Abused? Stalked? Harassed? Bullied? Victimized?
Afraid? Confused? Need HELP? DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
Had a Narcissistic Parent?

Married to a Narcissist – or Divorcing One?
Afraid your children will turn out the same?
Want to cope with this pernicious, baffling condition?
OR
Are You a Narcissist – or suspect that You are one…
This book will teach you how to…
Cope, Survive, and Protect Your Loved Ones!
You should read…
"Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited"

The EIGHTH, REVISED PRINTING (January 2007) is now available!
Seven additional e-books, All NEW Editions, JUST RELEASED!!!

Malignant Self Love, Toxic Relationships,
Pathological Narcissism, Coping with Divorce,
The Narcissist and Psychopath in the Workplace – and MORE!!!
Click on this link to purchase the PRINT BOOK and/or

the EIGHT E-BOOKS
http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/thebook.html
Sam Vaknin published the EIGHTH, REVISED IMPRESSION of his book

about relationships with abusive narcissists, "Malignant Self Love –
Narcissism Revisited".
The book deals with the Narcissistic Personality Disorder and its
effects on the narcissist and his nearest and dearest – in 102
frequently asked questions and two essays – a total of 600 pages!
Print Edition from BARNES AND NOBLE and AMAZON
Barnes and Noble – "Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited"

EIGHTH, Revised, Impression (January 2007)
ON SALE starting at $40.45 !!!
INSTEAD OF the publisher's list price of $54.95 (including shipping
and handling)!!!
That's more than $14 off the publisher's list price!!!!
Click on this link to purchase the paper edition:
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/bookSearch/isbnInquiry.asp?r=
1&ISBN=9788023833843
"Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited" is now available from

Amazon Canada – Click on this link:
http://www.amazon.ca/exec/obidos/tg/detail/offer-listing/-
/8023833847/new/
And from Amazon.com – Click on this link:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/8023833847/
Print Edition from the PUBLISHER
The previous revised impression of Sam Vaknin's "Malignant Self –

Love – Narcissism Revisited".
Comes with an exclusive BONUS PACK (not available through
Barnes and Noble or Amazon).
Contains the entire text: essays, frequently asked questions and
appendices regarding pathological narcissism and the Narcissistic
Personality Disorder (NPD).
The publisher charges the full list price – but throws into the
bargain a bonus pack with hundreds of additional pages.
Click on this link:
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_MSL
Free excerpts from the EIGHTH, Revised Impression of "Malignant
Self Love – Narcissism Revisited" are available as well as a free
NEW EDITION of the Narcissism Book of Quotes
Click on this link to download the files:
http://www.narcissistic-abuse.com/freebooks.html
"After the Rain – How the West Lost the East"

The history, cultures, societies, and economies of countries in
transition in the Balkans.
Click on this link to purchase this print book:
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_ATR
Electronic Books (e-books) from the Publisher
An electronic book is a computer file, sent to you as an attachment to an

e-mail message. Just save it to your hard disk and click on the file to open,
read, and learn!
1. "Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited"

Eighth, Revised Edition (January 2007)
The e-book version of Sam Vaknin's "Malignant Self – Love –
Narcissism Revisited". Contains the entire text: essays, frequently
asked questions (FAQs) and appendices regarding pathological
narcissism and the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
Click on this link to purchase the e-book:
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_MSL-EBOOK
2. "The Narcissism Series"

EIGHT e-books (more than 2500 pages), including the full text of
"Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited", regarding Pathological
Narcissism, relationships with abusive narcissists and psychopaths,
and the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
Click on this link to purchase the EIGHT e-books:
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_SERIES
3. "Toxic Relationships – Abuse and its Aftermath"
Fourth Edition (February 2006)
How to identify abuse, cope with it, survive it, and deal with your
abuser and with the system in divorce and custody issues.
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_ABUSE
4. "The Narcissist and Psychopath in the Workplace"

(September 2006)
Identify abusers, bullies, and stalkers in the workplace (bosses,
colleagues, suppliers, and authority figures) and learn how to cope
with them effectively.
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_WORKPLACE
5. "Abusive Relationships Workbook" (February 2006)

Self-assessment questionnaires, tips, and tests for victims of
abusers, batterers, and stalkers in various types of relationships.
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_WORKBOOK
6. "Pathological Narcissism FAQs"

Dozens of Frequently Asked Questions regarding Pathological
Narcissism, relationships with abusive narcissists, and the
Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_FAQS
7. "The World of the Narcissist"

A book-length psychodynamic study of pathological narcissism,
relationships with abusive narcissists, and the Narcissistic
Personality Disorder, using a new vocabulary.
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_ESSAY
8. "Excerpts from the Archives of the Narcissism List"
Hundreds of excerpts from the archives of the Narcissistic Abuse
Study List regarding Pathological Narcissism, relationships with
abusive narcissists, and the Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_EXCERPTS
9. "Diary of a Narcissist" (November 2005)

The anatomy of one man's mental illness – its origins, its unfolding,
its outcomes.
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_JOURNAL
10. "After the Rain – How the West Lost the East"
The history, cultures, societies, and economies of countries in
transition in the Balkans.
http://www.ccnow.com/cgi-local/cart.cgi?vaksam_ATR-EBOOK
Download Free Electronic Books

Click on this link:
More about the Books and Additional Resources
The Eighth, Revised Impression (January 2007) of the Print Edition

of "Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited" includes:
• The full text of "Malignant Self Love – Narcissism Revisited"
• The full text of 102 Frequently Asked Questions and Answers
• Covering all the dimensions of Pathological Narcissism and Abuse
in Relationships
• An Essay – The Narcissist's point of view
• Bibliography
• 600 printed pages in a quality paper book
• Digital Bonus Pack! (available only when you purchase the
previous edition from the Publisher) – Bibliography, three e-
books, additional FAQs, appendices and more – hundreds of
additional pages!
Testimonials and Additional Resources

You can read Readers' Reviews at the Barnes and Noble Web page
dedicated to "Malignant Self Love" – HERE:
http://barnesandnoble.bfast.com/booklink/click?ISBN=8023833847
Dozens of Links and Resources

Click on these links:
The Narcissistic Abuse Study List
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse
The Toxic Relationships Study List
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/toxicrelationships
Abusive Relationships Newsletter
http://groups.google.com/group/narcissisticabuse
Participate in Discussions about Abusive Relationships

http://personalitydisorders.suite101.com/discussions.cfm
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Narcissistic_Personality_Disorder
http://groups.msn.com/NARCISSISTICPERSONALITYDISORDER
Links to Therapist Directories, Psychological Tests, NPD

Resources, Support Groups for Narcissists and Their Victims,
and Tutorials
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/narcissisticabuse/message/5458
Support Groups for Victims of Narcissists and Narcissists

http://dmoz.org/Health/Mental_Health/Disorders/Personality/Narcissistic
BE WELL, SAFE AND WARM WHEREVER YOU ARE!

Sam Vaknin
Malignant Self Love
Narcissism Revisited
The Book
"Narcissists live in a state of constant rage, repressed
aggression, envy and hatred. They firmly believe that
everyone is like them. As a result, they are paranoid,
aggressive, haughty and erratic. Narcissists are
forever in pursuit of Narcissistic Supply.
They know no past or future, are not constrained by any
behavioural consistency, 'rules' of conduct or moral
considerations. You signal to a narcissist that you are a willing
source – and he is bound to extract his supply from you.
This is a reflex.
He would have reacted absolutely the same to any other
source. If what is needed to obtain supply from you is
intimations of intimacy – he will supply them liberally."
This book is comprised of two parts.
The first part contains 102 Frequently Asked Questions
related to the various aspects of pathological narcissism,
relationships with abusive narcissists, and the
Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
The second part is an exposition of the various psychodynamic
theories regarding pathological narcissism and
a proposed new vocabulary.
The Author
Sam Vaknin was born in Israel in 1961. A financial consultant
and columnist, he lived (and published) in 12 countries.
He is a published and awarded author of short fiction and
reference and an editor of mental health categories in various
Web directories. This is his twelfth book.

Abuse, Trauma, and Torture - Their Consequences and Effects

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Abuse, Trauma, and Torture - Their Consequences and Effects

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Abuse, Trauma, and Torture - Their Consequences and Effects

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

What topics are covered in the document?

What topics are covered in the document?

What is pathological narcissism?

What is pathological narcissism?

Abuse, Torture, And

Trauma and Their

Sam Vaknin, Ph.D.

The Narcissist in the Workplace

, Abuse, Torture - An Overview

Torture, Abuse, and Trauma – In Fiction and Poetry

Guide to Coping with Narcissists and

Pathological Narcissism – An Overview

What is Pathological Narcissism?

I hate routine. When I find myself doing the same things

Comments on recent research by Roy Baumeister.

Is pathological narcissism a blessing or a malediction?

The answer is: it depends. Healthy narcissism is a

Pathological narcissism is wrongly described as too

Pathological narcissism involves an impaired,

Still, dysfunctions are reactions to abnormal

Paradoxically, his dysfunction allows the narcissist to

That the narcissist functions at all - is because of his

In time, the narcissist learns how to leverage his

Narcissists are obsessed by delusions of fantastic

Narcissists are prone to self-defeating and self-

The Self-Punishing, Guilt-Purging Behaviors

These are intended to inflict punishment on the

This is very reminiscent of a compulsive-ritualistic

The narcissist's life is thus transformed into an on-going

Such a narcissist masochistically frustrates his deepest

In their book "Personality Disorders in Modern Life",

The Extracting Behaviors

People with Personality Disorders (PDs) are very afraid

PDs interpret intimacy as counter-dependence,

The Relief of Being Abandoned

We are all, to some degree, inertial, afraid of new

Moreover, to the narcissist, a challenge, or even a

The narcissist's enhanced performance is predicated on

The Narcissist as a Failure and a Loser

Three traits conspire to render the narcissist a failure

The narcissist's sense of entitlement encourages his

The narcissist's arrogance and belief that he is superior

Unable to work in a team, to compromise, to give credit

Even when offered a job or a business opportunity, the

But this passive-aggressive (negativistic and

Life forces most narcissists into the hard slog of a

But there are other narcissists, the "luckier" ones, those

Confabulations are an important part of life. They serve

The narcissist is the guru at the centre of a cult. Like

The Narcissist and Psychopath in Society

The Narcissist and Psychopath as Criminals

The Narcissist is Above the Law

The Narcissist as Liar and Con-man

Pathological Narcissism, Narcissistic Personality

Does the Narcissist Have a Multiple Personality

The Narcissist as Know-it-all

The Narcissist as VAMPIRE or MACHINE

Narcissists and Psychopaths Devalue Their

Violent, Vindictive, Sadistic, and Psychopathic

Portrait of the Narcissist as a Young Man