Healthy Workforce: An Essential Health Promotion Sourcebook For Employers, Large and Small
Healthy Workforce: An Essential Health Promotion Sourcebook For Employers, Large and Small
Healthy Workforce: An Essential Health Promotion Sourcebook For Employers, Large and Small
C R E A T I N G
C H A N G E
W I T H
H E A L T H Y
P E O P L E
2 0 1 0
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Statement: The views expressed herein are solely those of the issuing agency and do not necessarily reflect the official positions or policies of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 documents are online at the Healthy People Website at http://health.gov/healthypeople. For more information, visit the Healthy People Website or call 1-800-367-4725.
TA B L E O F CO N T E N T S
1 3 10 12 15 25 31 43 52
INTRODUCTION
1: Healthy People 2010 Objectives Applicable to Worksites 2: Sample Worksite Health Promotion Interest Survey 3: Worksite Wellness Questionare Endnotes
58
APPENDIX
61 63
APPENDIX
INTRODUCTION
At every stage of life, preventive health services hold the promise of improving American lives; making them longer, healthier, and more productive. The promise of prevention stems directly from evidence that many of the leading causes of disability and premature death in the United States are potentially avoidable or controllable, including most injuries, many serious acute and chronic conditions, and many forms of heart disease, and some cancers. As shown in Table 1, most of the ten leading causes of premature death in the U.S. are in some way linked to personal behaviors; behaviors that may either contribute to disease development or exacerbate existing health problems.1 Table 1
employeesand especially those with healthy families, as wellare likely to incur lower medical costs and be more productive. Fortunately, several important risk factors are controllable, often simply by modifying health habits. In fact, behavior changes at any age can return rewards in health and productivity. In other cases, the early detection of illness can simplify treatment and increase chances for a complete recovery. And thats good news for businesses because they rely on people. Many small employers think that only large corporations can afford to sponsor worksite health promotion activities or participate in community-wide health promotion campaigns that benefit both their
Tobacco Diet/activity patterns Alcohol Microbial agents Toxic agents Firearms Sexual behavior Motor vehicles Illicit use of drugs Total
400,000 300,000 100,000 90,000 60,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 1,060,000
Healthy People 2010 is a set of national health objectives, with 10-year targets. The overall goals of Healthy People 2010 are to:1) increase quality and years of healthy life and 2) eliminate health disparities. The document contains 467 objectives organized into 28 focus areas.In addition,10 Leading Health Indicators have been identified including physical activity,tobacco use,and overweight and obesity to help motivate national action around major public health concerns.The Leading Health Indicators balance Healthy People 2010s comprehensive set of health objectives with a small set of specific health priorities.
What does prevention offer employers? Plenty. Adults with multiple risk factors for disease (e.g., high blood pressure, smoking, and sedentary habits) are more likely to be high-cost employees in terms of healthcare use, absenteeism, disability, and overall productivity.2 On the other hand, healthy
employees (past, present, and future) and their corporate image. But health promotion doesnt need to cost much. For about the cost of the holiday party at years end, or the installation of new carpet, small businesses can offer low-cost employee benefits or support broader health promotion efforts that can pay big dividends to companies, employees, and
1
the community-at-largean all-around winning situation. Perhaps it is more appropriate to ask whether small employers can afford to skimp on health promotion programs. Whatever the motivation, now is a particularly opportune time for employers to invest in health promotion at the worksite and beyond. America has embarked on a major initiative to achieve important national health objectives by 2010. Businesses large and small have a valuable opportunity to join with thousands of public and private sector companies to reap the benefits prevention offers while helping their communities meet these objectives. This ambitious effort is guided by Healthy People 2010 the prevention agenda for the United States. And it wont succeed without private and public sector employer participation. Worksites, where most adults typically spend half or more of their waking hours, have a powerful impact on individuals health. Healthy People 2010 includes two major worksite-specific objectives. The first is for most employers (75%), regardless of size, to offer a comprehensive employee health promotion program. The second, and related, objective is to have most employees (75%) participating in employer-sponsored health promotion activities. The 1999 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey reveals that employee health promotion programs are becoming more prevalent and more comprehensive. Many employers are also finding it rewarding to take part in larger community-based health promotion coalitions that address priority health issues. Read on to find out how your company, no matter what size, can be involved in health promotionand why it should be.
SECTION 1
A healthier workforce is a happier and more productive workforce at work,at home,and in retirement. Its that simple.
Bill Bunn,VP of Health,Safety and Productivity,International Truck and Engine Corporation
Michael P. ODonnell, editor of the American Journal of Health Promotion, has noted that health promotion activities are likely to yield greater returns from increased employee productivity than from medical care cost-savings. Productivityrelated benefits are also more likely to be closely aligned with an organizations shortand long-term priorities.5 In fact, in addition to simply keeping employees healthy, the top reasons employers give for instituting health promotion programs are to improve employee morale (mentioned by 77% of (NWHPS) respondents), retain good workers (75%), attract good employees (67%), and improve productivity (64%).4 Worksite health promotion promotes all of these goals. After more than two decades of research with data from almost 2 million workers, the University of Michigan Health Management Research Center reports that,
First Card (First Chicago NBD Corp.) conducted a study to directly correlate the productivity of its 1,039 telephone customer-service agents with health level/disease state.The company found that,as the number of agentshealth risks increased,on-the-job performance declined.Individual health risks and disease states significantly related to low productivity were unhealthy weight,diabetes,digestive and mental health disorders,and general distress.3
One of the best ways to attract and retain the best people in the world is to provide a set of benefits and rewards that are particularly appropriate for the people you are trying to attract.
Glenn Gienko,Executive Vice President and Director of Human Resources, Motorola
* Data are based on responses from 1,544 public and private worksites with at least 50 employees. Source: 1999 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey4 3
The University of Iowa wellness program and its commitment to developing a humane and healthy work environment have served as excellent recruiting and retention tools for the university in a highly competitive labor market. The wellness program has helped identify the University of Iowa as an employer of choice.
Robert Foldesi,Associate Vice President and Director of Human Resources,UI
not surprisingly, individuals with multiple health risks (e.g., obesity, cigarette smoking, and high blood pressure) tend to be less productive than their peers with better health profiles.2 In fact, the explicit connection between health and productivity has spawned several relatively new health promotion concepts of particular relevance to business managers. Health and Productivity Management (HPM), for example, rests on the belief that an at risk workforce is a business liability with both direct and hidden costs that affect productivity. A growing body of scientific research makes the case that managing employee health is an essential, but often overlooked, component of productivity management. A selection of related terms is presented in Table 3.
attracting superlative workers in a competitive global marketplace; reducing absenteeism/lost time; improving on-the-job decision-making and time utilization (reduced presenteeism); improving employee morale and fostering stronger organizational commitments; reducing organizational conflict by building a reservoir of good-will toward management; and reducing employee turnover.
s s
Table 3
Medical Self-Care: Activities and interventions that help individuals identify common self-limiting medical problems, apply appropriate home treatments, and determine when professional medical advice and/or treatment is needed. Medical self-care often includes the use of a reference text, health advice line, or website with health information. Population Health Management (PHM): A new approach to health promotion and disease prevention that uses an annual health risk appraisal to create a health management database that can be used to help plan appropriate health promotion activities for targeted populations (such as an employee group) and evaluate the effectiveness of those interventions over time. PHM typically focuses on changing modifiable risk factors and reducing the number of unnecessary visits to healthcare providers. It generally employs a virtualset of interventions that are not linked to the worksite directly, but reach individuals in their homes (via surface mail, telephone, or internet). It is specifically designed to lower healthcare costs for defined populations. Risk Factors: Behaviors and conditions that place an individual at increased risk for illness or injury. For example, being female and having a family history of breast cancer are two uncontrollable risk factors for breast cancer. Smoking cigarettes and leading a sedentary lifestyle, on the other hand, are two modifiable risk factors for heart disease. Although its confusing, risk factors are also called disease risksor health risks(as in health risk appraisal).
Virtual Wellness: A recently coined term that describes a style of health promotion programming that does not rely on worksite-based interventions. Information and support are generally provided to individuals in their homes.Virtual wellness typically includes: an annual health risk appraisal (HRA), wellness newsletter sent to the home, health advice line, ability to order self-help materials, a medical self-care text, access to a health management website, telephone follow-up with high risk individuals, and targeted mailings based on selected responses from the HRA. Virtual wellness interventions can be integrated with worksite-based interventions to strengthen their impact on behavior change. Work Promotion: A term used to emphasize the workenhancing effects of worksite health promotion interventions. These effects are usually associated with increased organizational profitability and worker productivity.Work promotion encompasses activities to protect and enhance human capitalto achieve meaningful employment and meaningful profits.64
Source: Larry Chapman, Summex Corporation snd George Pfeiffer, The WorkCare Group
On the flip side, worksite health promotion programs also benefit employees (including managers) by
s
improving their physical strength, stamina, and general wellbeing; improving their focus at work; increasing job satisfaction and fostering a positive outlook on life; and bettering relations with co-workers and supervisors.6, 7
s s
significant declines in on-the-job injury (as much as 50% in one department) after just three months after beginning a 20-minute stretching program to help employees warm up before starting repetitive work. Bob Page, manager of employee wellness, reported in Business & Health magazine that workers told (management) their muscles ached less, they felt better physically and they were sleeping better at night as a result of the program.9
Even though much of the evidence supporting worksite health promotion comes from larger companies (i.e., those with the resources to conduct rigorous evaluations of their health promotion programs), benefits accrue to small employers, as well. While program outcomes are dependent on the nature of health promotion activities and the employee population, health promotion programs have achieved a number of productivity goals in a variety of settings. The two outcomes that have been most extensively documented are the reduction of employee health risks and reduced absenteeism.8
Reduced Absenteeism
s
Savings from small decreases in absenteeism alone can more than offset the cost of a health promotion program. For example, a 1998 analysis of five absenteeism studies determined an average program savings of almost $5.00 for every dollar spent. Days lost to illness or disability were reduced by 14% (after implementation of a health promotion program at DuPont) to 68% (as a result of a rehabilitation program for 180 postcoronary patients at Coors Brewing Company).8 Control Data Corporation estimates that its Staywell program, evaluated over a six-year period with longitudinal data on 50,000 employees, has saved the company at least $1.8 million as a result of reduced absenteeism among employees with lowered health risk scores.8 A multi-site intervention involving a police force, chemical company, and banking firm showed that weekly participation in supervised exercise reduced use of sick leave by an average of 4.8 days per person in the year following program implementation.3
The data supporting the claim that health promotion programs can reduce medical care costs and reduce absenteeism is of higher quality than the data most businesses have to support other investments of similar cost.
Michael ODonnell,Editor in Chief & President, American Journal of Health Promotion 5
The Coors 8-week Lifecheck program significantly reduced employees risk for cardiovascular disease. The program, which cost $32 for each of the 692 participants, resulted in documented reductions in blood pressure, blood cholesterol, and weight. 8 Two years after the initiation of a worksite weight control/smoking cessation program, the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan Area saw workers weight drop by an average of 4.8 pounds (among program participants), and 24 employees quit smoking (a 2% quit rate at a cost of $62.50 per successful quitter).8 Steelcase Inc., a furniture maker considered one of the 100 best places to work by Fortune Magazine, experienced
A survey of employees at a northern state university with an established worksite health promotion program found that employees who exercised regularly had significantly greater job satisfaction. Researchers caution, however, that job design and the psychosocial aspects of the work environment may be most influential in improving work-related attitudes.10 A two-year study to compare employee attitudes at companies participating in a comprehensive health promotion program with those of workers at nonparticipating companies found favorable changes attributable to worksite health promotion. Significant change was found in attitudes toward organizational commitment, supervision, working conditions, job competence, job security, and pay and fringe benefits.11
have found that the answer to this question is yes. A 1998 analysis of eight rigorously evaluated health promotion programs determined an average reduction in healthcare expenses of $3.35 for every dollar spent on health promotion.8 Indeed, many studies demonstrate that health promotion programs can and do reduce medical expenditures, resulting in direct cost-savings.8 While some companies have instituted very comprehensive, multicomponent health programs, others have achieved savings with just one or a few simple activities to promote healthy behaviors and/or encourage more appropriate use of health services.
s
Since the 1980s the Kent Intermediate School District (KISD) in Grand Rapids,Michigan,has been involved in worksite health promotion,with activities ranging from health risk assessments to a healthy heart program to group outings.Dr.George Woons,KISD Superintendent,thinks the health promotion activities have paid off in more ways than one.Of all our staff development programs,the health improvement programs have done the most to improve employee morale,he asserts. Woons believes part of the reason is that health promotion programs are a great equalizer.School district staff at all levelscooks and custodians,and teachers and superintendentsoften have the same health risks.And together we participate in activities to reduce those risks.Were all going through this together to improve health; the morale boost is an extra bonus.12
Sunbeam-Oster Co., a producer of small electrical appliances with a largely female workforce, attempted to control health costs by providing mandatory prenatal care classes for pregnant employees. (Classes were held on-site during work hours and women received full pay for attending.) The result? Four premature births occurred during the eight years after the program began, compared to five in the two years preceding the program. Sunbeam-Oster saw its maternal and newborn care costs decline by 86% in just two years (taking into account the cost of the prenatal classes). Overall, costs fell from an average of $27,243 per employee to $3,792.4 The Citibank Health Management Program provided a health risk appraisal to 40 percent of Citibanks 42,000 employees, followed by risk-appropriate interventions to help employees manage chronic conditions and to reduce the demand for unnecessary health services. Over a 38-month period, Citibank spent nearly $2 million and accrued $12.6 million in program benefits, most of which came from the difference in medical expenditures between program participants and non-participants.15 The Hanford Nuclear Reservation slashed the number of lost workdays by offering employees influenza immunizations at multiple worksites over a four-week period. The total number of lost
smokers generated 31% higher claim costs than non-smokers; and workers with unhealthy weights had 143% higher hospital inpatient utilization than those with healthy weights.14
Other studies demonstrate the lowest healthcare costs are associated with individuals with only one to two risk factors. As the number of risk factors increases, so too, do costs.2
s
If excess disease risks are associated with excess medical costs, can lowering risk help control the high price of healthcare? Dozens of mid- to large-size employers
6
workdays attributed to influenza-like illness was 63 per 100 in the unvaccinated group and just 35 per 100 in the vaccinated group. Hanfords savings were estimated at $83.84 per person vaccinated, including productivity gains and reduced use of medical care and prescription drugs.4
s
Duncan Aviation, with 450 employees in Battle Creek, Michigan, began its health awareness program more than 13 years ago solely to keep employees healthy. And it has. Duncan has eliminated 60% of identified employee health risks (high blood pressure, obesity, smoking, etc.). Of equal importance, while the health insurance costs of neighboring companies have been increasing by 18% to 40% over the past several years, Duncans costs have increased only 7% to 14% even though its health plans are more comprehensive than those of neighboring firms. The health awareness program has received the prestigious C. Everett Koop National Health Award, and the company was recognized by Fortune magazine as one of the top 100 U.S. firms at which to be employed.16
annually on healthcare for employees in Flint, Michigan, which is home to the largest concentration of GM employees in the country. Even though the cost of healthcare in Flint is relatively low (for example, average hospital charges are 8% percent lower than the state average and as much as 45% lower than those in California), GMs costs are high because employees use so much healthcare. The communitys health profile no doubt plays a role. The local population has high rates of cigarette smoking and alcohol use and low rates of exercise. The result? Flint residents use inpatient medical services about 62% more than benchmark communities, and are hospitalized about a third more often. The local death rate from heart disease and diabetes exceeds the national average.17 The Washington Business Group on Health (WBGH), a national health policy organization representing the business community, has queried its corporate members about their basic expectations from a healthy community. Results from a survey of WBGH member companies, though not representative of all businesses, are suggestive. While these employers cited a need for a healthy environment, an attractive place to live, safety, and education, they most commonly wanted communities to provide
s
These and numerous other studies provide evidence that well-designed worksite health promotion programs can promote health and yield a financial return-on-investment.
Home Depot feels that doing welland doing goodare inextricably linked and therefore encourages its employees to volunteer for community projects (collectively,millions of volunteer hours),donates millions of dollars to community concerns,and invests millions to keep employees healthy.
Suzanne Apple,Vice President of Community Affairs The Home Depot
Reason #3: Enhance your corporate image and long-term interests by promoting health beyond the worksite.
Although there is little data to discern the impact of community-wide health promotion activities on business success, there is no disputing that the health of a community is related to the economic vitality of the businesses found there. If a communitys physical and human infrastructure deteriorates, businesses eventually leave. Even with internet capabilities and overnight mail, location matters. Consider the case of General Motors, Co., (GM). GM spends about $500 million
a pool of healthy, potential new employees; productive current employees; and basic medical coverage for all local residents.
s s
These employers understand the connection between community health and business success.18
Health promotion offers communities and businesses an opportunity to move forward together. Business participation makes community-wide health promotion effortslike health fairs and healthoriented media campaignsmore likely to succeed. On the other hand, public health agencies, hospitals, and other public partners can give businesses access to data and expert advice on pressing community health problems that probably affect their employees. Businesses also gain by
s s
Reason #4: Help the nation achieve its health objectives for the year 2010.
Employers occupy a prominent and influential position in the health environment, with unparalleled access to working Americans. They are in a unique position to contribute to the health of their employees and their communities. Consequently, they are in an essential position to help the nation achieve its health goals for the year 2010. In fact, without business support, the national Healthy People 2010 initiative, described further below, will fall short. Even well-meaning employers may unknowingly contribute to a cultural environment that does not promote health. For example, employers who do not restrict worksite smoking, by default, put nonsmokers at increased risk for respiratory problems related to secondhand smoke exposure. Often, the choice is not between doing nothing or doing something, but between doing something health-promoting or continuing practices that may unintentionally support poor health habits. Health experts agree that lifestyle changes can be encouraged by increasing awareness of health risks, helping people change problem behaviors, and creating environments that support good health practices. However, of the three, supportive environments will probably have the greatest impact.5 Since most adults spend the majority of their daytime hours at work, the impact of work environment on health can be significant. Employers are also the primary source of health insurance for working Americans and their families. It matters whether or not employers choose or develop health plans that cover preventive services like cancer screening tests, immunizations, and smoking cessation counseling. Lack of insurance coverage is a major barrier to receipt of these important clinical services, as those without coverage are only half as likely to have received a variety of recommended preventive health services as
demonstrating social responsibility; building public goodwill and a reputation as a good corporate citizen (a neighbor of choice); directly and indirectly promoting the health of company employees (since health insurance and worksite health promotion alone do not ensure individual protection from diseases, environmental factors, and risky behaviors that may lead to illness); and directly and indirectly promoting the health of retirees, employees families, potential replacement workers, consumers, and/or service providersall of whom can have an impact on a businesss long-term success. influencing managed care organizations regarding practical benefits for smaller employers.
There are two reasons for using the Healthy People 2010 worksite health objectives.The first is humanistic; knowing that providing a safe and healthy work environment is the right thing to do. The second is practical.Executives must manage the bottom line.And since approximately 50% of injury and illness costs are lifestylerelatedand thus controllablehealth promotion provides significant opportunities to improve productivity and reduce cost.
Steve Fleming,Director,HSE&R Engines & Systems,Honeywell
Here are two quick examples of business involvement in community health efforts.
s
The Eastman Kodak Company is the largest employer in the city of Rochester, New York. As part of the Rochester County Health Commission, Kodak is part of an initiative to make Rochester the healthiest community in America by 2020.18 Proctor and Gamble, based in Cincinnati, Ohio, is a member of the Health Improvement Collaborative of Greater Cincinnati. Its many activities include a regional health status report, a diabetesfocused healthcare study, and a flu shot campaign.18
their insured peers.19 Employers can also play an important role in holding health plans accountable for the delivery of covered services. Finally, as mentioned above, businesses can make meaningful contributions to community health programs. All of these efforts advance the national agenda to achieve a healthier population by the year 2010.
SECTION II
Building public-private partnerships is the foundation of Healthy People's success.We enter the new millennium as a team working together.Through prevention we can improve the health of all Americans.
Dr.David Satcher,Surgeon General 20
Healthy People 2010 is, in essence, the blueprint for a ten-year national initiative to improve the health of all Americans. The two overarching goals are to increase the life expectancy and quality of life for Americans of all ages and to eliminate health disparities among different segments of the population. It lists the most significant threats to health in the United States todayincluding risky behaviors, environmental factors, and inadequate access to healthcareand establishes goals to reduce these threats. Healthy People 2010 was developed through an exhaustive process involving many stakeholders, including businesses. It is based on the best scientific knowledge available and, as it is organized as a set of quantitative health objectives. Healthy People 2010 serves as a scorecard to gauge our collective success toward improving health. States and communities are using Healthy People 2010 objectives as the basis of local health promotion plans. Congress has stipulated that Healthy People 2010 objectives must be used to assess the impact of several federal health programs. Of greater relevance to business, Healthy
People 2010 objectives are also being used to measure the performance of health plans and health care organizations. For example, the National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) has incorporated many Healthy People 2010 targets into its Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS), a compilation of standardized measures to help health care purchasers assess the performance of managed care organizations. Employers can use Healthy People objectives as well, in this case to focus business-sponsored health promotion/disease prevention efforts and measure worksite and community-wide outcomes against national benchmarks. Dozens of objectives in Healthy People 2010 specifically call on employers to help the nation meet its goals (discussed below).
At Motorola,our Wellness Initiatives team was able to demonstrate that Motorola health care dollars are being spent on the same diseases and disparities listed in the Healthy People objectives. We revamped and developed strategic,cutting-edge programs that reduce Motorola's healthcare costs and align with the objectives set forth by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Betty-Jo Saenz,Manager of Global Wellness Initiatives,Motorola.
The Healthy People 2010 Toolkit: A field guide to health planning at www.health.gov/healthypeople/state/toolkit Healthy People Information Line: Recorded information on upcoming events,ordering Health People publications,and the Healthy People Consortium. Call 1-800-367-4725 Fax-Back System: Faxed copies of the complete list of available publications and updated Healthy People progress reviews,fact sheets,and recent issues of Prevention Report.Call (301) 468-3028
healthfinder:
The federal consumer health website featuring special information for men,women,parents,kids,seniors,professionals and Spanish speakers. www.healthfinder.gov
10
action where little has existed by offering its members opportunities to network and benefit from organizations and on-going activities that support health promotion efforts. In short, PHW is a driving force for employer involvement and leadership in local, state, and national efforts to achieve Healthy People 2010 objectives.
PHW
s
develops and disseminates tools that employers can use to create a healthier workplace; provides a forum for business leaders, national organizations, and state and federal agencies to share best practices; and recognizes companies that show leadership in the health promotion arena.
Partnership for Prevention 1233 20th St., NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036-2362 Phone: (202) 833-0009 x 103 Fax: (202) 833-0113 www.prevent.org
Membership in PHW is free-of-charge and open to any business, business-related trade or professional organization, state or local government, or state or local business council that endorses PHW mission to support healthy employees in healthy communities.
11
SECTION III
highlights the two Healthy People 2010 objectives that focus specifically on the worksite; discusses Healthy Workforce objectives relevant to employers and strategies to achieve them; and catalogues about 50 additional objectives that could be adopted as part of a worksite health promotion program.
If you wish to browse the complete set of Healthy People 2010 objectives,simply click on http://www.health.gov/healthypeople/Publications/
Table 4
Table 5
7-5.
Increase the proportion of worksites that offer a comprehensive employee health promotion program to their employees. 1999 Baseline (Developmental) 34 33 33 38 50 2010 Target 75 75 75 75 75
Worksites with fewer than 50 employees Worksites with 50+ employees Worksites with 50 to 99 employees Worksites with 100 to 249 employees Worksites with 250 to 749 employees Worksites with 750+ employees 7-6.
Increase the proportion of employees who participate in employer-sponsored health promotion activities. Baseline: 61 percent of employees aged 18 years and older participated in employer-sponsored health promotion activities in 1994. Target: 75 percent.
The number to the left of the objective is the reference number for the full-text version of Healthy People.The number before the dash corresponds to the chapter while the number after the dash matches the objective number. For exampleobjective 7-5 can be found in Chapter 7, objective #5 of the Healthy People 2010. Developmental objectives are those that currently do not have national baseline data.The purpose of developmental objectives is to identify areas that need to be placed on the national agenda for data collection. Developmental objectives address subjects of sufficient national importance to measure their change.
efforts.4 The challenge, and the opportunity, is to use that foundation to build a comprehensive worksite health promotion program eventually. Overall, employers are encouraged to offer ongoing activities, rather than one-time events, such as a half-day smoking cessation clinic with no follow-up. A single, isolated health education activity does not constitute a health promotion program. But as more elements are included in a health promotion program, the program is more likely to achieve organizational goals, such as improving productivity or enhancing a firms image. Whether an employer decides to hire a health promotion manager, use current staff, or contract with vendors to design and implement a health promotion program, the planning process is the same. Section IV, beginning on page 25, provides an overview of this process, and Section V, beginning on page 31, lists many inexpensive resources to ease the process.
13
aim to improve individual behaviors, while others focus on physical or social environmental factors or important health system issues. The conditions addressed in these eight objectives are relevant to employers because they are responsible for a large burden of illness and injury among U.S. working-age adults, they are associated with business costs, and employers can do something about them. Effective interventions are available and can be offered at the worksite or otherwise be supported by employers. Some are even low cost.
HEALTH BEHAVIORS
Four of the Healthy Workforce Objectives for employers target risky behaviors: tobacco use, alcohol/drug use, physical inactivity, and overweight/obesity. As discussed in Section 1, employees with lifestyle risks, particularly multiple risks, are more likely to use medical services, be absent from work, and have lower productivity than their healthier colleagues. Employers primarily bear the cost of these outcomes. But employees pay a high price too, measured in out-of-pocket medical expenses, possibly reduced earnings, decreased quality of life, and a shortened lifespan. Effective employer-sponsored activities will help employees make lifestyle changes. A supportive social and physical environment will help employees maintain healthy behaviors.
The New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services offers free cessation programs for smokers who want to quit.Three different programs are offered:(1) NJ Quitnet,an Internet resource; (2) NJ Quitline,a tollfree telephone counseling service; (3) and NJ QuitCenters,nine sites t hat offer one-on-one counseling.More than 19,000 physicians,dentists and health care professionals throughout New Jersey received special kits packed with information on the Quitnet and Quitline.Posters,fliers and pocket calendars to display and distribute to patients were mailed to doctors offices,hospitals and clinics.This year the program will be expanded to businesses throughout New Jersey. The programs goals are linked to several Healthy New Jersey 2010 indicators.
14
Table 6
27-1.
Reduce tobacco use by adults. 1997 Baseline 24% 2.6% 2.5% 2010 Target 12% 0.4% 1.2% Developmental
27-5.
27-6. Increase smoking cessation during pregnancy. 27-12. Increase the proportion of worksites with formal smoking policies that prohibit smoking or limit it to separately ventilated areas.
Reduce the cost of lost productivity in the workplace due to alcohol and drug use. (Developmental)
26-10c. Reduce the proportion of adults using any illicit drug during the past 30 days. 26-11c. Reduce the proportion of adults engaging in binge drinking of alcoholic beverages during the past month. 26-12. Reduce average annual alcohol consumption. 26-13. Reduce the proportion of adults who exceed guidelines for low-risk drinking.
22-2.
Increase the proportion of adults who engage regularly, preferably daily, in moderate physical activity for at least 30 minutes per day. Baseline: 15 percent of adults aged 18 years and older were active for at least 30 minutes 5 or more days per week in 1997. Target: 30 percent.
22-1. 22-3.
Reduce the proportion of adults who engage in no leisure-time physical activity. Increase the proportion of adults who engage in vigorous physical activity that promotes the development and maintenance of cardiorespiratory fitness 3 or more days per week for 20 or more minutes per occasion. Increase the proportion of adults who perform physical activities that enhance and maintain muscular strength and endurance. Increase the proportion of adults who perform physical activities that enhance and maintain flexibility.
22-4. 22-5.
22-13. Increase the proportion of worksites offering employer-sponsored physical activity and fitness programs. 19-1. Increase the proportion of adults who are at a healthy weight. Baseline: 42 percent of adults aged 20 years and older were at a healthy weight (defined as a body mass index (BMI) equal to or greater than 18.5 and less than 25) in 1988-94. Target: 60 percent.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
19-2. 19-16
Reduce the proportion of adults who are obese. Increase the proportion of worksites that offer nutrition or weight management classes or counseling.
20-1.
Reduce deaths from work-related injuries. 1998 Baseline Deaths per 100,000 Workers Aged 16 Years and Older 2010 Target
20-5.
Table 6
20-2.
Reduce work-related injuries resulting in medical treatment, lost time from work, or restricted work activity. 1998 Baseline Injuries per 100 Full-Time Workers Aged 16 Years and Older 2010 Target
2-11.
15-19. Increase use of safety belts. 20-3. Reduce the rate of injury and illness cases involving days away from work due to overexertion or repetitive motion. Reduce work-related assault.
All industry Construction Health services Agriculture, forestry, and fishing Transportation Mining Manufacturing Adolescent workers
6.2 8.7 7.9 (1997) 7.6 7.9 (1997) 4.7 8.5 4.8 (1997)
20-6.
1-1.
Increase the proportion of persons with health insurance. Baseline: 83 percent of the population (under age 65) was covered by health insurance in 1997 (age adjusted to the year 2000 standard population). Target: 100 percent.
1-2.
Increase the proportion of insured persons with coverage for clinical preventive services. (Developmental)
The number to the left of the objective is the reference number for the full-text version of Healthy People.The number before the dash corresponds to the chapter while the number after the dash matches the objective number. For exampleobjective 7-5 can be found in Chapter 7, objective #5 of the Healthy People 2010 . Developmental objectives are those that currently do not have national baseline data.The purpose of developmental objectives is to identify areas that need to be placed on the national agenda for data collection. Developmental objectives address subjects of sufficient national to measure their change.
For employers, health and other repercussions of tobacco use can be significant: s higher health and life insurance premiums and claims; s greater absenteeism; s increased risk for accidents and fires (plus related insurance costs);23 s increased maintenance costs due to tobacco litter and tobacco smoke pollution (which dirties ventilation systems, computer equipment, furniture, carpets, and other office furnishings); s property damage from cigarette/cigar burns; s risk of legal liability if nonsmokers are exposed to environmental tobacco smoke; and s reduced worker productivity.
The good news is that most smokers report that they would like to quit; just over two thirds (68%) in 1995. Kicking the habit, though, is hard, since nicotine addiction is comparable to that for heroin, cocaine, and alcohol. Health experts consider nicotine addiction a chronic condition that requires ongoing treatment to prevent or shorten relapse.2425 A 1997 survey by William M. Mercer (funded by Partnership for Prevention) found that about a quarter of very large firms (with 500 or more workers) provide tobacco cessation services for employees at the worksite. Yet, despite the proven success of medical interventions for tobacco use, only 22% of health plans offered by employers with 10 or more workers provide tobacco cessation benefits, and even fewer (12%) cover both counseling and pharmaceutical devices or drugs to help smokers quit.26 U.S. workers face other barriers to cessation services as well. First, while the nicotine patch and gum are available without a prescription, the cost ($390 to $650 for the recommended course of treatment) can be prohibitive for many Americans.27 Second, because nearly a fifth of U.S. workers lack health insurance altogether, 28 they may not be able to afford expert health advice.
STRATEGIES
Prohibit smoking at the workplace. Offer employees and their spouses smoking cessation classes to help them quit. Offer a health risk appraisal (HRA) to all employees, and follow-up with tobacco users. Work with your health plan to ensure coverage for all tobacco use cessation services recommended by the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) including primary care visits for smoking cessation with no co-payment and all cessation pharmaceuticals approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration with usual pharmacy co-pays. (Guidelines entitled Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence can be found at http://www.surgeongeneral. gov/tobacco/default.htm)
Health education Supportive social and physical environments Linkage to related program Screening programs Integration of the worksite program into the organizations administrative structure
(Icon indicates which element(s) of a comprehensive worksite health promotion the strategy addresses. (See Table 4 on Page 12)
Healthy Workforce Objective #2: Reduce The Cost of Lost Productivity Due to Alcohol and Drug Use
In 1995, alcohol and drug abuse cost the U.S. economy an estimated $276 billion. This sizable sum accounts for the costs of health care, motor vehicle crashes, crime, lost productivity, and other outcomes associated with substance abuse. However, most of this amountnearly $200 billion is attributed solely to lost productivity, reflecting foregone earnings due to poor job performance, limited career advancement, and unemployment and incarceration among drug and alcohol abusers. 29 Several studies have shown that alcoholrelated job performance problems absenteeism, arriving late to work or leaving early, feeling sick at work or sleeping on the job, doing poor work, doing less work, and arguing with co-workers are caused not only by worksite drinking, but also by heavy drinking outside of work. For example, one study, using flight simulators, found impairment 14 hours after pilots reached blood alcohol
17
Health education Supportive social and physical environments Linkage to related program Screening programs Integration of the worksite program into the organizations administrative structure
(Icon indicates which element(s) of a comprehensive worksite health promotion the strategy addresses. (See Table 4 on Page 12)
concentrations of between 0.10 to 0.12 %.30, 31 Moreover, those who drink even relatively small amounts of alcoholic beverages may contribute to alcohol-related death and injury in occupational incidents, especially if they drink before operating a vehicle.30-32 Because of these and other concerns, more than 90 % of worksites with 50 or more employees had adopted policies on alcohol and drugs by 1995, exceeding the Healthy People 2000 target of 60%.20 Just how widespread is the problem of substance abuse? In 1994, more than 8% of full-time workers (over 6.5 million employees) engaged in heavy drinking, defined as five or more drinks on five or more days in the past 30 days. The heaviest drinkers were relatively young, between 18 and 25 years of age.33 Almost 15 million Americans (6.7% of the population aged 12 and over) use illicit drugs, and the majority of these users are employed in American businesses. As with alcohol, drug use is greatest among those entering the workforce most rapidly, men and women aged 16 to 25.34 Although no occupation is immune from drug use, it is especially a problem among construction workers (15.6% of whom use illicit drugs), sales personnel (11.4%), food service workers (11.2%), laborers (10.6%,), and machine operators and inspectors (10.5%).35 Unfortunately, the stigma attached to substance abuse often increases the severity of the problem. For example, individuals may be reluctant to acknowledge that they suffer from alcohol or drug dependence and/or may be unwilling to seek treatment, even if it is available.
STRATEGIES
Provide employees access to counseling and referrals to treat substance abuse. Participate in community efforts to prevent substance abuse. Offer a health risk appraisal (HRA) to all employees, and follow-up with those at risk. Establish an employee assistance program (EAP) and/or link EAP to health promotion initiatives. Provide drug and alcohol education to supervisors to counteract enabling behaviors. Provide drug and alcohol education to employees to counteract enabling behaviors. Establish worksite alcohol and drug policies.
Healthy Workforce Objective #3: Increase the proportion of adults who engage in regular, preferably daily, moderate physical activity for at least 30 minutes per day.
Hundreds of studies document the health benefits of physical activity. The report, Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General,36 brings together the collective results of decades of research on this topic. Among the Surgeon Generals findings:
s
People who are usually inactive can improve their health and well-being by becoming even moderately active on a regular basis. Physical activity need not be strenuous to achieve measurable health benefits. Greater cardiorespiratory fitness can be achieved by increasing the duration, frequency, or intensity of physical activity.
18
Regular physical activity (such as a brisk, 30-minute walk each day) delivers many rewards:
s s
STRATEGIES
Sponsor company fitness challenges. Support lunchtime walking/running clubs or company sports team. Create accessible walking trails and/or bike routes. Provide periodic incentive programs to promote physical activity. Offer a health risk appraisal (HRA) to all employees and follow-up with sedentary employees. Contract with health plans that offer free or reduced-cost memberships to health clubs. Provide clean and safe stairwells and promote their use. Provide facilities for workers to keep bikes secure and provide worksite showers and lockers. Allow flexible work schedules so employees can exercise. Discount health insurance premiums and/or reduce copayments and deductibles in return for an employees participation in specified health promotion or disease prevention program.
Health education Supportive social and physical environments Linkage to related program Screening programs Integration of the worksite program into the organizations administrative structure
(Icon indicates which element(s) of a comprehensive worksite health promotion the strategy addresses. (See Table 4 on Page 12)
Reduces the risk of dying prematurely. Reduces the risk of dying from heart disease. Reduces the risk of developing diabetes. Reduces the risk of developing high blood pressure and helps reduce blood pressure in people who already have high blood pressure. Reduces the risk of developing colon cancer. Reduces feelings of depression and anxiety, and appears to improve mood. Helps control weight. Helps build and maintain healthy bones, muscles, and joints. Helps older adults become stronger and better able to move about without falling. Promotes worker productivity.
s s
s s
Yet, despite the benefits, only about 23% of U.S. adults report regular, vigorous activity that involves large muscle groups in dynamic movement for 20 minutes or longer 3 or more days per week. Only 15% of adults report moderate physical activity for 5 or more days per week for at least 30 minutes (Healthy Workforce Objective #3). And fully 40% enjoy no leisure-time physical activity whatsoever.20 Sedentary habits begin in childhood. Almost three quarters (73%) of high school students fail to engage in moderate physical activity for 30 minutes most days of the week.37 The major barriers most people face when trying to increase physical activity are 1) lack of time, 2) inadequate access to convenient and affordable fitness facilities, and 3) lack of safe environments in which to be active.38
19
Health education Supportive social and physical environments Linkage to related program Screening programs Integration of the worksite program into the organizations administrative structure
(Icon indicates which element(s) of a comprehensive worksite health promotion the strategy addresses. (See Table 4 on Page 12)
Healthy Workforce Objective #4: Increase the proportion of adults who are at a healthy weight
More than half the U.S. adult population is currently overweight or obese.39 And the situation is worsening. The proportion of obese U.S. adults rose from an estimated 12% in 1991 to 18% in 1998, with actual figures likely higher.40 In fact, the problem is so pervasive, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention declared obesity a national epidemic in October 1999. Although the causes of excess weight are complex and not fully understood, experts attribute much of the increase in U.S. obesity to the simple fact that adults and children consume more calories than they use.40-42 In other words, overeating and insufficient physical activity underlie much of the epidemic. Between 1977 and 1996, Americans average daily caloric intake increased significantly.43, 44 Moreover, according to the U.S. Department of Agricultures Healthy Eating Index, only 12% of the population aged 2 and older has a diet that can be called good; that is, a diet that meets national guidelines for fat intake and overall variety.43 At the same time, as discussed above, sedentary habits are common among U.S. adults and children. It is not surprising that obese employees tend to be absent from work due to illness substantially more than their normalweight counterparts.45 Almost 80% of obese adults have diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, gallbladder disease, high cholesterol levels, and/or osteoarthritis.46 The cost to the U.S. health system? At least $50 billion worth of medical treatment annually.47 The cost to employers? More than 39 million days of work time each year. Yet, the news is not all bad. Research indicates that a sustained reduction in body weight of just 10% yields significant health and economic benefits.42, 48
STRATEGIES
Provide healthy snacks in vending machines, in break rooms, and at company events. Provide healthy meal choices in cafeterias and at company events. Disseminate nutrition information to employees. For example, work with a weight management vendor to provide information about the nutritional content of cafeteria foods. Subsidize healthy foods in the cafeteria or vending machines. (10 apples may be more appealing than $1.00 candy bars.) Choose health plans that cover programs to help enrollees with weight management. Institute flexible work schedules so employees can participate in weight-loss programs. Offer a health risk appraisal (HRA) to all employees, and follow-up with those at risk. Ask voluntary health associations, health care providers, and/or public health agencies to offer onsite nutrition education classes. If a group of employees are interested in losing weight, offer onsite fitness and weight-management programs. (Ask a dietician at your local health department or hospital about high quality vendors who offer worksite programs.) Locate dietetics professionals near your worksite as a resource for employees who want information on healthy eating/meal planning or weight control. (Use the find a dietician service on the American Dietetic Association website: http://www.eatright.org/finddiet.html.)
20
Assign a fitness center trainer to each participant in weight management classes to help overweight employees meet health and fitness goals. Offer financial incentives for employee participation in weight management programs. For example, offer full or partial reimbursement for the cost of the program or discount health insurance premiuand/or reduce copayments and deductibles after successful program completion. Form a support group to help employees who are trying to lose weight. Offer individual and group counseling to those struggling with weight loss.
What are the major causes of workplace deaths? Highway crashes remain the #1 cause of on-the-job fatalities. The #2 workplace killer is unintentional falls, especially from a roof, ladder or scaffold. And the #3 cause of death, which has declined from previous years, is workplace homicides. (In 1999 there were 645 jobrelated homicides, down 10% from 1998 and 40% from 1994.)51 Prominent nonfatal occupational illnesses and injuries include sprains, fractures, noise-induced hearing loss, repetitive motion disorders (e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome), lower back problems, respiratory conditions resulting from exposure to toxins or dust, elevated blood lead levels, and hepatitis B.49 Many employers, and especially those in high-risk industries, already offer or mandate employee education on job hazards and injury prevention. The most common health and safety policies in midsize to large businesses (those with 50+ employees) address substance use and occupant protection for vehicular drivers. In addition, about half of these firms (53%) offer back injury prevention programs, and 35% have instituted violence prevention programs.4 The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the 1999 rate of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses (6.3 cases per 100 equivalent full-time workers) was the lowest since the bureau began collecting this information in the early 1970s. Similarly, the number of fatal injuries was slightly down despite an increase in the number of employed Americans. Welldesigned worksite safety programs will continue to reduce the burden of occupational health problems for both employers and employees.
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
Two health objectives for employers focus on the physical work environment:
The goals of the Alcoa Life! program are to enhance the wellbeing and the quality of worklife of Alcoa people and their families and encourage and support personal development. We are asking people to do more than just come and make a living in the company.We are asking people to come and make a life in the company.
Alain Belda,President,Alcoa
Healthy Workforce Objective #5: Reducing deaths from workrelated injuries; and Healthy Workforce Objective #6: Reducing work-related injuries necessitating medical care or lost/restricted work activity.
Although U.S. worksites are becoming safer, the toll of workplace injuries and illnesses is still significant. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that in 1999 about 6,000 individuals died from injuries incurred onthe-job. The same year, workers reported 5.7 million nonfatal occupational injuries or illnesses, of which about 2.7 million required recuperation away from work or restricted duties at work.49 The cost to employers from occupational deaths, injuries, and illnesses includes wage and productivity losses, medical costs, administrative expenses (such as the cost of time to write up injury reports), and damage to employer property (notably from fires and automobile accidents). The National Safety Council estimates that in 1998 the cost of occupational deaths and injuries alone totaled more than $125 billion.50
Every Day
s
900 workers sustain disabling injuries on the job 17 workers die from work-related injuries 137 workers die from work-related diseases52
21
STRATEGIES
Ensure that all employees receive appropriate and regular safety training and information. Conduct ergonomic evaluations and consider recommended changes to the worksite.
Many state agencies provide on-site consultation services so that employers can find out about potential hazards at their worksites,improve their occupational safety and health management systems. The New Jersey Department of Labor,Division of Public Safety and Occupational Safety and Health deliver these services using well-trained safety and health professionals.Primarily targeted for smaller businesses of less than 250 employees,the New Jersey safety and health consultation program is completely separate from OSHA inspection efforts.
Develop procedures that encourage employees to report near accidents without fear of penalty so that corrective actions can be taken. Offer incentive awards to individual employees and work groups for achieving specified safety goals. Offer an incentive rebate program that places a projected amount of worker compensation dollars into an incentive pool and disburses to employees half the amount not expended.
However, the same survey identified several important misperceptions on the part of small employers that compound affordability problems.53 For example, 57% of small employers were unaware that their contributions toward employee health coverage are tax deductible. Almost half (48%) did not realize that their employees cannot deduct health insurance premiums when they purchase coverage on their own. Similarly, many small employers are unaware of new rights granted to them through state and federal legislation. About two thirds (67%) of small employers, for example, are unaware that insurers cannot legally deny them group coverage even if their employees have pre-existing illnesses (although they may charge higher insurance premiums).53 Insurance coverage, while costly, is an investment with potential for significant payback. Small employers who provide health benefits offer sound business reasons for doing so. A majority of small employers who fund health insurance report that it:
s s s
helps with employee recruitment; improves employee retention; increases productivity by keeping employees healthy; reduces absenteeism by keeping workers healthy; and improves employee attitude and performance.
By investing in the total well-being of our employees,as they take on the challenges of complex lives,the laboratory not only contributes to the success of individuals,but we make tremendous stride towards organizational excellence.
John C Browne,Director,Los Alamos National Laboratory
Healthy Workforce Objective #7: Increasing the proportion of people with health insurance
The U.S. Census Bureau reports that over 42 million Americans lacked health insurance in 1999. Since many children in low-income families and virtually all U.S. citizens aged 65 and older are covered by public health insurance programs, most of this coverage deficit falls on working Americans, and specifically on those working for small businesses. In fact, while only a tiny fraction of those employed at large firms lack health benefits, nearly a third of those working for firms with 25 or fewer employees do not have health coverage. Thus, small employers can play a critical role to reduce the gap between insured and uninsured. The 2000 Small Employer Health Benefits Survey found that the high cost of insurance is the primary reason many small businesses (i.e., those with 2 to 50 employees) do not offer health benefits.
Health coverage is important because it affects both Americans access to necessary health care and their financial wellbeing. Uninsured children and adults are much more likely than those with health insurance to skip recommended medical tests or treatments. Consequently, they are also more likely to be hospitalized for conditions that might have been avoided in the first place and to be diagnosed at more advanced stages of diseases like cancer. In addition, almost 30% of uninsured adults say that medical bills have had a great impact on their families lives.54
22
Healthy Workforce Objective #8: Increasing the proportion of insured persons with coverage for clinical preventive services
In addition to no coverage at all, a second insurance problem is inadequate coverage of clinical preventive services (i.e., services that prevent the onset of illness or detect it at the earliest possible moment when treatment is easiest). Currently, preventive health services are underused in the United States.55 And it is well documented that individuals who lack coverage for specific preventive services are significantly less likely to receive them than their insured peers.56, 57 As purchasers of most of the nations private health insurance, employers are in a position to substantially expand Americans access to these potentially life-saving services and improve employee health in the process.58
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), a non-federal expert panel convened by the U.S. Public Health Service, is tasked with identifying a core set of preventive services known to improve health. The USPSTF recommendations are so highly regarded that they have been called the gold standard to which employers and health plans should refer when designing benefit programs.59 Table 7 lists those services recommended for healthy adult men and women according to the most recent USPSTF guidelines.60
Table 7
23
Health education Supportive social and physical environments Linkage to related program Screening programs Integration of the worksite program into the organizations administrative structure
(Icon indicates which element(s) of a comprehensive worksite health promotion the strategy addresses. (See Table 4 on Page 12)
STRATEGIES
Form or participate in purchasing cooperatives to bargain for affordable health insurance premiums and health plans that cover appropriate clinical preventive services. Fully administer COBRA provisions for those affected by a qualifying event. Offer group health plan coverage or a medical savings account (MSA) option that is fully employee paid (only as an alternative for small employers who cannot otherwise offer employees health benefits).
24
SECTION IV:
cross-section of potential program participants; individuals who may have a role in program implementation or evaluation (e.g., middle managers who directly control employee schedules or who have great influence on upper management, someone familiar with budgeting, the person responsible for contracting with outside vendors, etc.); and someone to represent management (if not already included in one of the above groups).
The planning committee serves several functions. First, an employee-driven advisory board encourages buy-in from both management and potential program participants. The key to maximizing buy-in is to recruit employees who are enthusiastic about the proposed program, as well as those who are indifferent or perhaps even skeptical to serve on the planning committee. Second, a representative planning committee will help assure that the program is responsive to the needs of all potential participants (possibly including employee dependents and/or retirees). And third, the committee can be responsible for carrying out or overseeing all of the subsequent steps in the planning process. For example, the full committee or designated sub-committee will likely design and conduct an employee interest survey, select the program name and logo, select specific health promotion activities, and present periodic status reports to senior managers. Committee members can also brainstorm innovative ideas to market the program to co-workers. In general, a group of people is likely to generate more and better ideas than a single individual.
25
2. Assess the Interests and Needs of Corporate Leaders and Other Employees.
s
Table 8
1999 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey Summary4
Health Education
Element Percent Offering *
What are the organizational issues facing the employer? What is the level of management support for a health promotion program? What are the most prevalent employee disease and injury risks? What health issues are employees interested in addressing?
Awareness Programs s HIV/AIDS s Prenatal care s Nutrition/cholesterol s Work/family balance Prevention Programs s Back injuries s Violence Lifestyle Behavior Change Programs s Substance Abuse s Stress Management s Physical activity s Smoking s Weight control Demand Management Programs s Nurse advice lines s Self-care book and tools Disease Management Programs s Back pain s Depression s Hypertension s Diabetes s Cancer s Cardiovascular s Asthma s Obesity Screening Programs
s s s s
The answers to these questions are important to assure that any health promotion program has a chance to succeed. One of the most important indicators of the success of a health promotion program is senior management support. Are managers willing to take part in the program and encourage others to do so? How much are they willing to budget for the program? What do they see as the benefits of the program for employees and the organization? And what kinds of activities are they willing to allow? Benchmark data from competitors and descriptions of what other organizations are doing can help engender management support. Table 8 summarizes the health promotion policies, programs, priorities, and intentions of U.S. employers with 50 or more employees.4 Informal surveys of key competitors and other similar organizations can provide additional information. Of equal importance, the planning committee must consider the needs, interests, and expectations of program participants. This task is commonly accomplished through a brief survey, such as that included in Appendix 2. The questionnaire may ask about employee interest in various types of health promotion activities, the most convenient times and places to schedule activities, and/or suggested organizational changes to promote a more healthful work environment. It might also include a health risk appraisal (HRA) to determine current employee disease risks, ascertain the level
26
60% 41%
45% 34%
Supportive Social and Physical Environment Formal Health and Safety Policies s Illegal drugs s Alcohol s Tobacco s Occupant protection On-site Fitness/Exercise Center 95% 94% 79% 47% 13%
* Information from 1,544 worksites with 50 or more employees in the continental US. Offered either at worksite or through health plan
of interest in changing unhealthy behaviors, and collect baseline data that can later be used to help evaluate the program (for example, the percentage of employees who smoke or the percentage of employees who consider themselves in good health). Several excellent HRAs are available on the internet and are briefly described in Section V. Finally, since the work environment is so influential, the planning committee may wish to periodically assess (or recommend that others assess) how well the organization is doing to support healthy behaviors on and off the job. An excerpt from one such survey is presented in Appendix 3. (Additional resources are listed in Section V.) Repeating the same survey over several years can help program planners evaluate the impact of specific organizational changes and help maintain management interest in ongoing health promotion activities.
Goals are statements of broad, long-term accomplishments expected from the program. The most effective goals are realistic and reflect the needs of top managers, as well as lower-level employees. Ideally, goals should be unambiguous, timelimited, and stated in such a way that it is easily possible to determine whether or not they have been achieved. In fact, assessing the achievement of goals is an important part of program evaluation. Examples are:
s
reduce the prevalence of employee smoking from 30% to 25% by the end of the next fiscal year; reduce the overall use of sick leave by at least 2% from the previous year, after the first full year of program operation; and improve employees satisfaction with the company, as measured by employee satisfaction surveys conducted before and after the first full year of program operation. Increase the average score by at least 10%.
3. Develop Mission Statement, Goals, and Objectives and Design the Program.
Once needs assessment data have been collected and reviewed, it is time to develop a mission statement for the program and to set specific goals and objectives. A program mission statement, like an organizational mission statement, briefly lists the overarching values that drive the venture and the ultimate goals or accomplishments that the project will strive to achieve. It is often a good strategy to develop a mission statement for the health promotion program that closely supports the company mission statement. For example, if a companys mission is to be the best or among the best in a particular field, then the mission statement for the health promotion program might read, in part: Recognizing that employees perform their best when they are healthy, and that optimal employee performance is necessary for the company to be a leader in its field, the health promotion program aims to improve employee health and wellbeing.
Objectives are statements of expected short-term accomplishments related to one or more program goals. Like goals, they should be written in such a way that program planners can readily determine if they have been met. For example, objectives that might fall under the first goal statement listed above are:
s
work with health plan to add smoking cessation benefits (including no-cost cessation counseling and pharmaceuticals) at plan renewal time; participate in the American Cancer Societys Great American Smoke-Out this November; and implement a smoke-free work policy by December 31.
For each objective, a list of more detailed action-steps must be developed. At this point, the planning committee may wish to obtain the commitment of specific individuals or departments to carry out certain tasks. Program options, including communications, screening and assessment, interventions (e.g., self-study, group classes, telephonic counseling and support groups) are all part of program design. Decisions about hiring program staff and/or selecting vendors often is considered during this planning phase.
27
5. Select Incentives.
Most people know what lifestyle changes they should make, but lack the motivation to do so. Incentive programs attempt to build that motivation by offering individuals external rewards for taking steps in the right direction. Incentives range from recognition in the employee newsletter for participating in the company baseball team to a certificate of achievement from management for completing a medical self-care class to a small monetary bonus for quitting smoking. They can also include contributions to a health promotion medical savings account, merchandise awards (e.g., cups, t-shirts, etc.), extra time off from work, or travel awards. A common incentive for important behavior changes is a risk-rated premium contribution providing a 33% to 50% discount off the employees premium contribution for dependent health care. (Non-smoker status is one of the primary attributes used in this risk-rated approach.)62 Above all, know your audience; an incentive that will appeal to a truck driver may not appeal to an office worker.
Table 9
Tips to Increase Participation Involve people in planning. Ensuring good participation starts with the program planning process.Broad employee involvement stimulates interest and ownership of the program; its contagious.Encourage advisory committee members talk up the program informally,even before a program starts.Word of mouth is often the best marketing device. Ask people what they want and give it to them. A needs assessment survey builds a sense of anticipation and excitement that can help increase participation. Failure to understand the needs and interests of potential program participants will almost assure low program participation rates. Make the program fun. People enjoy doing what is fun.Use balloons,flowers,and music to create a festive atmosphere for health fairs or health screening activities. Provide incentives. Well-conceived incentives can be expected to increase program participation rates by 12% to 35%.Incentives can also encourage the completion or attendance at multiple program sessions and help participants adhere to long-term behavior change.62 Publicize the program all different ways. Use multiple upbeat methods to promote the program to potential participants including bulletin boards,pamphlets,payroll inserts,voicemail messages,electronic billboards,etc.A creative program name and logo will help to create a positive image that can help increase utilization. Wow, the boss is doing it! Small business owners or top managers who participate in a program encourage others by their example.The general manager for a large refinery in Joliet,Illinois,frequently told employees that anyone can talk with him while he is working out on the treadmill where he works out virtually every morning.Cultivate support from all levels of management. Remove barriers. Make health promotion and related activities easy to sign-up for and conveniently located. Provide program choices. Dont just offer a group smoking cessation group program; also offer guided self-help programs like video or audiotapes and workbooks that employees with a long commute can use privately. Ask how youre doing. Routinely measure program participantssatisfaction with the program content,instructors,logistical arrangements,and other program components.A simple evaluation can determine what participants liked best about the program what they liked least and also get suggestions for program improvement or new topics to address. Why not? Ask some of the people who dont participate,why not? The answers to this simple question can help formulate strategies to help insure participation of nonparticipants. For more ideas to increase participation search the online archive of Health Promotion Practitioner articles.Enter the term "participation" for many tips and ideas.http://www.hesonline.com/index.html 66
29
Generally, if outcomes are not as expected, there are three possible causes. 1) The program was not implemented as planned (for example, no one participated). 2) The program was not well-designed to achieve the desired results (although it may have achieved other unintended positive results, such as improved employee morale). 3) Program goals were unrealistic given the resources available. Whatever the reason(s), this information is valuable and can be used to ensure future program success. Finally, program costs and outcomes can be compared. For example, if a firm spends $3,600 on a health promotion program that reduces the number of employee sick days from 48/year to 12/year, the company has spent $100 for each day of unused sick leave (not considering any other positive program outcomes). (Self-insured firms, those that pay directly for employee healthcare, can also compare program costs to healthcare costs.) Check Section V for a list of workbooks that discuss practical strategies to address evaluation challenges.
Were all activities implemented as planned? If not, why not? Who is using the program? Which activities are most popular? Did the program meet the participants needs? Are participants happy with class instructors, program materials, incentive choices, etc?
s s s
This information can be used to modify the program to enhance participation and participant satisfaction. Outcome measures, on the other hand, gauge the extent to which specific program goals have been achieved. Did the prevalence of employee smoking decrease from 30% to 25% by the end of the fiscal year? Did it decrease at all? Did the number of employees who file disability claims because of lower back problems decline from an average of 3/month to an average of 1/month after health promotion activities were in place for 18 months? Outcome data that demonstrate program success help to secure continued management support for the program. Outcome data that show program goals are not being achieved point to the need for changes.
30
SECTION V:
Resources
This section lists many resources related to worksite health promotion program. Included are textbooks, workbooks, and manuals that provide detailed information to help plan, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive health promotion program. Contact information for several national non-profit health organizations and federal agencies that provide worksite health promotion materials and programs is also included. For the most part, resource listings include the URL for internet access to product or ordering information. Contact information is also provided for federal, state, and non-profit organizations that offer helpful information and/or materials. Most resources include a brief summary. Inclusion in the resources section should not be construed as endorsement by Partnerships for a Healthy Workforce. This list is intended merely as a helpful sampling of known materials and
organizations pertinent to worksite health promotion that can be used as a starting point for identifying and gathering other helpful resources. Organizations listed may discontinue or revise materials from time to time; all of the items listed may not be readily available, or offered in the price range cited. All additions or corrections should be brought to the attention of: Healthy Workforce 2010 Partnerships for a Healthy Workforce Partnership for Prevention 1233 20th St., NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC 20036 Partnerships for a Healthy Workforce staff are familiar with and have personally used many of the resources included in this section, but the listing is by no means complete. Readers are encouraged to use this section as a starting point to discover additional resources.
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
31
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100 Human Kinetics
Publishes a wide variety of resources about all aspects of physical activity primarily for health professionals. Human Kinetics is the official publisher for the YMCA resources on various fitness topics.
P.O. Box 5076, Champaign, IL 61825-5076 (800) 747-4457 http://humankinetics.com/ 32
How to Beg, Borrow and Barter for Low-Cost Wellness Programs By Julie A. Friedman
Looks beyond ordinary ways of supporting health promotion programs and focuses on low-cost ideas for employers.
Growing Health Publications. (310) 456-9722 jfriedman@kagon.net Price Category: 1
Key Documents: Useful Forms for Your Wellness Program By Larry S. Chapman
Provides ready-to-use program documents that help reduce program development time.
Summex Corporation P.O. Box 55056, Seattle, WA 98155 (206) 368-9719 www.summex.com/guides.html Price Category: 1
Health Promotion for All: Strategies for Reaching Diverse Populations at the Workplace By Stephen Ramirez
Discusses how health promotion and diversity are linked and what can be done to remove the barriers that prevent racial and ethnic employee groups from participating in your worksite wellness program.
Wellness Councils of American (WELCOA) (402) 527-3590 http://welcoa.org/ Price Category: 1
Mental Wellness: Addressing Mental and Spiritual Health at Work By Larry S. Chapman
Presents practical tips for adding a mental or spiritual component to wellness programs.
Summex Corporation P.O. Box 55056, Seattle, WA 98155 (206) 368-9719 www.summex.com/guides.html Price Category: 1
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
33
Using Wellness Incentives: Positive Tools for Healthy Lifestyles By Larry S. Chapman
Over 250 creative ideas to effectively use incentives as part of a wellness program, including an in-depth discussion of options for linking wellness with employee benefits.
Summex Corporation P.O. Box 55056, Seattle, WA 98155 (206) 368-9719 www.summex.com/guides.html Price Category: 1
Journals/Newsletters/Magazines
AWHPs Worksite Health
This is the first magazine written for practicing worksite health promotion professionals. Published by the Association for Worksite Health Promotion (AWHP), it includes how-to articles, case studies, business analyses, industry news, and product/service information, plus a special section for peer-reviewed research articles. A free subscription is provided with AWHP membership.
60 Revere Drive, Suite 500, Northbrook, IL 60062 Telephone: (847) 480-9574 http://www.awhp.org/ Price Category: 2
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
34
Journals/Newsletters/Magazines, continued
The American Journal of Health Promotion
This peer-reviewed journal is devoted exclusively to health promotion. Published bimonthly, it presents original research, literature reviews, editorials, and case studies on the full spectrum of health promotion topics: fitness, nutrition, weight control, stress management, smoking cessation, medical self-care, demand management, mind/body health, health policy, employee assistance programs, underserved populations, and much more.
1660 Cass Lake Road, Suite 104, Keego Harbor, MI 48320 (248) 682-0707 www.healthpromotionjournal.com Price Category: 2
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
Shape Up America!
Involving a broad-based coalition of industry, medical/health, nutrition, physical fitness, and related groups, Shape Up America! is a national initiative to promote healthy weight and increased physical activity. The website offers handy tools to assess individuals activity and fitness levels, as well as information about the benefits of exercise, and tips to overcome common barriers to increased physical activity.
http://www.shapeup.org/
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
36
Self-Care Handbooks
Self-care books provide information to help with most basic decisions about prevention, self-care, and when to call a doctor. Books commonly cover common health problems with easy to use charts that show you how to treat problems at home as well as when you should see a doctor. Most books cover emergencies, common injuries, and problems with ears, nose, throat, eyes, and mouth. Information on skin problems and childhood diseases, bones, muscles and joints, chest and abdominal symptoms, generalized problems like fever, stress and addictions, women's health and sexual problems and questions are also addressed in many self-care texts. Ask publisher for special prices for bulk quantities for distribution to employees.
Health at Home: Your Complete Guide to Symptoms, Solutions & Self-Care By Don R. Powell and the American Institute for Preventive Medicine
American Institute for Preventive Medicine Press 30445 Northwestern Hwy., Suite 350, Farmington Hills, MI 48334-3102 (248) 539-1800 e-mail: aipm@healthy.net Price Category: 1
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
37
Self-Care Handbooks
Informed AdvantAge: A Resource Guide for Healthy Aging By George J. Pfeiffer
WorkCare Press P.O. Box 2053, Charlottesville, VA 22902 (804) 977-7525 Price Category: 1
Wise Health Consumers: Resources and Tools for Employers By Larry S. Chapman
Includes practical insights and identifies resources to help plan and implement a cost-effective, wise consumer component to a worksite health promotion program.
Summex Corporation P.O. Box 55056, Seattle, WA 98155 (206) 364-3448 www.summex.com/guides.html Price Category: 1
Take Care of Yourself: The Complete Illustrated Guide to Medical Self-Care By Donald M. Vickery and James F. Fries
http://www.amazon.com Price Category: 1
Workcare: A Resource Guide for the Working Person By George J. Pfeiffer and Judith A. Webster
This manual is intended to increase awareness of occupational-related issues that effect employees today.
WorkCare Press P.O. Box 2053, Charlottesville, VA 22902 (804) 977-7525 Price Category: 1
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
38
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Nutrition and Physical Activity National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Offers many physical activity and healthrelated electronic or printed publications that can be obtained on the website, including: Physical Activity and Health: A
Healthfinder
A free guide to reliable health information provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services with links to many health-related websites.
http://www.healthfinder.gov
MEDLINEplus
This site is a gold mine of up-to-date, quality health care information from the worlds largest medical library, the National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health. MEDLINEplus is for anyone with a medical question. Both health professionals and consumers can depend on it for accurate, current, medical information. Access extensive information about specific diseases and conditions; links to consumer health information from the National Institutes of Health, dictionaries, lists of hospitals and physicians, health information in Spanish and other languages, and clinical trials. There is no advertising on this site, nor does MEDLINEplus endorse any company or product.
http://medlineplus.gov
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Tobacco Information and Prevention Source (TIPS)
Get Surgeon General reports, information on how to quit smoking, and other educational materials. Find out about stop-smoking campaigns and events, and search the smoking and health database. Many useful related links.
http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/index.htm
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
39
The text is written in medicalese impressive-sounding terminology to disguise a lack of good science. The promoter claims the government; the medical profession or research scientists have conspired to suppress the product. The advertisement includes undocumented case histories claiming amazing results. The product is advertised as available from only one source.63
Consumer education information is available from the FTCs website http://www.ftc.gov Check out medical products or services offered on the internet with physicians, pharmacists and other health care professionals, or use sites that are associated with known credible medical organizations. Most health plans have websites that offer health promotion and other resources such as self-care and nurse lines.
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
40
s
The product is advertised as a quick and effective cure-all for a wide range of ailments. The promoters use words like scientific breakthrough, miraculous cure, exclusive product, secret ingredient or ancient remedy.
Take Action!
Take Action! is a 10-week worksite health program free to businesses compliments of the California Health Promotion Collaborative, a group of local and regional health promotion organizations throughout California. Visit the website to review the program and download one of three program packets. The coordinator
packet covers procedures to launch and evaluate the program. All of the Take Action! materials available on this site are formatted for easy and attractive printing in color or black & white from your office printer. The pages are 8.5 x 11 in size, and each packet contains approximately 15 pages, including introductory materials, goal-setting worksheets, ideas, reporting forms, and evaluation forms. The site includes other useful links such to review abstracts of current research on the strong relationship between health and productivity.
www.ca-takeaction.com
Price Scale: 0 = Free 1 = $50 or less 2 = $51 to $100 3 = More than $100
41
42
Healthy Arizona 2010 has an online partnership registration for businesses,community groups and others to register their local projects for affiliation with the state initiative.Projects must state how they related to the goals and objectives of the Healthy Arizona 2010 plan and agree to share their evaluation data.See http://www.hs.state.az.us/phs/healthyaz2010/submit.htm
43
44
45
Maryland Jeanette Jenkins, M.H.S. Director Office of Health Policy Community and Public Health Administration Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene 201 West Preston Street, Room 316 Baltimore, MD 21201 jenkinsj@dhmh.state.md.us Voice: 410-767-5045 Fax: 410-333-7703 http://mdpublichealth.org/ohp/html/ proj2010.html Maine Dora Anne Mills, M.D. State Health Officer Bureau of Health, Programs Office Maine Department of Human Services 157 Capitol Street, State House Station #11 Augusta, ME 04333-0011 dora.a.mills@state.me.us Voice: 207-287-3201, Fax: 207-287-4631 http://janus.state.me.us/dhs/boh/healthyme 2k/pdf/Introduction%20.Pages.pdf Michigan Lonnie Barnett, M.P.H. Manager for the Community Assessment Section Health Legislation and Policy Development Michigan Department of Community Health 320 South Walnut Lansing, MI 48913 barnettl@state.mi.us Voice: 517-241-2966 Fax: 517-241-0084 http://www.mdch.state.mi.us/dch/chi/index. htm
48
49
Utah Dr. Lois Haggard Director Bureau of Surveillance and Analysis Utah Department of Public Health Post Office Box 142101 Salt Lake, UT 84114-2101 lhaggerd@doh.state.ut.us Voice: 801-538-6108 Fax: 801-536-4346 Virginia Henry Murdaugh Healthy People 2000 Contact Virginia Department of Health Post Office Box 2448, Room 227 Richmond, VA 23218 hmurdaugh@vdh.state.va.us Voice: 804-371-8619 Fax: 804-371-0116 http://www.vdh.state.va.us/hv2010/ index.html
50
51
APPENDIX 1
22-1.
Reduce the proportion of adults who engage in no leisure-time physical activity. Target: 20 percent. Baseline: 40 percent of adults aged 18 years and older engaged in no leisure-time physical activity in 1997. Increase the proportion of adults who engage regularly, preferably daily, in moderate physical activity for at least 30 minutes per day. Target: 30 percent. Baseline: 15 percent of adults aged 18 years and older were active for at least 30 minutes 5 or more days per week in 1997 Increase the proportion of adults who engage in vigorous physical activity that promotes the development and maintenance of cardiorespiratory fitness 3 or more days per week for 20 or more minutes per occasion. Target: 30 percent. Baseline: 23 percent of adults aged 18 years and older engaged in vigorous physical activity 3 or more days per week for 20 or more minutes per occasion in 1997 Increase the proportion of adults who perform physical activities that enhance and maintain muscular strength and endurance. Target: 30 percent. Baseline: 18 percent of adults aged 18 years and older performed physical activities that enhance and maintain strength and endurance 2 or more days per week in 1997 Increase the proportion of adults who perform physical activities that enhance and maintain flexibility. Target: 43 percent. Baseline: 30 percent of adults aged 18 years and older did stretching exercises in the past 2 weeks in 1995
NUTRITION OR CHOLESTEROL EDUCATION
22-2.
22-3.
22-4.
22-5.
NO.
12-13.
Reduce the mean total blood cholesterol levels among adults. Target: 199 mg/dL. Baseline: 206 mg/dL was the mean total blood cholesterol level for adults aged 20 years and older in 1988-94 Reduce the proportion of adults with high total blood cholesterol levels. Target: 17 percent. Baseline: 21 percent of adults aged 20 years and older had total blood cholesterol levels of 240 mg/dL or greater in 1988-94 Increase the proportion of persons aged 2 years and older who consume at least two daily servings of fruit. Target: 75 percent. Baseline: 28 percent of persons aged 2 years and older consumed at least two daily servings of fruit in 1994-96 Increase the proportion of persons aged 2 years and older who consume at least three daily servings of vegetables, with at least one-third being dark green or deep yellow vegetables. Target: 50 percent. Baseline: 3 percent of persons aged 2 years and older consumed at least three daily servings of vegetables, with at least one-third of these servings being dark green or deep yellow vegetables in 1994-96
12-14.
19-5.
19-6.
The number to the left of the objective is the reference number for the full-text version of Healthy People.The number before the dash corresponds to the chapter while the number after the dash matches the objective number. For exampleobjective 7-5 can be found in Focus Area (Chapter) 7, objective #5 of the Healthy People 2010. (Age adjusted to the year 2000 standard population). 52
19-7.
Increase the proportion of persons aged 2 years and older who consume at least six daily servings of grain products, with at least three being whole grains. Target: 50 percent. Baseline: 7 percent of persons aged 2 years and older consumed at least six daily servings of grain products, with at least three being whole grains in 1994-96 Increase the proportion of persons aged 2 years and older who consume less than 10 percent of calories from saturated fat. Target: 75 percent. Baseline: 36 percent of persons aged 2 years and older consumed less than 10 percent of daily calories from saturated fat in 1994-96 Increase the proportion of persons aged 2 years and older who consume no more than 30 percent of calories from fat. Target: 75 percent. Baseline: 33 percent of persons aged 2 years and older consumed no more than 30 percent of daily calories from fat in 1994-96 Increase the proportion of persons aged 2 years and older who consume 2,400 mg or less of sodium daily. Target: 65 percent. Baseline: 21 percent of persons aged 2 years and older consumed 2,400 mg of sodium or less daily (from foods, dietary supplements, tap water, and salt use at the table) in 1988-94 Increase the proportion of persons aged 2 years and older who meet dietary recommendations for calcium. Target: 75 percent. Baseline: 46 percent of persons aged 2 years and older were at or above approximated mean calcium requirements (based on consideration of calcium from foods, dietary supplements, and antacids) in 1988-94
WEIGHT MANAGEMENT OR COUNSELING
19-8.
19-9.
19-10.
19-11.
NO.
19-1.
Increase the proportion of adults who are at a healthy weight. Target: 60 percent. Baseline: 42 percent of adults aged 20 years and older were at a healthy weight (defined as a body mass index (BMI) equal to or greater than 18.5 and less than 25) in 1988-94 Reduce the proportion of adults who are obese. Target: 15 percent. Baseline: 23 percent of adults aged 20 years and older were identified as obese (defined as a BMI of 30 or more) in 1988-94 Increase the proportion of worksites that offer nutrition or weight management classes or counseling. Target: 85 percent. Baseline: 55 percent of worksites with 50 or more employees offered nutrition or weight management classes or counseling at the worksite or through their health plans in 1998-99
SMOKING CESSATION CLASSES OR COUNSELING
19-2.
19-16.
NO.
27-1.
27-5.
Increase smoking cessation attempts by adult smokers. Target: 75 percent. Baseline: 41 percent of adult smokers aged 18 years and older stopped smoking for a day or longer because they were trying to quit in 1997 Increase smoking cessation during pregnancy. Target: 30 percent. Baseline: 14 percent smoking cessation during the first trimester of pregnancy in 1991
BLOOD PRESSURE CLASSES OR COUNSELING
27-6.
NO.
12-10.
Increase the proportion of adults with high blood pressure whose blood pressure is under control. Target: 50 percent Baseline: 18 percent of adults aged 18 years and older with high blood pressure were taking action to control it in 1998 (preliminary data; age adjusted to the year 2000 standard population)
53
12-11.
Increase the proportion of adults with high blood pressure who are taking action (for example, losing weight, increasing physical activity, and reducing sodium intake) to help control their blood pressure. Target: 95 percent. Baseline: 82 percent of adults aged 18 years and older with high blood pressure were taking action to control it in 1998 (preliminary data; age adjusted to the year 2000 standard population)
STRESS MANAGEMENT CLASSES OR COUNSELING
NO.
20-9.
Increase the proportion of worksites employing 50 or more persons that provide programs to prevent or reduce employee stress. Target: 50 percent. Baseline: 37 percent of worksites with 50 or more employees provided worksite stress reduction programs in 1992
ALCOHOL OR DRUG ABUSE SUPPORT PROGRAMS
NO.
26-8. 26-10c.
Reduce the cost of lost productivity in the workplace due to alcohol and drug use. (Developmental) Potential data source: Periodic estimates of economic costs of alcohol and drug use, NIH, NIAAA and NIDA. Reduce the proportion of adults using any illicit drug during the past 30 days. Target: 2.0 percent. Baseline: 5.8 percent of adults aged 18 years and older used any illicit drug during the past 30 days in 1997 Reduce the proportion of persons engaging in binge drinking of alcoholic beverages. 2010 Target Target and Baseline: 1997 Baseline Adults aged 18 years and older 16 6 Reduce average annual alcohol consumption. Target: 2 gallons. Baseline: 2.18 gallons of ethanol per person aged 14 years and older were consumed in 1996 Reduce the proportion of adults who exceed guidelines for low-risk drinking. 1992 Baseline Females 72 Males 74
WORKPLACE INJURY PREVENTION PROGRAMS
26-11c.
26-12.
26-13.
2010 Target 50 50
NO.
2-11.
Reduce activity limitation due to chronic back conditions. Target: 25 adults per 1,000 population aged 18 years and older. Baseline: 32 adults per 1,000 population aged 18 years and older experienced activity limitations due to chronic back conditions in 1997. Increase use of safety belts. Target: 92 percent. Baseline: 69 percent of the total population used safety belts in 1998. Reduce work-related injuries resulting in medical treatment, lost time from work, or restricted work activity. 2010 Target 1992 Baseline Injuries per 100 Full-Time Workers Aged 16 Years and Older 20-2a. All industry 6.2 4.3 20-2b. Construction 8.7 6.1 20-2c. Health services 7.9 (1997) 5.5 20-2d. Agriculture, forestry, and fishing 7.6 5.3 20-2e. Transportation 7.9 (1997) 5.5 20-2f. Mining 4.7 3.3 20-2g. Manufacturing 8.5 6.0 20-2h. Adolescent workers 4.8 (1997) 3.4
15-19.
20-2.
The number to the left of the objective is the reference number for the full-text version of Healthy People.The number before the dash corresponds to the chapter while the number after the dash matches the objective number. For exampleobjective 7-5 can be found in Focus Area (Chapter) 7, objective #5 of the Healthy People 2010. (Age adjusted to the year 2000 standard population). 54
20-3.
Reduce the rate of injury and illness cases involving days away from work due to overexertion or repetitive motion. Target: 338 injuries per 100,000 workers. Baseline: 675 injuries per 100,000 full-time workers due to overexertion or repetitive motion in 1997. Reduce occupational needlestick injuries among health care workers. Target: 420,000 annual needle-stick exposures. Baseline: 600,000 occupational needle-stick exposures to blood among health care workers in 1996.
WORKPLACE VIOLENCE PREVENTION PROGRAMS
20-10.
NO.
20-5.
Reduce deaths from work-related homicides. Target: 0.4 deaths per 100,000 workers. Baseline: 0.5 deaths per 100,000 workers aged 16 years and older were from work-related homicides in 1998. Reduce work-related assault. Target: 0.60 assaults per 100 workers. Baseline: 0.85 assaults per 100 workers aged 16 years and older were work-related during 1987-92.
MATERNAL OR PRENATAL PROGRAMS
20-6.
NO.
16-6.
Increase the proportion of pregnant women who receive early and adequate prenatal care. Target: 90 percent. Baseline: 83 percent receive adequate prenatal care in first trimester of pregnancy and 74 percent receive early and adequate care. Increase abstinence from alcohol, cigarettes, and illicit drugs among pregnant women 2010 Target Target and Baseline: 199697 Baseline 16-17a. Alcohol 86 94 16-17b. Binge Drinking 99 100 16-17c. Cigarette smoking 87 (1998) 99 16-17d. Illicit drugs 98 100
HIV OR AIDS EDUCATION
16-17.
NO.
13-5.
Reduce the number of cases of HIV infection among adolescents and adults. Potential data source: HIV/AIDS Surveillance System, CDC, NCHSTP (developmental) Increase the proportion of sexually active persons who use condoms. Target: 50 percent. Baseline: 23 percent of unmarried females aged 18 to 44 years reported condoms used by partners in 1995. Data on males aged 18 to 49 years will be collected and reported by 2003.
CANCER PREVENTION
13-6.
NO.
3-9b.
Increase the proportion of adults aged 18 years and older who follow protective measures that may reduce the risk of skin cancer. Target: 75 percent of adults aged 18 years and older use at least one of the identified protective measures. Baseline: 47 percent of adults aged 18 years and older regularly used at least one protective measure in 1998 (preliminary data). Increase the proportion of women who receive a Pap test. Target: 97% of women 18 years and older who have ever received a Pap test and 90% of women aged 18 years and older who received a Pap test within the preceding 3 years Baseline: 92 percent have ever received a Pap test and 79 percent received a Pap test within the preceding 3 years.
OTHER POSSIBLE HEALTH EDUCATION PROGRAMS
3-11.
NO.
5-2.
Prevent diabetes. Target: 2.5 new cases per 1,000 persons per year. Baseline: 3.5 new cases of diabetes per 1,000 persons (3-year average) in 1994-96. Increase the proportion of adults aged 20 years and older who are aware of the early warning symptoms and signs of a heart attack and the importance of accessing rapid emergency care by calling 911. (Developmental) Increase the proportion of adults who are aware of the early warning symptoms and signs of a stroke. (Developmental)
12-2. 12-8.
55
27-12.
Increase the proportion of worksites with formal smoking policies that prohibit smoking or limit it to separately ventilated areas. Target: 100 percent. Baseline: 79 percent of worksites with 50 or more employees had formal smoking policies that prohibited or limited it to separately ventilated areas in 1998-99.
FORMAL POLICY FOR ALCOHOL
NO.
26-8.
NO.
Reduce the cost of lost productivity in the workplace due to alcohol and drug use. (Developmental) Potential data source: Periodic estimates of economic costs of alcohol and drug use, NIH, NIAAA and NIDA.
EMPLOYER-SPONSORED NUTRITION/WEIGHT-MANAGEMENT
19-16.
Increase the proportion of worksites that offer nutrition or weight management classes or counseling. Target: 85 percent. Baseline: 55 percent of worksites with 50 or more employees offered nutrition or weight management classes or counseling at the worksite or through their health plans in 1998-99.
EMPLOYER-SPONSORED PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND FITNESS
NO.
22-13.
Increase the proportion of worksites offering employer-sponsored physical activity and fitness programs. Target: 75 percent. Baseline: 46 percent in 1988-99: Worksite Health Plan Worksite or Health Plan Worksites with fewer than 50 employees (Developmental) Worksites with 50+ employees 36 22 46 Worksites with 50 to 99 employees 24 21 38 Worksites with 100 to 249 employees 31 20 42 Worksites with 250 to 749 employees 44 56 56 Worksites with 750+ employees 61 27 68
CHANGING THE LANDSCAPE FOR BETTER HEALTH
NO.
1-1.
Increase the proportion of persons with health insurance. Target: 100 percent. Baseline: 83 percent of the population was covered by health insurance in 1997
The number to the left of the objective is the reference number for the full-text version of Healthy People.The number before the dash corresponds to the chapter while the number after the dash matches the objective number. For exampleobjective 7-5 can be found in Focus Area (Chapter) 7, objective #5 of the Healthy People 2010. (Age adjusted to the year 2000 standard population). 56
Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Work/Family Programs Occupational Health and Safety (safety meetings,bloodborne pathogens Occupational Medicine or Medical Services (medical surveillance programs,executive fitness,etc.) Human Resources Programs (training,productivity improvement programs,performance planning and development,etc.) Benefits (growing out of employers concern for rising cost of medical benefits) Workers Compensation/Disability Management Programs
s s
12-12.
Increase the proportion of adults who have had their blood pressure measured within the preceding 2 years and can state whether their blood pressure was normal or high. Target: 95 percent. Baseline: 90 percent of adults aged 18 years and older had their blood pressure measured in the past 2 years and could state whether it was high or low in 1998 (preliminary data; age adjusted to the year 2000 standard population). Increase the proportion of adults who have had their blood cholesterol checked within the preceding 5 years. Target: 80 percent. Baseline: 67 percent of adults aged 18 years and older had their blood cholesterol checked within the preceding 5 years in 1998 (preliminary data; age adjusted to the year 2000 standard population).
12-15.
The number to the left of the objective is the reference number for the full-text version of Healthy People.The number before the dash corresponds to the chapter while the number after the dash matches the objective number. For exampleobjective 7-5 can be found in Focus Area (Chapter) 7, objective #5 of the Healthy People 2010. (Age adjusted to the year 2000 standard population). 57
APPENDIX 2
Male
Female
Age Group: (Please check the age group in that you belong.) Under 21 21-30 31-40 41-50
51-60
60+
IV.
No
Complete if appropriate I would if: I would stop if: I would lose weight if: I would if: I would if: I would if: I would if: I would do more to prevent it if: I would drink less if: I would if: I would if:
12.
58
I would if:
13.
If you could receive written information for five of the health topics listed below, which five would you select? (Check only five!)
Tips for reducing cholesterol Information on HIV/AIDS Weight management techniques Starting a walking program Spiritual wellness Health effects of cocaine use Alcohol tips Asthma management Starting to exercise Avoiding sports injuries Stress reduction tips Nutritious cooking tips Medical self-care Dealing with your doctor Pre-menstrual tension tips Questions for your doctor Second-hand smoke Prevention of sexually transmitted disease Preventing carpal tunnel disorders Sleep disorders Recreational safety Eldercare issues Testicular exam for cancer Personal violence protection
Parenting tips Controlling high blood pressure Headache prevention Preventive dentistry Auto safety Back care Foot care Video Display Terminal safety Home safety Vitamin facts Prescription drug tips Low salt tips Heart disease prevention Cancer detection/prevention Diabetes Nutrition and cancer prevention Hospitalization kit Smoking reduction tips Breast self-exam Mens health Womens health Use of antioxidants PMS tips Health issues for shift workers
14. 15.
Yes
No
Would you participate in any of the following wellness activities on a regular basis if they were offered at work? (Check all those that apply.)
Aerobic exercise classes Weight management program Confidential health screening Sports league activity Health fair Fitness or wellness contest Walking event or club Parenting skills and support Consumer health training session Watch enjoyable movies during lunch
Medical self-care training Monthly wellness seminar Smoking cessation program Blood pressure screening Pot-luck of nutritional foods Blood test for cholesterol Workshop on self-esteem Join a support group Complete a personal fitness contract Annual health management session
16.
If you would like to volunteer to help with the program please write your name, phone number, and any special interest you might have, in the space provided. Name: ____________________________________________________________________ Work Unit: __________________________________________________________________ Phone: ____________________________________________________________________ Mail Stop or E-Mail Address: ______________________________________________________ Your wellness interests: __________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
17.
Would you like a financial incentive to help motivate you to take better care of your own wellness ? Yes No If yes, what kind of incentives would motivate you? ________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
59
18.
Which of the following categories would you place yourself? (Please check only one!)
Im not interested in pursuing a healthy lifestyle. I have been thinking about changing some of my health behaviors. I am planning on making a health behavior change within the next 30 days. I have made some health behavior changes but I still have trouble following through. I have had a healthy lifestyle for years.
In the last twelve months, how many days have you been absent from work due to personal illnesses or injuries? ____________ In the last twelve months, how many times have you visited the doctor? ____________ In the last twelve months, how many days were you in the hospital as a patient? ____________ Would you be interested in completing a confidential health survey that would give you a set of personal health recommendations? Yes No Any additional comments or suggestions for a health promotion/wellness program for employees? ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________
APPENDIX 3
O P F
61
O FP
62
Endnotes
1. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual Causes of Death in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association 1993; 270 (18): 2207-12. 2. Health Management Research Center. The Ultimate 20th Century Cost Benefit Analysis and Report: The University of Michigan; 2000. p. 1-39. 3. Ten Research Studies You Can't Afford to Ignore, Part IV. Worksite Health 1998; 5 (3): 23-27. 4. 1999 National Worksite Health Promotion Survey: Conducted by the Association for Worksite Health Promotion; William M. Mercer, Incorporated; and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1999. 5. ODonnell M. Health Promotion in the Workplace. 3rd ed; 2001. 6. Chapman LS. Proof Positive: An Analyses of the Cost-Effectiveness of Worksite Wellness. 4th ed. Seattle, WA: Summex Corporation; 1999. 7. Chapman LSM. Clearing Up the Productivity Fog. The Art of Health Promotion 1999; 3 (5): 1-12. 8. Aldana SG. Financial Impact of Worksite Health Promotion and Methodological Quality of the Evidence. The Art of Health Promotion 1998; 2 (1). 9. Gemignani J. Best practices that boost productivity. Bus Health 1998; 16 (3): 37-42. 10. Peterson M, Dunnagan T. Analysis of a worksite health promotion programs impact on job satisfaction. J Occup Environ Med 1998; 40 (11): 973-9. 11. Holzbach RL, Piserchia PV, McFadden DW, Hartwell TD, Herrmann A, Fielding JE. Effect of a comprehensive health promotion program on employee attitudes. J Occup Med 1990; 32 (10): 973-8. 12. Woons G. Personal Communication between Garry M. Lindsay and Dr. George Woons, Superintendent, Kent Intermediate School District (Grand Rapids, MI); 2001.
13. Milliman and Robertson Inc and Control Data Corporation. Health Risks and Behavior: The Impact on Medical Costs. Brookfield, WI: Report by Control Data Corporation; 1987. 14. Milliman and Robertson Inc and Chrysler Corporation. Health Risks and Their Impact on Medical Costs. Brookfield, WI: Report by Chrysler Corporation; 1995. 15. Murnane J, Ozminkowski R, Goetzel R.A. Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Citibank, N.A. Health Management Program. Paper presented at: Art and Science of Health Promotion Conference of the American Journal of Health Promotion; March 27, 1998; Phoenix, Arizona. 16. Richard Skouge VP, Human Resources & Support Services Duncan Aviation. Personal communication with Ken Holtyn, Holtyn & Associates Health Promotion Consultants. Kalamazoo, Michigan; March 3, 2001. 17. Bouffard K. Patience, trust build strong communities. Michigan Medicine On-Line 1997; 96 (6). 18. Britt M, Sharda C. The Business Interest in a Communitys Health: Washington Business Group on Health; 2000. p. 30. 19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health insurance coverage and receipt of preventive services United States 1993. MMWR 1995; 44: 219-25. 20. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; November 2000. 21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking among adults United States, 1997. MMWR 1999; 48(43): 993-6. 22. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Trends in cigarette smoking among high school students: United States, 1991-1999. MMWR 2000; 49 (33): 755-58. 23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Making Your Workplace Smokefree: A Decision Makers Guide. http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/research_data/e nvironmental/etsguide.htm ed: Office on Smoking and Health; 2001.
63
24. Fiore M, Bailey W, Cohen S. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; 2000. p. 1-179. 25. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2000. 26. Partnership for Prevention. Why Invest in Disease Prevention? Results from the Partnership for Prevention/William M. Mercer Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Plans. Washington, DC; 1999. 27. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2000: Tobacco Use: http://www.cancer.org/statistics/cff2000/toba cco.html; 2000. 28. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid & the Uninsured. The uninsured and their access to health care. Fact sheet. Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation; 2000. 29. Harwood H., Fountain D., Livermore G. The Economic Costs of Alcohol and Drug Abuse in the United States, 1992. 1998. 30. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Alcohol Alert No. 44; 1999. 31. NIAAA. Ninth Special Report to the U.S. Congress on Alcohol and Health From the Secretary of Health and Human Services (NIH Pub. No. 97-4017). Rockville, MD: NIH. 32. Bernstein M, Mahoney JJ. Management perspectives on alcoholism: the employers stake in alcoholism treatment. Occup Med 1989; 4 (2): 223-32. 33. Office of Applied Studies SAMHSA. National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (Table A2.2-3 Percentage and Estimated Number of Full-Time Workers, Age 18-49, Reporting Current Illicit Drug and Heavy Alcohol Use, by Demographic Characteristics); 1994. 34. SAMHSASubstance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 1999 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse.
35. Office of Applied Studies Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. An Analysis of Worker Drug Use and Workplace Policies and Programs. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; July 1997. 36. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1996. 37. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance United States, 1999. MMWR 1999; 49 (SS-5). 38. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010 (under Physical Activity Leading Health Indicator other issues). www.health.gov/healthypeople/Document/ht ml/uih/uih_4.htm> ed; 2000. 39. Flegal K, Carroll M, Kuczmarski R, Johnson C. Overweight and obesity in the United States: prevalence and trends, 1960-1994. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1998; 22 (1): 39-47. 40. Mokdad AH SM, Dietz WH, Bowman BA, Marks JS, Koplan JP. The spread of the obesity epidemic in the United States, 1991-1998. JAMA 1999; 282 (16): 1519-22. 41. Koplan JP, Dietz WH. Caloric Imbalance and Public Health Policy (Editorial). Journal of the American Medical Association 1999; 282 (16): 1579-81. 42. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: National Institutes of Health; 1998. 43. Kennedy E BS, Lino M, Gerrior SA, Basiotis PP. Diet quality of Americans: Healthy eating index. In: Frazao E, editor. Americas Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1999. 44. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Life Sciences Research Office. Third Report on Nutrition Monitoring in the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1995.
64
45. Tucker L, Friedman G. Obesity and Absenteeism: An Epidemiologic Study of 10,825 Employed Adults. American Journal of Health Promotion 1998; 12 (3): 202-08. 46. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz GA, Dietz WH. The Disease Burden Associated with Overweight and Obesity. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999; 282 (16): 1523-29. 47. Wolf A, Colditz GA. Current Estimates of the Economic Cost of Obesity in the United States. Obesity Research 1998; 6(2): 97-106. 48. Oster G, Thompson D, Edelsberg J, Bird AP, Colditz GA. Lifetime Health and Economic Benefits of Weight Loss Among Obese Persons. American Journal of Public Health 1999; 89 (10): 1536-42. 49. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1999 Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses (at: stats.bls.gov/special.requests/ocwc/oshwc/os h/os/osnr0011.txt). 50. National Safety Council. 1999 Injury facts (at: nsc.org/1rs/statinfo/99051.htm). 51. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 1999 National Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries (at: http://stats.bls.gov/news.release/ cfoi.nr0.htm). 52. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP). Healthy People 2000 Occupational Safety and Health Progress Review (at health.gov/healthypeople/data/ PROGRVW/occupational/default.htm): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; March 1995. 53. Fronstin P, Helman R. Small Employers and Health Benefits: Findings from the 2000 Small Employer Health Benefits Survey. EBRI (Employee Benefit Research Institute) Issue Brief October 2000 (Number 226 and Special Report SR 35). 54. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured Key Facts. The Uninsured and their Access to Health Care; January 2001. 55. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Report of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Second Edition ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 1996.
56. Faulkner LA, Schauffler HH. The effect of health insurance coverage on the appropriate use of recommended clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 1997; 13 (6): 453-8. 57. Fielding JE, Cumberland WG, Pettitt L. Immunization status of children of employees in a large corporation. Jama 1994; 271 (7): 525-30. 58. Levit KR, Lazenby HC, Braden BR. National health spending trends in 1996. National Health Accounts Team. Health Affairs (Millwood) 1998; 17 (1): 35-51. 59. Goetzel R. Preventive Care. Can We Do A Better Job? Managed Care 2001. 60. (USPSTF) The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Clinical Preventive Services for Normal-Risk Adults: URL: http://www.ahrq.gov/ppip/adulttm.pdf. 61. Fries JF. Evidence-Based Approaches to Health Enhancement and Medical Care Cost Reduction in the Workplace. Paper presented at: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Business Team National Expert Panel Meeting, May 3, 2001; Washington, D.C. 62. Chapman LS. Using Wellness Incentives: Positive Tools for Healthy Lifestyles. 2nd ed. Seattle, WA: Summex Corporation; 1996. 63. Bernstein J. Operation Cure.all Targets Internet Health Fraud: Federal Trade Commission; July 24, 1999. 64. Pfeiffer G. Work Promotion vs. Health Promotion: Aligning Your Services With the Needs of the Organization and Its People. AWHPs Worksite Health 1998; 1 (1): 14-20. 65. Lindsay GM. Healthy People 2010: Health Promotion Objectives for the Worksite. The Art of Health Promotion 2000; 4 (5). 66. Health Promotion Practitioner Online http://www.hesonline.com/index.html: Health Enhancement Systems, Midland MI.
65
Notes
w w w. p r e v e n t . o r g