Social Structure in India
Social Structure in India
Social Structure in India
The ethnic and linguistic diversity of India is proverbial and rivals the diversity of
continental Europe which is not a single nation-State like India. India contains a
large number of different regional, social, and economic groups, each with
distinctive or dissimilar customs and cultural practices. Region-wise, differences
between social structures of India’s north and south are marked, especially with
respect to kinship systems and family relationships. Religious differences are
pervasive through out the country. There is the Hindu majority and the large
Muslim minority or “second majority”. There are other Indian groups—Buddhists,
Christians, Jains, Jews, Parsis, Sikhs, and practitioners of tribal religions—and
hundreds of sub-religions or religious communities within larger communities like
the Arya Samajis, Sanatanis among the Hindus; Shias and Sunnis among the
Muslims; Monas and Keshdharis among Sikhs and hundreds of other castes, sub-
castes, communities, vegetarians and non-vegetarians from each religion. Each
group is proud of its faith and very sure of its superiority over other faiths.
Urban-rural differences too are immense. Over 70 per cent of India’s population
lives in villages; agriculture still remains their mainstay. Mud houses, dusty lanes,
grazing cattle, chirping and crying of birds at sunset and rising smell of dung and
chulah-smoke are the usual settings for the social lives of most rural Indians. In
India’s enlarging cities, millions of people live among roaring vehicles, surging
crowds, overcrowded streets, busy commercial establishments, loudspeakers
blaring movie tunes or religious recitations, factories and trucks and buses
breathing poisonous pollution into unhealthy lungs.
Gender distinctions are highly pronounced. The behaviour norms of men and
women are very different, more so in villages. Prescribed ideal gender roles are
fast losing to new patterns of behaviour among both sexes. Individually, both men
and women behave in one way and collectively in quite another way. Public
behaviour of both men and women is rude and unhelpful, but the same people
when in individual situation and relationship can be very different. People
occupying public positions are extremely unhelpful and even normal actions done
toward others as part of normal routine are projected as personal favours. Even
senior citizens, retired persons, war widows do not get their pension approved for
years! A clerk in a government office wields greater actual power than a decision-
making executive and can withhold implementation of his superior’s orders for
ever. If the victim of delay approaches the court, the litigant is in for a shock after
shock as the case gets adjourned endlessly and after years of attending court
hearings gets an unimaginably skewed judgment written in a highly ambiguous
language. Litigants pay high fees to lawyers and bribes to court staff and even to
judges.
Indian village life is neither simple nor inviting. That is why no villager who has
come to the city goes back. According to sociologists: “Each village is connected
through a variety of crucial horizontal linkages with other villages and with urban
areas both near and far. Most villages are characterized by a multiplicity of
economic, caste, kinship, occupational, and even religious groups linked vertically
within each settlement. Factionalism is a typical feature of village politics. In one
of the first of the modern anthropologi-cal studies of Indian village life,
anthropologist Oscar Lewis called this complexity “rural cosmopolitanism.”
Typical Indian villages have clustered dwelling patterns built very close to one
another. Sociologists call them “nucleated settlements”, with small and narrow
lanes for passage of people and sometimes carts. Village fields surround these
settlements. On the hills of central, eastern, and far northern India, dwellings are
more spread out. In wet States of West Bengal and Kerala, houses are a little
dispersed; in Kerala, some villages merge into the next village and visitor are not
able to see divisions between such villages.
In northern and central India, neighbourhood boundaries can be vague. Houses of
Dalits are ordinarily situated on outskirts of nucleated settlements. Distinct Dalit
hamlets, however, are rare. Contrastingly, in the south, where socio-economic
divisions and caste pollution observances tend to be stronger than in the north,
Dalit hamlets are set at a little distance from other caste neighbourhoods
Bigger landowners do not cultivate lands but hire tenant farmers to do this work.
Artisans in pottery, wood, cloth, metal, and leather, although diminishing,
continue to eke out their existence in contemporary Indian villages like centuries
past. Religious observances and weddings are occasions for members of various
castes to provide customary ritual goods and services.
Most Indian cities are densely populated. New Delhi, for example, had 6,352
people per square kilometre in 1991. Congestion, noise, traffic jams, air pollution,
grossly inadequate housing, transportation, sewerage, electric power, water
supplies, schools, hospitals and major shortages of key necessities characterize
urban life. Slums and pavement dwellers constantly multiply so also trucks,
buses, cars, auto-rickshaws, motorcycles, and scooters, spewing uncontrolled
fumes, all surging in haphazard patterns along with jaywalking pedestrians and
cattle.
Once a sleepy land of docile people, India has become one of the 20 most
dangerous countries of the world to live in.