Sex Education
Sex Education
Sex Education
Running head:
Sex Education 2
Erin Boyle
Erica Ely
Christina Karanasos
Heidi Long
Jennifer Pena
Devyn Shook
Rebecca Waggoner
The purpose of this paper is to explore the issue of sex education in the public
school system. This is an important issue because teens are becoming sexually active at
younger ages. The incidence of teenage sex and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) is
alarmingly high. By age seventeen, over 50 percent of teenagers have engaged in oral
sex, between five percent and 30 percent of thirteen-year-olds have had sexual
intercourse, and more than nine million new cases of STDs are contracted by Americans
between the ages of fifteen and twenty-four every year (Shafer, 2006). The amount of
teenage pregnancies is also very alarming. “The teen pregnancy rate in the U.S. is the
highest among the most developed countries in the world… and despite recent declines in
(Planned Parenthood, 2006)”. Sex education for kids and teens has been an extremely
controversial topic, mostly due to the fact that there are many conflicting views between
parents and educators. Most people agree that American school systems need to have
some kind of sexual education program, and most do, the question is, what kind?
One part of a nurses’ role is to act as an educator. This means ensuring that their
clients have proper information when it comes to sexual education. Nurses are currently
seeing more and more young people presenting with sexual health issues that may
potentially take a negative toll on the rest of their lives. It is frustrating for nurses to see
these kids suffer because they had incorrect information, or no information on the
consequences of sexual activity. School nurses play a large role in the sex education (sex
ed) programs in schools. School personnel look to school nurses for providing accurate
There are currently two different types of sex ed programs being taught in the
abstinence while also teaching kids about STDs and contraceptive devices. Abstinence
only programs teach kids that the proper thing to do is to abstain from having sex until
unprotected sex. Abstinence only programs are the only kind of programs being funded
by the federal government, and the Bush administration spends approximately 200
million dollars on these programs every year (Robb, 2007). Planned Parenthood is
encouraging states to refuse to accept federal funding so that they can continue or start to
teach comprehensive programs, and states are doing so (Craig, 2007). Despite this fact,
the majority of states are only teaching abstinence-only programs. We will now look
further into the programs that are being taught in our schools, the content of these
programs, parental viewpoints and the rights of parents in participating in their children’s
sexual education.
Comprehensive Sex Education is one of the two major viewpoints that are
in accordance with information on contraceptive devices and other birth control methods.
The main goals of this educational teaching style is to reduce the number of teen
Advocates for Youth, “Comprehensive sex ed stresses abstinence and includes age-
addresses the issue of teen pregnancies and STDs in regards to Comprehensive Sex
Education by stating that “Comprehensive Sex Education teaches about abstinence as the
best method for avoiding STDs and unintended pregnancy, but also teaches about
condoms and contraception to reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy and of infection
with STDs, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). It also teaches interpersonal
and communication skills and helps young people explore their own values, goals, and
options.” (“Sex education programs,” n.d.) Another source describes Comprehensive Sex
caretakers as partners with teachers” (Constantine, Jerman, & Huang, 2007). This
definition provides a broader view of the topical outline and focus of comprehensive sex
education as opposed to the definition commonly used by the media and politicians that
protection from those that strategically omit these topics” (Constantine et al., 2007).
Since 1991, US teen pregnancy rates have seen a decrease in number (Hulton,
2007). Although one study found that “there was a substantial retreat from a
comprehensive approach to sex education from 1995 to 2002” (Lindberg, Santelli, &
Singh, 2006), another source stated that “[d]ramatic improvements in contraceptive use
occurred between 1995 and 2002” (Santelli, Lindberg, Finer, & Singh, 2007). This same
Sex Education 6
study concluded that the “declining adolescent pregnancy rates in the United States
between 1995 and 2002 were primarily attributable to improved contraceptive use. The
decline in pregnancy risk among 18- and 19-year-olds was entirely attributable to
increased contraceptive use. Decreased sexual activity was responsible for about one
quarter (23 percent) of the decline among 15- to 17-year-olds, and increased
contraceptive use was responsible for the remainder (77 percent)” (Santelli et al., 2007).
particularly among younger teenagers; however, the scientific evidence shows that, in
al., 2007). Another source pointed out that “[b]ased on over 15 years of research, the
evidence shows that comprehensive sexuality education programs for youth that
encourage abstinence, promote appropriate condom use, and teach sexual communication
skills reduce HIV-risk behavior and also delay the onset of sexual intercourse.” (“Based
on the research”, 2005). It stands to reason, based on recent studies, that a continued
multifaceted topic. There is a wide spread agreement of the teaching of abstinence. The
disagreement stems from whether it should be the only thing taught. Many parents would
prefer their children remain abstinent until marriage; however, statistics show that they
are realistic in understanding that this is not always likely. This is where the approval of
comprehensive sexual education stems from; parents want their children to be as safe and
well informed as possible if they do choose to have sexual intercourse. The Kaiser
Sex Education 7
Family Foundation conducted a survey of parents and the public regarding their opinions
on sex education among other things. When asked how they, the parents surveyed,
thought the funding for sex ed programs that come from the government should be used,
67 percent replied that, “The money should be used to fund more comprehensive sex
education programs that include information on how to obtain and use condoms and other
contraceptives.” (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2004) Among the topics that the survey
asked parents about, 96 percent thought that the basic information of how babies come
about, pregnancy and birth are appropriate for sex education programs. Ninety eight
percent of parents agreed that AIDS, HIV and STD information is appropriate to include
in such classes; 94 percent also wanted students to be taught how and where to be tested
for such diseases. Ninety four percent wanted information on birth control and methods
wanted information included on where to get such resources; although only 71 percent
wanted students made aware that they do not need parental permission to obtain such
resources. Though parents also showed great support of topics other than just abstinence,
they also highly supported teaching that emphasizes abstinence. Ninety five percent of
those surveyed wanted teachings to include the idea of waiting until you are older to have
sexual intercourse. Eighty two percent of respondents also stated that sexual education in
school makes it easier for them to discuss sexual issues with their children.
The legal rights of parents in such matters are complex. Laws on the issues of
sexuality education vary from state to state. In some states, abstinence is the only thing
that may be taught within public schools and much of the funding from the government
goes only towards programs that teach abstinence. Sometimes parental permission is
Sex Education 8
required for a child’s participation in sex education and sometimes it is not. This is an
issue that is still developing legally and does not yet have a clear set of guidelines on
what is and what is not allowed, as well as what the rights of parents are.
In 1996, the Welfare Reform Act was set up by congress. This act allocated 550
million dollars a year, for five years, to promote and teach abstinence as the only morally
correct option for young adults to live by. In 1998, The Abstinence-Only Sexual
Education programs were put into effect in schools all throughout the United States. The
program is defined by Section 510(b) of Title V of the Social Security Act, P.L. 104-193.
This act lists eight rules that outline exactly what the program teaches. “For the purposes
program which:
1. has as its exclusive purpose teaching the social, psychological, and health gains to
3. teaches that abstinence from sexual activity is the only certain way to avoid out-
problems;
5. teaches that sexual activity outside the context of marriage is likely to have
7. teaches young people how to reject sexual advances and how alcohol and drug
The program usually forces teachers to censor information about condoms and
birth control, as well as any information about other methods of contraceptives and/or
protection against STDs. This means that if a student asks a question regarding any of
these subjects, the teacher is not permitted to answer. The only acceptable form of
information regarding the use of condoms, is listing the failure rates. Abstinence-Only
Education also teaches that there can be harmful physical, social, and psychological
consequences for individuals who engage in pre-marital sexual activity. It does not
also suggests that STDs are inevitable if an individual engages in pre-marital sexual
activity.
Although this is a very controversial issue, there are some who say that positive
effects have come out of this program. In 2005, a study was done on seventh, eighth, and
ninth graders in a south metro Atlanta school, to compare the effects of the past sexual
health textbook versus the new abstinence-only “Choosing the Best” textbook program.
Over a one-year period, the study showed that there was a 47 percent decrease in the
initiation of teen sex. Another study was performed from 1995 to 1996 by Northwestern
University Medical School. “Graduates” evaluated 2,541 Illinois public school students
Sex Education 10
from the age of 13-16. After one year of the “Choosing the Best” program, 54 percent of
the students were no longer sexually active. The number is believed to have dropped due
The abstinence-only programs were formed due to the idea that if children are
taught ways to prevent pregnancy or protect against STDs, that this is promoting, and
encouraging pre-marital sex. It has never been doubted that abstinence is truly the only
way to protect oneself 100 percent of the time against STDs or unwanted pregnancy. The
choice we now have to make is how do we decide, as a nation, which way is “the right
guideline used to create new sexual education programs and evaluate existing ones. The
task force was comprised of 20 individuals in the fields of medicine, education, youth
services and sexuality. These guidelines are outlined in a 112 page document. These
guidelines do not only cover the sex part of sexual education, but many other areas such
as puberty, self esteem, body image, and development issues. These issues are just the tip
The guidelines set up by SIECUS for sexual education are based first upon four
different age levels. Next, the recommended curriculum is based on six key concepts
consisting of five to seven topics within each concept. Within each topic is a listed
curriculum guide for what should be covered according to the age appropriateness within
Before the curriculum itself, the task force says “The educators must be educated”
(Sexuality and Education Council of the United States, 2004). What does this mean?
Educating the educators means that those teaching the curriculum must know the subject
matter well and be able to communicate it effectively. Teachers must be confident that
the message they are relaying makes a difference. Very few educators called to teach
sexual education will have had professional preparation thus making pre- and in-service
training invaluable. It is a must that sexual education teachers feel comfortable teaching
the content outlined within their school’s program. Determining sexual education content
can be a challenging process. The following is a small portion of the guidelines created
First and foremost, the task force defined the age groups for which they would
focus each of the key concepts and topics. The following tables explain the age groups
Table 1
Age levels as defined by SIECUS, 2004
Level 2 Preadolescence
Ages 9 through 12 (upper elementary school)
Level 4 Adolescence
Ages 15 through 18 (high school)
Table 2
Recommended Curriculum as defined by SIECUS, 2004
guidelines task force. Each topic goes into much more detail within each age appropriate
level.
Sexual education is as important for the parents at home as it is for the students
who receive it. As much as possible, parents need to be involved with their student’s sex
education at school. Parents can be involved by participating in parent night. Most often
schools offer a parent night where the curriculum that will be taught to their children can
be previewed. This preview may include videos, handouts, and activities that will be used
during the sexual education process. Often times, parents come away learning something
they didn’t know previously and feeling more comfortable knowing their children will be
only programs. Although both programs have advantages, we feel that in the long run
children and teens will have more positive outcomes with comprehensive information.
Sex Education 15
Teens are going to do what they want to do despite what we teach them. Hopefully,
having more knowledge will lead them to make smarter choices whether they chose to
References
Advocates for Youth. (n.d.). Sex education programs: Definitions & point-by-point
http://www.advocatesforyouth.org/rrr/definitions.htm
sex education is more effective at stopping the spread of HIV infection, says
(http://www.choosingthebest.org/research_results/index.html
Constantine, N.A., Jerman, P., & Huang, A.X. (2007) California parents’ preferences
http://proquest.umi.com.ezproxy.plu.edu/
Craig, Tim - Washington Post Staff Writer (2007, November 21). Va. GOP Assails
Drolet, Judy C., & Clark, Kay. (Eds.). (1994). The Sexuality Education
Associates.
program using a logic model framework. The Journal of School Nursing, 23(2).
Lindberg, L.D., Santelli, J.S., & Singh, S. (2006). Changes in formal sex education:
Pregnancy and Childbearing Among U.S. Teens. (2006, January 1). Updated on
http://www.plannedparenthood.org/news-articles-press/politics-policy-
issues/teen-pregnancy-6239.htm
Robb, Amanda (2007, October 18). Abstinence 1, S-Chip 0 :[Op-Ed]. New York
Times(Late Edition (east Coast)), p. A.31. Retrieved November 21, 2007, from
Santelli, J.S., Lindberg, L.D., Finer, L. B., & Singh, S. (2007). Explaining recent
2007. http://www.siecus.org/pubs/guidelines/guidelines.pdf
Schafer, Ethan D (2006, May). Training Your Staff to Manage the Challenges of