Beyond Natural Selection and Intelligent Design: Sri Aurobindo's Theory of Evolution
Beyond Natural Selection and Intelligent Design: Sri Aurobindo's Theory of Evolution
Beyond Natural Selection and Intelligent Design: Sri Aurobindo's Theory of Evolution
An outline of Sri Aurobindos theory of spiritual evolution is presented. Ultimate Reality relates to each world (ours need not be the only one) as the substance that constitutes it, as a consciousness that contains it, and as an infinite joy that expresses and experiences itself in it. In our world, Ultimate Reality is playing Houdini, enchaining itself as best it can, challenging itself to escape from self-created darkness and inertia, to rediscover its true self and powers, to affirm itself in conditions that appear to be its very opposite. Sri Aurobindo calls the process by which these conditions are created involution. Once we have a sufficient grasp of this process, we are in a position to understand the true nature of evolution, which is not finished: man is a transitional being, his greatness lies not in what he is, but in what he makes possible.
1 Evolution
Evolution, according to Sri Aurobindo, is the one eternal dynamic law and hidden process of the earth-nature (EDH1 246):
The keyword of the earths riddle is the gradual evolution of a hidden illimitable consciousness and power out of the seemingly inert yet furiously driven force of insensible Nature. Earth-life is one self-chosen habitation of a great Divinity and his aeonic will is to change it from a blind prison into his splendid mansion and high heaven-reaching temple. (EDH 161)
The blind prison is the final outcome of a process Sri Aurobindo calls involution, and the purpose of involution is to set the stage for the drama of evolution: The involution of a superconscient Spirit in inconscient Matter is the secret cause of this visible and apparent world. (EDH 161) That evolution happens is obvious. Once the facts supporting it are marshalled, this aspect of the terrestrial existence becomes so striking as to appear indisputable (LD2 868); we can no longer suppose that God or some Demiurge has manufactured each
1
Sri Aurobindo, Essays Human and Divine. Puducherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Publication Department, 1997. All quotations are given with the kind permission of the Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust. Sri Aurobindo, The Life Divine. Puducherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Publication Department, 2005.
10
genus and species ready-made in body and in consciousness and left the matter there, having looked upon his work and seen that it was good (LD 738). But how evolution happens is a quite different question. It ought to be superfluous to point this out, but in certain quarters the ability to distinguish between the fact of evolution and its process seems to have been lost.
A theory of spiritual evolution is not identical with a scientific theory of form-evolution and physical life-evolution; it must stand on its own inherent justification: it may accept the scientific account of physical evolution as a support or an element, but the support is not indispensable. The scientific theory is concerned only with the outward and visible machinery and process, with the detail of Natures execution, with the physical development of things in Matter and the law of development of Life and Mind in Matter; its account of the process may have to be considerably changed or may be dropped altogether in the light of new discovery, but that will not affect the self-evident fact of a spiritual evolution, an evolution of Consciousness, a progression of the souls manifestation in material existence. (LD 868)
2 Ultimate reality
Sri Aurobindos theory of spiritual evolution makes use of the conceptual framework of the original Vedantic texts (the Upanishads), for, as he explains,
it is in those ideas that we shall find the best previous foundation of that which we seek now to rebuild and although, as with all knowledge, old expression has to be replaced to a certain extent by new expression suited to a later mentality and old light has to merge itself into new light as dawn succeeds dawn, yet it is with the old treasure as our initial capital or so much of it as we can recover that we shall most advantageously proceed to accumulate the largest gains in our new commerce with the ever-changeless and everchanging Infinite. (LD 72) Existence pure, indefinable, infinite, absolute, is the last concept at which Vedantic analysis arrives in its view of the universe, the fundamental Reality which Vedantic experience discovers behind all the movement and formation which constitute the apparent reality. (LD 73) This primary, ultimate and eternal Existence, as seen by the Vedantins, is not merely bare existence, or a conscious existence whose consciousness is crude force or power; it is a conscious existence the very term of whose being, the very term of whose consciousness is bliss. . . Just as its force of consciousness is capable of throwing itself into forms infinitely and with an endless variation, so also its self-delight is capable of movement, of variation, of revelling in that infinite flux and mutability of itself represented by numberless teeming universes. To loose forth and enjoy this infinite movement and variation of its self-delight is the object of its extensive or creative play of Force. In other words, that which has thrown itself out into forms is a triune ExistenceConsciousness-Bliss, Sachchidananda,3 whose consciousness is in its nature a creative or rather a self-expressive Force capable of infinite variation in phenomenon and form of its self-conscious being and endlessly enjoying the delight of that variation. It follows
The Sanskrit terms are sat (existence, being, or substance), chit (consciousness), and nanda (delight or bliss); hence Sachchidananda (sat+chit+ nanda).
11
In yet other words, an intrinsically unknowable reality manifests itself and relates to its manifestation as the substance (sat) that constitutes it, as a consciousness (chit) that contains it, and as an infinite bliss (nanda) that expresses and experiences itself in it.
3 Why?
This ancient Vedantic theory of cosmic origin is immediately confronted in the human mind by two powerful contradictions, the emotional and sensational consciousness of pain and the ethical problem of evil. (LD 100)
Sri Aurobindo deals with these contradictions at great length. Here I shall mention only the obvious point that this contradiction cannot be resolved by any account that takes the Creator/Creatrix to be separate from His/Her creation.
On no theory of an extra-cosmic moral God, can evil and suffering be explained, the creation of evil and suffering, except by an unsatisfactory subterfuge which avoids the question at issue instead of answering it or a plain or implied Manicheanism which practically annuls the Godhead in attempting to justify its ways or excuse its works. But such a God is not the Vedantic Sachchidananda. Sachchidananda of the Vedanta is one existence without a second; all that is, is He. If then evil and suffering exist, it is He that bears the evil and suffering in the creature in whom He has embodied Himself. The problem then changes entirely. The question is no longer how came God to create for His creatures a suffering and evil of which He is Himself incapable and therefore immune, but how came the sole and infinite Existence-Consciousness-Bliss to admit into itself that which is not bliss, that which seems to be its positive negation. Half of the moral difficulty that difficulty in its one unanswerable form disappears. It no longer arises, can no longer be put. Cruelty to others, I remaining immune or even participating in their sufferings by subsequent repentance or belated pity, is one thing; self-infliction of suffering, I being the sole existence, is quite another. (LD 102)
Two related questions remain: how through which process or in consequence of which development did suffering and evil come into being, and why did Sachchidananda admit these imperfections into itself? As to why
it is not altogether a mystery if we look at our own nature and can suppose some kindred movement of being in the beginning as [the worlds] cosmic origin. On the contrary, a play of self-concealing and self-finding is one of the most strenuous joys that conscious being can give to itself, a play of extreme attractiveness. There is no greater pleasure for man himself than a victory which is in its very principle a conquest over difficulties, a victory in knowledge, a victory in power, a victory in creation over the impossibilities of creation, a delight in the conquest over an anguished toil and a hard ordeal of suffering. At the end of separation is the intense joy of union, the joy of a meeting with a self from which we were divided. There is an attraction in ignorance itself because it provides us with the joy of discovery, the surprise of new and unforeseen creation, a great adventure of the soul; there is a joy of the journey and the search and the finding, a joy of the battle and the crown, the labour and the reward of labour. If delight of existence be the secret of creation, this too is one delight of existence; it can be regarded as the reason or at least one reason of this apparently paradoxical and con-
12
Shall we say that Sachchidananda is playing Houdini? That it has enchained itself as best it could, challenging itself to escape from self-imposed darkness and inertia, to rediscover its true self and powers, to affirm itself in conditions that appear to be its very opposite? And may not these conditions be the very conditions that lend the greatest possible stability and concreteness to its progressive self-realization, which may go on forever?
Divine play. What Sri Aurobindo is telling us here is that the individual spirit, soul, or purua and this includes everyone who ever walked this planet has chosen to participate in the adventure of evolution: the assent of the embodied spirit must be there already, for Prakriti [Nature] cannot act without the assent of the Purusha. There must have been not only the will of the Divine Purusha to make the cosmic creation possible, but the assent of the individual Purusha to make the individual manifestation possible. (LD 426) Let me tell you in confidence that I never, never, never was a philosopher although I have written philosophy which is another story altogether. I knew precious little about philosophy before I did the Yoga and came to Pondicherry I was a poet and a politician, not a
13
In the apprehending poise (the Vedantic prajna), Sachchidananda distantiates itself from the content of consciousness and thereby takes on the aspect of a self. Concomitantly, the self adopts a multitude of viewpoints within the content of consciousness, thereby effectively becoming a multitude of situated selves.
But what then is the origin of mentality and the organisation of this lower consciousness in the triple terms of Mind, Life and Matter which is our view of the universe? For since all things that exist must proceed from the action of the all-efficient Supermind, from its operation in the three original terms of Existence, Conscious-Force and Bliss, there must be some faculty of the creative Truth-Consciousness which so operates as to cast them into these new terms, into this inferior trio of mentality, vitality and physical substance. This faculty we find in a secondary power of the creative knowledge, its power of a projecting, confronting and apprehending consciousness in which knowledge centralises itself and stands back from its works to observe them. And when we speak of centralisation, we mean, as distinguished from the equable concentration of consciousness of which we have hitherto spoken, an unequal concentration in which there is the beginning of self-division or of its phenomenal appearance. First of all, the Knower holds himself concentrated in knowledge as subject and regards his Force of consciousness as if continually proceeding from him into the form of himself, continually working in it, continually drawing back into himself, continually issuing forth again. From this single act of self-modification proceed all the practical distinctions upon which the relative view and the relative action of the universe is based. A practical distinction has been created between the Knower, Knowledge and the Known, between the Lord, His force and the children and works of the Force, between the Enjoyer, the Enjoyment and the Enjoyed, between the Self, Maya and the becomings of the Self. Secondly, this conscious Soul concentrated in knowledge, this Purusha observing and governing the Force that has gone forth from him, his Shakti or Prakriti, repeats himself in every form of himself. He accompanies, as it were, his Force of consciousness
philosopher. How I managed to do it and why? First, because X proposed to me to cooperate in a philosophical review and as my theory was that a Yogi ought to be able to turn his hand to anything, I could not very well refuse; and then he had to go to the war and left me in the lurch with sixty-four pages a month of philosophy all to write by my lonely self. Secondly, because I had only to write down in the terms of the intellect all that I had observed and come to know in practising Yoga daily and the philosophy was there automatically. But that is not being a philosopher! (Sri Aurobindo, On Himself, p. 374. Pondicherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram, 1972)
14
It is in this apprehending poise, in which the many situated selves present themselves to each other as objects, that the familiar dimensions of space viewer-centered depth and lateral extent come into being and Sachchidananda effectively differentiates into consciousness and substance.
6 Mind
Mind, in Sri Aurobindos terminology, is not Sachchidanandas aspect of consciousness but what this is reduced to when it multiply situates itself and, in each situated selves, loses sight of its identity with its other selves. Consciousness becomes headless and
15
footless (Rig Veda IV. I. 11), and in the middle there is falsehood as a result.7 As we have seen, the creative action of the supermind wells out of an infinite, self-existent delight. As long as the individual selves are consciously identical with each other and with the self of all selves, they perfectly express and experience this delight. But once they are headless once their supra-individual self and its bliss-nature have become superconscient and thus inaccessible to them they experience incapacity, discord, opposition, conflict, frustration, and the like. The creative action of the supermind is primarily qualitative and infinite and only secondarily quantitative and finite. Mind can also be characterized as the superminds secondary action, limiting and dividing, for this remains conscious when the veil of avidya conceals from the individual self the bliss-nature of the supra-individual self.8
Mind in its essence is a consciousness which measures, limits, cuts out forms of things from the indivisible whole and contains them as if each were a separate integer. Even with what exists only as obvious parts and fractions, Mind establishes this fiction of its ordinary commerce that they are things with which it can deal separately and not merely as aspects of a whole. For, even when it knows that they are not things in themselves, it is obliged to deal with them as if they were things in themselves; otherwise it could not subject them to its own characteristic activity. It is this essential characteristic of Mind which conditions the workings of all its operative powers, whether conception, perception, sensation or the dealings of creative thought. It conceives, perceives, senses things as if rigidly cut out from a background or a mass and employs them as fixed units of the material given to it for creation or possession. All its action and enjoyment deal thus with wholes that form part of a greater whole, and these subordinate wholes again are broken up into parts which are also treated as wholes for the particular purposes they serve. Mind may divide, multiply, add, subtract, but it cannot get beyond the limits of this mathematics. [The Minds] office is to translate always infinity into the terms of the finite, to measure off, limit, depiece. Actually it does this in our consciousness to the exclusion of all true sense of the Infinite; therefore Mind is the nodus of the great Ignorance. . . (LD 173174) It is only when the veil is rent and the divided mind overpowered, silent and passive to a supramental action that mind itself gets back to the Truth of things. There we find a luminous mentality reflective, obedient and instrumental to the divine Real-Idea.9 There
The first and the highest are truth; in the middle there is falsehood, but it is taken between the truth on both sides of it and it draws its being from the truth. (Brihadaranyaka Upanishad V. 5. 1.) Sri Aurobindo explains: The truth of the physical reality and the truth of the spiritual and superconscient reality. Into the intermediate subjective and mental realities which stand between them, falsehood can enter, but it takes either truth from above or truth from below as the substance out of which it builds itself and both are pressing upon it to turn its misconstructions into truth of life and truth of spirit. (LD 618) To be precise, this remains conscious in front of the veil, for while the veil is opaque to the surface consciousness (the consciousness in front), it is transparent to the consciousness behind. The latter encompasses the content of the former. What happens in the world therefore has two radically different meanings, depending on who is looking, the surface self or the larger self behind the veil. The view I am presenting goes farther in idealism; it sees the creative Idea as Real-Idea,
16
that is to say, a power of Conscious Force expressive of real being, born out of real being and partaking of its nature and neither a child of the Void nor a weaver of fictions. It is conscious Reality throwing itself into mutable forms of its own imperishable and immutable substance. (LD 125)
17
7 Life
Essentially, objects are subjects seen by other subjects. But to subjects who are ignorant in the Vedantic sense, objects possess an effectively independent existence. As the subject splits into an effectively independent object and a conscious self merely associated with it, so the subjects creative imagination splits into a seemingly unconscious objective action and a will merely exerting a limited influence on it. The objective aspect that conscious force assumes when it acts in or through ignorant individuals, is what Sri Aurobindo means by life. But it is not the only meaning. As there are different senses for mind, depending on the degree of ignorance or involution, so there are different senses for life:
All life depends for its nature on the fundamental poise of its own constituting consciousness; for as the Consciousness is, so will the Force be. Where the Consciousness is infinite, one, transcendent of its acts and forms even while embracing and informing, organising and executing them, as is the consciousness of Sachchidananda, so will be the Force, infinite in its scope, one in its works, transcendent in its power and self knowledge. Where the Consciousness is like that of material Nature, submerged, self-oblivious, driving along in the drift of its own Force without seeming to know it, even though by the very nature of the eternal relation between the two terms it really determines the drift which drives it, so will be the Force: it will be a monstrous movement of the Inert and Inconscient, unaware of what it contains, seeming mechanically to fulfil itself by a sort of inexorable accident, an inevitably happy chance, even while all the while it really obeys faultlessly the law of the Right and Truth fixed for it by the will of the supernal Conscious- Being concealed within its movement. Where the Consciousness is divided in itself, as in Mind, limiting itself in various centres, setting each to fulfil itself without knowledge of what is in other centres and of its relation to others, aware of things and forces in their apparent division and opposition to each other but not in their real unity, such will be the Force: it will be a life like that we are and see around us; it will be a clash and intertwining of individual lives seeking each its own fulfilment without knowing its relation to others, a conflict and difficult accommodation of divided and opposing or differing forces and, in the mentality, a mixing, a shock and wrestle and insecure combination of divided and opposing or divergent ideas which cannot arrive at the knowledge of their necessity to each other or grasp their place as elements of that Unity behind which is expressing itself through them and in which their discords must cease. But where the Consciousness is in possession of both the diversity and the unity and the latter contains and governs the former, where it is aware at once of the Law, Truth and Right of the All and the Law, Truth and Right of the individual and the two become consciously harmonised in a mutual unity, where the whole nature of the consciousness is the One knowing itself as the Many and the Many knowing themselves as the One, there the Force also will be of the same nature: it will be a Life that consciously obeys the law of Unity and yet fulfils each thing in the diversity according to its proper rule and function; it will be a life in which all the individuals live at once in themselves and in each other as one conscious Being in many souls, one power of Consciousness in many minds, one joy of Force working in many lives, one reality of Delight fulfilling itself in many hearts and bodies. (LD 223224)
Of the three principles matter, mind, and life, life is the most mysterious, most misun-
18
derstood, and most neglected. For we are not aware of the force of life at work in us in the manner in which we are aware of our ourselves as subjects, nor are we aware of it in the manner in which we are aware of ourselves as objects. We know well enough that we cannot learn much about our bodies by the method of introspection. We also know though there are those who doubt it that we cannot learn much about our conscious selves by studying our bodies. What we generally fail to realize is the wide gap that exists between our minds and our bodies. This gap is the domain of life. Life is hidden from us (i) because we cannot look behind the surfaces of objects if we seem to do so, all we find is more objects and more surfaces and (ii) because as a rule we are incapable of probing sufficiently into our subconscient parts.10
10
This is why we are not only headless (unable to access the superconscient part of the spectrum of consciousness) but also footless (unable to access the subconscient part). According to a more widely held opinion, particles that lack internal structure are pointlike rather than formless. The least that can be said against this view is that it lacks support both from theory and from experiment. For further reasons to reject it see my Particles, consciousness, volition: A Vedantic vision, AntiMatters 1 (1), 2007, pp. 2353 .
11
19
12
According to the canon of well-established theories in particle physics, the so-called Standard Model, these are the quarks and the leptons.
20
Evolution is the reverse of involution, but only in this particular sense: what is an ultimate and last derivation in the involution is the first to appear in the evolution; what was original and primal in the involution is in the evolution the last and supreme emergence. (LD 885886) Particles do not turn back into conscious individuals; they aggregate, and it is aggregates of particles that form living organism. The inconscient substrate is not abolished but used. Because of its resistance, its darkness and inertia, evolution is the difficult and protracted adventure it was meant to be.
This movement of evolution, of a progressive self-manifestation of the Spirit in a material universe, has to make its account at every step with the fact of the involution of consciousness and force in the form and activity of material substance. For it proceeds by an awakening of the involved consciousness and force and its ascent from principle to prin-
21
22
10
23
13
The real subconscious is a nether diminished consciousness close to the Inconscient; the subliminal is a consciousness larger than our surface existence. But both belong to the inner realm of our being of which our surface is unaware, so both are jumbled together in our common conception and parlance.
24
11
25
26
As you will recall, the process of creation goes through three phases: the development of infinite delight into expressive ideas, the transition from expressive idea to executive force, and the creation, by the executive force, of a revealing form. Evolution may be likened to building a bridge. The support for one end of the bridge is a multitude of unconscious, formless entities the final outcome of Sachchidanandas plunge into involution. The support for the other end is the infinite bliss at the heart of existence deprived of its creative force. Evolution starts with a multitude of formless particles, whose spatial relations are potentially capable of constituting revealing forms, but the executive force needed to created such forms is missing. In addition, there is present from the beginning this infinite delight, potentially capable of issuing expressive ideas, but the dynamism needed to form such ideas is missing. This infinite delight thus incapacitated is what Sri Aurobindo calls the psychic principle or psychic entity. The term entity indicates an original multiplicity of the psychic principle a multiplicity of souls antedating the plunge into involution and persisting throughout the adventure of evolution. (Remember note 5.) Starting from the material end of the bridge, there evolve mental, vital, and bodily instruments, which may act according to their own nature or else be compelled to obey or be an instrumentation of an influx of some diviner Power. Thus there is what we may call a nature dynamism, by which those instruments act when left to themselves, and there is what we may call a soul dynamism, by which the psychic entity influences them or compels them to act differently. Starting from the other end of the bridge, each psychic entity evolves a psychic being with a psychic personality that develops in proportion to the influence it wields over the outer nature.
[The] evolutionary working of Nature from Matter to Mind and beyond it has a double process: there is an outward visible process of physical evolution with birth as its machinery, for each evolved form of body housing its own evolved power of consciousness is maintained and kept in continuity by heredity; there is, at the same time, an
27
28
29
30
12
Epilogue
The process of involution terminates in a multitude of formless particles, whose spatial relations appear to be governed by inflexible laws. Being instrumental in setting the stage for the drama of evolution, these laws the laws of physics do not direct the play. If the infinite delight at the heart of existence is to appear on the stage, it must begin by evolving the necessary instruments, and this it cannot do without modifying the initial, physical mode of its creative dynamism. At the same time, given the Houdiniesque character of the play, we can predict that the modifications will be so small and so few that no detectable violations of physical laws occur. This changes when the Purusha begins to exercise a genuine control, or when the psy
14
Sri Aurobindo, Essays in Philosophy and Yoga. Puducherry: Sri Aurobindo Ashram Publication Department, 1998.
31
chic being begins to take up the reigns of nature. One can foresee a growing susceptibility of the nature dynamism to soul dynamism or (what comes to the same) a progressive strengthening of the latter at the expense of the former. This development cannot but continue until it is complete, that is, until the nature dynamism ceases to exist as a separate dynamism, having been completely integrated into the dynamism of the soul. The bridge will be complete when an organism that has evolved from matters end merges with a psychic being that has evolved from the immaterial end, our of the infinite delight that is Reality Itself.
The principle of the process of evolution is a foundation, from that foundation an ascent, in that ascent a reversal of consciousness and, from the greater height and wideness gained, an action of change and new integration of the whole nature. The first foundation is Matter; the ascent is that of Nature; the integration is an at first unconscious or half-conscious automatic change of Nature by Nature. But as soon as a more completely conscious participation of the being has begun in these workings of Nature, a change in the functioning of the process is inevitable. The physical foundation of Matter remains, but Matter can no longer be the foundation of the consciousness; consciousness itself will be no longer in its origin a welling up from the Inconscient or a concealed flow from an occult inner subliminal force under the pressure of contacts from the universe. The foundation of the developing existence will be the new spiritual status above or the unveiled soul status within us; it is a flow of light and knowledge and will from above and a reception from within that will determine the reactions of the being to cosmic experience. The whole concentration of the being will be shifted from below upwards and from without inwards; our higher and inner being now unknown to us will become ourselves, and the outer or surface being which we now take for ourselves will be only an open front or an annexe through which the true being meets the universe. The outer world itself will become inward to the spiritual awareness, a part of itself, intimately embraced in a knowledge and feeling of unity and identity, penetrated by an intuitive regard of the mind, responded to by the direct contact of consciousness with consciousness, taken into an achieved integrality. The old inconscient foundation itself will be made conscious in us by the inflow of light and awareness from above and its depths annexed to the heights of the spirit. An integral consciousness will become the basis of an entire harmonisation of life through the total transformation, unification, integration of the being and the nature. (LD 753)