E Detailing
E Detailing
E Detailing
Andre Bates
Pharmaceutical rep waits whilst doctor sees patients 10 - 40% Appointments cancelled or rescheduled Typical call <5 minutes Impact on Prescriptions (ROI) per rep not usually measured
2
Reps are the foot soldiers of selling to doctors. Methods changed very little in 20 years o Mud-at-the-wall approach o Has worked in the past Average 3 - 8 visits per day. 43% Of calls, rep fails to speak to doctor.
Health Warnings: e Does not simply equal use of the Internet Not all the benefits apply equally to all the models 5 of eDetailing
Potential Benefits Giving more control to the physicians Reducing sales force expenses without losing sales Allowing trackable interaction with physicians Allows sales rep to be more productive & effective Allows method to change product positioning Rep can make greater number of sales calls Increase strength of relationship between Rep/Dr Increases number of prescriptions written
5
We will start by defining each of the current models before comparing the options.
Telephonic Co-Browsing
The physician initiates the eDetailing session and has control over the timing of the call. The physician calls the sales rep or clicks a button on their computer or a Web site and this prompts the sales rep to call them. During the call, the physician and sales representative view a scripted online eDetail about the promoted product and have the opportunity to discuss any points from this or anything else the physician has questions about. This type of system grew out of virtual live (but became telephone rather than video based) and scripted and combines the best of both in a more cost-effective manner It can be delivered via a physician portal in some cases
10
Physician Portals Offer eDetailing Via Sponsorship, Surveys & Targeted Mails
Online physician communities via physician portals offer an opportunity to deliver pharmaceutical company messages to a specific audience of physicians. Such portals also provide a means for gathering physician views (e.g. via surveys). Was often used for delivering soft general marketing messages (e.g. via sponsorship of a disease area forum or an online CME module and/or sending targeted emails to selected physicians). Now being used to provide hard product specific messages (like traditional detailing) via incorporating Scripted eDetailing models
11
Companies can design and build their own eDetailing solutions e.g. 3M, Lilly both of which were telephonic co-browsing models Such a system would be installed with pre-selected physicians who would be invited to use it by pharmaceutical sales forces. The format can be any of the models already discussed from Virtual Live to Scripted to added modules to existing physician Web sites Other variants could include Call Me buttons installed on physicians desktop or appropriate physicians Web sites.
12
13
14
Move product positioning Increasing effectiveness of the detail Decreasing number of rep calls to get the prescriptions Increasing number of prescriptions (with valid measurement criteria) Decreasing sales force costs without losing effectiveness
15
New product entry Late stage of product life cycle New or innovative treatment option New element of scientific interest Pull from marketplace for information/data (when theres noise
in the market)
16
Rapid Awareness Building for New Indications Products At Last Phase Product Lifecycle
17
Launch
Patent expiry
Pre-Launch
TIME
18
Best for products at beginning of lifecycle or nearing maturity for reasons of: Complexity of message more easily communicated electronically Rational brand prescribing curve data
19
Plan Roll out Roll out based on areas according to highest ROI Physicians first
21
Get sales force buy-in Leverage current relationships so, if using virtual live, or telephonic co-browsing, use same sales reps with current Doctors. Maybe have certain days of the week when they do traditional and other days when they do live virtual eDetailing?
22
Implementing a Pilot
Implement pilot first with high volume/low brand prescribers for biggest win. Measure baseline prescribing, cost per call in the physicians targeted prior to beginning as well as a control group of physicians. Re-measure prescribing behaviour in both groups after 2 - 3 months of implementation: prescribing, length of sales calls, cost per call, ROI calculations. Check statistically significant differences in increases in prescribing.
23
24
25
26
Pharmaceutical company should calculate actual ROI. Assisted by independent third-party firm using Rx data. eDetailing vendor company should track interactions, time of day and who they are with, but not calculate ROI.
28
29
From Novartis US IPNI Case Study: Cost per traditional detail = = Cost per eDetail =
$58 per min x 2 mins $116 per traditional detail $ 14 per min x 10+ mins ($80-$150 per eDetail)
31
FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION
Started using virtual live eDetailing via iPNi After implementing the system shown, the calls (all Dr initiated) were tracked. Between 8am and 6pm - average detail 17.4 minutes. Between 6pm and 9pm - average detail 28.6 minutes. Average eDetailing call = 19 minutes. Therefore, this system increased detail length 9 times. In addition, reps were found to have at least 5 times the number of effective calls per day.
32
Scripted eDetailing
FOLLOWING IMPLEMENTATION
After implementing the system (Physicians Interactive), the calls (all Dr initiated) were tracked. Average eDetailing call = 10 minutes. Therefore, this system increased detail length 5 times. No difference in benefits between Web or IVR phone for eDetailing i.e. type of technology not as relevant as content and incentives. New prescription market share increased from 3.2% to 9.8%.
34
36
Product early - mid lifecycle Crowded market Declining market New indication to be communicated but no increase in sales force possible
37
38
39
PROGRAM DESIGN An eDetail was created to meet the objectives. Recruitment was via direct email invitation via third party; a doctors portal and a detailing company implemented this A USB phone charger was given as an incentive. Additional recruitment was via Online Banner Advertisements via other targeted third parties; Offline Mailing to 9,000 GPs (~20 % of UK total) and nurses, and Cards were also distributed by contract sales force.
40
Case Study:
COST-EFFICIENCY
Physicians in a more cost-effective manner than rep visits (less than 130)
COSTS Design and development ...................... Recruitment ....................................... TOTAL ............................................... Costs per started eDetail ..................... Costs per completed eDetail .................. Cost of a sales reps visit - UK .................. RESULT:
The costs were 75.4% LESS than the cost of a rep per visit. The goal of reaching these Physicians costeffectively compared to rep visits had been met.
41
Case Study:
SHARE OF VOICE
4 Minutes and 5 seconds per eDetail gave a total of 9,200 brand exposure minutes per eDetail. Based on the assumption that each rep produces around 770 visits per annum, with the same length of visit (4.08 minutes) yielding 3144.17 brand exposure minutes. The eDetail generated this result in a time span of 2 weeks. Assuming that there are 44 weeks of detailing in a year, one sales rep is getting 71.5 minutes of brand exposure per week. So, in a 2 week period, 1 sales rep is getting 142.9 minutes brand exposure. Now, in this case study, 9,200 minutes of brand exposure was achieved in 2 weeks, which is the equivalent brand exposure of 64.4 sales reps FTE in that time period. RESULT: The eDetail achieved the equivalent of having an additional 64.4 sales reps FTE for that 2 week period of the eDetail.
42
Copyright 2009 Eularis
Case Study:
Quantitative Objective 3:
Sales Increase was 23.9% for the brand in the 3 months following the eDetailing
but how do we prove that was from the eDetailing? Match a test and control group prior to starting: List of respondents post-codes matched to IMS practices (Test Group) Matched practices
Groups of control practices identified (Study Group) Close to sample practices at least within same PCO Similar size practices health center/number of GPs
So, we could compare matched practices that had: no eDetail and no rep visits, a rep visit only, an eDetail only, both an eDetail and a rep visit combined with no cross-over for maximum statistical validity.
Copyright 2009 Eularis
43
RESULT: eDetailing produces 43% increase in NRx value per practice above baseline and 71% NRx value per practice when combined with rep activity, when separated out from other activity.
Copyright 2009 Eularis
44
REMEMBER
46
2 eDetails
0%
5%
Control
Month
47
Refine target audience from previous waves. Customise key messages on each deployment to meets target needs. Tie proxy responses to segmentation.
48
49
Eularis Removing Uncertainty from Pharma Marketing ROI URL: http://www.eularis.com Email: abates@eularis.com
50
Copyright 2009 Eularis