The modern study of animal behavior is generally thought to have begun in the 1960s, with Williams and Hamilton seen as founding figures. Williams addressed what constitutes an adaptation, arguing apparent altruism can be explained by kin selection. Hamilton's rule showed how altruism could evolve through inclusive fitness when the benefit to recipients (B) multiplied by their relatedness (r) outweighs the cost to the altruist (C). Empirical studies on Mexican jays, Belding's ground squirrels, and vampire bats provided support for kin selection and reciprocity explaining apparently altruistic behaviors.
The modern study of animal behavior is generally thought to have begun in the 1960s, with Williams and Hamilton seen as founding figures. Williams addressed what constitutes an adaptation, arguing apparent altruism can be explained by kin selection. Hamilton's rule showed how altruism could evolve through inclusive fitness when the benefit to recipients (B) multiplied by their relatedness (r) outweighs the cost to the altruist (C). Empirical studies on Mexican jays, Belding's ground squirrels, and vampire bats provided support for kin selection and reciprocity explaining apparently altruistic behaviors.
The modern study of animal behavior is generally thought to have begun in the 1960s, with Williams and Hamilton seen as founding figures. Williams addressed what constitutes an adaptation, arguing apparent altruism can be explained by kin selection. Hamilton's rule showed how altruism could evolve through inclusive fitness when the benefit to recipients (B) multiplied by their relatedness (r) outweighs the cost to the altruist (C). Empirical studies on Mexican jays, Belding's ground squirrels, and vampire bats provided support for kin selection and reciprocity explaining apparently altruistic behaviors.
The modern study of animal behavior is generally thought to have begun in the 1960s, with Williams and Hamilton seen as founding figures. Williams addressed what constitutes an adaptation, arguing apparent altruism can be explained by kin selection. Hamilton's rule showed how altruism could evolve through inclusive fitness when the benefit to recipients (B) multiplied by their relatedness (r) outweighs the cost to the altruist (C). Empirical studies on Mexican jays, Belding's ground squirrels, and vampire bats provided support for kin selection and reciprocity explaining apparently altruistic behaviors.
Animal Behavior History II: from ~1960 Sociobiology (1975) Opposed at Harvard by his evolutionary biologist colleagues Steven J. Gould, Richard Lewontin Attacked at talk Nov 1978 AAAS meeting: Wilson, youre all wet! Some Case Studies: E.O. Wilson Wilson: "I believe...I am the only scientist in modern times to have been physically attacked for an idea!" Science and religion are two of the most potent forces on Earth and they should come together to save the creation. A scientific humanist = the only worldview compatible with science's growing knowledge of the real world and the laws of nature. 1960s: The rise of sociobiology 1964 W. D. Hamilton papers on inclusive fitness 1966 George Williams Adaptation and Natural Selection 1970-1976 Robert Trivers many seminal papers 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35-57. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the descent of man. 1975. Parent-offspring conflict. American Zoologist 14: 249-264. 1976. (with Hare, H.) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191: 249-263. 1960 -70s Richard Alexander & students 1974. The evolution of social behavior. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics 5: 325-383. 1975 E. O. Wilson Sociobiology 1976 Richard Dawkins The Selfish Gene 1970s John Maynard Smith many seminal papers 1973. (with George Price) The logic of animal conflict, Nature 246:15-18 behavioral ecology Dick Alexander Had a huge influence on the field (30+ grad students, many postdocs, influenced many others as well ). Brought Hamilton to Michigan, also Trivers. 2 Kenneth Shaw Mary Jane West Dan Otte Mitchell Weiss Ann Pace Harry Power Paul Sherman John Hoogland Rick Howard Marianne Feaver Gerry Borgia Katie Noonan David Foltz Cynthia Kagarise Nancy Moran Marlene Zuk David Queller Joan Strassman (UG) Alex Mintzer Bernard Crespi Richard Connor Beverly Strassman Stan Braude Eileen Lacey Andy Richards John Pepper John Cooley David Marshall Deborah Ciszek Anna Bess Sorin Bret Weinstein Laura Howard PhD students of Dick Alexander
Note: he influenced many
others as well, including those who had him a committee member (e.g., Trish Schwagmeyer) or postdoc advisor (e.g., Jim Lloyd, Laura Beitzig), or who eavesdropped on his lectures (me, many others) Mary Jane West The modern study of animal behavior is generally thought to have begun in 1960s, and Williams and Hamilton are often nominated as the founding figures. W. D. Hamilton George Williams Robert Trivers 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. QuarterlyReviewof Biology 46: 35-57. 1972. Parental investment andsexual selection. In Campbell, B. (ed.), Sexual Selection and the descent of man. 1975. Parent-offspringconflict. American Zoologist 14: 249-264. 1976. (with Hare, H.). Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science 191: 249-263. 1982. (with Newton, H.P). The crash of flight 90: doomed by self-deception? Science Digest 111: 66-67. 2011. The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self- Deception in Human Life. Basic Books. 3 Bob Trivers & Huey Newton The benefit of self-deception is the more fluid deception of others. The cost is an impaired ability to deal with reality. Trivers & Newton 1982 Huey Newton: political radical, co-founder of the Black Panthers Two key insights (Williams, Hamilton, others): 1. selection at the level of the individual (or gene, Dawkins) 2. Apparent altruism can be explained by kin selection Early debate hinged on two questions 1. What is an adaptation? Williams addresses this question 2. Altruistic traits good for the group but bad for the individual (group selection, Wynne-Edwards) Alarm calls why do individuals put themselves at risk to protect others (not their offspring) Reproductive restraint why do individuals produce fewer offspring than they are capable of? The modern study of animal behavior is generally thought to have begun in 1960s, and Williams and Hamilton are often nominated as the founding figures. Williams major question: what is / is not an adaptation? Adaptation is often recognized in purely fortuitous effects, and natural selection is invoked to resolve problems that do not exist. (p 4) Adaptation is a special and onerous concept that should be used only where it is really necessary. When it must recognized, it should be attributed to no higher a level of organization than is demanded by the evidence. (pp 4-5) [i.e., nix on group selection] The designation of something as the means or mechanism for a certain goal or function or purpose will imply that the machinery involved was fashioned by selection for the goal attributed to it. [e.g., vision is the function of the eye, reproduction and dispersal the function of the apple] When I do not believe that such a relationship exists, I will avoid such terms and use words appropriate to fortuitous relationships such as cause and effect. (p 9) ALTRUISM: behavior that benefits another individual at a cost to the altruist's personal fitness (ability to produce offspring). - C + B Altruist Recipient 4 Group Selection and Reproductive Restraint V. C. Wynne-Edwards, Animal Dispersion in relation to Social Behaviour (1962) Lemmings are small mouselike rodents that live in the Arctic tundra. They are known for extreme fluctuations in population size. At high population densities, large number leave their homes to travel long distances. In the course of their journey, many die, some by drowning, as they attempt to swim across lakes and rivers. One popular explanation for their behavior is that the travelers are actually committing suicide to relieve overpopulation. The suicidal lemmings thus leave shelter and food for those that have stayed behind, and so save the species (or population) from extinction. Whats the problem with this hypothesis? The logical problem with group selection Perrins 1965 (Swifts) Reproductive Restraint Perrins 1965; Lack 1966 Reproductive Restraint 5 Reproductive Restraint Bill Hamilton's 1963 and 1964 inclusive fitness articles are easily the most cited articles in the entire field of behavioral evolution, and his work on altruism and kinship spurred endless dissertation projects and hundreds of published articles, both theoretical and empirical. When modern behavioral ecologists and sociobiologists are asked to mark the birth of the field, many respond by citing Hamilton's 1963 and 1964 articles. Dugatkin, L. A. (2007) Inclusive Fitness Theory from Darwin to Hamilton. Genetics 176: 1375-1380. Back to Hamilton 6 Question: Would you lay down your life for your brother? No, but I would for two brothers or eight cousins J.B.S. Haldane Hamiltons take on altruismanticipated by Haldane ALTRUISM & KIN SELECTION Three factors are important in the spread and maintenance of an altruism gene by kin selection: 1. benefit to recipient, B 2. cost to altruist, C 3. degree of relatedness between altruist & recipient, r Hamiltons Rule states the conditions under which altruism will spread. In its simplest form it is: r B > C r Recipient r B>C/r identical twin 1 B > C 1 parent 1/2 B > 2C full sib 1/2 B > 2C half sib 1/4 B > 4C niece/nephew* 1/4 B > 4C uncle/aunt ** 1/4 B > 4C 1 st cousin 1/8 B > 8C * assumes your sib is full sib ** assumes your parents sib was full When should you be altruistic? When B > C/r 7 From Gardner et al 2008 West talk on group selection: http://www.vimeo.com/8202768 Pagel talk on group selection: http://www.vimeo.com/8504335 Empirical Studies Jerram Brown Mexican jays [helpers at the nest & kin selection] 1970. Cooperative breeding and altruistic behaviour in the Mexican jay. Animal Behavior 18: 366-378. 1974. Alternate routes to sociality in jays - with a theory for the evolution of altruism and communal breeding. American Zoologist 14: 63-80. Paul Sherman Beldings ground squirrels [kin selection] 1977. Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science 197: 1246- 1253. 1985. Alarm calls of Belding's ground squirrels to aerial predators: nepotism or self-preservation? Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology 17: 313-323. Jerry Wilkinson Vampire bats [reciprocity] 1984. Reciprocal food sharing in the vampire bat. Nature 308: 181-184 1990. Food sharing in vampire bats. Scientific American 262, 2: 64-70. Paul Sherman Beldings ground squirrels 1977. Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science 197: 1246-1253. Alarm calling is potentially risky (exposes caller to danger) but valuable to unaware ground squirrel that hears it = Altruism
