Modelling of Textile Structure For Advanced Applications
Modelling of Textile Structure For Advanced Applications
=
integer even an is if 0
integer odd an is if 1
, 1
i
i
W
y
(1)
where y = ; and 1 s is N to 1
1 1
= =
|
|
.
|
\
|
+
i
j
j i
i
j
j
F F F
f
. N
f
is the number of floats in the float arrangement. Then,
the rest of the matrix will be assigned values as follows:
W
x, z
= W
1, y
(2)
where
( ) | | ( ) | | { }
( ) | | ( ) | | { }
( ) | | ( ) | | { }
> + +
s + s +
< + + +
=
; 1 if 1
; 1 1 if 1
; 1 1 if 1
p p
p
p
R x S y R x S y
R x S y x S y
x S y R x S y
z 2 s x s R
e
; and 1 s y s R
p
.
Chen and colleagues also worked on weaves for other 2D fabrics and 3D fabrics [3] [4].
3. Geometrical modelling of woven fabrics
The performance of a textile fabric is basically a function of the property of the constituent fibres/yarns,
and the geometrical construction of the fibres/yarns in the fabrics. Study on the geometry of fabrics has been
continuing for almost a century. Geometrical models of fabrics have led to the estimation of some structural
and physical properties of the fabrics, such as the areal mass and the porosity, and the results from the
modelling have been used as guidance to fabric manufacture in giving the maximum areal density of the
fabrics. Geometrical modelling of textile assemblies becomes more important nowadays as the geometrical
models are, arguably, the most reliable solution in providing geometrical information of the textile
assemblies for finite element (FE) analysis for performance simulation.
Peirces work in 1937 [5] is regarded as the beginning of modelling woven fabric geometries. Under
certain assumptions including circular yarn cross-section, complete flexibility of yarns, incompressible yarns
and arc-line-arc yarn path, he derived the following equations describing the geometry of the plain woven
fabrics. The cross-section of the plain woven fabric based on Peirces assumption is shown in Figure 5.
JIC email for subscription: publishing@WAU.org.uk
Xiaogang Chen, et al: Modelling of Textile Structure for Advanced Applications
74
Figure 5 Peirces model for the plain woven fabric
p e
d d D + =
(3) (4)
D h h
p e
= +
1 =
p
e
e
p
l
c
(5)
1 =
e
p
p
p
l
c
(6)
e e e
D
e p
D l p u u u sin cos ) + ( =
(7) (8)
p p p
D u u u sin cos ) +
p e
D l p ( =
) cos 1 ( sin ) (
e e e e e
D D l h u u u + = (9)
) cos 1 ( sin ) (
p p p p p
D D l h u u u + =
(10)
where
e
h
, - the modular heights of the warp and weft yarns normal to the neutral plane of the fabric
p
h
e
c , - the crimps of the warp and weft yarns
p
c
D -the sum of the diameters of the warp and weft yarns
e
d
, - the diameters of the warp and weft yarns
p
d
e
p
, - the thread spacing between adjacent warp and weft yarns
p
p
e
l
, - the modular lengths of the warp and weft yarns in one repeat
p
l
e
u
,
p
u
- the weaving angles of warp and weft yarns
Subscripts e and p in the variables above refers to warp (ends) and weft (picks) respectively.
There are thirteen variables in these eight equations. Therefore, with five variables known, such as the
two spacings ( , ), the two yarn diameters ( , ) and one crimp (either or ), these simultaneous
equations can be solved. Ai [6] presented an algorithm to calculate the geometry assuming that five
variables, , , , and one of and are specified. If , , , and are known, the other
fabric parameters can be worked out.
e
p
p
p
p
p
e
d
e
d p
d
e
c
p
p
c
e
c
e
p p
d
e
c
p
c
e
p p
p
e
d
d
The yarn cross-section in a real fabric is hardly circular because of the pressure between the war and
weft yarns during the weaving process. Peirce himself proposed an alternative model for the plain woven
fabric assuming the yarn cross-section to be elliptical. It proved to be mathematically too complicated to
describe the relationship among the structural parameters. Peirce model of plain woven fabrics was extended
by others notably Kemp [7] who assumed the yarn cross-section is racetrack shaped and Shanahan and
Hearle [8] who proposed a lenticular yarn-cross section. These extended models kept all assumptions Peirce
used except for the yarn cross-section, and are regarded as Peirce derivative models.
4. FE modelling of woven structures
Based on the achievements made in weave modelling and fabric geometric modelling, solid models for
different types of woven fabrics are created using the algorithm. For example, a programme called
UniverWeave was developed to create woven fabric geometrical models efficiently. The defined geometry
can be picked up by major FE software packages to carry out FE simulations for material and component
analysis.
4.1. FE modelling of filtration through fabrics
Since the geometry and porosity of the fabric filter is determined by the weave pattern and the various
JIC email for contribution: editor@jic.org.uk
Journal of Information and Computing Science, Vol. 5 (2010) No. 1, pp 071-080
75
parameters of yarns constituting the fabric [9], it is important to optimise its structure to achieve the most
efficient filtration. The past and current practice is to rely on the practical skill and experience of the fabric
designers and empirical trials. Readily available computational power provides an opportunity to develop
computer-aided design (CAD) procedures. CAD software would enable predictions of filter performance to
be made, leading to improved filters and reduced cost of trials. In the first stages of developing CAD
programs, it is necessary to produce good models of fabric structure and then predict the flow through the
fabrics.
Among the numerous outputs from the analysis, the fluid pressure, fluid velocity and shear stress on the
fabric are used as the performance indices [10]. Fluid pressure is read on the front face and the back face of
the filter fabric. Fluid velocity is taken on the planes that are one mesh size away before and after the filter
fabric and on the fabric centre (middle) plane. The shear stress, on the other hand, is measured at the front
side and inner-side of the yarns constituting the fabric. The fluid velocity and pressure through the chamber
are also simulated, which give an overall effect of the fabric filter on the fluid flow. Figure 6 shows the
positions where the data were extracted in relation with the fabric and to the direction of the flow.
Figure 6 Fabric in relation to planes before, middle, after, and through
In each analysis, 3 different fabric models (all plain) are used. Every fabric model is specified using warp
yarn linear density (t
1
), weft yarn linear density (t
2
), warp density (d
1
), weft density (d
2
), warp crimp (c
1
),
cross-sectional shape of the yarns and the Width to Height Ratio (WHR) of the yarn cross-section. Warp
crimp is then a dependent parameter. The inlet pressure for all cases is 3 bars and the operating pressure 1
bar. Density and viscosity of the fluid were assumed to be constant, corresponding to the isothermal
approach. Liquid-water was used as the Newtonian fluid (with density of 998.2 kg/m
3
and viscosity at 10
-3
kg/m.s). As an example, when the cross-section of the yarns in the filter fabrics are taking circular, racetrack
and lenticular shapes, Figure 7 summarises the effect of yarn cross-sectional shape on fluid pressure on the
front and back surfaces.
Figure 7 Effects of varying yarn cross-sectional shape on fluid pressure
In this experiment three rather ideal yarn cross-sectional shapes namely circular (FS4), racetrack (FS5)
and lenticular (FS6) shapes are investigated. From circular to racetrack to lenticular, the yarn width increases
as its height decreases. Figure 7 illustrates influence of variation of the yarn cross-sectional shape on fluid
pressure exerted to the front and back surfaces of the fabric. By changing yarn cross-sectional shapes from
circular to racetrack to lenticular, the fluid pressure is increased on the front face of the fabric due to higher
flow resistance and drops dramatically at the back face.
JIC email for subscription: publishing@WAU.org.uk
Xiaogang Chen, et al: Modelling of Textile Structure for Advanced Applications
4.2.
JIC email for contribution: editor@jic.org.uk
76
FE modelling of ballistic impact through fabrics
FE modelling of ballistic impact on fabrics is another field that is much needed in order to understand the
strain/stress distribution in each of the fabric layers and among all fabrics layers. Results from such work
provide guiding information for body armour engineering. Modelling of ballistic fabrics is carried out on two
levels, one a single layer of fabric, another layered panels of fabrics.
Figure 8 The geometrical model and constraints
Figure 8 is the geometric model of the fabric and the impacting projectile. A quarter of the fabric and
that of the projectile is considered because of symmetry, the fabric involved 8 warp and 8 weft yarns
constructed in the plain weave. This is a square fabric with the same value of warp and weft densities (7.6
threads/cm). The material type is Kevlar whose specific density is 1.55 g/cm
3
. The following describes the
boundary conditions For the projectile, the translational freedom along X and Y axes and the rotational
freedom along Z axis are constrained and set to zero, i. e., v
x
=v
y
=0. For the fabric, the translational freedom
perpendicular to the symmetrical plane and the rotational freedom in the symmetrical plane are constrained
and set to zero, i.e., U
x
=UR
y
=UR
z
=0 and U
y
=UR
x
=UR
z
=0. The circumference of the quarter of the target
fabric is fixed, i.e. U
x
=U
y
=U
z
=UR
x
=UR
y
=UR
z
=0.
460
470
480
490
500
510
520
460 470 480 490 500 510 520
Residual velocity - experiment (m/s)
R
e
s
i
d
u
a
l
v
e
l
o
c
i
t
y
-
s
i
m
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
/
s
)
Figure 9 Agreement between the model and experiment
Figure 10 Stress distribution on an impacted fabric at (a) t=0 s (b) t=0.75 s (c) t=1.37 s (d) t=5.25 s (e) t=6.0 s
and (f) t=8.12 s
Figure 9 shows that the modelled exit velocities agree well with the measured exit velocities, with the
Journal of Information and Computing Science, Vol. 5 (2010) No. 1, pp 071-080
77
correlation coefficient being 0.9939. With the models validated by the experimental data, a series of FE
simulation was carried out. Figure 10 reveals the ballistic impact process, with the projectile impact velocity
v0=494.217m/s.
It is clear in Figure 10 that the distribution of stress caused by the ballistic impact on the fabric is mainly
along the warp and weft yarns in the fabric before the projectile penetrates the fabric. This implies that the
currently used plain woven fabric may not be the most efficient construction for ballistic applications,
because such constructed fabric is unable to mobilise more areas of fabric to absorb the impact energy. To
improve the fabrics ability to absorb impact energy, fabrics with better yarn gripping have been designed and
manufactured. The test results confirmed the superiority of such fabrics.
475
480
485
490
495
500
505
510
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time t(s)
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
l
e
v
e
l
o
c
i
t
y
v
(
m
/
s
)
v=494.217
v=506.466
Figure 11 Modelled project velocity change due to impact
The models also give information that enhances understanding on of the impact process. Figure 11
shows the change of the projectile velocity due to the impact on the fabric. The curves for both cases
demonstrate similar trend. The curves indicate that the initial impact causes a sharp reduction of projectile
velocity before the fibres start to break at about 1 s into the impact. Projectile going through the fabric
further reduces its velocity. The penetration of the projectile for both cases seems to have taken place at
around 8 s.
2.10
2.11
2.17
2.24
2.14
2.12
2
2.05
2.1
2.15
2.2
2.25
32 32 34 36 37 40
Impact energy E(J)
E
n
e
r
g
y
a
b
s
o
r
b
e
d
b
y
f
a
b
r
i
c
E
(
J
)
Figure 12 Energy absorption vs. impact energy
Figure 12 reveals that for a given assembly of ballistic fabrics there exists an impact energy that relates
to the maximum energy absorption of the assembly of the fabrics. The impact energy is only a quarter of the
energy applied to the fabric assembly due to the geometrical symmetry of the projectile. Under this
circumstance, the fabric assembly absorb most of the energy at 36 J. This provides support to the use of V50
in ballistic test.
The results from simulating single layer fabrics are valuable information for fabric design so that the
fabric is more absorbent to impact energy. It is also important to consider how the fabric is used in the fabric
assembly. Obviously, different fabrics/materials can be used at different position in the assembly because the
impact action and reaction are different at different layer. Even if the same fabric is used, the fabric
orientation in the assembly will also matter as fabric orientation has a direct influence on the strain/stress
JIC email for subscription: publishing@WAU.org.uk
Xiaogang Chen, et al: Modelling of Textile Structure for Advanced Applications
78
distribution. Figure 13 (a), (b) and (c) shows that fabric layers with different orientation angle leads to better
impact energy absorption.
(a) A 2-layer assembly
(b) A 3-layer assembly
(c) A 3-layer assembly
Figure 13 Effect of fabric orientation on energy absorption
(a) Aligned 4-layer (b) Angled 4-layer
Figure 14 Stress distribution of the 4-layer fabric assembly
From Figure 13 demonstrates that up to 4 layers of fabrics, a more evenly aligned fabric assembly
absorbs the most of impact energy, and the aligned fabric assemblies are related to the least energy
JIC email for contribution: editor@jic.org.uk
Journal of Information and Computing Science, Vol. 5 (2010) No. 1, pp 071-080
JIC email for subscription: publishing@WAU.org.uk
79
tal results show the same trend.
ppens when a high velocity
so demonstrated that fabric assemblies with evenly
impact energy than the aligned fabric assembly.
9/1 and RT/COM/5/030. The author also appreciates the important
yaraj, Ali Zanarboland, Danmei Sun and Ying Wang as
d assistants.
xford: Woodhead publishing Ltd, 2009.
3D woven
1, No. 2): 356.
ications. Text. Res. J. 1999, 69(9): 648.
fabrics. J Text Inst. 2006, 97(1):
03.
lar threads. J. Text. Inst. 1958, 49: T44.
J. Text. Inst. 1978, 69(4): 92.
ure
0] M. A. Nazarboland, X. Chen, J. W. S. Hearle, R. Lydon, and M. Moss. Modelling and simulation of filtration
through woven media. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology. 2008, 20(3): 150-260.
absorption. Experimen
5. Conclusions
As an important field for modelling and simulation, this paper explained the technique developed by the
author for woven textiles. The weave modelling is a mathematical description where the weave is
parameterised. This technique has been adopted in CAD software for weave design. Geometrical modelling
is explained by adopting Peirce model. This work enables fabric models to be created and exported for
property analysis using the FE packages. Two examples were used to demonstrate the application of the
geometrical models. Through the filtration modelling, information was created giving the relationship
between the fabric geometry and the fluid behaviour passing through the fabrics. The second example is on
the performance of ballistic fabrics. The modelling lead to understanding what ha
rigid projectile impacts on a soft woven fabric. It al
angled orientation absorb more
6. Acknowledgement
The author thanks the EPSRC and the MOD/Dstl for the continued support in the research, in particular
for the two grants EP/G04282
contributions made by Andrew Ai, Pranut Poti
research students an
7. References
[1] X. Chen (Ed.). Modeliing and predicting textile behaviour. O
[2] X. Chen, R.T. Knox, D.F. McKenna, R.R. Mather. Automatic generation of weaves for the CAM of 2D and
textile structures. J. Text. Inst.. 1996, 87( Part
[3] X. Chen, P. Potiyaraj. CAD/CAM of the orthogonal and angle-interlock woven structures for industrial
appl
[4] X. Chen, H. Wang. Modelling and computer aided design of 3D hollow woven
79.
[5] F.T. Peirce. The Ggeometry of cloth structure. J. Text. Inst. 1937, 28: T45
[6] X. Ai. Geometrical modelling of woven and knitted fabrics for technical applications. MPhil Thesis, UMIST, 20
[7] A. Kemp. An extension of Peirce cloth geometry to the treatment of noncircu
[8] W.J. Shanahan, J.W.S. Hearle. An energy method for calculations in fabric mechanics, part II: examples of
application of the method to woven fabrics.
[9] S. Backer. The Relationship Between the Structural Geometry of Textile and Its Physical Properties, I: Literat
review. Text. Res. J. 1948, 18: 650-658.
[1
Xiaogang Chen, et al: Modelling of Textile Structure for Advanced Applications
JIC email for contribution: editor@jic.org.uk
80