Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Population Density of Indian Giant Squirrel Ratufa Indica Centralis (Ryley, 1913) in Satpura National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 0

Article Citation:

Raju Lal Gurjar, Amol S. Kumbhar, Jyotirmay Jena, Jaya Kumar Yogesh,
Chittaranjan Dave, Ramesh Pratap Singh and Ashok Mishra.
Population density of Indian giant squirrel Ratufa indica centralis (Ryley, 1913) in
Satpura National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(7): 1086-1092
J
o
u
r
n
a
l

o
f

R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h

i
n

B
i
o
l
o
g
y

Population density of Indian giant squirrel Ratufa indica centralis (Ryley,
1913) in Satpura National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India
Keywords:
Central Indian landscape, Distance sampling, density estimation, Ratufa
indica centralis.
ABSTRACT:


Information on population and distributional status of Indian giant squirrel
Ratufa indica centralis is poorly known from central Indian hills. The species is
endemic to India and widely distributed in Western Ghats, Eastern Ghats and Central
India. In this study using line transect distance sampling we estimated population
density of giant squirrel in Satpura Tiger Reserve (STR), which is a major biosphere
reserve in central India that harbors wide variety of rare endemic and endangered
species. Density estimate with total effort of 276km line transect shows 5.5 ( 0.82)
squirrels/Km
2
. This study provides first baseline information on ecological density
estimate of Ratufa indica centralis in central Indian landscape. Reduction of
anthropogenic pressure should be the first priority for park managers in Satpura Tiger
reserve.
1086-1092| JRB | 2013 | Vol 3 | No 7
This article is governed by the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by/2.0), which gives permission for unrestricted use, non-commercial, distribution and
reproduction in all medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
www.jresearchbiology.com
Journal of Research in Biology
An International
Scientific Research Journal
Authors:
Raju Lal Gurjar
1
,
Amol .S. Kumbhar
1*
,
Jyotirmay Jena
1
,
Jaya Kumar Yogesh
1
,
Chittaranjan Dave
1
,
Ramesh Pratap Singh
2
,
Ashok Mishra
2
.


Institution:
1. WWF - India, Nisha
Building, Near Forest
Barrier, Katra, Mandla,
Madhya Pradesh, India.

2. Field Director Office,
Satpura Tiger Reserve,
Hoshangabad, Madhya
Pradesh, India.

Corresponding author:
Amol S. Kumbhar















Email Id:








Web Address:
http://jresearchbiology.com/
documents/RA0387.pdf.
Dates:
Received: 08 Oct 2013 Accepted: 08 Nov 2013 Published: 25 Nov 2013
Journal of Research in Biology
An International Scientific Research Journal
Original Research


INTRODUCTION
Habitat fragmentation is cited one of the major
reason for the decrease in abundance of arboreal
mammals and isolation of many species into small
population (Umapathy and Kumar, 2000). Indian Giant
Squirrel Ratufa indica centralis is a maroon and buff
colour and is endemic to India with four sub-species. The
conservation status of Indian giant squirrel (IGS) is the
least concern category of IUCN, Appendix II of
CITES and Schedule II (part II) of Indian Wildlife
(Protection) Act 1972 (Molur et al., 2005). Giant
squirrels occur across a wide range of natural forests.
They have been reported from moist deciduous, dry
deciduous and riparian forests (Datta and Goyal, 1996;
Baskaran et al., 2011; Kanoje, 2008; Jathanna
et al., 2008; Srinivas et al., 2008), old mature teak forests
(Ramachandran, 1988) and teak-mixed forests (Kumara
and Singh, 2006). Habitat fragmentation is one of the
major threats which influence giant squirrel population
due to its arboreal nature. Throughout India several
investigators already studied on population status of
Malabar giant squirrel in Western Ghats (Baskaran et al.,
2011; Ramachandran, 1988; Ganesh and Davidar, 1999;
Madhusudan and Karanth, 2002; Kumara and Singh,
2006; Jathanna et al., 2008; Ramesh et al., 2009;
Umapathy and Kumar, 2000). In central India though
there are studies available on ecobiology of Ratufa
indica centralis (Datta, 1993, 1998, 1999; Datta and
Goyal, 1996; Kanoje, 2008; Kumbhar et al., 2012;
Pradhan et al., 2012; Rout and Swain, 2006) but there is
no study available on status and population density of
this species from central Indian landscape.
In the current study we tried to estimate
population densities of Ratufa indica centralis by line
transect distance sampling (Jathanna et al., 2008) in
Satpura Tiger Reserve of central India. It believes that
this kind of effort will help forest department to take
better management and conservation strategies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study area
The Satpura Tiger Reserve (2219 - 22 30N
and 77 56 - 78 20E) covers an area of 1427.87 km
2

(Figure 1) in south east border of Madhya Pradesh state,
it extends from east to west in the southern part of the
district Hoshangabad in Satpura ranges of Central Indian
landscape. The forest types of satpura tiger reserve
consist of southern moist mixed deciduous forest,
southern dry mixed deciduous forest and dry peninsulas
Sal forest (Champion and Seth, 1968). The terrain of
park is hilly and highly undulating, with dominated tree
species such as Tectona grandis, Shorea robusta,
Buchanania latifolia, Terminalia arjuna, Emblica
officinalis, Madhuca indica and Rauwolfia serpentina.
The faunal diversity comprises of major carnivore such
as Tiger (Panthera tigris), Leopard (Panthera pardus),
Dhole (Cuon alpines) and other small carnivores
including Jungle cat (Felis chaus), Palm civet
(Paradoxurus hermaphroditus) as well as ungulates such
as Spotted deer (Axis axis), Sambar (Cervus unicolor),
Wild boar (Sus scrofa), Barking deer (Muntiacus
muntjak), Rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta) and
Common langur (Semnopithecus entellus). In satpura
birds of prey like crested hawk eagle, black eagle and
crested serpent eagle were major predators of Ratufa
indica centralis (Datta, 1999; Kumbhar et al., 2012).
Also Mehta (1997) reported leopard attempted to prey on
giant squirrel.
Sampling
Line transect methodology was adopted
(Buckland et al., 2001; Jathanna et al., 2008) and
distance sampling methodology was used to estimate
population density of giant squirrel in our study area.
Field sampling was carried out in the months of
December to February 2011 2012. Dur-ing this period
39 permanent transects were established in different
habitat types including riparian patches. Each transect
was surveyed thrice by well trained observer be-tween
Gurjar et al., 2013
1087 Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(7): 1086-1092
06000900 hr. Each transects differed in length, the
average transect length was 2km to 4km. Every time the
species was detected group size, sighting distance and
angle of sighting were recorded. Sighting distances were
measured using lesser rangefinder and the angle of
sighting was recorded using a liquid filled compass. The
field protocols were followed described in Jhala et al.,
(2009). The density of Indian giant squirrel (IGS) was
calculated using DISTANCE program version 6.0 (Laake
et al., 1994). The best model was selected on the basis of
the lowest Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) (Burnham
et al., 1980; Buckland et al., 1993).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A total of 35 Giant squirrel sights comprising
42 individuals were recorded during the study period in
total efforts of 276km. Analysis were done by fitting
different detection functions to the observed data for the
estimation of density. Based on minimum AIC value
(94.9), half normal with cosine proved to be the best fit
for giant squirrel data. As giant squirrel is a arboreal
species its visibility is very high when we compare it
with other terrestrial animals so detection in uniform
manner is normal, AIC value also supports the model
selection. The encounter rate was 0.12 0.06/km
walked, IGS known to be a solitary animal, maximum
two individuals were recorded in a group and mean
group size was calculated as 1.2 0.6 in Satpura Tiger
Reserve.
Studies conducted elsewhere on Indian Giant
Squirrel (IGS) have shown different estimates of
population density (Table. 2). The variation in different
Gurjar et al., 2013
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(7): 1086-1092 1088
Figure 1: Location of Satpura Tiger Reserve in India.


estimates in different studies could be due to the different
habitat types in the different study areas; also seasonal
annual variation and observer differences put limits of
comparison. The present study is the first attempt to
provide baseline information on ecological density status
of Indian giant squirrel in Central Indian landscape
(Table. 1). IGS distribution in STR was observed in
Terminalia arjuna, Madhuca longifolia and Tectona
grandis. These trees are mostly used for feeding and
nesting (Kumbhar et al., 2012). Maximum IGS sightings
were recorded in riparian patches of churna, moist and
dry deciduous forest of watch tower and semi-evergreen
forest of Nimghan to pachmarhi. A viable population is
one that maintains its genetic vigor and potential for
evolutionary adaptation (Kumar et al., 2007), therefore
continuous monitoring of the population status of this
lesser-known mammal in central India should be given
high conservation priority. Excessive amount of
Gurjar et al., 2013
1089 Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(7): 1086-1092
D
e
t
e
c
t
i
o
n

P
r
o
b
a
b
i
l
i
t
y

Figure 2: Result of model fitted in the DISTANCE to estimate detection probability and effective
strip width of giant squirrel in Satpura Tiger Reserve.
Perpendicular distance in meters
Note: DS- estimate average group size; E(S) estimate expected value of cluster size; D estimate of density of
animal; N estimate no. of animals in specified area; Chi-square value P 0.969.
Table 1: Population density and average group size of Indian Giant Squirrel
(density /Km
2
) estimated in Satpura Tiger Reserve.
Parameter Point Estimate Standard Error Percentage Coefficient
of variation
95% Confidence Interval
DS 4.786 0.66 13.83 3.62 6.31
E(S) 1.169 0.59 5.05 1.05 1.29
D 5.595 0.82 14.73 4.17 7.49
N 6.000 0.88 14.73 4.00 7.00
poaching pressure and habitat fragmentation has been
reported in Orissa (Pradhan et al., 2012) which can leads
to population decline. We hope this baseline study will
encourage long-term study, which includes on nesting
breeding habits and resource availability of IGS
populations in Central Indian Forest. Further research
study about population status for this species and
conservation strategies in the central Indian landscape
are recommended.

CONCLUSION:
The present population density of Indian giant
squirrel 5.5 0.8 / Sq Km in Satpura tiger reserve in
central Indian forest is very important as it is first density
estimates from any central Indian forest and will provide
baseline data for future study. Present study is address
the issue of urgent need of survey the status, distribution
and abundance of Indian giant squirrel in central Indian
landscape.

ACKNOWLEDGE:
We are really grateful to Ravi Singh, Secretary
General and CEO, WWF-India and Principal Chief
Conservator of Forest (Wildlife), Chief Wildlife Warden,
Madhya Pradesh for give permission to conduct
phase-IV monitoring of predators and their prey in
Satpura Tiger Reserve. We would like to acknowledge
frontline staff of Satpura tiger reserve, Ratnesh and
Kamal Thakur for their extensive help in field work.

REFERENCES:
Baskaran N, Venkatesan S, Mani J, Srivastava SK
and Desai AA. 2011. Some aspects of the ecology of the
Indian Giant Squirrel Ratufa indica (Erxleben, 1777) in
the tropical forests of Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary,
sout her n Indi a and t hei r conser vat i on
implications. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 3(7): 1899
1908.

Borges R, Mali RS and Somanathan H. 1999. The
status, ecology and conservation of the Malabar Giant
Squirrel Ratufa indica. Final report. United States Fish
and Wildlife Service and Wildlife Institute of India.

Borges R. 1989. Resource heterogeneity and the
foraging ecology of the Malabar Giant Squirrel (Ratufa
indica). PhD Thesis, University of Miami, Florida.


Gurjar et al., 2013
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(7): 1086-1092 1090
Table 2: Density of Indian Giant Squirrel (individual/Km
2
) from other part of India.
Study site Density of IGS /Sqkm Authors
Anamalai Hills 11.4 - 64 Umapathy and Kumar 2000
Kudremukh NP 0.25 Madhusudan and Karanth 2002
Bandipur TR 2.36
Jathanna et al., 2008
Nalkeri 4.55
Sunkadakatte 4.86
Muthodi 10.19
Lakkavalli 12.25
Madumalai TR
2.9 Baskaran et al., 2011
1.6 Ramesh et al.,2009
Kalakad-Mudanthurai TR 1.7 Ramesh et al., 2012
Kakachi 1.42 Ganesh and Davidar 1999
Bhimashankar W Sanctuary
12.4 Borges et al.,1999
15.89 Mehta et al.,2012


Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP and Laake
JL. 1993. Distance Sampling: Estimating abundance of
biological populations. Chapman and Hall, London. 446.

Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake
JL, Borchers DL and Thomas L. 2001. Introduction to
distance sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological
Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 432.

Burnham KP, Anderson DR and Laake JL 1980.
Estimation of density from line transect sampling of
biological populations, Wildlife Monographs, 72: 1-202.

Champion HG and Seth SK 1968. A Revised Survey of
the Forest Types of India. Oxford & IBH Publishers,
New Delhi.

Datta A. 1993. Space-use patterns of the Indian giant
squirrel (Ratufa indica) in relation to food availability in
Bori Wildlife Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh, India. M.Sc.
thesis submitted to Saurashtra University.

Datta A and Goyal SP. 1996. Comparison of Forest
Structure and Use by the Indian Giant Squirrel (Ratufa
indica) in Two Riverine Forests of Central India.
Biotropica, 28 (3), 394399.

Datta A. 1998. Anti-predatory response of the Indian
giant squirrel Ratufa indica to predation attempts by the
Crested Hawk Eagle Spizaetus cirrhatus limnaetus.
Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 95(2): 332
335.

Datta A. 1999. Daytime resting in the nest An
adaptation by the Indian giant squirrel Ratufa indica to
avoid predation. Journal of Bombay Natural History
Society, 96, 132 134.

Ganesh T and Davidar P. 1999. Fruit Biomass and
Relative Abundance of Frugivores in a Rain Forest of
Southern Western Ghats, India, Journal of Tropical
Ecology, 15 (4), 399-413.

Jathanna D, Kumar NS and Karanth KU. 2008.
Measuring Indian giant squirrel (Ratufa indica)
abundance in southern India using distance sampling,
Current Science, 95(7): 885-888.

Jhala YV, Qureshi Q, Gopal R and Amin R. 2009.
Field Guide: Monitoring tigers, co-predators, prey and
their habitats. Third ed. Technical publication of
National Tiger Conservation Authority, New Delhi and
the Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun.

Kanoje RS. 2008. Nesting sites of Indian Giant Squirrels
in Sitanadi Wildlife Sanctuary, India, Current Science,
95 (7): 882 884.

Kumara HN and Singh M. 2006. Distribution and
relative abundance of giant squirrels and flying squirrels
in Karnataka, India, Mammalia. 70(1-2): 40-47.

Kumar S, Agoramoorthy G and Hsu MJ. 2007.
Population size, density and conservation status of the
grizzled giant squirrel in Chinnar Wildlife sanctuary,
India. Mammalia. 70(1-2): 89 94.

Kumbhar A, Pradhan A and Patwardhan G. 2012.
Some observation on dray building and jumping
behavior of Indian Giant Squirrel Ratufa indica
(Erxleben, 1777). Universal Journal of Environmental
Research and Technology, 2(4): 366 368.

Laake JL, Buckland ST, Anderson DR and Burnham
KP. 1994. DISTANCE: users guide V2.1. Colorado
Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Colorado
State University, Fort Collins, USA.

Madhusudan MD and Karanth KU. 2002. Local
Hunting and the Conservation of Large Mammals in
India, Ambio, 31(1): 49-54.

Mehta P, Kulkarni J, Pawar T, Sahoo RK, Arulmalar
E and Punjabi G. 2012. Status and Distribution of
Malabar Giant Squirrel Ratufa indica in Western Ghats
of Maharashtra, India. Wildlife Research and
Gurjar et al., 2013
1091 Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(7): 1086-1092
Submit your articles online at www.jresearchbiology.com

Advantages
Easy online submission
Complete Peer review
Affordable Charges
Quick processing
Extensive indexing
You retain your copyright

submit@jresearchbiology.com

www.jresearchbiology.com/Submit.php.
Conservation Society, Pune. Final Technical Report
submitted to WWF New Delhi and Ruffords Small
Grants Program, United Kingdom. 74.

Mehta P. 1997. Leopard (Panthera pardus) attempting
to prey on Indian giant squirrel (Ratufa indica centralis).
Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 94: 555-556.

Molur S, Srinivasulu C, Srinivasulu B, Walker S,
Nameer PO and Ravikumar L. 2005. Status of South
Asian Non-volant Small Mammals: (C.A.M.P.)
Workshop Report. Zoo Outreach Organisation/CBSG-
South Asia, Coimbatore, India, 618 p.

Pradhan AK, Shrotriya S and Rout SD. 2012.
Observation on Nest- Site selection by Indian giant
squirrel in Karlapat Wildlife Sanctuary, Odisha, Small
Mammal Mail, 4(2):12-13.

Ramesh T, Snehalatha V, Sankar K and Qureshi Q.
2009. Food habits and prey selection of tiger and leopard
in Madumalai Tiger Reserve, Tamil Nadu, India. Journal
of Scientific Transaction in Environment and
Technovation, 2(3): 170 181.

Ramesh T, Sridharan N, Sankar K, Qureshi Q,
Selvan KM, Gokulakkannan N, Francis P,
Narasimmarajan K, Jhala YV and Gopal R. 2012.
Status of large carnivores and their prey in tropical rain
forests of South-Western Ghats, India. International
society of Tropical Ecology, 53 (2): 137 148.

Ramachandran KK. 1988. Ecology and Behaviour of
Malabar Giant Squirrel, Ratufa indica maxima
(Schreber), Kerala Forest Research Institute, P 18.

Rout SD. and Swain D. 2006. The Giant Squirrel
(Ratufa indica) in Similipal Tiger Reserve, Orissa, India.
Tiger paper. 33(4): 24-27.

Srinivas V, Venugopal PD and Ram S. 2008. Site
occupancy of the Indian giant squirrel Ratufa indica
(Erxleben) in KalakadMundanthurai Tiger Reserve,
Tamil Nadu, India. Current Science, 95 (7): 889-894.

Umapathy G and Kumar A. 2000. The occurrence of
arboreal mammals in the rain forest fragments in the
Anamalai Hills, south India, Biological Conservation, 92
(3): 311-319.
Journal of Research in Biology (2013) 3(7): 1086-1092 1092
Gurjar et al., 2013

You might also like