India 1900 to 1947

History Learning Site > Modern World History > India 1900 to 1947
Search Site:
In 1900, India was part of the British Empire; but by the end of 1947, <>
India had achieved independence.
Related Pages
Online For most of the Nineteenth Century, India was ruled by the British.
College India was considered the jewel in the crown of the British Empire. • Lord Louis
and Queen Victoria had been made Empress of India and the British had Mountbatte
University a major military presence in India. n
Degree • Chester
Guide Indian nationals had no say in central government and even at a Nimitz
local level, their influence on policy and decision making was • Vice
minimal. Admiral
Jisaburo
In 1885, educated middle class nationals had founded the Indian Ozawa
National Conference (INC). Their aim was to get a much greater • Erwin
say in the way India was governed. Rommel
• General
In response to this development, the Morley-Minto reforms were
Alexander
introduced in 1909. Morley was the Secretary of State for India and
Vandegrift
Lord Morley was Viceroy of India. Their reforms lead to each
province in India having its own governor and Indian nationals were • Georgy
allowed to sit on the councils which advised these governors. Zhukov
• The Phoney
After 1918, nationalism within India intensified. This was probably War
due to 2 reasons: • The Battle
of the River
1. Many educated nationals in India were far from satisfied with the Plate
Morley-Minto reforms. White Englishmen still dominated India and
 • U-boats
there had been no real decrease in their power or increase in
national power. The INC (Indian National Council) wanted a lot • The
more. Bismarck

2. Woodrow Wilson had stimulated the minds of many people with

his belief in national self-determination – i.e. that people from a
country had a right to govern themselves. The whole concept of
national self-determination undermined the basic idea of the British
Empire – that the British governed this empire (or people appointed
by the British to do the same). For national self-determination to fully
work, India would have to be governed by the Indians living there.

As early as 1917, Britain had toyed with the idea of giving India a
measure of self-government: "the gradual development of self-
governing institutions with a view to the progressive realisation of
responsible government in India as an integral part of the British
Empire".

In 1919, the Government of India Act was introduced.

This introduced a national parliament with two houses for India.

About 5 million of the wealthiest Indians were given the right to vote
(a very small percentage of the total population)
Within the provincial governments, ministers of education, health
and public works could now be Indian nationals
A commission would be held in 1929, to see if India was ready for
more concessions/reforms.

However, the British controlled all central government and within the
provincial governments, the British kept control of the key posts of
tax and law and order.

Many Tory MP’s in Britain were against the whole idea of giving
anything whatsoever to India in terms of self-government. They had
two complaints about the whole idea:

1. If you gave India some form of self-rule, where would it end?

2. Would it start the process that would lead to the break-up of the
British Empire?

The reforms were introduced very slowly and their spread

throughout such a large country was equally as slow. This angered
many as there was a general belief that the British were deliberately
stalling on introducing these reforms to ensure their continued
supremacy in India.

Riots did break out and the most infamous was at Amritsar in the
Punjab where 379 unarmed protesters were shot dead by British
soldiers based there. 1200 were injured. This incident shocked
many in India but what caused equal outrage was the British
reaction to Amritsar – the officer commanding British troops at
Amritsar, General Dyer, was simply allowed to resign his
commission after an inquiry criticised his leadership during the riot.
Many national Indians felt that he, and others in the army, had got
away very lightly. The more radical Indians felt that the British
government had all but sanctioned murder.

As a result of Amritsar, many Indians rushed to join the INC and it

very quickly became the party of the masses.

"After Amritsar, no matter what compromises and concessions the British

might suggest, British rule would ultimately be swept away."

The most vocal opponent of the idea of some form of self-rule for
India was Lord Birkenhead whole was Secretary of State for India
from 1924 to 1928. With such an opponent, any move to self-rule
was very difficult at best, and probably impossible in reality.

In India, the 1920’s saw the emergence of three men who were to
have a huge impact on the future of India:

Jawaharlal Nehru

Mahatma Gandhi

Muhammed Jinnah

Gandhi persuaded many of his followers to use non-violent protests.

They had sit-down strikes, they refused to work, they refused to pay
their taxes etc. If the British reacted in a heavy-handed manner, it
only made the British look worse; essentially, the British would come
across as bullies enforcing their rule on the bullied. However, there
were those in India who wanted to use more extreme measures.

Part of the 1919 Government of India Act stated that a commission

would be established after 10 years to assess whether India
could/should have more self-rule. This first met in 1928 – the Simon
Commission.

This commission reported in 1930. There were no Indians on the

commission. It proposed self-government for the provinces but
nothing else. This was unacceptable for the INC, which wanted
dominion status, granted immediately.

During the time the Simon Commission reported, Gandhi started his
second civil disobedience campaign. This included Gandhi
deliberately breaking the law. The law in India stated that only the
government could manufacture salt. After a 250-mile march to the
sea, Gandhi started to produce his own salt. This produced a violent
clash with the British authorities and Gandhi was arrested.

At this time, a sympathetic Viceroy to India had been appointed –

Lord Irwin. He believed that India should have dominion status – and
he publicly expressed this idea. Irwin pushed for the issue to be
discussed. He organised two Round Table conferences in 1930 and
1931. They were both held in London.

The first conference failed as no INC members were present. Most

were in Indian prisons. Irwin pushed for their release and he
persuaded Gandhi to travel to Britain to take part in the second
conference. Despite this development, the conference achieved little
as it broke down over an issue that was to haunt India in future
years – religion. Those present at the second conference, argued
and failed to agree over what the representation of Muslims would
be in an independent Indian parliament.

In 1935, the Government of India Act was introduced. Britain, at

this time, had a National Government and progress was made over
India purely because Stanley Baldwin, the Tory leader, and Ramsey-
MacDonald, the Labour leader, agreed on a joint course of action.
Winston Churchill was bitterly opposed to it. The Act introduced:

An elected Indian assembly to have a say in everything in India

except defence and foreign affairs.
The eleven provincial assemblies were to have effective full control
over local affairs.

The nationalists in India were not satisfied with this as the act did not
introduce dominion status and white dominions were allowed to
control their own defence and foreign policies. Also the princes who
still ruled areas of India still refused to co-operate with the provincial
assemblies so the second strand of the Act would have been
meaningless.

The act’s major failing was that it ignored the religious rivalry
between the Muslims and Hindus. Nearly two-thirds of India’s
population were Hindus and the Muslims feared that in an
independent and democratic India they would be treated unfairly. In
the 1937 provincial elections, the Hindus, who dominated the
Congress Party under Nehru, won eight out of the eleven provinces.
The Muslim League under Jinnah demanded a separate state of
their own to be called Pakistan. Both Gandhi and the Congress
Party were determined to preserve Indian unity. Such a rivalry
between the Hindus and Muslims could only bode ill for the future of
India.

World War Two shelved the Indian issue – albeit temporarily. The
Indians provided valuable military help in the fight against Japan
especially in the campaign in Burma. The British promised dominion
status for India once the war had ended.

In 1945, the newly elected Labour government headed by Clement

Attlee wanted to push ahead with solving what was seen as the
"Indian Problem". However, the religious rivalry in India was coming
to a head and made any potential solution very complex. Attempts to
draw up a compromise constitution that was acceptable to both
Muslims and Hindus failed. The British plan was to allow the
provincial governments extensive powers whilst central government
would only have limited powers. The Labour government put its faith
in the hope that most Muslims lived in one or two provinces and that
the governments in these provinces would reflect this in their
decision making. If this plan worked, the need for a separate Muslim
state would not be needed. The plan was accepted in principle but
the details for it were not.

The Governor-General of India, Lord Wavell, invited Nehru to form

an interim government in August 1946. Wavell hoped that the details
of such a government could be sorted out later – but he hoped that
the creation of an actual government headed by Indian nationals
would be supported by all. The Hindu Nehru included two Muslims in
his cabinet but this did not succeed in stopping violence. Jinnah
became convinced that Nehru could not be trusted and he called on
Muslims to take "direct action" to get an independent Muslim state.
Violence spread and over 5000 people were killed in Calcutta. India
descended into civil war.

Early in 1947, Atlee announced that Britain would leave India no

later than June 1948. A new Viceroy was appointed – Lord
Mountbatten – and he concluded that peace could only be achieved
if partition was introduced. The Hindu Congress agreed with him.
Mountbatten became convinced that any delay would increase
violence and he pushed forward the date for Britain leaving India to
August 1947.

In August 1947, the Indian Independence Act was signed. This

separated the Muslim majority areas (in the north-west and north-
east regions of India) from India to create the independent state of
Pakistan. This new state was split in two, the two parts being 1000
miles apart. The act was not easy to put into action.

Some people found themselves on the wrong side of frontiers

especially in the mixed provinces of the Punjab and Bengal. Millions
moved to the new frontiers – Hindus in what was to be the new
Pakistan moved to India while Muslims in India moved to Pakistan.
Where the two moving groups met, violence occurred especially in
the volatile Punjab province where it is though 250,000 people were
murdered in religious clashes. By the end of 1947, it seemed as if
the violence was on the wane but in January 1948, a Hindu
assassinated Gandhi. In a gesture that summed up the whole
problem of India, the Hindu detested Gandhi’s tolerance towards
Muslims. However, the murder of Gandhi shocked so many people,
that ironically it ushered in a period of stability.

Jawaharlal Nehru
Mahatma Gandhi
Muhammed Jinnah
History Learning Site > Modern World History > India 1900 to 1947
Search Site:

If you have any enquiries or notice any problems please contact me at

enquiries@historylearningsite.co.uk

About the Author

 Terms of Use
Privacy Policy

© 2000-2008 historylearningsite.co.uk
Traffic optimization