2-Corrosion Rate Measurement
2-Corrosion Rate Measurement
2-Corrosion Rate Measurement
corrodes to this:
How would we know how much corrosion had occurred? Clearly, we need before and after measurements Mass?
Weigh before, weigh after To be of any use, a weight loss measurement has to be scaled to the size of the specimen corrosion is a surface related phenomenon.
M Mass? ?
Weigh before, weigh after To be of any use, use a weight loss measurement has to be scaled to the size of the specimen corrosion is a surface related phenomenon.
1 mg Total corrosion = 10 cm 2
which should be a characteristic amount for that metal in that environment in a month.
BUT even though mdms give reasonable numbers for most corrosion situations situations, the month is a bad unit
So,
mg dm 2 day
10
A Another th common unit it for f corrosion i penetration t ti (in (i the th US) i is the th mil or milli-inch per year (=0.001 in/year or mpy).
m
yr
z mil 25.4 yr
Corrosion rate 1 =
M1 T1
Corrosion rate 2 =
M2 T2
8
It is covered with scale. How would we assess corrosion under these conditions?
10
11
(W0 W2 ) 1000 mg mg 2 A 1g dm
(W1 W2 ) g scale = A dm 2
If we assume the scale is composed of Fe2O3, we can calculate the iron in scale as
The difference between iron in scale and total amount corroded is either
Iron released to environment OR Iron deposited p from environment
13
How Do We Descale?
Chemically or electrochemically usually in weak acids (See Table 1.2). BUT such descaling can also dissolve some of the remaining metal, so how h do d we account t for f thi this? ?
Employ an inhibitor Use a blank Figure 1.24. (ASTM G1)
14
Summary
Simplest and most powerful technique for corrosion rate determination is the Weight Loss Technique Corrosion Rate = mass/[(exposed surface area] [time]) or = Average corrosion penetration depth/time = (mass/density/surface area/time) Common Corrosion Rate Units
gmd: grams of metal loss per square meter per day (mdd (mdd) ) mm/y: / average millimeters illi t penetration t ti per year mpy: average mils penetration per year, 1 mil = 0.001 inch)
15
16
through through-wall wall for tubes tubes, pipes pipes, vessels vessels, etc etc.; ;
propagation rate
m
yr
mm etc. yr
17
18
NonNon-electrochemical methods
Electrical resistance (ER) Hydrogen monitoring Chemical analysis Microscopy
19
Corrosion Coupons
Various coupon shapes and sizes
ASTM G58
20
Electrochemical Techniques
22
Electrochemical Polarization
Involving large perturbation
Potentiodynamic polarization ( (Tafel Tafel analysis)
Involving g no perturbation p
Corrosion potential (Ecorr) Electrochemical noise (EN)
23
L R= A
24
ER Probe Types
Image source: (1) Alabama Specialty Products, www.metalsamples.com (2) S.Y. Li et al., Mat. Chem. Phys., 103 (2007) 9
25
Pot 1
Pot 2
As hydrogen passes through the metallic wall of the vessel it enters a probe chamber attached tightly to the outside wall, leading to
Pressure increase with time within the chamber An electrochemical current resulting from the oxidation of hydrogen under an applied potential A current generated in an external circuit, as hydrogen enters a miniature fuel cell.
Oxidize Side
+ H + OH -> H O 2
Devanathan-Starchurski Technique
27
SEM image of a cross section of a steel specimen including an iron carbonate film. Exposed for 10 hrs at T=80oC, pH 6.6, PCO2 = 0.54 bar, Fe2+ = 250 ppm, v = 1 m/s
28
29
Radiographic Inspection
30
OTHER Corrositex Assay y DuPont SW800M SSAT DuPont SW1P Ferroxyl Test
31
Homework
1) What are the four component of a corrosion cell and list five different cathodic reactions DO NOT LIST FIVE METAL REDUCTION REACTIONS!!! 2) Problems 1-4 3) Problems 1 1-9 Due: Next week
32