Cannabis
Cannabis
Cannabis
Cannabis
Cannabis
Common hemp
Conservation status
Least Concern (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: (unranked): (unranked): (unranked): Order: Family: Genus: Plantae Angiosperms Eudicots Rosids Rosales Cannabaceae Cannabis L. Species Cannabis sativa L. Cannabis indica Lam. (putative) Cannabis ruderalis Janisch. (putative) Cannabis (/knbs/) is a genus of flowering plants that includes three putative varieties, Cannabis sativa, Cannabis indica, and Cannabis ruderalis. These three taxa are indigenous to Central Asia, and South Asia. Cannabis has long been used for fibre (hemp), for seed and seed oils, for medicinal purposes, and as a recreational drug. Industrial hemp products are made from Cannabis plants selected to produce an abundance of fiber. To satisfy the UN Narcotics Convention, some Cannabis strains have been bred to produce minimal levels of THC, the principal
Cannabis psychoactive constituent responsible for the "high" associated with marijuana. Marijuana consists of the dried flowers of Cannabis plants selectively bred to produce high levels of THC and other psychoactive cannabinoids. Various extracts including hashish and hash oil are also produced from the plant.[1]
Etymology
The word cannabis is from Greek (knnabis) (see Latin cannabis),[2] which was originally Scythian or Thracian. It is related to the Persian kanab, the English canvas and possibly even to the English hemp (Old English hnep). In modern Hebrew, qannabs modern pronunciation: [kanabos] is used but maleh n modern pronunciation: [ma.ale aan] (smoke bringer) is the ancient term. Old Akkadian qunnabtu, Neo-Assyrian and Neo-Babylonian qunnabu were used to refer to the plant meaning "a way to produce smoke."
Woman selling cannabis and bhang in Guwahati, Assam, India.
Description
Cannabis is an annual, dioecious, flowering herb. The leaves are palmately compound or digitate, with serrate leaflets. The first pair of leaves usually have a single leaflet, the number gradually increasing up to a maximum of about thirteen leaflets per leaf (usually seven or nine), depending on variety and growing conditions. At the top of a flowering plant, this number again diminishes to a single leaflet per leaf. The lower leaf pairs usually occur in an opposite leaf arrangement and the upper leaf pairs in an alternate arrangement on the main stem of a mature plant. The leaves have a peculiar and diagnostic venation pattern that enables persons poorly familiar with the plant to distinguish a Cannabis leaf from unrelated species that have confusingly similar leaves (see illustration). As is common in serrated leaves, each serration has a central vein extending to its tip. However,the serration vein originates from lower down the central vein of the leaflet, typically opposite to the position of, not the first notch down, but the next notch. This means that on its way from the midrib of the leaflet to the point of the serration, the vein serving the tip of the serration passes close by the intervening notch. Sometimes the vein will actually pass tangent to the Underside of Cannabis sativa leaf, showing diagnostic venation notch, but often it will pass by at a small distance, and when that happens a spur vein (occasionally a pair of such spur veins) branches off and joins the leaf margin at the deepest point of the notch. This venation pattern varies slightly among varieties, but in general it enables one to tell Cannabis leaves from superficially similar leaves without difficulty and without special equipment. Tiny samples of Cannabis plants also can be identified with precision by microscopic examination of leaf cells and similar features, but that requires special expertise and equipment.[3] Cannabis normally has imperfect flowers, with staminate "male" and pistillate "female" flowers occurring on separate plants.[4] It is not unusual, however, for individual plants to bear both male and female flowers.[5] Although monoecious plants are often referred to as "hermaphrodites," true hermaphrodites (which are less common) bear staminate and pistillate structures on individual flowers, whereas monoecious plants bear male and female flowers at different locations on the same plant. Male flowers are normally borne on loose panicles, and female flowers are borne on racemes.[6] "At a very early period the Chinese recognized the Cannabis plant as dioecious,"[7] and the (ca. 3rd century BCE) Erya dictionary defined xi "male Cannabis" and fu (or ju ) "female Cannabis".[8]
Cannabis All known strains of Cannabis are wind-pollinated[9] and the fruit is an achene.[10] Most strains of Cannabis are short day plants, with the possible exception of C. sativa subsp. sativa var. spontanea (= C. ruderalis), which is commonly described as "auto-flowering" and may be day-neutral. Cannabis, like many organisms, is diploid, having a chromosome complement of 2n=20, although polyploid individuals have been artificially produced.[11] The first genome sequence of Cannabis, Cannabis growing as weeds at the foot of which is estimated to be 820 Mb in size, was published in 2011 by a Dhaulagiri. team of Canadian scientists.[12] The plant is believed to have originated in the mountainous regions northwest of the Himalayas. It is also known as hemp, although this term is often used to refer only to varieties of Cannabis cultivated for non-drug use. Cannabis plants produce a group of chemicals called cannabinoids, which produce mental and physical effects when consumed. Cannabinoids, terpenoids, and other compounds are secreted by glandular trichomes that occur most abundantly on the floral calyxes and bracts of female plants.[13] As a drug it usually comes in the form of dried flower buds (marijuana), resin (hashish), or various extracts collectively known as hashish oil. In the early 20th century, it became illegal in most of the world to cultivate or possess Cannabis for sale or personal use.
Taxonomy
The genus Cannabis was formerly placed in the Nettle (Urticaceae) or Mulberry (Moraceae) family, and later, along with the Humulus genus (hops), in a separate family, the Hemp family (Cannabaceae sensu stricto).[14] Recent phylogenetic studies based on cpDNA restriction site analysis and gene sequencing strongly suggest that the Cannabaceae sensu stricto arose from within the former Celtidaceae family, and that the two families should be merged to form a single monophyletic family, the Cannabaceae sensu lato.[15][16] Various types of Cannabis have been described, and variously classified as species, subspecies, or varieties:[17]
Cannabis sativa leaf, dorsal aspect
plants cultivated for fiber and seed production, described as low-intoxicant, non-drug, or fiber types. plants cultivated for drug production, described as high-intoxicant or drug types. escaped, hybridised, or wild forms of either of the above types. Cannabis plants produce a unique family of terpeno-phenolic compounds called cannabinoids, which produce the "high" one experiences from consuming marijuana. There are 483 identifiable chemical constituents known to exist in the cannabis plant, and at least 85 different cannabinoids have been isolated from the plant. The two cannabinoids
Cannabis usually produced in greatest abundance are cannabidiol (CBD) and/or 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), but only THC is psychoactive.[citation needed] Since the early 1970s, Cannabis plants have been categorized by their chemical phenotype or "chemotype," based on the overall amount of THC produced, and on the ratio of THC to CBD.[18] Although overall cannabinoid production is influenced by environmental factors, the THC/CBD ratio is genetically determined and remains fixed throughout the life of a plant.[19] Non-drug plants produce relatively low levels of THC and high levels of CBD, while drug plants produce high levels of THC and low levels of CBD. When plants of these two chemotypes cross-pollinate, the plants in the first filial (F1) generation have an intermediate chemotype and produce similar amounts of CBD and THC. Female plants of this chemotype may produce enough THC to be utilized for drug production.[20] Whether the drug and non-drug, cultivated and wild types of Cannabis constitute a single, highly variable species, or the genus is polytypic with more than one species, has been a subject of debate for well over two centuries. This is a contentious issue because there is no universally accepted definition of a species.[21] One widely applied criterion for species recognition is that species are "groups of actually or potentially interbreeding natural populations which are reproductively isolated from other such groups."[22] Populations that are physiologically capable of interbreeding, but morphologically or Top of Cannabis plant in vegetative growth stage genetically divergent and isolated by geography or ecology, are sometimes considered to be separate species. Physiological barriers to reproduction are not known to occur within Cannabis, and plants from widely divergent sources are interfertile. However, physical barriers to gene exchange (such as the Himalayan mountain range) might have enabled Cannabis gene pools to diverge before the onset of human intervention, resulting in speciation.[23] It remains controversial whether sufficient morphological and genetic divergence occurs within the genus as a result of geographical or ecological isolation to justify recognition of more than one species.[24][25][26]
Early classifications
The Cannabis genus was first classified using the "modern" system of taxonomic nomenclature by Carolus Linnaeus in 1753, who devised the system still in use for the naming of species.[27] He considered the genus to be monotypic, having just a single species that he named Cannabis sativa L. (L. stands for Linnaeus, and indicates the authority who first named the species). Linnaeus was familiar with European hemp, which was widely cultivated at the time. In 1785, noted evolutionary biologist Jean-Baptiste de Lamarck published a description of a second species of Cannabis, which he named Cannabis indica Lam.[28] Lamarck based his description of the newly named species on plant specimens collected in India. He described C. indica as having poorer fiber quality than C. sativa, but greater utility as an inebriant. Additional Cannabis species were proposed in the 19th century, including strains from China and Vietnam (Indo-China) assigned Relative size of varieties of Cannabis the names Cannabis chinensis Delile, and Cannabis gigantea Delile ex [29] Vilmorin. However, many taxonomists found these putative species difficult to distinguish. In the early 20th century, the single-species concept was still widely accepted, except in the Soviet Union where Cannabis continued to be the subject of active taxonomic study. The name Cannabis indica was listed in various Pharmacopoeias, and was widely used to designate Cannabis suitable for the manufacture of medicinal preparations.[30]
Cannabis
20th century
In 1924, Russian botanist D.E. Janichevsky concluded that ruderal Cannabis in central Russia is either a variety of C. sativa or a separate species, and proposed C. sativa L. var. ruderalis Janisch. and Cannabis ruderalis Janisch. as alternative names. In 1929, renowned plant explorer Nikolai Vavilov assigned wild or feral populations of Cannabis in Afghanistan to C. indica Lam. var. kafiristanica Vav., and ruderal populations in Europe to C. sativa L. var. spontanea Vav. In 1940, Russian botanists Serebriakova and Sizov proposed a complex classification in which they also recognized C. sativa and C. indica as Cannabis ruderalis separate species. Within C. sativa they recognized two subspecies: C. sativa L. subsp. culta Serebr. (consisting of cultivated plants), and C. sativa L. subsp. spontanea (Vav.) Serebr. (consisting of wild or feral plants). Serebriakova and Sizov split the two C. sativa subspecies into 13 varieties, including four distinct groups within subspecies culta. However, they did not divide C. indica into subspecies or varieties.[31] This excessive splitting of C. sativa proved too unwieldy, and never gained many adherents. In the 1970s, the taxonomic classification of Cannabis took on added significance in North America. Laws prohibiting Cannabis in the United States and Canada specifically named products of C. sativa as prohibited materials. Enterprising attorneys for the defense in a few drug busts argued that the seized Cannabis material may not have been C. sativa, and was therefore not prohibited by law. Attorneys on both sides recruited botanists to provide expert testimony. Among those testifying for the prosecution was Dr. Ernest Small, while Dr. Richard E. Schultes and others testified for the defense. The botanists engaged in heated debate (outside of court), and both camps impugned the other's integrity. The defense attorneys were not often successful in winning their case, because the intent of the law was clear.[32] In 1976, Canadian botanist Ernest Small[33] and American taxonomist Arthur Cronquist published a taxonomic revision that recognizes a single species of Cannabis with two subspecies: C. sativa L. subsp. sativa, and C. sativa L. subsp. indica (Lam.) Small & Cronq. The authors hypothesized that the two subspecies diverged primarily as a result of human selection; C. sativa subsp. sativa was presumably selected for traits that enhance fiber or seed production, whereas C. sativa subsp. indica was primarily selected for drug production. Within these two subspecies, Small and Cronquist described C. sativa L. subsp. sativa var. spontanea Vav. as a wild or escaped variety of low-intoxicant Cannabis, and C. sativa subsp. indica var. kafiristanica (Vav.) Small & Cronq. as a wild or escaped variety of the high-intoxicant type. This classification was based on several factors including interfertility, chromosome uniformity, chemotype, and numerical analysis of phenotypic characters.[34] Professors William Emboden, Loran Anderson, and Harvard botanist Richard E. Schultes and coworkers also conducted taxonomic studies of Cannabis in the 1970s, and concluded that stable morphological differences exist that support recognition of at least three species, C. sativa, C. indica, and C. ruderalis.[35][36][37][38] For Schultes, this was a reversal of his previous interpretation that Cannabis is monotypic, with only a single species.[39] According to Schultes' and Anderson's descriptions, C. sativa is tall and laxly branched with relatively narrow leaflets, C. indica is shorter, conical in shape, and has relatively wide leaflets, and C. ruderalis is short, branchless, and grows wild in central Asia. This taxonomic interpretation was embraced by Cannabis aficionados who commonly distinguish narrow-leafed "sativa" drug strains from wide-leafed "indica" drug strains.[40]
Cannabis
Continuing research
Molecular analytical techniques developed in the late 20th century are being applied to questions of taxonomic classification. This has resulted in many reclassifications based on evolutionary systematics. Several studies of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and other types of genetic markers have been conducted on drug and fiber strains of Cannabis, primarily for plant breeding and forensic purposes.[41][42][43][44][45] Dutch Cannabis researcher E.P.M. de Meijer and coworkers described some of their RAPD studies as showing an "extremely high" degree of genetic polymorphism between and within populations, suggesting a high degree of potential variation for selection, even in heavily selected hemp cultivars. They also commented that these analyses confirm the continuity of the Cannabis gene pool throughout the studied accessions, and provide further confirmation that the genus comprises a single species, although theirs was not a systematic study per se. Karl W. Hillig, a graduate student in the laboratory of long-time Cannabis researcher Paul G. Mahlberg[46] at Indiana University, conducted a systematic investigation of genetic, morphological, and chemotaxonomic variation among 157 Cannabis accessions of known geographic origin, including fiber, drug, and feral populations. In 2004, Hillig and Mahlberg published a chemotaxomic analysis of cannabinoid variation in their Cannabis germplasm collection. They used gas chromatography to determine cannabinoid content and to infer allele frequencies of the gene that controls CBD and THC production within the studied populations, and concluded that the patterns of cannabinoid variation support recognition of C. sativa and C. indica as separate species, but not C. ruderalis. The authors assigned fiber/seed landraces and feral populations from Europe, central Asia, and Asia Minor to C. sativa. Narrow-leaflet and wide-leaflet drug accessions, southern and eastern Asian hemp accessions, and feral Himalayan populations were assigned to C. indica. In 2005, Hillig published a genetic analysis of the same set of accessions (this paper was the first in the series, but was delayed in publication), and proposed a three-species classification, recognizing C. sativa, C. indica, and (tentatively) C. ruderalis. In his doctoral dissertation published the same year, Hillig stated that principal components analysis of phenotypic (morphological) traits failed to differentiate the putative species, but that canonical variates analysis resulted in a high degree of discrimination of the putative species and infraspecific taxa.[47] Another paper in the series on chemotaxonomic variation in the terpenoid content of the essential oil of Cannabis revealed that several wide-leaflet drug strains in the collection had relatively high levels of certain sesquiterpene alcohols, including guaiol and isomers of eudesmol, that set them apart from the other putative taxa.[48] Hillig concluded that the patterns of genetic, morphological, and chemotaxonomic variation support recognition of C. sativa and C. indica as separate species. He also concluded there is little support to treat C. ruderalis as a separate species from C. sativa at this time, but more research on wild and weedy populations is needed because they were underrepresented in their collection. In September 2005, New Scientist reported that researchers at the Canberra Institute of Technology had identified a new type of Cannabis based on analysis of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA.[49] The New Scientist story, which was picked up by many news agencies and web sites, indicated that the research was to be published in the journal Forensic Science International.[50]
Popular usage
The scientific debate regarding taxonomy has had little effect on the terminology in widespread use among cultivators and users of drug-type Cannabis. Cannabis aficionados recognize three distinct types based on such factors as morphology, native range, aroma, and subjective psychoactive characteristics. Sativa is the most widespread variety, which is usually tall, laxly branched, and found in warm lowland regions. Indica designates shorter, bushier plants adapted to cooler climates and highland environments. Ruderalis is the informal name for the short plants that grow wild in Europe and central Asia. Breeders, seed companies, and cultivators of drug type Cannabis often describe the ancestry or gross phenotypic characteristics of cultivars by categorizing them as "pure indica," "mostly indica," "indica/sativa," "mostly sativa", or "pure sativa."
Cannabis
Reproduction
Breeding systems
Cannabis is predominantly dioecious,[51] although many monoecious varieties have been described.[52] Subdioecy (the occurrence of monoecious individuals and dioecious individuals within the same population) is widespread.[53][54] Many populations have been described as sexually labile.[55][56]
As a result of intensive selection in cultivation, Cannabis exhibits many sexual phenotypes that can be described in terms of the ratio of female to male flowers occurring in the individual, or typical in the cultivar.[57] Dioecious varieties are preferred for drug production, where typically the female flowers are used. Dioecious varieties are also preferred for textile fiber production, whereas monoecious varieties are preferred for pulp and paper production. It has been suggested that the presence of monoecy can be used to differentiate licit crops of monoecious hemp from illicit drug crops. However, sativa strains often produce monoecious individuals, probably as a result of inbreeding.
Since then, many different types of sex determination systems have been discovered, particularly in plants. Dioecy is relatively uncommon in the plant kingdom, and a very low percentage of dioecious plant species have been
Cannabis determined to use the XY system. In most cases where the XY system is found it is believed to have evolved recently and independently.[60] Since the 1920s, a number of sex determination models have been proposed for Cannabis. Ainsworth describes sex determination in the genus as using "an X/autosome dosage type". The question of whether heteromorphic sex chromosomes are indeed present is most conveniently answered if such chromosomes were clearly visible in a karyotype. Cannabis was one of the first plant species to be karyotyped; however, this was in a period when karyotype preparation was primitive by modern standards (see History of Cytogenetics). Heteromorphic sex chromosomes were reported to occur in staminate individuals of dioecious "Kentucky" hemp, but were not found in pistillate individuals of the same variety. Dioecious "Kentucky" hemp was assumed to use an XY mechanism. Heterosomes were not observed in analyzed individuals of monoecious "Kentucky" hemp, nor in an unidentified German cultivar. These varieties were assumed to have sex chromosome composition XX.[61] According to other researchers, no modern karyotype of Cannabis had been published as of 1996.[62] Proponents of the XY system state that Y chromosome is slightly larger than the X, but difficult to differentiate cytologically.[63] More recently, Sakamoto and various co-authors[64][65] have used RAPD to isolate several genetic marker sequences that they name Male-Associated DNA in Cannabis (MADC), and which they interpret as indirect evidence of a male chromosome. Several other research groups have reported identification of male-associated markers using RAPD and AFLP.[66][67][68] Ainsworth commented on these findings, stating, "It is not surprising that male-associated markers are relatively abundant. In dioecious plants where sex chromosomes have not been identified, markers for maleness indicate either the presence of sex chromosomes which have not been distinguished by cytological methods or that the marker is tightly linked to a gene involved in sex determination. "
Environmental sex determination is known to occur in a variety of species.[69] Many researchers have suggested that sex in Cannabis is determined or strongly influenced by environmental factors. Ainsworth reviews that treatment with auxin and ethylene have feminizing effects, and that treatment with cytokinins and gibberellins have masculinizing effects. It has been reported that sex can be reversed in Cannabis using chemical treatment.[70] A PCR-based method for the detection of female-associated DNA polymorphisms by genotyping has been developed.[71]
Cannabis
Hemp
The term Hemp is used to name the durable soft fiber from the Cannabis Plant stem (stalk). Cannabis sativa cultivars are used for fibers due to their long stems; Sativa varieties may grow more than six metres tall. However, hemp can refer to any industrial or foodstuff product that is not intended for use as a drug. Many countries regulate limits for psychoactive compound (THC) concentrations in products labeled as hemp. Hemp is valuable in tens of thousands of commercial products, especially as fibre ranging from paper, cordage, construction material and textiles in general, to clothing. Hemp is stronger and longer-lasting than cotton. It also is a useful source of foodstuffs (hemp milk, hemp seed, hemp oil) and biofuels. Hemp has been used by many civilizations, from China to Europe (and later North America) during the last 12,000 years. In modern times novel applications and improvements have been explored with modest commercial success.
Psychoactive drug
Cannabis is a popular recreational drug around the world, only behind alcohol, caffeine and tobacco. In the United States alone, it is believed that over 100 million Americans have tried Cannabis, with 25 million Americans having used it within the past year. The psychoactive effects of Cannabis are known to have a biphasic nature. Primary psychoactive effects include a Comparison of physical harm and dependence regarding various drugs. state of relaxation, and to a lesser degree, euphoria from its main psychoactive compound, tetrahydrocannabinol. Secondary psychoactive effects, such as a facility for philosophical thinking, introspection and metacognition have been reported amongst cases of anxiety and paranoia. Finally, the tertiary psychoactive effects of the drug cannabis, can include an increase in heart rate and hunger, believed to be caused by 11-OH-THC, a psychoactive metabolite of THC produced in the liver. Normal cognition is restored after approximately three hours for larger doses via a smoking pipe, bong or vaporizer. However, if a large amount is taken orally the effects may last much longer. After 24 hours to a few days, minuscule psychoactive effects may be felt, depending on dosage, frequency and tolerance to the drug.
Cannabis
10 Various forms of the drug cannabis exist, including extracts such as hashish and hash oil which, because of appearance, are more susceptible to adulterants when left unregulated. The plant Cannabis sativa is known to cause more of a "high" by stimulating hunger and by producing a rather more comedic, or energetic feeling. Conversely, the Cannabis indica plant is known to cause more of a "stoned" or meditative feeling, possibly because of a higher CBD to THC ratio. Cannabidiol (CBD), which has no psychotropic effects by itself (although sometimes showing a small stimulant effect, similar to caffeine), attenuates, or reduces the higher anxiety levels caused by THC alone.
According to Delphic analysis by British researchers in 2007, Cannabis has a lower risk factor for dependence compared to both nicotine and alcohol. However, everyday use of Cannabis can in some cases be correlated with psychological withdrawal symptoms such as irritability and insomnia, and evidence could suggest that if a user experiences stress, the likeliness of getting a panic attack increases because of an increase of THC metabolites. However, Cannabis withdrawal symptoms are typically mild and are never life-threatening.
Cannabis Museum in Amsterdam
Medical use
A synthetic form of the main psychoactive cannabinoid in Cannabis, 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), is used as a treatment for a wide range of medical conditions. In the United States, although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) does acknowledge that "there has been considerable interest in its use for the treatment of a number of conditions, including glaucoma, AIDS wasting, neuropathic pain, treatment of spasticity associated with multiple sclerosis, and chemotherapy-induced nausea," the agency has not approved "medical marijuana". There are currently 2 oral forms of cannabis (cannabinoids) available by prescription in the United States for nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy: dronabinol (Marinol) and nabilone (Cesamet). Dronabinol is also approved for the treatment of anorexia associated with AIDS.Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) The FDA does facilitate scientific investigations into the medical uses of cannabinoids. Another potential use for medical cannabis is movement disorders. Cannabis is frequently reported to reduce the muscle spasms associated with multiple sclerosis; this has been acknowledged by the Institute of Medicine, but it noted that these abundant anecdotal reports are not well-supported by clinical data. Evidence from animal studies suggests that there is a possible role for cannabinoids in the treatment of certain types of epileptic seizures. A synthetic version of the major active compound in Cannabis, THC, is available in capsule form as the prescription drug dronabinol (Marinol) in many countries. The prescription drug Sativex, an extract of cannabis administered as a sublingual spray, has been approved in Canada for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Cannabis was manufactured and sold by U.S. pharmaceutical companies from the 1880s through the 1930s, but the lack of documented information on the frequency and effectiveness of its use makes it difficult to evaluate its medicinal value in these forms. Cannabis was listed in the 19291930 Physicians' Catalog of the Pharmaceutical and Biological Products of Parke, Davis & Company as an active ingredient in ten products for cough, colic, neuralgia, cholera mordus and other medical conditions, as well as a "narcotic, analgesic, and sedative."[72] The 19291930 Physicians' Catalog also lists compound medications containing cannabis that in some cases were apparently formulated by medical doctors, in its "Pills and Tablets" section.[73] As cannabis is further legalized for medicinal use, it is possible that some of the foregoing compound medicines, whose formulas have been copied exactly as published, may be scientifically tested to determine whether they are effective medications. Writing in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, smoking cannabis from a pipe may
Cannabis significantly relieve chronic pain in patients with damaged nerves. A study on New Zealand support the claim that that long-term cannabis smoking increases the risk of lung cancer in young adults.[74]
11
Cannabis
12
References
[1] Erowid. 2006. Cannabis Basics (http:/ / www. erowid. org/ plants/ cannabis/ cannabis_basics. shtml). Retrieved on 25 February 2007 [2] "cannabis" OED Online. July 2009. Oxford University Press. 2009. http:/ / dictionary. oed. com/ cgi/ entry/ 50032466 [3] Watt, John Mitchell; Breyer-Brandwijk, Maria Gerdina: The Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Eastern Africa 2nd ed Pub. E & S Livingstone 1962 [4] Lebel-Hardenack, S. and S. R. Grant. 1997. Genetics of sex determination in flowering plants. Trends in Plant Science 2(4): 130136. [5] Cristiana Moliterni, V. M., L. Cattivelli, P. Ranalli. and G. Mandolino. 2005. The sexual differentiation of Cannabis sativa L.: A morphological and molecular study (http:/ / www. springerlink. com/ content/ t491042240h422v8/ ?p=702c2acbac6445a095ebaf968bca427d& pi=11). Euphytica 140(1-2): 95-106. Retrieved on 25 February 2007 [6] Bouquet, R. J. 1950. Cannabis (http:/ / www. unodc. org/ unodc/ bulletin/ bulletin_1950-01-01_4_page003. html). United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [7] Li Hui-Lin (1973). "The Origin and Use of Cannabis in Eastern Asia: Linguistic-Cultural Implications", Economic Botany 28.3:293-301, p. 294. [8] 13/99 and 13/133. In addition, 13/98 defined fen "Cannabis inflorescence" and 13/159 bo "wild Cannabis". [9] Clarke, Robert C. 1991. Marijuana Botany, 2nd ed. Ron Publishing, California. ISBN 0-914171-78-X [10] Small, E. 1975. Morphological variation of achenes of Cannabis. Canadian Journal of Botany 53(10): 978-987. [11] Small, E. 1972. Interfertility and chromosomal uniformity in Cannabis. Canadian Journal of Botany 50(9): 19471949. [12] van Bakel et al. 2011. The draft genome and transcriptome of Cannabis sativa. Genome Biology 2011, 12: R102. http:/ / genomebiology. com/ 2011/ 12/ 10/ R102 [13] Mahlberg, Paul G. and Eun Soo Kim. 2001. THC (tetrahyrdocannabinol) accumulation in glands of Cannabis (Cannabaceae) (http:/ / www. hempreport. com/ issues/ 17/ malbody17. html). The Hemp Report 3(17). Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [14] Schultes, R. E., A. Hofmann, and C. Rtsch. 2001. The nectar of delight. In: Plants of the Gods 2nd ed., Healing Arts Press, Rochester, Vermont, pp. 92101. ISBN 0-89281-979-0 [15] Song, B.-H., Wang, X.-Q., Li, F.-Z., and Hong, D.-Y. 2001. Further evidence for paraphyly of the Celtidaceae from the chloroplast gene matK (http:/ / springerlink. metapress. com/ content/ 9v01xfaw7t8qx288/ ?p=db82cdfc53554cc687fd999a5c7e371f& pi=8). Plant Systematics and Evolution 228(1-2): 107-115. [16] Sytsma, K. J., Morawetz, J., Pires, J. C., Nepokroeff, M., Conti, E., Zjhra, M., Hall, J. C., and Chase, M. W. 2002. Urticalean Rosids: circumscription, Rosid ancestry, and phylogenetics based on rbcL, trnL-F, and ndh-F sequences (http:/ / www. amjbot. org/ cgi/ content/ abstract/ 89/ 9/ 1531). American Journal of Botany 89(9): 15311546. [17] Small, Ernest. 1975. American law and the species problem in Cannabis: Science and semantics (http:/ / www. unodc. org/ unodc/ bulletin/ bulletin_1975-01-01_3_page002. html). Bulletin on Narcotics 27(3): 1-20. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [18] Small, E. and H. D. Beckstead. 1973. Common cannabinoid phenotypes in 350 stocks of Cannabis. Lloydia 36: 144165. [19] Etienne P. M. de Meijer, M. Bagatta, A. Carboni, P. Crucitti, V. M. Cristiana Moliterni, P. Ranalli, and G. Mandolino. 2003. The Inheritance of Chemical Phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. (http:/ / www. genetics. org/ cgi/ content/ abstract/ 163/ 1/ 335) Genetics 163(1): 335-346. Retrieved on 23 February 2007
Cannabis
[20] Hillig, Karl W. and Paul G. Mahlberg. 2004. A chemotaxonomic analysis of cannabinoid variation in Cannabis (Cannabaceae) (http:/ / www. amjbot. org/ cgi/ content/ abstract/ 91/ 6/ 966). American Journal of Botany 91(6): 966-975. Retrieved 22 February 2007. [21] Small, E. 1979. Fundamental aspects of the species problem in biology. In: The Species Problem in Cannabis, vol. 1: Science. Corpus Information Services, Toronto, Canada, pp. 563. ISBN 0-919217-11-7 [22] Rieger, R., A. Michaelis, and M. M. Green. 1991. Glossary of Genetics, 5th ed. Springer-Verlag, pp. 458459. ISBN 0-387-52054-6 [23] Hillig, Karl W. 2005. Genetic evidence for speciation in Cannabis (Cannabaceae) (http:/ / www. ingentaconnect. com/ content/ klu/ gres/ 2005/ 00000052/ 00000002/ 00004452). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52(2): 161-180. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [24] Small, E. 1975. On toadstool soup and legal species of marihuana (http:/ / www. botany. org/ PlantScienceBulletin/ psb-1975-21-3. php). Plant Science Bulletin 21(3): 34-39. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [25] Emboden, W. A. 1981. The genus Cannabis and the correct use of taxonomic categories. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 13: 1521. [26] Schultes, R. E., and A. Hofmann. 1980. Botany and Chemistry of Hallucinogens. C. C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, pp. 82116. ISBN 0-398-03863-5 [27] Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum 2: 1027. Salvius, Stockholm. [Facsimile edition, 19571959. Ray Society, London, U.K.] [28] de Lamarck, J.B. 1785. Encyclopdie Mthodique de Botanique, vol. 1, pt. 2. Paris, France, pp. 694695 [29] Small, E. and A. Cronquist. 1976. A practical and natural taxonomy for Cannabis. Taxon 25(4): 405435. [30] Winek, C. L. 1977. Some historical aspects of marijuana. Clinical Toxicology 10(2): 243-253. [31] Serebriakova T. Ya. and I. A. Sizov. 1940. Cannabinaceae Lindl. In: Vavilov N. I. (ed.), Kulturnaya Flora SSSR, vol. 5, Moscow-Leningrad, USSR, pp. 153. [in Russian] [32] Watts, G. 2006. Cannabis confusions (http:/ / www. bmj. com/ cgi/ reprint/ 332/ 7534/ 175. pdf)" BMJ 332: 175-176. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [33] Ernest Small (biography) (http:/ / pubs. nrc-cnrc. gc. ca/ cgi-bin/ rp/ rp2_gene_e?mlist-authors-small_e. html). National Research Council Canada. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [34] Small, E., P. Y. Jui, and L. P. Lefkovitch. 1976. A numerical taxonomic analysis of Cannabis with special reference to species delimitation. Systematic Botany 1(1): 67-84. [35] Schultes, R. E., W. M. Klein, T. Plowman, and T. E. Lockwood. 1974. Cannabis: an example of taxonomic neglect. Harvard University Botanical Museum Leaflets 23: 337367. [36] Anderson, L. C. (http:/ / www. bio. fsu. edu/ faculty-anderson. php) 1974. A study of systematic wood anatomy in Cannabis. Harvard University Botanical Museum Leaflets 24: 2936. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [37] Anderson, L. C. (http:/ / www. bio. fsu. edu/ faculty-anderson. php) 1980. Leaf variation among Cannabis species from a controlled garden. Harvard University Botanical Museum Leaflets 28: 6169. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [38] Emboden, W. A. 1974. Cannabis a polytypic genus. Economic Botany 28: 304-310. [39] Schultes, R. E. 1970. Random thoughts and queries on the botany of Cannabis. In: Joyce, C. R. B. and Curry, S. H. (eds), The Botany and Chemistry of Cannabis. J. & A. Churchill, London, pp. 1138. [40] Interview with Robert Connell Clarke (http:/ / www. norml. org. nz/ modules. php?name=News& file=print& sid=588). 1 Jan 2005. NORML, New Zealand. Retrieved on 19 February 2007 [41] Faeti, V., G. Mandolino, and P. Ranalli. 1996. Genetic diversity of Cannabis sativa germplasm based on RAPD markers. Plant Breeding 115: 367370. [42] Forapani, S., A. Carboni, C. Paoletti, V. M. Christiana Moliterni, P. Ranalli, and G. Mandolino. 2001. Comparison of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) varieties using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA markers (http:/ / crop. scijournals. org/ cgi/ content/ abstract/ 41/ 6/ 1682). Crop Science 41: 16821689. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [43] Mandolino, G. and Ranalli, P. 2002. The applications of molecular markers in genetics and breeding of hemp (https:/ / www. haworthpress. com/ store/ ArticleAbstract. asp?sid=WHMFTL5P4HRL8KGL589LPHULAS5X554F& ID=8157). Journal of Industrial Hemp 7(1): 7-23. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [44] Gilmore S., R. Peakall, and J. Roberts. 2003. Short tandem repeats (STR) DNA markers are hypervariable and informative in Cannabis sativa: implications for forensic investigations (http:/ / www. sciencedirect. com/ science?_ob=ArticleURL& _udi=B6T6W-478RNWR-7& _user=10& _coverDate=01/ 09/ 2003& _alid=541458074& _rdoc=2& _fmt=summary& _orig=search& _cdi=5041& _sort=d& _docanchor=& view=c& _ct=2& _acct=C000050221& _version=1& _urlVersion=0& _userid=10& md5=196333f36d13d0b0bacdfa4dbbfd5abe). Forensic Science International 131(1): 65-74. Retrieved on 25 February 2007 [45] Kojoka M., O. Iida, Y. Makino, S. Sekita, and M. Satake. 2002. DNA fingerprinting of Cannabis sativa using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification. Planta Medica 68(1): 60-63. [46] Dr. Paul G. Mahlberg's Cannabis Research (http:/ / www. naihc. org/ MahlbergArticles. html). North American Industrial Hemp Council. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [47] Hillig, Karl William. 2005. A systematic investigation of Cannabis. Doctoral Dissertation. Department of Biology, Indiana University. Bloomington, Indiana. Published by UMI (http:/ / wwwlib. umi. com/ dxweb/ gateway). Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [48] Hillig, Karl W. 2004. A chemotaxonomic analysis of terpenoid variation in Cannabis (http:/ / www. sciencedirect. com/ science?_ob=ArticleURL& _udi=B6T4R-4CPD4SG-1& _user=10& _coverDate=10/ 31/ 2004& _rdoc=1& _fmt=& _orig=search& _sort=d& view=c& _acct=C000050221& _version=1& _urlVersion=0& _userid=10& md5=9e491613fa59a0a2cb5b5a3f83cd3118). Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 32: 875-891. Retrieved on 23 February 2007
13
Cannabis
[49] 2005. Rasta lends its name to a third type of Cannabis (http:/ / www. newscientist. com/ article. ns?id=mg18725175. 200). New Scientist 2517: 12. Retrieved on 24 February 2007 [50] Gilmore, S., R. Peakall, and J. Robertson. 2007. Organelle DNA haplotypes reflect crop-use characteristics and geographic origins of Cannabis sativa (http:/ / www. sciencedirect. com/ science?_ob=ArticleURL& _udi=B6T6W-4N1SJSG-1& _user=10& _coverDate=10/ 25/ 2007& _rdoc=17& _fmt=high& _orig=browse& _srch=doc-info(#toc#5041#2007#998279997#667498#FLA#display#Volume)& _cdi=5041& _sort=d& _docanchor=& view=c& _ct=28& _acct=C000050221& _version=1& _urlVersion=0& _userid=10& md5=3a350afeb216af59a8129f894dce17ee). Forensic Science International 172(2-3): 179-190. Retrieved on 29 December 2008 [51] Ainsworth, C. 2000. Boys and girls come out to play: the molecular biology of dioecious plants (http:/ / aob. oxfordjournals. org/ cgi/ reprint/ 86/ 2/ 211). Annals of Botany 86(2): 211-221. Retrieved on 24 February 2007 [52] de Meijer, E. P. M. 1999. Cannabis germplasm resources. In: Ranalli P. (ed.). Advances in Hemp Research, Haworth Press, Binghamton, NY, pp. 131151. ISBN 1-56022-872-5 [53] Schumann, E., A. Peil, and W. E. Weber. 1999. Preliminary results of a German field trial with different hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) accessions (http:/ / www. springerlink. com/ content/ j0581734t3222674/ ?p=17537b5e5396490d82c1dd09c0da993d& pi=9). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 46(4): 399-407. Retrieved on 24 February 2007 [54] Ranalli, P. 2004. Current status and future scenarios of hemp breeding. Euphytica 140(1): 121-131. [55] Hirata, K. 1924. Sex reversal in hemp. Journal of the Society of Agriculture and Forestry 16: 145-168. [56] Schaffner, J. H. 1931. The fluctuation curve of sex reversal in staminate hemp plants induced by photoperiodicity. American Journal of Botany 18(6): 424-430. [57] Truta, E., E. Gille, E. Toth, and M. Maniu. 2002. Biochemical differences in Cannabis sativa L. depending on sexual phenotype (http:/ / jag. igr. poznan. pl/ 2002-Volume-43/ 4/ pdf/ 2002_Volume_43_4-451-462. pdf). Journal of Applied Genetics 43(4): 451-462. Retrieved on 24 February 2007 [58] Bridges, C. B. 1925. Sex in relation to chromosomes and genes. American Naturalist 59: 127-137. [59] Schaffner, J. H. 1929. Heredity and sex. Ohio Journal of Science 29 (1): 289-300. [60] Negrutiu, I., B. Vyskot, N. Barbacar, S. Georgiev, and F. Moneger. 2001. Dioecious plants; a key to the early events of sex chromosome evolution (http:/ / www. pubmedcentral. nih. gov/ articlerender. fcgi?artid=1540173). Plant Physiology 127 (4): 418-424. [61] Menzel, Margaret Y. 1964. Meiotic chromosomes of monoecious Kentucky hemp (Cannabis sativa). Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 91 (3): 193-205. [62] Shao Hong and Robert C. Clarke. 1996. Taxonomic studies of Cannabis in China (http:/ / www. hempfood. com/ IHA/ iha03207. html). Journal of the International Hemp Association 3 (2): 55-60. Retrieved on 25 February 2007 [63] Peil, A., H. Flachowsky, E. Schumann, and W. E. Weber. 2003. Sex-linked AFLP markers indicate a pseudoautosomal region in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107 (1): 102-109. [64] Sakamoto, K., K. Shimomura, Y. Komeda, H. Kamada, and S. Satoh. 1995. A male-associated DNA sequence in a dioecious plant, Cannabis sativa L. (http:/ / pcp. oxfordjournals. org/ cgi/ content/ abstract/ 36/ 8/ 1549) Plant & Cell Physiology 36(8): 15491554. Retrieved on 25 February 2007 [65] Sakamoto, K., T. Abe, T. Matsuyama, S. Yoshida, N. Ohmido, K. Fukui, and S. Satoh. 2005. RAPD markers encoding retrotransposable elements are linked to the male sex in Cannabis sativa L. (http:/ / article. pubs. nrc-cnrc. gc. ca/ ppv/ RPViewDoc?_handler_=HandleInitialGet& journal=gen& volume=48& calyLang=eng& articleFile=g05-056. pdf) Genome 48(5): 931-936. Retrieved on 25 February 2007 [66] Meijer, Etienne P. M. de, M. Bagatta, A. Carboni, P. Crucitti, V. M. Cristiana Moliterni, P. Ranalli, and G. Mandolino. 2003. The Inheritance of Chemical Phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. (http:/ / www. genetics. org/ cgi/ content/ abstract/ 163/ 1/ 335) Genetics 163(1): 335-346. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [67] Mandolino, Giuseppe and Paolo Ranalli. 2002. The applications of molecular markers in genetics and breeding of hemp (https:/ / www. haworthpress. com/ store/ ArticleAbstract. asp?sid=WHMFTL5P4HRL8KGL589LPHULAS5X554F& ID=8157). Journal of Industrial Hemp 7(1): 7-23. Retrieved on 23 February 2007 [68] Trjk, O., N. Bucherna, E. Kiss, H. Homoki, Z. Finta-Korpelov , I. Bcsa, I. Nagy, and L. E. Heszky. 2002. Novel male specific molecular markers (MADC5, MADC6) for sex identification in hemp. Euphytica 127: 209-218. [69] Tanurdzic, M. and J. A. Banks. 2004. Sex-determining mechanisms in land plants. Plant Cell 16 (suppl.): S61-71. [70] Mohan Ram, H. Y., and R. Sett. 1982. Induction of fertile male flowers in genetically female Cannabis sativa plants by silver nitrate and silver thiosulfate anionic complex. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 62: 369-375. [71] Journal of Industrial Hemp 2003 Vol 8 issue 1 page 5-9, Female-Associated DNA Polymorphisms of Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.), Hong Shao, Shu-Juan Song, Robert C. Clarke [72] 19291930 Physicians' Catalog of the Pharmaceutical and Biological Products of Parke, Davis & Company. Detroit: Parke, Davis & Co., p. 12. [73] 19291930 Physicians' Catalog of the Pharmaceutical and Biological Products of Parke, Davis & Company. Detroit: Parke, Davis & Co., p. 194. [74] S. Aldington et.all: Cannabis use and risk of lung cancer: a casecontrol study, European Respiratory Journal, ERJ February 1, 2008 vol. 31 no. 2 280-286 (http:/ / erj. ersjournals. com/ content/ 31/ 2/ 280. full) [75] Hulsew (1979), p. 183. [76] Mallory and Mair (2000), p. 262.
14
Cannabis
[77] [78] [79] [80] Mallory and Mair (2000), p. 306. Chapter 1: Cannabis in the Ancient World. India: The First Marijuana-Oriented Culture. ISBN 978-1-84340-310-4. ISBN 978-0-313-20721-1.
15
Further reading
Deitch, Robert (2003). Hemp: American history revisited: the plant with a divided history (http://books.google. ca/books?id=PKDrpeRRY94C&lpg=PA9&dq=History of Cannabis&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true). Algora Pub. ISBN0-87586-206-3 Earleywine, Mitchell (2005). Understanding marijuana: a new look at the scientific evidence (http://books. google.ca/books?id=r9wPbxMAG8cC&lpg=PA3&dq=History of Cannabis&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q& f=true). Oxford University Press. ISBN0-19-513893-7 Emmett, David; Graeme Nice (2009). What you need to know about cannabis: understanding the facts (http:// books.google.ca/books?id=dHAy6T_LSV4C&lpg=PA55&dq=History of Cannabis&pg=PP1#v=onepage& q&f=true). Jessica Kingsley Publishers. ISBN1-84310-697-3 Hulsew, A. F. P. (1979). China in Central Asia: The Early Stage 125 BC AD 23: an annotated translation of chapters 61 and 96 of the History of the Former Han Dynasty. E. J. Brill, Leiden. ISBN 90-04-05884-2. Geoffrey William, Guy; Brian Anthony Whittle, Philip Robson (2004). The medicinal uses of cannabis and cannabinoids (http://books.google.ca/books?id=AznCzOxvrtwC&lpg=PA1&dq=History of Cannabis& pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true). Pharmaceutical Press. ISBN0-85369-517-2 Holland, Julie M.D. (2010). The pot book : a complete guide to cannabis : its role in medicine, politics, science, and culture (http://books.google.ca/books?id=MQql_gt2QEgC&lpg=PA316&dq=Cannabis& pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true). Park Street Press. ISBN978-1-59477-368-6 Iversen, Leslie L (2008). The science of marijuana (http://books.google.ca/books?id=l8O2OMNLNtcC& lpg=PA17&dq=History of Cannabis&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true) (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-532824-0 Jenkins, Richard (2006). Cannabis and young people: reviewing the evidence (http://books.google.ca/ books?id=bFDznfmJLnAC&lpg=PP1&dq=Cannabis&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true). Jessica Kingsley. ISBN1-84310-398-2 Lambert, Didier M (2008). Cannabinoids in Nature and Medicine (http://books.google.ca/ books?id=ATDRt1HM9MwC&lpg=PA15&dq=History of Cannabis&pg=PR11#v=onepage&q&f=true). Wiley-VCH. ISBN3-906390-56-X Mallory, J. P. and Victor H. Mair (2000). The Tarim Mummies: Ancient China and the Mystery of the Earliest Peoples from the West. Thames & Hudson, London. ISBN 0-500-05101-1. Roffman, Roger A; Robert S. Stephens (2006). Cannabis dependence: its nature, consequences, and treatment (http://books.google.ca/books?id=DEWRoPweosEC&lpg=PA89&dq=History of Cannabis& pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true). Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-81447-2 Russo, Ethan; Melanie Creagan Dreher, Mary Lynn Mathre (2004). Women and cannabis: medicine, science, and sociology (http://books.google.ca/books?id=gZJ7m3Uf6FQC&lpg=PA29&dq=History of Cannabis& pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true). Haworth Press. ISBN0-7890-2101-3 Solowij, Nadia (1998). Cannabis and cognitive functioning (http://books.google.ca/ books?id=bL2u5RRYIpcC&lpg=PA84&dq=History of Cannabis&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true). Cambridge University Press. ISBN0-521-59114-7
Cannabis
16
External links
International Plant Names Index (IPNI) (http://www.ipni.org/ipni/advPlantNameSearch.do?find_family=& find_genus=Cannabis&find_species=&find_infrafamily=&find_infragenus=&find_infraspecies=& find_authorAbbrev=&find_includePublicationAuthors=off&find_includeBasionymAuthors=off& find_publicationTitle=&find_isAPNIRecord=on&find_isAPNIRecord=false&find_isGCIRecord=on& find_isGCIRecord=false&find_isIKRecord=on&find_isIKRecord=false&find_rankToReturn=all& output_format=normal&find_sortByFamily=on&find_sortByFamily=off&query_type=by_query& back_page=plantsearch) The Endocannabinoid System Network (ECSN) (http://www.endocannabinoid.net/) - Contains medical information to the Endocannabinoid System Erowid: Cannabis (Marijuana) Vault (http://www.erowid.org/plants/cannabis/) UNODC: World Drug Report 2006, Chapter 2: Cannabis: Why We Should Care (2006) (http://www.unodc. org/pdf/WDR_2006/wdr2006_chap2_why.pdf) EMCDDA drugs profile: Cannabis (2007) (http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/?nnodeid=25484)
17
18
License
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 //creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/