HW WK6
HW WK6
HW WK6
3.
The market risk premium is a forward-looking tool and should always be positive. Because the
market has risk, it will periodically have a negative return or a small positive return that is
smaller than the T-bill rate. Thus, realized returns over a short period of time will sometimes
show what appears to be a negative risk premium. However, historical risk premiums should be
measured over long periods of time.
7.
Using standard deviation, you would need to determine how the fourth stock interacts with the
three stocks already owned. To do this you would have to compute the correlation between the
new stock and each of the three already held. Then, the portfolio standard deviation could be
computed. If the new portfolio standard deviation is lower then the original portfolio standard
deviation, then adding the new stock lowers the risk. Of course, the portions, or weights of all
the stocks will matter. Determining whether adding a stock will increase or lower the risk of the
portfolio is much easier using beta. If the beta of the fourth stock is higher than the beta of the
portfolio, then it will increase the risk when added.
14.
A. semi-strong form
B. strong form
C. not efficient
D. semi-strong form
CH 10 Problems
10-2
Expected return = 0.235% + 0.610% + 0.2-30% = 7%
10-5
Average market risk premium = 15.8% 5.6% = 10.2%
10-8
Nanometrics required return = 4.5% + 4.05 (12% 4.5%) = 34.875%
10-27
For the portfolio, determine the total value of the portfolio and the weights of each stock in the
portfolio:
Total value = $40.80100 + $30.10150 + $57.4075 + $23.80200 = $17,660
Amazon.com weight = $40.80100 / $17,660 = 23.1%
Family Dollar weight = $30.10150 / $17,660 = 25.6%
McKesson weight = $57.4075 / $17,660 = 24.4%
Schering-Plough weight = $23.80200 / $17,660 = 26.9%
Now compute the portfolio beta = 0.2313.8 + 0.2561.2 + 0.2440.4 + 0.2690.5 = 1.42
So the portfolios required return = 3.5%+1.42(12%3.5%) = 15.5%
CH 11 Questions
4.
You would want to use the CAPM when you can estimate the firms beta with a good deal of
certainty: you would only want to use the constant-growth model if the firms stock is expected
to experience constant dividend growth.
7.
Given that the new line of business will comprise so much of the firms operations, it probably
isnt appropriate to count on the current, existing operations to pay off the debt. Therefore, the fir
should probably compute a new required rate of return for this firms debt.
CH 11 Problems
11-3
Solving equation for i
D
:
( )
( )
10
10
1
1
1
$1, 000
Solve $970 $82.50 for
1
D
D
D
D
i
i
i
i
(
(
+
(
= +
`
(
+
(
)
Yields i
D
= .087115, or 8.7115%
11-6
1
0
$11
$137
.0803, or 8.03%
P
D
i
P
=
=
=
11-7
2, 000, 000 $27
2, 000, 000 $27 1, 000, 000 $14.50 10, 000 .98 $1, 000
$54, 000, 000
$78, 300, 000
.6897, or 68.97%
E
E P D
=
+ + + +
=
=
11-9
2, 000, 000 $27
2, 000, 000 $27 1, 000, 000 $14.50 10, 000 .98 $1, 000
$9, 800, 000
$78, 300, 000
.1252, or 12.52%
E
E P D
=
+ + + +
=
=
11-11
2, 000, 000 $27
2, 000, 000 $27 1, 000, 000 $14.50 10, 000 .98 $1, 000
$14, 500, 000
$78, 300, 000
.1852, or 18.52%
E
E P D
=
+ + + +
=
=
11-14
( ) WACC 1
6, 500, 000 $14
14%
6, 500, 000 $14 $10, 000, 000 25, 000 $1, 000 .9
$10, 000, 000
10%
6, 500, 000 $14 $10, 000, 000 25, 000 $1, 000 .9
25, 000 $1, 000 .9
6, 500, 000 $14 $10, 000, 000 25,
E P D C
E P D
i i i T
E P D E P D E P D
= + +
+ + + + + +
=
+ +
+
+ +
+
+ +
( )
( )
7.25% 1 .34
000 $1, 000 .9
$91, 000, 000
14%
$91, 000, 000 $10, 000, 000 22, 500, 000
$10, 000, 000
10%
$91, 000, 000 $10, 000, 000 22, 500, 000
22, 500, 000
7.25% 1 .34
$91, 000, 000 $10, 000, 000 22, 500, 000
..7368 14% .0810
=
+ +
+
+ +
+
+ +
= + ( ) 10% .1822 7.25% 1 .34
11.9973%
+
=
11-24
( )
| |
( )
| |
( )
| |
( )
| |
For Project A:
4% 0.5 7%
7.5%
For Project B:
4% 1.2 7%
12.4%
For Project C:
4% 1.4 7%
13.8%
For Project D:
4% 1.6 7%
15.2%
E f E M f
E f E M f
E f E M f
E f E M f
i i E i i
i i E i i
i i E i i
i i E i i
|
|
|
|
( = +
= +
=
( = +
= +
=
( = +
= +
=
( = +
= +
=
If Project As expected return of 8% had been compared to the project-specific required
return of 7.5%, it would have been accepted. Therefore, Project A would have been
incorrectly rejected if the firm-wide WACC had been used as its benchmark.