Pere 2013 Top 50
Pere 2013 Top 50
Pere 2013 Top 50
Methodology
The PERE 50 measures equity raised between 1 January 2008 and mid-April 2013 for direct real estate investment through closed-ended, commingled real estate funds and co-investment vehicles that sit alongside those funds. The vehicles must give the GP discretion over the capital, meaning club funds, separate accounts and joint ventures are excluded from the ranking. Also excluded are funds with strategies other than value-added and opportunistic, such as core and core-plus, as well as those not focused on direct real estate, like fund of funds and debt funds, and funds where the primary strategy is not real estatefocused, such as general private equity.
A post-crisis shake-up
The elimination of funds closed in 2007 from this years ranking has caused the biggest reshuffling of top rms in recent memory
Changes abound in this years ranking of the largest private equity real estate in the world in terms of fundraising activity. First and most obvious is that the ranking has expanded from 30 firms to 50 this year. This is partly the result of the increased capabilities of PERE s Research & Analytics team, which did much of the grunt work for this years ranking, as well as the desire to offer our readers a wider, more comprehensive look at fundraising activity across the market. Secondly, the PERE 50 has experienced the biggest reshuffling of firms at the top of the ranking in recent memory. Much of this is due to the elimination of large funds that closed in 2007 and now fall outside the rankings five-year fundraising window. Among the casualties are the real estate investment arms of investment banks Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, which declined nine and five spots respectively, as well as private real estate firms such as Beacon Capital Partners and Rockpoint Group. Indeed, Beacon fell 20 places as some $4 billion was shaved from its five-year tally, while Rockpoint dropped 16 spots and now is relying solely on the fund it just closed earlier this year. The problem for these firms is that much of the capital that has fallen outside the PERE 50s five-year fundraising window has not been replaced with new equity or it has been replaced at a slower rate and with a lesser amount. Meanwhile, a number of firms have shifted their focus to strategies that are not included in the PERE 50 ranking, such as real estate debt, or have stopped raising their capital through traditional closed-ended commingled funds in favor of other structures sought by LPs. That said, some firms did find success with new vehicles over the past five quarters. Indeed, three of the biggest fundraisers over the past five quarters also happen to be the biggest climbers in the PERE 50. Starwood Capital Group closed its latest opportunity fund on $4.2 billion, which propelled the firm some 10 spots in the ranking. Brookfield Asset Management, which is in the middle of marketing its first global opportunity fund, moved up 14 spots on the strength of $2.63 billion in equity raised so far. Last but not least, Fortress Investment Group also jumped 14 spots in the ranking due largely to the success of its second Japan-focused fund, which closed on $1.65 billion late last year. In the face of all those changes, one thing did not change. The Blackstone Group cemented its place as far and away the biggest capital-raiser in the PERE 50 ranking, thanks to the $13.3 billion collected for its most-recent global offering, which is the largest commingled real estate fund ever raised. Indeed, so big is that fund that, had Blackstone not raised another penny over the past five years, the firm still would be atop the ranking. As it is, it raised a total of nearly $32 billion, which is more than the next four firm combined. Looking at the PERE 50 as a whole, the cutoff for capital raised in order to make this years ranking was $1.37 billion over the past five years. Obviously, that is much less than the $2.21 billion cut-off of last year, when just 30 firms were ranked. However, if you look at just the top 30 firms this year, you will see that the cut-off for that sub-group rose to $2.42 billion. Meanwhile, the expansion of the ranking, as well as the aforementioned reshuffling of firms, has opened the door for several new players to emerge. First-time members of the PERE 50 include notable firms like CapitaLand, Oaktree Capital Management, Niam, GTIS Partners and Crow Holdings, among others. In addition, there were five firms $60 million or less from making the PERE 50, including Europa Capital Management and Iron Point Real Estate Partners. With the disappearance of 2008 funds in next years ranking, it is a good bet that these firms will make the cut in 2014.
2013 Rank
2012 Rank
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
Legend:
The Blackstone Group Starwood Capital Group Lone Star Funds Colony Capital LaSalle Investment Management Tishman Speyer The Carlyle Group Goldman Sachs Real Estate Principal Investment Area Brookfield Asset Management MGPA Morgan Stanley Real Estate Investing CBRE Global Investors Westbrook Partners AREA Property Partners Angelo, Gordon & Co Prudential Real Estate Investors Shorenstein Properties CapitaLand Fortress Investment Group TA Associates Realty Oaktree Capital Mangement Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Principal Investments Walton Street Capital Northwood Investors Perella Weinberg Partners Lubert-Adler Partners AEW Global Beacon Capital Partners Orion Capital Managers Alpha Investment Partners DRA Advisors KSL Capital Partners ARA Asset Management Rockpoint Group Niam Hemisferio Sul Investimentos Hines GI Partners Cerberus Capital Management GTIS Partners Invesco Real Estate Crow Holdings CIM Group Rockwood Capital Berkshire Property Advisors Harrison Street Real Estate Capital GE Capital Real Estate Kayne Anderson Real Estate Advisors Spear Street Capital Stockbridge Capital Group TOtAL EQUItY RAISED SINCE 2008
Higher rank than 2012 Lower rank than 2012 Same rank as 2012
$31.947 $7.868 $7.864 $7.709 $7.395 $7.340 $7.337 $5.626 $5.250 $5.200 $4.767 $4.181 $4.088 $4.055 $3.798 $3.531 $3.295 $3.295 $3.159 $3.068 $3.021 $2.992 $2.887 $2.809 $2.710 $2.604 $2.561 $2.541 $2.491 $2.420 $2,250 $2.211 $2.074 $1.952 $1.910 $1.899 $1.884 $1.864 $1.830 $1.791 $1.662 $1.649 $1.632 $1.629 $1.619 $1.518 $1.514 $1.411 $1.400 $1.370 $192.876
1 12 7 5 10 4 6 3 23 11 2 13 9 14 17 15 19 33 16 20 30 28 24 21 8 38 29 31 34 18 22 37 41 27
PERE 50 debut
PERE 50 return
Thanks to the popularity of its latest distressed fund, Starwood Capital Group, led by Barry Sternlicht, has shot 10 places up the ranking to the number two spot this year. Starwood Distressed Opportunity Fund IX, which was launched in August 2011 with a target between $2 billion and $3 billion, ultimately garnered a whopping $4.2 billion in equity commitments, making it the firms largest private investment fund to date. 1372 Broadway: an early Helping the opportunity fund to exceed its target was investment the fact that, for the first time in its history, Starwood offered management fee breaks to institutional investors joining the first close and to larger investors committing more than $150 million of equity. Such incentives allowed the firm to corral commitments from a diverse group of pensions, endowments and foundations, as well as foreign institutions, including the New York State Teachers Retirement System, the Florida State Board of Administration and the Teacher Retirement System of Texas. Fund IX is focused predominantly on distressed opportunities in the US, although Starwood is believed to be eyeing Europe and Brazil for opportunities as well. Already, the firm has made a number of investments on behalf of the vehicle, including the purchase of a 9,500-unit multifamily portfolio with Gaia Real Estate last May and the acquisition of 1372 Broadway in New York. In addition, earlier this year, Starwood and its REIT affiliate Starwood Property Trust agreed to acquire Miami-based special servicer LNR Property for $1 billion. In terms of the firms strategy, Sternlicht told PERE in an interview that, despite its opportunistic focus, Starwood likes to choose its investments cautiously. Theres risk in the world, he said. Therefore, were investing with a big margin of safety because we need to preserve capital for a wide range of outcomes.
Even though it hasnt raised any new dedicated capital for real estate since 2011, Lone Star Funds still makes it to the top three of the PERE 50 since it has managed to raise roughly $7.86 billion in equity over the past five-plus years. In fact, the John Grayken-led firm raised $5.5 billion on behalf of Lone Star Real Estate Fund II alone, which along with The Blackstone Groups Blackstone Real Estate Partners VII fund helped keep the mega-fund alive following the global Grayken: busy financial crisis. investing Currently, Lone Star is busy buying up assets on behalf of Fund II. For example, the Dallas-based investment firm bought a distressed loan book valued at 900 million (1.1 billion; $1.4 billion) from Lloyds Banking Group in late 2011 and agreed to buy the A and B notes of Excalibur, Lehman Brothers 1.8 billion legacy securitized real estate debt portfolio, from Deutsche Bundesbank last year. Most recently, in December, Lone Star agreed to buy TLG Immobilien for 1.1 billion in what was one of the largest commercial property transactions in Germany last year, as well as the first privatization in the country since the onset of the global financial crisis. At its current rate of investment, it appears as though it wont be long before Lone Stars latest opportunistic fund will be fully invested. In fact, there are rumors that the firm could be back on the fundraising trail with its third real estate fund within the coming year.
36
Last year, Colony Capital closed on $1.4 billion in base and co-investment capital for its latest debt fund, Colony Distressed Credit Fund (CDCF) II. Despite being one of the largest fundraises of 2012, that capital did not help the Los Angeles-based firm in the PERE 50 ranking, which does not count debt vehicles towards its fundraising totals. Luckily, Colony was active on the equity side of its business as well. Helping to solidify Colonys position within the top five of the PERE 50 ranking is Colony Realty Partners IV, which held a first close on $225 million in equity at the end of last year. More significantly, the firm raised a total of $2.24 billion in investor capital for Colony American Homes, its vehicle for purchasing portfolios of distressed single-family homes across the US. The strategy there is to fix up those properties and rent them out rather than sell them, and Barrack: focusing Colony anticipates amassing 10,000 to 15,000 homes by the more on debt middle of this year. PERE understands that Colony, led by Tom Barrack, currently is focused on investing in debt rather than equity because of the greater number of compelling deals in the debt space. In fact, so robust is the opportunity in debt that the firm is planning to launch a successor fund to CDCF II sometime this year.
Over the past year or so, LaSalle Investment Management has focused its investment activity primarily on the US and the markets of Asia. Consequently, the Chicago-based real estate investment managers recent fundraising activity has focused on those markets as well, with the firm raising $50 million towards its $750 million target for LaSalle Asia Opportunity Fund IV and $305 million against its $600 million goal for LaSalle Income & Growth Fund VI. In addition, LaSalle formed a $205 million separate account last year to provide liquidity to real estate ownership structures. The opportunistic vehicle, named Salt River Investors after the river in Arizona, will focus on asset and fund-level recapitalizations throughout the US, as well as secondary purchases of joint venture or fund interests. The capital is flexible in structure and can take the form of structured debt, preferred equity or common equity. In terms of the firms recent activity in the Japanese market, it was revealed earlier this year that LaSalle had put a portfolio of eight logistics properties in the Tokyo and Osaka areas up for sale. The firm is looking to sell the assets from its second logistics fund, LaSalle Japan Logistics Fund II, for approximately 95 billion (763.3 billion; $1.01 billion). Meanwhile, the firm is busy raising equity for the latest fund in that series. LaSalle established its Asia platform in 2000 and, as of April 2012, had approximately 180 staff and nearly $9 billion in assets under management in the region. Last spring, the firms plans to focus on country-specific funds in Asia led it to agree to relinquish its responsibility for the Asia Property Fund, the regions first open-ended core fund. LaSalle launched the vehicle in 2007 with an initial $600 million in assets alongside PRUPIM, which has agreed to assume sole responsibility for managing the fund.
Tishman Speyer has been very busy the past couple of years, particularly in the US and Latin America. Although the New York-based developer and fund manager has never been particularly talkative about its investment activities, it closed two significant funds over the past year, one focused on the US and the other on Brazil. Last month, PERE learned that Tishman Speyer had closed its latest US real estate vehicle, Tishman Speyer Real Estate Venture VIII, raising approximately $700 million in commitments. Venture VIII will be focused on value-added investments in North America, following a similar strategy to that of its predecessor, Tishman Speyer Real Estate Venture VII, which closed on a total of $1.5 billion in 2008. In addition, Tishman Speyer raised a total of $539.5 million for its Tishman Speyer Brazil Fund III and a related feeder fund in August. Brazil Fund III will be similar in nature to the inMairar in So vestment managers Paulo: a new two previous oppordevelopment tunistic funds targeting Brazil, meaning it will focus on development opportunities. Tishman Speyer began investing in Brazil in the 1990s and currently owns 17 properties in Braslia, Rio de Janeiro and So Paulo, according to the firms website. One year earlier, in August 2011, Tishman Speyer had closed on $230 million for both its third Brazil fund and the feeder fund, according to US Securities and Exchange Commission filings. By September, the firm had increased its equity haul to $350 million. Early investors in the vehicle include the National Pension Service of Korea, which committed $200 million towards the first close.
37
The Carlyle Group easily remains in the top 10 of the PERE 50 ranking, having collected more than $7.3 billion of discretionary equity for its real estate vehicles over the past five years. A large chunk of the Washington DCbased firms tally comes from the Carlyle Realty Partners series, most notably Carlyle Realty Partners VI. The firm, whose real estate effort is led by managing director Robert Stuckey, raised $2.34 billion for that vehicle in 2011, which was among the largest funds to have closed between 2011 and 2012. Other significant components of Carlyles tally are Carlyle Europe Real Estate Partners III, which raised $3.494 billion in 2008, and Carlyle Asia Real Estate Partners II, which raised $486 million in 2009. In addition, credit funds have been a feature of the firm since the beginning of the global financial crisis, and Carlyle has raised a number of such vehicles. Unfortunately for Carlyle, debt funds are not counted towards its PERE 50 total. One question mark for Carlyles future capital-raising tally concerns its current attitude towards Europe. Indeed, the firm has decided against raising a follow-up vehicle to its most-recent Europe-focused fund in order to concentrate on asset management initiatives for the existing portfolio.
Goldman Sachs used to be in the top three of the PERE 50 ranking when Wall Street was awash with cash. However, even the most ardent fan of the platform would have to concede that the investment bank has changed enormously since 2008. As a result, Goldman has slipped five places since last year, reflecting the fact that it hasnt been in the market with an opportunistic fund since Whitehall International 2008. That said, the firm has been very successful in raising real estate debt funds and currently is in the market with another vehicle that will seek to make investments in the US and Europe. For the purposes of the PERE 50, Whitehall International 2008 is the vehicle that has contributed most to Goldmans five-year tally, adding $2.34 billion of the firms total. The same year, it raised a US-focused real estate vehicle, helping the firm rack up $5.6 billion over the past five years. Many observers consistently have said that Goldmans Whitehall series is dead. That has prompted one of the most intriguing questions in the industry: Is Goldman going to continue to be a major force in global real estate investing the way it has for more than 20 years?
Brookfield Asset Management is a huge riser in the PERE 50 ranking, up 14 places since last year. The Toronto- and New York-based firm is now among the top 10 real estate capital-raisers. The single largest contribution towards Brookfields $5.2 billion equity focused total is derived from Brookfield Stra- Blattman: on higher returns tegic Real Estate Partners, which was launched in 2011 with a $3.5 billion target and had collected $2.63 billion by the end of last year. The fund is strategically important because it marks the firms first global opportunistic real estate offering. Indeed, in a recent interview with PERE, Barry Blattman, head of Brookfields real estate fund business, said the firm is very focused on building up its global opportunistic platform. Brookfield began laying the groundwork for the strategy less than a decade ago with the 2006 launch of its Brazil Retail Property Fund and two North America-focused opportunity funds in 2006 and 2007. In 2009, the firm launched its renowned Real Estate Turnaround Program, which represented its first global real estate capital-raising effort. However, that program, which raised a total of $5.5 billion, was structured as a club venture between a select group of limited partners.
10
How much does it cost to buy one of the biggest private equity real estate firms in terms of capital raised? The answer might soon be known as MGPA, led by executive chairman James Quille, is up for sale, with a deal imminent as of press time. One strong contender said to be in talks to buy the platform is BlackRock, the New York-based global asset manager that is conspicuously absence from the PERE 50. Indeed, PERE currently has the firm pegged as the 95th largest in terms of opportunistic real estate fundraising. Still, the big question is whether MGPA, under any new ownership, will be able to raise another fund of Quille: under the hammer significant size. For now, MGPA remains in the top 10 of the PERE 50 thanks to two funds that closed in 2008 - MGPA Asia Fund III and MGPA Europe Fund III, which raised $3.89 billion and $1.309 billion, respectively. Since then, the firm has not closed on a large opportunistic fund, although it has been in the market with MGPA Europe Fund IV and MGPA Asien Spezialfonds, the latter of which collects capital from German and Austrian investors for deployment in various Asian markets.
38
Morgan Stanley always has had one of the largest private equity real estate platforms in the world, in alignment with its global reach and network. Indeed, it came in second only to The Blackstone Group in last years PERE 30 ranking. The big factor in the fall of Morgan Stanley Real Estate Investing (MSREI) this year, however, is the fact that its $8 billion Morgan Stanley Real Estate Fund (MSREF) VI International is now out of consideration because it was raised in 2007, just outside the rankings five-year window. That leaves the firms fundraising tally hinging largely on MSREF VII Global, which closed on $4 billion in 2008. In that regard, Morgan Stanleys story is quite a similar to that of Goldman Sachs, the other Wall Street bank that has up until now paraded in the Top 3 of PERE s ranking. Still, the
11
12
CBRE Global Investors is huge in the private real estate world with more than $90 billion under management, but the Los Angeles-based juggernaut led by Matthew Khourie still is not really a powerhouse in terms of opportunistic and value-added funds. Nevertheless, the firm registers as a significant player, coming in at Number 12 in the PERE 50 ranking. Almost all of CBRE Global Investors recent capital-raising activity has focused on the US. For example, in 2012, the firm raised $1.1 billion for CBRE Strategic Partners US Value 6. The predecessor fund, US Value 5, closed on $1.295 billion in 2008 and, that same year, the firm raised $679 million for CBRE Strategic Partners US Opportunity 5. The primary exception to that US-centric focus is its European Shopping Center Fund, which has attracted 231 million in equity so far.
Westbrook Partners would have been slightly higher in this years PERE 50 ranking had it reached its target for its latest opportunity fund, Westbrook Real Estate Fund IX. As it was, the New York-based firm, founded by Morgan Stanley alum Paul Kazilionis, captured a respectable $1.588 billion in commitments, just shy of the $2 billion in equity it anticipated. Still, the capital that Westbrook did raise came from 78 institutional investors, including early commitments of $200 million apiece from the endowments of Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Fund IX combined with Westbrook Real Estate Fund VIII, which closed on $2.5 billion in 2008, gave Westbrook its tally.
13
14
There was no change in the standings for AREA Property Partners this year. Capital-raising activities over the past five years include $1.375 billion for AREA European Real Estate Fund III and $756 billion for AREA Value Enhancement Fund VII, both of which closed in 2008. Interestingly, the firm is back in the market with the next vintages of those two offerings, although first closings have yet to occur for either fund. Also adding to AREAs tally is the latest vehicle in its opportunistic series, AREA Real Estate Opportunity Fund VI, which closed on $518 million in 2011.
Angelo, Gordon & Co moves up two places in this years ranking. The New York-based investment firm frequently is out raising capital in any given year, and last year was no exception. Indeed, in 2012, the firm attracted $1.265 billion in commitments for its latest opportunity fund, AG Realty Fund VIII, as well as just over $1 billion for a core-plus vehicle, AG Core Plus Realty Fund III, although that fund is not counted for the purposes of the PERE 50, which focuses on value-added and opportunistic strategies. In addition, the firm currently is in market with the latest fund in its net lease series, AG Net Lease Realty Fund III, and is expecting to hold a first close imminently.
15
39
16
Besides raising significant equity for real estate debt strategies, 2012 was the year that Prudential Real Estate Investors wrapped up capital-raising for its latest fund focused on senior housing investments. The real estate investment management arm of US insurer Prudential Financial firm brought in $568 million for its Senior Housing Partners IV fund, beating its original $500 million capital-raising target. That fund will be used for direct and joint venture acquisitions of existing properties, forward commitments on developments and mezzanine loans. Prudential Real Estate Investors largest qualifying fundraising, however, came in Asia in 2009, when the firm raised $1.02 billion for its Asia Property Fund II.
19
17
San Francisco-based Shorenstein Properties moves up the PERE 50 ranking by two places, not because of any new capital-raising endeavours of its own but due to declines by others. The firms last fundraising remains Shorenstein Realty Investors Ten, which collected $1.23 billion in 2011. Still, the firm has been busy deploying that capital. According to Shorenstein, the fund has been used for investments in five properties, ranging from traditional properties like offices to alternative real estate like parking garages, in large cities like Chicago, Boston, San Francisco, Minneapolis and Houston. The firm is now landlord for some 23.6 million square feet of space Chicago: targeted in 2012 across the country.
18
40
One of Asias pre-eminent property companies for more than a decade, CapitaLands brand has been regarded as a sign of quality. So it is of little wonder that, when the Singapore-based firm seeds private equity real estate funds with its assets, the units of those fund are promptly snatched up just as shares of the REITs it forms and lists on local exchanges are snapped up by retail investors. The firms latest private offering to investors was 50 percent of a $1 billion vehicle called CapitaMalls China Development Fund III, which was seeded with three of its retail developments in greater China.
For TA Associates Realty, the last 12 months have been business as usual on the capital-raising front. Once gain, the Boston-based firm has managed an equity haul bigger than $1 billion, smashing its $1.25 billion capital-raising target for its latest fund, Fund X, and collecting $1.575 billion, a total that pushed its hard cap out by $75 million. Fund X will continue the same strategy as the firms predecessor vehicles, investing in industrial, office, residential and retail properties with a view to achieving value-added returns The vehicle will focus on major US markets with an emphasis on the East and West coasts.
20
Oaktree Capital Management owes much of its prominent debut one of the highest new entries in this years PERE 50 ranking to the fast pace of investing by its most recent real estate funds. During the second quarter of 2012, the Los Angeles-based investment manager launched its latest real estate offering, Oaktree Real Estate Opportunities Fund (ROF) VI, just a few months after the $1.3 billion final close of its predecessor, ROF V. Even more remarkable, the earlier vehicles fundraising period began just 18 months earlier. The pace of investment for ROF V was unusual for us, said Oaktrees chairman, Howard Marks, during an earnings call last year. Usually, the process is you raise the money and
21
22
Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Principal Investments is a vestige of an era that once saw the likes of Lehman Brothers and Citibank roam the earth as large opportunistic real estate beasts. The firms European funds are now being managed by Peakside Capital, while its pan-Asia fund, Merrill Lynch Asian Real Estate Opportunities Fund, which raised $2.65 billion in 2008, is being managed by The Blackstone Group. The defunct Bank of America Merrill Lynch platform will disappear from the PERE 50 without a trace next year, when it falls outside the rankings five-year fundraising window.
Walton Street Capital moves up seven spots in this years ranking, thanks to the completion of the first round of fundraising for its seventh commingled real estate fund, Walton Street Real Estate Fund VII, which attracted $710 million in commitments from limited partners such as the Teachers Retirement System of the State of Illinois and the Indiana Public Retirement System. The closing marks the first new equity raised by the Chicago-based firm since Walton Street Real Estate Fund VI, which raised $1.9 billion in 2009. The firm, which co-invested $50 million in the first closing, is expected to close on an additional $300 million in commitments imminently.
23 25
24
Northwood Investors continues to boost its total equity haul with the 2012 closing on $500 million in commitments for the third offering of its opportunistic real estate fund, Northwood Real Estate Partners, and related co-investment vehicles. The new closing follows the New York-based private equity real estate firms initial fundraising of $1.25 billion in August 2007 and a second capital-raise of more than $1 billion in September 2011. The fund has a unique evergreen structure, whereby Northwood can add capital to the fund once each calendar year, which is distinct from open-ended funds that can accept capital on a more frequent basis.
Another firm making its debut in this years ranking is Perella Weinberg Partners, which received a boost from raising some 900 million in equity commitments including a first close of more than 600 million in July for its pan-European opportunistic real estate fund, Perella Weinberg Real Estate Fund II. The new Bressler: doubling capital haul, which included Dutch pension down on Europe fund administrator APG Asset Management as a limited partner, nearly doubles the amount of equity that the New York-based asset management firm had collected over the past five years. The firm, led in Europe by Leon Bressler, previously raised 1.2 billion for its debut European vehicle, Perella Weinberg Real Estate Fund I, in 2008.
MAY 2013 | PERE 41
26
Lubert-Adler Partners owes its position in the PERE 50 ranking primarily to capital-raising endeavours on behalf of its 2008 fund, Lubert-Adler Real Estate Fund VI, which raised just over $2 billion in equity commitments. The Philadelphia-based firm followed up that offering, which was geared towards larger deals, second-home developments and resort properties, with two co-investment vehicles in 2010 and 2011. As PERE previously reported, Lubert-Adler is back in the market with its next offering, Lubert-Adler Fund VII, with a target size of $500 million and a hard cap of $850 million. The strategy is different this time around in that the focus is on middle-market retail, multifamily, hotel and industrial assets in the US through joint ventures with operating partners.
28
27
AEW Global has slipped a little in the ranking since last year, losing six places. The Bostonbased firm, which is a stalwart of the private equity real estate industry, last closed on a qualifying commingled fund in 2010, when investors committed $424 million to AEW Partners VI. Of course, it recently came to market with the latest offering in that series and has attracted $89 million in equity so far. AEWs largest fundraise over the past five years occurred in 2008 with European Property Investors Special Opportunities, which corralled $1.1 billion. Also counting towards its five-year tally is AEW Value Investors Asia ($557 million in 2008) and AEW Senior Housing Investors ($188 million in 2009).
29
Orion Capital Managers is the highest-ranked European firm in the PERE 50 indeed, it is the only Europe-based firm in the Top 30 if one overlooks MGPA, which is more of an Asia-based operation, and Perella Weinberg Partners, which is headquartered in New York. Orion makes the cut having raised 1.28 billion for Orion European Real Estate Fund III in 2009 and reportedly some 650 million for its follow-up vehicle, Fund IV. Although that fund has yet to close, the firm, which is fronted by Van Stults, Bruce Bossom and Aref LahBossom: ham, is understood to be targeting a simirepresenting lar capital haul to that of its predecessor. Europe
30
42
It has been 18 years since New Yorkbased DRA Advisors raised $189 million for its first private equity real estate fund. The 70-strong firm evidently has been doing the right things since then as today it is a $1 billion-plus fund manager. Its latest vehicle, DRA Growth and Income Fund VII, brought aboard $1 billion in equity commitments in 2011. For that money, investors can expect DRA to target existing properties with good cash flows and, predictably, an emphasis on coastal markets. Nevertheless, the strategy marks a continuation for the firm, proving predictability is one thing its investors do not mind.
31
32
33
The lions share of KSL Capital Partners qualifying equity for the PERE 50 ranking comes from KSL Capital Partners Fund III, which it closed on $2 billion in 2011. The Denverbased firm focuses on acquisitions of complex, operationally-intensive businesses and strives to unlock hidden value through re-envisioning and repositioning. Indeed, KSL Grove Park Inn Resort has been busy putting its strategy to & Spa: KSL sees value the test with recent investments in markets such as North Carolina, where it purchased the historic Grove Park Inn Resort & Spa for more than $100 million in April 2012. Its capital has a global appetite as well. Earlier this year, KSL was linked to bids for UK fitness chain David Lloyd Leisure, having already snapped up boutique hotel companies Malmaison and Hotel du Vin.
35
34
Rockpoint Group had the biggest final closing of the first quarter of 2013, raising $1.952 billion in equity for Rockpoint Real Estate Fund IV, and that haul alone determined the firms position in this years PERE 50. As with most fundraises these days, it has been a long slog getting over the finish line. Originally launched in 2011, the fund held its first close on $330 million in November that year. About $1.4 billion was raised by July before Rockpoint finally closed the vehicle in March this year. Distressed real estate is the label on the tin for this fund, while the small print notes that 20 percent of the equity can be deployed internationally.
The strapline on the homepage of Niams website reads partner of choice and, in terms of support from institutional investors, it would be tough to argue. Fifteen years after the firms formation, the Stockholm-based fund manager has twice closed the largest vehicle focused on the Nordics, in 2008 and last year. Dwarfing rival efforts in the region and surpassing its own 600 million target, its latest fund, Niam Nordic Fund V, collected 719 million, thanks to commitments from public and corporate pension plans, sovereign wealth funds, endowments and financial institutions both old and new to the firm. It has been a challenging fundraising environment, and we are very pleased with having been able to surpass our own target, Johan Bergman, chief executive Stockholm: Niams playground officer of Niam, said at the time of Fund Vs closing. Perhaps he should not have been too surprised given the firms track record. Indeed, the firm stated at that time that it had delivered leveraged IRRs of 31 percent since inception. Niams inclusion in the PERE 50 comes in part because the ranking has been extended from 30 firms and in part because the sector as a whole has raised less equity through the mega-funds and allocators that dominated prior to the global financial crisis. Still, those factors should not detract from the meaningful impact Niam has had in its markets, a point with which institutional investors evidently concur.
43
Senior management changes evidently havent diminished the fundraising power of the real estate fund manager formerly known as Prosperitas Investimentos. In fact, the new entity, Hemisferio Sul Investimentos, is the highest-ranking Latin Americafocused firm in the PERE 50 and one of several newcomers to the ranking. Maximo Lima, a founding partner of Prosperitas, formed Hemisferio Sul in November 2011, following the exit of the firms two other founding partners, Luciano Lewandowski and Jorge Nunez. Prosperitas previously had raised three Brazil-focused funds, including Prosperitas Real Estate Partners III, which closed on $750 million in 2011. The new firm, which is led by Lima and four new partners,
36
Hines saw one of the biggest declines this year, falling 16 spots in the PERE 50, now that several of its funds, including the 647.10 million Hines European Development Fund II and the $300 million Hines India Fund, are no longer within the rankings five-year window. The Houston-based firm has raised just one new qualifying vehicle since last years ranking, the $210 million Hines Value Added Venture III, but a substantial amount of its current tally comes from the nearly $1 billion in commitments that Hines previously gathered in 2012 and 2011, such those for the $515.8 million Hines Russia & Poland Fund.
37
After attracting $1.25 billion in commitments for its second opportunistic real estate fund, Cerberus Institutional Real Estate Partners II, in 2010, Cerberus Capital Management was back in the market with a successor fund last year. Fund III, which is targeting $1.2 billion in commitments, had raised $580 million as of press time. The new fundraising comes as no surprise when considering the pace at which the New York-based investment firm has been putting capital to work. Notably, in January, a Cerberus-led consortium agreed to buy five grocery chains comprising 877 retail stores from Minneapolis-based retail giant Supervalu: Cerberus Supervalu for $3.3 billion. sees value
39
In recent years, GI Partners has raised capital primarily through separate accounts, including a total of $754 million for TechCore and DataCore, through which the firm will invest in technology-focused properties in the US on behalf of the California Public Employees Retirement System and the California State Teachers Retirement System, respectively. The California-based firms most recent commingled effort, GI Partners Fund III, which collected $1.864 billion in 2009, is the sole reason for its inclusion in the PERE 50. However, if separate accounts continue to represent the bulk of the firms new capital-raising efforts, PERE may be bidding GI Partners adieu from the ranking in two years.
38
Raising the largest Brazil-focused real estate fund ever certainly goes a long way in bolstering a firms five-year equity tally. GTIS Partners, another firsttimer to the PERE 50 ranking, accomplished such a feat in February 2012, closing on $810.2 million in commitments for its second Brazilian real estate fund, GTIS Brazil Real Estate Fund II, and significantly exceeding its original target of $500 million. GTIS, however, isnt just focusing its capital-raising efforts on Brazil. The firm currently is in the market raising GTIS US Residential Strategies Fund and, as of March, it had amassed $185.85 million in equity towards a $400 million target, according to SEC filings.
40
44
41 42
Invesco Real Estate is catching the eye of the industry not only with its fundraising activity but also with its acquisitions. The Atlanta-based firms big corporate move arrived in Asia in 2011, when it bought a regional platform from embattled insurer American International Group. Subsequently, it has expanded its reach in the region to Australia. Fundraising activity has encompassed all three major regions, with vehicles closed for North America and Europe as well as Asia. Invesco currently is
Established in 1998, Crow Holdings manages the investments of the Trammell Crow family and its partners. In 2008, the Dallasbased firm raised $951 million for Crow Holdings Realty Partners V and is understood to have raised nearly $700 million in commitments for its sixth fund, which currently is in market. Like its predecessors, Realty Partners VI is targeting such US real estate assets as industrial, grocery-anchored and neighborhood retail properties, multifamily housing, offices, hotels and land. The vehicle, which will include income-oriented investments with modest forecasted appreciation as well as value-added investments, is expected to wrap up fundraising sometime this year.
CIM Group has slipped 16 places in the PERE 50, primarily due to its $2.37 billion CIM Real Estate Fund III now falling outside the rankings five-year window. Its last qualifying fundraising endeavour saw the Los Angeles-based firm close on $724 million for CIM Fund VI last year and return shortly afterwards with $360 million for Fund VIII, Hollywood & which currently is in the market. CIM also has raised Highland Center: a CIM smash significant co-investment capital over the past five years. CIM manages three different strategies opportunistic funds, core/stabilized funds and infrastructure vehicles and specializes in repositioning and development projects in established or emerging urban neighbourhoods across the US. According to the firm, one of its most successful investments has been the 632,000-square-foot Hollywood & Highland Center in its hometown in 2004.
43
Rockwood Capital has raised just north of $1.6 billion over the last five years for its value-added real estate strategy. In 2008, the White Plains, New York-based firm collected $964 million for Rockwood Capital Real Estate Partners Fund VIII and, more recently, followed up that effort with commitments of around $458 million so far for Fund IX. As PERE reported, Rockwood is seeking $750 million for its latest vehicle to invest in hotels, offices, residential and retail properties throughout the US that are underperforming or suitable for redevelopment or expansion. The firm launched the fund around February of last year.
44
Berkshire Property Advisors has raised a series of commingled funds and co-investment vehicles over the past five years, establishing a foothold among the PERE 50 in doing so. Recent fundraising activity by the Boston-based multifamily specialist includes $590 million for Berkshire Multifamily Value Fund II in 2008, $260 million for Berskshire Multifamily Equity Fund in 2011 and $300 million for Berkshire Multifamily Value Fund Co-investment III last year. That co-investment vehicle was formed on behalf of Australias Future Fund to invest alongside Berkshire Multifamily Value Fund III, to which the Australian investor committed an additional $50 million. The arrangement cements a powerful relationship with an A$80 billion (64.2 billion; $84 billion) state fund. Future Fund held A$5.2 billion, or 6.4 percent of its total assets, in real estate as of 30 September, and about 41 percent of that portfolio is invested in North America.
45
45
46 47
Harrison Street Real Estate Capital has made a name for itself by being one of the few experts in niche markets such as off-campus student housing, senior housing, medical office buildings and storage properties. Not only did the Christopher Merrill-led firm launch a new opportunistic vehicle in December, but the fund, Harrison Street Real Estate Partners IV, managed to attract $465 million in commitments by March. These days, Harrison Street finds itself in a very good place. Student housing, one of the firms specialties, is becoming an increasingly popular property type among in-
Due to its prior investment funds, most of which closed in 2008 and 2011, GE Capital Real Estate makes its debut on the PERE 50 list. Unfortunately, that honor may be short-lived as the Norwalk, Connecticut-based firm is in the process of winding down its real estate equity investment management business. Witness the sale of the management contract for its 240 million Polish Retail Fund to Valad Europe at the end of December and the departure of Jonathan Kern, its president of global investment management, earlier this year. While GE Capital Real Estate plans to manage out a number of its current equity holdings, the strategy going forward is to concentrate on the debt space.
48
Spear Street Capital, which has closed on $1.4 billion in equity since 2008, focuses on US office assets and portfolios valued at more than $25 million. Target assets are well-located properties that can generate high returns through proactive leasing efforts, physical improvement or repositioning, entitlement changes or the realization of adaptive re-use strategies. Properties in the San Franciscobased firms portfolio include Research Park Plaza I & II in Austin and Montague Park in San Jose.
49 50
Last summer, Stockbridge Capital Group closed on $220 million for its first value-added real estate fund, Stockbridge Value Fund. That fund will pursue office, industrial, retail and multifamily investments in major US markets, with a focus on distressed properties and portfolios that are undervalued or underutilized. Previously, the San Francisco-based firm sponsored three opportunistic funds and related co-investment vehicles that raised a total of $2.6 billion. Its last opportunistic fund, Stockbridge Real Estate Fund III, closed in 2008 and raised $1.15 billion.
46
A buyers market
The firms in this years PERE 50 purchased some $88.2 billion of property since the start of 2012, according to Real Capital Analytics. The Blackstone Group was far and away the most active buyer, outdistancing the next closest firm Starwood Capital Group by more than $9 billion.
$5.7
$5.1
$5.0
$4.8
$5.6
$5.3
$3.9
$5.3
Blackstone
Lone Star Starwood Invesco Real LaSalle Estate Investment Capital Management Group
Blackstone
Goldman Sachs
Morgan Stanley
Net results
With just a few exceptions, the firms of the PERE 50 engaged in both the buying and selling of real estate assets over the five quarters since the start of 2012. Among net buyers, look no further than The Blackstone Group, with more than $7.4 billion in net purchases. For net sellers, GE Capital led all firms with $3.7 billion in net sales.
$2.0
$2.0
$1.9
$1.6
Blackstone
Lone Star Starwood Invesco Real LaSalle Estate Investment Capital Management Group
Goldman Sachs
AEW Capital LaSalle Prudential Real Estate Investment Management Investors Management
Data provider Real Capital Analytics has tracked the volume and value of property transactions for the PERE 50 firms from January 2012 to the end of March 2013. The data is believed to be accurate but is not guaranteed. It includes direct property transactions only and covers activity by the parent companies as well as by a firms dedicated real estate funds. Full deal credit is allocated to both joint venture partners. Real Capital Analytics, Inc. 2013. http://rcanalytics.com
47