EPC Contracts
EPC Contracts
EPC Contracts
CONTRACTS MANAGER
CONSTRUCTION
PM
BASIC REQUIREMENTS OF CLIENT / EMPLOYER: 1. 2. 3. 4. Definition of the Project: Usage, Function, Areas, Type etc.. Quality of Project Project Duration Budget used for all stages to deliver the Project.
When Client / Employer decides for an EPC Contracts: 1. Insure that Cost is known at the Start of the Project 2. Protected against variations, price changes, design change etc..
Reference: Professional References | Wikipedia | Construction Contracts
3. Ensure quality and reduces practical issues faced in other ways 4. Single party for design, construction, testing, etc... This will reduce communications, time for decisions, etc... 5. Easy Work very transparent with one party only 6. Reduce stress and Risk for the Owner. 1. A SINGLE POINT OF RESPONSIBILITY The contractor is responsible for all DESIGN, ENGINEERING, PROCUREMENT, CONSTRUCTION, and COMMISSIONING & TESTING ACTIVITIES. Therefore, if any problems occur the projects Client need only look to one party - the contractor - to both fix the problem and provide compensation. As a result, if the contractor is a JV comprising several entities the EPC Contract must state that those entities are jointly and severally liable to the Client. 2. A FIXED CONTRACT PRICE Risk of cost overruns and the benefit of any cost savings are to the contractors account. The contractor usually has a limited ability to claim additional money which is limited to circumstances where the Client has delayed the contractor or has ordered design changes to the works. 3. A FIXED COMPLETION DATE EPC Contracts include a guaranteed completion date that is either a fixed date or a fixed period after the commencement of the EPC Contract. If this date is not met the contractor is liable for delay liquidated damages (DLDs). DLDs are designed to compensate the Client for loss and damage suffered as a result of late completion of the facility. To be enforceable in common law jurisdictions, DLDs must be a genuine pre-estimate of the loss or damage that the Client will suffer if the facility is not completed by the target completion date. The genuine pre-estimate is determined by reference to the time the contract was entered into. DLDs are usually expressed as a rate per day which represents the estimated extra costs incurred (such as extra insurance, supervision fees and financing charges) and losses suffered (revenue forgone) for each day of delay. In addition, the EPC Contract must provide for the contractor to be granted an extension of time when it is delayed by the acts or omissions of the Client. The extension of time mechanism and reasons why it must be included are discussed below. 4. PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES The Clients revenue will be earned by operating the facility. Therefore, it is vital that the facility performs as required in term of output, efficiency, and reliability. Therefore, EPC Contracts contain performance guarantees backed by performance liquidated damages (PLDs) payable by the contractor if it fail s to meet the performance guarantees.
The performance guarantees usually comprise a guaranteed production capacity, quality, and efficiency. PLDs must also be a genuine pre-estimate of the loss and damage that the project company will suffer over the life of the project if the facility does not achieve the specified performance guarantees. As with DLDs, the genuine pre-estimate is determined by reference to the time the contract was signed. PLDs are usually a net present value (NPV) (less expense) calculation of the revenue forgone over the life of the project. For example, for an Oxygen plant if the production rate of Oxygen is 50 tons less than the specification, the PLDs are designed to compensate the Client for the revenue forgone over the life of the project by being unable to sell that 50 tons of Oxygen. PLDs and the performance guarantee regime and its interface with the DLDs and the delay regime is discussed in more detail in different Documents. 5. LIMITS ON LIABILITY As mentioned above most EPC contractors will not, as a matter of policy, enter into contracts with unlimited liability. Therefore, EPC Contracts for process plant projects limit the contractors liability at a percentage of the contract price. This varies from project to project; however, a limit of 100% of the contract price is common. In addition, there are normally sub-limits on the contractors liquidated damages liability. For example, DLDs and PLDs might each be limited at 20% of the contract price with an overall limit on both types of liquidated damages of 30% of the contract price. 6. SECURITY It is standard for the contractor to provide performance security to protect the Client if the contractor does not comply with its obligations under the EPC Contract. The security takes a number of forms including: Bank guarantee or bond for a percentage, normally in the range of 5-15%, of the contract price. The actual percentage will depend on a number of factors including the other security available to the Client, the payment schedule (because the greater the percentage of the contract price unpaid by the Client at the time it is most likely to draw on security i.e.: to satisfy DLD and PLD obligations the smaller the bank guarantee can be), the identity of the contractor and the risk of it not properly performing its obligations, the price of the bank guarantee and the extent of the technology risk. Advance payment guarantee, if an advance payment is made, and a parent company guarantee - this is a guarantee from the ultimate parent (or other suitable related entity) of the contractor which provides that it will perform the contractors obligations if, for whatever reason, the contractor does not perform.
7. VARIATIONS The Client has the right to order variations and agree to variations suggested by the contractor. If the Client wants the right to omit works either in their entirety or to be able to engage a different contractor this must be stated specifically. In addition, a properly drafted variations clause should make provision for how the price of a variation is to be determined. 8. DEFECTS LIABILITY The contractor is usually obliged to repair defects that occur in the 12 to 24 months following completion of the performance testing. Defects liability clauses can be tiered. That is the clause can provide for one period for the entire facility and a second, extended period, for more critical items. 9. PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION Unlike a traditional construction contract, an EPC Contract usually contains a performance specification. The performance specification details the performance criteria that the contractor must meet. However, it does not dictate how they must be met. This is left to the contractor to determine. A delicate balance must be maintained. The specification must be detailed enough to ensure the Client knows what it is contracting to receive but not so detailed that if problems arise the contractor can argue they are not its responsibility. Whilst there are, as described above, numerous advantages to using an EPC Contract, there are some disadvantages. These include the fact that it can result in a higher contract price than alternative contractual structures. This higher price is a result of a number for factors not least of which is the allocation of almost all the construction risk to the contractor. This has a number of consequences, one of which is that the contractor will have to factor into its price the cost of absorbing those risks . This will result in the contractor building contingencies into the contract price for events that are unforeseeable and/or unlikely to occur. If those contingencies were not included the contract price would be lower. The Client should allocate risk in a sophisticated way that delivers the most efficient result. For example, if a project is being undertaken in an area with unknown geology and without the time to undertake a proper geotechnical survey, the Client may be best served by bearing the site condition risk itself as it will mean the contractor does not have to price a contingency it has no way of quantifying.
This approach can lower the risk premium paid by the Clients. Alternatively, the opposite may be true. The Client may wish to pay for the contingency in return for passing off the risk which quantifies and limits its exposure. This type of analysis must be undertaken on all major risks prior to going out to tender. Another consequence of the risk allocation is the fact that there are relatively few engineering and construction companies that can and are willing to enter into EPC Contracts. As mentioned in the Introduction some bad publicity and a tightening insurance market have further reduced the pool of potential EPC Contractors. The scarcity of EPC Contractors can also result in relatively high contract prices. Obviously, ensuring the project is completed satisfactorily is usually more important than protecting the integrity of the contractual structure. However, if a Client interferes with the execution of the works they will, in most circumstances, have the worst of both worlds. They will have a contract that exposes them to liability for time and costs incurred as a result of their interference without any corresponding ability to hold the contractor liable for delays in completion or defective performance. The same problems occur even where the EPC Contract is drafted to give the Client the ability to intervene. In many circumstances, regardless of the actual drafting, if the Client becomes involved in determining how the contractor executes the works then the contractor will be able to argue that it is not liable for either delayed or defective performance. As a result, it is vitally important that great care is taken in selecting the contractor and in ensuring the contractor has sufficient knowledge and expertise to execute the works. Given the significant monetary value of EPC Contracts, and the potential adverse consequences if problems occur during construction, the lowest price should not be the only factor used when selecting contractors. 10. RISK MANAGEMENT Risk is an uncertain event or condition having a positive or negative effect on project objective, i.e., Scope, Cost, Schedule, and Quality. Following are the main risks: Delays in Project Development, Legal & Regulatory Risks, Operational & Maintenance Risks, Force Majeure Risks, Environmental Risks, Cost Overrun Risks, Financial Risks, Market Risks, Commercial Risks, Political Risks, Social Risks, Technological Risks.