Shell and Tube
Shell and Tube
where
A
o
Outside tube surface area
q Heat duty heat exchange between tube and shell side
U
o
Overall heat transfer coefficient
F Correction factor F=1.0 for cross flow heat exchanger
?T
m
True mean temperature ?T
m
= F ?T
lm
?T
lm
Log mean temperature difference (Est of true mean temperature)
Correction Factor F is be covered in module TFD-HE4 Log-Mean
Temperature Difference
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 28
Overall Heat Transfer Coefficient
q The overall heat transfer coefficient U
o
based on the outside
diameter of tubes can be estimated from:
The individual heat transfer coefficients (h)
Shell wall, outside & inside tube fouling resistances (R
w
, R
fo
, R
fi
)
Overall surface efficiency (?
i
& ?
o
)
o o o
fo
w o
i
fi
i i i
o
o
h
R
R A
R
h A
A
U
1 1 1
+ + +
,
_
+
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 29
Heat Balance of
Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger
q Heat load of a heat exchanger can be estimated from heat balance:
Tube
outlet
Tube
inlet
Shell
outlet
Shell
inlet
T
c,i
T
c,o
T
h,o
T
h,i
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
o h i h
h
p i c o c
c
p
T T c m T T c m q
, , , ,
& &
If three of the temperatures are given, the fourth can be calculated
using the above equation.
The above equation assumes no phase change in any of the fluids.
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 30
Other TFD Modules Supporting
Shell & Tube Heat Exchangers
q Overall heat transfer coefficient is covered in module TFD-HE01
q Log-mean temperature difference is covered in module TFD-HE4
q Heat transfer from finned surfaces is covered in module TFD-HE11
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 31
Total Number of Tubes
q Once the total tube outside surface area A
o
is estimated a cost
effective heat exchanger configuration needs to be calculated.
q Number of tubes N
t
is dependent on tube side flow conditions. It
is related to the shell diameter (D
s
), tube length (L) and tube
diameter (d
o
) together with the allowable pressure drop and the
total tube side flow rate hence the heat transfer coefficient.
L N d A
t o o
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 32
Total Number of Tubes
q The total number of tubes can be predicted as a function of the
shell diameter by taking the shell circle D
s
and dividing it by the
projected area of the tube layout pertaining to a single tube A
1
CTP=0.93 One tube pass
CTP=0.90 Two tube passes
CTP=0.85 Three tube passes
CL=1.00 for 90 & 45 square pitch
CL=0.87 for 30 & 60 equilateral tri pitch
CL - Tube Layout Constant
q CTP is the tube count constant which accounts for the incomplete
coverage of the shell diameter by the tubes due to necessary
clearances between the shell and the outer tube circle.
1
2
4
) (
A
D
CTP N
s
t
2
1
) (
T
P CL A
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 33
Shell Diameter
2
2
2
785 . 0
o
o
T
s
t
d
d
P
D
CL
CTP
N
,
_
,
_
L N d A
t o o
( )
2
1
2
637 . 0
1
]
1
L
d d P A
CTP
CL
D
o o T o
s
q Shell diameter in terms of main constructional diameters can be
expressed as:
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 34
Rating of the Heat Exchanger Design
q Rating an exchanger means to evaluate the thermo-hydraulic
performance of a fully specified exchanger.
q Input to the rating process is heat exchanger geometry (constructional
design parameters), process conditions (flow rate, temperature,
pressure) and material/ fluid properties (density, thermal conductivity)
q First output from the rating process is either the outlet temperature for
fixed tube length or the tube length itself to meet the outlet temperature
requirement.
q Second output from the rating process is the pressure drop for both fluid
streams hence the pumping energy requirements and size.
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 35
Insufficient Thermal Rating
q If the output of the rating analysis is not acceptable, a geometrical
modification should be made
q If the required amount of heat cannot be transferred to satisfy
specific outlet temperature, one should find a way to increase the
heat transfer coefficient or increase exchanger surface area
One can increase the tube side heat transfer coefficient by increasing
the fluid velocity - Increase number of tube passes
One can increase the shell side heat transfer coefficient by decreasing
baffle spacing and/or baffle cut
One can increase the surface area by
Increasing the heat exchanger length
Increasing the shell diameter
Multiple shells in series
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 36
Insufficient Pressure Drop Rating
q If the pressure drop on the tube side is greater than the allowable
pressure drop, then
the number of tube passes can be decreased or
the tube diameter can be increased which may result to
decrease the tube length (Same surface area)
increase the shell diameter and the number of tubes
q If the shell side pressure drop is greater than the allowable pressure
drop then baffle spacing, tube pitch, and baffle cut can be increased
or one can change the baffle type.
THERE IS ALWAYS A TRADE-OFF BETWEEN
THERMAL & PRESSURE DROP RATINGS!
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 37
The Trade-Off
Between Thermal Balance & Flow Loss
q Heat transfer and fluid friction losses tend to compete with one
another.
q The total energy loss can be minimized by adjusting the size of one
irreversibility against the other .
q These adjustments can be made by properly selecting physical
dimensions of the solid parts (fins, ducts, heat exchanger surface).
q It must be understood, however, that the result is at best a
thermodynamic optimum.
Constraints such as cost, size, and reliability enter into the
determination of truly optimal designs.
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 38
Shell Side Heat Transfer Coefficient
q There are three rating methods to calculate the shell side heat
transfer coefficient:
Kern method is a simplified approach suitable for shell side flow without
baffles
Taborek method
Bell Delaware method is the most complex but accurate way of rating a
heat exchanger with baffles
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 39
SHELL SIDE
HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT
WITH BAFFLES
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 40
Shell Side Heat Transfer
Baffled Flow
q When the tube bundle employs baffles, the heat transfer
coefficient is higher than the coefficient for undisturbed flow
around tubes without baffles.
q For a baffled heat exchanger
the higher heat transfer coefficients result from the increased
turbulence.
the velocity of fluid fluctuates because of the constricted area
between adjacent tubes across the bundle.
q Only part of the fluid takes the desired path through the tube
bundle (Stream B), whereas a potentially substantial portion flows
through the leakage areas (Streams A, C, E & F)
However, these clearances are inherent to the manufacturing and
assembly process of shell-and-tube exchangers, and the flow
distribution within the exchanger must be taken into account.
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 41
Main & Leakage Flow Streams
Baffled Heat Exchanger
q There are five different shell side flow streams in a baffled heat
exchanger
Stream Ais the leakage stream in the
orifice formed by the clearance
between the baffle tube hole and the
tube wall.
Stream Bis the main effective cross-
flow stream, which can be related to
flow across ideal tube banks.
Stream Cis the tube bundle bypass stream in the gap between the tube
bundle and shell wall.
Stream E is the leakage stream between the baffle edge and shell wall.
Stream Fis the bypass stream in flow channel partitions due to omissions
of tubes in tube pass partitions.
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 42
Main & Leakage Flow Streams
Baffled Heat Exchanger
Stream C
Stream A
Stream E
Stream F
Pass 1 Pass 2
Stream F happens in a
multiple pass (1-2, 1-4)
heat exchanger
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 43
Bell Delaware Method
Heat Transfer Coefficient & Correction Factors
q In the Delaware method, the fluid flow in the shell is divided into a
number of individual streams A through F as defined before.
q Each of the above streams introduces a correction factor to the
heat transfer correlation for ideal cross-flow across a bank of tubes.
r s b l c ideal o
J J J J J h h
14 . 0
,
3
2
,
_
,
_
,
_
w s
s
s ps
s
s
s
ps i ideal
c
k
A
m
c j h
&
j
i
Colburn j-factor
A
s
Cross flow area at the centerline
of shell for one cross flow
between two baffles
s Stands for shell
w Wall temperature
h
ideal
heat transfer coefficient for pure
cross-flow in an ideal tube bank
J
c
for baffle cut and spacing
J
l
for leakage effects
J
b
bundle bypass flow C & F streams
J
s
for variable baffle spacing in the
inlet and outlet sections
J
r
for adverse temperature gradient
build-up
The combined effects of all these correction factors for a reasonable
well-designed shell-and-tube heat exchanger is of the order of 0.60
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 44
Bell Delaware Method
J
c
Correction Factor
q J
c
is the correction factor for baffle cut and spacing. This factor
takes into account the heat transfer in the window and calculates
the overall average heat transfer coefficient for the entire heat
exchanger.
q It depends on the shell diameter and the baffle cut distance from
the baffle tip to the shell inside diameter.
For a large baffle cut, this value may decrease to a value of 0.53
it is equal to 1.0 for a heat exchanger with no tubes in the window
It may increase to a value as high as 1.15 for small windows with a
high window velocity.
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 45
Bell Delaware Method
J
l
Correction Factor
q J
l
is the correlation factor for baffle leakage effects including tube-
to-baffle and shell-to-baffle leakage (A- and E-streams).
q If the baffles are put too close together, then the fraction of the
flow in the leakage streams increases compared with the cross flow.
q J
I
is a function of the
ratio of total leakage area per baffle to the cross flow area between
adjacent baffles
ratio of the shell-to-baffle leakage area to the tube-to-baffle leakage
area.
q A typical value of J
l
is in the range of 0.7 and 0.8.
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 46
Bell Delaware Method
J
b
Correction Factor
q J
b
is the correction factor for bundle bypassing effects due to the
clearance between the outermost tubes and the shell and pass
dividers (C- and F-streams).
For relatively small clearance between the outermost tubes and the shell
for fixed tube sheet construction, J
b
= 0.90.
For a pull-through floating head, larger clearance is required, J
b
= 0.7.
The sealing strips (see figure8.14) can increase the value of J
b
Stream F
Pa
ss
1
Pa
ss
2
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 47
Bell Delaware Method
J
s
& J
r
Correction Factors
q J
s
is the correction factor for variable baffle spacing at the inlet and
outlet. Because of the nozzle spacing at the inlet and outlet and the
changes in local velocities, the average heat transfer coefficient on
the shell side will change.
q The J
s
value will usually be between 0.85 and 1.00.
q J
r
applies if the shell-side Reynolds number, Re
s
, is less than 100.
If Re
s
< 20, it is fully effective.
This factor is equal to 1.00 if Re
s
> 100.
The combined effect of
all these correction factors
for a well-designed shell-and-tube heat exchanger
is of the order of 0.60
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 48
Bell Delaware Method
Heat Transfer Coefficient - Colburn j-factor
q Colburn-j factor is used in heat transfer in general and free and
forced convection calculations in particular.
It is equivalent to (St.Pr
2/3
) where St is Stanton number
where Stanton Number is defined as
q Colburn j-factor is a function of:
Shell side Reynolds number based on the
outside tube diameter and on the minimum cross
section flow area at the shell diameter
Tube layout
Pitch size
s s
s o
s
A
m d
&
Re
( )
p
p p
t
c
A
m
h
c V
h
Gc
h
S
min
max
&
,
_
( )
4
Re 14 . 0 1
3
a
s
a
a
+
( )
2
Re
33 . 1
1
b
s
b
o T
d P
b f
,
_
( )
4
Re 14 . 0 1
3
b
s
b
b
+
Colburn j-factor
Friction factor
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 50
SHELL SIDE
HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT
WITHOUT BAFFLES
SHELL-and-TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 51
Shell Side Heat Transfer Coefficient
Without Baffles Flow Along the Tube Axis
q The heat transfer coefficient outside the tube bundle is referred to
as the shell-side heat transfer coefficient.
q If there are no baffles, the flow will be along the heat exchanger
inside the shell. Then, the heat transfer coefficient can be based on
the equivalent diameter, D
e
(Same as a double-pipe heat exchanger)
14 . 0 3 / 1 55 . 0
36 . 0
1
]
1
1
]
1
1
]
1
w
b
p
s e e o
k
c
G D
k
D h
14 . 0
3 / 1 55 . 0
Pr Re 36 . 0
1
]
1
w
b e o
k
D h
6 3
10 Re 10 2 < <
s e
s
G D
q D
e
Equivalent shell diameter
q G
s
Shell side mass velocity
q b Bulk fluid temperature
q w Wall temperature
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 52
Equivalent Shell Diameter - D
e
q The equivalent diameter of the shell is
taken as four times the net flow area as
layout on the tube sheet (for my pitch
layout) divided by the wetted perimeter:
perimeter wetted
area flow free 4
e
D
Rectangular Pitch
Triangular Pitch
o
o T
e
d
d P
D
) 4 / ( 4
2 2
2 /
) 8 / 3 ( 4
2 2
o
o T
e
d
d P
D
'
,
_
)} ln(Re 19 . 0 576 . 0 exp{
s
f
q A correlation has been obtained using
the product of distance across the
bundle, taken as the inside diameter
of the shell, Ds and the number of
times the bundle is crossed.
L is the heat exchanger length, B is the
baffle spacing
q Shell side friction coefficient f
includes the entrance and exit losses
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 55
TUBE SIDE
HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICENT
&
FRICTION FACTOR
SHELL-and-TUBE HEAT EXCHAGER
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 56
Tube Side Heat Transfer Correlations
q Extensive experimental and theoretical efforts have been made to
obtain the solutions for turbulent forced convection heat transfer and flow
friction problems in ducts because of their frequent occurrence and
application in heat transfer engineering.
q There are a large number of correlations available in the literature for
the fully developed (hydro-dynamically and thermally) turbulent flow of
single-phase Newtonian fluids in smooth, straight, circular ducts with
constant and temperature-dependent physical properties.
q The objective of this section is to highlight some of the existing
correlations to be used in the design of heat exchange equipment and to
emphasize the conditions or limitations imposed on the applicability of
these correlations.
q Extensive efforts have been made to obtain empirical correlations that
represent a best-fit curve to experimental data or to adjust coefficients in
the theoretical equations to best fit the experimental data.
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 57
Flow Maldistribution& Header Design
q One of the common assumptions in basic heat exchanger design
theory is that fluid be distributed uniformly at the inlet of the
exchanger on each fluid side and throughout the core.
However, in practice, flow maldistribution is more common and can
significantly reduce the desired heat exchanger performance.
q Flow maldistribution can be induced by heat exchanger
Geometry - mechanical design features such as the basic geometry,
manufacturing imperfections, and tolerances
Operating conditions - viscosity or density induced mal distribution,
multi phase flow, and fouling phenomena
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 58
Tube-to-Tube Velocity Variation
q In most cases, geometric flow
entry & exit conditions to the
headers promote a tube-2-tube
velocity variation
Flow velocity distribution over the header
plate before tube entrance for a
rectangular x-sec heat exchanger
X-sectional area of the inlet
pipe to the header plate may
be smaller compared to the
header plate area
90 degree flow turn creates
non-uniform velocity
distribution inside the tubes
Header Plate
q Nusselt correlations presented
in this module assume an
equally distributed flow
between tubes
Same velocity in each tube!
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 59
Tube Side Heat Transfer Coefficient
q Petukhov & Popovs theoretical calculations for the case of fully
developed turbulent flow with constant properties in a circular tube
with constant heat flux boundary conditions fielded a correlation,
which was based on the three-layer turbulent boundary layer model
with constants adjusted to match the experimental data.
Petukhov also gave a simplified form of this correlation as
( )
( ) ( ) 1 Pr 2 / 7 . 12 07 . 1
Pr Re 2 /
3 2
5 . 0
+
f
f
Nu
b b
b
( )
2
28 . 3 Re ln 58 . 1
b
f Where the friction factor f is defined as:
q This equation predicts results in the range of
10
4
< Re < 5x10
6
& 0.5 < Pr < 200 with 6% error
10
4
< Re < 5x10
6
& 0.5 < Pr < 2000 with 10% error
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 60
Tube Side Pressure Drop
q The tube-side pressure dropcan be calculated by knowing the
Number of tube passes, N
p
Length of the heat exchanger, L
Mean fluid velocity inside the tube, u
m
2
2
1
4
m
i
p
t
u
d
LN
f p
2
4
2
tube
i
p
t
G
d
LN
f p
q The change of direction in the passes introduces
an additional pressure drop, ?P
r
due to sudden
expansions and contractions that the tube fluid
experiences during a return
This is accounted with four velocity heads per pass
q Total pressure drop than becomes
2
2
1
4
m r r
u N p
2
2
1
4 4
m p
i
p
total
u N
d
LN
f p
1
]
1
+
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 61
Roadmap To Increase Heat Transfer
q Increase heat transfer coefficent
Tube Side
Increase number of tubes
Decrease tube outside diameter
Shell Side
Decrease the baffle spacing
Decrease baffle cut
q Increase surface area
Increase tube length
Increase shell diameter increased number of tubes
Employ multiple shells in series or parallel
q Increase LMTD correction factor and heat exchanger effectiveness
Use counterflowconfiguration
Use multiple shell configuration
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 62
Roadmap To Reduce Pressure Drop
q Tube side
Decrease number of tube passes
Increase tube diameter
Decrease tube length and increase shell diameter and number of tubes
q Shell side
Increase the baffle cut
Increase the baffle spacing
Increase tube pitch
Use double or triple segmental baffles
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 63
References
q Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design
Ramesh K. Shah & Dusan Sekulic
J ohn Wiley & Sons, 2003
q Compact Heat Exchangers, 3
rd
Edition
W.M. Kays & A.L. London
q Heat Exchangers, Selection Rating & Design
Sadik Kakac & Hongtan Liu
CRC Press, 2
nd
Edition, 2002
q Shell & Tube Heat Exchanger Design Software for Educational
Applications. Int. J . Engng. Ed. Vol. 14, No. 3, p 217-224, 1998
K.C. Leong, K.C. Toh, Y.C. Leong
q Wolverine Tube Heat Transfer Data Book
www.wolverine.com
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 64
APPENDIX
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 65
Dimensional Data For Commercial Tubing
TFD-HE13 - Shell & Tube Heat Exchager Design 66
Dimensional Data For Commercial Tubing