Businesss Ethics
Businesss Ethics
Businesss Ethics
Objectives
After reading this chapter, you will be able to: Define business ethics and examine its importance. Detect some of the ethical issues that may arise in business. Specify how businesses can promote ethical behaviour. Define social responsibility and explain its relevance to business. Debate an organizations social responsibilities to owners, employees, consumers, the environment, and the community. Evaluate the ethics of a businesss decision.
30
INTRODUCTION
As the opening vignette illustrates, determining how to conduct business appropriately can be challenging. Wrongdoing by businesses has focused public attention and government involvement to encourage more acceptable business conduct. Any business decision may be judged as right or wrong, ethical or unethical, legal or illegal. In this chapter, we will take a look at the role of ethics and social responsibility in business decision making. First, we define business ethics and examine why it is important to understand ethics role in business. Next, we explore a number of business ethics issues to help you learn to recognize such issues when they arise. Finally, we consider steps businesses can take to improve ethical behaviour in their organizations. The second half of the chapter focuses on social responsibility. We define social responsibility and then survey some important responsibility issues and how companies have responded to them.
In this chapter, we define business ethics as the principles and standards that determine acceptable conduct in business organizations. The acceptability of behaviour in business is determined by customers, competitors, government regulators, interest groups, and the public, as well as each individuals personal moral principles and values. For example, the Competition Bureau of Canada announced on August 18, 2003, that Akzo Nobel Chemicals BV pleaded guilty in the Federal Court of Canada and was sentenced to fines totalling $2.9 million for its part in conspiracies to fix prices in the market for an important animal feed additive and a chemical used in numerous commercial and consumer products.2 Many consumers and social advocates believe that businesses should not only make a profit but also consider the social implications of their activities. We define social responsibility as a businesss obligation to maximize its positive impact and minimize its negative impact on society. Although many people use the terms social responsibility and ethics interchangeably, they do not mean the same thing. Business ethics relates to an individuals or a work groups decisions that society evaluates as right or wrong, whereas social responsibility is a broader concept that concerns the impact of the entire businesss activities on society. From an ethical perspective, for example, we may be concerned about a health care organization or practitioner overcharging the provincial government for medical services. From a social responsibility perspective, we might be concerned about the impact that this overcharging will have on the ability of the health care system to provide adequate services for all citizens. The most basic ethical and social responsibility concerns have been codified as laws and regulations that encourage businesses to conform to societys standards, values, and attitudes. At a minimum, managers are expected to obey these laws and regulations. Most legal issues arise as choices that society deems unethical, irresponsible, or otherwise unacceptable. However, all actions deemed unethical by society are not necessarily illegal, and both legal and ethical concerns change over time. Business law refers to the laws and regulations that govern the conduct of business. Many problems and conflicts in business can be avoided if owners, managers, and employees know more about business law and the legal system. Business ethics, social responsibility, and laws together act as a compliance system requiring that businesses and employees act responsibly in society.
Chapter 2
31
32
Learning to recognize ethical issues is the most important step in understanding business ethics. An ethical issue is an identifiable problem, situation, or opportunity that requires a person to choose from among several actions that may be evaluated as right or wrong, ethical or unethical. In business, such a choice often involves weighing monetary profit against what a person considers appropriate conduct. The best way to judge the ethics of a decision is to look at a situation from a customers or competitors viewpoint: Should liquid-diet manufacturers make unsubstantiated claims about their products? Should an engineer agree to divulge her former employers trade secrets to ensure that she gets a better job with a competitor? Should a salesperson omit facts about a products poor safety record in his presentation to a customer? Such questions require the decision maker to evaluate the ethics of his or her choice. Not all shortcomings in business ethics are global in scope. Many affect us more directly and with greater immediacy. With the increasing complexity of modern cars, fewer people can assess the appropriateness of repairs made by mechanics or the fairness of the charge for carrying out those repairs. The Automobile Protection Association periodically uses a Mystery Car to evaluate auto repairs facilities. Their tests in May of 2002 found that the chances of overpaying for auto repairs were one in three. While some overcharges may be the result of honest error, it seems unlikely that the rate would be that high. Using a newly serviced vehicle with a disconnected vacuum hose as the test, the APA encountered repair costs ranging from no charge at a Vancouver Canadian Tire to $670 at Minit-tune and Brake, also in Vancouver. A total of 39 shops were tested in Vancouver, Montreal, and Toronto. Thirteen shops overcharged for work done or performed unnecessary repairs for a failure rate of 33 percent. Our financial well-being and that of honest businesses requires not only that we be aware of the high profile cases reported in the news but also that we exercise vigilance in our daily activities.5 Many business issues may seem straightforward and easy to resolve, but in reality, a person often needs several years of experience in business to understand what is ac-
Chapter 2
33
ceptable or ethical. For example, if you are a salesperson, when does offering a gift such as season basketball ticketsto a customer become a bribe rather than just a sales practice? Clearly, there are no easy answers to such a question. But the size of the transaction, the history of personal relationships within the particular company, as well as many other factors may determine whether an action will be judged as right or wrong by others. When Wal-Mart began selling sandals that strongly resembled the popular Teva Did A 1999 survey by KPMG found that 72.7 percent of brand, Mark Thatcher, founder of the Teva you companies have some sort of program focused on promoting ethical values and principles. Sports Sandal, took notice. Sales of Teva sandals know fell from US$69 million to US$42 million, and company executives believed this was because Wal-Mart was selling copies (or knock-offs) for 25 percent less. This ethical issue of right or wrong was resolved in court. Teva won the lawsuit, and Wal-Mart agreed to stop selling the shoes.6 Ethics are also related to the culture in which a business operates. In Canada or the United States, for example, it would be inappropriate for a businessperson to bring KPMG an elaborately wrapped gift to a prospective client on their first meetingthe gift www.kpmg.ca could be viewed as a bribe. In Japan, however, it is considered impolite not to bring a gift. Experience with the culture in which a business operates is critical to understanding what is ethical or unethical.
Ethical Issues
To help you understand ethical issues that perplex businesspeople today, we will take a brief look at some of them in this section. The vast number of news-format investigative programs has increased consumer and employee awareness of organizational misconduct. In addition, the multitude of cable channels and Internet resources has improved the awareness of ethical problems among the general public. An Ethics Resource Center/Society for Human Resource Management survey of US employees indicates that workers witness many instances of ethical misconduct in their organizations. The specific percentages are noted in Table 2.1. Note that workers report multiple observations of ethical misconduct; therefore, each category is an independent question of observed misconduct. When employees were asked the principal causes of unethical behaviour in their organizations, the key factor reported was overly aggressive financial or business objectives. Many of these issues relate to decisions and concerns that managers have to deal with daily. It is not possible to discuss every issue, of course. However, a discussion of a few issues can help you begin to recognize the ethical problems with which businesspersons must deal. Many ethical issues in business can be categorized in the context of their relation to conflicts of interest, fairness and honesty, communications, and business associations.
Lying to supervisors Falsifying records Alcohol and drug abuse Conflict of interest Stealing or theft Gift receipt/entertainment in violation of company policy 45% 36 36 34 27 26
Table 2.1
Percentage of Workers Who Say These Ethical Infractions Are Committed by Coworkers
Source: Ethics Resource Center/Society for Human Resource Management, 1997 Business Ethics Survey Report, p. 20.
34
Placing a song in an online musicsharing directory such as Kazaa is not considered distribution. The ruling denied the Canadian Recording Industry Association (CRIA) the court order needed to identify 29 uploaders that the CRIA claims illegally posted hundreds of songs on the Internet. This prevents the CRIA from seeking damages from these individuals through legal action. In the US, the Recording Industry of America (RIAA) has sued about 400 individuals for sharing music files on-
Conflict of Interest. A conflict of interest exists when a person must choose whether to advance his or her own personal interests or those of others. For example, a manager in a corporation is supposed to ensure that the company is profitable so that its stockholder-owners receive a return on their investment. In other words, the manager has a responsibility to investors. If she instead makes decisions that give her more power or money but do not help the company, then she has a conflict of interestshe is acting to benefit herself at the expense of her company and is not fulfilling her responsibilities. To avoid conflicts of interest, employees must be able to separate their personal financial interests from their business dealings. Perhaps one of the most widely publicized cases of conflict of interest in Canada was the acquisition of control of Maple Leaf Gardens Ltd. by Steven Stavro. After the death of his friend Harold Ballard in 1990, Stavro decided to purchase controlling interest in MLG. As a trustee of the Ballard estate and a member of the Board of Directors of MLG, Stavro had a fiduciary duty to obtain the best possible price for the shares. As the potential purchaser, it was of course in his best interest to obtain the shares as cheaply as possiblea classic conflict of interest. Stavro attempted to overcome the conflict by hiring Nesbitt Burns and RBC Dominion to carry out a valuation of the shares. Stavro offered a $2.00 premium over the valuation price of $32. While he did eventually gain control, it was only after legal challenges from Harold Ballards son, William, and the Public Trustee who oversaw the charities in Ballards will.
Chapter 2
35
payments, gifts, or special favours intended to influence the outcome of a decision
As mentioned earlier, it is considered improper to give or accept bribes payments, gifts, or special favours intended to influence the outcome of a decision. A bribe is a conflict of interest because it benefits an individual at the expense of an organization or society. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., may have the toughest policy against conflict of interest in the retail industry. Sam Walton, the late founder of Wal-Mart, prohibited company buyers from accepting so much as a cup of coffee from suppliers. The Wal-Mart policy is black and white and leaves no room for interpretation, and it is probably a factor in helping Wal-Mart reduce costs. Other retailers typically allow buyers to accept meals, small gifts, and outings such as golf, fishing, or hunting trips. Defence contractors, such as Lockheed Martin and Texas Instruments, have strict gift policies, as does the Royal Bank of Canada. Fairness and Honesty. Fairness and honesty are at the heart of business ethics and relate to the general values of decision makers. At a minimum, businesspersons are expected to follow all applicable laws and regulations. But beyond obeying the law, they are expected not to harm customers, employees, clients, or competitors knowingly through deception, misrepresentation, coercion, or discrimination. A recent survey showed that nearly one-fourth of workers have been asked to engage in an unethical act at work, and 41 percent carried out the act.8 One aspect of fairness relates to competition. Although numerous laws have been passed to foster competition and make monopolistic practices illegal, companies sometimes gain control over markets by using questionable practices that harm competition. Rivals of Microsoft, for example, have accused the software giant of using unfair and monopolistic practices to maintain market dominance with its Microsoft Network web browser. Competitors such as Netscape feel at a competitive disadvantage since the Microsoft Network is coupled with the Windows operating system and is readily available to 90 percent of the PC market. The US Justice Department has claimed that Microsoft wanted to hurt rival Netscape at all costs. The initial court judgment found in favour of the Justice Department. By November 2001 Microsoft had reached a tentative agreement with the Justice Department and nine of the 18 states that had filed the antitrust suit. In January of 2002 Netscape launched an antitrust lawsuit citing the same grounds that were used in the Justice Departments suit.9 Microsoft continues to be under legal attack in 2004in March the European Competition Commission assessed a record fine against the firm and in April Microsoft settled privately with Sun Microsystems for about $2 billion.10 Another aspect of fairness and honesty relates to disclosure of potential harm caused by product use. When Procter & Gamble introduced Olestra, the lowcholesterol fat substitute, products in which it was used had labels warning consumers of potential problems with abdominal cramping. Dishonesty has become a significant problem in North America. In a study conducted by the Josephson Institute, 92 percent of older teenagers admitted to lying and 70 percent admitted to cheating on tests. However, 97 percent of those surveyed say that good character is important, while 69 percent believe that the ethics of this generation are satisfactory.11 Communications. Communications is another area in which ethical concerns may arise. False and misleading advertising, as well as deceptive personal-selling tactics, anger consumers and can lead to the failure of a business. Truthfulness about product safety and quality are also important to consumers. In the pharmaceutical industry, for example, dietary supplements, such as herbs, are sold with limited regulation and testing, and many supplements are sold by small, independent marketers. Some tests show that herbs, such as ginseng, may be sold without enough of the ac-
36
tive ingredients to be effective. Now, large pharmaceutical firms, such as WarnerLambert, are entering the US$4 billion herb market and communicating the quality control and credibility associated with their names.12 However, ample opportunities remain for unethical firms to mislead consumers about herbal products. Some manufacturers fail to provide enough information for consumers about differences between products. In the contactlens-solution market, a number of manufacturers are marketing identical products with different prices. Bausch & Lomb, for example, priced its one-ounce bottle of Sensitive Eyes Drops at about $5.65. But a 12-ounce bottle of its Sensitive Eyes Saline Solution, which had the same ingredients and formulation but a different label, was priced at $2.79. Other manufacturers do the same thing. Says consultant Jack Trout, Its not only a sneaky way to make money, but its lousy marketing, the type of thing that backfires . . . when its made public.13 Another important aspect of communications that may raise ethical concerns relates to product labelling. Health warnings on cigarette packages were first imposed by federal law in 1989. In Managers have the responsibility to create a 1994 a new set of eight messages were required that covered the work environment that helps an organization top 35 percent of each main display surface of a cigarette packmaintain ethical business relationships while age. The Canadian system was adopted by Australia, Thailand, and achieving its objectives. Poland. The 1994 warnings also led to legislative proposals in both 1999 PhotoDisc, Inc. the United States and the European Union.
Chapter 2
37
In 1995 the Supreme Court of Canada ruled large parts of the Tobacco Products Control Act unconstitutional, removing the legal basis for imposing the warnings. New regulations were passed on June 26, 2000. The new act, requiring even more graphic warnings on 50 percent of the package panels, combined with inside package messages about health damage caused by tobacco and information about quitting, has also been challenged in court. The Quebec Superior Court ruled in favour of the government. Canadians are more willing to accept the guidance of government censors, and we have an almost complete ban on tobacco advertising under the Federal Tobacco Act of 1998. Business Relationships. The behaviour of businesspersons toward customers, suppliers, and others in their workplace may also generate ethical concerns. Ethical behaviour within a business involves keeping company secrets, meeting obligations and responsibilities, and avoiding undue pressure that may force others to act unethically. Managers, in particular, because of the authority of their position, have the opportunity to influence employees actions. For example, a manager can influence employees to use pirated computer software to save costs. The use of illegal software puts the employee and the company at legal risk, but employees may feel pressured to do so by their superiors authority. On the other hand, new network management programs enable managers to try to control when and where software programs can be used. This could introduce an issue of personal privacy: Should your company be able to monitor your computer? Unauthorized copying of games and other programs has exposed companies to copyright-infringement suits, computer viruses, and system overload as well as the loss of productivity from employees spending time playing games.14 It is the responsibility of managers to create a work environment that helps the company achieve its objectives and fulfill its responsibilities. However, the methods that managers use to enforce these responsibilities should not compromise employee rights. Organizational pressures may encourage a person to engage in activities that he or she might otherwise view as unethical, such as invading others privacy or stealing a competitors secrets. Or the firm may provide only vague or lax supervision on ethical issues, providing the opportunity for misconduct. Managers who offer no ethical direction to employees create many opportunities for manipulation, dishonesty, and conflicts of interest. Plagiarismtaking someone elses work and presenting it as your own without mentioning the sourceis another ethical issue. As a student, you may be familiar with plagiarism in school, for example, copying someone elses term paper or quoting from a published work without acknowledging it. In business, an ethical issue arises when an employee copies reports or takes the work or ideas of others and presents them as his or her own. A manager attempting to take credit for a subordinates ideas is engaging in another type of plagiarism. Several well-known musicians, including Michael Jackson, George Harrison, and Michael Bolton, have been accused of taking credit for the work of others.
plagiarism
the act of taking someone elses work and presenting it as your own without mentioning the source
38
Table 2.2
Questions to Consider in Determining Whether an Action Is Ethical
perceived importance of an ethical issue substantially affects choices, and only a few issues receive scrutiny, while most receive no attention at all.15 Table 2.2 lists some questions you may want to ask yourself and others when trying to determine whether an action is ethical. Open discussion of ethical issues does not eliminate ethical problems, but it does promote both trust and learning in an organization.16 When people feel that they cannot discuss what they are doing with their coworkers or superiors, there is a good chance that an ethical issue exists. Once a person has recognized an ethical issue and can openly discuss it with others, he or she has begun the process of resolving an ethical issue. Companies subcontracting manufacturing operations abroad are now aware of the ethical issues associated with supporting facilities that abuse and/or underpay their work forces. Such facilities have been termed sweatshops. Maximizing profits is often the motivation behind a companys decision to utilize sweatshops. For each $14.99 pair of J.C. Penney Arizona jeans, workers earn 11 cents. For each $12.00 Victorias Secret garment made, employees earn 3 cents. Wal-Mart, Kmart, and Nike also have been accused by the US National Labor Committee of outsourcing production to countries with low wages to boost profitability.17 New codes of conduct have been established to assist companies in identifying and addressing these ethical issues. Ethical decisions involve questions about how we ought to behave. The decision process must consider cultural and religious background. A review of the literature will reveal many possible frameworks for making ethical and moral decisions, but all will consider the matter relative to those standards held important by the decision maker. Such traits as honesty, compassion, and fairness, as well as the individuals sense of right and wrong, will play an important part. One five-step framework published by the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics is: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Recognize a moral issue. Get the facts. Evaluate the alternative actions from various moral perspectives. Make a decision. Act, then reflect on the decision later.
Chapter 2
39
Ethical decisions in an organization are influenced by three key factors: individual moral standards, the influence of managers and coworkers, and the opportunity to engage in misconduct (Figure 2.1). While you have great control over your personal ethics outside the workplace, your coworkers and management team exert significant control over your choices at work through authority and example. In fact, the activities and examples set by coworkers, along with rules and policies established by the firm, are critical in gaining consistent ethical compliance in an organization. If the company fails to provide good examples and direction for appropriate conduct, confusion and conflict will develop and result in the opportunity for misconduct. If your boss or coworkers leave work early, you may be tempted to do so as well. If you see coworkers making personal long-distance phone calls at work and charging them to the company, then you may be more likely to do so also. In addition, having sound personal values contributes to an ethical workplace. It is difficult for employees to determine what conduct is acceptable within a company if the firm does not have ethics policies and standards. And without such policies and standards, employees may base decisions on how their peers and superiors behave. Professional codes of ethics are formalized rules and standards that describe what a company expects of its employees. The Ethics Officer Association is a professional association of top managers in 500 companies who have responsibility for developing ethical policies and programs for their organizations, with members based in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Great Britain, India, Japan, Switzerland, and the United States. Codes of ethics, policies on ethics, and ethics training programs advance ethical behaviour because they prescribe which activities are acceptable and which are not, and they limit the opportunity for misconduct by providing punishments for violations of the rules and standards. The enforcement of such codes and policies through rewards and punishments increases the acceptance of ethical standards by employees. Enforcement of ethics policies is a common way of dealing with ethical problems. A survey by the US Ethics Resource Center on attitudes toward and knowledge of ethics and ethics programs indicated that employees personal ethics improve when their organization has a comprehensive ethics training program. In addition, the study found that individuals in companies that have ethics training programs believe that their business ethics have improved during the course of their careers.18 These findings suggest that people do bring a set of personal values into an organization, and, further, that organizational pressures affect not only how individuals conduct themselves within the organization but also can improve their personal ethics outside of work. The Conference Board of Canada points out that having an ethics program is not only part of being a socially responsible corporation but is also likely to increase profitability. Lost sales, legal fees, and fines, and the demoralization of the work force resulting from unethical behaviour can be very costly. In an effort to avoid such costs, many Canadian organizations are implementing ethics programs to ensure that employee behaviour is in accordance with corporate values and relevant legislation.19
codes of ethics
formalized rules and standards that describe what a company expects of its employees
40
whistleblowing
the act of an employee exposing an employers wrongdoing to outsiders, such as the media or government regulatory agencies
Figure 2.2
Percentage of Employees Who Believe that Their Company Encourages Unethical Conduct
Source: Ethics Resource Center/Society for Human Resource Management, 1997 Business Ethics Survey Report, p. 19.
7% No, never Yes, frequently Yes, sometimes Yes, rarely Don't know 1% 9% 16%
67%
Chapter 2
41
ganizational values. Organizations recognize that effective business ethics programs are good for business performance. Firms that develop higher levels of trust function more efficiently and effectively and avoid damaged company reputations and product images. Organizational ethics initiatives have been supportive of many positive and diverse organizational objectives, such as profitability, hiring, employee satisfaction, and customer loyalty.20
Figure 2.3
The Pyramid of Social Responsibility
Voluntary Responsibilities being a "good corporate citizen"; contributing to the community and quality of life Ethical Responsibilities being ethical; doing what is right, just, and fair; avoiding harm Legal Responsibilities obeying the law (society's codification of right and wrong); playing by the rules of the game Economic Responsibilities being profitable
Source: Adapted from Archie B. Carroll, The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Reprinted from Business Horizons 34 (July/August 1991), p. 42. Copyright 1991 by the Foundation for the School of Business at Indiana University. Used with permission.
42
Table 2.3
The Arguments For and Against Social Responsibility
For: 1. Business helped to create many of the social problems that exist today, so it should play a significant role in solving them, especially in the areas of pollution reduction and cleanup. 2. Businesses should be more responsible because they have the financial and technical resources to help solve social problems. 3. As members of society, businesses should do their fair share to help others. 4. Socially responsible decision making by businesses can prevent increased government regulation. 5. Social responsibility is necessary to ensure economic survival: If businesses want educated and healthy employees, customers with money to spend, and suppliers with quality goods and services in years to come, they must take steps to help solve the social and environmental problems that exist today. Against: 1. It sidetracks managers from the primary goal of businessearning profits. Every dollar donated to social causes or otherwise spent on societys problems is a dollar less for owners and investors. 2. Participation in social programs gives businesses greater power, perhaps at the expense of particular segments of society. 3. Some people question whether business has the expertise needed to assess and make decisions about social problems. 4. Many people believe that social problems are the responsibility of government agencies and officials, who can be held accountable by voters.
Chapter 2
43
firms relations with employees, government regulators, owners, suppliers, customers, and the community. Table 2.4 shows companies currently held in a socially responsible stock fund. The criteria for inclusion: quality goods and services, equitable employee and community relations, and care for the environment. A recent survey carried out on behalf of Canadian Business for Social Responsibility found: Canadians have high expectations for the financial and investment community to use corporate sustainability reports when making investment decisions. Canadian shareholders strongly believe that the investment community should be taking corporate environmental and social performance into account when valuing companies. There is strong interest among shareholders to learn more about the corporate social and environmental performance of the companies they currently invest in. Very few shareholders believe that their investment portfolio is made up of socially irresponsible companies. Over one in five shareholders report having their investment decisions influenced by corporate social performance, and one in five appear to be serious about socially responsible investing.24 Social responsibility is a dynamic area with issues changing constantly in response to societys desires. There is much evidence that social responsibility is associated with improved business performance. Consumers are refusing to buy from businesses that receive publicity about misconduct. A number of studies have found a direct relationship between social responsibility and profitability, as well as that social responsibility is linked to employee commitment and customer loyaltymajor concerns of any firm trying to increase profits.25 This section highlights a few of the many social responsibility issues that managers face; as managers become aware of and work toward the solution of current social problems, new ones will certainly emerge.
Table 2.4
Top Ten Holdings of the Ethical Canadian Equity Fund
Source: www.ethicalfunds. com
44
Employee Relations
Another issue of importance to a business is its responsibilities to employees, for without employees a business cannot carry out its goals. Employees expect businesses to provide a safe workplace, pay them adequately for their work, and tell them what is happening in their company. They want employers to listen to their grievances and treat them fairly. Each of the ten provinces, three territories, and the federal government has its own Occupational Health and Safety Regulations enacted to protect workers. Labour unions have also made significant contributions to achieving safety in the workplace and improving wages and benefits. Most organizations now recognize that the safety and satisfaction of their employees are critical ingredients in their success, and many strive to go beyond what is expected of them by the law. Healthy, satisfied employees supply more than just labour to their employers, however. Employers are beginning to realize the importance of obtaining input from even the lowest-level employees to help the company reach its objectives. A major social responsibility for business is providing equal opportunities for all employees regardless of their sex, age, race, religion, or nationality. Women and minorities have been slighted in the past in terms of education, employment, and advancement opportunities; additionally, many of their needs have not been addressed by business. For example, women, who continue to bear most child-rearing responsibilities, often experience conflict between those responsibilities and their duties as employees. Consequently, day care has become a major employment issue for women, and more companies are providing day-care facilities as part of their effort to recruit and advance women in the work force. In addition, companies are considering alternative scheduling such as flex-time and job sharing to accommodate employee concerns. Telecommuting has grown significantly over the past 5 to 10 years, as well. Many Canadians and Americans today believe business has a social obligation to provide special opportunities for women and minorities to improve their standing in society.
Consumer Relations
A critical issue in business today is businesss responsibility to customers, who look to business to provide them with satisfying, safe products and to respect their rights as consumers. The activities that independent individuals, groups, and organizations undertake to protect their rights as consumers are known as consumerism. To achieve their objectives, consumers and their advocates write letters to companies, lobby government agencies, make public service announcements, and boycott companies whose activities they deem irresponsible. Some consumers have aggressively boycotted Home Depot for selling old growth ancient redwoods and other oldforest products. As the largest home improvement retailer, Home Depot is also the largest reseller of such products, even though it manufactures none of the products it sells in its stores.26 Other companies, such as 3M and Mitsubishi, have stringent policies on the purchase of such materials.
consumerism
the activities that independent individuals, groups, and organizations undertake to protect their rights as consumers
Chapter 2
45
In July 1996, Sunbeam hired Albert Dunlap (known as Chainsaw Al) as chairman and CEO to try to save the company and increase declining stock values and profits. Dunlap is known for making extreme cuts in all areas of operations, including massive layoffs, to streamline business. The concepts of teamwork and group dynamics are unknown to Dunlap. He even authored a book, Mean Business, that states that making money for shareholders is the most important goal of any business. Increasing shareholder wealth, at any cost, is his objective. Clearly, his philosophy is deficient in regard to ethical responsibility. The day Dunlap was hired, Sunbeams stock jumped 49 percent. True to his reputation, Chainsaw Al fired thousands of employees, shut down factories and warehouses, and streamlined the company by eliminating products and selling businesses unrelated to its core products. He even attained his objective and made money for shareholders. However, the wealth did not last. In April 1998, Sunbeam announced a first-quarter loss, and stock prices fell by 25 percent. Dunlap realized his reputation and Rambo-style cuts were not going to maintain the high stock prices or profits at Sunbeam. His solution was to shift sales from future quarters to the current one by using a bill and hold strategy, which involves selling products to retailers for large discounts and holding them in third-party warehouses to be delivered at a later date. By booking sales months prior to the ac-
Consider Ethics and Social Responsibility Chainsaw Als Mean Business at Sunbeam
Many of the desires of those involved in the consumer movement have a foundation in US president John F. Kennedys 1962 consumer bill of rights, which highlighted four rights. The right to safety means that a business must not knowingly sell anything that could result in personal injury or harm to consumers. Defective or dangerous products erode public confidence in the ability of business to serve society. They also result in expensive litigation that ultimately increases the cost of products for all consumers. The right to be informed gives consumers the freedom to review complete information about a product before they buy. This means that detailed in-
46
Environmental Issues
Environmental responsibility has become a leading issue in the last decade as both business and the public acknowledge the damage done to the environment in the past. Todays consumers are increasingly demanding that businesses take a greater responsibility for their actions and their impact on the environment. Animal Rights. One area of environmental concern in society today is animal rights. Probably the most controversial business practice in this area is the testing of cosmetics and drugs on animals who may be injured or killed as a result. Animal-rights activists, such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, say such research is morally wrong because it harms living creatures. Consumers who share this sentiment may boycott companies that test products on animals and take their business instead to companies such as The Body Shop and John Paul Mitchell Systems, which do not use animal testing. However, researchers in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries argue that animal testing is necessary to prevent harm to human beings who will eventually use the products. Business practices that harm endangered wildlife and their habitats are another environmental issue. The use of fur for luxury coats has been controversial for many years. In Canada, the Hudsons Bay Company sold their Northern stores and fur auction business in 1985, 313 years after their first public fur auction. In New York, the Animal Defense League (ADL) has protested Macys sale of fur coats. The ADL claims that more than 40 million animals are killed each year for their fur.28 Pollution. Another major issue in the area of environmental responsibility is pollution. According to Laura Jones, an economist from British Columbia, Atlantic fisheries can avoid further ecological and economic disasters by switching to a property rights style of management. Ms. Jones points out that the switch to property rights-based management resulted in the recovery of the BC Halibut fishery which was on the edge of collapse in the 1990s, and turned it into the thriving, viable fishery it had become by 2003. Property rights-based management is a system of individual transferable quotas in contrast to the current efforts-based system of ever shorter seasons and equipment restrictions which is employed in the Atlantic fisheries in an effort to control the fishermens success at catching fish. Ms. Jones cites the BC experience as showing that this type of management improves conservation efforts, economic viability, and health and safety records. Under this system, fishermen own the quota and as a business asset they desire to protect its value. The result is that people in the BC industry say they now think of themselves as custodians of the fishery, not simply miners of the sea.29 It is argued by resource economists that such property rights and the resulting custodial approach encourage protection of the environment as pollution impacts the value of that which is owned.
Chapter 2
47
Water pollution results from dumping toxic chemicals and raw sewage into rivers and oceans, oil spills, and the burial of industrial waste in the ground where it may filter into underground water supplies. Fertilizers and insecticides used in farming and grounds maintenance also run off into water supplies with each rainfall. Water pollution problems are especially notable in heavily industrialized areas. In May of 2000 the water supply of Walkerton, Ontario, was contaminated with E. coli bacteria. The result was the death of seven people and 2,300 were made ill. The suspected cause of the contamination was untreated manure from a dairy farm being carried into a municipal well by spring runoff. It should be noted that a judicial inquiry held that no regulations were broken by the farmer. As a result of such occurrences, society is demanding that regulations be enacted and enforced to safeguard clean, healthful water supplies. The inquiry resulted in 93 recommendations of which 50 were included in the Ontario Safe Drinking Water Act of 2002.30 Air pollution is usually the result of smoke and other pollutants emitted by manufacturing facilities, as well as carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons emitted by motor vehicles. In addition to the health risks posed by air pollution, when some chemical compounds emitted by manufacturing facilities react with air and rain, acid rain results. Acid rain has contributed to the deaths of many valuable forests and lakes in North America as well as in Europe. Air pollution may also contribute to the so-called greenhouse effect, in which carbon dioxide collects in the earths atmosphere, trapping the suns heat and preventing the earths surface from cooling. Chlorofluorocarbons also harm the earths ozone layer, which filters out the suns harmful ultraviolet light; this too may be a cause of the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect is highly controversial, however, and some scientists doubt its existence. Royal Dutch/Shell Group, parent company of Shell Oil, plans to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 10 percent over the next three years. Shell plans to spend US$500 million over the next five years to develop renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power.31 Land pollution is tied directly to water pollution because many of the chemicals and toxic wastes that are dumped on the land eventually work their way into the water supply. Land pollution results from the dumping of residential and industrial waste, strip mining, forest fires, and poor forest conservation. Manufacturers in the United States produce approximately 45 million tonnes of contaminants each year. The dumping of toxic wastes in Love Canal (near Niagara Falls, New York) caused later residents to experience high rates of birth defects and cancer before they were forced by the US government to abandon their homes in the late 1970s and early 1980s. In Brazil and other South American countries, rain forests are being destroyedat a rate of nearly half a hectare per minuteto make way for farms and ranches, at a cost of the extinction of the many animals and plants (some endangered species) that call the rain forest home. Large-scale deforestation also depletes the oxygen supply available to humans and other animals. In Sydney, Nova Scotia, 80 years of coke-oven operation in the area known as Muggah Creek have left ground and surface water seriously contaminated with arsenic, lead, and other toxins. It has left an accumulation, in an area the size of three city blocks now called the Tar Ponds, of some 70,000 tonnes of chemical waste and raw sewage, 40,000 tonnes of which are carcinogenic PCBs. Residents of the area reported that an orange goo would seep into their basements and that puddles would turn fluorescent green after a rainfall. They have also complained of numerous health problems, including massive headaches, nosebleeds, and respiratory problems. Today the area has one of the highest rates of cancer, birth defects, and miscarriages in Canada. Efforts at cleaning up the Sydney Tar Ponds were initiated with $34.4 million in government funding in 1986. After 15 years, the problem remains unsolved,
48
Chapter 2
49
The Ethics in Action Awards recognize businesses, and individuals in business, whose actions and decisions have made a positive impact on our communities.
Source: 2003 Ethics in Action Awards. Retrieved from www. ethicsinaction. com.
Community Relations
A final, yet very significant, issue for businesses concerns their responsibilities to the general welfare of the communities and societies in which they operate. Many businesses simply want to make their communities better places for everyone to live and work. Although such efforts cover many diverse areas, some actions are especially noteworthy. As one example, the RBC Financial Group donated $37 million to charities in 2003, almost half of which went to education and health worldwide. In 2002, a similar amount was donated with $27.4 million donated in Canada and $9.7 million donated internationally. RBC is the largest corporate supporter of the United Way in Canada with corporate donations of $2.7 million and employee donations of about $5.75 million. In addition to cash donations, RBC lends employees to the United Way each year. In 2002, 18 RBC employees were on loan to the United Way.35 The smaller TD Bank Financial Group is no less committed to community support with $20 million donated to charities, $4.17 million gifts-in-kind donations, $2 million in charitable sponsorships, and support for numerous scholarship and literacy projects including the donation of 450,000 books to children and $1.34 million set aside for use in scholarships and bursaries.36 Both banks proudly point out that their employees, with corporate support, devote tens of thousands of hours to volunteer work. Suncor Energy follows a policy of donating 1 percent of pretax profits to charitable efforts, predominantly through its Suncor Energy Foundation. In 2002, the foundation disbursed $4.4 million to 265 Canadian charitable organizations bringing its total donations since 1998 to almost $15 million. In 2002, about one-third of the Foundations giving was directed toward educational projects.37
50
Table 2.5
Corporate Philanthropy by Area of Support
Source: Based on 1997 Corporate Community Investment in Canada, conducted by the Canadian Centre for Business in the Community, as reported in Taking Action on Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility, at www2.conferenceboard.ca/ ccbc/knowledge-areas/csr/ csroct98.htm.
Home Depot excels at strategic philanthropy. It has a close relationship with Habitat for Humanity, donating products and employee time to assist in the organizations building efforts. Minute Maid Company, a division of Coca-Cola, produces 2,000 cases of Hi-C drink for Second Harvest, a charitable hunger relief organization.38 Average contributions by Canadian corporations grew by 20 percent from 1995 to 1997. The largest proportion of these contributions was received by education, followed by social services and health care. Table 2.5 shows the complete breakdown of support by area. That education is viewed as important by corporate Canada is evidenced by the fact that in 2000 over 15,000 Canadian organizations applied for Conference Board of Canada Awards for: business education partnerships; youth employment; workplace literacy/business skills upgrading; and corporate leadership.
The winning projects benefit both the organization investing in education and the community. By developing employability skills, entrepreneurship, and literacy, a more productive work force is created. This results in higher productivity and greater economic welfare for all Canadians. Many of the winners of these awards are ranked among Canadas most productive companies.39 Business is also beginning to take more responsibility for the hard-core unemployed. Some are mentally or physically handicapped; some are homeless. Others are members of traditionally disadvantaged social or racial groups. Over 20,000 North American Indians, Metis, and Inuit in Canada operate their own businesses. While the majority are profitable, they lag behind the Canadian average. The corporate members of the Council on Corporate-Aboriginal Relations established by the Conference Board of Canada work with Aboriginal businesses to improve capacity, management skills, and technical training, and to provide greater opportunity for expansion. This is accomplished through mentoring programs such as that provided by Syncrude Canada. Syncrude executives have built successful relationships by communicating their business requirements to Aboriginal firms and by making their executives available as business mentors, providing management expertise and training.40 To promote ethics and social responsibility around the globe, the Caux Round Table, a group of business, political, and civic leaders in Europe, Japan, and the United States, created international principles related to responsible corporate citizenship. The role of business in the lives of customers, employees, owners, competitors, suppliers, and communities was communicated in clear terms. International codes allow businesses to confidently adjust their practices to accommodate cultural, social, and ethical differences in international business.
Chapter 2
51
52
Get Involved
1. Discuss some recent examples of businesses engaging in unethical practices. Classify these practices as issues of conflict of interest, fairness and honesty, communications, or business relationships. Why do you think the businesses chose to behave unethically? What actions might the businesses have taken? 2. Discuss with your class some possible methods of improving ethical standards in business. Do you think that business should regulate its own activities or that the federal government should establish and enforce ethical standards? How do you think businesspeople feel? 3. Find some examples of socially responsible businesses in newspapers or business journals. Explain why you believe their actions are socially responsible. Why do you think the companies chose to act as they did?
Chapter 2
53
4
Mini-Case For several months now, one of your colleagues has been slacking off, and you are getting stuck doing the work. You think it is unfair. What do you do? Potential Answers A. Recognize this as an opportunity for you to demonstrate how capable you are. B. Go to your supervisor and complain about this unfair workload. C. Discuss the problem with your colleague in an attempt to solve the problem without involving others. D. Discuss the problem with the human resources department.
7
Mini-Case You are aware that a fellow employee uses drugs on the job. Another friend encourages you to confront the person instead of informing the supervisor. What do you do? Potential Answers A. You speak to the alleged user and encourage him to get help. B. You elect to tell your supervisor that you suspect an employee is using drugs on the job. C. You confront the alleged user and tell him either to quit using drugs or you will turn him in. D. Report the matter to employee assistance.
36
Mini-Case You work for a company that has implemented a policy of a smoke-free environment. You discover employees smoking in the restrooms of the building. You also smoke and dont like having to go outside to do it. What do you do? A. B. C. D. Potential Answers You ignore the situation. You confront the employees and ask them to stop. You join them, but only occasionally. You contact your ethics or human resources representative and ask him or her to handle the situation.
40
Mini-Case Your coworker is copying company-purchased software and taking it home. You know a certain program costs $400, and you have been saving for a while to buy it. What do you do? A. B. C. D. Potential Answers You figure you can copy it too since nothing has ever happened to your coworker. You tell your coworker he cant legally do this. You report the matter to the ethics office. You mention this to your supervisor.
54
www.cbc.ca
chemical inputs are used. The price of chemical fertilizers is also prohibitive. Therefore, almost 40 percent of the cooperatives on the FLO register were either certified organic or in the process of becoming certified as of February 2001. Only about 22 percent of the 78.7 million kilograms of coffee produced by the FLO-registered cooperatives in 1999 was sold through Fair Trade. However, the small growers also benefit from the direct access to world markets that the cooperatives provide. This marginal increase in income when combined with the more profitable Fair Trade sales has a disproportionate economic impact on the growers. The cooperative also lowers production costs by recycling wastes into low-cost organic fertilizers, which in turn produces higher incomes for the growers and at the same time improves environmental stewardship. Higher incomes allow the small growers to reinvest in their farms, to provide better nutrition and housing for their families, and through cooperativefunded schools, to provide more educational opportunities for their children. These benefits accrue even though Fair Tradecertified sales in Canada, as in other countries, represent only a small but growing proportion of the total coffee market. Questions 1. Is it the responsibility of coffee consumers to ensure that the small producers receive a fair price for their product? Why or why not? 2. If the price paid to the grower represents only 10 percent of the retail price of coffee, why is the retail price of Fair Trade coffee approximately double the regular price? 3. Who benefits the most from the higher price paid by consumers for Fair Trade labelled coffee? 4. What alternative approach to the problem of poverty among small producers can you suggest? Source: Marketplace, show number 61221859077, Coffee, February 15, 2000, running time 13:36.
Remember to check out our Online Learning Centre at www.mcgrawhill.ca/college/ferrell to view these videos, related cases and questions to test your knowledge.