Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Waiting For Godot

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 67
At a glance
Powered by AI
The document discusses existentialism in Samuel Beckett's play Waiting for Godot. It analyzes the play through the lens of existentialist philosophy.

The thesis of the paper is that Waiting for Godot can be interpreted as expressing existentialist thoughts and depicting the existential dilemma through its characters.

Existentialism is discussed as a philosophical movement in the paper, with focus on thinkers like Soren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche and Martin Heidegger.

1

EXISTENTIALISM IN MARLOWS
WAITING FOR GODOT
By
Nusrat
Roll No. 6117
MA English
Session 2012-14
Supervised By
Ms. Nighat Faheem

National University of Modern Language Islamabad


DEC 2013

ABSTRACT
Samuel Becketts is well known writer of modern times having strong
popularity over writing absurd plays as Waiting for Godot is known for the
absurd play in the theater of absurdity in modern times. He has written this play in
absurd text as Existentialist form of literature or the theme of the Christian
allegory. The current study is a keen search of the context of the play in attempt to
highlight these thoughts presented by the writer in the absurd recognition. This is a
strong commentary over the modern times phenomenon of Christian Existentialism
and the theater of absurd. , the researcher has glimpsed the context of the play in
the perspective of the new hidden realities in the context of the play by putting the
analytical view over the text of the play. The focus is given over the absurd
thoughts and the existential dilemma. Siren Kierkegaard is known as the pioneer of
the Existentialism, he has given a detailed view at existentialist writers in
interpretation of their texts and the thoughts by observing the works of Jean-Paul
Sartre and Albert Camus. Kierkegaards writings are famous in the absurd vie
than the modern term of the atheistic approach to the art. The researcher has
deconstruct the text and the thoughts of the writer under the umbrella of the
philosophical theories use in the famous absurd play Waiting for Godot, the play
may interpret in manifold vies of writing but the current study ponder about the

existentialism given in the context of the play. The study focuses on the key
characters of the play Vladimir and Estragon and the most psychological character
Lucky and his absurd speech. And also the paradoxical statue of the Godot in the
title charter in the play.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT......IV
DEDICATION...vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS....vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS....viii
CHAPTER -1
1. INTRODUCTION.
A biography of the Life of Samuel Beckett.

Absurdity in Godoth

CHAPTER-2
Introduction
CRITICS VIEWS OF EXISTENTIALISM
BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
EXISTENTIALISM AS A PHILOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
MAJOR EXISTENTIALISTS
Siren Kierkegaard

Friedrich Nietzsche
Martin Heidegger
CHAPTER-3
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
DATA COLLECTION
OBJECTIVES OF RESEARCH
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
DE-LIMITATION OF STUDY

Ch. 4 -

Theatre of the Absurd AND WAITING FOR GODOT


The absurdity and Beckett
The Theory of Absurdity

The term absurdism


Ch. 5 - Waiting for Godot, reflecting cold war anxiety
The absurdity of Beckett AND NOTHINGNESS

Ch. 6 CH.7 -

THE PLOT OF THE PLAY AND EXISTENTIALISM

Beckett's Absurd Characters 'Waiting for Godot'

Ch. 7 - Conclusion
SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
REFERENCE/BIBLIOGRAPHY

A biography of the Life of Samuel Beckett


He belongs to the famous city of Dublin that is known for the nice writers of
the modern times. The key figures of the age are the Sheridan, Oscar Wilde,
J. B. Shaw, S. O'Casey, and J.M. Synge. The major figure of the said city is
Mr., Samuel Beckett; he is the master writer of plays of the modern century
and the post modern century too. He is known to be barb in the destined way
in the good Friday and he has similarity too the date and the day of the birth
to the fructification. The early 19th century brought fame in his writings in the
form of the absurd. It has also the similarity to his age and birth and he also
reflected in the symbolic form and sense. The strong belief of the Christ
crucification and his two fellows is represented by him and one of them who
were accompanying him was saved and other was not saved and was cursed
and damned. All this sentiments was highlighted in the text of the drama
Beckett in his famous drama waiting for Godot.
Vladimir:
Ah, yes the two thieves. Do you remember the story?
Estragon:
No.
Vladimir:
Shall I tell it to you?
Estragon:
No.
Vladimir:
It'll pass the time. (Pause) Two thieves, crucified at the same
time as our Saviour. OneEstragon:
Our what?
Vladimir:
Our Savior. Two thieves. One is supposed to have been
saved and the other... (he searches for the contrary of
saved)...damned.
(Godot 14)

His father was ROE Beckett. And his number was second in his family kids.
He studied in the local school along with his brother. In Dublin, and further
he was admitted in the Trinity college for higher education. Then his age was
17 years. He was a good player of rugby and secured many prizes and titles in
his education career. He was also well in other games as cricket and base ball.
He completed his graduation from trinity college and was appointed in the
lector of Paris. The main building factor in his rating style was his stay in
France the impact of its civilization much influenced over his writing. He also
visited to Germany in his aunt home for family trip and stayed there for few
days. He facieses his essays with the life different styles and attitudes after
that visit. He also secured his life romantic role in that visit by involving in
his cousin Peggy. Due the traditional norms of his family he could not marry
with her due to the immediate cousins. The sad column of her life was the
suffering of her in the disease of the tuberculosis in the short span of time she
died just after the two years of his visit in the agony of love. We see the
reflection of her love in the romantic and well mannered writing of Mr.
Beckett.
.

James Joyce was the man visiting Germany after 26 years of his visit.
Samuel, on recommendation of his Irish school mate, the poet Thomas McGreevy,
soon met Joyce. He was immediately impressed by Joyce's literary work, that he wrote

8
an essay on him Dante...Bruno. Vice...Joyce it was actually written in praise of the
father of the absurdity. It was a bad luck of the Joyce that due the poor eye sight he
was unable to writ e the works in doing so Beckett helped him in his famous works
writings.

It was the reason that Beckett was famous as the personal secretary to Joyce. He also
wrote essays on "artistic father" in praise to the Joyce. And also the essays on the topic
of Proust Proust. These were in form and the sense Joyce an. It was a keen affiliation
to Joyce in art and approach. But he clearly stated the fact that he has different
thoughts and approach to Joyce in his writings and imaginations. His point of view
and style is not superfluous to Mr. Joyce. He writes;

The kind of work I do is one in which I am not the master of my own material. The
more Joyce knew the more he could. He's tending toward omniscience and
omnipotence as an artist. I'm working with impotence, ignorance. ...My little
exploration is the whole zone of being that has always been set aside by artists as
something unusable - as something by definition incompatible with art
The reign in the context of philosophy was the stay in Paris. He studied in

Depth of the Arthur Schopenhauer, Ren Descartes it takes his attention to the
occionalism in the literature of the modern times. Beckett returned to Dublin in 1930,
at the age of 24, and was appointed a lector in French at Trinity College. In January

10
after having spent their four terms, Beckett resigned this academic post.
It was not a good stay because he was indulged in the trouble of anxiety. He was much
happy in Paris but at his returned he was not happy a remained in the dark room in
order to show his strong affiliation to Paris. It was the turning point of Beckett to the
Paris on the suggestion of the doctors to stay in Paris for the relax from anxiety in the
form of freedom, in order to meet the livelihoods of the Paris he started to write the
ballads and the poems and other works to earn the livelihood. He wrote the novel
Dream of Fair to Middling Women, unfortunately it was not published in his life
due to some reasons. He also wrote the supplement in the form of stories as More
Pricks Than Kicks.
In the reign of Hitler he was in Dublin. It caused mental trouble for him in his reign.
The sudden death of his father and his beloved Peggy made his in much trouble as he
as much in mental breakdown. It all disturbed him a lot.
He led in the troubles in that tough period and consequently he used to write different
works in a NEW style in the new age. His famous worlds at that age Echo's Bones and
Other Precipitates (1935).after that he used to writer on the title Murphy (1938).
It is the autobiographical novel reflecting his own personality and his life. He used the
tile and the characters of the novel in real stressed way to the rural life characters. It is
about the living area as stadium road where he lived. All other places are shown in the
stressed way to the Lots Road and the

The character of Murphy is very like Beckett himself, it is one of the novels where the
places and the names of the streets are named exactly. There appears Stadium road

11
where Beckett lived at that time, Lots Road, Cremona Road, and where Beckett as
well as Murphy wandered about London, both usually in a very depressed state.
Soon after the beginning of the war Beckett returned to Paris to be with his friends.
During the war the Gestapo discovered Beckett's activities in connection with the
French Resistance movement. As a result, he was forced to find a sanctuary in
Roussillon in the apartment of his companion Suzanne Deschevaux-Dumesnil's friend.
Here, in the south of France he spent a long period of time during the war years. While
hiding from the Nazis, he wrote another novel Watt (1942-1944), in his stay there Mr.
Krupp argued about his party was After the war he returned back to Ireland again to
be with his mother. Mary Roe Beckett was, at that time, dying from Parkinson's
disease and throughout her final illness, Beckett cared of as the following way.
Krupps Tape: - Bench by the weir from where I could see her window. There I
sat, in the biting wind, wishing she were gone. (Pause.) ...I was
there when (...) the blind went down, one of those dirty brown
roller affairs, throwing a ball for a little white dog as chance
would have it. I happened to look up and there it was. All over and
done with, at least. I sat on for a few moments with the ball in my
hand and the dog yelping and pawing at me. (Pause.) Moments.
Her moments, my moments. (Pause.) The dog's moments. (Krupp
219-221)
(Krupp 221)
The next proceeding years he produced three more novels as - the trilogy
Molloy (1951), Malone meurt (1949-1951), and L'innommable (1953), they
were also available later on in English and other languages. Which he later
translated into English as Molloy, Mallone Dies, and Unnameable. Beckett's

12
novels were of no success among French publishers. Due to Beckett's total
resignation; it was Suzanne who took the manuscripts from one publisher to
the other, and although she was rejected many times, finally made a contract
with Lyndon, who published Beckett's works. Poetry to novel and then to
drama inter in the absurd style of writing. It opened the new terminology. It
was a turning the style of Beckett in mild of the 20th century. He argued in the
followings;:
"I turned to writing plays to relieve myself of the awful depression the prose
led me into. Life at that time was too demanding, too terrible, and I thought
the theatre would be a diversion."
He influenced over the people in the form of the new theater ion n the new
sees of drama. He also writes a unique drama in attendant Godot in French, it
made him popular in the context of the ne writer and much influential in the
writings. He was initially himself re translated his work in English in 1972.
Waiting for Godot was written in proceeding to the All That Fall. All That
Fall was followed by Krupps Last Tape (1958), Endgame (1958), Embers
(1959), Happy Days (1961), and Words and Music (1962). He also got the
Nobel prize in his writings by the white men. He used to cross the mobility in
the last session of his life. He fell ill and was too senile to walk in that way.
He died in the year of 1989 at the age of eighty three. His own words for his
style and the attitude of the writing is as ;
"All this business of a labor to accomplish before I can end the words to

13

say; "a truth to recover in order to say it before I can handle an imposed task,
once known, long neglected, finally forgotten; to perform, before I can be
done, done with speaking, done with listening, I invented it all in a hope that
it will console me, help me to go on, allow me to think of myself as someone
on the road moving between a beginning and an end, gaining ground, losing
ground, getting lost, but somehow in the long run making headway, all lies,
I've nothing to do, say nothing in particular, I have to speak whatever that
means.

Absurdity in godoth
Samuel Beckett says in his famous quotation;
I have a clear memory of my own fetal existence. It was an existence where no voice, no
possible movement could free me from the agony and darkness I was subjected to.
(Samuel Beckett)
He is strongly speaking about the internal feelings and thoughts in the form of the all themes and
the characters in his drama waiting for Go dot. He is representing the times of his age in the play.
The theatre of absurd is the true representation of age.
Since the world war two occurred the all people of the affected areas and surrounds were became
the atheist and lost their belief in the religion and the inventions of science. The all in venations
re hated by the people of the modern times. It was due to the disaster occurred killing the large

14
amount of people and the economic fall was there a key cause in the construction of such absurd
thoughts at that time. All the pays written in that age were actually much affected by the thought
of the theory of existentialism. They were anti to the existence of men on the earth. And
considered the existence as a useless issue. All the themes and the characters were in the
prospect of the absurdity.
It caused the absurdity and the whole plot and the subject matter was on the base of the
existential views. The all theories of the plot characters and the unities of the time and the place
were ignored at that time. So all the story and the themes were aimless and nonsense. There is
nothingness not like the plays of the other ages. We see in the waiting for Godot that key
characters of the play were at the end at the nothingness and yet waiting because of the no plot
and the theme of the drama as an existentialist play. All of the problems were as we seed in the
begging of the play.
Beckett represents the whole characters in the play as mobile and selfless in the origin. The key
factor of the absurd plays is the no idea or the conclusion in the drama as Beckett introduced in
the drama. All the characters as Vladimir, estragon, are the at tension and the futility. Even in the
drama the imagery was of the feet in illogical and absurd.Characters normally come in pairs, so
does Vladimir and Estragon. Even though they think they will be better off alone they never
seem to be able to exist without each other. They need each other to prove their own existence.
There is also the slave master relationship which is obvious in the relationship between Pozzo
and Lucky. This can be argued as the relationship between the world and man. Man became the
slave of an uncaring and cruel world. Where gods and heroes were evident in the preceding time
periods, the hero has now become the anti-hero. Character flaws are exaggerated and characters

15
appear to be dull and boring. Estragon is forever battling to get his boots on and very little in
their conversations make sense.
The use of the dialogues by the writer are also absurd and the illogical. Lucky is introduced as a
humoristic characters having nonsense speech to the other characters. The text has no punition
signs to represent the feelings of the key characters. The term of mental trouble as aphasia is
fully established in the dialogues of the all characters in the drama. The finding of the dialogues
shows of the useless words having no impression over the all of the story of the play and the end
remain open ended phrase. The whole trouble and the foolishness are indicated in the play and
yet till end same emptiness is there in the characters. The writer represents the men as the useless
and foolish to resolve the issues of the life in positive way. The all characters are futile and in
wait to rescue them from the troubles and the misfortune. The end is as the beginning of the play,
this is the trait of the existentialists that they remain in the motivation of the audios in the form of
the psychological reflection of the thoughts at their end. They conclude the all the mean and
sense depends upon the attitude and the way we make not the world.

CHAPTER 2
LITERATURE REVIEW
INTRODUCTION
This current study is based upon the Samuel Becketts art of writings and
characterization, the setting and the use of language in elite g for Godot. This play

16

is full and rich with the prospect of the existentialist concepts such as despair,
anxiety and thrown nests on the way to authenticity. Existentialism is a
philosophical movement that deals with the man and his existence, it is all due to
the few reasons,

First of all, all the rational sciences cannot prove the absolute,

and thus, there was no absolute truth. And also the man lost his all belief in the
religion and in the God as well. This all was due to the modern arts and the
development of science and the life too. The modern societies depended on the
idea that signifiers always point to signified, and that reality resides in signified. In
postmodernism, however, there are only signifiers. The idea of any stable or
permanent reality disappears, and with it, the idea of signified that signifiers point
to. Therefore, for the existentialist view, there are only surfaces, without depth;
only signifiers, with no
Signified. This means that language has no function of conveying meaning to
provide communication, and man has no trustable reality, which will provide a
basis for the existentialist in his search for being. Existentialism places the
individual in the centre and questions his existence in the absence of the first
signified. The reason why Samuel Becketts works are usually discussed in an
Existentialist context is that he is one of the ineffable leading playwrights of the
Twentieth century drama, and the actor of the radical digression from the
Conventional notions of writing, representing and directing a play. Having adopted

17

Sartres existentialism as the philosophical basis for his approach while creating
his masterpieces, Beckett has become the founder of the Absurd Drama in British
Literature. When his plays were first performed, people who were accustomed to
the traditional theatre were hostile to his drama. However, particularly after World
War II, their losses and fears have made them feel close to Becketts characters.
In his plays the playwright the concept of the existentialism is introduced by the
writer as a whole and it is in the form of different characters as Beckett showed in
all of his plays of rhea theatre of absurd. He points out the fact that all
independence of the modern man as futile and ire was the way to thaw disbelief in
all fields of the life as he showed in the form of the Vladimir and pogo characters
in the play waiting for go dot.
CRITICS VIEWS OF EXISTENTIALISM
Beckett constructs all of his characters that are tramps and other one.
These may stem says;
The raw ideas from Descartes to Sartre that Beckett undoubtedly gathered
and
Cooked as Andrew K. Kennedy states in the introduction of his book (3).
Despite the fact that he expresses in his writings a lot of unconventional
Ideas, beliefs and feelings in a new manner, this study does not aim to
subordinate

18

Beckettian drama to any particular system of thought; finding thejunctures


where his writing and the existentialist ideas connect is the real purpose
while displaying how his characters are experiencing authenticity in an
existentialist query of being. n this chapter, first the terms of existentialist
views to be used throughout the study will be defined in respect to the
related philosophers.
Subsequently, in Existentialism is represented as the Philosophical Movement
.Existentialism is a tool to describe the outlook of the modern society that has
suffered a lot in the result of the modern wars 1 and 2.
This philosophical attitude deals with the ideas of the different critics as
Sartre and Heidegger, they are the famous Existentialist

1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS


Sartres argues the term in different points as the absurd theatre presents the cream
of the different attitudes and the feelings of man and the society in the following
words as;
Man is nothing else but what he makes of himself is built upon this
understanding. Such is the first principle of Existentialism, says Sartre in
Existentialism and Humanism (28). What do we mean by saying that existence
precedes essence? We mean that man first of all exists, encounters himself, surges

19

up in the world and defines himself afterwards (Sartre, 1948:28). This quote
claims that existence is a necessity to have essence. Sartre also states He will
note anything until later, and then he will be what he makes of himself (1948:28).
As Buhrmann points out, for existentialists, the world is utterly without absolute
meaning, and man is left to invent his own personal meaning for his existence
(14). In contrast to the Aristotelian assumption that essence precedes existence
and in the world man exists to achieve a purpose, the Sartre existentialism argues
that man has no predetermined purpose or meaning. Rather, humans define
themselves because their individual lives come into being as a response to the
challenges proposed by their existence in the world. As Sartre states, life has no
meaning a priori. Before you come alive, life is nothing (1957: 49).
So in view of different in perpetrations the whole life is reflected in the thereof
absurd and it deals almost all the factors of life and its origin and the thoughts and
the essence of the attitudes of the people towards life and its existence.

Existentialism is based on the nothingness and it is the necessary aspect of the


human consciousness and it is the is a sort of no-thing-nests surrounded by the
denseness of being.

It developed by the man consicious behavior and the

determinism, it is also deals with the existing of man under tough condition. That

20

is why, Man is condemned to be free and without any support or help


whatever, is condemned at every instant to invent man (1948:34).
Ellis states AS
Anguish as the manifestation of freedom... (15). That is because the recognition
of nothingness, according to existentialists, is considered as something liberating
since man realizes that he is free to choose what he will make of himself due to the
fact that he has no ready-made essence. As it is known, Existentialism is the
doctrine confronts man with a possibility of choice (25) as Sartre states in
Existentialism and Humanism. That is to say, This freedom, which brings
anguish, springs from our recognition of Nothingness (Hinchliffe 25), and this
naturally brings anguish owing to the great responsibility it requires. Anguish leads
a person to confront his own nothingness (Dreyfus 205).
Sartre argues the state of the existentialism as the
Consciousness in one stroke opens up a world of possibilities, yet at the very
Moment poses their annihilation: this says Sartre, is our anguished lot
(McCulloch 46).
Subjectivity over objectivity is another basic theme of existentialism always
adjoined in the Beckettian drama. The basic point is that one makes himself what
he is through his free choices, rather than by being what he is. Sartre explains what
Subjectivity means according to existentialists and states, Man is nothing else but

21

What he makes of himself. Such is the first principle of existentialism. It is also


what is called subjectivity (1957: 15). There is nothing objective about what a
human being is. So, everything starts from the inside, from the side of the man or
subject. As Sartre points out in Existentialism is Humanism, subjectivity must be
the starting point. In any case ... existentialism, in our sense of the world, is a
doctrine that does render human life possible; a doctrine, also, which affirms that
every truth and every action imply both an environment and a human subjectivity
(Sartre, 1948:24).
What is the kind at the very heart the auto and centre term of existentialism, is the
absolute in the character of the free commitment as a whole , by whichever man
realizes the nature of

himself in realizing a type of absurd

humanity

commitment that is developed in always understandable, to no matter to describe


whom in no matter is the what epoch and its in the form bearing upon the
relativity of the sound and patent cultural pattern which may cause and result
from such the complete absolute commitment. One must think and deal to and
observe equally the relativity of the modern Cartesians and the absolute and unique
character of the Cartesian commitment. In other words, by eating, by sleeping and
also all kind of the or by behaving in any fashion whatsoever is oat. There is not a
difference between the free being and also being as self-committal, as existence
choosing its essence and absolute being (1948:47).

22

EXISTENTIALISM AS A PHILOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT


Existentialism is a philosophical movement it is anti to the idea of the existence of
man is not easy way and possible on the earth and the world wars has ruined the
whole issues and keep the people at the thought that they must think in the sense of
the clues of the that about how humanity must should live in a and focuses upon
individual existence, freedom and choice as the result of the movement to allow
the people to do as they want. It was not classical in nature and appearances and as
in reaction to the middle age.

23

The philosophers of that age like Spinoza, Leibniz, Hobbes, Hume,


Locke, Voltaire, Bacon and Rousseau, regarded reason not only as mans
highest Faculty which is capable of solving all problems and providing him
with complete Knowledge in the end, but it was also seen as completely
positive, with which the Quality of being flawless is meant. In other words,
reason was considered to be Absolute, which explains why those
philosophers, who were proud of being Reasonable and rational, overstated
their case.
. The first and the foremost theme was the one is that reason as the ultimate part
of life reality, it is underused and is not determined by anything else; and the
other sense as the powers of reason are unlimited
(Roubiczek I).
The attributes as the sense of reason and the human experience explores and shows
that the reason is not just a separate part of human nature but attitudes in it and it is
completely limited. Therefore, term meets to the irrational to find and
Consider that all of reason is fully absolute. This was true claim making agree for
an absolute sense and the reason, in turn, generated three reactions in thoughts and
it ultimately produced the term Existentialism.

24

What it gave the way to the attitudes that are irrational in the Age of Reason not
these as was that neither in the subject of physics nor in the subject of biology and
not even in modern psychology.
MAJOR EXISTENTIALISTS
The major Existentialists in the modern times after the world wars were
Siren Kierkegaard, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre and
Albert Camus
. They are classified as the following;
The Pure philosophers are that looked in to the real state of the absurdity of the
modern man like Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Heidegger.
The second group is of the literary figures of existentialist philosophy and they
followed the literary thoughts in representation of the existentialism like Sartre and
Camus. Of the five influential figures Sartre is the clearest and most systematic.
Consequently, detailed illustrations of existentialist themes are more often drawn
from the works of Sartre (Olson VIII). Consequently, this thesis will base its
arguments on Sartre, by whom Beckett was most influenced while referring to
other philosophers too.
Siren Kierkegaard
He is famous at beginning of the nineteenth century, Kierkegaard got popularity
he defend his real faith and his real belief in unique ethical self, and he was in

25

the reality of moral values and the law grasping attitude in the claiming of the
reality and the truth.
Kierkegaard, the personal experience turns out to be real. For example, what an
Individual knows is not regarded as of the external world, but it is accepted as the
Inner knowledge of his or her own experience. He attacks certain conceptions of
Christianity, which were taken for granted. To illustrate, he argues that the socalled

Friedrich Nietzsche
The one of the eminent characteristics of Nietzsche is his opposition to the
existing philosophical attitudes and the systems, and an is not easily noticeable
dissatisfaction to as a whole with the traditional philosophy and he was in the
thought of the as he considered it to be superficial and the all of the remote from
life, which Kierkegaard and links to him in clearly with existentialist philosophers
like Heidegger and Sartre. He is known to replace the God of Christianity, with the
will to power which, according to him, is the soul of the world and is scattered
among individual men. Each man is a centre of the will to power, and his
existence can be represented as the will to govern the whole universe. The human
will know no obstacle; there are no limits for him. However, while existence
emerges as a philosophical problem in the struggle to think of the paradoxical

26

presence of God for Kierkegaard, for Nietzsche it emerges from and in the
reflections of his frequent statement God is dead; we have killed God; God has
died. This is apparently not an atheistic utterance. Rather, it refers to the loss of
faith.

Martin Heidegger
S Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, is famous aspect and individual do
Existentialist movement
Martin Heidegger views as;
Who particularly tries to justify the absoluteness of Existentialism, the
exclusion of essence and objectivity, the attempt to make the subjective
method all-inclusive by trying to break down the barriers between the
objective and the subjective in different ways from Nietzsche? Furthermore,
after seeing waiting for Goodson the stage many critics have thought that he
is the philosopher whom Samuel Beckett might have read. His lifelong
project was to answer the question of being. In Being and Time, in order to
understand Being, Heidegger argued that man must first understand the
human kind of being: Dassin that is Being-there, the kind of being who
questions his Being. Despite these, Heidegger himself denies that he is an
Existentialist because he is mainly interested in the nature of being, that is

27

fundamental ontology. Heidegger is mainly interested in describing


existence and he, then, attempts to make people question even the simplest
things and deeds that have been already taken for granted, as Beckett does
in his plays. He points out that men are what men can become. Therefore, to
him, becoming is a process towards the future, which \subordinates the past
and the present. He also coined many new words, which he himself
considers ashes main merit (Roubiczek 130).

Chapter-3
LITERATURE REVIEW
1. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter is all about the methodology used in the research and the all data analysis and the
research statement and also the significance of the current research as a whole. The current
study is about the existentialism in Becketts waiting for Godot by deconstruction of the text

28
and analytical view of the modern term of existentialism and the absurdity of the theatre after
World War 1 and 2. Also grass route knowledge about goals of research, text and discourse in
feminist prospect.

3.6 OBJECTIVE OF RESEARCH


The objectives of research are to peep in to the text of the play waiting for go dot in the
analytical perspective to highlight the intended themes and the plot of the play. It is the further
query in investigation there term existentialism and the theatre of absurd under the textual
support of the Becketts famous play Waiting for Godot

3.7 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

The research follows a descriptive approach, and all the analysis is based upon the
existentialism and the absurdity by putting different critics views and the theories . all the
findings are based on the detailed view of the text and the characters and the language used byu
Beckett in the famous play aiting for Godot. The play has been written in the context of the

29
existentialism after the world wars and the effects of these wars over the humanity are discussed
in the deep sense to find the reasons of the restlessness of modern man.

3.8 RESEARCH QUESTION

1. Existentialism represented by Beckett in his famous play Waiting for Godot


2. What is the impact of absurd theatre over the psychology of modern man in view of
Samuel Beckett?
3. How Beckett develops the effects of the World War 1 and 2 in the dialogues of his
famous play Eating for?
4. The portrayal of nothing to be done in different characters reflecting the conflicts
between mind and the body in Waiting for Godot but Samuel Beckett?

3.9 DATA COLLECTION

The primary source of data collection includes the text books of Beckett famous play
Witting for Godot, and the secondary data has been collected by articles, monographs,
doctoral thesis, autobiographies containing information and acceptable references from tertiary

30
books. However internet as an informational tool, helpful data by search engines, web portal is
used at maximum level to made the research more effective and incredible.

3.10 DATA ANALYSIS

The study is analyzed by putting the deconstruction of the text of the play and the
analytical approach to the existentialism developed by Beckett in his famous play Waiting for
Go dot The credibility and quality is confirmed by putting the method of deconstruction as
model for finding out the theatre of absurd and the influences of the word wars in creation of the
nothingness in the modern men.

CHAPTER 4

Theatre of the Absurd AND WAITING FOR GODOT


The term is grammatically a noun in origin and it obis further explained in
the following sense;

31

Drama using the abandonment of conventional dramatic form to portray the futility of
human struggle in a senseless world. Major exponents include Samuel Beckett, Eugene
Ionesco, and Harold Pinter.

Theater of the Absurd and the term absurdist, is presented by the famous critic Martin Echlin.
He describe explained by mean of the term in the different writings in his times. Echlin argues
the term an illustrative of a philosophy by Albert Camus, the all of the plays attached with the
movement are the basic one in the theme of existentialism. He argues the different plots and
their character as absurd in nature. In his 1961 essay, Echlin classified four playwrights as
leaders of the movement: Samuel Beckett, Eugene Ionesco, Arthur Adamou and Jean Genet.
Later, Echlin also included British playwright Harold Pinter to this group, and classified some of
the works of Tom Stoppard, Edward Albee and Jean Tardieu as also belonging to Absurdist
Theater as well.
The absurd character s is totally change in position and the origin in the context of the ideas then
past. Here no pet plot or the setting of the play is considered in all sense and the diction and
dialogues are developed in this sense as the whole representation of the modern times.

The absurdity and Beckett;


Becketts dramas are originated in a unique art and the glimpse of the modern times and
the appearances of different characters in novel and new way. He is in state of the view of the
man and his dealing to the surroundings the man is the theme of the all of his plays. The current

32
study is also base on the absurdity and the humanism in the light of the existentialism of the
modern times. He has a sound dramatic work in the theme of the existentialism in the drama
Waiting for Godot.

His all characters are based on the sisyphusean nature. It is all about the troubles and the
sufferings of man and the age. He wants to create the hope in his characters indirectly to the
modern time men. He describes the whole world as alienated and the full of suffering. His
characters are in the form of remote characters.

He also looks into the human isolation in the absurd age. The main sense in the confliction
between the characters sands the ideas in the drama. The hand from which he is isolated by the
walls of his self. The absurdity is the key factors in the form of the existentialism in the whole
characters. He discusses the mans troubles and the conflicts in the theatre of absurd. The men
are waiting for death and have nothing to do in building of his fate and luck by constant struggle.

The drama is real representation of the absurdity and existentialism. The main agenda is the
waiting for nothing and that has no end. Beckett's characters' are real representation of the
absurdity

and

has

no

end.

It

is

also

tragic

in

nature.

Beckett's absurd man is actually interacting constantly with the fate and the agony of the troubles
of life. Suffering may get end with efforts and hope.

The Theory of Absurdity

33

The absurdity is the sense of nothingness and reason less life. It is a foolish thing and do not have
the logical and seriousness in origin. It is ales a state of conflicts and the "Absurd origin of the
existentialism is "this encyclopedia article is absurd." It is Latin in origin and stands for
absurdum meaning "tune, it is also not rational in the mean and view. It may refer towards the
deafness and the foolishness and the idiotic behavior. It can be consider as the jock and the
noses behavior of men in daily life. It is notorious in the fame and the popularity. The all kind of
the irrational behaves and attitude is under the said term. As Beckett introduced in his famous
play. He focuses upon nonsense ridiculousness that is linked with the keen laughter, and ridicule
and foolishness in its form and usage.

The term Absurdism


If we look in the logical and philosophical sense we see the term means as the contradiction and
the conflict between the human sufferings and the lack of capabilities .the term does not as in
textual mean and it refers to the human "logically impossible, it is indeed the conflictive
impossibilities of men and his attitude. The man may not independently in the form of the
separate sense but it May cause self absurd behavior Absurdism, therefore, is a philosophical
school of thought arguing the all sufferings and the efforts of men in negative and senile
appearance to lose all the issues and the status of life in the existence of man.
Absurdity is a unique term used by Beckett in all of his plays and especially in waiting for
Godot. It fully argues the theatre of absurd. If we look into the history of absurdity we see the
three fold troubles in this connection. What Absurdity is, in what fate life moments it appears,
and what consequences for a human view of life it holds with itself. We find that what is the
purpose of man existence in this universe and his character in the world of modern age. The fact

34
is that always religion is at the superior and the top state and e always finds the solutions and aid
by

religion

to

face

the

troubles

of

our

life.

The theme of the origin and the object of the creation of the world are sought by the religion.
Religion provides sound views of the life and the theme of creation of men. We all believe in the
existence of God and he is the beneficial and kind to men in his sufferings and agony. In 1883
Friedrich Nietzsche introduced the concept that "God is dead" . It was appeared in that early
modern age due to the attachment of men to the temptations and the worldly desires. . From that
time of Zarathustra the old everyday certainties of life started to lose their certainty. The term is
also based upon the two world arts that caused great disaster in the killing of the human beings as
a whole. It brought men and world to the sense of the destruction and the missing of life and
loose of hope in the existence of men over the land of world. It generated the sense of absurdity
in sense arid theatre.
Martin Echlin argues the term in following view;
: "Absurd is that which is devoid of purpose. ...Cut off from his religious, metaphysical, and
transcendental roots, man is lost; all his actions become senseless, absurd, and useless".
Albert Camus a great writer of France states in the sense that the whole absurdity of men is by
dint of the modern men wars and much killing of life and the rest, deals with the absurd fate
forces in the world. Camus also expresses his views in the following reasons of the origin of
absurdity. Goes into the problem what the absurdity is and how it arises.
Human feelings are too much full of denseness" and these are also the kind of the strangeness
of the world". The outcome of these feelings is based on the restlessness and the feelings of
absurdity in the lacking ability of hope and the less value and status to the religion in the worldly

35
life. Absurdity is not a temporary but actually a permanent conflict, it is against the concept of
struggle. It is conflictive in nature to human psychology.
Camus argues about the absurdity as;
To commit suicide means to agree with absurdity, it means to give in, because the sense of life is
looked for in another world.
We find the same tendency in the all characters created in the play by Beckett, no character in
the play is sure to do suicide or the effort to the fittest of life. The men are not free from the
absurdity. It is less in sense and the logic to lead life. It is reasonless, aimless mad no hope is
there in it. It does not have thought of the tomorrow or the near future but of the day that passing.

Waiting for Go dot the key character the go dot remain silent and abstract till end and the other are in wait
for that character that did not arrived and remain a question mark till end. So this title of the drama
represents different interpretation as an existentialist play.

The play is originally written text in early 20th century. Critics says that Beckett translate the text in his
own work in the said text as, En attendant Go dot, and is subtitled (in English only), "a tragicomedy in
two acts".

36

Chapter 5
Waiting For Go dot, reflecting cold war anxiety
.

VLADIMIR: We'll be saved

Beckett wrote the drama at the theme of uncertainty created by the cold war it was a psychological state of
the troubles occurred by the world wars and the such ambiguity is reflected in the story and the characters

37
of the play in the absurd manner. Anxiety remains throughout the play. Paradigms are in the form of
religious and the scientific trouble as a whole. The reformation to the new characters and the plot is a
result on the cold wars and same is developed by Beckett in the play. As a result theories and the
foundations are totally reconstructed in the text of the play to introduce the all conflicts happened in the
cold war creating the mental trouble in the form of aphasia. This all is by dint of the destruction by the
war. Waiting for Go dot questions and confronts its contextual paradigms, incorporating both
existentialism and nihilism. Disliking and liking in the form of the dialogues and the plot of three
dramas. There is clear existentialist view created by Beckett in the drama. He represents the contradiction
of mind and thought by confronting the characters and the dialogues of the play and the audio thoughts.
Even the existence of the God and his arrival is conflicting to the religious norms and theories. The
history of performance of the play argues that at first people did not liked the play and remained walked
out by abusing the idea of absurdity at that time once the play was in performance session. Philosophical
questions about existence are raised, discussed, and then juxtaposed with a sight gag, vaudeville humor, or
the mundane, such as the fussing over the boots and bowler hats. The humor in the play is also under term
of nihilistic. .
Beckett personally argued as ;
"If I could have expressed the subject of my work in philosophical terms, I wouldn't have had any reason
to write it."
We see in the middle of 20th century the drama is as al in nature. He play is philosophic in origin. The
existentialistic approach was at high peak in the middle of the 20th century. The conflict of the existence
and the disbelief in religion was the substance of the modern age as inculcated by Beckett. Past atrocities
in the form of holocaust, atomic attacks in Hero shim Japan bring the change in people's thinking, religion
considered as the questioned and existentialism got popularity in the context of the already happened

38
incidents. The people were thinking about the kind of god to save them from the disaster of the war. This
trouble and the destruction led the people to the disappointment and de morale in all the issues of life.
Uncertainty the culture AND all kind of physical and the mental deprivation was there in the all fields of
life. Beckett gains all of the said issues in his through both the post apocalyptic plays setting of internal
and external facts and the play and the issues explored by means of the construction of characters in the
play.
The drama is developed in circular and non linear, talent as the traditional theatre or as the repetitive sense
in text and dialogues and the use of language...it is nat the true of life of 20th century. The whole agenda of
the play captured by Beckett is absurd and based on the existentialism.
The ambiguous dialogue and meaningless plot metaphorically portrays the repeated mistakes made by
human kind. The coming and going of Pizza, Lucky and the boy are repeated for the second act,
reinforcing the circular structure of the play. The way the main characters move, perpetually separating
and moving back together, is choreographed so they move in the same circular cycle of the play. This also
represents both the characters and the human race's course in life moving apart and together, making the
same mistakes, repeating history, going nowhere, just like Beckett's characters Vladimir and Estragon.
Beckett creates the different doubts and uneven situations in the play at different occasions. The
beginning of the play is traditional in setting and appearance. The writer do not give the idea are the
introduction of the all characters. The audios are not sure about the existence and the appearance of the
people in the start. The starting scene is basically a way to the all of the course in drama. The setting is
almost same in first episode. The dramatic characters are not about the introducing of the all of the
happenings in the play. Even viewers are not sure in the story happenings. All is due to the absurdity and
psychological violence in the drama. The start of the plays is also absurd in the dialogue as the words are
said ,The audience

39
"nothing to be done",
This is all the sense of the entrapment created by Bucket. The all system of the world Is depended upon
men and unfortunately all the events of the world are not in the command and control of men. Beckett's
captures the agony and the helplessness of man in the all issues of knife in his play through different
characters. The key concept is of the waiting for the imaginary character in order to save the destination
and the life that is actually godot. Beckett argues the religion. Controversially, he is depicting the idea of
the dependency of high level that is the Godot in the drama. The religious rebellion is there in the
proceeding context that the aiding is useless and go dot ill not come to rescue the humanity over the earth.
. "Nothing to be done" is the psychological lost defeat of the key character in the drama as Estragon. All
of the audience consider him as a painful and troubles character in the play. It is the strong interpretation
of the Lenin's publication What is to be Done?, and all of the humanity cannot be saved and new views
are not appropriate to make the human conditions as rescued in the absurd theatre. This is the all an
existentialist idea represented by Beckett in the play. Vladimir is at the concept of acceptance that the
nothing is the sense of the modern times. States, by displaying irony as we see in the, Vladimir Lenin,
coming to terms with the failure of his ideas put forward in What is to be Done? The whole agenda can
be interpreted by the answer of Vladimir I'm beginning to come around to that opinion. All my life I've
been trying to put it from me, saying, Vladimir, be reasonable, you haven't yet tried everything And I
resumed the struggle". Beckett introduced all of his characters in the descriptive and the verbal voice to
express his agenda of existentialism. All the subject matter of the play is about the society and the effects
of the two world wars and their influences. He consider the modern times as uncertain age. All the
proceeding dialogues and the characters are basically based on the theme of the existence. The Vladimir
argument is so here you are again", that is replied by Estragon "Am I?' is all absurd and uncertain in the
feelings and the thoughts. The start of the play is almost psychological and depicts the view of the

40
existentialism. By the sentence nothing to be done" and "Am I?" the writer is arguing his feelings and the
thoughts of the modern men. He is building the sense of feeling of his audios that the time is changing the
all of the ideas and the attitudes in the theater of absurd.
His main characters are absurd in appearance and the thoughts and the feelings in the play. He is building
the sense of the love and friendship by mean of the term of the philanthropy and the help of the friends in
modern times is in trouble. The dependency is there that both characters cannot live without each other in
the life as he stated abbot Estragon that nothing more than a little heap of bones at the present minute".
All of the play we find the all characters are in need of the other character as we see in the modern times
after wars the men is in need of the help and rescue by the other human being. The theme of love is
philosophically developed by the writer in the play as the eternal and the mundane dependency over each
other. The two type love and the similarity is reflected by the writer in the form of the main characters as
the Estragon and Vladimir on the other hand the minor characters as Pozzo and Lucky, all is the
immorality and selfishness of man and the world . The constant juxtaposing aspects are making the play
much interesting agent for the audios. The other aspects of the play also refer to the concept of the
existentialism and the uncertainty aroused by world war. All the dialoguers and the characters portrayed
by Beckett are in the state of confusion and uncertainty. He is representing the true life and the issues of
life and the age. The context of the play is ambiguous. The play is actually a keen reflection of the
attitudes of life and the dealings as a whole. The speech of Vladimir is the real representation is picture of
age and life of the absurd theatre. It is as we see Luckys tirade, an advocacy of the absurdity in the
reflection of drama. Both Vladimir and Estragon are fighting for nothing in acquiring the facility of the
highness by doing nothing and the effort is portrayed as the struggle for the fittest. He is in thought of the
life and its behavior in the form of circulation of life attitudes. They do not have any particular mean of
the waiting for the godot. The view of life and death is constantly focused in the play by mean of the

41
characters in the play.
, "Astride of a grave and a difficult birth. Down in the hole, lingeringly, the grave digger puts on the
forceps. We have time to grow old".
The key agenda of the play is all about the death and the existence. It is dealt under the perspective of the
disasters made by world wars and the nihilistic despair. The speech of the Vladimir is evocative in power
due to the confessional purely unaffected, Vladimir's statement I can't go on is actually deserted and the
based upon the emissary. Are desolating, almost a plea, and seemingly God answers him, by sending his
emissary?

Genus states as;;


By challenging religious and philosophical paradigms through the dialogue of his characters, Beckett
questions the humanity and beliefs typical of his context. As "nothing happens, twice", the audience is
being presented with the idea of "nothing to be done". Mistakes and major events are repeated by the
characters representing all of humanity. Life and time, World War grief, Cold war uncertainty and the
pointlessness of religion, is being mirrored by Waiting for Godot through Beckett's use of the repetitive
structure of absurd theatre. The philosophical, questioning dialogue of Beckett's characters captures the
challenging of prevailing paradigms and the personal ramifications of the political and philosophical
shifts in thinking of the era.

The absurdity of Beckets AND NOTHINGNESS

42

Beckett is one of the famous writers known as the absurd theatre pioneer and his plays are full with the
theme of existentialism. The current selected play is one of the most popular plays of his times and in the
context of the absurdity. My research is focused on the most prominent play waiting for godot. This is
the central play to understand the absurdity and the existentialism. This is historically known in the sense
of the existentialism indeed.
This movement was started in the middle of the 20th century and later on it got popularity in the all realms
of the world as an existentialist movement to rescue the men from the grip of the troubles of the word
wars and their influences. The dramatists like (Edward Albee, Eugene Ionesco, Harold Pinter, Jean
Genet, Vaclav Havel... are the key figures in the absurd theatre. The book of essays The Myth of
Sisyphus is the main source in the inspiration and attitude building in the context of the absurd theatre.
the work of Beckett is based upon the personal feelings and the emotions of the writer in the play of
waiting for godot. The theme of absurdity is based upon the literary movement started in the year of 1950.
This has strong link between the artists and philosophers, his all works are best examples of the
existentialism and the absurdity. Endgame, Happy Days, Krupps Last Tape, and Waiting for Godot, the
major plays written by Beckett. And current study is based upon the waiting for godot.
Beckett introduces the four major aspects in his [lay for the awareness of the reader in a unique sense.
These are the;
Unforeseeable
Sudden
Fatal
life feeling
The same context is represented by the writers of his age and afterwards. He introduces the aspects in a
nice colorful combination and the sense and the thought. He also describes ten absurdities in a symbolic

43
manner and diction too. The whole characters are imaginary nine natures. He discusses the emotions of
life and the behaviors of people of his age. The audios are not only the viewers but also the keen observer
in the nature and attitudes. His all characters are also stereotyped in nature and appearance. His approach
is multidimensional and trend setter. He is the true writer of the modern absurd dramatic art. His all the
characters are philosophical and logical in understanding for the readers and the audios. He argues the
problems of men in the existence on the earth. His use of the language is also philosophical in nature. The
research peeps into the traits of the personality of Beckett. The whole concept of absurdity is also
described in the research under the umbrella of the term existentialism the human attitudes and the fate is
also matter of discussion in the play. The all characters are also absurd in nature too.
The time is the key motif in the play. And the other concept is the motif of the waiting that remains
throughout the play. The lives of Beckett's characters seem to be unbearable and the end, death, very
slow in coming. Here I am interested in the characters' tragic lasting between life and death, which are not
mutually exclusive; Beckett's characters live in a state which is a combination of these two and the only
thing they long and hope for is the final arrival of "real death" which never approaches quickly.

Waiting for Godot was at first introduced and performed in the reign of the modern times in Paris. At first
there was great criticism on the writer and the text and characters of the play by different attitudes. The
current study is an attempt to create the sense of absurdity and the understanding of the writer behave and
the works as a whole. I see Beckett's dramatic work as art which has its own status independent of all of
the additional interpretation, as a kind of art which affects mostly the emotions perception rather than the
reason

44

CHAPTER 6
THE PLOT OF THE PLAY AND EXISTENTIALISM
The whole plot of the play is based upon the term existentialism. The key character was the two tramps
that were also in waiting and were much senile in the weight of the godot. They also fought for nothing
and the all matter was absurd and their wish for suicide and the restless sleep and their eating OF THE
CARRIOTS and licking the boon is a kind of the nothingness presented by the Beckett.
The concept of the slavery is also highlighted in the play by the writer. We see the grotesque scene in the
centre of the play as the climax. The story was much fascinated once a boy is coming with a news the

Godot will not come today

45

He says that the godot will come next day. The whole story of the play is surrounding about the title of the
play. The role of two tramps is absurd in nature by Beckett. The godot did not come and they remain in
waiting. The tree is also symbolic to the human sufferings and pains dry and fruitless.

The two tramps of Beckett are represented in a unique costume and dressing as the wearing of the antis
hats and the much tight shoes that are small in number. It remains as the Chaplin and the American
burlesque comedy team. Pozzo and Lucky are also the characters build by the writer as the master and the
slave. The whole discussion of the drama is historic and traditional in appearance and language. It also
talks about the clowns of the circus. The long speech of Lucky is useless and of nothing in purpose in the
play the play is too much far from the concept of the pastiche. The play has a unique attitude and beauty.
The Becketts characters are in hope for the godot and signified to the modern theory of existentialism.
The key concept in the play is the histrionic sense, the attitudes and places performed in classical tradition
of French plays. The play is focused over the three unities of the theater. It is also adhered to their
dramaturgy. The unity of place appears in different style of the muddy plateau with one tree. This place is
any place. The title of the godoth is not introduced in the drama as the main feature of the story... The
unity of time presented by the writer is another sense of the appearance in the play. The whole play is
consisted up [on the two days time that is not as the traditional concepts were presented in the play.

Tame is really immobility, although a few minor changes do take place during the play: the tree
grows leaves and one of the characters, Pozzo, becomes blind. The act of waiting is never over,
and yet it mysteriously starts up again each day. The action, in the same way, describes a circle.
Each day is the return to the beginning. Nothing is completed because nothing can be completed.

46

The despair in the play, which is never defined as such but which pervades all the lack of action
and gives the play its metaphysical color, is the fact that the two tramps cannot not wait for
Godot, and the corollary fact that he cannot come.

The rigorous placement of all the unities by the writer is based upon the characters and the substance of
the play that are related to the human life. Vladimir argues his friend: Aloes? On y va? ("Well? Shall we
go?") And Estragon answers: Allons-y ("Yes, let's go."). The response of the Vladimir is unmoved at the
situation. The writer argues the whole absurdity of mankind in the play. The attitude of the master to three
slaves is also of inhuman nature. Lucky is held on a leash by Pozzo. The suitcase is much heavy but he
does not care for it once he was dropping on the ground. The again a humoristic state represented by the
writer is that he was in position to deliver the speech once he was wearing the hat otherwise he was not
able to utter any sentence.

The third unity is the unity of place, the corner of the forest is not a real site for the trams in the play that
is striking in nature. No Exit. Becketts created unnamed plateau is also akin of absurdity. It resembles
with vaudeville stage. The two tramps are at the vague position in making their dialogues in the stage
without caring the time and the public.

Different ingenious theories are also in advanced introduced in the independent interpretations of all the
diction and the characters created by Becketts in the play. There is also the Religious and the mythical
interpretations present in the play. . Estragon (Gogol) and Vladimir (Did) are the philosophical and the
conscious in the nature... Gogo is less is represented by the writer as confident and at one end. Vladimir
the other character is more hopeful, and much emotional in attitude. The medieval attitude ann. the

47
debate is debate presented by different writers is the conflict between the between the body and the soul,
and it is also a conflict among the intellectual and the no rational of modern man. All of the dialogues and
the speeches are about the religion and its commands. Pozzo is presented as the notorious character in the
play. He may be attributed as the Go dot. The maximum realization of the Go dot is as the God but it is
also confusion in the plot of the play.

Beckett represents the attitude of the absurdity in the form of the term of the existentialism in the play.
His characters are symbolic in nature. These are nit aim and the meaningless. The imagination of the
writer is Christian soul and the religion in the main plot. The tree and the cross are the symbols of the
intellectual view of the religion. The trams are introduced as the fallen men on the earth facing the
troubles and misfortunes in the all life. The philanthropic attitude against the theme of marriage is also
inculcated in the plot of the play. . The play consists upon the series of actions and all that deals with the
aborted state and that makes the despairing and the maximum uniformity in the whole duration of play.

48

CHAPTER 7
Beckett's Absurd Characters 'Waiting for Godot'

It has been argued by different critics that that Waiting for Godot is an existentialist play, and it is proved
by the writer in all acts of the play it is the strong commentary over the sufferings of human beings.
The play, Waiting For Go dot, is all about the emotions and the feelings of men after the great disaster of
the world wars. Estragon and Vladimir are the key characters and they are waiting for Go dot, and the
absurd thought is the fact that they sod not have any acutance with the go dot. Estragon is at the feeling
that he may have affiliation and recognition with go dot.
"Personally I wouldn't know him if I ever saw him." (p.23).

49
Estragon also remarks, " we hardly know him." (p.23),
This is the developed thought of the dramatic symbolism that is illustrated in the form of the identity of
Mr. Go dot in an irrelevant way and, all the time the little information is ever given in the text of the play.
The key aspect of the play is the waiting state of all the characters. The critics have found the conclusion
of the thought of the go dot and the identity of the mysterious character created by Beckett. Beckett
represents the state of the introduced character in the form of the rhetorical question. He has given the
stress in the all dialogues of the play at the rethought of the go dot.
Estragon: Let's go.
Vladimir: We can't.
Estragon: Why not?
Vladimir: We're waiting for Go dot." (p.14).

The term of existentialism is consists upon the thought and the theme of the individual's freedom in
worldly choice, ant it is also believed in the sense that the all humans are controlled by a pre-existing
omnipotent and their whole fate is depended upon that thought and the religion.. Estragon and Vladimir
are independent in their liking me the wait for the go dot. Vladimir says,
"He didn't say for sure he'd come" (p.14),
But decides to "wait till we know exactly how we stand" (p.18).

Albert Camus an existentialist playwright states that this is the wrong influence of the border and the
waiting that is actually an extreme agent in changing our daily routine and even our habits. Estragon and
Vladimir dint of the wait in the play. Camus argues ion the plague that;

50
Boredom or inactivity causes the individual to think. This is also similar to the idea of meditation, an
almost motionless activity, allowing the individual to think with clarity. Camus, and other existential
writers, suggested that attempting to answer these rhetorical questions could drive someone to the point
of insanity. The tramps continually attempt to prove that they exist, in order to keep their sanity:
We always find something, eh Did, to give us the impression that we exist?" (p.69).

Waiting is the main figure in the play reflecting the monotonous and trouble in the play. The writer is
introducing the play as an absurd play And the repetition of the dialogues is the state of the border in the
viewers and the readers in the diction of the play. Vladimir and Estragon interactions and the dialogues is
the are rhetorical and useless and aimless. The different words in the play as
who is Godot? Where are Gogo and Didi? Who beats Gogo?
All these questions are unanswered questions Vis a vies if is there a God? And the other question Where
do we come from? Who is responsible for our suffering?
The existentialist philosopher Martin Heidegger argues ;
The tramps in the drama are the true picture of the age in the form of the human feelings and the
sufferings in the play as an absurd action. The dress nosed by the writer is symbolic in nature. It
represents the miseries of mankind.
Jean Paul Sartre made universe dement rational life and the it has the dull passion. Estragon and Vladimir
in the play have efforts to wait for the Go dot and he never arrives. They have the tension and they say
constantly as All my life I've tried to put it from me And I resumed the struggle." (p.9).

51
"Estragon: (anxious). And we? Where do we come in?" (p.19).

Estragon' starting question remained unanswered by Vladimir. Actually these are the entire nonsense one
that made him sad and troublous. The all were based upon the concept of despair and gloomy attitude.
They were in same in thoughts and thinks for the suicide in the play; they wanted to hand themselves with
the tree, this all as the state of trouble and the anxiety. Kierkegaard t ion the hanks the anxiety
philosophical view of 'Dread' or 'Angst';
Estragon: Well, shall we go?
Vladimir: Yes, let's go.

They do not move" (p.54).

Beckett and in philosopher thinking. Is representing the men In the sensitive way degrade thermion
sensitive onion nature. He considered the all pains and the bad luck is the protecting agents as the habit.
Proust says

"Habit is a compromise affected between the individual and his environment, or between the individual
and his own organic eccentricities, the guarantee of a dull inviolability, the lightening-conductor of his
existence. Habit is the ballast that chains the dog to his vomit. Breathing is habit. Life is habit."

Estragon and Vladimir are the dull characters in the play that want to constantly 'pass the time' throughout
the play the hopelessness is theme problem and he wants to study deeply in thee play deeply. Vladimir
expresses this idea at the end of the play, 'Habit is a great deadener', suggesting that habit is like an

52
analgesic - numbing the individual. The play is mostly ritual, with Estragon and Vladimir filling the
emptiness and silence. "It'll pass the time, (p.12), explains Vladimir, offering to tell the story of the
Crucifixion. Passing the time is their mutual
Vladimir: That passed the time.
Estragon: It would have passed in any case.
Vladimir: Yes, but not so rapidly." (p.48).

Estragon also joins in the game - "That's the idea, let's make a little conversation." (p.48). The rituals by
which Estragon and Vladimir combat silence and emptiness are elaborate, original and display Beckett's
skill as a writer. In the play Beckett echoes patterns of question, answer and repetition which is his
alternative to all the flaccid chat and triviality of the conventionally 'well-structured play'. Since his
subject is habit and boredom, he has dispensed with plot; since his characters are without much history.
Even the scenery is minimal - consisting of a tree and the road. Beckett deliberately employs the
repetition of themes, speech and action to highlight the futility and habit of life. Gogol and Dido
frequently repeat phrases, such as, "Nothing to be done". Their actions consist of ritually inspecting their
hats. Nothingness is what the two tramps are essentially fighting against and reason why they talk.
Beckett suggests that activity and inactivity oppose one another: thought arising from inactivity and
activity terminating thought. In the second Act they admit that habit suppresses their thoughts and keeps
their minimal sanity:
Estragon: we are incapable of keeping silent.
Vladimir: You're right we're inexhaustible.
Estragon: It's so we won't think." (p.62).

53
Estragon and Vare the Vladimir symbolized characters of the human condition and are in prolonged
period of waiting. The society and their lives are in quest of four goals, the hope is the desire of the h
attaining a higherigh attachment. . Beckett argues that the time is inexorable journey. Vladimir says it is
the mocked situation in the play. , "One is what one is. The essential doesn't change.", (p.21

Beckett argues the key illusion of the expresses 'cancer', and points out the progress of the 2o0th century
as the killing object to the humanity and the progress. Estragon and Vladimir are same as begin to the end
in the play. Nothing is to be done by them in the play. Beckett says in his most well known essay as the
wrote in his 'poisonous' condition of the modern century that has brought the men to the disaster point.
The progress is a killing factor in the form of the atomic explosions that created the sense of the absurdity
in all the characters of the play. "Nothing is certain when you're about." (p.14). the issue of the memory of
all characters is also inculcated in the play by the writer.
Vladimir: What was it you wanted to know?
Estragon: I've forgotten. (Chews.) That's what annoys me." (p.20).

Time causes is the presented as the energy builder and the destroyer. The hanging effort is a mockery in
the play at the sufferings and the weakness of men. The nightmares are symbols of the fear that is faced
by men and is a painful aspect in the absurd society; the beauty is that Beckett is using ordinary language,
characters and the plot in the play as compare to men in the world. Beckett's bitterness in the form of s
time is illustrated as the Pozzo's bleak speech:
"(Suddenly furious). Have you not done tormenting me with your accursed time! one day I went blind
one day we were born, one day we shall die, the same day, the same second, is that not enough for

54
you? (Calmer.) They give birth astride of a grave, the light gleams an instant, then its night once more."
(p.89).

The play is supplement of the time, it and the cycles of the time is reflected in the existentialist society.
The pattern of the time is indicated in the two days period in the play. It is also linear in nature and
developed by the writer in linear position. Estragon and Vladimir are inquest of the unobtainable
desires and these are not fulfilled in the play start to end
Nothing happens, nobody comes, nobody goes, and its awful!" (p.41).

Estragon and Vladimir remain fail to give the reason of their attempt of the suicide in the play. Estragon
says, "Like to finish it?" (p.21). Estragon says leaf motif theory, saying that a similar person with
smaller feet will fill his boot Another will come, just as as as me, but with smaller feet (p.52
eternal waiting theory is developed in the play as the half play is completed and the second act starts:
" Then all the dogs came running
And dug the dog a tombHe stops, broods, resumes:
Then all the dogs came running
And dug the dog a tomb" (p.58).

The play is totally unnatural. The all ideas and the characters are abstract because it was the natural
attitude in the Becketts times. . Estragon and Vladimir are s fragmented in the time aspect by the writer
and these are representing the culture and the traditions of their times.

55
I remember the maps with of the Holy Land. Colored they were." (p.12).

The tramps also have limited knowledge and they are embedded it the taste of the culture.
Beckett argues that the uncertain situation IS AROUSE IN THE PLAY BY world arts impacts over the
society. The characters of the play are not in sure that the future is expected. " what do we do now that
we're happy go on waiting waiting let me think it's coming go on waiting" (p.65).

Proust states as
An individual wakes a literally new person with their past memories intact to help them govern their
actions in the present. Beckett raises questions about the past or memory governing the individual's
identity. The characters identities are uncertain, as the past and their memories are uncertain. Vladimir
tries to come to terms with his existence and the human condition: "It's too much for one man. On the
other hand what's the point of losing heart now" (p.10).

Bishop Berkeley proposed the philosophical hypothesis that being perceived was being or existing.
Vladimir desperately asks the boy, "You did see us, didn't you?" (p.52), and Estragon later questions, "Do
you think God sees me?" (p.76), because they are uncertain about their own senses, reality and existence.
Beckett poses the theory that reality is based on the human perception. Schopenhauer devised the vision,
akin to Buddhism, that the desiring self does not exist in any 'real' sense, except through the painful
consequences of willful self-assertion.

Estragon asks, "We've lost our rights? while Vladimir replies, "We got rid of them." (p.19). Perhaps they
are pondering the idea that they have no choice in their future and think their fate is preordained, although

56
this would contradict the existentialist notion of free will. The tramps cannot perceive the future and
therefore would be unable to know if their future is preordained. Equally, the tramps could have 'no rights'
because they are devoted to the task of waiting. Heidegger said that instead of trying to comprehend one's
existence each individual must choose a goal and follow it with passionate conviction.

Beckett portrays the condition of the man in the painful stratus and says the it is the sin of men that born
on the earth. Estragon and Vladimir refer to the basic tendencies of life. Vladimir ponders about
repenting being born. Estragon's references to Christ represent his sympathy towards suffering as well as
symbolizing human suffering:
Vladimir: What's Christ got to do with it?
Estragon: All my life I've compared myself to him. And they crucified quick!" (p.52).

Laurel and Hardy argues in the context that;


Vladimir: Pull on your trousers.
Estragon: What?
Vladimir: Pull on your trousers.
Estragon: You want me to pull off my trousers?
Vladimir: Pull ON your trousers.
Estragon: (realizing his trousers are down) True. (He pulls up his trousers.)"

Laurel and Hardy travelled together and felt the feelings of the exasperation that do not seem to age and
none the wiser. Laurel is one of the easy and the most anxious while Hardy tended to solicit a philosophic

57
calm.
For example, in Way Out West (1937) (A readers Guide to Samuel Beckett - Hugh Kenner):
Hardy: Get on the mule.
Laurel: What?
Hardy: Get on the mule."

Blas Pascal considered the human life as paradoxes:


The human self is itself a paradox and contradiction. Estragon and Vladimir are full of contradictions, as
their emotions often change erratically from violence to sympathy, from the philosophical to the banal.
Pizzas cruelty towards Lucky emphasizes the contradictions in human nature. They share a master-slave
relationship in which Pozzo can be the worst of all tyrants, shouting authoritarian instructions at Lucky,
such as, "Up pig!" (p.23), and yet can be equally filled with self-pity?
" I can't bear it any longer the way he goes on you've no idea it's terrible" (p.34).

Beckett creating the sense of balance and the illustration is given in the form of the characters and the
emotions of the dialogues in rhea real dramatic developed in the existentialist thoughts, Estragon is
introduced as the body while the other character Vladimir as the mind in the all dialogues of the play.
Represents a man of the body and Vladimir represents a man of the mind. Pascal is also representing the
same tendency in confliction of the mind and the body as the different classes and the people in the
society.
Vladimir: (gloomily). It's too much for one man. (Pause. Cheerfully.) On the other hand what's the good

58
of losing heart now, that's what I say? We should have thought of it a million years ago, in the nineties."
(p.10).

Estragon: Ah stop blathering and help me off with this bloody thing." (p.10).

To summarize the play Waiting For Go dot is the whole a bleak view of the society and it is as the
simplistic presumption, Estragon and Vladimir have epitomize the whole society by their deeds. The
mankind is related to the religion and the dam while Estragon and Vladimir remain in suffering in the play
and have the pleasant but cruel appearance to show the attitude of the society in their dealings. Estragon
and Vladimir are meeting and calling each other in the name of the Dido. "Forgive me Come, Dido.
Give me your hand. Embrace me!" (p.17). Even the beauty and happiness is portrayed, as Gogo
finds Lucky amusing, "He's a scream. (Laughs noisily.)" (p.35). Bibliography:

59

Quotes
Waiting for Go dot is a play by Samuel Beckett. The play depicts the meaninglessness of
life--with its repetitive plot, where nothing much happens. Here are a few quotes from
Waiting for Go dot.

"Let's go. Yes, let's go. (They do not move)."

"Nothing to be done."

"The tears of the world are a constant quantity. For each one who begins to weep
somewhere else another stops. The same is true of the laugh. Let us not then speak ill of
our generation, it is not any unhappier than its predecessors. Let us not speak well of it
either. Let us not speak of it at all. It is true the population has increased."

60

"Astride of a grave and a difficult birth. Down in the hole, lingeringly, the gravedigger
puts on the forceps."

"I don't seem to be able... (long hesitation) to depart."

"Such is life."

"Our Savior. Two thieves. One is supposed to have been saved and the other (he searches
for the contrary of saved) damned."

"Saved from what?"

"We are all born mad. Some remain so."

"Let us not waste our time in idle discourse! (Pause. Vehemently.) Let us do something,
while we have the chance! It is not every day that we are needed. But at this place, at this
moment of time, all mankind is us, whether we like it or not. Let us make the most of it,
before it is too late!"

61

"But that is not the question. Why are we here that are the question? And we are blessed in
this that we happen to know the answer. Yes, in this immense confusion one thing alone is
clear. We are waiting for Go dot to come."

"To-morrow, when I wake, or think I do, what shall I say of to-day?"

"Astride of a grave and a difficult birth. Down in the hole, lingeringly, the grave-digger
puts on the forceps. We have time to grow old. The air is full of our cries. (He listens.) But
habit is a great deadener."

"We wait. We are bored. (He throws up his hand.) No, don't protest, we are bored to
death, there's no denying it. Good. A diversion comes along and what do we do? We let it
go to waste... In an instant all will vanish and we'll be alone once more, in the midst of
nothingness!"

62

5. CONCLUSION

Beckett is one of the famous writers known as the absurd theatre pioneer and his plays are full
with the theme of existentialism. The current selected play is one of the most popular plays of his
times and in the context of the absurdity. My research is focused on the most prominent play
waiting for go dot. This is the central play to understand the absurdity and the existentialism.
This is historically known in the sense of the existentialism indeed.
This movement was started in the middle of the 20th century and later on it got popularity in the
all realms of the world as an existentialist movement to rescue the men from the grip of the
troubles of the word wars and their influences. The dramatists like (Edward Albee, Eugene
Ionesco, Harold Pinter, Jean Genet, Vaclav Havel... are the key figures in the absurd theatre.
The book of essays The Myth of Sisyphus is the main source in the inspiration and attitude
building in the context of the absurd theatre. The work of Beckett is based upon the personal
feelings and the emotions of the writer in the play of waiting for go dot. The theme of absurdity
is based upon the literary movement started in the year of 1950. This has strong link between the
artists and philosophers, his all works are best examples of the existentialism and the absurdity.

63
Endgame, Happy Days, Krupps Last Tape, and Waiting for Godot, the major plays written by
Beckett. And current study is based upon the waiting for godot.
Beckett introduces the four major aspects in his [lay for the awareness of the reader in a unique
sense

. These are the;


Unforeseeable
Sudden
Fatal
Life feeling
The same context is represented by the writers of his age and afterwards. He introduces the
aspects in a nice colorful combination and the sense and the thought. He also describes ten
absurdities in a symbolic manner and diction too. The whole characters are imaginary nine
natures. He discusses the emotions of life and the behaviors of people of his age. The audios are
not only the viewers but also the keen observer in the nature and attitudes. His all characters are
also stereotyped in nature and appearance. His approach is multidimensional and trend setter. He
is the true writer of the modern absurd dramatic art. His all the characters are philosophical and
logical in understanding for the readers and the audios. He argues the problems of men in the
existence on the earth. His use of the language is also philosophical in nature. The research peeps
into the traits of the personality of Beckett. The whole concept of absurdity is also described in
the research under the umbrella of the term existentialism the human attitudes and the fate is also
matter of discussion in the play. The all characters are also absurd in nature too.

64
The time is the key motif in the play. And the other concept is the motif of the waiting that
remains throughout the play. The lives of Beckett's characters seem to be unbearable and the
end, death, very slow in coming. Here I am interested in the characters' tragic lasting between
life and death, which are not mutually exclusive; Beckett's characters live in a state which is a
combination of these two and the only thing they long and hope for is the final arrival of "real
death" which never approaches quickly.

Waiting for Go dot was at first introduced and performed in the reign of the modern times in
Paris. At first there was great criticism on the writer and the text and characters of the play by
different attitudes. The current study is an attempt to create the sense of absurdity and the
understanding of the writer behave and the works as a whole. I see Beckett's dramatic work as
art which has its own status independent of all of the additional interpretation, as a kind of art
which affects mostly the emotions perception rather than the reason

65

BIBLIOGRAPHY / REFERENCES
Beckett, Samuel. Endgame. New York: Grove Press, Inc, 1978.
Beckett, Samuel. Happy Days. London: Grove Press Inc, 1970.
Secondary Sources
Adorno, Theodor W. Trying to Understand Endgame. Beckett and Philosophy.
Richard Lane, ed. New York: Palgrave, 2002. 39-49.
Andonian, Culotta ed. The Critical Response to Samuel Beckett. London:
Greenwood Press, 1998.
Birkett, Jennifer and Kate Ince. Samuel Beckett. London and New York:
Longman, 2000.
Blackham, H. J. Six Existentialist Thinkers. London: Routledge & Keagen Paul
Ltd, 1952.
Bohlmann, Otto. Conrads Existentialism. Basignstoke: Macmillan, 1991.
Buning, Marius. Beckett versus Beckett. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998.
Butler, Lance St. John. Samuel Beckett and the Meaning of Being. New York: St.
Martins Press, 1984.

66

Butler, Lance St. John. Ed. Critical Essays on Samuel Beckett. Aldershot: Scholar
Press, 1993.
Chambers, Colin. Playwrights Progress: Patterns of Postwar British Drama.
Oxford: Amber Lane Press, 1987.
Clurman, Harold. Late Theatrical Works: Theatre (Review of Happy Days)
Cathleen Culotta Andonian, ed. London: Greenwood Press, 1998, 233235.
Cohn, Ruby. Back to Beckett. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1973.
Critchley, Simon. Ed. A Companion to Continental Philosophy,Oxford: Blackwell,
1998. 109
Dobree, Bonamy. The London Theater, 1957: The Melting Pot. Sewanee Review,
66, no.1 (Winter): 146-60.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. Heidegger Reexamined. New York: Routledge, 2002.
The Dublin Magazine. Reflections on Samuel Becketts New Work for the French
Theatre. April-June: 18-22, 1957.
Ellis, Robert R. The Tragic Pursuit of Being: Unamuno and Sartre. Tuscaloosa and
London: The University of Alabama Press, 1988.
Fletcher, John and John Spurling. Son of Oedipus: Beckett: A Study of His Plays.
London: MacMillan, 1972.
Fowlie, Wallace. Dionysus in Paris. New York: Meridian Books, 1960.

67

Gaensbauer, Deborah B. The French Theater of the Absurd The French Rewiev,
Vol. 66, No.5 (Apr., 1993), 821-822.
Gilman, Richard. The Stage: Becketts Happy Days. The Critical Response to
Samuel Beckett. Cathleen Culotta Andonian, ed. London: Greenwood Press,
1998, 235-237.
Golomb, Jacob. In Search of Authenticity: from Kierkegaard to Camus. London &
New York: Routledge, 1995.
Heidegger, Martin. Basic Writings: from Being and Time (1927) to The Task of
Thinking (1964)/Martin Heidegger, ed. David Farrell Krell. San Francisco:
HarperSanFrancisco, 1993.
Heidegger, Martin. Contributions to Philosophy (From Enowning). Parvis Emad
and Kenneth Maly, eds. Indiana polis: Indiana University Press, 1999.
Hinchliffe, Arnold P. The Absurd. London: Methuen, 1985.
Iser, Wolfgang. Samuel Becketts Dramatic Language, Critical Essays on Samuel
Beckett. Lance Butler, ed. Aldershot: Scholar Press, 1993.
Iser, Wolfgang. The Art of Failure: The Stifled Laugh in Becketts Theater in
Jennifer Birkett and Kate Ince, eds. Samuel Beckett. London and New York:
Longman, 2000.

You might also like